Los Angeles Webster Commission records, 1931-1992

Data summaries, 1992

(USC DC Other)

Data summaries, 1992

PDF

Download a page range

Download transcript

Copy asset link

Request this asset

Transcript (if available)

Content • • • REQUEST SUfittARY -- ADDITIONAL SWORN POSITIONS/UPGRADES 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 DESCRIPTION DIVISION REQUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED REOUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED Abused Child Unit JUV 7 0 0 0 3* 16* 0 0 0 ACIS OSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15* 0 Administrative Appeals COP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 Area Detectives 00 55 0 35* 41* 50* 50* 50* 0 52* Asset Forfeiture Detail NAR 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Baldwin Hills Sub-station sow 0 0 0 0 10* 10* 0 0 0 Basic Cars 00 0 0 0 0 102* 0 60* 0 0 Bond Fund Group OAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Chinatown Substation 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* Commission Investigations PCO 0 0 0 0 8* 0 8* 0 8* Civil Liabilities OAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 1* 0 Computer Fraud Unit BFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* 0 0 DARE BSI 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 DARE BSI 41 0 68* 0 37* 78* 28* 0 23* Discovery Unit OAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* l* 0 Discrimination Complaints EOO 0 0 0 0 1* 0 2* 0 0 DRE TCS 0 0 0 0 l* 0 0 0 0 nrug Test Program PER 0 0 0 0 5* 4 0 0 0 F.lectronics Section Supervision SID 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 Employee Relations Investigations ERA 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Employee Reoresentation Unit PTB 0 0 0 0 2* 2 0 0 0 Felony Warrant Services OSD 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Firearms & Explosives SID 10 0 (2} (2} 0 0 0 4* 0 Footheats 00 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Foreign Prosecution DSD 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 0 GRAT$ NAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3* Hazardous Materials TPS 5 0 0 0 0 0 2* 0 3* Headquarters Supervision DHD 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 0 Helicopter Crews ASD 0 0 0 0 4* 4* 9* 0 0 Homicide Supervision OSB 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 Human Relations Unit TRN 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !BARS TCS 0 0 0 0 1* l* 0 0 0 Internal Investigations IAD 7 0 10* 0 9* 0 39* 22* 17* K9 Unit MET 4 0 0 0 4* 3* 7* 7* 0 • • • Paqe 2 REQUEST SUfflARY -- ADDITIONAL SWORN POSITIONS/UPGRADES 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 DESCRIPTION DIVISION REQUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED REQUESTED APPROVED REOUESTED APPROVED Litigation Processin~ OAS 0 0 0 0 l* 1 4* 0 6* Mental Evaluation Unit OHO 11 0 0 0 l* 0 5* 0 0 Mounted Unit MET 0 0 32* 31* 0 0 0 0 0 Narcotics Enforcement NAR 94 0 0 0 0 125* 0 0 0 Patrol Officers 00 0 250 250 550 400 500 400 400 0 Patrol Supervisors 00 0 0 35* 42* 29* 0 24* 0 0 Police Facilities PRO 1 0 1* 1* 0 0 0 0 1* Property Division Reorg. PRO 0 0 0 0 ( 1) (1) 0 0 0 Psychological Profiler DSD 1 0 1* 1* 0 0 0 0 0 Rampart Vice RAM 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 0 0 Research/Development SID 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 Traffic Enforcement 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 34* 0 0 Use of Force PTB 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Wiretap Unit SID 0 0 0 0 5* 0 3* 0 0 Youngblood Decision 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23* Younqblood necision SID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* Youn9blood necision BSI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2* TOTAL ADOITIONAL 314 250 248 550 400 514 400 403 0 TQgL UPGRADES 0 0 182 116 276 287 283 50 142 *Indicates request for position upgrade • • • OFFICE OF nlE SPECIAL ADVISOR TO nm BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS CITY OF LOS ANGELES A, GENERAL DEPARTMENT INFORMATION Continued 29. How many sworn officers (all ranks) currently serve in your depanment? 7,875 (July 12, 1992) 30. How many positions for sworn officers ( all ranks) are currently budgeted? 7,974 (July 12, 1992) . 31. How many sworn officers (all ranks) served in the following years? 1980· 1970 1%0 I 6,635 6,806 4,661 I 32 What is the current sworn composition of the police depanment? 52. 56 % White Male 7.46 % White Female 11. 52 % African/ 2. 54 % African/ American Male American Female 19.15 % Hispanic Male 3.12 % Hispanic Female 2.46 % Asian Male .40 % Asian Female .19 91, Natiw: American .10 % Native American Male Female . 46 ,,r, Other Male .04 % Other Female 1/2Hl 13 .._____--"---'--=-----:.-----...~..:..;...;,.,.------.:. · ....;, ·--...w•~• !!;.. · .;..;, ' ·-,.___· --~ - 9:.·--~--' . . _ ... . . _, .... ·. ~ ........ '!.. ..... ~- ·- .... .. . _ ..... - - ~ •• , . . •:. : • .__. ...... • • • July 27, 1992 2.1 INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division FROM: Commanding Officer, Personnel Division SUBJECT: DEPLOYMENT FIGURES FOR 1979 THROUGH 1992 In accordance with your request, the attached table reflects duthorized and deployment figures for the last 14 years. Although information was requested for the last 15 years, Personnel Division can only provide the attached. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Jerry Klein of Position Control at 485-3272 . DANIEL B. WATSON, Captain Commanding Officer Personnel Division Attachment • I • I • SWORN AUTHORIZED AND DEPLOYMENT FIGURES IN THE MONTH OF JANUARY FOR 1979 THROUGH 1992 YEAR AUTHORIZED POSITIONS *PERSONNEL DEPLOYED 1979 7,035 6,960 1980 7,082 6,723 1981 7,125 6,691 1982 7,146 6,867 1983 6,900 6,904 1984 6,910 I 7,039 1985 6,900 7,051 1986 7,000 7,049 1987 7,100 6,967 1988 7,350 7,247 1989 7,900 7,678 1990 8,414 7,883 1991 8,817 8,445 1992 8,417 8,146 *Includes deployment allowed through the granting of Council Resolution and substitute authorities • I I • • • OFFICE OF 1llE SPECIAL ADVISOR TO nm BOARD OF POLICE CO~ONERS CITY OF LOS ANOEI PS A GENERAL DEPARTMENT INFORMATION Continued 16. If applicable. list the total number of full time sworn personnel assigned to community oriented policing assignments. 4-,279 (Police Ofer I through Lieutenant I; assigned to patrol divisions) 17. If applicable. list the total number of pan time sworn personnel assigned to community oriented policing assignments. None 18. If applicable. list the total number of full time civilian personnel assigned to problem oriented policing assignments. None 19. If applicable. list the total number of part time civilian personnel assigned to problem oriented policing assignments. 