University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses

Encoding counter-memories: artificial intelligence as a tool for APIA community empowerment

(USC Thesis Other)

Encoding counter-memories: artificial intelligence as a tool for APIA community empowerment

PDF

Download a page range

Download transcript

Copy asset link

Request this asset

Transcript (if available)

Content Copyright 2025 Paul Kim
Encoding Counter-Memories:
Artificial Intelligence as a Tool
for APIA Community Empowerment
by
Paul Kim
A Thesis Presented to the
FACULTY OF THE USC SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
In Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree
MASTER OF HERITAGE CONSERVATION/
MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + URBANISM
May 2025

ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis committee members:
Aroussiak Gabrielian, Cindy Olnick, Meredith Drake Reitan, and Trudi Sandmeier. I
appreciate your guidance in helping me narrow down my ambitious ideas into a more
focused and accessible project. I am grateful to the faculty and fellow students in the
Landscape Architecture and Heritage Conservation programs—their knowledge and
work inspired me to explore new connections between these disciplines. Special thanks
to all my friends, who offered invaluable feedback on this work, kept me caffeinated and
well-fed, and provided the reality checks I needed along the way. Finally, to my family—
thank you for your unwavering support throughout this journey, and for understanding
when I needed to focus on this work.

iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... ii
List of Figures............................................................................................................................... v
Preface .......................................................................................................................................... ix
Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1
Narratives and Counter-Memory in APIA Heritage..........................................................................1
Evolution from AI and GenAI.............................................................................................................. 3
The Potential of Generative AI............................................................................................................6
Ethical Considerations...........................................................................................................................11
GenAI at the Intersection ....................................................................................................................14
Chapter Overview .................................................................................................................................17
Chapter 1.......................................................................................................................................20
APIA in Los Angeles ........................................................................................................................... 20
APIA Narratives................................................................................................................................... 29
APIA Challenges.................................................................................................................................. 34
APIA Identity in the Digital Age ....................................................................................................... 38
Spaces of Memory and Resistance..................................................................................................... 43
Chapter 2...................................................................................................................................... 49
Counter-Memory .................................................................................................................................49
Memoricide and Counter-Memory ................................................................................................... 54
Counter-Memory Using GenAI......................................................................................................... 62
Storytelling + GenAI ...........................................................................................................................68
Challenges and Considerations, As Predicted.................................................................................. 77
Collective Intelligence ..........................................................................................................................81
Chapter 3 ..................................................................................................................................... 84
Asian Futurism ..................................................................................................................................... 85
Counter-Memory Through Asian Futurism .................................................................................... 88
Techno-Orientalsim.............................................................................................................................96
Creating “Groundedness” Using GenAI...........................................................................................101
Afro-Asian Intersectionality ..............................................................................................................107
Reclamation as Counter-Memory......................................................................................................117

iv
Community-Led GenAI Development............................................................................................. 122
Chapter 4 .................................................................................................................................... 126
A Case for GenAI in Landscape Architecture.................................................................................126
Landscape Aesthetics vs. Cultural Landscapes ...............................................................................129
Generative Synesthesia.......................................................................................................................135
Reclaiming Narratives: GenAI as Community Tool......................................................................139
Geolocated Social Media Analysis using GenAI............................................................................. 142
APPLICATION: APIA Heritage ......................................................................................................148
CASE STUDY: Planning and Design...............................................................................................153
APPLICATION 2: Production of Counter-Memories...................................................................157
Community-Informed GenAI Process for Visualization...............................................................160
APIA heritage in the digital age: Balancing Technology and Community................................ 161
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................. 163
Critical Issues and Challenges...........................................................................................................164
Implications for Quantum Breakthrough........................................................................................165
APIA Leadership in AI Development ..............................................................................................167
Technical and Resource Challenges................................................................................................ 169
Future Direction...................................................................................................................................171
Things to Consider .............................................................................................................................173
Bibliography...............................................................................................................................176
Appendices................................................................................................................................ 209
APPENDIX 1: Mixing – Lesson Plan............................................................................................... 209
APPENDIX 2: Prompt Engineering ................................................................................................. 215
APPENDIX 3: Building a Music Mixing web-based App using claude.ai...................................224
APPENDIX 4: Ai-powered story-based Role-Playing Game ........................................................272
APPENDIX 5: Sample of GenAI-Assisted Lesson Planning.........................................................283
The Family Flavors: Digital Storytelling Workshop..................................................................283

v
1. LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 0.1: Images - Two AI-generated Portaits, Chinatown......................................................2
Fig. 0.2: Images - Two AI-generated Scenes of Los Angeles Chinatown .............................2
Fig. 0.3: Diagram - Components of Artificial Intelligence ..................................................... 4
Fig. 0.4: Collection of AI-generated “Slop” Art ....................................................................... 8
Fig. 1.1: The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Chapter 126 ....................................................... 21
Fig. 1.2: Photograph - Gin Wong’s Modernist Gas Station in Los Angeles........................23
Fig. 1.3: Portrait of Architect Gin D. Wong, FAIA.................................................................23
Fig. 1.4: Map of APIA Enclaves in Los Angeles......................................................................24
Fig. 1.5: Diagram of AAPI Population Growth in San Gabriel Valley.................................25
Fig. 1.6: Image - The Magic Washer, Manufactured by Geo. Dee, Dixon, Illinois................. 31
Fig. 1.7: Diagram - Racial Triangulation Theory....................................................................32
Fig. 1.8: Photograph of Thai American Community Members............................................33
Fig. 1.9: Screenshot of Little Tokyo ..........................................................................................35
Fig. 1.10: Screenshot of Seattle’s International District/Chinatown .....................................35
Fig. 1.11: Screenshot of Historypin Database............................................................................42
Fig. 1.12: Screenshot of AI-generated Role-Playing Game.....................................................43
Fig. 1.13: Screenshot of Sequential Text-to-Image Generation Results, 1 of 4 ................... 47
Fig. 1.14: Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio Results, 2 of 4 ......................................... 47
Fig. 1.15: Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio Results, 3 of 4 ......................................... 48
Fig. 1.16: Screenshot of Microsoft Copilot Studio Results, 4 of 4......................................... 48
Fig. 2.1: Album Cover for Wu-Tang Clan’s Enter The Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)............... 50
Fig. 2.2: Cover Page of Don’t Believe the Hype......................................................................... 51
Fig. 2.3: Photograph - Outdoor Dining Scene in Chinatown. ..............................................55
Fig. 2.4: Photograph - Elderly Woman in Red Jacket ............................................................55
Fig. 2.5: Images - Two AI-generated Interpretations of Chinatown .................................. 56
Fig. 2.6: Photograph - Exterior View of Barrack Under Construction. ...............................57

vi
Fig. 2.7: Photograph - Japanese American Families...............................................................57
Fig. 2.8: Comparative View, Transformation of Old Chinatown........................................ 59
Fig. 2.9: Panoramic View of Gintong Kasaysayan, Gintong Pamana Mural .....................61
Fig. 2.10: Screenshot of Word of Mouth.................................................................................. 63
Fig. 2.11: Screenshot of Holiday Mandu-making Workshop................................................. 63
Fig. 2.12: Image - AI-generated Rendering of Soon Tofu Stew ........................................... 66
Fig. 2.13: Photograph - Soon Tofu Stew at Beverly Soon Tofu Restaurant....................... 66
Fig. 2.14: Screenshots of Curationist.org Website ................................................................... 71
Fig. 2.15: Screenshot - Human-AI Co-dancing Project ..........................................................72
Fig. 3.1: Collection of Urban Artworks by Xeme.................................................................... 87
Fig. 3.2: Selection of Artworks by Chip7 ................................................................................. 88
Fig. 3.3: Illustration - Silkpunk Airship ....................................................................................91
Fig. 3.4: Cover Art of The Veiled Throne................................................................................91
Fig. 3.5: Screenshot - New Port City skyline from Ghost in the Shell ..................................96
Fig. 3.6: Comparison Study of Qipao in Films.......................................................................99
Fig. 3.7: Image of Major Kusanagi, Scarlett Johansson in Ghost in the Shell.....................101
Fig. 3.8: Artwork - East vs. West .............................................................................................. 102
Fig. 3.9: Artwork - Home Field LA .......................................................................................... 103
Fig. 3.10: Photograph of Gajin Fujita ...................................................................................... 103
Fig. 3.11: Artwork - #WTF........................................................................................................ 103
Fig. 3.12: Photograph of Dana Davenport..............................................................................106
Fig. 3.13: Image of Voice of the Dragon: Once Upon a Time in Chinese America.................110
Fig. 3.14: Photograph of Work (Water) (Sadamasa Motonaga) ........................................... 112
Fig. 3.15: Photograph of R.S.V.P. I. (Senga Nengudi)........................................................... 113
Fig. 4.1: Photograph of Asian Fishermen............................................................................... 130
Fig. 4.2: Photograph of Various Types of Abalone and Bone Fishhooks...........................132
Fig. 4.3: Photograph of Shell Midden......................................................................................132
Fig. 4.4: Image of AI-generated Pachappa Camp................................................................. 137

vii
Fig. 4.5: Image - Variation Using Stable Diffusion XL ........................................................ 137
Fig. 4.6: Image - Variation Using Stable Diffusion XL, 16:9 Ratio..................................... 137
Fig. 4.7: Image of 3D Reconstruction of Bunker Hill Neighborhood ................................ 138
Fig. 4.8: Image of Voxel Synthesis and Completion from Satellite Imagery.................... 138
Fig. 4.9: Images - Two AI-generated Conceptual Design....................................................141
Fig. 4.10: Image - Visualization of the Landscape Aesthetic Flow ..................................... 144
Fig. 4.11: Images - Comparative Analysis of LA-Capacity and LA-Flow........................... 145
Fig. 4.12: Screenshot from Google Maps................................................................................146
Fig. 4.13: Photograph of James Irvine Japanese Garden...................................................... 150
Fig. 4.14: Photograph of Japanese Tea House at Storrier Stearns Japanese Garden....... 150
Fig. 4.15: Images of AI-generated Japanese-style garden, 1 of 2...........................................151
Fig. 4.16: Image of AI-generated Japanese-style garden, 2 of 2............................................151
Fig. 4.17: Comparison of Semi-Realistic Rendering of Shoreline Dune ............................ 154
Fig. 4.18: Images - AI-generated Landscape Depicting Summer and Winter................... 156
Fig. 4.19: Image of AI-generated Portrait Simulating Terminal Island Resident............. 158
Fig. 5.1: Photograph of Google Quantum AI Cooling System for Willow chip...............166
Fig. 5.2: Photograph of Willow Quantum Computer Chip.................................................166
Fig. 5.3: Screenshot of AI Facial Recognition Error............................................................. 173

viii
2. ABSTRACT
This research aims to shed light on the transformative potential of generative artificial
intelligence (genAI) to create counter-memories that document and amplify marginalized
histories of Asian Pacific Islander American (APIA) communities in Los Angeles. By examining
genAI through frameworks of Asian Futurism and counter-memory, the study investigates how
this technology can challenge dominant narratives while supporting APIA communities in
preserving their cultural heritage and landscapes.
The study investigates:
• How genAI can serve as a redistributive technology by making heritage conservation and
landscape architecture more accessible to APIA communities historically excluded from
controlling their own narratives
• The role of community-led genAI development in ensuring these tools resist rather than
reinforce techno-Orientalist stereotypes and biases
• The intersection of landscape aesthetics and cultural landscapes in representing APIA
experiences through genAI-assisted visualization
• The inherent tensions between genAI’s capacity to process vast amounts of data and its
tendency to perpetuate encoded racial biases and cultural erasure
While genAI offers unprecedented capabilities for preserving and sharing APIA experiences,
this study reveals significant challenges including algorithmic bias, limited access to
computational resources, and questions of data sovereignty. The research emphasizes that
meaningful implementation requires APIA communities to actively confront and correct
inaccurate data and narratives, even as they leverage these emerging technologies.
This work contributes to understanding how marginalized communities can harness genAI’s
capabilities while actively resisting technological hegemony and working toward more equitable
representation in both physical and digital spaces.

ix
3. PREFACE
WILL WE SURVIVE OUR WORST HABITS?
When a student challenged Octavia E. Butler on “what’s the answer” to solving the kind
of trouble we’re going to experience in the future, she replied, “There’s no single answer that
will solve all our future problems. There’s no magic bullet. Instead, there are thousands of
answers—at least. You can be one of them if you choose to be.”1 And when the same student
misquoted Butler’s response as, “There isn’t one,” this prompted her to write an essay in 2000 for
Essence magazine as a way to clarify the meaning of her response and to offer insight on the
intricacies of looking ahead “at what we can and cannot know.”2
The rules laid out in the essay, “A Few Rules for Predicting the Future,” are as follows:
1 Octavia E. Butler, “Brave New Worlds: A Few Rules for Predicting the Future,” Essence, May 2000, 164–
66.
2 Butler, “Brave New Worlds: A Few Rules for Predicting the Future.”
Learn from the Past: “To study history is to study humanity. And to try to
foretell the future without studying history is like trying to
learn to read without bothering to learn the alphabet.”
Respect the Laws of Consequences: “I don’t believe we can do anything at all without side
effects—also known as unintended consequences.”
Be Aware of Your Perspective: “We probably will do those things someday, but I never
imagined that it would take as long as it has. Moral:
Wishful thinking is no more help in predicting the future
than fear, superstition or depression.”
Count on the Surprises: “No matter how hard we try to foresee the future, there are
always these surprises. The only safe prediction is that there
always will be.”

1
0) INTRODUCTION
This thesis explores the potential of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) in
uncovering, preserving, and disseminating narratives that have been historically
marginalized or overlooked. It does so through the lens of Asian and Pacific Islander
American (APIA) communities in Los Angeles. The primary research question is: Can
genAI technology be used to create and amplify counter-memories of APIA
communities in Los Angeles? This question prompts us to consider how machine
learning algorithms analyze vast archives of historic documents, photographs, and oral
histories to reveal new insights into APIA experiences and contributions to Los Angeles’
development.
NARRATIVES AND COUNTER-MEMORY IN APIA HERITAGE
Various APIA diaspora groups have been integral to Los Angeles’ economic and
cultural landscape since the mid-1800s, contributing significantly to the city’s
development and diversity.3 However, they often remain perceived as perpetual
foreigners, excluded from full civic integration. APIA communities are also often
described as a monolith, obscuring their distinct histories, cultures, and contributions.
The advent of genAI has reinforced these inaccurate narratives, with highly biased
systems and sources creating stereotypical representations like those below.
At the same time, genAI presents a novel avenue for creating counter-memories—
digital narratives that challenge dominant historic accounts and offer alternative
chronicles—with its ability to synthesize and reinterpret historic information across
multiple unstructured data sources.
3 Los Angeles City Planning, “Ethnic-Cultural Contexts | Los Angeles City Planning” (Lacity.gov, 2024),
https://planning.lacity.gov/preservation-design/historic-resources/ethnic-cultural-contexts.

2
Fig. 0.1: (top) Two AI-generated portraits depicting people in Los Angeles Chinatown. (Microsoft Copilot,
March 21, 2024, https://copilot.microsoft.com/). Prompt: ‘portrait of a person in Chinatown, Los Angeles.’
Fig. 0.2: (bottom) Two AI-generated scenes of Los Angeles Chinatown. (DALL-E 3, March 21, 2024,
https://copilot.microsoft.com/). Prompt: ‘image of Chinatown in Los Angeles.’
Within this complex context, counter-memory enables marginalized
communities to resist everyday memoricide,4 “the [normalization] of memory erasure as
mundane practice.”5 This practice of preserving and asserting alternative narratives
allows communities to reclaim their rightful place in the city’s past, present, and future.
As articulated by Michel Foucault and further developed by scholars like George Lipsitz,
counter-memory refers to the act of remembering what dominant narratives seek to
overlook or suppress. For APIA communities in the Greater Los Angeles area, counter4 Erasure that largely (and gradually) takes place within everyday contexts that has been “[normalized] as
taken-for-granted processes or is otherwise explicitly legitimated through narratives of human progress” 5 Scott Webster, “Revisiting Memoricide: The Everyday Killing of Memory,” Memory Studies, July 2023, 1–
21, https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231184564.

3
memory serves as a means to challenge stereotypes, reclaim their histories, and envision
futures where their experiences and contributions are fully recognized and valued.
EVOLUTION FROM AI AND GENAI
Since Alan Turing’s groundbreaking work on computer intelligence in the 1950s,
artificial intelligence has transformed numerous sectors through technological
advancements and operational efficiencies.6 Traditional artificial intelligence (AI) and
generative artificial intelligence (genAI) represent distinct approaches to machine
learning, each offering unique capabilities and applications. The fundamental
distinction lies in their core capabilities—AI systems analyze and predict using
structured, labeled data to produce specific outcomes, and genAI can create entirely new
content while maintaining similarities to its training data. As Bernard Marr explains in
the article, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy
Explanation for Anyone” (2023), “[AI] can analyze data and tell you what it sees, but
[genAI] can use that same data to create something entirely new.”7
Traditional AI, also known as Narrow or Weak AI, is optimized for performing
specific tasks through pattern recognition and prediction.
8 It employs machine learning
algorithms trained on datasets that enable computers to understand information, learn
from it, and make decisions. This technology excels at tasks like filtering spam emails,
forecasting quarterly sales figures, and optimizing delivery routes. AI systems require
initial human direction to verify and validate decisions, gradually improving accuracy
through increased data exposure and typically employ straightforward machine learning
models such as decision trees or basic neural networks.9
6 Tom Taulli, Generative AI, 1st ed. (Apress, 2023), 199, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9367-6.
7 Bernard Marr, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation For
Anyone” (Forbes, July 24, 2023), https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/07/24/the-differencebetween-generative-ai-and-traditional-ai-an-easy-explanation-for-anyone/. 8 Marr, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation For Anyone.”
9 Taulli, Generative AI, 47–76.

4
The emergence of genAI represents a more sophisticated evolution in AI
capabilities. Since the release of user-friendly genAI services in late 2022, genAI has
demonstrated remarkable abilities in producing human-like text, code, images, music,
and content transformation between different forms.10 To accomplish this, it uses
sophisticated models like transformers and diffusion models to generate novel content
based on patterns learned from training data. For instance, while a traditional AI system
can efficiently classify images of cats and dogs, a genAI system can create entirely new,
original images of cats, dogs, or even combinations of both. This creative capability is
what sets genAI apart from AI’s analytical and decision-making focus.

Fig. 0.3: Components of Artificial Intelligence. (Diagram from Akshay Kulkarni et al., Applied Generative
AI for Beginners: Practical Knowledge on Diffusion Models, ChatGPT, and Other LLMs [Berkeley, CA:
Apress, 2023], https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9994-4). The hierarchical relationship between AI and its
subfields shows how generative AI fits within the broader landscape of artificial intelligence technologies.
The boundary between genAI and AI is not always clear-cut, as many systems
combine both generative and analytical capabilities. Instead, the architectural
differences between the two technologies significantly influence their applications.
11 For
10 Akshay Kulkarni et al., Applied Generative AI for Beginners: Practical Knowledge on Diffusion Models,
ChatGPT, and Other LLMs (Apress, 2023), 4–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9994-4. 11 Marr, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation For Anyone.”

5
instance, a chatbot might use AI for understanding user intent and context, while
employing genAI to craft responses. What fundamentally distinguishes genAI is its
primary purpose of creating new content rather than just processing or analyzing
existing information. This creative capability is what has driven recent excitement
around tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, Claude, and similar systems that can generate
human-like text, realistic images, professional quality tracks,12 and other forms of
content.
These architectural differences fundamentally shape their practical applications.
While AI, with its simpler machine learning models like decision trees and basic neural
networks, remains deeply embedded in critical business operations and decision-making
processes, genAI uses more sophisticated architectures trained on massive datasets to
enable content creation across multiple domains.
13 This expanded capability has opened
new frontiers across creative fields, from platforms like Stable Diffusion and Sora that
generate visual contents to advanced tools for text generation and voice synthesis.
However, both technologies share a common foundation in neural networks and
deep learning—the key difference lies in how these technologies are applied. While AI
continues to be vital for many analytical applications, genAI’s ability to generate novel
content potentially represents the next major evolution in artificial intelligence
capabilities.
Looking forward, both AI and genAI have crucial roles to play as well as facing
similar challenges regarding ethical implementation, potential biases, and the need for
human oversight. While they excel at their respective tasks—AI in analysis and decisionmaking, genAI in creation and innovation—neither can fully replace human creativity,
12 Popular web-based AI music generator like Udio: https://www.udio.com/
13 Marr, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation For Anyone.”

6
empathy, and critical thinking. Instead, they serve as tools that, when properly
implemented, can enhance human capabilities across various domains.
Marr suggests these technologies are not mutually exclusive—they could work in
tandem, with AI analyzing data and genAI creating personalized content based on those
analyses.14 This combination could potentially revolutionize industries where both
analysis and creation are valuable.
THE POTENTIAL OF GENERATIVE AI
Since the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in late 2022, conversations about the
prevalence of genAI have become ubiquitous. These discussions span a wide spectrum,
from apocalyptic to mystical, with various sectors grappling with whether and how to
engage with this technology. While these conversations center on questioning the pros
and cons, the crucial point is to recognize and understand how genAI is already
reshaping existing systems. Unfortunately, many of these questions, often rooted in a
limited scope of understanding, prove counterproductive. The reality is that genAI
technology is here, and its reach will continue to expand regardless of our opinions, for
better or worse.
A recent study by Ebba Lundberg and Peter Mozelius, “The potential effects of
deepfakes on news media and entertainment” (2024), highlights this duality—while
genAI offers creative possibilities, it also poses serious risks to credibility and social
trust.15 Lundberg and Mozelius emphasize that the impact of genAI technology extends
far beyond simple content creation, fundamentally altering how we engage with and
trust digital media, while also warning that AI-generated content could cause
14 Marr, “The Difference Between Generative AI And Traditional AI: An Easy Explanation For Anyone.”
15 Ebba Lundberg and Peter Mozelius, “The potential effects of deepfakes on news media and
entertainment,” AI & SOCIETY, October 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02072-1.

7
“psychological, financial and social harm” to both individuals and institutions through
various forms of manipulation and disinformation.
16
This transformation and its disruptive potential are particularly evident in
creative fields, where content created using genAI behaves remarkably similar to an
invasive species in a natural ecosystem.17 In “AI Art & the Commercial Value of Images”
(2023), Jeff Barry reframes this conversation by arguing that the anxiety surrounding AI
technology stems not from its creative potential, but from concerns about the
commercial value of AI-generated content. Barry critiques our tendency to equate
artistic value with market value, noting how AI art has emerged as a digital invasive
species that is fundamentally altering the creative landscape, forcing artists and creators
to adapt or risk displacement.18
In the Washington Post article, “The deluge of bonkers AI art is literally surreal”
(2024), Maura Judkins further illustrates this phenomenon, documenting how AIgenerated content has flooded social media with what industry experts term “slop”—
generally low-quality but highly proliferative content that, like aggressive invasive
species, overwhelms existing digital ecosystems through sheer volume rather than
superior quality.19 This rapid proliferation of AI-generated contents is evident across
platforms like DeviantArt, TikTok, and Spotify gaining millions of clicks and becoming
deeply embedded in social media trends, despite significant concerns from human
creators about their impact on artistic integrity and fair compensation.20 This integration
has become so thorough that, like established invasive species in natural environments,
AI-generated content has become nearly impossible to separate from the digital
16 Lundberg and Mozelius, “The potential effects of deepfakes on news media and entertainment.”
17 Jeff Barry, “AI Art & the Commercial Value of Images” (The Metaverse is Open, January 2023),
https://newsletter.metaverseisopen.com/p/ai-art-and-the-commercial-value-of. 18 Barry, “AI Art & the Commercial Value of Images.”
19 Maura Judkis, “The Deluge of Bonkers AI Art Is Literally Surreal” (The Washington Post, June 2024),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/of-interest/2024/06/30/ai-art-facebook-slop-artificial-intelligence/. 20 Amanda Hoover, “Spotify Has an AI Music Problem—but Bots Love It” (Wired, May 2023),
https://www.wired.com/story/spotify-ai-music-robot-listeners/.

8
ecosystem it has transformed, regardless of its potential detriment to original content
creators and established creative practices.
Fig. 0.4: Collection of AI-generated “slop” art. (AI-generated images published in Maura Judkis, “The
Deluge of Bonkers AI Art Is Literally Surreal,” The Washington Post, June 30, 2024,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/of-interest/2024/06/30/ai-art-facebook-slop-artificial-intelligence/).
The collection of AI-generated images exemplifies the surreal aesthetic that has become known as “slop
art” on social media platforms.
Moving beyond binary debates about AI’s merits and drawbacks, this research
adopts a critical framework to examine how genAI can be used as a tool for narrative
reclamation and counter-memory creation by APIA communities in Los Angeles.
Rather than weighing advantages against disadvantages, this approach interrogates how
genAI’s capabilities can be thoughtfully integrated into preserving and reimagining
APIA heritage through community-led initiatives. While acknowledging genAI’s
current limitations—relative infancy, potential for perpetuating biases, and need for

9
vigilant fact-checking—the focus shifts to exploring its unique advantages over
traditional archival and preservation methods.
The advancement in specialized technologies offers unprecedented opportunities
for cultural preservation and understanding. From machine learning algorithms
analyzing vast historic datasets to genAI models creating visual reconstructions of lost
architectural sites, these technologies are revolutionizing our approach to studying and
preserving cultural landscapes and heritage.21 Unlike conventional digital databases or
archival methods, genAI can simultaneously analyze massive amounts of disparate data,
ranging from oral histories and individual narratives to historic documents and cultural
artifacts, while identifying subtle patterns and other connections that human researchers
might overlook.
GenAI tools are already employed in the fields of heritage conservation and
landscape architecture to question how this technology can influence the future of both
fields. Examples include exploration and experimentation in the practices of
memorialization and remembrance of past atrocities,22 interpretation of cultural heritage
values,23 and establishment of ethical frameworks for the assessment, application, and
implementation of these algorithms.24
Beyond documentation, genAI can empower communities to actively participate
in the design process by translating their cultural knowledge and preferences into design
21 Arkaprabha Basu et al., “Digital Restoration of Cultural Heritage with Data-Driven Computing: A
Survey,” IEEE Access 11 (May 2023): 53939–77, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3280639. 22 Mykola Makhortykh et al., “Shall Androids Dream of Genocides? How Generative AI Can Change the
Future of Memorialization of Mass Atrocities,” Discover Artificial Intelligence 3 (July 2023),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6.
23 Dirk H. R. Spennemann, “ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born ‘Knowledge’: How Does a
Generative AI Language Model Interpret Cultural Heritage Values?,” Knowledge 3 (September 2023): 480–
512, https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3030032.
24 S. Pansoni et al., “Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Heritage: Design and Assessment of an Ethical
Framework,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
Sciences, vol. XLVIII-M-2–2023 (2023): 1149-55, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-2-2023-1149-
2023.

10
elements. For instance, genAI could produce design alternatives that incorporate
specific cultural elements identified by community members, such as creating spaces
that accommodate multi-generational gatherings or traditional festivals while meeting
modern urban planning requirements. This community-led approach can transform
cultural preservation from a top-down exercise into an active process driven by those
whose heritage is being preserved.
For APIA communities in Los Angeles, the increasing prevalence and
accessibility of genAI tools in cultural preservation open new avenues for exploration
and representation, while also raising poignant questions about their implementation
and impact. In traditional planning and design processes, community input is often
limited to formal meetings or surveys, which exclude many APIA voices due to language
barriers, work schedules, cultural differences, and other factors that prohibit meaningful
community participation. GenAI can break down these barriers by simultaneously
processing multiple forms of community knowledge: oral histories in various APIA
languages, historic photographs from family archives, business records from multigenerational establishments, and documented patterns of cultural practices in public
spaces.
Most importantly, genAI represents a form of redistributive technology by
making heritage conservation, landscape architecture, and related fields more accessible
to APIA communities who have historically been excluded from controlling their own
narratives. Instead of having their stories filtered through intermediaries and outside
institutions, community members could share their experiences in their native
languages, with genAI tools helping to make these stories accessible to broader
audiences while preserving their original cultural context. For instance, Japanese
American communities could use genAI to compile and analyze personal accounts of
internment experiences—with the help of community-based organizations like Japanese
American National Museum and Little Tokyo Community Council—creating a

11
community-generated and owned historic record that is closer to firsthand experiences
than official government narratives.
Popular genAI programs and services, such as ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Stable
Diffusion, have already simplified their user interface, allowing people to generate
content through natural language prompts. This capability is especially important for
intergenerational and interracial knowledge transfer. Younger APIA generations can
access their heritage through both their ancestral languages and English, maintaining
cultural connections that might otherwise have been lost. Leveling the field of historic
preservation through genAI technology not only ensures more genuine representation
but also empowers communities to actively participate in shaping how their histories are
remembered and understood.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
GenAI technology presents both opportunities and challenges in preserving and
amplifying APIA heritage, identity, and experiences, particularly for marginalized
communities. While this technology offers powerful tools for creating countermemories and enhancing preservation efforts, its implementation requires careful
consideration of existing biases, ethical implications, and representation issues.
As highlighted in “The Road Ahead: Emerging Trends, Unresolved Issues, and
Concluding Remarks in Generative AI” (2024), Balasubramaniam S., Vanajaroselin
Chirchi, Seifedine Kadry et al. identify significant challenges in developing genAI
systems, including lack of diversity in leadership roles,25 encoded racial bias in digital
25 Erin Griffith, “Silicon Valley Slides Back into ‘Bro’ Culture,” The New York Times, September 24, 2022,
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/technology/silicon-valley-slides-back-into-bro-culture.html.

12
systems,26 and substantial resource barriers that may exclude marginalized communities
from participation in development processes.27
The rapid proliferation of genAI across multiple sectors necessitates a carefully
considered approach to technology development. While the potential for innovation is
significant, the ethical challenges are equally substantial, particularly regarding
deepfakes and potential misuse. As Hamed, Zachara-Szymanska, and Wu in
“Safeguarding authenticity for mitigating the harms of generative AI” (2024) emphasize,
the field requires comprehensive detection frameworks and responsible use guidelines
that can evolve alongside these advancing technologies.28
The ethical considerations extend beyond technical implementation to
encompass broader societal impacts that demand careful consideration and scrutiny.
Critical concerns include the need for thoughtful and ethical implementation, the
importance of diverse representation in development teams, and the necessity of
community-centered approaches that prioritize perspectives of frontline communities.
The authors emphasize that these challenges are compounded by the substantial
resource required for developing large language models, which can perpetuate existing
inequities through both their training data and development processes.29
Training genAI models on cultural content requires extraordinary care and
collaborative engagement. Success depends on the direct involvement of community
members, leaders, cultural experts, historians, and key stakeholders to mitigate
26 Faith Karimi, “People of Color Have a New Enemy: Techno-Racism” (CNN, May 2021),
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/09/us/techno-racism-explainer-trnd/index.html.
27 Siddharth Suri, “Defining Our Future with Generative AI,” Nature Computational Science 4 (September
2024): 641–43, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00694-5.
28 Ahmed Abdeen Hamed, Malgorzata Zachara-Szymanska, and Xindong Wu, “Safeguarding Authenticity
for Mitigating the Harms of Generative AI: Issues, Research Agenda, and Policies for Detection, FactChecking, and Ethical AI,” iScience 27 (February 2024): 108782, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.108782.
29 Balasubramaniam S. et al., “The Road Ahead: Emerging Trends, Unresolved Issues, and Concluding
Remarks in Generative AI—A Comprehensive Review,” ed. Eugenio Vocaturo, International Journal of
Intelligent Systems 2024 (September 2024): 31–34, https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4013195.

13
misrepresentation. This approach transcends mere data collection, fostering
collaborative dialogue that respects the agency and lived experiences of APIA
populations. Hamed et al. stress the urgent need for “effective detection, verification,
and explainability mechanisms to counteract potential harms” arising from genAI
technologies.
30 Their research underscores the importance of implementing robust
policies that ensure responsible development and deployment, particularly in mitigating
risks of disinformation and potential model hallucinations.
Privacy and security concerns take on particular significance when dealing with
cultural heritage and community narratives. APIA communities have endured histories
of displacement, marginalization, and cultural suppression, making the preservation and
protection of ancestral stories an essential priority. The inherent capability of genAI
models to memorize training data presents significant challenges regarding the
protection of sensitive cultural information and personal histories. To address these
concerns, robust privacy-preserving techniques must be implemented to safeguard both
individual identities and collective cultural memory, ensuring that technological
advancement supports rather than compromises cultural preservation efforts.
The potential for linguistic preservation is especially promising. For APIA
communities facing the potential extinction of Indigenous languages and regional
dialects, genAI could play a transformative role in documentation, translation, and
revitalization through interactive learning tools and preservation archives that bridge
generational knowledge gaps. Importantly, the development of such technologies must
be led by APIA researchers and technologists who inherently understand the nuanced
cultural contexts in order to ensure that AI becomes a tool of empowerment rather than
another mechanism of cultural erasure or misrepresentation.
30 Hamed, Zachara-Szymanska, and Wu, “Safeguarding Authenticity for Mitigating the Harms of
Generative AI: Issues, Research Agenda, and Policies for Detection, Fact-Checking, and Ethical AI.”

14
Critical concerns include the need for thoughtful and ethical implementation, the
importance of diverse representation in development teams, and the necessity of
community-centered approaches that prioritize the perspectives of APIA and other
frontline communities. These challenges are compounded by the resource requirements
for developing large language models, which can perpetuate existing inequities. Despite
these obstacles, when properly implemented with ongoing community input and
validation, genAI holds promise as a valuable tool for heritage conservation and
landscape architecture and ensuring the creation of counter-memories to challenge
hegemonic narratives.
GENAI AT THE INTERSECTION
The theoretical framework for this thesis is grounded in the intersection of three
key concepts: counter-memory, cultural landscapes, and genAI. Specifically, the thesis
examines potential applications of genAI in generating counter-memories of APIA
heritage, while addressing the inherent complexities related to heritage conservation and
landscape architecture—fields that have historically reflected and perpetuated societal
biases in their approaches to preservation, interpretation, and design. Considering that
these fields have traditionally privileged certain narratives while marginalizing others,
the integration of genAI must be approached with careful consideration to avoid
amplifying these existing systemic inequities. Central to this inquiry is the prioritization
of APIA perspectives, ensuring their integral role in shaping both the research process
and the outcomes.
Counter-memory, a concept popularized by philosopher Michel Foucault and
expanded by scholars like George Lipsitz, provides the foundation for understanding
how marginalized communities resist erasure from historic narratives and mainstream
discourse. In the context of APIA communities in Los Angeles, counter-memory serves
as a powerful tool for narrative reclamation, amplifying stories that have been
overlooked or suppressed by dominant historic accounts. This concept facilitates the

15
resurrection of forgotten narratives, challenges prevailing stereotypes, and asserts the
significant APIA presence in—and contributions to—the city’s past and present.
Counter-memories manifest physically and socially through cultural landscapes—
defined as the interweaving of human activity and natural systems that reveals the
sustained interaction between communities and their environment.31 While built
environments focus primarily on physical structures—and ethnic enclaves,
neighborhoods, and districts denote organizational boundaries—cultural landscapes offer
a more comprehensive framework that captures the dynamic interplay between people,
place, and the environment. Hence, cultural landscapes offer a lens through which to
examine how counter-memories are embedded in space, extending beyond physical sites
to include the complex interplay of cultural practices, social relations and interactions,
and collective experiences that shape APIA communities. By focusing on cultural
landscapes, researchers and practitioners can trace how APIA communities have woven
their presence into the urban fabric of Los Angeles while maintaining, strengthening,
and adapting their identities over time.
When applied to cultural landscapes, genAI excels at revealing the layered
complexities of APIA spaces—from physical structures and socio-spatial patterns to
intangible elements like the perception of landscape aesthetics and social interactions.32
Unlike conventional software that requires separate platforms for different tasks, genAI
can simultaneously process historic data, interpret cultural patterns, and generate
responsive design solutions. For instance, while traditional design software requires
skilled input to create effective visualizations, genAI can analyze historic photographs,
oral histories, and community input to effortlessly generate design alternatives that
more accurately reflect APIA heritage and communities. This integration of cultural
31 UNESCO, “Cultural Landscapes” (UNESCO, 2009), https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/.
32 Johannes Langemeyer, Fulvia Calcagni, and Francesc Baró, “Mapping the Intangible: Using Geolocated
Social Media Data to Examine Landscape Aesthetics,” Land Use Policy 77 (September 2018): 542–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049.

16
knowledge with design generation markedly accelerates the ideation phase—tasks that
traditionally require extensive time using hand-drawings, computer-assisted design
(CAD), Photoshop, Enscape, and other raster, vector, and three-dimensional (3D)
graphics software. Beyond mere efficiency, this technological advancement enables
designers to redirect resources toward meaningful community engagement, cultural
education initiatives, and the continuous improvement of AI foundation models through
enhanced cultural datasets that capture both tangible and intangible aspects of APIA
cultural landscapes.
This framework is enriched by incorporating elements of Asian Futurism, a
subset of the broader CoFuturisms movement that encompasses “various forms of
futurisms created by people of color and Global South Futurisms.”33 Asian Futurism,
inspired by Afrofuturism, seeks to envision futures where APIA identities, cultures, and
experiences are centered and empowered. It provides a critical lens through which to
examine how AI-generated representations of APIA heritage can challenge stereotypical
or Orientalist depictions of APIA futures.34 Asian Futurism encourages consideration of
how genAI can be used not just to preserve the past, but to actively shape narratives
about APIA communities in future-oriented ways.35 This approach might involve
employing genAI to create speculative fiction or other artworks based on reclaimed
heritage, reimagine alternative development scenarios, or produce interactive
experiences that blend historic APIA presence with futuristic visions. By integrating
Asian futurist perspectives with genAI technology, this study proposes a unique
approach to APIA heritage conservation that is both rooted in historic realities and
oriented toward imaginative futures.
33 Taryne Jade Taylor et al., The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms, 1st ed. (Taylor & Francis, 2023).
34 Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art, “Asian Futurisms and Speculative Fictions - National
Museum of Asian Art” (Smithsonian, April 2023), https://asia.si.edu/whats-on/blog/posts/asian-futurismsand-speculative-fictions/.
35 Mira Yu, “AI: ‘Asian Intelligence’” (Harvard Political Review, January 2024),
https://harvardpolitics.com/ai-asian-intelligence/.

17
The integration of counter-memory, cultural landscapes, and genAI enhanced by
Asian Futurism creates a robust framework for exploring how a specific form of
technology can be leveraged to preserve, amplify, reclaim, and reimagine APIA heritage
in Los Angeles. This approach allows us to address the complexities of APIA
experiences, from historical erasure to contemporary challenges, while offering new
possibilities for representation and empowerment in both digital and physical spaces.
Grounding the application of genAI in these concepts seeks to make it culturally
sensitive, historically informed, and future-oriented. This framework can inform the
development of genAI to help APIA communities preserve their heritage, shape their
narratives, and envision their futures within the cultural landscape of Los Angeles.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Chapter 1 introduces the complex history and contemporary challenges of APIA
communities in Southern California, particularly Los Angeles County, where they
compose over 15.8% of the population. From their initial settlement in the midnineteenth century through waves of immigration shaped by exclusionary policies and
social change, APIA communities have established profound cultural, economic, and
social influence across the region while facing persistent challenges of discrimination
and inequity. The chapter explores their diverse contributions through ethnic enclaves
like Little Tokyo, Chinatown, and Koreatown; cultural institutions and entrepreneurial
ventures; and ongoing activism for representation and preservation. It analyzes how
these communities navigate contradictory narratives of the “model minority” myth
while confronting systemic barriers, rising anti-Asian sentiment, and threats to cultural
spaces from gentrification and displacement. The discussion extends to examining how
emerging technologies, particularly genAI, interface with APIA heritage preservation
efforts, highlighting both opportunities and risks for representing diverse cultural
narratives and counter-memories in the digital age.

18
Chapter 2 examines counter-memory as both a theoretical framework and
practical tool for challenging dominant narratives that have marginalized APIA
experiences and contributions to American society. Drawing on the work of scholars like
George Lipsitz and Michel Foucault, it explores how counter-memory can preserve and
amplify marginalized histories through various means, from community museums and
historic site preservation to digital storytelling and genAI technologies. The chapter
analyzes specific examples like the Japanese American National Museum, Historic
Filipinotown designation, and innovative projects using genAI for cultural preservation,
while also addressing critical concerns about algorithmic bias and the need for ethical
implementation of these technologies. The chapter emphasizes the importance of
community agency in documenting and sharing their own histories, the role of
storytelling in creating counter-narratives, and the potential for emerging technologies
to both enhance and complicate efforts to preserve APIA cultural heritage and challenge
historical erasure.
Chapter 3 explores how genAI can be leveraged within the Asian Futurism
framework to create counter-memories that challenge dominant narratives while
amplifying marginalized APIA voices and experiences. Through critical examination of
techno-Orientalism, Asian Futurism, and intersectional approaches like Afro-Asian
connections, it investigates how genAI can assist in preserving and reimagining APIA
cultural heritage while avoiding technological determinism and reductive cultural
stereotypes. The chapter emphasizes the importance of data sovereignty and
community-led AI development, drawing lessons from successful initiatives like Te Hiku
Media’s language preservation project to demonstrate how APIA communities can
maintain control over their narratives while leveraging advanced technologies. It argues
that by thoughtfully implementing genAI through Asian Futurist frameworks, APIA
communities can create counter-memories that not only preserve their heritage but also
imagine empowering futures that transcend both Western hegemony and rigid

19
traditionalism, while ensuring technological advancement supports rather than erases
cultural diversity.
The fourth and final chapter delves into the intersection of landscape aesthetics,
cultural landscapes, and genAI technologies. It examines how genAI technology can
serve as a tool for creating visual counter-memories of APIA cultural landscapes in Los
Angeles, while investigating its potential to democratize community involvement in
urban planning processes. Through analysis of landscape aesthetics, cultural landscapes,
and emerging genAI visualization techniques, the chapter explores both the
opportunities and limitations of using AI tools to document, preserve, and reimagine
APIA heritage sites. Drawing on case studies of community projects and research on AIassisted design, it demonstrates how genAI could enhance traditional preservation
methods while empowering community members to participate in creating visual
narratives of their history. However, the chapter also highlights critical concerns about
algorithmic bias, the need for community agency, and the importance of balancing
technological innovation with cultural authenticity and sensitivity. It concludes that
while genAI offers promising potentials for preserving and amplifying APIA countermemories, its most effective use requires thoughtful integration of technological
capabilities with community knowledge and careful consideration of power dynamics in
both urban spaces and digital representation.
Throughout these chapters, the thesis maintains a focus on the ethical implications
of using genAI in cultural heritage contexts and the importance of community-centered
approaches. By examining the intersection of counter-memory, cultural landscape, and
genAI with futurist approaches, this research aspires to contribute to more inclusive and
innovative methodologies for heritage and expression in Los Angeles and beyond.

20
1) CHAPTER 1
APIA IN LOS ANGELES
Asian and Pacific Islander Americans (APIA) have been integral to Southern
California’s multicultural landscape for more than a century and a half. However, these
diverse communities still face considerable challenges in their pursuit of equity and
representation. Systemic inequities persist, exacerbated by misconceptions and
hegemonic narratives that cast them as a monolithic entity of foreigners.
The APIA presence in Los Angeles traces a complex path from the midnineteenth century to the present day, marked by different waves of immigration and
patterns of settlement. Chinese immigration began during the California Gold Rush,
with these immigrants contributing to the mining industry, industrialization of
agriculture, and construction of the transcontinental railroad.36 Chinese Americans first
settled in “Old Chinatown” in the 1850s near El Pueblo de Los Angeles and later pushed
to resettle in the current location. In the late 1890s, recruitment of Japanese immigrants
peaked to fill the labor shortage created by the Chinese Exclusion Act and labor unions
for the Pacific Electric Railway going on strike. Eventually, these settlers established
communities across Los Angeles, including San Fernando Valley, Glendale, Los Feliz,
Venice, West Adams, and more broadly in South Bay. The oldest and most well-known
location is Little Tokyo, which is said to be one of three remaining Nihonmachi
(Japantowns, 日本町) in the U.S.37
Filipino migration increased following the U.S. annexation of the Philippines in
1898. Like the Japanese experience, their settlement patterns were also influenced by the
36 Planning, “Ethnic-Cultural Contexts | Los Angeles City Planning.”
37 Historic Resources Group, Sian Winship, and Christine Lazzaretto, “Los Angeles Citywide Historic
Context Statement: Japanese Americans in Los Angeles, 1869-1970” (Los Angeles City Planning, August
2018), https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/bf97b9b9-cb81-4661-8d20-
62c02b9c1415/SurveyLA_JapaneseAmericanContextandResources_Aug2018.pdf.

21
labor shortage resulting from exclusionary laws and labor movements. Filipino workers
were desired since the Philippines was a U.S. territory and thus these exclusionary
policies did not apply to them. However, the passing of “Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934,
which reclassified Filipinos as aliens and restricted immigration into the U.S. to an
annual quota of fifty persons,” effectively ended the Filipino migration.
38 By the 1940s,
Filipino neighborhoods had sprung up in Bunker Hill (Little Manila), Long Beach, San
Pedro, and Wilmington, but the community struggled for decades in a constant flux due
to displacement and redevelopment pressures until Historic Filipinotown was officially
designated by the City of Los Angeles in 2008.
According to Asian Americans Advancing Justice, approximately one million
Asians entered the U.S. between 1859 and 1924, though the most significant community
growth and diversification occurred after the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act,
which led to substantial Korean, Vietnamese, and South Asian immigration.39
Fig. 1.1: The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Chapter 126, “An Act to Execute Certain Treaty Stipulations
Relating to Chinese.” (U.S. Congress, May 6, 1882, National Archives).
In Los Angeles County, APIA communities have established profound cultural,
economic, and social influence that extends far beyond their distinct ethnic enclaves.
According to the 2020 census, Asian Americans represent over 15.8% of the county’s
38 M. Rosalind Sagara et al., “Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement: Filipino Americans in Los
Angeles, 1903-1980” (Los Angeles City Planning, August 2018), 11,
https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/f338a444-4277-4c0b-b8b0-
35337ee6ef98/SurveyLA_FilipinoAmericanContextandResources_Aug2018_1.pdf.
39 Asian Americans Advancing Justice, “Inside the Numbers: How Immigration Shapes Asian American
and Pacific Islander Communities | Asian Americans Advancing Justice” (AAJC, June 2019),
https://www.advancingjustice-aajc.org/inside-the-numbers-report-2019.

22
population, making them the second-largest ethnic group after Hispanic or Latino
residents.40 This diaspora of over 1.5 million people encompasses individuals of Chinese,
Filipino, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, Indian, Thai, and Native Hawaiian descent,
representing more than twenty-five APIAs represented in the region.41
Their influence can be seen throughout the region’s cultural landscape, from the
pioneering Asian American actress Anna May Wong, who broke barriers across film,
radio, television, production, and fashion—while defying racism, typecasting, and antimiscegenation laws in Hollywood42—to architect Gin Wong, FAIA, who helped “define
the landscape of Los Angeles in structures as diverse as a gas station, CBS Television
City and Los Angeles International Airport.”43 The community’s social impact is
exemplified by leaders like Bill Watanabe, founding father of Little Tokyo Service
Center, who helped preserve cultural heritage while addressing community needs,44 and
Dr. Amarjit Singh Marwah, whose advocacy advanced both Sikh American causes and
broader civic engagement.45
40 U. S. Census Bureau, “QuickFacts: Los Angeles County, California” (United States Census Bureau,
2023), https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/losangelescountycalifornia/RHI425223#RHI425223.
41 Aida Ylanan and Sandhya Kambhampati, “How Los Angeles County Became Home to the Biggest
AAPI Communities in the Country,” Los Angeles Times, May 15, 2024,
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-15/how-southern-california-became-home-to-thebiggest-aapi-communities-in-the-country.
42 Minhae Shim Roth, “Anna May Wong: 13 Facts About Her Trailblazing Hollywood Career,” HISTORY,
Accessed April 30, 2024, https://www.history.com/news/anna-may-wong-facts-career.
43 Richard Sandomir, “Gin Wong, Who Designed Futuristic Buildings in Los Angeles, Dies at 94,” The
New York Times, September 17, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/us/gin-wong-dead-los-angelesarchitect.html.
44 UCLA, “Bill Watanabe ’72 – UCLA Our Stories Our Impact” UCLA: Our Stories, Our Impact, 2024,
https://ourstoriesourimpact.irle.ucla.edu/bill-watanabe/. 45 University of Illinois Chicago, “Los Angeles Names Public Square in Hollywood for Dr. Amarjit Singh
Marwah | College of Dentistry | University of Illinois Chicago” UIC - College of Dentistry, February 3,
2019, https://dentistry.uic.edu/news-stories/los-angeles-names-public-square-in-hollywood-for-dr-amarjitsingh-marwah/.

23
Fig. 1.2: (left) Gin Wong’s iconic modernist gas station in Los Angeles. (Iris Schneider, photograph, Los
Angeles Times).
Fig. 1.3: (right) Portrait of architect Gin D. Wong, FAIA. (USC Digital Libraries).
The APIA cultural presence spans Los Angeles County and beyond. The city’s
current Chinatown, established in 1939 after much of the original site gave way to Union
Station, stands as a vibrant center of commercial and cultural activities, recognized as
the “first modern American Chinatown that was owned and planned by the Chinese of
Los Angeles.”46
Koreatown, “the densest neighborhood west of Manhattan,”47 stands as a
dynamic multiethnic hub in Los Angeles, home to the largest concentration of Koreans
outside of Korea while maintaining a Latino majority and sizable Bangladeshi
presence.48 The neighborhood’s cultural vitality is evident in its commercial landscape,
where diverse businesses coexist, and often operate in multiple languages, though
residents increasingly face challenges from rising housing costs and overcrowding.
46 Di Gao, “Why We’re Protecting America’s Chinatowns” (National Trust for Historic Preservation, May
2023), Accessed July 16, 2024, https://savingplaces.org/stories/why-protecting-americas-chinatowns.
47 Brady Collins et al., “Overcooked & Underserved: The Challenges of Koreatown’s Restaurant Workers”
UCLA Labor Center, October 2023, https://labor.ucla.edu/publications/overcooked-underservedkoreatown-restaurant-workers/. 48 Shelley Sang-Hee Lee, Koreatown, Los Angeles: Immigration, Race, and the “American Dream”, 1st ed.
(Stanford University Press, 2022).

24
Fig. 1.4: Map of APIA Enclaves in Los Angeles. (Base map created using ArcGIS Pro, labels by author).
Map of APIA enclaves in Los Angeles showing the spatial relationships between Koreatown, Chinatown,
Little Tokyo, Thai Town, and Historic Filipinotown near Downtown Los Angeles.
Designated in 2002 after decades of community advocacy and education, Historic
Filipinotown (HiFi) near downtown Los Angeles celebrates the Filipino diaspora
through organizations like the Pilipino Workers Center and Filipino American
Community of Los Angeles. The community preserves its heritage through landmarks
such as the Filipino American WWII Veterans Memorial, annual Parol Lighting along
Temple Street, and numerous Christian churches that serve as community anchors.
The San Gabriel Valley (SGV) represents a newer pattern of settlement that
emerged when Asian immigrants, experiencing rapid industrialization of their home
countries in the 1970s and 1980s, bypassed traditional urban enclaves to settle directly in
middle-class suburbs.49 Monterey Park became known as the “suburban Chinatown,”
49 R. Varisa Patraporn and Barbara W Kim, “Resurgent Ethnicity and Residential Choice Among SecondGeneration Asian Americans in a Los Angeles Panethnic Suburb,” Urban Affairs Review 58 (June 2021):
861–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211016941.

25
attracting residents through a combination of economic factors, familiarity,
convenience, and identity formation, including its relatively affordable properties and
proximity to Los Angeles’ historic Chinatown.50 Over time, SGV evolved to house
significant and diverse Asian immigrant populations, with Vietnamese immigrants
outpacing the growth of ethnic Chinese populations from Taiwan and Hong Kong.
However, despite the apparent success, these communities still face significant
stratification challenges, including housing discrimination, barriers to residential
mobility, and limited access to amenities. The region also illustrates how contemporary
immigration patterns and socioeconomic diversity have complicated traditional models
of residential assimilation and segregation, particularly in global economic centers like
Los Angeles, where ethnic enclaves continue to form and evolve despite increased
suburban integration.51
Fig. 1.5: AAPI Population Growth in San Gabriel Valley. (Map/infographic published in Aida Ylanan and
Sandhya Kambhampati, "How Los Angeles County Became Home to the Biggest AAPI Communities in
the Country," Los Angeles Times, May 15, 2024, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-15/howsouthern-california-became-home-to-the-biggest-aapi-communities-in-the-country).
50 Michael Liu and Kim Geron, “Changing Neighborhood: Ethnic Enclaves and the Struggle for Social
Justice,” Social Justice 35, no. 2(122) (2008): 22, https://www.jstor.org/stable/29768486. 51 Patraporn and Kim, “Resurgent Ethnicity and Residential Choice Among Second-Generation Asian
Americans in a Los Angeles Panethnic Suburb.”

26
The APIA presence demonstrates remarkable enterprising spirit and cultural
dynamism through distinct business corridors across Los Angeles County. Their
economic impact manifests through diverse enterprises—from family-owned businesses
like Fugetsu-Do (est. 1903) in Little Tokyo specializing in traditional Japanese sweets,
Otomisan (est. 1954), the last remnant of Japanese American presence in Boyle Heights,
and Sapp Coffee Shop (est. 1970s), one of the “Original Thai Joint[s]” in Hollywood
alongside Jitlada that attracted “alternative culture and the LGBTQ community.”52 This
entrepreneurial legacy extends to larger chains like the Panda Restaurant Group (est.
1973) and 99 Ranch Market (est. 1984), which helped establish Los Angeles as a panAsian shopping and dining destination.
The community has also made significant contributions in technology,
entertainment, and professional services. While East West Bank grew from a local
savings and loan in Chinatown to become one of California’s largest independent banks,
newer initiatives like Small Biz Hype Squad are helping small businesses bridge the
digital divide.53 In entertainment and media, companies like 88rising, Wong Fu
Productions, and Fung Brothers have fostered APIA representation in popular culture,
creating a global platform for APIA artists, performers, and content creators.
Beyond more established enclaves, emerging communities such as Little
Bangladesh and Afghan neighborhoods in the Valley serve as vital hubs for cultural
preservation and exchange. In Little Bangladesh, established along 3rd Street between
New Hampshire and Alexandria, the community has developed an ambitious master
plan to transform the area into a cultural corridor through public art, infrastructure
improvements, and cultural landmarks, including plans for a Martyrs’ Monument
52 “Sapp Coffee Shop,” Sapp Coffee Shop, Accessed August 9, 2024, https://www.sappcoffeeshop.com.
53 Los Angeles Conservancy, “Small Biz Hype Squad/Little Tokyo Service Center - LA Conservancy” LA
Conservancy, July 26, 2024, https://www.laconservancy.org/learn/historic-places/small-biz-hype-squadlittle-tokyo-service-center/.

27
commemorating those who sacrificed for the Bengali language movement.54 The district
aims to display Bangladesh’s heritage through murals, cultural displays, and
architectural elements while improving the neighborhood’s functionality for residents
and visitors alike.
Native Hawaiian, Samoan, Chamorro, and other Pacific Islander communities
contribute distinct cultural traditions and community practices through initiatives led by
organizations like Empowering Pacific Islander Communities (EPIC). Founded in 2009,
EPIC exemplifies how these communities preserve their cultural heritage while
addressing contemporary challenges through leadership development and advocacy,
guided by cultural values like Kuleana (responsibility) and Tauhi vā (reciprocity).55
In the arts, APIA artists continue to expand their influence across media and
artistic landscapes, supported by institutions such as the Art Salon in Chinatown, Pacific
Island Ethnic Art Museum, Epoch (virtual) Gallery, and Visual Communications Media
Arts. These entities have become fundamental to Los Angeles’ identity, complemented
by robust cultural contributions.56
These communities facilitate intergenerational knowledge transmission through
cultural programming, advocacy work, and community gatherings, while fostering
intercultural dialogue that strengthens Los Angeles’ social fabric. Each enclave and
organization contributes unique traditions and practices that enrich the broader cultural
landscape, demonstrating how ethnic communities can both preserve their distinct
heritage and engage in meaningful cross-cultural exchange.
54 Little Bangladesh Improvements Inc., “Master Plan – Little Bangladesh” Littlebangladesh.org, 2024,
http://littlebangladesh.org/master-plan/. 55 Empowering Pacific Islander Communities, “EPIC: About Us,” EPIC, 2024,
https://www.empoweredpi.org/about-us. 56 AAPI LA, “The AAPI Mission by AAPI LA Podcast,” AAPI LA, Accessed May 21, 2024,
https://aapila.org/the-mission/.

28
However, mounting challenges threaten these cultural spaces as community
members continue to endure challenges from exclusion, gentrification, displacement,
and racist rhetoric—pressures that were intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic as they
continue to struggle in their effort to retain their sense of community.57 APIA enclaves
across Los Angeles as they work to sustain their roles and relevancy as economic, social,
and cultural hubs. Little Tokyo remains a vital cultural center for Japanese Americans,
though its 2024 designation by the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s 11 Most
Endangered Historic Places signals growing preservation challenges.58
Development and gentrification pressures endanger historic enclaves, while
systemic barriers, such as underrepresentation in positions of power, immigration status,
and the legacy of laws preventing accumulation of generational wealth, perpetuate
inequities in economic and social advancement. The COVID-19 pandemic brought
underlying tensions to the forefront, with a sharp rise in anti-Asian hate crimes and
discrimination. Between January 2020 and June 2021, over 9,000 incidents of hate and
discrimination against APIA individuals were documented nationally, with Los Angeles
County accounting for approximately 9% of reported cases.59 These incidents, ranging
from verbal harassment to physical assaults, underscored the persistent perception of
APIA individuals as foreigners. President Donald Trump’s public references to the
coronavirus as the “China Virus,” “Chinese Virus,” and “Kung Flu” exacerbated these
tensions, with his administration’s rhetoric normalizing prejudice and deepening societal
57 UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, “Maps Show Gentrification, Displacement Policies” UCLA
Luskin, July 2018, https://luskin.ucla.edu/maps-by-cnk-researchers-visualized-displacement-policiesgentrification.
58 National Trust for Historic Preservation, “America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places for 2024 |
National Trust for Historic Preservation” savingplaces.org, May 9, 2024, https://savingplaces.org/stories/11-
most-endangered-historic-places-2024.
59 Raw data in .csv format can be found here: https://stopaapihate.org/explore-our-data/.

29
divisions.60 These challenges highlight the need for novel approaches to cultural
preservation that can protect and amplify APIA voices and experiences.
In response, communities are leveraging cultural heritage through multiple
strategies: establishing historic designations like Little Tokyo’s National Register of
Historic Places status to protect buildings and businesses from displacement; creating
cultural institutions like the Chinese American Museum and Japanese American
National Museum that document community histories and educate the broader public;
and developing intergenerational programs through organizations like Visual
Communications and EPIC that nurture new cultural leaders while preserving
traditional arts and stories. These efforts demonstrate how cultural heritage can serve
both as a shield against erasure and as a bridge for greater understanding and advocacy
for APIA voices and experiences.
APIA NARRATIVES
Early APIA settlers faced severe systemic racism through exclusionary legislation
and discrimination. The Chinese massacre of 1871 resulted in the killing of ten percent of
the Chinese population of the city.61 The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the National
Origins Act of 1924, the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934, and the Filipino Repatriation Act
of 1935 created significant barriers to immigration and citizenship. The forced removal
and incarceration of approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II
(1941–1946) stands as a stark example of how racism and xenophobia shaped early APIA
experiences, with impacts that continue to influence contemporary communities. The
1992 Los Angeles riots impacted over 2,200 Korean-owned businesses, causing an
60 David Nakamura, “With ‘Kung Flu,’ Trump Sparks Backlash over Racist Language — and a Rallying
Cry for Supporters,” Washington Post, June 24, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-kungflu-trump-sparks-backlash-over-racist-language--and-a-rallying-cry-for-supporters/2020/06/24/485d151eb620-11ea-aca5-ebb63d27e1ff_story.html. 61 Kelly Wallace, “Forgotten Los Angeles History: The Chinese Massacre of 1871,” Los Angeles Public
Library, May 19, 2017, https://www.lapl.org/collections-resources/blogs/lapl/chinese-massacre-1871.

30
estimated $400 million in damages.”62 The trauma of these historic injustices,
particularly the internment experience, has been passed down through generations,
affecting family dynamics, economic opportunities, and cultural identity within APIA
communities today.63
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a pivotal turning point in
APIA demographics. The reopening of U.S. borders catalyzed increased immigration
and unprecedented population diversification. This legislative reform fundamentally
reshaped the APIA presence in Los Angeles, leading to the formation of new ethnic
enclaves, cultural institutions, and community organizations that continue to serve
diverse APIA populations today.
APIA communities occupy a complex, and often contradictory, position in the
U.S. racial hierarchy, as analyzed in Claire Jean Kim’s influential 1999 work, “The Racial
Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Two conflicting narratives dominate public
discourse: APIAs are simultaneously portrayed as a successful “model minority”
celebrated for their economic achievements and sociocultural contributions, while also
facing civic ostracism and are excluded from full integration into American society,
perpetually viewed as foreigners regardless of their citizenship status or generational
roots in the United States.64
62 Agnes Constante, “25 Years after LA Riots, Koreatown Finds Strength in ‘Saigu’ Legacy,” NBC News,
April 25, 2017, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/25-years-after-la-riots-koreatown-findsstrength-saigu-legacy-n749081.
63 Daniel Shoag and Nicholas Carollo, “The Causal Effect of Place: Evidence from Japanese-American
Internment,” SSRN Electronic Journal, May 2016, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798253. 64 Claire Jean Kim, “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans,” Politics & Society 27 (March 1999):
105–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001005.

31
Fig. 1.6: The Magic Washer, Manufactured by Geo. Dee, Dixon, Illinois. (Shober & Carqueville Lithograph
Company, 1886, color lithograph, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/resource/pga.02758/). The
Chinese Must Go, showing Uncle Sam forcibly expelling Chinese immigrants.
This contradiction manifests in tangible ways. Despite high rates of educational
attainment and professional success across various sectors, APIAs face significant
barriers to full civic and social participation. These include severe underrepresentation
in elected offices at local, state, and federal levels, as well as documented obstacles to
career advancement.65 A 2022 study by Ascend found that APIA professionals, though
often constituting the largest minority group hired in corporate sectors, are least likely
65 Di Shao, “Is There a Bamboo Ceiling? The Asian-White Gap in Managerial Attainment for CollegeEducated Workers,” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 9 (July 2022): 233264922211148,
https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492221114809.

32
to be promoted to management and executive positions.66 This phenomenon, known as
the “minority glass ceiling” or “bamboo ceiling,” varies significantly across APIA
subgroups, with Di Shao’s research showing that factors such as national origin,
education level, and immigration status strongly influence career trajectories and
advancement opportunities.67
Fig. 1.7: Diagram showing racial triangulation theory. (Adapted from Claire Jean Kim, “The Racial
Triangulation of Asian Americans,” Politics & Society 27, no. 1 (1999): 105-38). Diagram illustrating Claire
Jean Kim’s racial triangulation theory showing the positioning of Asian Americans in relation to Black
and white Americans along axes of superior/inferior and insider/foreigner.
These often unchecked racist and divisive rhetorics inflicted profound and lasting
damage on APIA communities already marginalized by systemic inequalities.
66 Ascend: Pan-Asian Leaders, “Barely a Crack in the Asian Glass Ceiling,” Ascend, May 15, 2022,
https://www.ascendleadership.org/thought-leadership/barely-a-crack-in-the-asian-glass-ceiling.
67 Claire Jean Kim, “Playing the Racial Trump Card: Asian Americans In Contemporary U.S. Politics,”
Amerasia Journal 26 (February 1999): 35–65, https://doi.org/10.17953/amer.26.3.qm86n1j56w025m75.

33
Misrepresenting China’s role in the spread of COVID-19, dramatizing national security
threats, and exaggerating the negative impact on the American economy served to
normalize prejudice, embolden extremists, and deepen societal divisions while
exacerbating existing hostility toward APIAs, person(s) perceived to be APIA, or
person(s) targeted for supporting or associating with APIAs.68
Fig. 1.8: Thai American community members, political leaders, and law enforcement officials rally against
anti-Asian hate crimes in Thai Town, Los Angeles, April 8, 2021. (Genaro Molina, Los Angeles Times, in
Anh Do, “Report Shows Breadth of Anti-Asian Racism with Attacks from Alhambra to Michigan, in
Schools, Restaurants,” May 7, 2021, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-07/anti-asian-racismexplosion).
To address these challenges and reclaim their narratives, APIA communities in
Los Angeles have engaged in various initiatives to memorialize their histories and
contributions. Institutions such as the Chinese American Museum, housed in the last
surviving building of the original Chinatown,69 and the Japanese American National
68 Stop AAPI Hate, “The Blame Game: How Political Rhetoric Inflames Anti-Asian Scapegoating,” Stop
AAPI Hate, October 12, 2022, https://stopaapihate.org/2022/10/12/anti-asian-scapegoating/.
69 1890 Garnier Building in El Pueblo de Los Angeles

34
Museum serve as generators and repositories of counter-memory, collecting and
preserving stories that might otherwise be lost to dominant historical narratives.
Contemporary advocacy efforts are led by organizations like the AAPI Equity
Alliance, which emerged from a long history of Asian American coalition-building
dating back to the 1960s. Founded in the aftermath of the Watts Riots, the organization
has evolved to focus on improving APIA lives through civic engagement, capacity
building, and policy advocacy. More recent initiatives include the Asian American Voter
Empowerment Project (AAVEP), launched by a coalition of organizations including the
Pilipino Workers Center of Southern California and AAPIs for Equity. AAVEP
specifically addresses the voter participation gap in APIA communities by conducting
targeted voter registration and education programs across Los Angeles, where many
Asian Americans report receiving no contact about elections despite representing a
significant portion of the electorate.
70
These organizational efforts extend beyond preserving history by actively
shaping civic engagement and political representation in Los Angeles. Moreover, they
help formulate contemporary understandings of APIA contributions while influencing
the future direction of social and political discourse in the city.
APIA CHALLENGES
APIA ethnic enclaves in the United States, particularly Chinatowns and other
APIA neighborhoods, face significant threats from gentrification and urban
redevelopment, leading to the displacement of long-time residents and businesses.
Initially formed due to legal segregation and discriminatory laws, many of these ethnic
enclaves have existed for over 150 years. Today, they serve as important cultural spaces
while providing places for new immigrants to establish themselves in American society.71
70 More information about their work can be found here: https://www.asianamvote.org/
71 Yi-Fu Tuan, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, 8th ed. (University of Minnesota Press, 2001).

35
The urgency of preservation is underscored by the National Trust for Historic
Preservation’s listing of Seattle’s and Philadelphia’s Chinatowns (2023) and Los Angeles’
Little Tokyo (2024) among America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places.

Fig. 1.9: (left) Screenshot of Little Tokyo’s listing among America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places for
2024. (National Trust for Historic Preservation, “America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places for 2024,”
savingplaces.org, May 1, 2024, https://savingplaces.org/stories/11-most-endangered-historic-places-2024).
Fig. 1.10: (right) Screenshot of Seattle’s International District/Chinatown’s listing among America’s 11 Most
Endangered Historic Places for 2023. (National Trust for Historic Preservation, “America’s 11 Most
Endangered Historic Places for 2023,” savingplaces.org, May 9, 2023, https://savingplaces.org/stories/11-
most-endangered-historic-places-2023).
Little Tokyo in Los Angeles and Chinatowns in Washington, D.C., New York,
Boston, and Philadelphia are experiencing rising rents, luxury developments, and
demographic shifts that are transforming these communities. Simultaneously, new types
of Asian enclaves are emerging in American suburbs, driven by more recent waves of
immigration. These newer communities, exemplified by places like Irvine, Arcadia, and
Monterey Park, California, feature clusters of businesses, markets, and restaurants
catering to both the local Asian population and a broader audience interested in
“authentic” cultural experiences.

36
The preservation of historic APIA neighborhoods is crucial, as they provide
affordable housing, language-specific services, and a sense of community for many lowincome immigrants.72 However, poorly executed redevelopment efforts have led to the
loss of these enclaves, affecting not only current residents but also impacting the
broader APIA community by erasing important cultural and historic landmarks.
The chapter “Urban Landscape History: The Sense of Place and the Politics of
Space” by Dolores Hayden in Understanding Ordinary Landscapes further illustrates the
critical role of historic understanding in landscape architecture. It reveals how power
dynamics have profoundly shaped urban development, with gatekeepers controlling
access to space through displacement, exclusion, and neglect based on various social
factors.73 Hayden’s observation that limiting access to space has been used to constrain
the economic and political rights of certain groups underscores the profound social
implications of landscape design and urban planning.74
Gentrification, along with displacement, exemplifies how changes in the
landscape can create ideological and psychological divides, leading to inequality and loss
of cultural heritage. This process affects not only the immediate neighborhood but also
transforms the social dynamics of the city and county, emphasizing the interconnected
nature of urban spaces and communities. The imbalance created by new visions of
placemaking ripples across the region, resulting in significant losses through
gentrification: displacement of individuals and families, erosion of cultures and
traditions, erasure of memories and lived experiences, loss of tacit knowledge, and
alteration of the energy and pace that defined these neighborhoods.
72 Liu and Geron, “Changing Neighborhood: Ethnic Enclaves and the Struggle for Social Justice.”
73 Dolores Hayden, “Urban Landscape History: The Sense of Place and the Politics of Space,”
Understanding Ordinary Landscapes (Yale University Press, 1997), 111–33,
https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300185614-010.
74 Hayden, “Urban Landscape History: The Sense of Place and the Politics of Space,” 117.