20. 21. None How many dcpanmcnt personnel are assigned to field operations? (Police Ofer I through Captain III; 7,014 assigned to Office of Operations, including Narcotics Group) Is it your depanment's policy to respond to all calls for service? I I No I 1/2R2. 10 • _ _ • .__..• • •• • • ,6 '- • • • INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE ~uly 27. 1992 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division Commanding Officer, Personnel Division NUMBER OF OFFICERS ON RESTRICTED DUTY PER DAY In response to your request, Medical Liaison Section researched the number of officers on restricted duty per day. During the past two years, approximately 300 officers per year were available for assignment in light duty positions. Of these 300 officers, there was an average of 206 officers assigned light duty positions per day. The remaining 94 officers were on days off, holidays, vacations, sick, or IOD (Injured on Duty> status. Should additional information be needed, you or your staff ma y contact Lieutenant Ed Gagnon, Medical Liaison Section at 485- 4087. Commanding Officer Personnel Division • • • August 5, 1992 10.1 INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division FROM: Commanding Officer, Fiscal Operations Division SUBJECT: WEBSTER PANEL REQUEST - NUMBER OF OFFICERS LOST PER DAY ON OVERTIME The Police Department is generally, funded for only 30% of the sworn overtime worked. That results in losing officers for more hours on compensatory time off than was gained by working the officers on overtime. As an example, an officer works three (3) hours of overtime and is compensated in cash for 1 hour (1/3 cash), leaving two (2) hours of compensatory time at time and one-half or a total of three (3) hours to be taken off (the same number of productive hours gained). Consequently, if cash compensation is less than one-third of total hours worked the Department ends up with less productive hours than they would have had if no overtime had been worked. The table below represents the number of overtime hours actually taken off during the past four fiscal years. It also includes a calculation of the average number of officers lost every day (seven day a week), as well as the equivalent officers lost (work days lost). The latter represents the number of additional officers it would take to replace officers taking off overtime. It takes into account if you hired additional officers to cover the officers that are taking overtime off, the number of paid days off (vacation, holidays, sick, etc.) for the new officers would also have to be factored into the calculation. Officers loat, -per day, due to overtime off: Calendar days - No. of OT* - 2920 Hours Fiscal Year Hours Off (365 Eight-Hour Days) 1991-92 1,279,514 438 Officers/Day 1990-91 1,215,760 416 " " 1989-90 936,972 321 " " 1988-89 992,845 340 " " • Commanding Officer~ Legal Affairs Division Page 2 10.1 Work days - Fiscal Year 1991-92 1990-91 1989-90 1988-89 No. of OT* Hours Off 1,279,514 1,215,760 936,972 992,845 - 1750 HOurs** 731 Officers/Day 695 II II 535 II II 567 II II * Source document: overtime History Report **Officers are paid for 2,088 hours (261 days); however, after deducting holidays, vacation, sick, IOD, etc. there is an average of 1,750 working hours. If you have any questions, you may call me at (213) 485-3836 • • ~~/1£Lj WENDELL L. NICHOLS, Chief Management Analyst Commanding Officer Fiscal Operations Division • • • CLASS ZZA ZZB ::c 22D 22E 22F 2ZG 22H ::zr 22.J ZZL :a. ; z::o ZZQ ZZF 22S ZZT ::u LOS ANGELES POLICE FLEET INVENTORY OF 7/27/92 DESCRIPTION 8/l~ :::·L 2 DR STATI!JN WGN M/C SOLO M/C 3./WH BUS SUBURB~N 8/WGN .JEEP TYF·E 'v'AN TF:UCK VAN P ICP UF· TRUCK UTILITY STAl<E TOW TRACTOF: TRAILER SEMI-TRAILER FORK LIFT SPECIAL T:JT,4L: CURF:ENT COUNT 1C60 1399 5 470 18 18 16 7 41 102 26 3 / .L 22 6 8 38 3 :3857 TOTAL COST 12!' 701 ~ U:;S 5,765 !' 140 23!'.S51 ;~, 377 !' 396 110~235 267,405 248, 4·~9 277!'420 218~ '710 13,850 583~'719 194, 113 57, 146 93,448 157~048 141!'346 9,286 27!'024 ~----------------- .SL.S ~ D\A.AL Pt.\tttooJ~ v~lU ... ~~'.A-~ 'N11l+ Sl~oT~"" t'fActc:.r \..,\ Gtrrs S \f'l..cN .. !" ,. • • • I : I I ' t ' ; • . ' e I I ;t .' I i . "' T~;t.."i' t .' t:;.: ... July 22, 1992 10.t. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Commanding Officer, Fiscal Support Bureau Commanding Officer, Motor Transport Division DUAL PURPOSE SEDANS Le RE C Ei VED JUL 2 2 1992 FI SC:-L :J:.,.-, 1.,i, I 8 Ufi ::.. J.\ iJ There are ~20 Dual Purpose Sedans assigned to various divisions in the Department. Of these ~20 vehicles, 115 are assigned to Metropolitan Division, 1 is assigned to the Metro K-9 Unit, and 11 are assigned to the Metro Mounted Unit. A list of other divisions including the number of cars assigned is attached for information. For further information, please call Mary Keating at extension 53~95. c:;~~/-2✓..w PAUL R. BEc){k~ Director of Police Transportation II Commanding Officer Motor Transport Division • • • DJIL PlldlOSIL .ISSIC USS ASSIGNMENT 77th Street BS! Central Devonshire Detective Support Division Foothill Harbor Hollenbeck Hollywood Metropolitan Division Metro K-9 Metro Mounted Unit Northeast North Hollywood Narcotics Newton Operations Central Bureau Office of Chief of Police Operations Headquarters Bureau Office of Operations Operations South Bureau Operations Valley Bureau Operations West Bureau Pacific Police Commission Rampart Robbery Homicide Division Southeast Southwest Scientific Investigation Division Tactical Planning Section Traffic Coordination Section Van Nuys Valley Traffic Division West Valley Wilshire West Los Angeles NUMBER OF VEHICLES 18 1 8 10 3 15 11 10 10 115 1 11 11 9 7 15 [Jr (t 1 2 15 1 15 11 2 13 1 11 16 16 2 1 11 (t 12 16 _7 ~20 ,--- - - - ·-- - - - - - • • • July 29,1992 1.9 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division Commanding Officer, Support Services Bureau HOME-GARAGING AUTHORITIES On July 28, 1992, Officer George Lamy, Office of Administrative Services, Legal Affairs Division, requested, on behalf of the Special Advisor to the Board of Police Commissioners, the exact number of plain cars garaged at home. Department employees currently home garage 827 vehicles (481 cars and 346 motorcycles). On June 23, 1992, the Board of Police Commissioners considered a request from the Chief of Police to increase the number of Home-Garaged vehicles to 830 (484 cars and 346 motorcycles) for fiscal year 1992-93 • ~-f~-- CARLO CUDIO, - ~ommander Acting Commanding Officer Support Services Bureau • • • / . / MOTOR TRANSPORT DIVISION 1. VEHICLES a. Black and Whites - 925 FY 1991-92 Requested Replacements Approved 150 (Over 100,000 miles} o [Additional 30 cars over 90,000 miles] FY 1992-93 Requested Replacements Approved 295 (Over 100,000 miles) o [Additional 74 cars over 90,000 miles] FY 1993-94 Requested Replacements 487 (Over 100,000 miles) [Additional 26 cars over 90,000 miles] b. Plain 4 Doors - 1,150 Plain 2 Doors - 486 FY 1991-92 Requested Replacements Approved 253 (Over 100,000 miles) 253 [Additional 56 cars over 90,000 miles] FY 1992-93 Requested Replacements Approved 147 (Over 100,000 miles) o (Additional 123 cars over 90,000 miles] FY 1993-94 Requested Replacements 276 (Over 100,000 miles} [Additional 31 cars over 90,000 miles] c. Motorcycles - 434 FY 1992-93 Requested Replacements 122 (Over 60,000 miles} FY 1993-94 Requested Replacements 164 (Over 60,000 miles} d. Miscellaneous Trucks, Buses, etc. - 247 Total Acquisition Value: $37,866,336 Approved 16 e. Asset Forfeiture (Narcotics Seized Vehicles) - 110 f. Hold Harmless Vehicles - 120 • • • July 30, 1992 9.2 INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Commanding Officer, Legal Affairs Division FROM: Commanding Officer, Communications Division SUBJECT: ROVERS STATISTICS In response to the July 15, 1992, request from staff of Special Advisor Webster, attached is statistical information regarding Remote Out-of-Vehicle Emergency Radios (ROVERs). If there are any questions related to this matter, please have a member of your staff contact Officer R. D. Camp, Communications Equipment Coordinator, Communications Division, at extension 5-3230. l < I ~/i I /\11 _ _ / / l . ~ , _..~\ ~ / /4REGORy--'R. B G, Captain / Commanding g:. f icer t _ Communica~kons Division \... • • • ASSIGNMENT OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT ROVERS July 27, 1992 The following statistics regarding the number of Remote Out-of Vehicle Emergency Radios (ROVERs) in service at the Los Angeles Police Department are provided in response to the July 15, 1992, request from the staff of Special Advisor Webster: There were originally 4,257 ROVERs in the Police Department inventory. Of these, 255 are reported lost, destroyed or stolen, and approximately 150 are at the Radio Shop for repairs at any given time. Therefore, there are approximately 3,852 ROVERS which are in service or available for assignment throughout the Department. The average monthly cost of repairing and maintaining ROVERs is $36,440. One hundred twenty additional handheld radios which were purchased in April for the civil unrest are also in service. There are no maintenance or repair figures available for these radios • These statistics were provided by Los Angeles Police Department, Communications Division . FORM GEN. 160 (Rev. 6-80) CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE • • • DATE: August 6, 1992 TO: Officer George Lamy, Legal Affairs Division ~~~,~artment FROM: Donald R. Keith, Director of Communications Services Department of General Services SUBJECT: ROVER RADIO INVENTORY AND COST STATISTICS The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Legal Affairs Division has requested statistical information relative to LAPD'S radio system. This is in response to an inquiry by the LAPD' s Board of Police Commissioners, Office of the Special Advisor (Webster Commission). The Department of General Services (GSD) Communications Services Division records indicate the following inventory and associated costs for support of LAPD'S ROVERS . REMOTE OUT OF VEHICLE EMERGENCY RADIO (ROVER> LAPD Inventory (Motorola MX300 and 350): 4,005 Out of Service Repairs (Daily Averages): 150 ---------------------ti Repairs - GSD Technicians (Daily Averages): 30 Maintenance Cost per Radio ( 1 . 53 labor hours, $32.06 + repair parts, $21.00) (Average Cost): Annual Cost: $53.06 $407,496.00 If you have any questions in this matter, please contact Donald R. Keith, Director of Communications Services, at extension 5-2755. DRK:dbp • • • OFFICE OF TI-IE SPECIAL ADVISOR TO TIIE BOARD OF POLICE CO~IONERS CITY OF LOS ANGELES D. DEPARTMENT RfSOURCES Continued 69. Are cellular/portable telephones supplied to department members? 70. I No If •yes•, what rank lcveVs in your department are supplied with cellular/portable telephones? l\tbst staff officers (officers above the rank of Captain) and some specialized units are supplied with cellular telephones . Does your Department have a mobile command post vehicle? I ® No I If so. select (circle) from the following list the equipment that it contains: (9 Telephones (D FAX machines · 0 Radios capable of communicating with other governmental agencies @ Television monitors 0 Reserve flex-cuffs f. Spare radios g. Spare radio batteries 1/ 1J92 26 .__..,.._- .. . . - ... . WAL K EP RE S IDENCE TEL:1- 8 18-440- 02 14 J u 1 l s I 9 2 1 l : 4 4 N O . 1 :1 0 2 F · . :: 7 • • • TO; lJM,VER3U (;OJ 'Jt 11' LIPMAN C03 Steve Preus co3 Joy FROH: SCJ£NEIR C03 Rita DATE: June 3, 1992 SURJF.CT: Poliee Communications RF.FF.RENCE: Joy's memo of 6/2 Following up on Joy's memo 1:egarding nary.1 GlitA~' complaints about laek 0£ communications equipment a.nd th" r.ounr.i1/M~y,,r'e fllilt1rc to p.rovJ.do resources, I talked to thA CAO tn g~t th~ir v~rsion ., . . Ac~c:c,rcHng to PAtfltr n1r.11rlo, Budget Analyst for LAPD and Jim Sob Ject t J • who s responsible for the eapitd pro1rc:un !or the police co111municaLfom1 system, LAPD propoc;od 4 _ m4jor new communica1.1onl:I !lystem wh:fch wll,. approved by the Mayor and Council 1n Fftb 1?90. H~11ot m~A~11rA~ whi~h would h~ve fundAd thA system were r~jected by tho voters in 11/90 and 4/9l.. OnA nf thfll mnU vat.i ona bt11htnd thA Ar fort tn p hn .-.r,rl funci thR nAw eommun1cAt1nnA ~y~tAm WllA thfll 11v~i,~hi11ty nf 19 new radio ehAnn~ls whieh the FCC m<!rlA .-av,.1 hhl& tn I,APD boC'.~ttso i,ur eyst.~.m is ov~rloadod. The esteh is th11t if WA rinn't u"e the eh~nnel,; by the ~nd of l995, Wf' lose them, About 2-3 years a~o, Council ~ave LAPD authorJ.ty to hire a consult4nt to ht1lp davalup thw RrP for a new communicatiom, ~yst11ui. · Th.is e!!oz:t is way behind schedule and still dugiing cm hut. tht1 RFP f x •utpRctAcl to be ready to be issued this summer. Althouah we won't know ~xactly what.' s fovolvt1d until thll rasp0n&tu1 to the RFP come back, Sob.1oct' o ostimate was th11t it will ht1" $~0 to $100 m:f.llion program. Meanwhile, 11r.~nrd~ng to DiC4rlo, th• city ho.a been 3ivill1 LAPD tho rosoureee to hA1p m11kt1 do with tht1 y11tam that. we have. We havo started a repl8r.fltm111nt. progrllffl for Lhtt ROVERs under which about 1500 will be replaced each year (out of th~ r.urr111nt hudg•L) up to 7000 replacement~. The new ROVERs 4re supposed to b~ c.omp11tihlA with 11 futurA ayatem and with the 39 new FCC ch4nnc1G. I ~e;kod whAn thh rephe"'"""t program b•gan and Pet.e :..du tha.t .Lt was l.n tho 90-91 budg~t but was delayed to 91-92 because th111 D111rt WBMt,'L rt11Bdy to prococd. Additional funds aro in 92-93 budact. Also, thAT"M b '1n RFP out to repl4ce the Mobile Di&i tal Termi.n11 l" (MDTs); tholl!IA prnpoMfllA 11rA Rupposad to provide repl4cflmcnt ~quipme-nt which will be ec,111p11tib1A with 11 ,utur11 ~y~t.;em. Ther~ aro !unds in the budget: to cove~ the first b4tch of tfllphcAmAnt,ii, "bout 400 units. I asked ~ohjt1ct what might be done to !und the cocaplct.o neiw !'Y"tA11 which the RFr wi l J dt1fint1. Htt ~ay~ l.ha.L t;he CAO will piobably recommend o bond issue, As an altern~tivA, thAy r.Bn look at how mAnY yaara lh• t;U&t can bo Qpl:o4d out and wh~~ wnulrl hA rRquir.ed in each yMBr'~ budget to covor tho cost on a pay--4s-you-go b11sb. Hft S4id that ther~ has be~n B ~11gg~~tion that B special tax on tclcphono servtcR miaht bo usod to r11:l1111 fund" for" n11w emergency communJ.cAtion eyet.f'm . M1111lnwhilM, LAPD .ls workina on" $J million int.P.rim sy111t.A111 in order to b• abl• Lu toke odvantaao of the 4dditi~oal Jg ~Adin ,rAqut1ncie~ which . !JHLl<ER: • • ! I t J , l t i ' l t ' ; I RE SIDEN CE TEL:1-818-440-0214 Jul 15,92 11:45 No.002 P.2S 1..11c 1·v1., nas maae av'tJlablP. ~r., w,, won't lo:;"" 1.ltf~rn hy m1~~-fnr, 1 :h" l<JC)'l dA1trl.line. 1-'ortions 0£ th,at rcquo:.t az·" working its WllY throuah the proc,u,11--in fsct, the exempt . f.on nf t:hc posil.iuns nt1adAd 1n ASO woro juat approv.-d hy IIR&LR on 6/3/92. Funtf111 havo been sec. a»idA in t.he 92-93 budgat to pay (or those powitionR . The interim ayatAm would consist of tr~n"mitt.Grs And ~ecelvers lnr.HtAd on mountain topR throu1hout the city ~nd is supposed to impruv~ coveragA of all radio trequenci•u1. tt will provide fur commtmk11tions n~eds betw~en Officers in thA field and between detactiVAR ~nd detective haadquartar", usin1 tho new channel~, whfr.h should roliovo the ov•rloAd wht1~ the new infrastru~LurA f~ h~ing eonstructQd. Okay, okay, I know that thiM i~ mo~~ than you ever wanted to know ..... . • • • REPLACEMENT OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM Presentation to Members of the City Council November 12, 1991 and . ·November 15, 1991 • • • EMERGENCY COMMAND CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM PHASED REPLACEMENT/ENHANCEMENT FACT SHEET November 1991 The Emergency Command Control Communications System (ECCCS) is the Los Angeles Police Department's primary communications system. Its purpose is to provide rapid dispatch of citizen calls for service and to provide field police officers with instant access to numerous computerized law enforcement information systems. BACKGROUND Comouter-Aided Disoatch When ECCCS was designed, it was anticipated that the system would handle the Police Department's communications needs through the year 1990. By the time ECCCS became operational in 1983, the load placed on the system had exceeded all projections. This load was increased further in 1984, when the system assumed the role of 9-1-1 answer point for all fire and paramedic calls, in addition to all calls for police service and, by 1985, had surpassed the anticipated load handling capacity for the year 1990, consuming all of the reserve growth capacity designed into its components. The system is struggling to handle the current load and during peak peiiods of activity, major events, and unusual occurrences, portions of the system often fail. To begin addressing the shortcomings of ECCCS, the Police Department obtained $6 million in 1986 to fund the first phase upgrade of the host computers and Central Dispatch Center (CDC) consoles. A Request for Proposal to upgrade those components was released in February 1987, and a contract for $8.4 million was signed in December 1989. The host computer and CDC console upgrade is now underway. It was the initial intent of the Police Department to upgrade all of the components of ECCCS using a phased approach. Reconstruction of the Radio System In 1986, the Police Department began efforts to acquire additional radio frequencies to alleviate the severe congestis~ of existing police radio channels. In November 1988, the Department acquired Federal Communications Commission '(FCC) authorization to utilize an additional 39 duplex radio channeis. Authorization for the use of the additional frequencies is contingent upon full implementation of all 39 channels by the end of 1995. These channels are a finite resource and are irreplaceable. Failure to fund and implement systems on these channels will result in forfeiture of that resource to other law enforcement entities. Utilization of the additional channels required a substantial monetary investment which did not appear feasible to be funded through the normal City budgetary process . ---------- - - - - • • • Replacement of ECCCS Page Two Meanwhile, other portions of the communications system were rapidly deteriorating and failing to adequately meet the needs of the City and the Department. It was, therefore, necessary to continue with a phased upgrade of those components using available general funds. The magnitude of cost to implement the newly acquired channels, coupled with the need to ensure appropriate management of the technical and integration considerations, dictated the necessity of obtaining funding in a manner that would allow for a long-range, well planned, coordinated, professional implementation effort. To avoid being short-sighted, and recognizing that the City could not fund the additional and necessary upgrade phases through the normal budgetary process, it was felt that a bond proposal was the only way to adequately address those needs as a whole. Communications 2000 Bond Proposal The projects selected for this bond proposal were: I. II. Radio Eauioment Expansion/Reolacement Includes replacement of existing field and base station equipment, replacement of Mobile Digital Terminals (MDTs) and supporting equipment, and expansion of the Police Department's radio channel spectrum . Creation of Two Communications Sites Includes the development of a duplicate communications center located in the San Fernando Valley, and relocation of the existing metropolitan communications center. The total estimated cost of these projects was $234 million. This total included equipment services, applicable costs for related construction, and land acquisition. A six percent (6%) annual inflation rate was used to project future costs. Administrative