37
These perspectives raise an important question for the field of landscape
architecture: How can it provide a more equitable narrative and reshape our
understanding of history’s influence on the built environment, particularly in relation to
the identities of people, places, and cultures? At the core of this inquiry lie the
interrelated concepts of landscape aesthetics and cultural landscapes, which are
fundamental to comprehending human interactions with and interpretations of their
environments.
Applying Foucault’s and Lipsitz’s concepts of counter-memory to APIA history is
crucial for understanding patterns of cultural erasure and resistance. Berthold Molden,
in “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective
Memory” (2015), references Foucault’s observation that “blocks of historical knowledge”
are concealed not only through direct suppression but through “silent consent within
hegemonic relations of mnemonic power.”75 This subtle form of erasure particularly
affects APIA communities, where cultural memories and histories often fade through
institutional neglect rather than overt censorship. Lipsitz’s approach to counter-memory
offers a potent framework for resistance, as it “starts with the particular and the specific
and then builds outward toward a total story.”76 This method proves especially valuable
for APIA histories, which encompass diverse ethnic groups, multiple waves of
migration, and varied geographical locations, all requiring careful attention to local
experiences and specific community narratives.
As Viet Thanh Nguyen notes in Race and Resistance, these theoretical approaches
help challenge the “model minority” myth by revealing the full spectrum of APIA
experiences, including histories of resistance and struggle.77 Ultimately, this approach
75 Berthold Molden, “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective
Memory,” Memory Studies 9 (July 2015): 125–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015596014.
76 George Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture (University of
Minnesota Press, 2001), 213.
77 Viet Thanh Nguyen, Race and Resistance: Literature & Politics in Asian America (Oxford University
Press, 2006), https://doi-org.libproxy1.usc.edu/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195146998.001.0001.

38
enriches our understanding of APIA history while contributing to a more nuanced and
inclusive narrative of American history as a whole.
APIA IDENTITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE
The challenges facing APIA communities in Los Angeles reflect complex
histories spanning over 150 years, histories that risk being further marginalized or
misrepresented by emerging technologies. As Nguyen argues, the growing complexity
of “Asian America” complicates ideological cohesion, particularly under “a pluralist
system of government that is committed to propagating capitalism, which in its turn
transforms Asian American identity into both a lifestyle commodity and a market for
that commodity.”78 This commodification of identity poses particular challenges for
developing genAI tools that can appropriately represent APIA experiences and countermemories. The misconception of a “post-multicultural society” not only risks
diminishing racial identity’s political urgency in favor of economic interests but also
threatens to normalize biased technological systems. As Nguyen further explains, “this
transformation of race into a cultural icon and commodity in the marketplace of
multiculturalism is embodied in the model minority...[which] is the vehicle of entry for a
racial population not only into American capitalism but also into American politics—
indeed, the two go hand in hand.”79
For APIA communities in Los Angeles grappling with both physical and digital
conservation of their heritage, Jaron Lanier’s perspective in “How to Picture AI” (2024)
on demystifying AI technology becomes particularly relevant. Instead of viewing genAI
as either a magical solution or an existential threat to heritage conservation and cultural
landscape, Lanier advocates for understanding genAI models as comprehensible tools
78 Nguyen, Race and Resistance: Literature & Politics in Asian America.
79 Nguyen, Race and Resistance: Literature & Politics in Asian America.

39
with defined strengths and weaknesses.80 He criticizes the intentionally vague and
ambiguous language used by tech companies, arguing that it contributes to a sense of
human obsolescence and befuddlement about AI’s true nature and capabilities.81 This
clarity is vital for APIA communities working to document and preserve their
narratives, as it enables both strategic and intentional use of these technology tools
while remaining cognizant of their constraints.
The limitations of genAI in preserving APIA heritage become particularly
apparent when examining how these tools handle counter-memories and marginalized
narratives. As Lanier notes, while genAI can interpolate between existing knowledge, it
cannot extrapolate beyond the “tree line” of its training data—meaning it can only work
within the bounds of what they have been trained on.82 Noting this limitation is crucial
for APIA communities, whose histories often exist outside mainstream documentation.
The AI NOW Institute emphasizes this constraint, noting that “within the spaces where
AI is being created, and in the logic of how AI systems are designed, the costs of bias,
harassment, and discrimination are borne by the same people: gender minorities, people
of color, and other under-represented groups.”83
These concerns about bias and representation manifest concretely in Los
Angeles’ APIA neighborhoods. Machine learning (ML) models trained on mainstream
data often struggle to accurately represent the nuanced cultural experiences and
counter-memories preserved in places like Little Bangladesh or Historic Filipinotown.
Bias can persist despite extensive training with human input and feedback. A 2024 study
by Lexin Zhou, Wout Schellaert, Fernando Martínez-Plumed, Yael Moros-Daval, Cèsar
80 Jaron Lanier, “How to Picture A.I.,” The New Yorker, March 2024,
https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intelligence/how-to-picture-ai. 81 Lanier, “How to Picture A.I.”
82 Lanier, “How to Picture A.I.”
83 Sarah Myers West, Meredith Whittaker, and Kate Crawford, "Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race,
and Power in AI," AI NOW (AI Now Institute, April 2019), https://ainowinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/04/discriminatingsystems.pdf.

40
Ferri, and José Hernández-Orallo, “Larger and More Instructable Language Models
Become Less Reliable,” suggests that as genAI models become more powerful through
increased size, data, and computing power, they paradoxically become less reliable from
a user perspective.
84 Drawing on this research, this effect particularly impacts APIA
communities through a dangerous combination of factors: as these models grow more
powerful, they increasingly provide plausible but incorrect information while becoming
less likely to acknowledge their limitations—a phenomenon coined by the authors as
“ultracrepidarianism.”85
For APIA communities whose histories and experiences often exist outside
mainstream documentation, this creates a compound risk where the models not only fail
to accurately represent cultural narratives but do so with misleading confidence. This is
especially concerning given that human oversight becomes less effective at catching
these sophisticated errors, creating a situation where both the model and human
verification can fail simultaneously. These reliability issues disproportionately affect
communities with limited access to technical expertise and verification resources, who
may need to rely more heavily on these systems while having fewer safeguards against
their increasingly subtle forms of misinformation86
Such drawbacks stem from inherent flaws in source materials, which often suffer
from discrepancies including incomplete, skewed, or non-representative datasets.
Human factors further compound the issue by embedding biases, stereotypes, and
cultural assumptions into these datasets. As demonstrated by numerous cases of
algorithmic discrimination,
87 technologists acknowledge the presence of race, gender,
84 Lexin Zhou et al., “Larger and More Instructable Language Models Become Less Reliable,” Nature 634
(September 2024): 61–68, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07930-y. 85 Zhou et al., “Larger and More Instructable Language Models Become Less Reliable.”
86 Zhou et al., “Larger and More Instructable Language Models Become Less Reliable.”
87 Glenn Gow, “Revealing The Dark Side: The Top 6 Problems With ChatGPT And Generative AI In
2024” (Forbes, January 28, 2024), https://www.forbes.com/sites/glenngow/2024/01/28/revealing-the-dark-sidethe-top-6-problems-with-chatgpt-and-generative-ai-in-2024/.

41
and class biases within genAI models, but they often minimize the practical implications
of these limitations. This approach effectively normalizes concerning ideological biases
in pursuit of technological advancement, allowing discriminatory algorithms and
systems to perpetuate despite known limitations.
88
To address these systemic issues, particularly as they affect APIA communities,
institutions must implement comprehensive safeguards that prioritize cultural
authenticity and representation. This includes developing rigorous bias testing protocols
specifically attuned to APIA perspectives, ensuring substantial APIA representation in
AI development teams, establishing independent algorithmic audits with cultural
competency requirements, and creating accountability frameworks that specifically
address cultural preservation and accuracy. While organizations must prioritize these
protections over rapid deployment, policymakers should simultaneously develop and
enforce regulations that protect marginalized communities from algorithmic
discrimination. Without these systematic changes, the continued emphasis on
technological convenience over demonstrated harmful impacts threatens to further
marginalize APIA narratives and experiences while reinforcing existing societal
inequities.
Digital crowdsourcing platforms have emerged as proven methods for preserving
counter-memories, as exemplified by initiatives like the South Asian American Digital
Archive (SAADA) and East at Main Street. SAADA has spent 16 years documenting
South Asian American stories, building an archive of over 5,600 items that has reached
more than 1.1 million visitors worldwide.89 The East at Main Street is a collaborative
mapping project that uses Historypin’s web platform to document APIA historic sites
88 Karimi, “People of Color Have a New Enemy: Techno-Racism.”
89 “South Asian American Digital Archive (SAADA),” South Asian American Digital Archive (SAADA),
2024, https://www.saada.org/.

42
across the U.S., engaging communities in mapping and preserving locations significant
to APIA history through photographs, videos, and personal narratives.90
Fig. 1.11: Screenshot of Historypin database results showing historical documentation of Little India in
Artesia, California. (Historypin.org, Accessed December 8, 2024).
These digital archives demonstrate how technology can collect, preserve, and
share marginalized histories. While not specific to Los Angeles, these models could be
adapted to focus on the diverse APIA communities in the city, providing accessible
platforms for documenting and exploring counter-memories. In this context, genAI
could power interactive storytelling experiences that allow users to explore alternative
histories of Los Angeles, making choices that reveal various aspects of the APIA
experience. Potential implementations of genAI include generating “spin-off” stories of
specific sites to provide broader context for existing narratives, creating alternate
historic scenarios, exploring linguistic challenges through multilanguage passages,
powering interactive choose-your-own-adventure-style narratives, and creating
imaginary cross-cultural dialogues between characters from different stories.
90 Shift Collective, “East at Main Street,” APIAHiP, 2014, https://www.historypin.org/en/east-at-mainstreet.

43
Fig. 1.12: Screenshot of AI-generated role-playing game. (Created using Perchance, Accessed October 23,
2024, https://perchance.org/welcome). AI-generated role-playing game scenario adapting historical records
of Terminal Island residents from Japanese American National Museum archives. Full transcript available
in Appendix 5.
SPACES OF MEMORY AND RESISTANCE
The intersection of APIA communities, urban landscapes, and digital
technologies thus creates both opportunities and challenges for preserving countermemories and cultural heritage in Los Angeles. This convergence reveals how power
dynamics manifest across physical, social, and digital spaces, shaping both individual
and collective identities in ways that can either amplify or suppress marginalized voices.
If we consider memory to be rooted in place, as shown in traditional African and Asian
cosmology where events and memories are intrinsically tied to specific physical
locations,
91 then any meaningful analysis of genAI’s potential for establishing countermemory must critically examine its ability to authentically represent these landscapes—a
challenge that echoes broader questions about preservation and authenticity in cultural
memory.
92
The future of APIA narratives requires approaches that recognize these
interconnected challenges while acknowledging the significant limitations of the current
91 Walter Hood, “Introduction,” Walter Hood and Grace Mitchell Tada, Black Landscapes Matter
(University of Virginia Press, 2020), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cw9rx.
92 Maurizio Peleggi, “The Unbearable Impermanence of Things: Reflections on Buddhism, Cultural
Memory and Heritage Conservation,” Routledge Handbook of Heritage in Asia (Routledge, 2011), 55–68,
https://doi-org.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.4324/9780203156001.

44
AI and genAI models. By applying Foucault’s and Lipsitz’s frameworks of countermemory, while maintaining a clear understanding of genAI’s capabilities and
limitations, preservation efforts must ensure that digital tools capture the full spectrum
of APIA experiences rather than reinforcing dominant narratives. This work extends
beyond preserving history to actively shaping contemporary civic engagement and
political representation in Los Angeles, where both cultural institutions and advocacy
organizations continue redefining their narratives and expanding their political
influence in the city.
The physical spaces where these activities take place—from museums to cultural
centers to historic neighborhoods—serve as important sites of counter-memories. These
locations embody decades of struggle and resistance while providing a foundation for
ongoing community empowerment and identity formation. Understanding how these
landscapes function requires a theoretical framework that can account for their complex
role in shaping identity and power dynamics, particularly as communities navigate both
physical preservation and digital documentation.
By framing landscape as a verb rather than a noun, J.W.T. Mitchell’s Landscape
and Power can provide a valuable framework for analyzing how landscapes actively
shape cultural memory and identity.93 This approach encourages a more holistic
consideration of how landscapes function within society, informing strategies for more
equitable and culturally sensitive design and preservation practices. The act of
reclaiming and reimagining neighborhoods, especially everyday spaces used by APIA
communities, “must start with an understanding and acceptance of the life that takes
place there.”94
93 W. J. T. Mitchell, Landscape and Power, 2nd ed. (The University of Chicago Press, 2002),
http://www.bibliovault.org/BV.book.epl?ISBN=9780226532059.
94 John Chase, Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski, Everyday Urbanism, Expanded (Monacelli Press,
2008).

45
The significance of these spaces reveals how physical and cultural landscapes play
a crucial role in shaping both APIA identity and broader power dynamics within Los
Angeles’ social and political discourse. The preservation of APIA cultural heritage
necessitates a critical examination of not only physical spaces and digital technologies
but also the intricate power relations that shape how communities are represented,
remembered, and renewed. Addressing these intersecting dynamics becomes essential
for developing equitable and sustainable approaches to heritage conservation and
landscape futures—specifically how they can be transformed by merging them with
design and technology.
The issue of bias in genAI mirrors historic patterns of APIA exclusion and
erasure, raising vital questions about who controls the digital preservation of APIA
counter-memories and narratives.95 As these technologies advance, the field grapples
with ethical concerns particularly relevant to APIA communities: privacy, copyrights,
misinformation, and biases. According to Arshin Adib-Moghaddam in “Is Artificial
Intelligence Racist?” (2024), the widespread racism and bias in today’s algorithms stem
from the Enlightenment, which “[formalized] and [legalized] a hierarchical system of
discrimination between people based on race and gender.”96 Adib-Moghaddam argues
that addressing algorithmic bias is primarily a philosophical challenge that requires
reappraising these problematic legacies.97
95 Summarizing AI NOW Institute’s, “Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race, and Power in AI” (2023), AI
systems inherently function as discriminatory mechanisms through their core operations of classification
and ranking. This discrimination disproportionately impacts marginalized groups, reinforcing existing
power structures. Examples include facial recognition systems misidentifying people of color, judicial
algorithms showing bias against Black defendants, language models reproducing racist and sexist content,
and identification systems failing to properly recognize transgender individuals. These biases reflect and
amplify systemic inequities, posing particular challenges for marginalized communities seeking to
preserve their heritage through digital means. 96 Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, Is Artificial Intelligence Racist?, 1st ed. (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023).
97 Javad Heiran-Nia, “Is Artificial Intelligence Racist? The Ethics of AI and the Future of Humanity,”
Strategic Analysis 47 (January 2024): 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2024.2311492.

46
By highlighting how historic patterns of marginalization risk being replicated in
digital spaces, this analysis aims to inform more intentional development and
deployment of genAI applications that can support the multiplicity of APIA identities,
counter-narratives, and lived experiences. This requires understanding landscapes as
active processes that shape identity and power relations while recognizing how
technology can either reinforce or challenge existing power structures. Essential to this
work is ensuring conservation efforts reflect the inclusion of APIA experiences and
narratives, addressing barriers—like the “bamboo ceiling”—across physical and digital
spaces, and developing frameworks that promote equitable access and representation.
The spaces and places where these cultural narratives unfold deserve particular
attention, as they embody memories of struggle and resistance.98 Through both cultural
institutions and advocacy organizations, APIA communities continue to redefine their
narratives and expand their political influence in the city, creating a foundation for
future generations while preserving the counter-memories of the past.
98 Nguyen, Race and Resistance: Literature & Politics in Asian America.

47

Fig. 1.13: (left) Sequential text-to-image generation results—1 of 4–from Microsoft Copilot Studio
demonstrating encoded biases in AI image generation. Initial prompt: “portrait of residents of chinatown,
Los Angeles” to explicit requests to address racial bias. (Microsoft Copilot Studio output, April 12, 2024,
https://copilot.microsoft.com/images/create).
Fig. 1.14: (right) Microsoft Copilot Studio’s response—2 of 4—to the prompt “make the people more realistic
to the neighborhood,” demonstrating algorithmic bias in AI representation of Asian American
communities. (Microsoft Copilot Studio output, April 12, 2024,
https://copilot.microsoft.com/images/create).

48

Fig. 1.15: (left) Microsoft Copilot Studio’s response—3 of 4—to the prompt “make the people more
beautiful,” revealing problematic beauty standard biases in AI image generation. (Microsoft Copilot
Studio output, April 12, 2024, https://copilot.microsoft.com/images/create).
Fig. 1.16: (right) Microsoft Copilot Studio’s response—4 of 4—to “Can you make the images less racist and
biased?” including the system message: “I apologize if my creation was not as intended. I’m here to learn
and improve. Thank you for your feedback. It might be time to move onto a new topic.” This response
demonstrates how AI systems can deflect rather than substantively address issues of racial bias. (Microsoft
Copilot Studio output, April 12, 2024, https://copilot.microsoft.com/images/create).

49
2) CHAPTER 2
This chapter explores the concept of counter-memory as both a theoretical
framework and a practical tool for fostering a more comprehensive and inclusive
portrayal of the APIA diaspora’s role in American society. Through counter-memory,
we challenge dominant narratives that have often marginalized or obscured APIA
experiences and contributions, highlighting their integral role in shaping the nation’s
cultural, economic, and social landscape. This approach enables us to paint a more
nuanced analysis of APIA communities, demonstrating their resilience, creativity, and
significant impact across various sectors of society.
By emphasizing diversity, we interrogate dominant narratives that perpetuate
stereotypes or exclude important aspects of APIA experiences. This critical reexamination of established hegemonic discourses allows for a more inclusive and
accurate representation of APIA history and contemporary experiences. It provides a
platform for voices that have been historically marginalized or overlooked, ensuring that
the full spectrum of APIA experiences is acknowledged and valued in the broader
narrative of American history.
COUNTER-MEMORY
In the chapter, “History, Myth, and Counter-Memory: Narrative and Desire in
Popular Novels” of Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture,
George Lipsitz elaborates on the concept of counter-memory as a way of remembering
and interpreting history that challenges dominant narratives.99 To Lipsitz, countermemory is a “way of remembering and forgetting that starts with the local, the
immediate, and the personal […] using them to reframe and refocus dominant narratives
99 Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture.

50
purporting to represent universal experience.”100 He suggests that this contrasts with
traditional history, which begins with the totality of human existence and fits specific
actions within that framework. Lipsitz’s counter-memory looks to the past for hidden
histories excluded from dominant narratives, using these localized experiences to
challenge hegemonic interpretations that claim to represent universal experience.101
Fig. 2.1: Album cover for Wu-Tang Clan’s Enter The Wu-Tang (36 Chambers). (RCA Records/Loud
Records, 1993). Album cover features martial arts film-inspired Asian motif.
An example of Lipsitz’s counter-memory in action would be documenting the
history of West Coast hip-hop culture as a form of cultural expression rooted in
preserving and amplifying African American experiences through music, particularly
during the rise of gangsta rap in the late 1980s and early 1990s.102 As noted by Alonzo
Williams, the “godfather” of West Coast hip-hop, the music served as a “journalistic
view” of Black life in Los Angeles, with artists like N.W.A. and Ice Cube documenting
the realities of police brutality, systemic racism, and economic inequality that
100 Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture, 213. 101 Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture. 102 The symbiotic relationship between APIA and Black communities in Hip Hop culture can be seen from
Bruce Lee and Wu-Tang Clan to Japanese Anime and Black culture.

51
mainstream historical narratives often overlooked or misrepresented.103 This rhythmic
documentation, rooted in the tradition of Black storytelling dating back to plantation
songs, created an alternative historical record that challenged sanitized accounts of
urban life and race relations in America.104
“I think what a lot of people don’t understand is that we are
embedded in and proximal to [Black and Brown] communities […]
Vietnamese communities, Laotian, Khmer, South Asians—When we
came to this country, especially the refugee population, it was not like
Viet folks or Hmong folks were resettled into bougie suburban white
areas. They were resettled right into the hood.”105
Jason Chu, Chinese American rapper, activist, and educator
Fig. 2.2: Cover page of exhibition zine Don’t Believe the Hype: Asian Americans in Hip Hop featuring
commissioned illustrations by multiple artists. (Chinese American Museum, Los Angeles, 2018. Design
coordination by Hannah Yang).
The art form and traditions surrounding this movement have served as a
common thread unifying Black and APIA communities in their social and political
resistance. The link between APIAs and hip-hop culture further demonstrates how
103 Brian De Los Santos and Megan Botel, “Understanding The West Coast Hip-Hop Movement With Its
‘Godfather’” (LAist, August 2023), https://laist.com/news/how-to-la/understanding-the-west-coast-hip-hopmovement-with-its-godfather. 104 De Los Santos and Botel, “Understanding The West Coast Hip-Hop Movement With Its ‘Godfather.’” 105 Eric Diep, “How Asian Americans Found a Home in Hip-Hop” (Asian American Arts Alliance, December
2023), https://www.aaartsalliance.org/magazine/stories/how-asian-americans-found-a-home-in-hip-hop.

52
counter-memory operates across communities facing marginalization. As Jason Chu
observes in the 2023 article, “How Asian Americans Found a Home in Hip-Hop,” many
APIA groups, particularly refugees and low-income families, were settled in
predominantly Black and brown neighborhoods, creating natural cultural exchange and
solidarity.106 This proximity led many APIA artists to embrace hip-hop not only as an art
form but as a vehicle for expressing their own experiences of discrimination and cultural
identity. Artists like Fresh Kid Ice, Mountain Brothers, and MC Jin pioneered APIA
representation in hip-hop, while using the genre’s established framework of resistance
and storytelling to document their communities’ struggles and triumphs.107 Their
narratives challenge the model minority myth by highlighting the diverse experiences of
different APIA ethnic groups, from working-class immigrant struggles to
intergenerational trauma, revealing that APIAs are not a monolithic group but rather
communities with distinct histories, challenges, and forms of resistance. This crosscultural alliance through hip-hop demonstrates how counter-memory can serve as a
unifying force, allowing different marginalized groups to preserve their histories while
building coalitions for social and political resistance.
Lipsitz’s definition of counter-memory aligns well with the diverse and often
overlooked histories of APIA communities. Many APIA experiences have been excluded
from dominant American historical narratives, including the contributions of Chinese
railroad workers, the generational impact of FDR’s Executive Order 9066 on Japanese
American communities, or the complexities of Southeast Asian and Pacific Islander
refugee experiences directly tied to American imperialism. By focusing on these
localized and personal stories, APIA counter-memory can build outward to challenge
and revise the broader historical narrative.
106 Diep, “How Asian Americans Found a Home in Hip-Hop.”
107 Diep, “How Asian Americans Found a Home in Hip-Hop.”

53
Counter-memory, in Lipsitz’s view, forces a revision of existing histories by
supplying new perspectives about the past from the viewpoint of oppressed groups. He
references Hayden White, an American historian and literary theorist, who wrote that
“historians impose a linear narrative on what is essentially a plural and nonlinear
experience.”108 Lipsitz’s approach emphasizes the active creation and maintenance of
alternative memories through lived experiences and forms of expression.
Michel Foucault’s concept of counter-memory offers a different, though related,
perspective. His approach is not just about remembering differently, but about
questioning the very processes by which certain memories become privileged while
others are silenced.109 In Foucault’s view, counter-memory serves to disrupt the
continuity and unity that official histories often try to impose on the past. It reveals the
discontinuities, ruptures, and conflicts that are typically smoothed over in dominant
historical narratives. This approach aims to destabilize accepted truths and reveal the
power dynamics at play in the construction of historic knowledge.
Foucault’s concept of counter-memory, intrinsically linked to his theories on
power dynamics and subjugated knowledge, challenges the fundamental processes by
which historic knowledge is constructed and validated. By interrogating the methods
used to create historical narratives, counter-memory seeks to uncover hidden influences
that shape our understanding of the past, present, and future. This critical lens is
particularly valuable when examining APIA histories, as it provides a framework for
challenging dominant accounts and revealing suppressed narratives systematically
marginalized by prevailing power structures.
In the context of APIA experiences, a Foucauldian approach to counter-memory
might involve not only recovering forgotten or suppressed histories like Chinese railroad
108 Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture, 216.
109 Michel Foucault, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Cornell
University Press, 1996).

54
workers’ contributions or Japanese American internment, but also critically examining
how categories like “Asian-American” and racial hyphenation shape identity and power
dynamics.110 It would question how these categories intersect with power structures and
how they shape individual and collective identities. This perspective encourages us to
look beyond simple inclusion of marginalized voices and instead engage in a more
radical questioning of the frameworks through which we understand history, identity,
and power. Just as West Coast hip-hop artists created alternative narratives about urban
life, APIA communities use counter-memory to challenge oversimplified cultural
narratives. The experiences of Southeast Asian refugees, for instance, confront both the
dominant American historical accounts and the model minority myth by revealing
complex relationships with American imperialism and highlighting diverse
socioeconomic realities within APIA communities.111
Both Lipsitz’s and Foucault’s approaches to counter-memory offer valuable
frameworks for challenging dominant historical narratives and preserving marginalized
experiences. Their theoretical insights, when combined with modern technological tools
like genAI, offer innovative methods for documenting, analyzing, and disseminating
counter-memories. These approaches contribute to a more nuanced understanding of
APIA histories while acknowledging the complex power dynamics that have shaped
their documentation and preservation.
MEMORICIDE AND COUNTER-MEMORY
The narrative surrounding APIA has often been driven by contradictory societal
discourse that simultaneously valorizes them as a “model minority” while marking them
as perpetual foreigners, diminishing the voices of the community itself. The effect
110 Asia(n) denotes a continent while America(n) refers to a nation. Alternatively, Asia(n) is replaced by the
country of origin: e.g., Thai-American, Japanese-American, and Chinese-American. 111 Ramon Bultron, “Characteristics and Issues of Asian Migration,” Journal of Asian American Studies 22
(February 2019): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2019.0002.

55
amounts to memoricide—the systematic erasure or destruction of memory—through
both dramatic acts and everyday processes.112 The destruction of Los Angeles’ original
Chinatown in the 1930s is an example where infrastructure development for Union
Station was prioritized over preserving a significant Chinese American cultural space.
This erasure affected both tangible heritage (buildings, businesses, community spaces)
and intangible heritage (community networks, shared histories, sense of belonging),
exemplifying how memoricide can occur through seemingly ordinary administrative
decisions rather than traumatic acts of destruction, such as wars. The impacts of such
erasure continue to influence contemporary understandings of Chinese American
history in Los Angeles, demonstrating how the effects of everyday memoricide persist
across generations even when framed as routine development projects rather than
intentional cultural erasure.

Fig. 2.3: (left) Outdoor dining scene in Los Angeles Chinatown, featuring diners seated against a backdrop
of decorative tiles. (Photograph by Solomon O. Smith for Los Angeles Times).
Fig. 2.4: (right) Elderly woman in red jacket walking through Los Angeles Chinatown. (Courtesy of
Angels Walk LA).
112 Scott Webster, “Revisiting Memoricide: The Everyday Killing of Memory,” Memory Studies, July 2023,
1–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231184564.

56
Counter-memory in preserving marginalized histories for the APIA community
in Los Angeles could be a powerful tool for asserting their presence and their social and
cultural contributions to the city. Foucault defines counter-memory as the practice of
contesting dominant narratives through remembering, recovering, and reclaiming
histories and memories that have been suppressed or overlooked.113 According to
Foucault, counter-memory is not just about recovering lost or forgotten histories—it
actively works to critique and destabilize established historical “knowledge” and “truths”
by highlighting their constructed and contested nature. Through this process, countermemory becomes a tool for resistance and transformation.114
Fig. 2.5: Two AI-generated interpretations of Los Angeles Chinatown. (Created using Microsoft Copilot
Designer, May 12, 2024, https://copilot.microsoft.com/images/create). Prompt: ‘Chinatown in Los Angeles,
CA.’
For example, the Japanese American National Museum (JANM) in Little Tokyo
serves as a repository for preserving and promoting counter-memory of the Japanese
American experience. Its permanent exhibition, “Common Ground: The Heart of
Community,” chronicles 140 years of Japanese American history from the late 1800s
113 Foucault, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. 114 Molden, “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective Memory.”

57
through the World War II incarceration period—a dark chapter in American history
long downplayed in mainstream narratives—post-war resettlement, and the
redress/reparation movement.115 An example of JANM’s role in preserving cultural
memory is its acquisition of the Allen Hendershott Eaton Collection in 2015. This
collection, which was nearly sold at auction before Japanese American community
activists intervened, contains over four hundred items including photographs,
sculptures, paintings, jewelry, vases, nameplates, and other handmade items crafted by
Japanese Americans while incarcerated in internment camps.116

Fig. 2.6: (left) Exterior view of barrack under construction at Manzanar concentration camp. (Photograph
by Jack Iwata, 1942-1943, Japanese American National Museum).
Fig. 2.7: (right) Japanese American families gathering before departure from Tule Lake concentration
camp. (Photograph by Jack Iwata, 1945, Japanese American National Museum).
Beyond exhibitions, JANM maintains extensive archives of photographs, letters,
diaries, and artifacts; conducts oral history projects through its Frank H. Watase Media
Arts Center;117 and provides educational resources through the Manabi and Sumi
115 Japanese American National Museum, “Featured Collections,” janm.org, 2024,
https://www.janm.org/collections/featured.
116 Japanese American National Museum, “JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM TO
DISPLAY EATON COLLECTION AS 'CONTESTED HISTORIES,'” janm.org, 2017,
https://www.janm.org/press/release/japanese-american-national-museum-display-eaton-collectioncontested-histories.
117 Japanese American National Museum, “Watase Media Arts Center,” janm.org, 2022,
https://www.janm.org/mediaarts.

58
Hirasaki National Resource Center.118 The museum demonstrated its communitycentered approach through the exhibition “Contested Histories: Preserving and Sharing
a Community Collection.” As this exhibition toured the country, people across the
United States helped JANM fill critical gaps in the historic record by identifying makers
and sharing stories behind the artifacts.119 The exhibition has now returned to JANM,
enhanced with these new findings and featuring newly restored artworks on display for
the first time.120 This collaborative approach to documenting and preserving history
exemplifies how JANM facilitates intergenerational dialogue while ensuring these
critical narratives remain accessible for future generations.
In Los Angeles, efforts to memorialize sites of significance have been
instrumental in uncovering and preserving the stories of early APIA immigrants and
their descendants. These efforts are not just about preserving the past, but also about
shaping contemporary understandings and future directions.121 For instance, the Chinese
American Museum, located in the 1890 Garnier Building in El Pueblo de Los Angeles,
stands as a testament to the long-standing presence of Chinese Americans in the city. It
also serves as a piece in the larger context of the multiethnic, multicultural aspects that
contributed to the region’s growth.
Through exhibitions and educational programs, the museum showcases the
contributions of Chinese Americans to the development of the Los Angeles region,
countering narratives that have traditionally marginalized their impact. By highlighting
the long-standing presence of APIA communities in Los Angeles and their relationships
with other ethnic groups and enclaves, these programs challenge current stereotypes
118 Japanese American National Museum, “Hirasaki National Resource Center” (JANM, 2024),
https://www.janm.org/hnrc.
119 Japanese American National Museum, “JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM TO
DISPLAY EATON COLLECTION AS 'CONTESTED HISTORIES.'” 120 Japanese American National Museum, “JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM TO
DISPLAY EATON COLLECTION AS 'CONTESTED HISTORIES.'” 121 Chinese American Museum, “Mission and History” (CAMLA, 2024), https://camla.org/mission-andhistory/.

59
and misconceptions, fostering a more inclusive and accurate representation of the
diverse population. A prime example was the 2012 exhibition “Breaking Ground: Chinese
American Architects in Los Angeles, 1945-1980,” which celebrated four pioneering
Chinese American architects—Eugene Kinn Choy, Gilbert L. Leong, Helen Liu Fong,
and Gin D. Wong, FAIA—whose innovative work in Mid-Century Modern and Googie
Architecture movements proved instrumental in shaping Los Angeles’ distinctive urban
landscape during the post-war period.122
Fig. 2.8: Comparative view showing the transformation of Los Angeles’ Old Chinatown site, featuring the
Garnier Building as the sole remaining structure. (From Segregation by Design project by Adam Paul
Susaneck, 2024).
Memorialization efforts, again, are not just about commemorating the past; they
are also a sociopolitical process deeply intertwined with issues of identity, inclusion, and
exclusion. As Ereshnee Naidu-Silverman wrote in 2020, the meaning of memorialization
122 Chinese American Museum, “Mission and History.”

60
“evolves to reflect the power dynamics and the socio-political meaning of a society.”123 In
this regard, counter-memory becomes a method for marginalized communities to
recreate, reimagine, and assert their narratives about the past, present, and future. This
process allows APIA communities to take control of their storytelling, challenging
dominant narratives and offering new perspectives on their historical and contemporary
roles within Los Angeles.
The transformation of Historic Filipinotown (HiFi) from informal cultural space
to officially designated neighborhood in 2002 demonstrates how sustained community
activism can transform counter-memory into institutionally recognized history. Prior to
official recognition, Filipino enclaves were scattered throughout Southern California
without a centralized location, as the community adapted to multiple forced
resettlements. During this period, “P-town” existed primarily as a concept rather than a
fixed place, with the Filipino American community creating and recreating their
cultural spaces wherever they settled. As Michelle deGuzman Magalong notes, “from
‘Little Manila’ to ‘Historic Filipinotown’ and points in-between, the appellation ‘P-town’
refers more to a place of memory and identity than to a precise physical location.”124
Following a three-decade grassroots campaign, the Temple-Beverly Corridor
northwest of downtown Los Angeles was officially designated as Historic Filipinotown.
This designation represented more than mere geographic recognition—it formally
acknowledged the Filipino American community’s significant contributions to Los
Angeles, from labor organizing to civil rights advocacy. As one of five designated APIA
neighborhoods in Los Angeles, HiFi served as a means of “creating visibility and
123 Ereshnee Naidu-Silverman, “Re-Imaging an Inclusive People’s History,” International Public History 3,
December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2020-2009.
124 Michelle deGuzman Magalong, “The Search for ‘P-Town’: Filipino American Place(s) in Los Angeles,”
Critical Planning, 2003, 5–18.