cost information associated with bond debt management was provided by staff from the Office of the City Administrative Officer and included in the total amount requested. The bond proposal was presented to the voters in November ~99 0 , when it failed to receive the necessary two-thirds vot'er approval. It was subsequently placed on the ballot in April 1991, without change to the project or funding requirements. Once again the issue failed . • • • Replacement of ECCCS Page Three Since that time, much discussion has ensued regarding project and funding alternatives for the replacement/expansion of ECCCS, with the most urgent issues being hardware replacement and radio frequency expansion. Although single-point-of-failure and inadequate dispatch facilities are serious concerns, it is felt that there is neither money nor technology to satisfactorily address these issues at the present time. Also being discussed as a short-term solution is the refurbishment of the existing CDC located in City Hall East, and the rerouting of 9-1-1 calls to the Area of occurrence (via the California Call Management System offered by Pacific Bell) should the CDC fail. The following pages represent an alternative approach for the replacement/enhancement of ECCCS, broken into three phases by time periods. The first phase (Construction Phase, 1976-1984) details the development of the existing system. The second phase (Replacement Phase, 1985-1996) reflects those efforts currently in process, and those requiring immediate funding considerations due to critical dates such as the loading or losing of frequencies (by December 1995). Charts showing critical funding deadlines have been provided and represent the absolute final requirements for funding. The third phase (Enhancement Phase, 1997-2005) represents the effort to modernize ECCCS and bring it into the 21st century. It is in this phase that the alternate communications center will be built and the system may be redesigned to address new operational requirements of the Police Department in an attempt to better serve a rapidly growing and diverse City population . • • • Replacement of ECCCS Page Four IMPLEMENTATION PHASES The following provides an overview of the three implementation phases of the ECCCS replacement/enhancement. CONSTRUCTION PHASE (1976-1984) COST S52.5 MILLION This phase represents the existing communications system which was developed and implemented as follows: * Computer-Aided Dispatch * Voice and Digital Radio system * 9-1-1 Public Safety Answer Point REPLACEMENT PHASE (1985-1996) ESTIMATED COST $150 MILLION This phase is now under development. It represents the replacement of all the existing, inadequate equipment and computer programs within the present system. It also includes the necessary enhancement to activate the 39 new radio frequencies allocated to the Department by the FCC. This phase will be developed as follows: * Radio Backbone Replacement/Enhancement (Voice) * Handheld Radio Replacement * Digital Backbone Replacement (MDTs) * Computer-Aided Dispatch Computer Upgrade (Phase I Currently Funded) * Expand/Refurbish Central Dispatch Center * California Call Management * Phase III Consultant The Replacement Phase will be the focus for funding and staffing issues over the next ten years. Attached as Addendum are charts and supporting documents which outline each project in the Replacement Phase. The last chart represents the financial requirements on a yearly basis by project. ENHANCEMENT PHASE (1997-2005) ESTIMATED COST 5100 MILLTON This phase is an estimate of the expansion necessary to meet anticipated needs of the Department's communications system. * Replace Current Central Dispatch Center * Replace Mobile Digital Terminals/Radios * Modify Computer-Aided Dispatch to Address Integration with Crime and Arrest System $50 million $25 million $25 million NOTE: This phase may require a new approach for receiving and dispatching calls for service. It is essential that this phase be planned during implementation of the Replacement Phase. • ADDENDUM TO PHASED REPLACEMENT/ENHANCEMENT 1 e FACT SHEET • • • • Addendum, Page One REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS RADIO BACKBONE REPLACEMENT/ENHANCEMENT (VOICE) Issue/Status A Request for Proposal (RFP) is being prepared by an outside consultant and is scheduled for release in early 1992. This RFP will address the replacement criteria of existing backbone components (transmitters, receivers, etc.), and provide for the construction of the 39 new radio frequencies awarded to the Police Department in 1988 by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Two attempts to obtain funding (bond proposals) were unsuccessful. Benefits The radio backbone replacement/enhancement will provide: * Much needed replacement of existing radio infrastructure. * Retention of 39 new radio frequencies, giving the Department a total of 57 frequencies. * Improved audio quality and central radio control. * Long-term system benefits (including 2-to-l channel splitting and over-the-air .programming). * Greater voice traffic capacity as the Department grows . Impact of Failure to Fund Current backbone components are worn and need replacement. Failure to do so will result in degraded audio quality and an increase in system down time. Failure to build the new channels before the end of 1995 will result in the seizure of those channels by the FCC for redistribution. Without the new digital backbone, none of the advanced handheld radio features (including encryption) will be able to be implemented. Droo-Dead Fundina/Dates July 1992 - $30,000,000 July 1993 - $30,000,000 July 1994 - $30,000,000 This will only allow three years to complete the system before the frequencies will be seized by the FCC (December 1995). Three years is the minimum time required to construct and implement a system of this size . • • • Addendum, Page Two Issue/Status REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS HANDHELD RADIO REPLACEMENT The Department is currently under contract with Motorola, Inc., for a state-of-the-art analog/digital handheld radio, at a cost of $2,000 per unit. This radio will function on the Department's current analog backbone radio system, and provide easy migration to a digital backbone environment without requiring any handheld radio modifications or expense at a later date. The replacement schedule provides for delivery of the first 1,500 units by November 1991, and a total replacement of the Department's current handheld and mobile radios by the end of 1996. Benefits * Improved audio quality and range. * Operation in the 450-512 Mhz range. * 200 channel capacity. * Microprocessor controlled. * Over-the-air programming capability . * High quality encryption audio. * Operation in analog or digital modes. Impact of Failure to Fund The current handheld radio is no longer manufactured and replacement parts are unavailable. Failure to fund this will result in a rapid decline of the Department's radio inventory and the eventual loss of radio communications capabilities. Drop Dead Funding/Dates July 1991 - $4,100,000 currently funded for 1500 radios and accessories. .... 