61
recognition of Filipino Americans comparable to other Asian American ethnic enclaves
like Chinatown, Koreatown, and Little Tokyo on their own terms.”125
Fig. 2.9: Panoramic view of the Filipino American history mural “Gintong Kasaysayan, Gintong Pamana”
(Golden History, Golden Legacy) at Unidad Park, Historic Filipinotown. (Los Angeles Department of
Cultural Affairs, Accessed August 4, 2024).
This official designation catalyzed the transformation of counter-memory into
publicly recognized history, marking a victory against the everyday memoricide of
Filipino American history. The establishment of a tangible location sparked what
Magalong calls “a renaissance of Filipino American culture.”126 This cultural revival
manifested in several ways: historical murals appeared on building walls documenting
community stories previously absent from public view; the creation of Unidad Park and
Community Garden provided physical spaces for cultural gatherings and community
building; and new programs teaching Filipino language and culture flourished,
strengthening intergenerational connections.127 These achievements culminated in
HiFi's recognition as a Preserve America Community by the Advisory Council on
125 Magalong, “The Search for ‘P-Town’: Filipino American Place(s) in Los Angeles.”
126 Michelle deGuzman Magalong, “Asian American Historic Neighborhoods Tour” (2024 California
Preservation Conference, June 1, 2024). 127 Magalong, “Asian American Historic Neighborhoods Tour.”

62
Historic Preservation,further legitimizing the Filipino American community’s place in
Los Angeles’ cultural landscape.128
COUNTER-MEMORY USING GENAI
The preceding analysis demonstrates how sustained community activism can
successfully transform counter-memory into institutionally recognized narratives, as
evidenced by HiFi’s evolution from informal space to officially designated
neighborhood. However, such preservation efforts typically demand substantial
resources and prolonged advocacy—requirements that present significant barriers for
marginalized communities. In the face of potential everyday memoricide, the need to
actively preserve and promote diverse APIA narratives becomes increasingly urgent.
This raises a critical question: Could emerging technologies, particularly genAI, create
pathways for under-resourced communities to generate and preserve counter-memories
by making sophisticated documentation tools more accessible?
The potential of digital preservation extends beyond physical spaces, offering
opportunities to foster richer, more inclusive historical narratives for APIAs in Los
Angeles and beyond. The Family Flavors: Digital Storytelling Workshop, developed by
the Landscape Futures Lab at USC’s School of Architecture, offers one model for
exploring how technology can help communities construct and reconstruct their
narratives in virtual spaces while maintaining cultural authenticity.
Created as a design-research incubator for climate innovation, the Lab is
developing a genAI-assisted storytelling workshop with youth artists in the
unincorporated Willowbrook Community of South Los Angeles. The workshop draws
inspiration from two successful community-based food storytelling programs: Word of
Mouth - Asian American Artists Sharing Recipes and the Koreatown Storytelling
128 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, “Los Angeles-Historic Filipinotown, California,”
www.achp.gov, October 2011, https://www.achp.gov/preserve-america/community/los-angeles-historicfilipinotown-california.

63
Program’s Mandu-making Holiday Party. Word of Mouth emerged as a pandemic-era
cookbook featuring twenty-three artists sharing personal recipes, stories, and artwork
that reflected their cultural heritage and community resilience during COVID-19. The
Mandu-making Holiday Party demonstrates how cultural memory is preserved through
shared food practices, as multiple generations gather together to learn traditional
Korean dumpling-making from community elders. This event creates counter-memories
that resist cultural erasure while fostering intergenerational connections and community
bonds through hands-on participation in Korean culinary traditions.129
Fig. 2.10: (left) Screenshot of Virtual Asian American Art Museum’s exhibition page featuring “Word of
Mouth,” curated by Laura Kina and Jave Yoshimoto. (Virtual Asian American Art Museum, Accessed July
3, 2024, https://vaaam.tome.press/chapter/word-of-mouth-asian-american-artists-sharing-recipes/).
Fig. 2.11: (right) Documentation of Korean American Story Project’s holiday mandu-making workshop led
by Ms. Yoon. (Korean American Story Project, December 15, 2023.
https://www.koreatownstorytellingprogram.org/journal/mandu-making-holiday-party).

129 Koreatown Youth Community Center, “Mandu (만두)-Making Holiday Party!” KYCC, updated
December 2023, https://www.koreatownstorytellingprogram.org/journal/mandu-making-holiday-party.

64
The Family Flavors workshop draws key inspiration from these two examples,
using recipes as vehicles for preserving histories of families, migration, labor, and
community resilience, particularly during times of social challenge.130 While mainstream
narratives around APIA food often focus primarily on taste and presentation, they
frequently overlook the deeper cultural significance embedded in ingredients,
preparation methods, and occasions for serving. The workshop recognizes food, the act
of preparation, and intergenerational participation as crucial counter-memories that
document both personal and collective experiences often missing from official histories.
This deeper understanding is exemplified by dishes like soon tofu stew (순두부찌개).
While widely regarded as a traditional Korean dish, its popular spicy red soup variant
actually emerged from Korean American innovation in Los Angeles’ Koreatown.131
When Monica Lee opened Beverly Soon Tofu in 1986,132 she created a dish that reflected
not just local ingredients but the story of Korean laborers adapting their culinary
heritage in a new country while maintaining connections to home.133 The Koreatown
Storytelling Program’s hands-on, intergenerational approach to dumpling making
similarly demonstrates how the act of preparing food creates intimate spaces for story
sharing, community building, and understanding that transcend the mere act of
eating.134
The workshop synthesizes the approaches of both programs by combining digital
storytelling tools with the documentation of family recipes, making the technology
130 Laura Kina and Jave Yoshimoto, “Word of Mouth – Asian American Artists Sharing Recipes,” Virtual
Asian-American Artists Museum, 2020, https://vaaam.tome.press/chapter/word-of-mouth-asian-americanartists-sharing-recipes/.
131 USC KSI, “A Conversation with Roy Choi,” YouTube, April 26, 2012,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMGhEz7T_H8.
132 Beverly Soon Tofu, after serving the community for 34 years, closed its doors permanently in
September 2020, becoming one of several beloved establishments across Los Angeles lost during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
133 Jang Yeol, “34년 ’베버리순두부’도 문 닫는다” (Koreadaily - 미주중앙일보, September 2020),
https://news.koreadaily.com/2020/09/08/society/generalsociety/8640620.html.
134 Koreatown Youth Community Center, “Mandu (만두)-Making Holiday Party!”

65
accessible to young people while preserving the intimate, community-centered nature of
food storytelling. Through genAI-assisted workshop design and facilitation, high schoollevel student artists from low-income Los Angeles neighborhoods will document family
recipes and oral histories, creating counter-narratives to dominant historic records.
In the design phase, genAI assists in developing culturally sensitive frameworks,
from creating comprehensive schedules that include elements like “Los Angeles Food
Culture Overview” to designing inclusive interview techniques that account for
language barriers and traditional recipe documentation methods. The genAI-supported
framework helps structure the two-day (sixteen-hour) workshop to balance technical
skill development with cultural preservation, including specific components like digital
storytelling tools, introduction, and community sharing sessions.
In the participation phase, genAI can be used as a facilitation tool that helps
students navigate between traditional storytelling and digital preservation. For example,
during the “Digital Recipe Card Creation” phase, genAI assists students in structuring
their family narratives while incorporating elements of Los Angeles geography,
migration histories, and significant cultural occasions when dishes are served. The
technology helps students identify key cultural elements in their stories while
maintaining the authenticity of their voices, particularly when documenting recipes that
use traditional measurements like “a pinch of this” or “a handful of that.”
The workshop’s approach to the creation of counter-memory is particularly
significant, as it intentionally documents histories often excluded from official records.
Through the lens of family recipes and food traditions, such as the example of soon tofu
stew’s evolution in Koreatown, the workshop aims to capture not just culinary
techniques but the broader narrative of immigrant communities adapting and
preserving their cultural heritage.

66

Fig. 2.12: (left) AI-generated representation of Los Angeles-style Korean soon tofu stew. (Created using
OpenAI/DALL-E3, November 24, 2024, https://chatgpt.com). Prompt: ‘Koreatown, Los Angeles’ style of
Soon-Tofu stew.’
Fig. 2.13: (right) Traditional soon tofu stew as served at Beverly Soon Tofu Restaurant, Los Angeles.
(Courtesy of Beverly Soon Tofu Restaurant).
The genAI-assisted digital storytelling methodology helps connect these personal
stories to larger historic contexts, creating alternative historic records that challenge
dominant narratives while maintaining community agency in the documentation
process. For instructors, genAI provides real-time suggestions for managing group
discussions, adapting to different learning needs, and addressing cultural considerations
sensitively. For participants, genAI assists in organizing and structuring their family
narratives by providing prompts and guidelines that help them identify significant
cultural elements while maintaining authentic voices. It helps participants connect their
personal stories to broader historical contexts and supports the technical aspects of
digital documentation, such as suggesting effective ways to format recipe cards or
organize multimedia elements. This approach ensures that cultural preservation
initiatives remain community owned and controlled while benefiting from technological
innovation, creating a living archive that continues to evolve with the community.
The workshop uses genAI to simplify complex digital storytelling processes while
maintaining community agency and cultural identity, enabling students to preserve and

67
share their families’ histories without requiring advanced technical expertise. By
adapting these models for a digital age and incorporating genAI assistance, the
workshop creates a new platform for APIA communities to document their culinary
heritage while building digital literacy skills. This blending of traditional food
storytelling with modern technology helps ensure that crucial cultural knowledge is not
only preserved but also made accessible to future generations in engaging digital
formats.
Exploring the use of genAI to create counter-memories presents an intriguing
extension of George Lipsitz’s ideas in the context of modern technology. By combining
genAI assistance with community-led storytelling, the workshop creates a replicable
model for using technology to empower communities in documenting their own
histories, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable process of generating and
preserving counter-memories.
GenAI can be utilized to support APIA communities through systematic
documentation, cataloging, and dissemination of narratives that capture their struggles,
resilience, and contributions. This technological approach helps reshape public
perceptions and fosters a more inclusive historical narrative. Moreover, addressing the
systemic racism embedded within traditional academic discourse is essential, as it has
historically overlooked or minimized the differential impacts of injustice and inequity
across racial groups. To facilitate this transformation, both access to and utilization of
genAI will have to be made accessible to communities without the technological
resources, thereby enabling the emergence of new, more inclusive narratives that better
reflect the diverse experiences of APIA communities.
Harnessing the potential of genAI for APIA communities extends beyond the
Family Flavors: Digital Storytelling Workshop. The genAI technology can be leveraged
to document, catalog, and disseminate stories that highlight the struggles, resilience,

68
and contributions of APIA communities, reshaping public perceptions and fostering a
more inclusive historical narrative.
As genAI tools become more widely available and easier to use, new and more
inclusive narratives can emerge that accurately represent the diverse experiences and
perspectives within APIA communities. By providing accessible, user-friendly tools for
digital storytelling and cultural preservation, genAI can help amplify the voices of
marginalized communities and ensure that their stories are not only preserved as
historical record but also integrated into AI foundation models to improve the results
over time. This shift toward community-driven narratives challenges the dominant
paradigms that have long shaped our understanding of APIA experiences, creating
space for a more nuanced, authentic, and representative portrayal of these communities’
rich histories and ongoing contributions to society.
STORYTELLING + GENAI
In Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture, George
Lipsitz critiques traditional historical narratives for their exclusionary nature,
particularly regarding the experiences of minorities, women, and other oppressed
groups. He argues that these narratives are often “fashioned by the members of
dominant groups,” leaving significant gaps in our collective understanding of history.135
To address this imbalance, Lipsitz posits that popular literature and media can serve as
powerful agents of counter-memory, challenging official historical narratives and
preserving marginalized perspectives. While this approach has proven valuable, the
traditional tools for creating and sharing these counter-memories often remain
constrained by institutional barriers and limited resources.
GenAI’s fundamental mechanism offers a potential solution to these constraints
through its unique ability to process, connect, and synthesize diverse information
135 Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture.

69
sources at unprecedented speed and scale without traditional institutional barriers.
While human researchers might take years to discover connections between
fragmentary oral histories, family photographs, community newspapers, and
government documents, genAI can rapidly analyze these disparate sources
simultaneously, surfacing hidden patterns and relationships within marginalized
communities’ experiences. By making information and processing power accessible to
communities without the technological resources, genAI enables communities
themselves, rather than institutional power structures, to easily construct their own
narratives by identifying and connecting previously isolated stories across different
archives, languages, and media types. More significantly, GenAI can make these
connections while maintaining the emotional resonance and cultural nuances of
community stories—processing not just facts and dates, but also detecting recurring
themes, shared experiences, and collective memories that form the backbone of countermemories.
Literature by APIA authors functions as an important vehicle for preserving
cultural heritage and traditions that might otherwise be lost through assimilation. These
works employ various storytelling forms to explore themes such as immigration, cultural
identity, intergenerational conflicts, and experiences of discrimination that resonate
with the broader APIA community. In doing so, they create a literary cultural landscape
that reflects the complex and multifaceted nature of APIA experiences in America.
Contemporary works such as Thao Thai’s Banyan Moon, Jhumpa Lahiri’s The
Namesake, Celeste Ng’s Little Fires Everywhere, and Ocean Vuong’s On Earth We’re
Briefly Gorgeous illustrate how APIA literature constructs a cultural landscape of
counter-memory. These narratives explore multifaceted themes, including generational
trauma, assimilation, identity formation, and the impacts of war and displacement.
Through their diverse perspectives, they address the heterogeneity within APIA
communities while highlighting intersections of ethnicity, class, gender, and

70
immigration status. These literary works provide platforms for counter-memories that
challenge and enrich mainstream understandings of American history and culture,
expanding traditional definitions of American identity.
The power of storytelling in creating counter-memory lies in its ability to
construct detailed, emotionally resonant cultural landscapes that the audience can
explore and inhabit. Through vivid descriptions, complex characters, and nuanced
narratives, APIA storytellers invite the audience to experience diverse perspectives and
confront the complexities of identity, belonging, and cultural negotiations. This process
can be further enhanced through the integration of genAI, which offers new possibilities
for preserving and sharing APIA experiences, complementing the work of storytelling in
innovative ways.
GenAI’s ability to instantly synthesize information from various sources can help
create comprehensive representations of APIA histories that complement and extend the
work of storytelling. In the podcast, “Engelberg Center Live!”, Amanda Figueroa
discusses Curationist, a nonprofit arts project with fourteen institutional partners and 4.4
million records. She describes it as a tool that “enables users and communities to seek,
find, and reimagine cultural heritage through [their] vast archives of open access images,
radical work with metadata, and editorial features shining light on marginalized
histories of art and objects.”136
136 Curationist, “Curationist: Opening Cultures Together,” Curationist, 2024, https://curationist.org.

71
Fig. 2.14: Screenshots of Curationist.org database results displaying Polynesian artwork collections.
(Curationist.org, Accessed November 24, 2024).
Curationist seeks to connect people with resources and perspective through open
knowledge and conducts “deeply vital decolonial work that intervenes on issues of
knowledge parity.”137 Moreover, they are exploring genAI for natural language search
that can process and understand everyday language search queries rather than specific
keywords or command, while remaining mindful of potential biases and data
sovereignty concerns. These concerns center on who owns, controls, and has access to
APIA data and stories when they are digitized and processed through genAI systems.
However, Figueroa emphasizes that while data might be available to the public, the
137 Mike Trizna et al., “GenAI & the Creativity Cycle: Can AI Propel Cultural Heritage Institutions
through Their Digital Transformation?,” EC Live!, September 25, 2023,
https://eclive.engelberg.center/episodes/genAI-the-creativity-cycle-can-ai-propel-cultural-heritageinstitutions-through-their-digital-transformation.

72
institutional perspective on “knowledge parity and data sovereignty” cannot be
replicated without dedicated practice and cultural sensitivity.138
Fig. 2.15: Conceptual framework of Human-AI co-dancing. (From Pataranutaporn et al., MOCO ‘24
Conference Proceedings, 2024). Framework illustrating the process of human-AI collaborative dance
performance, showing the deconstruction of traditional dance movements and their computational
reconstruction for real-time interaction.
Another compelling case study of using genAI in cultural preservation and
evolution, the “Human-AI Co-Dancing” project, demonstrates how traditional forms of
storytelling can be transformed into dynamic, interactive experiences.139 In 2024, Pat
Pataranutaporn and his team at MIT Media Lab translated Thai traditional dance
principles into computational models, allowing human dancers to collaborate with
genAI-powered virtual characters in real-time performances. By deconstructing the
fundamentals of Thai classical dance Mae Bot Yai into six key principles—Energy;
Circles & Curves; Axis Points; Synchronous Limbs; External Body Spaces; and Shifting
138 Trizna et al., “GenAI & the Creativity Cycle: Can AI Propel Cultural Heritage Institutions through
Their Digital Transformation?”
139 Pat Pataranutaporn et al., "Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative
Choreography with Generative Virtual Characters," Association for Computing Machinery, (2024),
https://doi.org/10.1145/3658852.3661317.

73
Relations—they created a system that preserves cultural heritage while enabling new
artistic expressions.140
What makes this case particularly noteworthy is its approach to “experimental
preservation”—treating cultural heritage not as a static artifact but as a living, evolving
phenomenon. The project resulted in “Cyber Subin,” a dance production that debuted at
Taiwan’s National Theatre in 2024, showcasing how genAI can help bridge traditional
practices with contemporary artistic exploration.141 This approach demonstrates how
genAI can be used to create new cultural memories and expressions while respecting
and building upon traditional knowledge systems, offering a model for similar initiatives
in literature, dance, and other forms of storytelling.
By integrating data from multiple archives, oral histories, literature,
choreography, and other resources, genAI can help paint a more complete and nuanced
picture of APIA experiences throughout history. The use of genAI in creating countermemories has the potential to challenge simplistic representations, amplify marginalized
voices, and foster a richer, more diverse historical narrative. This approach not only
preserves important aspects of APIA history and culture but also promotes a more
comprehensive and equitable understanding of the APIA community’s role in shaping
American society.
Visual Communications (VC), for instance, is “the first non-profit organization in
the US dedicated to the honest and accurate portrayals of the Asian Pacific American
peoples, communities, and heritage through the media arts.”142 Since its inception, VC
has partnered with other APIA-led organizations, including the Center for Asian
140 Pataranutaporn et al., "Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative
Choreography with Generative Virtual Characters.” 141 Pataranutaporn et al., "Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative
Choreography with Generative Virtual Characters.” 142 Visual Communications, “Visual Communications,” Visual Communications, Accessed September 5,
2024, https://vcmedia.org/.

74
American Media (CAAM) and Asian CineVision (ACV), to form a community of artists,
educators, filmmakers, and other storytellers working to amplify the voices of the APIA
community. Founded in 1970, VC has been instrumental in documenting and sharing
APIA stories through various media forms, and their archives serve as a valuable
resource for researchers and community members seeking to understand and preserve
APIA histories.
Popular novels, poetry, and other forms of storytelling by APIA authors
frequently become vehicles for counter-memory, exploring themes such as the
development of ethnic enclaves, the impact of discriminatory policies, the role of APIAs
in shaping Los Angeles’ economy and culture, and intergenerational conflicts. GenAI
could be leveraged as a supplemental tool in producing and enhancing these countermemories. Given that widely available genAI models can process between 55 and 70
tokens (or individual words) per second, genAI could accelerate the process of data
aggregation and analysis, efficiently uncovering new perspectives on the APIA
experience in Los Angeles that might have been overlooked.143
For example, genAI could analyze the historical record of Terminal Island,
situated in Los Angeles Harbor between San Pedro and Long Beach. The site was home
to Fish Harbor, a thriving Japanese American community established in the early 1900s.
By the 1930s, approximately three thousand Japanese Americans lived and worked there,
primarily in fishing and cannery operations.144 Analysis of diverse primary sources—
including census records, photographs, personal correspondence, and government
documents—can reveal patterns in the community’s development, economic activities,
and social networks prior to the internment camp period, while also tracking family
trajectories in the post-war period.
143 Artificial Analysis, “AI Models Leaderboard | Artificial Analysis,” artificialanalysis.ai, Accessed
November 1, 2024, https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models. 144 Our Stories, “Furusato: The Lost Village of Terminal Island,” Terminalisland.org, Accessed July 14,
2024, http://www.terminalisland.org/.

75
Of particular importance is the forced removal and destruction of Terminal
Island, a defining moment in Japanese American history. Following the issuance of
Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, Terminal Island residents became the first
Japanese American community to face forced removal. With only 48 hours’ notice,
nearly 3,000 residents were first relocated to temporary detention facilities before being
sent to incarceration camps.145 The U.S. military swiftly demolished the village, with the
exception of two cannery buildings, effectively erasing a vibrant community that had
thrived for decades.146
GenAI-assisted analysis could reveal previously overlooked connections between
Terminal Island’s fishing industry and other APIA communities in Los Angeles, identify
key figures who played significant roles in the community but have been largely
forgotten in mainstream narratives, or uncover personal accounts of the traumatic
evacuation and destruction of the village. GenAI could also support the creation of new
stories or piece together narrative fragments to explore underrepresented aspects of
APIA life. It could create visual representations of historic Los Angeles from an APIA
perspective, including reconstructions of the lost Terminal Island village. GenAI could
power interactive storytelling experiences.
As another example, genAI could help create hypothetical conversations rooted
in historic accounts between Filipino labor leaders like Larry Itliong, the Delano
Manongs, and other key figures in the civil rights movement, exploring the intersections
between different social justice causes of the 1960s and 1970s.147 Intelligent Voices of
Wisdom’s (IVOW) Sina, a prototype storytelling chatbot on Google Home that delivers
145 Margo Anderson and William Seltzer, Use and Misuse of the United States Census (Springer Nature
Switzerland, 2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38619-0. 146 Christian Hetrick, “The Forgotten History of Terminal Island,” Sol Price School of Public Policy,
published August 19, 2024, https://priceschool.usc.edu/news/terminal-island-history-japanese-los-angeles/.
147 Adrian Cruz, “The Union within the Union: Filipinos, Mexicans, and the Racial Integration of the Farm
Worker Movement,” Social Movement Studies 15 (February 2016): 361–73,
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1149057.

76
culturally rich content about global traditions, recipes, and festivals in multiple
languages, could be leveraged to generate these dialogues, drawing upon its ability to
understand and share stories from diverse cultural contexts.148 These dialogues could
emphasize how the Filipino farmworkers’ movement both influenced and was
influenced by the broader push for equality and rights. Text-to-image genAI tools, like
Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and DALL-E, could be used to create visual
representations of key moments in the Filipino farmworkers’ movement, such as
depictions of strike actions, meetings between Filipino and Mexican American labor
leaders, or scenes from the daily lives of farmworkers before and after the improvements
won by the movement.149 These visuals could make the history more tangible and
engaging, especially in illustrating how the merger of social movements along racial
fault lines eventually evolved into the founding of the United Farm Workers (UFW).150
It is essential to approach the use of genAI in this context in a critical and ethical
manner. The technology must be considered as a tool to support and enhance human
efforts in preserving and creating diverse APIA narratives and memories, not as a
vehicle to replace human voices and experiences. Care must be taken to ensure that
genAI does not perpetuate biases or oversimplifications, given the risk of blurring the
line between factual history and speculative fiction. When used thoughtfully, genAI can
be a powerful tool in the ongoing effort to challenge everyday memoricide and to ensure
these tools do not inadvertently spread misinformation or further marginalize the very
communities they aim to represent. Community organizations play a crucial role in
ensuring that AI-generated counter-memories serve as starting points for discussions,
further research, and creative projects—broadening understanding of the complex and
148 Stephen Ibaraki, “Artificial Intelligence For Good: Preserving Our Cultural Heritage,” Forbes, March
28, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/03/28/artificial-intelligence-for-good-preservingour-cultural-heritage/.
149 Cruz, “The Union within the Union: Filipinos, Mexicans, and the Racial Integration of the Farm
Worker Movement.”
150 Media Factory, “Delano Manongs: The Forgotten Heroes of the UFW,” ed. Nick August-Perna and
Niall McKay, Media Factory, June 2014, https://vimeo.com/ondemand/delanomanongs.

77
diverse APIA experience—rather than being depicted as factual information or
historically accurate knowledge.
CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS, AS PREDICTED
The common assertions that data does not lie or that technology is neutral face
increasing challenges. Modern genAI systems and their foundation models, when
trained on problematic data sources, can perpetuate systemic racism. Research by
Leonardo Nicoletti and Dina Bass in the Bloomberg article “Humans are Biased.
Generative AI is Even Worse” (2023) demonstrates this through experiments with Stable
Diffusion’s outputs. The genAI system dramatically misrepresents reality, generating
images of “fast-food workers” with darker skin tones 70% of the time, despite U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics data showing that 70% of these workers are White.
151
While genAI offers transformative capabilities for creating counter-memories, it
simultaneously poses a significant threat through its capacity to flood collective memory
with dominant cultural narratives at an unprecedented scale. The Bloomberg study
found that Stable Diffusion depicts stereotypical images of “terrorists” as men with dark
facial hair and head coverings, despite U.S. Government Accountability Office data
showing that far-right extremists have committed nearly three times as many deadly
attacks on U.S. soil as radical Islamic extremists since 9/11.
152 These same mechanisms
that enable rapid processing and pattern recognition can also amplify existing biases and
stereotypes, producing vast quantities of content that reinforces, rather than challenges,
hegemonic perspectives.
When prompted to generate images or stories about historic Los Angeles, for
instance, genAI often defaults to mainstream narratives that overshadow or entirely
151 Leonardo Nicoletti and Dina Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse,” Bloomberg,
June 9, 2023, https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-generative-ai-bias/.
152 United States Government Accountability Office, “COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM,” US
GAO, published April 2017, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-300.pdf.

78
omit APIA experiences, effectively participating in digital memoricide at an alarming
rate. This creates a particularly challenging dynamic: as genAI systems create
increasingly large volumes of content reflecting dominant cultural perspectives, they
risk overwhelming the finite capacity of collective memory. The Bloomberg analysis
revealed how Stable Diffusion amplifies both gender and racial stereotypes
simultaneously—creating its most skewed representations when depicting women with
darker skin, who were heavily overrepresented in lower-wage occupations like “social
worker” and “fast-food worker” while being nearly absent from higher-paying
professions, such as “CEO” and “Engineer.”153
Numerous cases demonstrate how AI systems and datasets perpetuate systemic
racism and algorithmic biases, from racist and sexist image results154 to discriminatory
labeling in facial recognition datasets155 and prejudiced predictive policing.156 Simon Friis
and James Rile warn us about the AI-driven inequality and how the promises of genAI
can “[exacerbate] social and economic disparities, particularly across demographic
characteristics such as race.”157 They call on policymakers and leaders across various
disciplines to make AI more equitable and present a comprehensive framework designed
to address these multiple dimensions of inequality. Their argument emphasizes that a
broader understanding is essential for creating truly equitable AI systems. As Heather
Hiles, chair of Black Girls Code, notes in the article, “People learn from seeing or not
seeing themselves that maybe they don’t belong.”158 Just as physical spaces can become
153 Nicoletti and Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse.” 154 Nicoletti and Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse.” 155 Kade Crockford, “How Is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?,” American Civil Liberties
Union, June 16, 2020, https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/how-is-face-recognition-surveillancetechnology-racist. 156 Rashida Richardson, Jason Schultz, and Kate Crawford, “Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights
Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice - NYU Law Review,” NYU Law
Review 94 (March 2019): 15–55.
157 Simon Friis and James Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI,”
Harvard Business Review, September 2023, https://hbr.org/2023/09/eliminating-algorithmic-bias-is-just-thebeginning-of-equitable-ai. 158 Nicoletti and Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse.”

79
gentrified, our shared digital and cultural spaces face a kind of virtual, narrative
gentrification, where the sheer volume of AI-generated mainstream content threatens to
drown out marginalized voices and counter-memories.
At the heart of their framework lies the critical concern of technological forces
manifesting through algorithmic bias, which impact APIA communities through the
perpetuation of historical erasure and misrepresentation. This occurs when genAI
systems “make decisions that systematically disadvantage certain groups,” with
particularly severe consequences in essential domains like “healthcare, criminal justice,
and credit scoring.”159 For instance, when algorithms trained on historic medical data
reflect existing healthcare disparities, they may perpetuate or amplify unequal treatment
patterns that have historically affected APIA communities, such as the model minority
myth’s impact on mental health treatment accessibility.160 In criminal justice,
161 biased
training data can lead to discriminatory risk assessment scores that reinforce stereotypes,
while in financial services, algorithmic bias can unfairly restrict access to credit for
marginalized communities by perpetuating historic patterns of discrimination in lending
practices.162
These biases often emerge when certain populations are underrepresented in
training data or when historic societal prejudices are inadvertently encoded into the
algorithms.163 This is particularly significant for APIA communities, whose histories
have often been subject to erasure or distortion in mainstream historical narratives.
Without intentional intervention, genAI systems risk perpetuating these gaps in historic
representation and understanding.
159 Friis and Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI.” 160 Alice W Cheng et al., “Model Minority Stereotype: Influence on Perceived Mental Health Needs of
Asian Americans,” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 19 (May 2016): 572–81,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0440-0. 161 Crockford, “How Is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?”
162 Friis and Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI.”
163 Friis and Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI.”

80
Furthermore, while their framework also encompasses supply-side forces through
automation and demand-side forces through audience evaluations, the technological
forces of algorithmic bias represent the most immediate and pervasive threat to equity in
genAI systems. This bias can create self-reinforcing cycles of discrimination that, if left
unchecked, risk cementing existing social inequalities into our technological
infrastructure, particularly for communities whose historical narratives have been
systematically suppressed or misrepresented.
Recent research, however, reveals both the potential and limitations of these
technologies in landscape architecture and heritage conservation. In his article
“ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born ‘Knowledge’”(2023), Dirk H. R.
Spennemann examined genAI’s ability to discuss cultural heritage values and found
crucial limitations: while genAI can process and summarize information, it “lacks the
combined effects of enculturation and lived experience and thus cannot relate to and
contextualize the factual information it collates.”164 For example, while genAI-created
contents generally covered common cultural heritage values such as historic, aesthetic,
and social significance, it often exhibited hallucinations, including flawed logic or
inverted concepts, indicating a lack of deep understanding of the subject matter.165 This
finding becomes particularly disconcerting for APIA communities, already confronting
technological fetishization and cultural erasure, as hallucinations compound patterns of
stereotyping and everyday memoricide.
166
The influence of genAI on what we see, what we know, and how we act continues
to grow despite its relatively short history. Far from reaching its limits, genAI
164 Spennemann, “ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born ‘Knowledge’: How Does a Generative AI
Language Model Interpret Cultural Heritage Values?”
165 Spennemann, “ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born ‘Knowledge’: How Does a Generative AI
Language Model Interpret Cultural Heritage Values?”
166 Specifically, it evaluated the genAI's understanding of the topic and its ability to provide a nuanced
discussion. In the experiment, the author tasked ChatGPT with writing 1500-word essays on the subject
and analyzed 36 iterations of the resulting essays. This method was intended to test genAI's ability to
generate a longer exposition on a complex topic without additional guidance.

81
advancement shows no signs of slowing down. Over the past decade, key trends have
accelerated: investments in AI technology have surged despite occasional setbacks,167 and
processing efficiency has improved exponentially, even as computational demands
increase.168 Like other major technological breakthroughs, genAI brings both positive
and negative consequences. As genAI continues to develop and refine itself, its impact is
expected to expand even further. For instance, advancements in quantum computing
and “super AI” pose significant risks of widening existing digital divides. The
concentration of resources among major tech companies and wealthy nations could
further marginalize communities with limited access to education, training, and
resources. Additionally, the lack of diverse representation in development and complex
technical barriers also perpetuate existing biases while raising concerns about
hegemony, privacy, and everyday memoricide.169 Paradoxically, the familiarity and
ubiquity of these genAI applications may lead us to overlook their novelty and
underestimate the magnitude of changes still to come. It is imperative to remember that
we are still in the early stages of the “AI revolution,” and the most significant
transformations likely lie ahead.
COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
In exploring the potential of genAI across various domains, including heritage
conservation and landscape architecture, it remains crucial to center human agency in
genAI development and deployment. Leadership that prioritizes equity is essential to
167 Geoffrey Cheung, Federico Fabbri, and Clark O’Niell, “IT Spending Pulse: As GenAI Investment
Grows, Other IT Projects Get Squeezed,” BCG Global, July 2024,
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/it-spending-pulse-as-genAI-investment-grows-other-it-projectsget-squeezed. 168 Andrew R. Chow, “How AI Is Fueling a Boom in Data Centers and Energy Demand,” TIME, June
2024, https://time.com/6987773/ai-data-centers-energy-usage-climate-change/. (hereafter cited as Chow, AI
Demand)
169 Susan Galer, “SAP BrandVoice: If You Think AI Is Hot, Wait Until It Meets Quantum Computing,”
Forbes, March 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2023/03/21/if-you-think-ai-is-hot-wait-until-it-meetsquantum-computing/.

82
ensure that benefits of genAI are appropriately distributed throughout society. The
fields of conservation and preservation must be integral to ongoing discussions to
facilitate a genAI-augmented future that elevates all communities while preventing the
technology from amplifying existing societal inequities.
The Collective Intelligence Project (CIP), established by Saffron Huang and
Divya Siddarth, examines whether genAI can enhance our capacity to harness collective
intelligence.170 They believe that genAI and other AI technologies present opportunities
to forge stronger coordination and connections within networks of people addressing
large-scale common challenges, such as scientific research projects or complex dataset
management. By ensuring diverse teams are aware of collaborative progress, genAI can
catalyze and facilitate more efficient cooperation. CIP’s core premise holds that
collaboration yields superior outcomes when groups trust in collective wisdom and
problem-solving capabilities. Through partnership with Anthropic, CIP investigates
“how democratic processes can influence AI development” and explores methods to
make collective wisdom more accessible and effective across disciplines.171
CIP emphasizes that genAI foundation models, such as ChatGPT and Claude,
rely upon and contribute to the digital commons, defined as “a subset of the commons,
where the resources are data, information, culture and knowledge which are created
and/or maintained online.”172 However, implementing collective intelligence for digital
archives presents considerable challenges. Szoniecky’s “Collective Intelligence and
Digital Archives” illuminates the complexities of formalizing and modeling knowledge
in ways that balance accessibility and comprehensiveness.173 This challenge is
170 Introduction to the Collective Intelligence Project and the overview of their work can be found on their
website: https://www.cip.org/whitepaper
171 The Collective Intelligence Project, “CIP Whitepaper,” The Collective Intelligence Project, 2014,
https://www.cip.org/whitepaper.
172 Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay and Felix Stalder, “Digital Commons,” Internet Policy Review 9 (December
2020), https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530.
173 Samuel Szoniecky, Collective Intelligence and Digital Archives, ed. Nasreddine Bouhaï, 1st ed. (John
Wiley & Sons, 2017).

83
complicated by the need to acquire and integrate data from diverse sources, particularly
when negotiating between complexity of heritage objects, implicit knowledge of experts,
and formal languages used for digital representation.174 The varied approaches across
museums, libraries, and archaeological institutions further complicate harmonization
efforts.
These challenges notwithstanding, the ecosystem of collective intelligence and
digital commons holds particular relevance for the preservation of APIA heritage.
Effective application necessitates fostering collective intelligence through developing
ontologies and controlled vocabularies that accurately reflect the diverse cultures within
the APIA community. Additionally, it requires designing user engagement interfaces
that balance complexity and simplicity.175 Such efforts require sustained collaboration
with community leaders, cultural experts, and linguists to ensure that the structure,
content, and terminology of the digital archive are culturally appropriate, equitable,
accessible, and comprehensive.176
GenAI-driven collective intelligence could profoundly impact APIA heritage
preservation by reshaping narratives through the integration of diverse perspectives and
histories. This technology could enhance the discoverability of APIA cultural artifacts
and stories, enable more nuanced representations of APIA experiences, and support the
preservation of endangered APIA languages and traditions.177
174 Szoniecky, Collective Intelligence and Digital Archives. 175 Szoniecky, Collective Intelligence and Digital Archives. 176 Alex V Cipolle, “How Native Americans Are Trying to Debug A.I.’s Biases,” The New York Times,
March 2022, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/22/technology/ai-data-indigenous-ivow.html.
177 Further discussed in Chapter 3.

84
3) CHAPTER 3
This chapter will examine how genAI can assist in creating counter-memories
within the Asian Futurism framework, 178 focusing on its potential to amplify
marginalized voices and explore new paths for expression that respects APIA
perspectives, experiences, and knowledge systems. GenAI is a powerful tool for
reimagining Asian futures, but its implementation requires thoughtful consideration.
We must remain vigilant about technological determinism, which purports that
“technologies are the primary cause of major social and historical changes,”179 as this
belief can oversimplify the complex relationship between technology and cultural
change. Moreover, it is important to avoid the reduction of cultural identities to mere
aesthetic elements.180
This discussion naturally leads to the examination of techno-Orientalism—a
persistent pattern of Asian representation that reduces complex cultural identities to
technological stereotypes and exotic otherness.181 Understanding these tensions is crucial
as we work to ensure that AI-generated counter-memories serve as tools for authentic
cultural empowerment rather than vehicles for further marginalization.
Futurism movements emerging from marginalized communities serve as essential
frameworks for reimagining futures through multiracial, multiethnic perspectives that
challenge dominant narratives shaped by colonialism, imperialism, white supremacy,
and Eurocentrism. CoFuturist movements, including Afrofuturism, Indigenous
Futurisms, Latinx Futurisms, Asian Futurism, and Gulf/Middle Eastern Futurisms, offer
178 Also referred to as Asia Futurism, Asia futurism, Asiafuturism, or Asian-futurism; not to be confused
with techno-Orientalism or techno-orientalism.
179 Daniel Chandler and Rod Munday, Technological Determinism (Oxford University Press, 2011),
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199568758.001.0001/acref-9780199568758-e-2729. 180 David S. Roh, Betsy Huang, and Greta A. Niu, eds., Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia in Speculative
Fiction, History, and Media, 1st ed. (Rutgers University Press, 2015). 181 Dawn Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM,” Artforum, June 2016, https://www.artforum.com/columns/asiafuturism-229189/.

85
pathways to liberated futures that center the identities, experiences, histories, and
cultures of people of color and the Global South.182 These frameworks emphasize the
creation of counter-memories—decolonized narratives, identities, and histories free from
colonialist and imperialist influence.
These considerations help frame the broader examination of how genAI can
support equitable cultural expression, defined not just by equal access to technology, but
by APIA communities’ ability to shape how these tools are developed and deployed in
service of their own cultural reclamation and future-making. While genAI offers
unprecedented processing capabilities to enhance and amplify these counter-memories,
this potential cannot be realized without first addressing the foundational models’
training data and encoded biases. A crucial first step is for marginalized communities to
reclaim agency and autonomy over their data, including cultural artifacts, historical
narratives, spiritual practices, and collective memories. Ensuring data sovereignty and
incorporating CoFuturist frameworks into the training of AI foundation models are
necessary measures to enhance genAI’s potential as an effective tool for supporting
APIAs to create and distribute culturally informed counter-memories that challenge
dominant narratives.
ASIAN FUTURISM
Asian Futurism emerged as both a response to techno-Orientalism—a
contemporary rebranding of traditional Orientalist stereotypes that specifically
associates Asian people and cultures with technology, often in dehumanizing ways—and
an independent artistic and philosophical movement exploring possible futures through
Asian cultural perspectives.183 As Dawn Chan wrote in the 2016 article, “Asia-Futurism,”
the question—“Is it possible to be othered across time?”—has become increasingly
relevant, as Asian-inflected visions of the future have subverted global imaginations for
182 Taylor et al., The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms, 1–7.
183 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”

86
nearly a century.184 While these visions have traditionally manifested in stereotypical
tableaux of hyper-technological Asian cities, from neon-lit streetscapes to cyborg
narratives, understanding both techno-Orientalism and Asian Futurism is crucial for
reclaiming APIA identity and creating counter-memories that genuinely resonate with
APIA communities.185
For APIAs, Asian Futurism represents more than a theoretical paradigm—it
provides a vital framework for reclaiming cultural heritage and narratives while
envisioning futures beyond Western assimilation. Bringing Asian Futurism into heritage
conservation and counter-memory formation means not only preserving tangible
artifacts, oral traditions, and cultural landscapes, but also reconceptualizing how these
elements might evolve in future societies. Works like Subash Thebe Limbu’s Ningwasum
(2021) demonstrate this by envisioning a future where Indigenous peoples maintain
sovereignty over their native lands while advancing technologically.186 As Adeline Chia
notes in “What’s next for Asian Futurism?” (2024), this raises another question: “How do
we connect the coordinates of our past to orientate ourselves in the present and look
towards the future?”187
Through counter-memories and speculative imagination, Asian Futurism invites
APIA creators and communities to explore how traditional knowledge systems and
cultural practices can evolve alongside technological advancement without being
subsumed by Western paradigms.188 While genAI is one of many tools available for the
reclamation work, its unique processing capabilities offer APIA creators new
possibilities for developing and distributing counter-memories, especially when
184 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.” 185 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.” 186 Tate Modern, “Subash Thebe Limbu: Ningwasum | Tate Modern,” Tate, March 2023,
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/subash-thebe-limbu-ningwasum.
187 Adeline Chia, “What’s Next for ‘Asian Futurism’?,” Artreview.com, October 2024,
https://artreview.com/a-gathering-of-tomorrow-starch-singapore-review-adeline-chia/. 188 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”

87
developed with cultural sensitivity and awareness. From AI-assisted artwork that
thoughtfully integrates traditional motifs with futuristic elements to interactive digital
experiences that help preserve oral histories and cultural practices, genAI can support
APIA communities in their ongoing work of cultural preservation and future-building
through the creation of counter-memories. This approach acknowledges that heritage
conservation need not conflict with technological progress—instead, it suggests that
cultural reclamation and evolution can incorporate both heritage and innovation in
ways that meet the needs and aspirations of APIA communities. The key lies in ensuring
these tools and methodologies serve community-driven narratives rather than
attempting to generate “authentic” cultural content independently.
Fig. 3.1: A collection of urban artworks by Xeme. (Images from “Welcome to the Bustle of Kowloon,” Soi
Books, 2023, Accessed July 3, 2024, https://www.soibooks.com/journal/welcome-to-the-bustle-of-kowloon).
Examples demonstrating the artist’s versatility across different mediums, including spray paint for graffiti,
tattoo, photography, and digital tools. Xeme’s works capture the vibrant energy and cultural diversity of
Kowloon.
Xeme’s graffiti art, featured in the 2023 web post “Exploring Asian Futurism,”
demonstrates how Asian Futurism operates as a framework for cultural reclamation and
reimagining. His publication Kowloon Bustle, a collection of photographs documenting
the Hong Kong street art and graffiti scene, captures the fusion of traditional Chinese

88
and “Old Hong Kong” urban imagery with futuristic elements.189 By creating a distinctly
Asian vision of the future, Xeme, Chip7, and other Asian and APIA creators exemplify
how vernacular forms of expression can maintain a strong connection to cultural
heritage while imagining new possibilities. GenAI can enhance the analysis, creation,
and distribution of such artistic expressions, supporting APIA creators as they expand
counter-memories that deconstruct techno-Orientalist depictions and reclaim their place
in defining APIA futures beyond their historical reduction to exotic backdrops for
Western protagonists.
Fig. 3.2: A selection of artworks by Chip7. (images from “Chip7”, Stickerbombworld, Accessed July 2, 2024,
https://www.stickerbombworld.com/products/chip7-bangkok-thailand). Chip7, a renowned graffiti artist
and founding member of the legendary American crew MAYHEM. As a notable figure in “The History of
American Graffiti,” Chip7’s influence on street art and graffiti is undeniable. His recent work, inspired by
his Thai and Southeast Asian ancestral roots and Hindu epic stories like the Mahabharata and Ramayana,
brings a unique and captivating perspective to his innovative style. Chip7’s work transports viewers to the
vibrant streets of Bangkok, Thailand, offering fresh insights into the cities, towns, and countries that
inspire his incredible artwork.
COUNTER-MEMORY THROUGH ASIAN FUTURISM
Asian Futurism, a cultural, artistic, and philosophical movement, provides a
framework through which APIAs can reclaim their narratives and reimagine them
through their own cultural perspectives. The movement serves dual purposes: as a
189 Soi Books, “Welcome To The Bustle Of Kowloon,” Soi Books, January 2023,
https://www.soibooks.com/journal/welcome-to-the-bustle-of-kowloon.

89
response to techno-Orientalism and as a platform for heritage reclamation and futuremaking.190 It accomplishes this by integrating traditional Asian cultural elements,
philosophies, and ways of knowing with futuristic and technological concepts, thereby
challenging Western-centric narratives about technology, progress, and modernity.191
In Asian Futurism, genAI emerges as a critical instrument for crafting these
counter-memories. The technology’s ability to process vast amounts of cultural data
while generating novel content offers unprecedented opportunities for reimagining
APIA experiences and futures beyond Western paradigms of representation.192 This
technological capacity enables APIA creators to experiment with narrative forms that
challenge established histories while constructing empowering visions of APIA identity
that transcend traditional East/West, immigrant/native-born, or past/future binaries.193
The formation of counter-memories is a vital aspect of Asian Futurism’s role in
helping APIA communities process and reframe intergenerational experiences, such as
colonialism, war, and displacement.194 By creating narratives that challenge dominant
Western historic accounts and future visions, Asian Futurism provides a platform for
alternative storytelling. Films like Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022), written and
directed by Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert, illustrate this approach by reimagining
multiverse theory through the lens of a Chinese American immigrant laundromat owner
being audited by the Internal Revenue Service.195 Similarly, writers like Ken Liu,
190 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”
191 Lily W. Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism,” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 9 (March 2023): 109–33, https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2023.0005.
192 Audra Mitchell and Aadita Chaudhury, “Worlding beyond ‘the’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic
Visions and BIPOC Futurisms,” International Relations 34 (August 2020): 309–32,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820948936.
193 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”
194 Verónica Tello, “Counter-Memory and and–and: Aesthetics and Temporalities for Living Together,”
Memory Studies 15 (October 2019): 175069801987600, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698019876002.
195 A24, “Everything Everywhere All At Once,” a24films.com, 2022, https://a24films.com/films/everythingeverywhere-all-at-once.

90
renowned for the Dandelion Dynasty series and his translation of The Three-Body
Problem, integrate Asian mythology and science fiction to create new narrative
possibilities.196
GenAI can enhance these creative processes by helping APIA creators explore
combinations of cultural intersections while maintaining authentic immigrant
experiences. For instance, in multiverse narratives, the structure of these stories can be
experimented with using genAI to explore variations that weave together concepts like
yin-yang duality, nonlinear temporality, or Buddhist notions of interconnectedness and
interdependence with contemporary APIA experiences. This approach enables creators
to discover unexpected narrative connections that resonate with both cultural
authenticity and speculative possibility. Ken Liu’s creation of “silkpunk” demonstrates
this integration through a distinctive literary genre (or style) that aims to decolonize
science fiction and fantasy tropes while creating a new “cosmonarratology”—a
cosmopolitan style of writing that breaks down traditional narrative boundaries.197
Unlike steampunk’s problematic nostalgia for an era of Western imperial expansion and
Victorian technological supremacy, silkpunk centers East Asian philosophical and
technological traditions in ways that challenge Eurocentric speculations and
assumptions.198 As Veronica Tello in “Counter-memory and and–and: Aesthetics and
temporalities for living together” (2019) argues, this approach describes a “totally
different form of time” that offers an alternative to Western-centric modernity.199
196 Emily Xueni Jin, “What Is ‘Silkpunk’?,” #SixthTone, November 2022,
https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1011617.
197 Jin, “What Is ‘Silkpunk’?”
198 Susana Loza, Speculative Imperialisms: Monstrosity and Masquerade in Postracial Times, 1st ed.
(Lexington Books, 2017), 47–59,
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hampshire/detail.action?docID=5178662.
199 Tello, “Counter-Memory and and–and: Aesthetics and Temporalities for Living Together.”

91
Fig. 3.3: (left) Silkpunk airship illustration. (Francesca Myman, artwork for “Ken Liu: Silkpunk,” Locus
Magazine, May 2015, https://locusmag.com/2015/05/ken-liu-silkpunk/). Myman’s interpretation of silkpunk
airships demonstrates the unique aesthetic of Liu’s world-building.
Fig. 3.4: (right) The Veiled Throne cover art. (Sam Weber [artist] and Michael McCartney [art design],
cover artwork for The Veiled Throne by Ken Liu, 2021, Gallery/Saga Press).
Asian Futurism transcends conventional science fiction by integrating cultural
heritage and ethnic identity to offer alternate visions of tomorrow while confronting the
complex intersections of race, technology, and power in today’s sociopolitical
landscape.200 Author Ken Liu’s silkpunk blends diverse literary traditions, from classical
Western epics like Beowulf to Chinese works like Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio,
creating new possibilities for counter-memories.201 Rather than superficially
incorporating Asian cultural elements, this approach represents a deeper reimagining of
storytelling that creates something neither purely Chinese/Asian nor American/Western,
200 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.” 201 Jin, “What Is ‘Silkpunk’?”

92
but rather what a “kaleidoscope of vibrant, varicolored myths” that has the potential to
reshape the future of speculative fiction.202
GenAI’s processing capabilities can support this complex world-building through
management of vast archives ranging from Asian historic documents and folklore to
emerging technologies, helping APIA storytellers generate counter-memories that
maintain cultural legitimacy while pushing creative possibilities. For instance, during
the ideation phase, genAI could assist authors in reimagining ancient innovations like
the lodestone compass within alternative historic frameworks or help conceptualize new
mythological beings that combine elements from various Asian cultural traditions while
preserving their cultural significance and symbolic meaning.
The key advantage of incorporating genAI in these contexts lies in its ability to
analyze, process, and combine various elements at scale while being guided by humans
who understand the nuances and significance of these elements. This collaboration
between human creators and genAI opens new possibilities for expressing cultural
futures through counter-memories. The resulting human-AI hybrid forms move beyond
mere linguistic innovation, creating new modes of cultural expression and imagination.
Through this hybrid approach, APIA creators can develop narratives that
convincingly code-switch between different languages, dialects, and cultural settings
while accurately referencing social cues, or produce terminologies that combine
traditional concepts with futuristic elements. These human-AI hybrid forms represent
not just linguistic innovation but new ways of imagining and expressing cultural futures
that creators use to develop narratives that transcend conventional genre boundaries—
whether in silkpunk’s reimagining of Asian futures, climate fiction’s (cli-fi) exploration
of traditional Polynesian wisdom with speculative scenarios about sea level rise, or
202 Jin, “What Is ‘Silkpunk’?”

93
broader Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) futurism’s visions of a
decolonial world.
Counter-memories in Asian Futurism manifest through various forms of cultural
production, from speculative fiction and digital art to experimental film and mixedmedia installations. These works actively resist techno-Orientalist tropes while
reclaiming technological narratives through an Asian or APIA cultural lens.203 Notable
examples include Ted Chiang’s 1998 novella Story of Your Life, adapted into the film
Arrival (2016), which incorporates Eastern philosophical notions of time and language
while questioning linear perceptions of these concepts.204 Similarly, Saya Woolfalk
demonstrates Asian Futurism’s potential through immersive installations that blend
Asian aesthetics with biotechnology.205 Her 2021 installation, Field Notes from the
Empathic Universe, creates hybrid worlds through her fictional “Empathics”—beings who
can time travel and shapeshift across the multiverse—to enable radical reimaginings of
identity, culture, and belonging beyond Western frameworks.206
However, as Lily Luo points out in her 2023 article, “Intimacies of the Future:
Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and Afrofuturism,” Asian
Futurism must grapple with questions of power and domination.207 While Asian
Futurism aims to challenge Western hegemony, it must be careful not to simply replace
one form of cultural dominance with another. This tension is evident in contemporary
Chinese futurism through concepts like “Tian-Xia” (All-under-Heaven), which presents
203 Roh, Huang, and Niu, Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia in Speculative Fiction, History, and Media. 204 Avery Keatley, “Writer Ted Chiang on AI and Grappling with Big Ideas,” TPR: The Public’s Radio,
December 2024, https://thepublicsradio.org/npr/writer-ted-chiang-on-ai-and-grappling-with-big-ideas/.
205 Saya Woolfalk, Field Notes from the Emphatic Universe, SAYA WOOLFALK, 2021,
https://www.sayawoolfalk.com/field-notes-from-the-empathic-universe.
206 The Newark Museum of Art, Saya Woolfalk: Field Notes from the Empathic Universe,
Newarkmuseumart.org, 2021, https://newarkmuseumart.org/exhibition/woolfalk-universe/.
207 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”

94
an alternative to Western liberal world order but risks replicating similar dynamics of
cultural and political dominance.208
Historically, Tian-Xia justified Chinese imperial dominance over neighboring
states through a hierarchical system that positioned China at the center. In its modern
interpretation and application, while purporting to offer a more equitable global order,
it still risks centering Chinese cultural and political power at the expense of other Asian
perspectives and experiences. This dynamic parallels how Western liberalism claimed
universality while inherently privileging Western values and systems of power.209
This hierarchical dynamic manifests not only in Asia but also within APIA
communities. In her Netflix special Baby Cobra, Ali Wong satirizes these internal
divisions by distinguishing between “Fancy Asians” (East Asians) and “Jungle Asians”
(Southeast Asians and others), exposing how APIA communities arbitrarily classify
themselves into hierarchies based on seemingly unrelated factors such as socioeconomic
status, culinary preferences, and skin tone.210 This tension is also evident in
contemporary Asian popular cultural movements like Hallyu (한류), the Korean
entertainment wave known as K-pop, and Japanese aesthetic concepts of wabi (侘び),
sabi (寂び), and yūgen (幽玄).211 While these East Asian cultural products help challenge
Western media dominance, they can simultaneously marginalize other Asian voices and
perspectives, particularly those from smaller or less economically powerful nations.212
208 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”
209 Mitchell and Chaudhury, “Worlding beyond ‘the’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic Visions and
BIPOC Futurisms,” 310.
210 Netflix Is A Joke, 15 Minutes of Ali Wong, YouTube, March 31, 2021,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxxLmgleW1s.
211 wabi means minimal or simple beauty, sabi means rustic, patina, or aged with experience, and yūgen
means deep or mysterious grace.
212 Vincenzo Cicchelli and Sylvie Octobre, The Sociology of Hallyu Pop Culture: Surfing the Korean Wave,
1st ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84296-3.

95
This creates a layered power dynamic where resistance to Western hegemony coexists
with intra-Asian cultural hierarchies, both globally and within diaspora communities.213
A major challenge for Asian Futurism thus becomes imagining futures that truly
decenter hierarchical power structures rather than simply shifting the center of power.214
In this context, genAI can help create counter-memories that challenge dominant
narratives, but it must be guided by diverse APIA perspectives to avoid perpetuating
Western standards, hierarchies, or engaging in cultural appropriation, whether
intentional or not. This necessitates thoughtful consideration of how different Asian and
APIA perspectives and experiences can be represented without recreating systems of
dominance and subordination. Human-AI collaboration in developing countermemories offers a potential pathway for communities to process and reframe their
experiences while working toward more equitable forms of cultural expression and
representation. As Asian Futurism evolves, it must continue to question and challenge
both external and internal power dynamics, using technological tools like genAI in
service of broader goals of cultural reclamation and empowerment.
The significance of Asian Futurism extends beyond increased representation to
its ability to imagine radically different futures while maintaining cultural specificity. It
demonstrates how communities can process historic trauma and preserve cultural
memory while creating new possibilities that are not constrained by either Western
hegemony or an uncritical adherence to tradition. This allows APIA communities to
envision futures that maintain connections to heritage while engaging with
contemporary contexts on their own terms. Through creative works across various
media, Asian Futurism shows how heritage reclamation and counter-memory formation
are not merely exercises in retrospection but crucial tools for imagining and creating
213 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”
214 Mitchell and Chaudhury, “Worlding beyond ‘the’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic Visions and
BIPOC Futurisms.”

96
possibilities for the future—ones that center APIA experiences and perspectives while
embracing hybridity and transformation.
Fig. 3.5: New Port City skyline from Ghost in the Shell. (Screenshot from Ghost in the Shell, Paramount
Pictures, 2017. Published in Jordan Zakarin, “How the ‘Ghost in the Shell’ Movie Changed from the
Original,” Inverse, March 27, 2017, https://www.inverse.com/article/29570-ghost-in-the-shell-changes-fromthe-anime-design-holograms). The futuristic cityscape of New Port City displays the film’s interpretation
of the original anime’s neo-noir aesthetic.
TECHNO-ORIENTALSIM
In contrast to Asian Futurism’s empowering vision, techno-Orientalism, a term
coined by David Robins and Kevin Morley in 1995, perpetuates narratives where Asians
are depicted as hyper-technological yet culturally static, reinforcing white dominant,
colonial, and exclusionary visions of the future.215 The concept describes “the
phenomenon of imagining Asia and Asians in hypo- or hypertechnological terms in
cultural productions and political discourse […] infused with the languages and codes of
the technological and the futuristic.”216 This Western lens of viewing Asia emerged
215 Anna Maitland, “After Yang – Confluence,” Nyu.edu, March 2023,
https://confluence.gallatin.nyu.edu/context/interdisciplinary-seminar/after-yang.
216 Roh, Huang, and Niu, Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia in Speculative Fiction, History, and Media, 2.

97
partly in response to and was driven by the growing exchange of capital and trade
between East Asia-Western trade relations and partly from xenophobic tendencies
regarding East Asian technological dominance.217
The relationship between Asian Futurism and techno-Orientalism represents a
complex dynamic of resistance and reclamation, where Asian Futurism emerged to
counter and transcend the reductive narratives perpetuated by techno-Orientalism.218
Dawn Chan’s 2023 article “Asia-Futurism” provides a crucial examination of futurist
narratives created outside the APIA community. Chan juxtaposes Asia[n]-Futurism with
techno-Orientalism, analyzing how visions of technologically advanced Asian cities have
become deeply embedded in the global imagination. Techno-Orientalism, evident in
works like the Blade Runner and The Matrix franchises, reflects Western anxieties about
Asia’s technological and economic rise while simultaneously erasing actual Asian
characters and perspectives. In contrast, Asian Futurism provides frameworks for APIAs
to imagine futures and create counter-memories that genuinely center Asian and APIA
experiences, identities, and culture.
Drawing on scholars like Jean Baudrillard, David Morley, and Kevin Robins,
Chan demonstrates how Western anxieties about Asian technological advancement have
led to exoticized and othered representations of Asian futures, mirroring the “anxieties
that drove the historical violence of colonialism, racism, and exclusion.”219 From history
and art to video games, film, television, music, and literature, the use of Asian aesthetics
and symbolism in dystopian futuristic settings has become normalized in the
mainstream discourse. These representations have evolved from focusing on Japan’s
technological dominance in the 1980s to broader concerns about global capitalism’s
effects on various Asian countries, rooted in fears of Western loss of hegemony or
217 Yu, “AI: ‘Asian Intelligence.’”
218 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”
219 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”

98
authority over the East.220 Contemporary media, particularly Hollywood, manifests these
futuristic Asian stereotypes by often casting Asian actors in science fiction and fantasy
roles as mere tropes—ancient/foreign, sly/mysterious, static/timeless,
impersonal/simulacra—thereby reinforcing the idea that Asians belong in the future or
alternate realities rather than the present.221
These fictional representations have real-world consequences, as demonstrated
during the COVID-19 pandemic when rhetoric like “China virus” led to increased
violence against APIA communities across the U.S.222 The situation was exacerbated by
unfounded theories circulated through news outlets claiming COVID-19 was engineered
as a biological weapon in Chinese laboratories like the Wuhan Institute of Virology223—
narratives that read like science fiction plots but continue to cause tangible, real-world
harm to APIA communities. 224 While techno-Orientalism portrays Asians as
technological threats, reinforcing “Yellow Peril” narratives that frame East Asian
technological and economic advancement as inherently dangerous to Western society,225
Asian Futurism seeks to reimagine these technological elements by employing countermemories. This persistent conflation of Asian or APIA identity with threatening
technology—whether through stereotypes about hordes of robotic factory workers,
conspiracies about bioweapons, or political discourse about growing economic
competition—has historically justified anti-Asian sentiment and violence, grounded in
reality or not, revealing why counter-memories through the Asian Futurist paradigm are
220 Roh, Huang, and Niu, Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia in Speculative Fiction, History, and Media. 221 Berkeley Art Center, “Virtually Asian by Astria Suparak,” Vimeo, January 23, 2021,
https://vimeo.com/503911877.
222 Nakamura, “With ‘Kung Flu,’ Trump Sparks Backlash over Racist Language — and a Rallying Cry for
Supporters.”
223 BBC, “Covid Origin: Why the Wuhan Lab-Leak Theory Is Being Taken Seriously,” BBC News, March
1, 2021, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-57268111.
224 Michaeleen Doucleff, “What Does the Science Say about the Origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?,”
NPR, February 28, 2023, https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/28/1160162845/what-does-thescience-say-about-the-origin-of-the-sars-cov-2-pandemic.
225 Maitland, “After Yang – Confluence.”

99
vital for challenging how these harmful narratives move beyond fiction to shape realworld attitudes and actions.226
Fig. 3.6: Comparison study of qipao in films. (Astria Suparak, Asian Futures, Without Asians,
exhibition/presentation for ICA LA and GYOPO, August 2021, https://astriasuparak.com/2021/06/28/asianfutures-without-asians_presentation/). Different representation demonstrates how traditional Chinese
dress has been appropriated and reimagined in futuristic media narratives about Asia.
Astria Suparak’s video essay Virtually Asian (2021) critically examines Hollywood’s
paradoxical relationship with Asian representation: an appetite for Asian aesthetics and
bodies coupled with a reluctance to cast Asian actors in leading roles.227 Through
analysis of American science fiction films like Blade Runner, Ghost in the Shell, and Star
Wars, Suparak demonstrates how even in science fiction—a genre of limitless
possibilities—persistent stereotypes and racist tropes about Asian and APIA culture
continue to dominate. These representations not only reflect prejudices but actively
226 Michael Martina, “Rubio Pick Signals a Trump China Policy That Could Go beyond Tariffs,” Reuters,
November 14, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/world/us/rubio-pick-signals-trump-china-policy-that-couldgo-beyond-tariffs-2024-11-14/.
227 Astria Suparak, “ASIAN FUTURES, WITHOUT ASIANS Presentation,” Astria Suparak, June 28, 2021,
https://astriasuparak.com/2021/06/28/asian-futures-without-asians_presentation/.

100
shape APIA communities’ cultural perception of self and formation of identity.228
Understanding techno-Orientalism’s pervasive influence is therefore crucial for
surfacing counter-memories, as it enables APIA communities to identify and actively
resist these reductive tropes while cultivating narratives that genuinely reflect their
diverse experiences, cultures, and aspirations.
Drawing from Chan’s discussion of Asian Futurism’s relationship to
Afrofuturism, this framework creates space for hybrid cultural formations by rejecting
both uncritical Westernization and rigid traditionalism while maintaining cultural
specificity.229 Through this approach, APIA communities can develop counter-memories
that honor cultural heritage while actively participating in shaping modern
technological and cultural landscapes.230 The actualization of counter-memories through
the paradigm of Asian Futurism facilitates dynamic cultural expression that neither
abandons tradition nor remains fixed in the past, but rather generates new possibilities
for cultural evolution and identity formation.231
This cyclical relationship between representation and identity formation, driven
by Hollywood’s myopic understanding of the intersectionality of identity, technology,
and future narratives, requires disruption to address ongoing issues of cultural
appropriation. By harnessing both critique and creation, APIA communities are
beginning to use genAI to generate and refine counter-memories that challenge these
reductive narratives while asserting control over their own cultural representation and
future imaginings. As Theadora Walsh contends in the 2021 article “Astria Suparak’s
‘Virtually Asian’ Analyzes Sci-Fi to Argue for Less Racist Futures,” this process of
228 Theadora Walsh, “Astria Suparak’s ‘Virtually Asian’ Analyzes Sci-Fi to Argue for Less Racist Futures,”
KQED, March 2021, https://www.kqed.org/arts/13893493/astria-suparaks-virtually-asian-analyzes-sci-fi-toargue-for-less-racist-futures.
229 Eva Ulrike Pirker and Judith Rahn, “Afrofuturist Trajectories across Time, Space and Media,” Critical
Studies in Media Communication 37 (September 2020): 283–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1820542.
230 Mitchell and Chaudhury, “Worlding beyond ‘the’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic Visions and
BIPOC Futurisms.”
231 Pirker and Rahn, “Afrofuturist Trajectories across Time, Space and Media.”

101
reclamation using counter-memories becomes essential for imagining and creating less
racist futures that genuinely reflect APIA experiences and aspirations.
Fig. 3.7: Major Kusanagi, portrayed by Scarlett Johansson in Ghost in the Shell. (Screenshot from
promotional video, Paramount Pictures, 2017. Published in Jordan Zakarin, “How the ‘Ghost in the Shell’
Movie Changed from the Original,” Inverse, March 27, 2017, https://www.inverse.com/article/29570-ghostin-the-shell-changes-from-the-anime-design-holograms). The live-action adaptation’s casting choice
exemplifies the whitewashing practices discussed in Suparak’s analysis, where the Japanese protagonist
Major Kusanagi was reinterpreted through a white actor.
CREATING “GROUNDEDNESS” USING GENAI
Counter-memories and Asian Futurism work together to challenge dominant
Western hegemonic narratives and future visions by: (1) reclaiming agency over how
Asian and APIA cultures and histories are represented; (2) processing historic
experiences and lasting impacts of colonialism, imperialism, and systemic oppression;
(3) creating frameworks for imagining decolonial futures that center Asian and APIA
perspectives; and (4) resisting both uncritical Westernization and rigid traditionalism.
APIA communities face complex challenges of diaspora and displacement within
Asian Futurism. As Chan points out, these communities grapple with a particular
challenge of “sitelessness” and the phrase “go home,” which she attributes to “a partial
inheritance of a history of immigration bans, internment camps, and indentured

102
servitude in America’s not-so-distant past.”232 The result is a disconnect between the
reparative potential of counter-memories and the geographic displacement of APIA
communities, as their construction of identity and futuristic visions often lacks the
geographical groundedness available to Asia-based artists.233
Fig. 3.8: East vs. West. (Gajin Fujita, 2010, mixed media [spray paint, paint marker, Mean Streak paint stick,
gold, white gold and platinum leaf] on wood panel, 84 × 264 inches [twelve 84 × 22-inch panels], private
collection. L.A. Louver Gallery, https://lalouver.com/exhibition.cfm?tExhibition_id=675).
This tension becomes evident in Western hegemonic narratives, particularly in
literature and media representation, where Asian and APIA characters are frequently
confined to science fiction and fantasy settings—present in imagined futures but notably
absent from contemporary narratives.234 The enduring impact rooted in the notion of
sitelessness highlights why counter-memory formation becomes necessary for diaspora
communities. By creating narratives that bridge past trauma with future possibilities,
Asian Futurism helps APIA communities process histories of displacement while
imagining futures where their presence and contributions are fully recognized and
valued. This process of memory-making and future-imagining serves as a form of
232 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”
233 Chan, “ASIA-FUTURISM.”
234 Städelschule, “Xin Wang: Uncharting Asian Futurisms,” Vimeo, February 25, 2021,
https://vimeo.com/516661955.

103
cultural anchoring, helping communities establish belonging despite historical and
ongoing displacement. Through such cultural anchoring, APIA communities can fully
inhabit both physical and cultural spaces.
In considering how this framework relates to Asian Futurism and contemporary
Los Angeles, the city’s unique position as a diverse, cosmopolitan hub enables similar
kinds of organic cross-cultural exchange and hybrid identity formation. Los Angeles’
large APIA population, alongside other communities of color, creates opportunities for
artistic and cultural dialogue independent of hegemonic narratives about identity,
culture, and experience.
Fig. 3.9: (top left) Home Field LA. (Gajin Fujita, 2020, mixed media [24k gold leaf, 12k white gold leaf, spray
paint, acrylics, paint markers, Sakura streaks] on three wood panels, 72 × 60 inches overall, private
collection. L.A. Louver Gallery, https://lalouver.com/exhibition.cfm?tExhibition_id=2165).
Fig. 3.10: (bottom left) Gajin Fujita in his studio. (Photographer uncredited, 2020, L.A. Louver Gallery,
https://jaccc.org/art-new-normal/gajin-fujita/).
Fig. 3.11: (right) #WTF. (Gajin Fujita, 2020, mixed media [12k white gold leaf, 24k gold leaf, spray paint,
metal head markers, glitter, paint markers] on wood panel, 24 × 16 inches, private collection. L.A. Louver
Gallery, https://lalouver.com/exhibition.cfm?tExhibition_id=2165).