11.-em July 1992 - $5,650,000 required for 2131 radios and atcessories. July 1993 - $4,250,000 required for 1583 radios and accessories. July 1994 - $2,425,000 required for 903 radios and accessories. July 1995 - $2,400,000 required for 894 radios and accessories . • • • Addendum, Page Three REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS MOBILE DIGITAL TERMINAL BACKBONE REPLACEMENT/'MDTs Tssue/Status The Department's 1,000 Mobile Digital Terminals (MDTs) handle a significant amount of the communications and dispatching load. They are now overloaded, obsolete, and no longer manufactured. The direct replacement of MDTs with the current MDT model is no longer possible, necessitating replacement with units which provide adequate capacity and system growth potential. Benefits Replacement of existing equipment will provide the Department and the City of Los Angeles with a more reliable communications system, which will reduce the amount of down time and enhance both officer safety and service to the public. Impact of Failure to Fund The system will have to be abandoned . Droo Dead Funding/Dates July 1991 - $5,000,000 required for constructing radio sites for Central Bureau and 340 MDTs. July 1992 - $5,000,000 required for constructing radio sites for South Bureau and 340 MDTs. July 1993 - $5,000,000 required for constructing radio sites for Valley and West Bureaus and 340 MDTs . • • • Addendum, Page Four REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS EXPAND/REFURBISH CENTRAL DISPATCH CENTER Issue/Status The population growth of the City, combined with expansion of the Department, has resulted in an increased call load necessitating expansion of the CDC by an additional 20 consoles in order to operate effectively. The Central Dispatch Center (CDC) currently has 60 consoles and cannot accommodate the additional equipment and personnel requirements without extensive expansion. * Prior to the failure of Proposition J (1990), and Proposition 1 (1991), $6 million was allocated for CDC expansion in Proposition 2 (1988), the Police Facilities Construction Bond. Inflation of higher priority projects have depleted these funds and they are no longer available. However, the costs developed for the Replacement Phase should satisfy the expansion/refurbishment. Benefits CDC * Accommodate the radio frequency expansion and call load increase. * Improve working conditions, absenteeism, and attrition rate. Impact of Failure to Fund Responsiveness to the needs of the citizens of Los Angeles will continue to deteriorate. Drop Dead Fundina/Dates July 1992 - $5,000,000 Enhance/Expand Central Dispatch Center July 1993 - $5,000,000 Enhance/Expand Central Dispatch Center • • • • Addendum, Page Five Issue/Status REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS COMPUTER-AIDED DISPATCH COMPUTER UPGRADE Currently under contract with PRC, this project is addressing the need to rewrite existing Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system code for operation on a newer computer system, while maintaining the functionality of the present system. This will enable future expansion, and improved maintainability and support. Benefits The CAD System upgrade will provide: * System capacity improvement for future load increases. * Redesign and increase number of CDC Consoles. * Improved system maintainability and ease of enhancement. * Interface capability to intelligent MDTs and handheld radios. Imoact of Failure to Fund Current processors have far exceeded their useful and reliable lifespan. Failure to replace the existing equipment in a timely fashion will result in ever-increasing component down time and the inability to handle radio and MDT subsystem expansions. Also, due to the existing system overload, all proposed system enhancements would not be viable. Droo Dead Funding/Dates July 1989 - $8,500,000 funded for Phase I of the Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) Computer Upgrade - Contract #C-80542 - includes $100,000 contingency for contract change orders. July 1992 - $50,000 contingency required each year for contract change orders. July 1993 - $2,000,000 for Phase II CAD software upgrade required to support the radio system expansion, decentralizec incident creation and dispatch, and management information. Important to fund close to end of Phase II in order to not loose continuity . • • • Addendum, Page Six REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS CALIFORNIA CALL MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO AN ALTERNATE PSAP Issue/Status The current communications center does not have the backup capability to handle 9-1-1 calls should the current center be rendered uninhabitable. The current location is extremely vulnerable to disasters such as fire, flood, or earthquake. In the event that such an occurrence impacts the City Hall East facility, total failure of all police dispatching and 9-1-1 functions is probable. The California Call Management System (CCM) was developed to reroute incoming police calls in the event the Police Department's 9-1-1 telephone system fails. This system would require the caller to listen to a telephone recording and push (push button phones) or dial (rotary phones) a specific number depending on the type of emergency. The call would then be routed to a preselected number in the geographic Area where the call originated. The CCM has been approved by the Emergency Operations Board and presented to the State Department of Telecommunications for review and comment. The operational and technical issues of the CCM are currently being addressed by the involved telephone companies and will be reviewed by the Department of Telecommunications to insure reimbursement by the State. Benefits Although the CCM is not the most sophisticated approach, it will provide minimum level, interim backup to the 9-1-1 system and can be implemented within a short period of time. Impact of Failure to Fund The City will not be able to address the single-point-of-failure issue inherent in the current system. Droo Dead Funding Date July 1992 and subsequent years - $250,000 until another solution to the alternate Public Safety Answer Point is determined . • • • Addendum, Page Seven Issue/Status REPLACEMENT PHASE OF ECCCS PHASE III CONSULTANT In order to plan the most efficient method for the replacement/enhancement of ECCCS, the City must commit to hiring a consultant. Benefits The immediate funding of this effort will allow time for an adequate design to be accomplished and approved by the City. Imoact of Failure to Fund Failure to fund this effort will cause a continuing piece-meal approach to replacement, and will not allow for expansion or enhancement. Droo Dead Fundina Date July 1992-1995 - $150,000 yearly for consulting services . I ~] • 1111.1, 111111 1 /()ft,(: HAOIO ~,wvu~" • no\.tn lllfllllllC ... 