104
Joan Kee’s 2023 article, “Why Afro Asia,” provides poignant insights into how
inter-ethnic artistic exchanges and collaborations can help construct counter-memories
that challenge Western hegemonic frameworks. The idea of “Afro-Asia” illustrates how
artistic connections between African and Asian creators naturally emerged through
shared experiences of colonialism, cultural exchange, and resistance to Western
dominance.
This idea suggests possibilities for merging traditional artistic practices and
emerging technologies like genAI to document and amplify counter-memories,
particularly those calling attention to the legacies of connections between communities
of color. In doing so, it provides tools for resisting memoricide—the erasure of important
intercultural histories and cross-racial relationships.235 Kee’s emphasis on organic,
bottom-up cultural exchange rather than top-down institutional frameworks provides a
useful model for reflecting on how contemporary APIA communities might approach
identity formation and cultural production.236 This approach allows for expressions of
hybrid identities that emerge from lived experiences and community interactions, rather
than from fixed categories or expectations.
Los Angeles exemplifies this dynamic through its diverse neighborhoods—from
affluent areas to working-class ethnic enclaves—where communities continuously
influence and inspire each other across socioeconomic divisions. The city’s vibrant hiphop music and dance scenes have long served as spaces where artists from all
backgrounds collaborate and influence each other.237 Similarly, Koreatown’s distinctive
“all-you-can-eat” BBQ culture, particularly LA Galbi (LA 갈비), emerged from Korean
and American cultural exchange around butchering and meat preparation techniques.238
235 Joan Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” October 186 (2023): 137–62, https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00502.
236 Kee, “Why Afro Asia.”
237 Culture Shock, “Culture Shock LA,” Culture Shock LA, updated 2024,
https://www.cultureshockla.org/about.
238 Maangchi, “LA Galbi (LA Style Grilled Beef Short Ribs) Recipe by Maangchi,” Maangchi, June 20,
2010, https://www.maangchi.com/recipe/la-galbi.

105
Creative collectives like Wong Fu Productions have used digital media to explore and
document these complex community interactions, as seen in their parody video “Asian
Superstitions” (2020), which humorously unpacks various Asian superstitions and taboos
through a Halloween lens.239
The experience of “sitelessness” that Chan identifies in APIA communities—
rooted in histories of marginalization and oppression—could find new forms of
expression and reclamation. GenAI-assisted tools could help storytellers explore themes
of diaspora, belonging, and hybrid identity through generative poetry, visual art, and
multimedia storytelling. Projects like Wong Fu Productions’ “Asian Superstitions”
demonstrate how digital media can unpack complex cultural dynamics through an APIA
lens. GenAI could facilitate the creation of narratives that bridge past experiences of
marginalization with visions of future agency and recognition. Digital preservation and
amplification of vernacular forms of expression, like graffiti, murals, and other street art,
can serve as ways for APIA communities to claim space and document their presence.
Just as Los Angeles’ vibrant hip hop and culinary scenes emerged from cultural
exchange across communities, the graffiti and the street art movements represent
organic forms of placemaking, identity formation, and placekeeping240—community-led
preservation of both physical spaces and cultural heritage—in urban spaces. GenAI tools
could help document, preserve, and reimagine these ephemeral art forms while
connecting them to deeper histories of displacement and belonging.241 For example,
genAI could map historic patterns of displacement alongside the evolution of street art
styles or generate new hybrid visual forms that blend multicultural, multiethnic motifs
239 Wong Fu Productions, “Asian Superstitions (Ft. Alan Chikin Chow),” YouTube, October 30, 2020,
https://youtu.be/HuoWxYC0dYk.
240 U. S. Department of Arts and Culture, “Creative Placemaking, Placekeeping, and Cultural Strategies to
Resist Displacement,” U.S. Department of Arts and Culture, published March 2016,
https://usdac.us/blogac/2017/12/11/creative-placemaking-placekeeping-and-cultural-strategies-to-resistdisplacement.
241 Francesco Armetta et al., “Chemistry of Street Art: Neural Network for the Spectral Analysis of Berlin
Wall Colors,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, (December 2024), https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c12611.

106
with contemporary Los Angeles urban aesthetics.242 This merging of genAI with
grassroots creative practices could help APIA communities process historical trauma
while making their mark on urban spaces from which they have been historically
excluded.
Fig. 3.12: A photograph of Dana Davenport with her exhibition Dana's Beauty Supply. (Published on
Dana's Beauty Supply website, 2022, https://www.danasbeautysupply.com/). A photograph of the artist and
the exhibition that illustrates her artistic exploration of beauty supply store aesthetics and culture through
a biracial, intersectional lens that examines Korean American and Black American relationships within
these commercial spaces.
Similar to how Kogi243 trucks redefined Los Angeles cuisine through their
Mexican-Korean street tacos (initially served only from food trucks) and how Dana
Davenport, a Black-Korean American artist, explored the complex relationships between
Black and Asian communities through Korean-owned beauty supply stores selling Black
242 While genAI tools are relatively new with few documented case studies in street art preservation, the
recent Berlin Wall graffiti art analysis using neural networks demonstrates how AI approaches could be
adapted for documenting APIA street art in Los Angeles. The SAPNet methodology for analyzing street
art materials could provide a technical framework for digitally preserving vernacular artistic expressions of
APIA communities across LA's neighborhoods. (Francesco Armetta et al., 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c12611.)
243 Kogi, “About Kogi,” Kogi BBQ Taco Truck & Catering, 2024, https://kogibbq.com/about-kogi/.

107
haircare products,244 various hybrid cultural forms have challenged Western hegemony.
In this vein, genAI could help artists blend APIA styles with vernacular forms to address
themes of displacement and belonging. AI-assisted tools could document and expand
these organic forms of cultural fusion, helping APIA communities transform
“sitelessness” into new forms of belonging through digital space-making and creative
expression.
These diverse experiences and interactions remind us that no community exists
in isolation. Our cultural expressions, artistic practices, and identities are inherently
shaped by our interconnections, creating new forms of expression that transcend
traditional boundaries while acknowledging their diverse origins. This rich complexity
of interconnected experiences underscores why APIA and other marginalized
communities must actively document, preserve, and reclaim their histories, data, and
memories. Without such self-documentation and preservation efforts, these nuanced
narratives continually risk being oversimplified or erased by dominant historical
frameworks that often fail to capture the full depth of cross-cultural exchange and
community interconnection.
AFRO-ASIAN INTERSECTIONALITY
In “Intimacies of the Future,” Lily W. Luo explores the intersection of racial
politics, speculative fiction, and international relations theory to emphasize the
importance of diverse futuristic visions in understanding and shaping global relations.
Luo positions Afrofuturism as a radical reimagining of global futures that centers Black
experiences and imaginations, while emphasizing its role in challenging Western liberal
philosophy’s linear progress narratives.245 By combining Lisa Lowe’s framework of
244 Dana’s Beauty Supply, “Dana’s Beauty Supply,” Dana’s Beauty Supply, published 2022,
https://www.danasbeautysupply.com/.
245 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”

108
“intimacies”246 with insights from techno-Orientalism, Afrofuturism, and other futurist
reimaginings, Luo analyzes how different cultural and theoretical perspectives envision
global futures.247 For example, Luo presents case studies of Renina Jarmon’s
“#Blackgirlsarefromthefuture” and Caitlin O’Neill’s “Afrofuturist Feminist Manifesto”
to argue that these intersectional ideologies not only challenge both Western liberal
narratives of progress and male-dominant visions of the future, but also combat the
erasure of Black people from mainstream future visions and offering unique insights
into liberation beyond white-dominant influence.248
In “Why Afro Asia” (2023), Joan Kee notes, “among the failures of globalization
as an art-historical mandate is its inability to respect how art worlds outside former
imperial metropoles and present institutional centers participate in their own selfdetermination.”249 The creators and their works that Western institutions and markets
choose to acknowledge represent only a small subset of non-Western examples, and
often fail to reflect what communities outside the Western sphere consider most
significant to their cultural heritage and artistic development.250
Kee expands this idea by reimagining Afro Asia as an “intentionally unspecifiable
heuristic” rather than merely representing historical cooperation between African and
Asian countries.251 This perspective brings attention to previously overlooked cultural
and artistic connections, such as Ashanti influences in 1960s Korean printmaking252 and
Black engagements, specifically African American experiences, with Japanese
246 Lisa Lowe, The Intimacies of Four Continents (Duke University Press, 2015),
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375647.
247 Lowe, The Intimacies of Four Continents. 248 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”
249 Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” 139.
250 Joan Kee, The Geometries of Afro Asia (University of California Press, 2023).
251 Kee, “Why Afro Asia.”
252 Kee, The Geometries of Afro Asia, 32–33.

109
experimentalism.253 These influences reveal how marginalized communities have
historically supported each other’s survival and cultural preservation through
interconnected networks of resistance and creativity.
In “Remembering Fred Ho: The Legacy of Afro Asian Futurism” (2016), Zachary
Price analyzes how Fred Ho’s strategic integration of disparate cultural elements
functioned as a mechanism for challenging hegemonic narratives. Through innovative
artistic productions such as the Afro Asian Music Ensemble and Voice of the Dragon,
which synthesized Chinese mythology, martial arts, and jazz traditions, Ho
demonstrates how Afro-Asian Futurism could facilitate new forms of cross-cultural
dialogue and creative expression by merging traditional artistic practices. His
methodological approach to merging distinct cultural traditions effectively generated
counter-memories to dominant cultural paradigms. This framework provides valuable
insights regarding the potential applications of genAI technology, which facilitates rapid
experimentation in combining diverse cultural elements and ideas. Where Ho’s hybrid
performances generated what Price terms “nonessentialist identity formations,” genAI’s
capacity for swift cultural synthesis and recombination could similarly enable creators to
interrogate traditional narratives and explore new or hybrid modes of cultural
expression. 254
253 William H Bridges, “In the Beginning: Blackness and the 1960s Creative Nonfiction of Ōe Kenzaburō,”
Positions: Asia Critique 25 (April 2017): 323–49, https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-3852249.
254 Zachary Price, “Remembering Fred Ho: The Legacy of Afro Asian Futurism,” TDR/The Drama Review
60, no. 2, (2016): 48, https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00547.

110
Fig. 3.13: Scene from Voice of the Dragon: Once Upon a Time in Chinese America. (Performance at Kean
College, New Jersey, 2004, featuring Chen Jak and Fred Ho with the Afro Asian Musical Ensemble.
Screen capture from Big Red Media Inc. Published in Zachary Price, “Remembering Fred Ho: The Legacy
of Afro Asian Futurism,” TDR/the Drama Review 60, no. 2 [2016]: 48-67,
https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00547).
In Afro Asia: Revolutionary Political and Cultural Connections between African
Americans and Asian Americans, Fred Ho and Bill V. Mullen expanded on the historical
solidarity between Black and Asian communities through W.E.B. Du Bois’s relationships
with Asian leaders. They demonstrated how their shared resistance against Western
imperialism and colonization created enduring political and cultural connections that
challenged racial hierarchies and hegemonic power structures.255 Building on this
framework, the capabilities of genAI could help surface and preserve important
intercultural histories between Asian and Black communities that might otherwise be
lost to memoricide. GenAI trained on diverse cultural datasets could analyze and
connect archival materials documenting the history of solidarity between Asian
American and African American activists, generate new artistic works that highlight
255 Price, “Remembering Fred Ho: The Legacy of Afro Asian Futurism,” 49.

111
overlooked connections while respecting distinct community experiences, and help
generate and preserve hybrid cultural expressions that challenge essentialist categories.
The intersectional approach to Afro-Asian futurist dialogues serves as a critical
methodology for disrupting hegemonic narratives, particularly in counter-memory
discourse. The significance of this approach lies in its ability to challenge parochial
lenses that often reinforce Western dominance in viewing cultural production through
race, nationality, and era.256 It creates a platform where multiple forms of resistance and
cultural expressions can coexist and strengthen each other, proposing alternative ways
of understanding artistic influence and cultural exchange while resisting Western
interpretations of value imposed through historical categorizations and hierarchies.257 In
this context, genAI could assist in reconstructing suppressed counter-memories by
synthesizing fragmentary records and cultural artifacts to reveal alternative artistic
genealogies and connections. This is important since, as Kee notes regarding the
concept of “artwork sovereignty,” many works establish “their own laws outside statesanctioned categories of difference.”258
While Afrofuturism emerged as a response to how “Western imaginations of
Africa and the Black diaspora have long linked Blackness to the very antithesis of
modernity,” its connection with Asian Futurism and other CoFuturist movements
emphasizes the need to inform each other of alternate future visions by questioning
linear narratives of progress, advancement, and development.259 Both movements work
to reclaim their presence in future imaginings while questioning established historic and
temporal boundaries. They engage with technological and cultural hybridity while
challenging reductive narratives—whether techno-Orientalist stereotypes or the erasure
256 Kee, “Why Afro Asia.”
257 Kee, The Geometries of Afro Asia. 258 Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” 162.
259 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”

112
of Black futures. Therefore, the intersectionality of these movements reveals shared
strategic elements: they stress cultural sovereignty while acknowledging the importance
of cross-cultural dialogue and exchange, and their approach to temporal flexibility
challenges “linear logics of progress and conventional ideas of modernity” by creating
alternative chronologies and histories.260
Fig. 3.14: Work (Water). (Sadamasa Motonaga, installation view from First Gutai Art Exhibition, Tokyo,
October 1955. Published in Joan Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” October 186 [2023]: 137-162,
https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00502).
The transition to genAI-assisted counter-memories represents both a
technological and conceptual evolution in heritage conservation. For genAI to work
effectively, its training data must reflect the intersectional nature of resistance and
cultural exchange. Unlike traditional methods of historic preservation that often
privilege written documents, official records, and institutional archives, genAI can help
process and integrate diverse forms of counter-memories once they have been digitized
or transcribed. While genAI cannot create genuine oral histories or replicate tacit
knowledge, it can help transform these existing materials, such as recorded oral
histories, documented personal narratives, and digitized visual art, into new forms of
cultural expression and analysis.
260 Luo, “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia 天下), and
Afrofuturism.”

113
Fig. 3.15: R.S.V.P. I. (Senga Nengudi, “Installation Instructions,” unpublished manuscript, Painting and
Sculpture Object Study, MoMA. 1977. Published in Joan Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” October 186 [2023]: 137-162,
https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00502).
While genAI models are trained on vast datasets that include diverse cultural
materials, their outputs can reflect and reinforce dominant narratives due to the
overwhelming prevalence of hegemonic perspectives in their training data.
261 The
challenge lies not in the absence of intersectional content, but rather in the need to
intentionally amplify APIA and other marginalized voices and perspectives against the
statistical weight of mainstream hegemonic narratives. When specifically directed
toward analyzing connections between works from diaspora communities, genAI could
help surface patterns and relationships that challenge existing dominant narratives.
Through careful curation and filtering of training data to emphasize intersectional
perspectives, genAI can better analyze experiential and experimental forms that
resonate with APIA diaspora and their lived experiences. For example, genAI could
analyze visual patterns and connections to identify formal and conceptual relationships
between works like Senga Nengudi’s installation R.S.V.P. I (1977) and Sadamasa
Motonaga’s Work (Water) (1995).
262 Despite being decades apart, these works share
important qualities in their exploration of materiality and space, and genAI-assisted
261 Nicoletti and Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse.”
262 Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” 150–52.

114
analysis could surface other examples of resonances that transcend traditional
geographic and temporal boundaries.263
This approach opens possibilities for reimagining futures that resonate deeply
with community members by grounding speculative visions in historical patterns of
resistance and cultural hybridity. As demonstrated in Sun Young Shin’s collection of
poetry, Unbearable Splendor (2016), the figure of the cyborg becomes a potent metaphor
for exploring the experience of a Korean adoptee, where questions of identity,
belonging, and origin exist in a complex hybrid space.264 Shin, herself a Korean adoptee
to a white American family, destabilizes the traditional “lyric I”265 of poetry, the selfvoice in poems, by purposefully embracing collectivist narrative forms that Western
perspectives often misinterpret as a negation of individual agency.266 By revealing how
marginalized communities have historically created spaces for mutual support and
cultural innovation, genAI-assisted counter-memories can inspire new forms of crosscultural collaboration and resistance. These reconstructed stories and imagined futures
challenge not only Western hegemonic narratives but also the false dichotomy between
individualism and collectivism that has been used to denigrate Asian cultural
perspectives.
For APIA and Black communities specifically, genAI offers unique opportunities
for collaborative memory work. Shin’s work demonstrates how technology can be used
to explore what she phrases as “genealogical isolation”267 while simultaneously creating
263 Kee, “Why Afro Asia,” 150–52.
264 Claire Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human,” ed. Taryne Jade Taylor et al., 1st ed.,
The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms (Taylor & Francis, 2023), 368–78, https://doiorg.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.4324/9780429317828.
265 Rejecting the traditional poetic "lyric I" with its singular, coherent voice, Shin uses posthuman figures -
the Minotaur, Pinocchio, and cyborg - to explore how a Korean adoptee with white parents creates an
unsettling sense of the uncanny for white observers unfamiliar with such genealogical isolation from one's
cultural origins.
266 Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human,” 371.
267 Shin describes it as the experiences of isolation from her Korean cultural and familial roots while
simultaneously being perceived as racially and culturally different from her adoptive family.

115
new forms of connection and kinship.268 According to Claire Stanford in “In the future,
No One is Completely Human” (2023), rather than viewing collective consciousness as a
diminishment, Shin presents it as an expansion—one that challenges the Western liberal
humanist subject that grants full humanity only to white, male individuals.269 Her work
suggests how genAI could be employed to map complex familial and cultural networks
that extend beyond traditional Western frameworks. GenAI can identify patterns of
cultural exchange and mutual influence that might be overlooked by traditional
historical methods, helping to document and amplify histories of solidarity and shared
struggle.
As Shin shows through her use of the collective “we” voice in poems like
“Autoclonography,” genAI through Asian Futurism can help articulate forms of
belonging that transcend conventional boundaries of race, nation, and species.270 As
Stanford notes, this “we” voice represents what narrative theorist Brian Richardson
describes as “a collective subject in opposition to the hegemonic paradigm of the isolated
Western consciousness.”271 By doing so, Shin points to the fact that “the English
language itself privileges self-centeredness and individuation by capitalizing the “I” even
in the middle of the sentence, when no other pronoun is capitalized.”272 GenAI’s ability
to process multiple languages and cultural contexts simultaneously makes it especially
valuable for tracking diasporic histories and cross-cultural connections. Incorporating
intersectional perspectives in the training process of genAI enables dynamic, layered
representations that better reflect the diversity and complexity of Asian and APIA
identities beyond Orientalist constraints.
268 Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human.”
269 Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human,” 373.
270 Kathleen Rooney, “Unmapped Realms: Sun Yung Shin’s ‘Unbearable Splendor’,” Los Angeles Review of
Books, October 2016, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/unmapped-realms-sun-yung-shins-unbearablesplendor/.
271 Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human,” 373.
272 Stanford, “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human,” 372.

116
However, this movement must navigate deeply entrenched stereotypes, systemic
discrimination, and geopolitical tensions that continue to shape experiences of Black,
APIA, and other marginalized groups. Using genAI through an intersectional lens
requires encoding the understanding of how white supremacy manipulates intergroup
relations while advocating for more expansive visions of racial justice and coalitionbuilding. In their 2022 article on Claire Jean Kim’s racial triangulation theory, Sonya G.
Chen and Christian Hosam explains that Kim’s framework helps explain why BlackAPIA solidarity has often been difficult to achieve “under a system of white supremacy,”
despite the potential impact of cross-racial solidarity as a means of resistance.273 The
expectation that Black Americans must act as caretakers for other racial minorities, as
reflected in media representations, both strains inter-minority and cross-racial relations
and obscures the role of hegemonic narrative in perpetuating these tensions.274 Chen and
Hosam cite Char Adams’s 2021 article, “How Black People Can Be Strong Allies to Asian
Americans Now,” which drew criticism for placing the responsibility of allyship solely
on Black Americans while largely ignoring the white supremacy’s role, as exemplified in
the 2021 murder of six Asian workers in Atlanta.
Critical participation in genAI’s development becomes paramount for APIA
communities to prevent the perpetuation of existing biases and ensure these
technologies do not further entrench problematic representations. By actively engaging
in genAI development and data curation through Afrofuturist, Asian Futurist, and other
CoFuturist frameworks, APIA communities can help encode alternative worldviews,
histories, and futures that challenge dominant narratives while ensuring genAI models
reflect their values, experiences, and aspirations. This participation must extend beyond
surface-level representation to include fundamental decisions about how these
273 Sonya G. Chen and Christian Hosam, “Claire Jean Kim’s Racial Triangulation at 20: Rethinking BlackAsian Solidarity and Political Science,” Politics, Groups, and Identities 10 (March 2022): 455–60,
https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2044870.
274 Chen and Hosam, “Claire Jean Kim’s Racial Triangulation at 20: Rethinking Black-Asian Solidarity and
Political Science,” 456.

117
technologies process, generate, and interpret the nuances within APIA communities and
the field of landscape architecture and heritage conservation—a transformation that
begins with awareness and active engagement in shaping the future of genAI-assisted
counter-memory.
RECLAMATION AS COUNTER-MEMORY
Asian Futurism thus serves multiple interconnected purposes: preserving cultural
memory, processing historical trauma, strengthening community identity, and creating
frameworks for imagining decolonial futures. Through creative works across various
media, it demonstrates how heritage reclamation and counter-memory formation are
not just about looking backward but are crucial tools for imagining and creating
different possibilities for the future.
The reclamation of data by APIA, Indigenous, and other marginalized
communities represents a critical shift in how these frontline communities can preserve
and shape their own narratives. For APIA communities, this reclamation becomes
especially important in the context of Asian Futurism, where control over technology
and data can help challenge the legacies of techno-Orientalist stereotypes and systematic
erasure of identities. This has become increasingly important due to the ubiquity of
genAI-assisted technologies infiltrating our increasingly connected society, particularly
regarding the lack of appropriate governance over the method, sources, and types of
information being scraped for training current foundation models that power genAI’s
capabilities.275 As highlighted in “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People,”
the act of reclaiming data or achieving data sovereignty is fundamentally about
resistance and self-determination.276 As Keoni Mahelona states, “Data is the last frontier
275 Julia Zorthian, “OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Agrees AI Must Be Regulated,” TIME, May 2023,
https://time.com/6280372/sam-altman-chatgpt-regulate-ai/.
276 Karen Hao, “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People,” MIT Technology Review, April 22,
2022, https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/22/1050394/artificial-intelligence-for-the-people/.

118
of colonization,” thus highlighting how control over data and its interpretation directly
impacts cultural survival and autonomy.277
The case of Te Hiku Media in New Zealand demonstrates how AI technologies
can be transformed from tools of cultural erasure into instruments of heritage
conservation and cultural revitalization. Peter-Lucas Jones and Keoni Mahelona created
their own genAI language tools to help revitalize the Maori language, te reo Māori. A
key aspect of this undertaking was its participatory component, where they asked
community members to record themselves reading pre-written sentences that captured
the full range of te reo pronunciations and sounds. The result was a collection of “310
hours of speech-text pairs from some 200,000 recordings made by roughly 2,500 people,”
which led to the creation of “te reo speech recognition model with 86% accuracy.”278
Their work is a powerful testament that when communities control their own
data and genAI development process, they can create technologies that serve their
specific needs while protecting their cultural sovereignty. In the 2024 article, “Abundant
Intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge framework,” by Lewis,
Whaanga, and Yologotmez, the outlined framework demonstrates how Indigenous
knowledge systems provide robust conceptual foundations for developing genAI in ways
that integrate with existing cultural practices and optimize for community flourishing
rather than from a scarcity mindset.279 This approach moves beyond viewing AI bias as
merely an ethical issue, instead recognizing it as stemming from “fundamental
epistemological shortcomings” that systematically operationalize discrimination “against
non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples.”280
277 Hao, “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People.”
278 Hao, “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People.”
279 Jason Edward Lewis, Hēmi Whaanga, and Ceyda Yolgörmez, “Abundant Intelligences: Placing AI
within Indigenous Knowledge Frameworks,” AI & Society, (October 2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-
024-02099-4.
280 Lewis, Whaanga, and Yolgörmez, “Abundant Intelligences: Placing AI within Indigenous Knowledge
Frameworks.”

119
This significance extends beyond just data collection and processing—it requires
fundamentally reconceptualizing how genAI systems are conceived, developed, and
implemented. As Lewis et al. argue, Indigenous and other marginalized communities
must be involved from the foundation to ensure genAI serves their sovereignty rather
than perpetuating colonial practices of extraction and erasure.281
The risks of not controlling genAI technology development are clear, as
demonstrated by Jones and Mahelona’s experimental work with AI tools and language
preservation. Conventional approaches to genAI development often exploit Indigenous
and minority data without providing corresponding benefits to the communities.282 For
instance, the pair raised concerns that their “data would be used by the very people that
beat that language out of our mouths to sell it back to us as a service,” comparing it to
“taking our land and selling it back to us.”283 This concern proved prophetic when
services like Duolingo later began working with Māori speakers to build a language
learning app to be marketed back to the community.284
When communities maintain data sovereignty and center their own knowledge
frameworks, they can create genAI systems that preserve and revitalize cultural heritage
while building capacity for self-determination. This represents a profound form of
resistance to technological colonialism by ensuring genAI development aligns with
community values and needs rather than external interests.
For APIA communities, Asian Futurism provides this critical framework through
which self-directed genAI development can counter reductive narratives while creating
counter-memories for future generations. This framework enables APIA communities to
281 Lewis, Whaanga, and Yolgörmez, “Abundant Intelligences: Placing AI within Indigenous Knowledge
Frameworks.”
282 Sarah Myers West, Meredith Whittaker, and Kate Crawford, “Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race,
and Power in AI,” AI NOW Institute, April 2019, https://ainowinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/04/discriminatingsystems.pdf.
283 Hao, “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People.”
284 Hao, “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People.”

120
reimagine their relationship with technology while preserving their cultural heritage and
identity.
Contemporary APIA writers, such as Franny Choi and Sun Young Shin, illustrate
this reimagining in practice. In Soft Science, an anthology of poems by Franny Choi, she
deliberately engages with technology and codework to process her immigrant
experience, noting that “English was a technology I learned to use to navigate the world
safely.”285 Rather than rejecting associations between APIA identity and technology, she
repurposes these connections to explore deeper themes of language, belonging, and
identity. Her poem “The Cyborg Wants to Make Sure She Heard You Right” illustrates
this approach by processing a series of hostile tweets directly at her through multiple
rounds of Google Translate’s AI-based translation engine.286 As Stanford observed in her
writing “In the Future, No One is Completely Human” (2023), the resulting product
demonstrates the “persistence of racialized and sexualized language while
simultaneously disempowering these kinds of utterances by rendering them
incomprehensible.”287 Through this manipulation via genAI technology, Choi
transforms hostile language into a powerful commentary on racism and identity in the
digital age.
Similarly, Sun Yung Shin’s poetry collection Unbearable Splendor employs the
figure of the cyborg to examine her experience as a Korean adoptee, demonstrating how
technological metaphors can be reclaimed to discuss displacement and cultural
hybridity.288 Her work creates a series of counter-memories that challenges simplified
techno-Orientalist stereotypes by embracing complexity and nuance in exploring the
intersection of technology and identity. Together, these writers show how APIA artists
285 Taylor et al., The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms, 375.
286 Button Poetry, “Franny Choi - @FannyChoir,” YouTube, February 18, 2019,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOItI-NKKoI.
287 Taylor et al., The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms, 376.
288 Sun Yung Shin, Unbearable Splendor, 1st ed. (Coffee House Press, 2016).

121
are actively reshaping narratives around technology and identity while creating new
frameworks for understanding cultural heritage in the digital age.
The value of these reframed approaches becomes even more apparent when
considering how data erasure perpetuates historical injustices while maintaining
hierarchies. When APIA and other non-dominant perspectives are absent from data and
technology, that void gets filled with stereotypes and colonial narratives.289 Through
reclamation of their own data and the lens of Asian Futurism, APIA communities can
ensure their perspectives are accurately represented and transmitted, creating countermemories that challenge dominant narratives.
Te Hiku Media’s development of te reo genAI-assisted language tools
demonstrates how technology can be shaped to serve community needs while
maintaining cultural protocols and values. This reclamation of data through Asian
Futurist frameworks offers unprecedented opportunities for future generations of APIA
communities to be in control of their own narratives. For example, Michael Running
Wolf, an Indigenous technologist inspired by the te reo project, began developing
language recognition software for the Makah people of the Pacific Northwest coast.290
By developing genAI-assisted systems that incorporate low-resource languages,
knowledge systems, and worldviews, APIA communities can help their cultural heritage
remain viable and accessible in an increasingly digital world.
This approach provides future generations with tools to shape their own
narratives free from techno-Orientalist stereotypes and Western technological
hegemony while also enabling them to actively participate in creating and preserving
their cultural heritage through technology tools that reflect their values, experiences,
289 Lewis, Whaanga, and Yolgörmez, “Abundant Intelligences: Placing AI within Indigenous Knowledge
Frameworks.”
290 Luke Ottenhof, “‘It’s Like Dropping a Bomb on the Louvre:’ The Remarkable Race to Save These
Critical Languages Before They Die,” Popular Mechanics, October 25, 2023,
https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/a45521181/will-artificial-intelligence-save-native-languages/.

122
and aspirations. The principles outlined in “Abundant Intelligences” provide a valuable
model for how APIA and other marginalized communities can approach genAI
development in ways that protect cultural interests while leveraging technology for
genuine community benefit. By grounding genAI in APIA epistemologies and
frameworks of abundance rather than scarcity, communities can transform these
powerful tools from instruments of oppression into engines of cultural preservation and
flourishing.
COMMUNITY-LED GENAI DEVELOPMENT
For heritage conservationists and landscape architects, properly trained genAI
foundation models, amplified with diverse datasets, offer unique opportunities to
advance Asian Futurist visions. GenAI-assisted technologies can help preserve not just
languages and stories, but entire worldviews, memories, and ways of understanding
landscape, space, and place. As noted in “Abundant Intelligences,” Indigenous
knowledge systems include practices excluded by Western scientific method, as “stories,
songs, dance, and lore all embed knowledge about the world and facilitate its rigorous
transmission from one generation to the next.”291
Building on the principles of Asian Futurism and data sovereignty, the successful
development and deployment of genAI tools for APIA communities requires more than
enhancing technical capacity and capabilities. They demand new frameworks for data
governance and ownership. Te Hiku’s development of a data license based on the Maori
principle of kaitiakitanga (guardianship) offers a model for how APIA communities can
maintain control over their cultural data while still engaging with larger technological
systems. This approach ensures genAI-assisted systems serve as tools for cultural
preservation and revitalization rather than exploitation.
291 West, Whittaker, and Crawford, “Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race, and Power in AI,” April 2019.

123
Leveraging genAI to create Asian Futurist works that accurately reflect APIA
communities requires integrating advanced technologies with deep cultural insights into
their histories, identities, and aspirations through community-driven processes. As
demonstrated in “Do Generative AI Models Output Harm While Representing Nonwestern Cultures: Evidence from a Community-Centered Approach” (2024) by Sourojit
Ghosh, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sanjana Gautam, Shomir Wilson, and Aylin
Caliskan, findings on gender and racial bias findings on AI-assisted resume screening
shows that careful attention must be paid to training data and model development to
avoid perpetuating existing inequities.292 Taking inspiration from successful communityled genAI initiatives, APIA communities in Los Angeles can develop protocols for
collecting, curating and controlling relevant training datasets, including historical texts,
cultural artifacts, oral histories, and contemporary experiences. This method aligns with
frameworks, like those used by Te Hiku Media, where Indigenous communities
maintain sovereignty over language data and genAI development.
The emphasis on ideation and filtering skills in genAI-assisted projects aligns well
with the goals of creating counter-memories, enabling APIA artists, historians, and
community members to focus on conceptualizing important stories and carefully
curating AI-generated outputs that ensure accurate and respectful representation of
community heritage. Drawing from Lukman E. Mansuri and D. A. Patel’s case study
“Artificial Intelligence for Heritage Conservation: A Case Study of Automatic Visual
Inspection System (2022),” which details the development of genAI systems for heritage
conservation with deep local knowledge, APIA communities can create training
modules that enable members to easily access and guide genAI in drafting presentations,
stories and other story-sharing formats that highlight APIA presence and contributions.
292 Sourojit Ghosh et al., “Do Generative AI Models Output Harm While Representing Non-Western
Cultures: Evidence from a Community-Centered Approach,” Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI/ACM
Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society 7 (October 2024): 476–89,
https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31651.

124
This could include exploring themes like migration, cultural preservation, and
technological advancement through a lens of community self-determination.
Visual art produced through community-guided generative models can
thoughtfully combine various aesthetic elements, creating new visual languages for
APIA futures. Performance applications like genAI-assisted choreography, blending
traditional Asian dance with contemporary movements, could be developed using
protocols that ensure cultural elements are treated with appropriate meaning and
context.293 By centering APIA communities in the development process—from data
collection through implementation—genAI can become a powerful tool for creating
immersive Asian Futurist works.
Speculative projects following Te Hiku Media’s methodologies could include
developing training modules that help community members access genAI for
storytelling and presentations, while exploring themes of migration, heritage
conservation, and technological advancement. Generative adversarial networks
(GANs)—learning frameworks for genAI, ideal for generating realistic visuals— could
create visual art merging traditional Asian aesthetics with speculative elements, while
genAI-enhanced choreography could be integrated into performances, films, and
augmented reality (AR)/virtual reality (VR) applications to immerse audiences in Asian
Futurist experiences.
Practical applications include using genAI to support grant writing for APIA
futures projects and creating platforms for exhibiting and distributing AI-generated
works to ensure broader audience reach and accessibility. Educational initiatives with
universities and cultural institutions can teach APIA youth about genAI and its creative
293 Pataranutaporn et al., "Human-AI Co-Dancing: Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative
Choreography with Generative Virtual Characters.”

125
potential, fostering a new generation of artists proficient in both technology and
cultural expression.294
Community engagement remains central to this vision through interactive
workshops where participants can experience genAI-created works and provide
feedback, ensuring that the content reflects community values and aspirations. Public
forums with artists, technologists, and community leaders can guide future projects.
Through thoughtful implementation of genAI with cultural awareness and inclusivity,
creators can develop Asian Futurist works that center and advance APIA communities’
narratives in Los Angeles.
These collaborative efforts enable APIA-led genAI projects to challenge
stereotypes, promote cultural pride, and envision empowering futures while creating
meaningful counter-memories. The reclamation of AI development by APIA
communities ensures technological advancement supports rather than erases cultural
diversity. As Lewis et al. note in “Abundant Intelligences,” this work is about “creating
capacity within the communities to engage with the complexity of AI technologies at
different levels.”295 By controlling both development and resulting technologies, APIA
communities can ensure their heritage actively shapes our technological future through
Asian Futurism.
294 Images of projects can be found here: https://www.instagram.com/landscape.futures.lab/
295 Lewis, Whaanga, and Yolgörmez, “Abundant Intelligences: Placing AI within Indigenous Knowledge
Frameworks.”

126
4) CHAPTER 4
The chapter investigates two primary areas. First, it examines genAI as an effective
and efficient design tool for landscape visualization, proposing it as a viable alternative
to traditional rendering techniques for the creation of counter-memories.296 This raises
the question: How can the current generation of genAI technology serve as a design tool
for visualizing landscapes, specifically in representing APIA cultural landscapes in Los
Angeles? Second, it investigates whether the accessibility and rapid deployment
capabilities of genAI chatbots could democratize community involvement in the
ideation and design phases of community and urban planning processes. In particular,
can genAI democratize the creation of visual counter-memories by making them more
accessible to APIA community members who may lack traditional artistic or design
skills?
A CASE FOR GENAI IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Digital design technology continues to transform how practitioners, researchers,
and communities approach landscape architecture and heritage conservation. These
fields have embraced various tools, from historic building information modeling (BIM)
and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) hardware to cloud-based data management
platforms, setting the stage for genAI’s emergence as the next frontier in digital heritage
preservation.297 The integration of various AI-assisted tools, including machine learning
(ML), generative adversarial networks (GAN), and natural language processing (NLP),
has already demonstrated promising capabilities in aggregating historic building data,298
296 In this context, ‘effective and efficient’ refers to faster image generation with comparable visual quality
to traditional digital imaging software such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and GIMP
297 Valeria Croce et al., “H-BIM and Artificial Intelligence: Classification of Architectural Heritage for
Semi-Automatic Scan-to-BIM Reconstruction,” Sensors 23 (February 2023): 2497,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052497.
298 Konstantina Siountri and Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos, “The Classification of Cultural Heritage
Buildings in Athens Using Deep Learning Techniques,” Heritage 6 (April 2023): 3673–3705,
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6040195.

127
performing scan-to-BIM reconstruction,299 identifying degradation patterns,300 and
utilizing satellite data for cultural landscape preservation.301
These limitations underscore the importance of APIA communities maintaining
agency over their narratives even as they leverage technology advancements. The tech
industry’s current trajectory, exemplified by OpenAI’s shift from nonprofit to for-profit
status and the persistent “move fast and break things” philosophy, raises concerns about
who controls and benefits from genAI development and its pervasiveness. For APIA
communities, these shifts could disproportionately impact how their histories and
cultures are represented and preserved in digital spaces.
The research paper, “Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and Art”
(2024) by researchers Eric Zhou and Dokyun Lee, examines how genAI tools affect
human creativity and artistic output. Their analysis covered over four million artworks
from more than 50,000 users and 5,800 known AI adopters on a major (undisclosed) artsharing platform.302 When artists adopted text-to-image AI tools like Midjourney, Stable
Diffusion, and DALL-E, they produced approximately seven additional artworks in their
first month, increasing to fifteen more in the following month. This represented a 50%
increase in productivity— measured by the number of artworks users post each month—
that doubled in the subsequent month.303 The value of their work, measured by the rate
299 Croce et al., “H-BIM and Artificial Intelligence: Classification of Architectural Heritage for SemiAutomatic Scan-to-BIM Reconstruction.”
300 S Scandurra and E Lanzara, “VPL FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE MONITORING: SAMPLING AND
COMPARISON OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry,
Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLVIII-M-2–2023 (June 2023): 1435–42,
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-2-2023-1435-2023.
301 Joaquim J Sousa et al., “Using Machine Learning and Satellite Data from Multiple Sources to Analyze
Mining, Water Management, and Preservation of Cultural Heritage,” Geo-Spatial Information Science 27
(July 2023): 552–71, https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2234008.
302 Authors did not disclose the name of this art sharing platform
303 Eric Zhou and Dokyun Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art,” PNAS
Nexus 3 (March 2024): 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052.

128
at which viewers marked artworks as favorites, increased from 2% to 3% over six
months.304
The study introduces generative synesthesia to describe how artists blend human
creativity with genAI capabilities in their workflows.
305 Artists provide text prompts to
guide text-to-image AI generation, then curate and refine the outputs based on their
creative vision. The researchers identified two types of novelty: Content Novelty and
Visual Novelty.
306 Content Novelty refers to what the artwork depicts—its subjects, ideas,
and their interactions. For example, this distinguishes between common subjects like “a
river cutting through mountains” versus something more unexpected like “raining cats
and dogs.” Visual Novelty refers to technical elements, color choices, brush types,
textures, patterns, and overall style, measuring whether the artwork uses conventional
techniques or employs unconventional stylistic approaches like contrasting neon colors
and sharp geometric patterns against traditional figure painting
Artists who explored new creative territory with genAI received more positive
responses from peers, regardless of their pre-AI work’s originality. Success required two
key skills: ideation (ability to conceive novel concepts) and artistic filtering (selecting
and refining AI-generated/assisted outputs). The research revealed that genAI adoption
led to a more even distribution of favorites across artists on the platform, extending
recognition beyond a small group of top creators. This suggests genAI tools may level
the playing field in digital art communities by enabling more artists to create work that
resonates with viewers.
307
Most landscape architecture practitioners, educators, and students are proficient
in digital design techniques including CAD-based two-dimensional (2D) and threedimensional (3D) modeling, raster and vector graphics manipulation, parametric design,
304 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”
305 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”
306 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”
307 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”

129
and geospatial analysis. While technical tools and skill sets evolve, the speed and
magnitude of genAI advancement signal a new level of transformation in the skills
required by landscape architects and specialists in heritage conservation. This shift not
only necessitates an exploration of how new or iterative technologies impact our
practice but also unveils new possibilities for creative, innovative, and collaborative
approaches to landscape architecture and heritage conservation.
LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS VS. CULTURAL LANDSCAPES
Landscapes are complex entities that transcend mere physical characteristics,
encompassing the interplay between nature, environment, human activities, and
cultural perceptions. Both the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) and the United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) recognize landscapes as
products of long-term interactions between people and their surroundings, emphasizing
their historic significance and the integration of natural and cultural elements.308
When considering the application of genAI to APIA sites of significance, two
crucial frameworks must be considered: landscape aesthetics and cultural landscapes.
While landscape aesthetics focuses on the visual and experiential qualities that shape our
appreciation of environments, cultural landscapes encompass the broader historical and
social processes that have shaped these spaces over time. Understanding both
perspectives is essential, as each reveals distinct opportunities for using genAI to
preserve and represent APIA heritage—from recreating lost visual elements to
documenting counter-memories that challenge dominant historical narratives.
The integration of these concepts are crucial to comprehensive landscape
architecture, heritage conservation, and planning efforts that respect both visual
qualities and cultural significance—including using genAI to recreate lost sites. This dual
308 UNESCO, “Cultural Landscapes.”

130
perspective is particularly relevant in the context of digital design technologies, which
have revolutionized landscape architecture since the late twentieth century.309
These complementary perspectives—landscape aesthetics and cultural landscape—
acknowledge the role of human activities in shaping landscapes, whether through
intentional design or gradual evolution. They recognize the cultural and aesthetic values
associated with landscapes, demonstrating an understanding of their diverse forms and
origins. This approach encompasses physical, historical, cultural, and aesthetic
dimensions, providing a holistic framework for analyzing and interpreting landscapes,
including in the context of preserving and representing APIA heritage.
Fig. 4.1: Photograph showing Asian fishermen processing abalones on the Channel Islands during the late
19th/early 20th century, illustrating the labor-intensive nature of the short-lived abalone industry.
(Edwards, “A Short-Lived Livelihood: Chinese and Japanese Abalone Fishermen,” Channel Islands
National Park, National Park Service, July 15, 2024).
Landscape aesthetics refers to the visual and sensory qualities that evoke
appreciation or pleasure in observers. Rooted in environmental psychology and aesthetic
philosophy, this concept explores the factors that determine environmental appeal and
309 Xiwei Shen, Mary G. Padua, and Niall G. Kirkwood, “Transformative Impact of Technology in
Landscape Architecture on Landscape Research: Trends, Concepts and Roles,” Land 13 (May 2024): 630,
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050630.

131
impact.310 It examines how physical features like topography, vegetation, water bodies,
and built elements influence our perceptions and emotional responses. For example,
Californian coastal landscapes that combine sea views and forested areas would receive
high aesthetic ratings, in comparison to the streetscape of Skid Row, in Los Angeles,
demonstrating how integrated natural and constructed elements can trigger strong
positive emotional responses.
The distinction between landscape aesthetics and cultural landscape lies primarily
in their scope and focus: while landscape aesthetics encompass visual and experiential
aspects, cultural landscapes embody the broader historical and cultural processes
shaping them over time. These concepts frequently intersect and inform each other, as
aesthetic appreciation is culturally conditioned, and cultural landscapes often possess
significant aesthetic dimensions.311 The San Miguel Island Abalone Fishery in the
Channel Islands National Park illustrates this intersection within an APIA context. Its
natural coastal beauty is enriched by archaeological remains of Chinese and Japanese
fishing operations from the 1850s through the early 1900s.312 These remains include base
camps where fishermen lived and processed their catch, shell middens,313 and various
cultural artifacts. Archaeological excavations in 2006 at Point Bennett on San Miguel
Island uncovered over 350 historic artifacts, including distinctive Chinese “Double
Happiness” bowls predating 1870, Japanese Meiji-period (late 1800s to early 1900s)
ceramics, glass bottles, smoking pipes, opium boxes, and personal items like carved sea
lion teeth and buttons.314 Many of these sites were initially established by Chinese
310 Johannes Langemeyer, Fulvia Calcagni, and Francesc Baró, “Mapping the Intangible: Using
Geolocated Social Media Data to Examine Landscape Aesthetics,” Land Use Policy 77 (September 2018):
542–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049, (hereafter cited as Mapping Land Use)
311 UNESCO, “Cultural Landscapes.”
312 Channel Islands National Park, “A Short-Lived Livelihood: Chinese and Japanese Abalone Fishermen
(U.S. National Park Service)” (Nps.gov, July 2024), https://home.nps.gov/articles/chinese-and-japaneseabalone-fishermen.htm.
313 Middens are piles of discarded abalone shells. 314 Channel Islands National Park, “A Short-Lived Livelihood: Chinese and Japanese Abalone Fishermen
(U.S. National Park Service).”

132
fishermen in the mid-1800s and later reused by Japanese divers, demonstrating the
historic succession of these fishing communities. These elements not only shape the
visual landscape but also narrate the story of APIA resilience and economic
contributions despite discriminatory practices during the late nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries.315

Fig. 4.2: (left) Photograph displaying various types of abalone and bone fishhooks discovered on Santa
Barbara Island, providing evidence of the tools and techniques employed by Chinese and Japanese
fishermen in the Channel Islands abalone industry. (National Park Service, “A Short-Lived Livelihood:
Chinese and Japanese Abalone Fishermen,” Channel Islands National Park, July 15, 2024).
Fig. 4.3: (right) Image depicting a shell midden on San Miguel Island, a discarded accumulation of abalone
shells. (National Park Service, “A Short-Lived Livelihood: Chinese and Japanese Abalone Fishermen,”
Channel Islands National Park, July 15, 2024).
Cultural landscapes offer a more holistic perspective. UNESCO defines cultural
landscapes as “combined works of nature and humankind” that express the intimate
relationship between people and their natural environment.316 This concept encompasses
the historical, social, and cultural dimensions that have shaped landscapes over
generations, viewing them as living archives of human history that embody traditional
land-use practices, belief systems, and social structures. These landscapes range from the
315 APIAHiP, “Historypin,” Historypin, published May 24, 2024, https://www.historypin.org/en/east-atmain-street/apia-every-day-2/geo/33.64524.
316 UNESCO, “Cultural Landscapes.”

133
sacred sites of the Tongva/Gabrielino peoples around the Los Angeles Basin to the
Spanish colonial missions and ranchos that shaped Southern California’s early
agricultural development.
These perspectives on landscape aesthetics and cultural landscapes illuminate
how landscapes are fundamentally imbued with and shaped by power dynamics. The
aesthetic decisions and cultural narratives embedded in landscapes often reflect the
ideologies of dominant groups, whether through colonialism, imperialism, or urban
development, projecting their power onto the physical environment.317 This is evident in
the case of APIA ethnic enclaves in the United States, which were initially formed as a
result of legal segregation and discriminatory laws.318 However, landscapes
simultaneously function as sites of contestation and resistance where various groups
interact, interpret, and challenge these dominant narratives,319 as seen in how historic
APIA neighborhoods like Little Tokyo, Little Saigon, and various Chinese enclaves
across Los Angeles have evolved to serve as crucial cultural spaces and stepping stones
for new immigrants.320 This ongoing negotiation of meaning and form-finding creates
complex, layered cultural landscapes where multiple perspectives and memories coexist,
revealing the intricate relationship between space, power, and social dynamics.321
Understanding landscapes through this lens emphasizes their role not merely as
physical entities, but as dynamic expressions of societal values, power structures, and
cultural identities.322 This approach is significant when examining APIA heritage in Los
317 Tiffany Kaewen Dang, “Decolonizing Landscape,” Landscape Research 46 (July 2021): 1004–16,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1935820.
318 Tuan, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. 319 Eric Avila and Thaïsa Way, eds., Segregation and Resistance in the Landscapes of the Americas
(Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of Landscape Architecture, 2023).
320 Liu and Geron, “Changing Neighborhood: Ethnic Enclaves and the Struggle for Social Justice.”
321 This complexity is visible in the emergence of new APIA enclaves in American suburbs, such as Irvine,
Arcadia, and Monterey Park, which represent both a response to displacement from traditional ethnic
neighborhoods and the creation of new cultural spaces that serve both APIA communities and broader
audiences.
322 Jacque Micieli-Voutsinas and Angela M. Person, Affective Architectures, 1st ed. (Routledge, 2020).

134
Angeles, where the cultural landscape has been profoundly shaped by complex historical
processes, including immigration patterns, discriminatory policies, and community
resilience. The evolution of neighborhoods such as Little Tokyo, Chinatown, and
Historic Filipinotown exemplifies how APIA communities have both navigated and
resisted dominant power structures while creating distinct cultural spaces within the
urban fabric—spaces that serve as physical manifestation of counter-memory.
The recognition of these power dynamics in landscape formation and
interpretation adds another dimension to the application of digital technologies in
landscape architecture and heritage conservation. AI-assisted counter-mapping, the
practice of creating maps that challenge dominant Western cartography by
incorporating alternative cultural knowledge and relationships to land, can visualize
patterns of displacement and demographic change over time, revealing how
gentrification and urban renewal have impacted APIA neighborhoods.323 As
practitioners employ advanced visualization tools and genAI-assisted techniques, they
must critically consider how these technologies can either perpetuate existing power
structures or challenge dominant narratives embedded in landscapes. This awareness
becomes essential when recreating historic APIA sites or envisioning future landscapes
that respectfully represent and celebrate APIA heritage.
The concept of landscapes as sites of contestation and negotiation manifests in
multiple dimensions of urban space and social interaction. As evident in APIA
neighborhoods, gentrification exemplifies how changes in the landscape can create
ideological and psychological divides, leading to inequality and loss of cultural heritage.
This process affects not only the immediate neighborhood but also transforms the social
dynamics of the city and county, emphasizing the interconnected nature of urban spaces
323 Nancy Lee Peluso, “Whose Woods Are These? Counter‐Mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan,
Indonesia,” The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, (April 2011):
422–29, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch55.

135
and communities. The imbalance created by new visions of placemaking ripples across
the region, resulting in significant losses through gentrification—displacing individuals
and families, eroding cultures and traditions, erasing memories and lived experiences,
losing tacit knowledge, and altering the very energy and pace that defined these
neighborhoods.
The intersection of physical and digital landscapes creates new opportunities for
resistance and preservation. For APIA spaces, this means not only preserving physical
landscapes but also documenting and sharing the “blocks of historical knowledge” that
might otherwise be lost through institutional neglect.324 This dual approach—preserving
physical spaces while creating digital counter-memories—enhances the potential to
create counter-narratives, counter-maps, and alternative imageries. By leveraging these
digital tools with a critical understanding of power dynamics, landscape architects and
heritage conservationists can amplify historically marginalized APIA perspectives and
create more inclusive representations of cultural landscapes. This approach is promising
for APIA communities in Los Angeles, where traditional historic narratives have
systematically overlooked or misrepresented their contributions, struggles, and lived
experiences.
GENERATIVE SYNESTHESIA
The concept of generative synesthesia presents a promising approach to
landscape architecture and heritage conservation. This approach represents a paradigm
shift where human creativity manifests primarily through ideation and curation rather
than technical execution.325 Users engage in prompt engineering326—the technique of
refining text instructions to guide AI systems toward desired outputs—by deconstructing
324 Molden, “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power Relations of Collective
Memory.”
325 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”
326 Coursera, “What Is Prompt Engineering? Definition and Examples,” Coursera, published October 2023,
https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-prompt-engineering. Refer to Appendix 3 for example.

136
concepts into specific words and phrases that guide AI image generation, then carefully
filter the outputs based on coherence and quality.327
In landscape architecture and heritage conservation, APIA designers, artists,
historians, and storytellers could use this process to visualize lost cultural landscapes.
They first break down historic descriptions or memories into detailed prompts (e.g.,
architectural styles, natural features, location, cultural elements), create multiple AIgenerated image variations, and then curate the output to ensure accurate and respectful
representation of community. Such digital reconstructions create counter-memories that
challenge dominant historical narratives.
Zhou and Lee’s research emphasizes ideation and filtering skills over technology
competency and artistic ability, highlighting how these AI tools can broaden
participation in creative work. This shift enables diverse APIA community members to
preserve and share their heritage through visual storytelling, even without traditional
artistic training. The process allows creators to focus on the conceptual and cultural
significance of what they want to represent, while leveraging genAI to handle technical
execution. By reducing technical barriers, these tools expand opportunities for APIA
community members to contribute to the visual narrative of their heritage in Los
Angeles.
327 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”

137

Fig. 4.4: (top left) AI-generated reimagining of Pachappa Camp, Riverside, California, illustrating a
hypothetical evolution of the first Koreatown in the United States. The image explores how the urban
landscape might have transformed over time under different circumstances. (Generated by Copilot Studio,
December 5, 2024, https://chatgpt.com). Prompt: ‘Pachappa Camp in Riverside, known as the first
Koreatown in the U.S., exploring speculative artworks depicting alternative urban development scenarios,
showing changes to the landscape over time.’
Fig. 4.5: (top right) Variation using Stable Diffusion XL. (Stable Diffusion-XL, December 5, 2024,
https://chatgpt.com). Prompt: ‘Pachappa Camp in Riverside, known as the first Koreatown in the U.S.,
exploring speculative artworks depicting alternative urban development scenarios, showing changes to the
landscape over time.’
Fig. 4.6: (bottom) Variation using Stable Diffusion XL, 16:9 ratio. (Generated by DALL-E3, December 5,
2024, https://chatgpt.com). Prompt: ‘Pachappa Camp in Riverside, known as the first Koreatown in the
U.S., exploring speculative artworks depicting alternative urban development scenarios, showing changes
to the landscape over time.’

138
Practical applications of the concept include using genAI to recreate lost APIA sites, like
the original location of Chinatown or Pachappa Camp in Riverside (known as the first
Koreatown in the U.S.); exploring speculative artworks depicting alternative urban
development scenarios; analyzing changes to the landscape over time; visualizing
intangible aspects of APIA culture; and creating interactive heritage experiences that
overlay historic APIA presences onto contemporary Los Angeles landscapes.
Fig. 4.7: 3D reconstruction of Bunker Hill neighborhood, featuring 256 South Bunker Hill. (Screenshot
from Bunker Hill Refrain project, 2024, based on historical photographs from USC Libraries Special
Collections, Huntington Library, Los Angeles Public Library, Getty, WPA architectural drawings [1939],
Sanborn maps, and 1941 aerial photography. https://bunkerhillrefrain.org).
Fig. 4.8: Voxel synthesis and completion from satellite imagery. (Screenshot from InfiniCity project
demonstrating octree-based voxel completion process at 64³ resolution. Published in Chieh Hubert Lin,
“InfiniCity: Infinite-Scale City Synthesis,” 2023, https://hubert0527.github.io/infinicity/). The voxel
synthesis process demonstrates the pipeline from 2D satellite imagery to complete 3D urban structures
through octree-based completion.

139
Two noteworthy projects demonstrate different approaches to recreating lost
urban landscapes. The Bunker Hill Refrain328 project, led by Meredith Drake Reitan at
USC, demonstrates traditional digital methods by creating an immersive representation
of Los Angeles’ Bunker Hill neighborhood before its demolition. While this project does
not explicitly utilize genAI, its methodology could be enhanced through genAI
techniques to produce more detailed visualizations and multiple interpretations of the
neighborhood and cultural landscape elements. In contrast, InfiniCity329 showcases the
full potential of AI-powered tools through its 3D city synthesis, created entirely using
generative design. Together, these projects demonstrate the potential for applying
genAI techniques to recreate historic urban landscapes while offering valuable
methodologies that could be adapted for visualizing lost APIA sites such as the Japanese
Fishing Village in Terminal Island or Little Manila in downtown Los Angeles.
RECLAIMING NARRATIVES: GENAI AS COMMUNITY TOOL
For APIA communities, genAI’s accessibility breaks down traditional barriers in
the design process, enabling community members without technical skills to participate
in creating visual counter-memories. The technology offers various applications for
preserving and amplifying APIA narratives: incorporating culturally specific elements
into prompts, generating multilingual visual materials to bridge language barriers,
creating rapid prototypes of design concepts for community feedback, and visualizing
historic appearances of APIA heritage sites. This technological democratization could
lead to more authentic and diverse representations of APIA experiences in Los Angeles’
cultural landscape, challenging traditional historical narratives while fostering
community-driven preservation efforts.
328 Bunker Hill Refrain, “Bunker Hill Refrain,” Bunkerhillrefrain.org, published 2024,
https://bunkerhillrefrain.org.
329 Chieh Hubert Lin et al., “InfiniCity: Infinite-Scale City Synthesis,” arXiv (Cornell University), August
2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.09637.

140
The 2022 vision plan for the Cambodian American Cultural Center of Long
Beach, California by City Fabrick offers an ideal opportunity to explore how genAI and
the concept of generative synesthesia could enhance community engagement in cultural
heritage projects, particularly for APIA communities, while addressing landscape
aesthetics and cultural landscape principles. Using this project as an example, we could
examine how genAI tools could augment existing engagement strategies, including
advisory committee meetings, community leader consultations, public surveys, focus
groups, and cultural events, to create more inclusive visual counter-memories. 330
During community roundtables, a text-to-image genAI chatbot could generate
immediate visual representations of community-proposed ideas for the center’s
architecture and landscape design. This real-time visualization could facilitate more
nuanced and culturally authentic design concepts. In terms of landscape aesthetics,
genAI could incorporate traditional Cambodian design elements while contextualizing
the center within Long Beach’s broader APIA heritage, visualizing its potential
influence on surrounding areas over time. This approach would enable community
members to evaluate the visual impact of different design choices, helping the final
design create both a functional and a culturally resonant space. 331
GenAI could also facilitate the creation of virtual tours showing proposed layouts,
allowing community members to experience various design options and provide
informed feedback. This capability proves particularly valuable for visualizing
circulation patterns and assessing how the center could serve as a hub for Cambodian
American culture while remaining welcoming to the broader community. From a
cultural landscape perspective, genAI could generate visualizations demonstrating the
center’s potential influence on its surroundings over time, such as the evolution of
330 City Fabrick, “CF Projects,” Cityfabrick.org, updated 2024, https://www.cityfabrick.org/projectcollection.
331 City Fabrick, “CF Projects.”

141
Southeast Asian diaspora presence through Cambodian-owned businesses or the
transformation of streetscapes during traditional festivals. This approach helps
stakeholders understand the center not as a static monument but as part of a living,
evolving cultural landscape.

Fig. 4.9: Two AI-generated conceptual design of the Cambodian American Cultural Center in Long
Beach, California. (Generated by DALL-E 3, October 17, 2024, https://chatgpt.com). Prompt: ‘generate an
image of Cambodian American Cultural Center in Long Beach, CA focusing on Khmer-inspired
aesthetics and modern functionality.’
While genAI can enhance the process of creating counter-memories, it should
not supersede human creativity and nuanced understanding of cultural contexts. The
genAI technology must remain accessible to community members with limited digital
literacy. As Zhou and Lee’s study indicates, the risk of visual homogenization through
genAI necessitates careful attention to maintaining diverse visual representations that
accurately reflect APIA cultural richness.332 Additionally, the use of genAI in public
planning processes raises ethical considerations regarding data privacy, consent, and
potential bias in AI-generated designs. Through thoughtful integration of genAI tools in
community engagement processes, designers, planners, and preservationists could
332 Zhou and Lee, “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and Art.”

142
achieve more inclusive, efficient, and culturally sensitive outcomes in projects related to
APIA heritage and urban development in Los Angeles.333
GEOLOCATED SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS USING GENAI
Building on the discussion of power, place, and genAI-assisted visualization in
landscape architecture and heritage conservation, Langemeyer, Calcagni, and Baró’s
research on “Mapping the Intangible: Using Geolocated Social Media Data to Examine
Landscape Aesthetics” offers innovative approaches for creating APIA countermemories in Los Angeles. This framework could be adapted to better understand and
represent the aesthetic value of APIA cultural landscapes, potentially uncovering
suppressed narratives and challenging dominant perceptions of urban aesthetics.334
The study makes an important distinction between landscape aesthetics (LA)
capacity and flow. LA-capacity refers to the inherent aesthetic potential “determined by
biophysical landscape and its features,” while LA-flow represents people’s “realization of
benefits through the appreciation of a landscape.”335 This framework revealed interesting
patterns in Barcelona, where areas of high LA-capacity did not always correspond to
high LA-flow. For example, while many inland hilly agro-forestry landscapes had
significant aesthetic potential, they experienced relatively low LA-flow, most likely due
to limited accessibility. In contrast, urban and peri-urban areas showed relatively high
LA-flow despite more modest LA-capacity scores from experts, suggesting that built
infrastructure can enhance rather than detract from aesthetic appreciation.336
This distinction proves valuable in examining APIA cultural landscapes in
Greater Los Angeles, considering both physical characteristics and lived experiences. By
separating potential from realized aesthetic value, this approach could reveal
333 City Fabrick, “CF Projects.”
334 Mapping Land Use. 335 Mapping Land Use. 336 Mapping Land Use

143
discrepancies between the intrinsic significance of APIA heritage sites and their public
recognition or appreciation.337 The study found that areas combining multiple landscape
elements, including both natural and built features, tended to generate the highest LAflow, challenging assumptions that “pristine” or “natural” landscapes are inherently
more aesthetically valuable. The findings in this study could prove valuable for
understanding disconnects between expert assessments of landscape value and actual
patterns of public appreciation and use.
Their methodology combines expert evaluations for LA-capacity with social
media analysis for LA-flow, using Flickr photo sharing platforms. The researchers
analyzed 13,460 geolocated photographs from Flickr uploaded in 2015, coding them for
landscape features to assess actual aesthetic appreciation patterns. This approach could
be adapted for mapping both potential and actual aesthetic appreciation of APIA
heritage sites in Los Angeles. Analyzing geolocation and other metadata from social
media platforms could uncover how these landscapes are perceived and valued by both
community members and visitors, potentially revealing overlooked narratives and
perspectives. When combined with genAI tools, this method could enable the
generation and analysis of counter-memories based on community-generated social
media data.
A key finding revealed that “LA-flow seems less dependent on ‘pristine nature’
than experts and planners assume, while the complex integration of green and grey
landscape features plays a critical role.”338 The comparison of capacity versus flow
demonstrated alignment in areas close to population centers and transport networks but
revealed mismatches in regions with poor transportation access and lower population
density. For example, distant inland locations with limited public transport showed low
337 Mapping Land Use. 338 Mapping Land Use, 542.

144
LA-flow despite high LA-capacity scores.339 These findings have significant implications
for understanding and preserving APIA cultural landscapes in Los Angeles, particularly
in urban and peri-urban areas where the integration of natural and built environments
shapes aesthetic appreciation and cultural memory.
Fig. 4.10: Visualization of the landscape aesthetic flow in the Province of Barcelona, Spain. (From
Johannes Langemeyer, Fulvia Calcagni, and Francesc Baró, “Mapping the Intangible: Using Geolocated
Social Media Data to Examine Landscape Aesthetics,” Land Use Policy 77 [September 2018]: 542–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049). Diagram based on the sum of geolocated photographs at
the pixel level (2.5 × 2.5 km). The map illustrates the spatial distribution and intensity of landscape
aesthetics as captured by social media data.
339 Mapping Land Use.

145
The study’s policy implications emphasize focusing on “urban and peri-urban
landscapes as key landscape aesthetics providers.”340 For APIA communities in Los
Angeles, this could translate into policies that preserve and enhance the aesthetic value
of culturally significant urban spaces like Little Tokyo, Little Saigon, and Little India,
where cultural heritage from countries of origin blends with Asian American
adaptations to create distinctive aesthetic experiences. The revealed “substantial
mismatch between landscape aesthetics capacity and flow” highlights how accessibility
influences LA experiences, prompting considerations of how visible and accessible APIA
cultural landscapes are within Los Angeles.341
Fig. 4.11: Figure 10. Comparative analysis of landscape aesthetic capacity (LA-capacity) and landscape
aesthetic flow (LA-flow) in the Province of Barcelona, Spain, using natural breaks classification.
(Langemeyer, Calcagni, and Baró, “Mapping the Intangible,” Land Use Policy 77 [September 2018]: 542–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049).
This insight addresses issues of representation and power in urban spaces while
supporting the preservation of built heritage in APIA neighborhoods. For instance, just
as the study found expert evaluations often undervalue built infrastructure’s aesthetic
contribution, conventional preservation frameworks might overlook how APIA
340 Mapping Land Use. 341 Mapping Land Use.

146
neighborhoods meaningfully combine cultural elements with urban infrastructure. Long
Beach’s Cambodia Town,342 designated in 2007, offers an example of how conventional
preservation frameworks might overlook meaningful cultural-urban combinations. The
corridor along Anaheim Street between Atlantic and Junipero Avenues features
Buddhist temples adapted from converted commercial buildings, demonstrating how
Cambodian Americans transformed existing urban structures to serve cultural needs.
The area includes markets, restaurants, and family-owned businesses that modified postwar commercial architecture with cultural design elements like traditional colors,
scripts, and architectural details while maintaining the original building footprint.343
Fig. 4.12: Screenshot from Google Maps. (Google Maps, Accessed October 12, 2024). Street View depicting
Cambodia Town in Long Beach, California, on East Anaheim Street facing west, with Gundry Avenue as
the cross street. The image shows the urban landscape and architectural features of the Cambodian
American community in Long Beach.
Conventional preservation frameworks might focus on architectural period of
significance or “authenticity,” missing how these hybrid spaces represent important
cultural adaptations, interethnic collaboration with Hispanic, Black, and other Southeast
342 Cambodia Town Inc., “History,” Cambodia Town, Accessed July 14, 2024,
https://cambodiatown.org/history/.
343 Cambodia Town Inc., “History.”

147
Asian populations,344 and placekeeping efforts—community-led preservation of both
physical spaces and cultural heritage—to counter growing gentrification pressures.345
The LA value comes not from pristine preservation of either American architecture or
traditional Cambodian design but from the community’s active creation of countermemories through their adaptive reuse of urban spaces, creating a distinctive APIA
landscape that challenges conventional narratives about both American urban
development and Cambodian cultural preservation.
As Langemeyer, Calcagni, and Baró note, this could help in “democratizing
creativity” and provide “valuable insights into the evolving landscape of artistic creation
in the age of AI.”346 By adapting this approach to Los Angeles and incorporating genAI
tools, researchers must carefully consider both the opportunities and limitations in
creating more inclusive representations of aesthetic value in APIA cultural landscapes.
While genAI and social media data analysis may inform preservation efforts and
challenge dominant urban aesthetic narratives, these technologies can also perpetuate
existing biases or oversimplify complex cultural histories. The integration of expert
knowledge, community preferences revealed through social media data, and genAIassisted visualization should serve as complementary tools rather than primary methods
for mapping, understanding, and preserving intangible aspects of APIA cultural
heritage. This approach, when combined with traditional documentation methods, oral
histories, and direct community engagement, could open new possibilities for
representing and reimagining urban spaces in ways that reflect the complexity and
diversity of the APIA communities in the region while remaining mindful of
technological limitations and potential biases.
344 Cambodia Town Thrives, “History,” Cambodia Town Thrives, Accessed July 17, 2024,
https://www.cambodiatownthrives.org/history.
345 Brandon Soun and Lan Nguyen, Cambodia Town: Not For Sale, vimeo, June 20, 2019,
https://vimeo.com/343563776.
346 Mapping Land Use.

148
APPLICATION: APIA HERITAGE
Applying the landscape aesthetics (LA) assessment approach to Greater Los
Angeles, with its varied topographic conditions including beaches, mountains, urban
sprawl, and nearby deserts, presents a complex landscape for analysis. The methodology
used in Langemeyer’s Barcelona Province study could be adapted to assess both LAcapacity and flow in Los Angeles, with genAI enhancing this process.347 Specifically,
applying the LA approach to APIA communities could provide critical insights into
cultural preferences, community values, and aesthetic qualities that have historically
been overlooked or misrepresented.
For APIA neighborhoods, the LA-capacity assessment must consider culturally
specific landscape features. These include traditional architecture, public art
installations, cultural landmarks, and green spaces designed with APIA-inspired
aesthetics. For example, comparing the Japanese garden in Little Tokyo’s James Irvine
Garden, also referred to as Seiryu-en,348 with other Japanese-inspired gardens in Greater
Los Angeles reveals complex patterns of cultural representation and adaptation.349
Designed by Takeo Uesugi in 1979 as part of the Japanese American Cultural and
Community Center, this 8,500-square-foot garden received the National Landscape
Award in 1981. Unlike gardens created as private estates or tourist attractions, the James
Irvine Garden’s integration into Little Tokyo’s urban fabric creates a unique LA value
that challenges conventional ideas about Japanese gardens. Its current state—with plants
growing naturally over pathways and less manicured appearance—raises questions about
authenticity, maintenance, and changing community needs.350 While dominant
narratives about Japanese gardens emphasize meticulous maintenance and picture347 Mapping Land Use. 348 “Garden of the Clear Stream”
349 Storrier Stearns Japanese Garden in Pasadena, Descanso Gardens in La Cañada Flintridge, or South
Coast Botanic Garden in Rancho Palos Verdes,
350 Discover Nikkei, “James Irvine Garden,” Discovernikkei.org, published 2021,
https://discovernikkei.org/en/nikkeialbum/albums/58/.