11011 . / lll<:11>1 Allll 1 llAIICALI.( 111,'\Pl '.:ltllllll , - IIMJIO • curn,:111r.v 11111:,; 111 c..,,, 11111111 , . J,.1 ,·'', HJ11w111111 • 1ur·novt.o ,;r)',11111r.1 ~ l11111Ullf 5 ·,,, ,Ill) ~l'f) rs· ~ \ f 011 1'-'11111111 It ' Ill I If.I II Ill I w; / ,' j, / , -_,;_,- lltlf'' 51 IVII 11011'.i / - _: ·:_ ~ ·-.....,... . \ I _ i!,;; , _ ~ / H/\IJIO ~;WITCllll• H; 1,;4u11 1 MI•;rn cw~-:; COMPUTJm n1s1111r; nrr.lOIIAL COIIIIIY WMIIIMII s,qtu (r:W:.) OAIA 11,','.ir Ill ltllr ,'\U l'l!O\.lllr.s 11n,l1JIAI£. Ar.cr:ss run NI. r.n:r.s Ulf:IIAI. ltlnttllALS. I IY.1.0 AIIO ~101111.(. comtUNIC/\TIONS l'HOCli:SSOH DA IA 11N;ls: C:,\l _ tromu ... I AW [Ill OIICl.1 .lf II I • 111:1:rortAL HI F .r.ow. 11,111,;1111011-; ;, 'f';ll,II "'-1 (fl.~. f<;) 1' 110\ l(J(S AC:r.t 'iS I 111! . (' --- - . .. ·- • '; Ill 1( • IIAIIOIIAL ' -~~~· ""'·"""') 111[ t cccs uu:11 AL IUIUIIIAl.5. ~=-~~ - ---· 1 · -- -- ·~ MAIi~ 1•:c.:ccs l'H0CES8UH Cl I. IS ll ll"ll'"I S Clll-ll'U ll.H AIOU) UISPA ICII (<:.l\ll) SYSIU.1 - 1111. tll!Allt or r.cccs: Ill[ OIG11Al l(IUJIIIAI.S ~ OIO(Cf COIJUIIIIIC,'\11011 •:.....,~ , [I( f'M'JJI {CCCS AIIO \.f.lllCLI. S ~, 0~5 vt.lttClf S COllll'rto ·. nr_ r.fJ'tt.S AUIOIAAIIC lll'.il'Alf.111_'; omtcr Accrsi; 10 0.-.,,.,,11-;1: 1111 o. SIPICl( K(Y (lllltY Of' SIAll/5 ,'\IIU , _ ( 111( 111::Ml or ,: r.i:r.~-=-- 111rst lVIO llfl.lfllJS~ COIi IIIOl AJIO f:01111( CI Al L COU~ll/lllCA IIOIIS V , 1111111 H:cr.'.: (rxcu·, lll('f)l.111/C: Cl\1.1 . ~ I, AI.MIIAS). MIil All Olf;IJ>,L C:Ol~MVIIICAIIOIIS 'l,1111 SYSl[MS I.XII.Ill/AL 10 1.Ct:CS. ------- !~T/\IIIJIIY MAit~ 1,;n;c:-; l'HUCJ•:ssu H • l'IIOC[SS[S ~I.I. 111r.11,u11:; 111ru1 • \Tllll1£S 111r;1ur.11r All{lnr,-;s1 S • UMIAr.t.'.: >,t I. II ICIO(llf MIU ()l~r111e11 flLrS • "'·'"'"s Al.I. IIISIOnY fl,\l,'1 • r:0111r.1-; All. S'r'-lllJ :;11111,rrcs • ,:, Ill"" rr.s ~l'(r.lAL AIIII J' l_ llltllllG nU 1 Ull IS tur.nctur., "<SS<GI. S I:~ VOii I. STAIIIJIJY COMMlllllC:ATIOllS l'HOC:l':SSUH ~':';!~~~~,,e SlflOjll[tr.f" / Ah :·~~:~""" A1/ I --_ yQi(L__ I ---- / ____ _ ____ ___ _ _ ___ ___, _ _ ,-L -I (_j~"~/; ~' ,'~\~l ,_ Jl-l I ~~ \:(II(( ""'"o H.111.IUIAI. _r~1• , .. ~~'l- - ------- I ·---- l----l---- .l~ - ---- ---- --- -- I ---- I 1. ·--- --- --I , :. =~~:~ , ,- ------ , Atn.A CIJI.ILIAI IIJ Crl·l 11.PS (Aces) • lf}CAll.ll V-lllllrl 1111: r•o1.1u. 011I<:l.5 lllnOIJGllr)lll 1111: !:Ill' • Ul 1 11IIOIIS IIS ll[LIJ IIC11 \.1ll(S • CQll 111111(1\IS vo1cr. IIMJIO 1.101111011HIG All{) Accr.ss CHJIU~ (C!JC) _==-- --=-,~ '~--~ COi lSOLLS ------ ·- - --IE~ ----� ~ , - - --t:i -- - - ~;- ~l~~.,~ ,:~- ;;;~;~,--j E4Ull'Ml•:rn ~ ------ r - l'HIVATJ~ J\LAHW5 ) ... ___ __ -------- - -- ----- -•-p - - Ull J•:M 1,:m: 1rnc1 ·n:l.1·:t'IIUf-lJi: J ; ;q UJPM li:NT Lf.ll.lH;( I Jc·,· ILLU'I IUIIE l<JUIPl.11.111 • 911 1 .llr 11I:r.I,c·, cor11rw1. svs1r.u • ,'\IJHJIAAllt; C:1\11 . PISIIIIIIUIIOII (AW) 10 r.11r. Clllf~lll 1 .S • CAI.IS /11l;,'1,l llf.11 WIIIIIII 10 SJ,C:(IIIIIS • AIIIOIJA IIC lllll.Alll.n n111111f1r.A 11011 (AIII) Mm AIIIOI.IAllr. LOCAIIOfl ffll.llllrl!:AIICIII (1111) 1111'11 I IU l'nOClSSUII AIIO UISl'IA 11.0 Al COIISOI.['.; . f.cCC3 SwiEM-fi,O ii --- Cl IY or LOS AflGH[S . l>U' r. or llffO srnvicr..s-. l'.;U - Ul'E.ltA IIUIIS - UUll. - _ _ __ :.il_MS___::__JL9_ ~ ~ ;- • ECCCS FUNDING HISTORY 1976-1992 • REQUESTED RECEIVED 1976-81 $52.5 MILLION $52.5 MILLION BOND i987 85 MILLION ** 1988-89 8.7 MILLION 8.7 MILLION GENERAL FUND 1989-90 4 MILLION 4 MILLION GENERAL FUND 1990 235 MILLION 0 PROP J 1991 235 MILLION 0 PROP 1 1992 150 MILLION ? ? • ** Recommended-for Ballot, same time as Fire Dept. and Facility Bond ProposalsNot placed on ballot. • • • • IMMEDIATE LIFE CYCLE REPLACEMENT PHASE (1985 - 1996) ESTIMATED COST= $150 MILLION This phase is now under development. It represents the replacement of all existing, inadequate equipment and computer programs within the present system. It also includes the necessary enhancement to activate the 39 new radio frequencies allocated to the Department by the FCC. This phase will be developed as follows: * * * * * * * Radio Backbone Replacement / Enhancement (Voice) Handheld Radio Replacement Digital Backbone Replacement (MOT's) Expand & Enhance Central Dispatch Center & Voice Radio Switch Computer-Aided Dispatch Computer Upgrade. (Phase I Currently Funded) California Call Management (Alternate PSAP) Phase Ill Consultant • • LAPD ECCCS REPLACEMENT PHASE • 1985 - 1996 Deadlines for Funding of Phases & for Completion of Tasl<s July, 1991 July, 1992 July~ 1993 July, 1994 July, 1995 ~¢~i~M ~ =§( ':). 4\) BACKBONE RFP & Contract Phase I • Phase II MUST OR LOAD LOSE CHANNELS THEM Before Dec 1995 ~---- -t---- -----1 ·--- ------------· ---- - - HAND- HELD RADIOS • $ 4,100,'!'° • $5,650,000 • $4,250,000 - $2,425,000 - $2,400,000 l.!IJ UNITS 901 UNITS IM UNITS · TOTAL 90,000,000 18,825,000 _ , __ u __ OO_UNITS __ , ___ l,l __ l _ l _~ _ s - ----·t·--- ·-- 1- --------i MOBILE 15,000,000 ~~~~~~ALS Ir,::•()()() llt::•OOO ' •$w~~: ------~- ____ ....._ ___________ ,---------,-- ·---- -------1 CENTRAL DISPATCH CENTER COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH CALIFORNIA CALL MANAGEMENT Phase Ill Contractor TOTAL $8,500,000 l . .f::= :: ::::::::::::l,,. ** Phax I+ Maiutc:u.ancc 17,600,000 • $ 5,000,000 • $ 5,000,000 10,000,000 Expand&. Enhanco CDC Expand & Enhance CDC $ 50,000 .. $2,000,000 10,550,000 MaJntcn.ancc Phuc n + Mainren.aoce $250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 @ID Q© $ 250,000 1,000,000 AJmual O»t Annual eo.c $ 150 I 000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 ® @ $ 150,000 600,000 Cocwuldng Foo CONuldn1 Pee Cowruldns Foo Cc:wuiulting Fee 46,100,000 46,650,000 32,825,000 2,800,000 145,975,000 ----· ---------~-----~ - ------ ---- - ---- - -- --- --- -- - --- -- - - ·--------' • <1, 100,000 la currently runded lflder Contract# G - 81973 " 8,500,000 Is currently funded und&t' Contract I C - 80542 l - ~T-07- 81 _ 1 :J ~NOTASC. __

Linked assets

Los Angeles Webster Commission records, 1931-1992

Conceptually similar

PDF

LAPS communications assessment summary, 1992

PDF

Interview summaries, 1992

PDF

San Diego police department breakdown, 1992-07-17

PDF

Budgetary implications, 1992/1993

PDF

Baltimore county (Towson), statistical reports, 1991-1992

PDF

Las Vegas data chart, 1992-07

PDF

Las Vegas police department survey, 1992-07

PDF

Minneapolis correspondence, 1989-1992

PDF

Police department questionnaire log, 1992-08-06

PDF

USC security department crime / incident summary, 1992-04-29/1992-05-04

PDF

Interview, Hawthorne police department, 1992-06-25

PDF

LAPD's Wilshre area's response to incidents, 1992-04-05-01

PDF

Arnie Gerardo, interview, 1992-06-23

PDF

San Francisco questionnaires, 1992-07-24

PDF

Tampa questionnaires, 1992-07-24

PDF

Phoenix questionnaires, 1992-07-24

PDF

Las Vegas questionnaires, 1992-07

PDF

Pittsburgh department of public safety bureau, statistical report, 1991-1992

PDF

Santa Ana police department materials, 1990-1992

PDF

Arlington questionnaire, 1992-07-24

Description

Collection of data summarized to show additiona sworn positions and upgrades, race and gender breakdowns of sworn officers, deployment figures, Los Angeles Police Department fleet inventory, rover statistics, funding equipment and cars, 1992.

Asset Metadata

Core Title Data summaries, 1992

Tag OAI-PMH Harvest

Format 37 p. (format), application/pdf (imt), raw data (aat), summaries (aat)

Permanent Link (DOI) https://doi.org/10.25549/webster-c100-64104

Unique identifier UC11426868

Identifier box 30 (box),web-box30-15-03.pdf (filename),folder 15 (folder),webster-c100-64104 (legacy record id)

Legacy Identifier web-box30-15/web-box30-15-03.pdf

Dmrecord 64104

Format 37 p. (format),application/pdf (imt),raw data (aat),summaries (aat)

Type texts