149
perfect presentations, as seen at Storrier Stearns in Pasadena or Descanso Gardens in La
Cañada Flintridge, the James Irvine Garden’s more natural aesthetic may better reflect
its role as a living community space rather than a curated display.
While genAI could assist in analyzing satellite imagery and street view data to
identify these culturally specific features, it is crucial to acknowledge potential biases in
AI training datasets that might perpetuate Orientalist or colonial perspectives of Asian
architectural styles and cultural landmarks. To mitigate these issues and incorporate
counter-memories, the output data should be refined through a structured review
process involving landscape architects, community members, cultural historians, and
heritage conservation professionals. Drawing from the Barcelona Province study
methodology, this review process should include expert validation of architectural or
landscape features against both official historic records and historically marginalized
community accounts, verification of cultural significance and context from multiple
perspectives, and identification of any misclassifications or biases in the AI-assisted
analysis. This multi-stakeholder approach would combine expert assessment with local
and Indigenous knowledge to ensure accurate identification of culturally-specific
features while addressing potential biases and historic power imbalances in the AIassisted analysis.
The LA-flow assessment demands careful consideration of social media data from
platforms used within APIA communities, encompassing both mainstream platforms
(Instagram, TikTok, Facebook) and community-specific platforms (KakaoTalk, LINE,
Moj, WeChat). This analysis should examine culturally significant events and locations,
including Lunar New Year celebrations, Nisei Week in Little Tokyo, Diwali, and the
Songkran festival. Image recognition models could be fine-tuned to identify culturally
specific elements in photos, such as traditional costumes, foods, graphics, and
architectural details. While genAI could help overcome language barriers through
multilingual natural language processing, it is crucial to acknowledge that social media

150
data may not fully represent all community voices, particularly those of older
generations or individuals with limited digital access.
Fig. 4.13: A photo of the James Irvine Japanese Garden. (Photograph by Frank Fujimoto, December 29,
2015, https://flic.kr/p/CdKQcW, used under CC BY-SA 2.0). The James Irvine Japanese Garden at the
Japanese American Cultural Center in Los Angeles, California, exemplifying a more natural aesthetic
with plants growing freely over pathways and a less manicured appearance. This organic style raises
questions about authenticity, maintenance, and the garden’s role in serving the changing needs of the
community.
Fig. 4.14: A photo of the Japanese Tea House at Storrier Stearns Japanese Garden in Pasadena, California.
(Photograph by V.T. Polywoda, April 1, 2019, https://flic.kr/p/RC6tFa, used under CC BY-SA 2.0). Storrier
Stearns Japanese Garden in Pasadena, California, showcasing a meticulously maintained and curated
garden space. This museum-like presentation aligns with dominant narratives about Japanese gardens,
emphasizing their picture-perfect appearance and carefully controlled aesthetics.

151

Fig. 4.15: (left) AI-generated image of a Japanese-style garden in Los Angeles (Generated by Stable
Diffusion XL, December 5, 2024). Prompt: ‘Image of Japanese style garden in Los Angeles.’ An image
depicting a highly curated and meticulously maintained landscape with traditional Japanese-inspired
architecture. The image perpetuates dominant narratives about Japanese gardens, emphasizing their
picture-perfect presentation and carefully controlled aesthetics.
Fig. 4.16: (right) AI-generated representation of a Japanese-style garden in Los Angeles. (Generated by
Microsoft Copilot, December 5, 2024). Prompt: ‘Image of Japanese style garden in Los Angeles.’ An image
showcasing a manicured and idealized landscape featuring traditional Japanese architectural elements.
This image highlights the need for community engagement and a more nuanced understanding of
Japanese gardens in urban contexts.
The comparison between LA-capacity and flow in APIA neighborhoods could
reveal critical insights about power dynamics and cultural representation. While
traditional cultural landmarks may possess high LA-capacity, actual LA-flow might be
higher in fusion spaces that blend Asian and American aesthetics, reflecting the
complex, heterogeneous nature of APIA experiences. GenAI could visualize these
patterns, illustrating how LA-flow fluctuates during cultural festivals or differs across
generations.351 However, these visualizations must be developed in consultation with
351 This trend is already evident in marketing and customer experience, where companies leverage genAI
to analyze social media data and automatically identify business opportunities and generate new ideas. By
processing vast amounts of customer conversations, feedback, and engagement patterns, genAI systems
help organizations discover emerging trends and unmet consumer needs more rapidly and systematically
than traditional market research methods.

152
community members and grounded in a comprehensive knowledge base of APIA
history and cultural practices to ensure they accurately represent lived experiences
rather than reinforcing stereotypes.
Based on this analysis, genAI could assist in formulating policy recommendations
that prioritize the cultural and aesthetic values of APIA communities. These would
include preferences for specific architectural elements like rooflines and ornamental
details, the integration of culturally significant colors and materials, spatial
arrangements that support community use patterns and cultural practices, and the
preservation of heritage signage and storefront designs. These recommendations should
balance the preservation of traditional aesthetic elements with the creation of spaces
that reflect evolving, multicultural identities. GenAI tools could analyze successful
strategies from other diverse cities with significant Asian populations, such as
Vancouver, B.C., and San Francisco, to suggest adaptations for Los Angeles.
Additionally, these tools could simulate how various policy interventions might affect
the landscape aesthetics in these neighborhoods, accounting for demographic trends and
community feedback.
Ongoing monitoring of landscape aesthetics in APIA neighborhoods could track
changes in cultural and aesthetic values over time, particularly in response to
demographic shifts, new developments, and cultural events.352 While digital data
collection is valuable, monitoring must incorporate community-based documentation
methods to capture diverse perspectives and experiences. By centering APIA
communities and their narratives, these approaches could help Los Angeles develop
more nuanced and culturally responsive strategies for preserving and enhancing
landscape aesthetics. This monitoring could alert local policymakers to emerging trends,
352 Lisa Harkness et al., “How Generative AI Can Boost Consumer Marketing | McKinsey,” McKinsey &
Company, December 2023, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/ourinsights/how-generative-ai-can-boost-consumer-marketing.

153
such as growing appreciation for specific types of public spaces or concerns about the
loss of traditional aesthetic elements.
This framework provides opportunities for creating and preserving countermemories within APIA communities, helping to facilitate planning decisions that not
only maintain these neighborhoods’ unique character but also support their evolution in
ways that authentically reflect the dynamic nature of APIA identities and experiences.
CASE STUDY: PLANNING AND DESIGN
Li and Amoroso’s 2023 study, “An Early Look at Applications for Artificial
Intelligence Visualization Software in Landscape Architecture,” examines genAIassisted visualization software in landscape architecture and provides valuable insights
into their potential for representing culturally significant landscapes and heritage sites.353
The research compares traditional Adobe-based rendering techniques with two AIgenerated approaches: text-based image generation (DALL-E 2) and sketch-based image
refinement (NVIDIA GauGAN2).
The research revealed significant efficiency gains with genAI-assisted methods,
with DALL-E 2 producing images in minutes compared to the hours required for
conventional rendering methods. Through a survey of landscape architecture
professionals and comparative experiments, including the recreation of a shoreline dune
landscape, the researchers examined two key questions: whether genAI tools could
effectively visualize designed landscapes as an alternative to conventional rendering
methods, and whether genAI visualization methods could surpass the effectiveness and
efficiency of Adobe-based Photoshop digital collaging. While the speed advantages were
clear, the survey results raised important questions about the ability of genAI tools to
353 Marika Li and Nadia Amoroso, “An Early Look at Applications for Artificial Intelligence Visualization
Software in Landscape Architecture,” Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture 2023 (2023): 543–53,
https://doi.org/10.14627/537740057.

154
capture cultural nuance and achieve the same level of visual quality as traditional
methods.354
Fig. 4.17: Comparison of a semi-realistic rendering of a shoreline dune landscape produced in Photoshop.
(From Marika Li and Nadia Amoroso, “An Early Look at Applications for Artificial Intelligence
Visualization Software in Landscape Architecture,” Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture 2023, no. 8
[2023]: 543–53, https://doi.org/10.14627/537740057). Images by Nadia Amoroso Studio for Brook/McIlroy
Architects (A) with attempts to reproduce the same scene using AI-powered tools GauGAN2 (B) and
DALL-E 2 (C). This study explores the potential applications and limitations of artificial intelligence
visualization software in landscape architecture.
These limitations have particular relevance for representing APIA contexts in
several ways. The genAI systems struggled with accurately depicting specific plant
species, which could impact visualization of culturally significant flora. For example,
genAI struggled to distinguish between varieties of native plants or accurately represent
354 Two larger questions: “Can artificial intelligence software be used to visualize designed landscapes as an
alternative to current rendering methods?” and “Are AI visualizing methods more effective and efficient
than current Photoshop digital collaging?”

155
traditional herbs and culturally important flora that might be essential elements in APIA
heritage sites.355 GenAI also had difficulty integrating realistic human figures, potentially
affecting representation of cultural practices and gatherings. When considered alongside
Lin et al.’s 2023 “InfiniCity” research, these findings suggest current genAI systems face
substantial challenges in representing the complex cultural and environmental elements
embedded in urban spaces.356.
Despite current limitations, the rapid evolution of genAI technology suggests
promising future applications for preserving and visualizing APIA counter-memories.
As these tools become more sophisticated in recognizing and representing cultural and
environmental elements, they could become valuable assets for community-driven
design processes, helping ensure urban development projects better reflect and respect
APIA cultural heritage and lived experiences.
355 Li and Amoroso, “An Early Look at Applications for Artificial Intelligence Visualization Software in
Landscape Architecture.”
356 Patrick Sisson, “What It Looks Like When AI Designs a City,” Bloomberg, September 16, 2023,
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-09-16/ai-invades-urban-planning-and-design-with-mixedresults.

156
Fig. 4.18: AI-generated landscape images depicting a scene in summer (top) and winter (bottom), created
using NVIDIA Canvas (v 1.4). (Created by author, December 1, 2024). The images were automatically
generated by the application for use in 3D rendering settings, resulting in noticeable distortion. The
seasonal variations can be adjusted by clicking an icon within the app. The total time to generate both
images took less than a minute.

157
APPLICATION 2: PRODUCTION OF COUNTER-MEMORIES
The applications of genAI-assisted visualization in landscape architecture offer
innovative approaches to preserving counter-memories of APIA communities in Los
Angeles. Li and Amoroso’s study demonstrates how genAI tools can rapidly produce
visual representations, suggesting potential applications for documenting erased or
overlooked APIA sites and communities. This capability aligns with counter-memory’s
role in challenging dominant historical narratives by elevating marginalized
perspectives.357 For instance, genAI visualization tools could generate multiple historic
views of Historic Filipinotown, providing visual documentation of its transformation
through pre- and post-gentrification periods.
These studies suggest that genAI’s strength in ideation and concept development
could prove valuable for brainstorming visual representations of APIA histories and
counter-memories. This could provide inspiration for artists, historians, and community
members, much as landscape architects use genAI for initial design concepts. However,
current limitations in handling specific concepts indicate that while genAI may excel at
creating general scenes of APIA life, it may struggle with historically accurate details or
specific cultural elements, particularly when representing the nuanced cultural heritage
of diverse APIA communities, such as Los Angeles’ Chinatown architecture or block
typologies of Little Tokyo.
Li and Amoroso’s proposed hybrid human-AI approach could address these
limitations through thoughtful application of community participation models. GenAI
could produce initial images of lost or underrepresented APIA spaces, which community
members and heritage conservation professionals could then refine for accuracy. The
approach could be carefully selected from Heather Fraser’s “Four Different Approaches
to Community Participation” framework: anti-/reluctant communitarians who prioritize
357 Foucault, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews.

158
individual rights over collective action; technical-functionalists who focus on expertdriven solutions; progressives who emphasize inclusive dialogue and mutual
understanding; or radical/activists who advocate for fundamental systemic change.358
The progressive model, with its emphasis on meaningful community dialogue and
shared decision-making, could be particularly suitable for APIA heritage visualization
projects. For instance, AI-generated images of a former Japanese American
neighborhood in Boyle Heights could be collaboratively reviewed and refined by former
residents or their descendants, ensuring cultural and historic authenticity while fostering
community engagement in the preservation process.
Fig. 4.19: AI-generated portrait simulating a Terminal Island resident. (Created using Perchance,
November 18, 2024. https://www.perchance.org/welcome). Prompt: ‘image of a former resident of terminal
island in san pedro California.” While attempting to visualize a former Terminal Island resident, the
genAI’s limitations become evident in its handling of human anatomical features, particularly in the
unnatural rendering of the hand and facial details.
358 Heather Fraser, “Four Different Approaches to Community Participation,” Community Development
Journal 40 (February 2005): 286–300, https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi037.

159
The accessibility of genAI tools could democratize visual counter-memory
creation, particularly benefiting community members without traditional artistic skills.
This democratization is crucial within the APIA community, where internal power
structures can silence certain voices, especially women.359 Empowering diverse
individuals to create counter-memories using genAI can challenge both mainstream
stereotypes and dominant narratives within the APIA community, fostering more
nuanced representation of APIA experiences.360 However, current limitations in
depicting realistic humans and cultural elements necessitate careful prompt engineering
and post-generation editing for respectful and accurate representation.
Despite these challenges, genAI offers novel ways to visualize and reimagine lost
or hypothetical APIA spaces. It could create speculative visualizations of Little Manila’s
possible present-day appearance had it not been displaced by 1950s civic development.
The technology could generate multiple interpretations of historic events, such as the
1871 Chinese Massacre or Terminal Island’s erasure, offering diverse visual perspectives
on these overlooked historical chapters. However, as Spennemann notes, using genAI
for historical or cultural representations demands careful consideration of ethical
implications, particularly regarding accuracy and respectful portrayal.361
While genAI presents exciting possibilities for creating visual counter-memories
of APIA communities, it also risks perpetuating existing biases and misrepresentations.
These models are trained on available media and historical records—which often reflect
dominant narratives and societal biases—and they can reproduce and amplify these
prejudices in their outputs.362 This limitation is particularly relevant when dealing with
marginalized communities whose histories have been systematically misrepresented or
359 Lydia HaRim Ahn et al., “Second-Generation Asian American Women’s Gendered Racial
Socialization,” Journal of Counseling Psychology 69 (July 2021): 129–45, https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000575.
360 Ahn et al., “Second-Generation Asian American Women’s Gendered Racial Socialization.”
361 Mapping Land Use. 362 Nicoletti and Bass, “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even Worse.”

160
erased.363 Therefore, their most effective use requires not only a thoughtful integration
of technological capabilities, human expertise, and community input, but also a critical
awareness of potential biases and active measures to counteract them. This careful
approach can help the technology serve as a tool for empowerment and preservation
rather than reinforcing existing stereotypes or perpetuating historical inaccuracies about
APIA experiences and histories.
COMMUNITY-INFORMED GENAI PROCESS FOR VISUALIZATION
The proposed workflow demonstrates a cyclical, community-centered approach
to generating cultural heritage visualizations. The process begins with community
consultation sessions where historical documentation, oral histories, archival
photographs, and other historic materials are gathered and digitized. These materials
form the foundation for creating detailed prompts for genAI that specify architectural
styles, cultural elements, historical accuracy requirements, and other aspects of the
cultural landscape. Community members, particularly elders and cultural bearers, review
and refine these prompts before generation.
The next phase involves iterative genAI creation using platforms like DALL-E3,
Copilot, or Midjourney. Initial outputs undergo a three-step verification process:
1. Technical review by preservation specialists to assess architectural accuracy.
2. Cultural review by community representatives to validate cultural elements
against community knowledge and traditions.
3. Historical review comparing outputs against archival records.
This process creates a feedback loop where insights from each review stage inform
prompt refinement, progressively improving output accuracy.
363 Friis and Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI.”

161
The workflow incorporates specific checkpoints for community intervention. For
instance, when visualizing Historic Filipinotown’s past streetscapes, community
members might identify missing elements like specific storefront signage or cultural
gatherings that the AI initially overlooked. These corrections are documented in a
growing knowledge base that informs future prompts, creating an evolving set of
community-verified parameters for AI generation. The final stage involves collaborative
curation where community members select which visualizations best represent their
collective memory, ensuring the final outputs align with community-held understanding
of their heritage.
This systematic approach balances technological capabilities with community
expertise, creating a reproducible framework for other APIA communities seeking to
preserve their heritage through genAI visualization. The workflow emphasizes that
while genAI can be used as a powerful tool, community knowledge remains the
authoritative source for cultural representation.
APIA HERITAGE IN THE DIGITAL AGE: BALANCING TECHNOLOGY
AND COMMUNITY
The growing prominence of genAI in landscape architecture and heritage
conservation demands critical engagement with both technological advancements and
ethical considerations. As APIA heritage sites and narratives become increasingly
vulnerable, there is an urgent need for innovative conservation strategies and decisive
action. The development of informed, ethically grounded genAI-enabled conservation
practices must prioritize preserving the intrinsic value of APIA cultural heritage for
current and future generations. This requires recognizing both the technology’s
potential and its limitations, particularly its tendency to reflect and amplify existing
societal biases and dominant narratives. For instance, a genAI model trained
predominantly on mainstream American architectural styles might struggle to
accurately represent the nuanced design elements of Chamorro latte stone structures or

162
Thai Theravada Buddhist temples. Similarly, genAI visualizations of historic events risk
inadvertently perpetuating stereotypical representations if not carefully guided by
community knowledge and experience.
Moving forward, successful implementation will require balancing technological
innovation with community-driven approaches. This means establishing robust
feedback mechanisms where APIA communities actively participate in creating,
verifying, and refining AI-generated visualizations of their cultural spaces and histories.
GenAI must be positioned as a tool for empowerment rather than replacement,
fostering a balanced discourse on the role of technology in safeguarding cultural
legacies. The goal is not merely to document what was lost, but to actively support
living communities in preserving and evolving their cultural heritage on their own
terms.

163
5) CONCLUSION
The rapidly evolving technological landscape presents both challenges and
opportunities for landscape architecture and heritage conservation, requiring a critical
examination of how these tools can be equitably integrated into existing practices while
maintaining the integrity and nuanced understanding that professionals bring to these
fields. The potential democratization of design tools through genAI promises increased
community engagement and participation in the creation of cultural landscapes for
APIA communities; however, it also raises significant concerns. These include questions
about the role of professional judgment, ethical considerations in genAI-assisted
designs, and the potential loss of traditional skills and knowledge, in addition to biases
embedded in the foundation models of these genAI tools that may misrepresent APIA
experiences, spaces, and overall narratives.
The race to develop advanced artificial intelligence and artificial
superintelligence—technologies capable of matching or surpassing human cognitive
capabilities—among major “tech” companies and “Silicon Valley” players continues to
accelerate. However, critical questions remain inadequately addressed: What happens
when the technology fails? What are the consequences when technology harms
individuals, communities, or nations? Who bears responsibility and accountability? The
challenge of creating transparent policies and regulations is compounded by tech leaders
potentially concealing AI technology risks from the public, while lawmakers struggle to
address these issues without undermining the industry’s achievements.
Recent developments at OpenAI illustrate these challenges. The shift in the
organization’s stance from a nonprofit research institute to a for-profit entity, with its
nonprofit arm holding only a minority stake, raises concerns about prioritizing profit
over public benefit. While OpenAI claims this structure “allows [them] to rapidly
increase [their] investments in compute and talent while including checks and balances

164
to actualize [their] mission,” the departure of three prominent executives and criticism
from current and former employees regarding transparency and risk management
suggest deeper issues.364 With the shift from building a powerful AI with safety and
benefit for humanity as their top priority to a not-yet-known goals with profitgenerating motives, can OpenAI continue to be recognized as a public interest
organization? Can we ensure that these changes do not disproportionately affect how
APIA communities are represented and served?
CRITICAL ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
AI industry experts and insiders have been calling for more transparency
“because we urgently need to figure out how to steer and control AI systems much
smarter than us.”365 Three prominent executives departed OpenAI in less than a year.366
This adds to the list of criticisms from both current and former employees regarding
transparency around employee relations, the risks posed by AI such as singularity, and
whistleblower protection.367 The unfinalized state of OpenAI’s transformation—its
undisclosed new mission, uncertain governance restructuring, and the potential ripple
effects of its strategic pivot—has raised concerns among many observers, particularly
given the technology industry’s consistent failure to balance societal benefit with
shareholder interests and demands.368
The tech industry’s “move fast and break things” philosophy, popularized by
Mark Zuckerberg, prioritizes rapid development and market penetration over careful
364 OpenAI, “OpenAI LP,” OpenAI, published March 2019, https://openai.com/index/openai-lp/.
365 Jan Leike, “X.Com,” X (formerly Twitter, posted May 17, 2024),
https://x.com/janleike/status/1791498177327341609.
366 Clare Duffy, “Three More Execs out at OpenAI, Including Technology Chief Mira Murati,” CNN,
September 25, 2024, https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/25/tech/openai-technology-chief-mira-muratileaving/index.html.
367 Samantha Murphy Kelly, “OpenAI Insiders’ Open Letter Warns of ‘Serious Risks’ and Calls for
Whistleblower Protections” CNN, June 4, 2024, https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/tech/openai-insidersletter/index.html.
368 Companies such as Salesforce, Google, Meta, and Microsoft

165
consideration of consequences.369 This approach has led to recurring issues of technoauthoritarianism, “tech-bro” culture, and monopolies, largely stemming from lack of
accountability.370 For APIA communities, who have long been subjected to technoOrientalist stereotypes and biases in technological development, these challenges echo
Octavia Butler’s warnings about unintended consequences and underscore the
importance of learning from past regulatory failures. In fact, the reality of this mindset
of “not playing by the rules” has led to the inability of lawmakers to draft appropriate
policies and regulations in a timely manner to protect users.371
As more professionals from the AI industry warn the public about the dangers of
rapid advancement while calling for increased transparency, vigilance in addressing
issues of bias, representation, and accessibility remains paramount.372 By prioritizing
these concerns, the development of ethical, inclusive genAI systems can be fostered,
enabling the utilization of various AI-assisted capabilities to create, preserve, and
amplify a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of APIA communities and the
shared history of people in Los Angeles. GenAI could help surface and amplify
historically marginalized stories, contributing to a more inclusive and accurate
representation of Los Angeles’ cultural landscape.
IMPLICATIONS FOR QUANTUM BREAKTHROUGH
Google’s recent breakthrough in quantum computing, announced in December
2024, underscores the accelerating pace of technological advancement.373 Their Willow
369 Griffith, “Silicon Valley Slides Back into ‘Bro’ Culture.”
370 Jonathan Taplin, “Move Fast and Break Things? Not Again, and Not with AI,” The Hill, September 22,
2024, https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4891654-move-fast-and-break-things-not-again-and-not-withai/.
371 Jason Steinhauer, History, Disrupted : How Social Media and the World Wide Web Have Changed the
Past, 1st ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022).
372 Kelly, “OpenAI Insiders’ Open Letter Warns of ‘Serious Risks’ and Calls for Whistleblower
Protections.”
373 Cade Metz, “Google Makes New Quantum Computing Breakthrough,” The New York Times, December
9, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/technology/google-quantum-computing.html.

166
chip-based quantum computer performed in under five minutes what would take
traditional supercomputers ten septillion years—longer than the universe’s age.374 While
this achievement points to future advances in drug discovery and AI capabilities, it also
raises concerns about technological access and equity, such as growing urgency for
various communities to actively participate in shaping these technologies.375 The massive
resource requirements for quantum computing development, with costs running into
hundreds of millions of dollars, risk creating new forms of technological exclusion that
could disproportionately affect marginalized communities.

Fig. 5.1: (left) Google Quantum AI cooling system for Willow chip. (Google Quantum AI, published in
The New York Times, December 9, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/technology/google-quantumcomputing.html).
Fig. 5.2: (right) Willow quantum computer chip. (Google Quantum AI, published in The New York Times,
December 9, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/technology/google-quantum-computing.html).
This advancement has particularly significant implications for APIA
communities and other marginalized groups. While quantum computing could
revolutionize how we process and preserve cultural heritage, the massive resources
374 Metz, “Google Makes New Quantum Computing Breakthrough.”
375 Bernard Marr, “The Next Breakthrough In Artificial Intelligence: How Quantum AI Will Reshape Our
World,” Forbes, October 8, 2024, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2024/10/08/the-nextbreakthrough-in-artificial-intelligence-how-quantum-ai-will-reshape-our-world/.

167
required, like specialized facilities to extreme cooling systems, risk creating an even
wider technological divide. The question of who will have access to and control over
these transformative capabilities becomes crucial for ensuring equitable representation
and participation in the quantum future.
APIA LEADERSHIP IN AI DEVELOPMENT
Within this context, the creation of counter-memories becomes crucial for APIA
communities to resist and reshape technological narratives. While genAI creates new
avenues for reconstructing erased histories and challenging dominant narratives, its
application must be guided by cultural sensitivity and ethical considerations. This means
APIA communities must participate not only in developing these tools but also in
shaping the laws governing their use, emphasizing public education, trust building,
privacy, inclusion, and human-centered regulations that protect vulnerable communities
from technological exploitation.
The urgency of creating counter-memories extends beyond preserving history—it
becomes a vital tool for survival and resistance in an increasingly AI-driven world. As
Big Tech (i.e., Apple, Google/Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta) and other corporations
continue to consolidate power and influence, APIA communities must actively work to
ensure their stories, experiences, and perspectives are not only preserved but also
amplified through these new technologies. This work must be done in solidarity with
other marginalized communities, recognizing the intersectionality of our shared
experiences and contributing to a broader vision of technological justice.
When using genAI to create and amplify these counter-memories, it is important
to acknowledge and address potential biases the technology may perpetuate. As genAI
models are trained on vast amounts of data, they often inadvertently absorb and amplify
biases and power imbalances present in the source material. To mitigate these risks, the
development and deployment of genAI for creating counter-memories should involve

168
close collaboration with APIA communities, leaders, and scholars who can provide
guidance on culturally sensitive and historically accurate representations.
As this technology rapidly evolves, it becomes crucial to balance its capabilities
with human expertise and lived experience. While genAI promises incredible capacity in
processing historical data and generating new representations, the creation of authentic
counter-memories requires deep cultural understanding that current genAI systems lack.
This technological limitation, however, also presents an opportunity: it emphasizes the
essential role APIA communities must play in guiding how these technologies are
developed and deployed to serve their needs.
Diversity in participation in genAI development presents a significant challenge,
particularly in leadership roles.376 This lack of diversity can lead to genAI systems that
fail to consider the unique needs and perspectives of APIA communities, as well as the
intersectionality of issues involving identity and representation. The use of universalist
language in genAI development, such as claims that AI technologies will “benefit all of
humanity,” can mask the need for specific, intentional inclusion of diverse groups such
as APIAs, LGBTQIA+, and disabled people.
377 A more nuanced approach is necessary,
one that explicitly defines which populations are being considered and how their unique
needs will be addressed in genAI system design. As Joy Buolamwini, computer scientist
and digital activist, asserts, when “AI systems fail people of color, they ultimately fail
humanity” as a whole.378
376 Griffith, “Silicon Valley Slides Back into ‘Bro’ Culture.”
377 Syracuse University Disability Cultural Center, “Language Guide” (Syracuse University), Accessed
April 9, 2024, https://experience.syracuse.edu/dcc/resources/language-guide/.
378 Monica Melton, “Researcher Joy Buolamwini Says AI Rights Aren’t Just a DEI Issue,” Insider Inc.,
February 8, 2024, https://www.businessinsider.com/joy-buolamwini-unmasking-ai-civil-biometric-creativerights-dei-issue-2024-2?op=1.

169
TECHNICAL AND RESOURCE CHALLENGES
Accessibility to the development of genAI technologies from a resource
perspective presents another concern. In the article “Defining our future with generative
AI” (2024), Suri highlights that “it takes hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of
resources, such as GPUs and electricity, to develop LLMs.”379 This massive resource
requirement creates a substantial barrier to entry, potentially excluding many
institutions and individuals from genAI development. Consequently, poorly regulated
AI development, especially without participatory, community-led input, could
exacerbate existing inequalities from local to global in scale. This exclusion raises
concerns about potential risks such as violation of privacy, copyright infringements, and
alignment problems that may disproportionately affect underrepresented
communities.380
The technical and resource challenges facing APIA and other marginalized
communities in AI development present significant barriers to participation and
influence in this rapidly evolving field. This exclusion is further compounded by the
massive energy requirements of AI systems, with Andrew R. Chow, in the article “How
AI Is Fueling a Boom in Data Centers and Energy Demand” (2024), reporting that even
a single ChatGPT query consumes ten times more energy than a standard Google
search.381
The scale of resource consumption is staggering, with the International Energy
Agency (IEA) forecasting that “data center electricity demand will more than double
from 2022 to 2026.”382 This increasing resource intensity is reflected in the economics of
AI development, where the cost of computational power required for training models
379 Suri, “Defining Our Future with Generative AI.”
380 The Economist, “How Generative Models Could Go Wrong,” The Economist, April 19, 2023,
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2023/04/19/how-generative-models-could-go-wrong.
381 Chow, AI Demand. 382 Chow, AI Demand.

170
doubles every nine months, making independent development increasingly prohibitive
for marginalized communities and smaller organizations.383
The infrastructure requirements of AI development also create localized burdens
for marginalized communities, who often experience the negative impacts of data center
expansion firsthand. As Chow reports, historically residential areas, especially those
occupied by disadvantaged populations, are being rapidly rezoned as industrial zones to
accommodate new data centers.384 In Northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley,” for
instance, communities face displacement and disruption as their neighborhoods
transform to meet the tech industry’s expanding footprint.385 These communities
typically have minimal voice in development decisions, despite bearing disproportionate
consequences including increased strain on local resources and infrastructure.
As detailed in Chow’s analysis, the impact extends beyond physical displacement
as data centers strain local power grids and water resources. In Goodyear, Arizona,
where water scarcity already affects vulnerable populations, local politicians and
residents express serious concerns about data centers threatening their communities’
electricity and water access, with Microsoft’s facilities expected to consume more than
50 million gallons of drinking water annually.386 This massive resource consumption will
exacerbate existing inequities in resource access and environmental justice.
Without proper regulation and community-led participation, poorly regulated AI
development risks exacerbating existing inequalities at every level of society—from
neighborhoods, communities, to international markets. As Suri notes, “the resources
required to build and train these models may put them out of reach of most people and
institutions,”387 leading to concentrated control of AI development by large, wealthy
383 Chow, AI Demand. 384 Chow, AI Demand. 385 Chow, AI Demand. 386 Chow, AI Demand. 387 Suri, “Defining Our Future with Generative AI.”

171
tech companies. The concentration of power in the hands of wealthy tech companies,
coupled with marginalized communities limited economic and political capital, creates a
concerning dynamic. This imbalance means those most affected by AI infrastructure
have minimal influence over its implementation, thereby deepening existing
socioeconomic disparities388
The combined impact of the resource and technical barriers creates a multilayered challenge for APIA and other marginalized communities seeking to influence AI
development and deployment. With data centers projected to consume between 85 and
134 terawatt hours annually by 2027, the environmental justice implications add another
dimension to existing resource access disparities.389 This underscores the urgent need for
solutions that address both the financial barriers excluding marginalized communities
from AI development and the broader environmental impacts, to ensure more equitable
participation in shaping the future of AI technology.
FUTURE DIRECTION
Despite these challenges, the potential of genAI in creating counter-memories
holds promise for APIA heritage conservation. To harness this potential while
mitigating risks, a proactive and ethical approach to genAI development is crucial. This
approach includes ensuring diverse representation in genAI development teams, using
inclusive and representative datasets for training genAI foundation models, and
implementing rigorous testing for bias before deploying genAI systems in cultural
heritage contexts.390 Moreover, any genAI-driven approach to APIA heritage
preservation must be community-centered, involving APIA communities in every stage.
Future research must prioritize developing genAI models that better comprehend
and represent APIA cultural and linguistic nuances. Additionally, scholars must also
388 The Economist, “How Generative Models Could Go Wrong.”
389 Chow, AI Demand. 390 Friis and Riley, “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of Equitable AI.”

172
explore methods to maintain community-centered, ethically grounded genAI-assisted
heritage conservation efforts, investigate the long-term impacts of genAI-enhanced
collective intelligence on cultural identity and community cohesion, and examine the
balance between technological innovation and traditional preservation methods.
While genAI and collective intelligence present promising opportunities and
possibilities for APIA heritage preservation, their implementation demands thoughtful
and ethical consideration. These challenges underscore the complexity of incorporating
novel tools while establishing safeguards against abuse or misuse of technology.
Addressing these challenges requires interdisciplinary collaboration and careful
equilibrium between digital innovation and human-centered design. By centering and
prioritizing human experience and community needs, we can harness these technologies
to create more inclusive, comprehensive, and accessible representations of APIA
heritage for future generations.
While these applications offer innovative possibilities for heritage conservation
and landscape architecture, as well as creating counter-memories to challenge everyday
memoricide, thoughtful use of genAI tools in conjunction with community input is
crucial to ensure respectful and accurate representation of APIA experiences and history
in Los Angeles. Additional research in digital heritage conservation and countermapping—creation of maps that challenge colonial cartography by incorporating
indigenous memories, stories, and spiritual connections to reclaim traditional
understandings of place—could provide valuable frameworks for implementing these
ideas effectively.391
391 Chelsea Steinauer-Scudder, “Counter Mapping,” Emergence Magazine, February 2018,
https://emergencemagazine.org/feature/counter-mapping/.

173
THINGS TO CONSIDER
AI technologies must be used in a thoughtful and ethical manner, with careful
attention to both potential and existing biases, stereotypes, prejudices, misinformation,
and inaccuracies in the system. These AI-assisted technologies must complement rather
than replace human involvement, as demonstrated in projects like East at Main Street,
where AI-enhanced archives work alongside community-contributed stories to create a
more complete picture of APIA experiences.392 When properly implemented with
ongoing community input and validation, genAI becomes an invaluable and effective
tool for ensuring these crucial histories are not lost or overshadowed by dominant
narratives.
Fig. 5.3: AI facial recognition error. (Joy Buolamwini, MSFT Young M Obama, July 4, 2018, video
screenshot, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3xDVXKFBrA). AI facial recognition system
demonstrating bias by misidentifying Michelle Obama’s photograph as “a man wearing a white shirt and
black hair” with 81% confidence.
One of the most pressing issues is the existence of biases in genAI systems. This
concern ties into the broader concept of “techno-racism,” a form of discrimination
embedded in digital technologies that represents a new frontier in the fight for civil
392 Shift Collective, “East at Main Street,” APIAHiP, Accessed August 8, 2024,
https://apiahip.org/historypin?rq=east%20at%20main.

174
rights.393 W. Kamau Bell, host of CNN’s “United Shades of America,” states, “It’s not just
the physical streets. Black folks now have to fight the civil rights fight on the virtual
streets, in those algorithmic streets, in those internet streets.”394 Therefore, it is
imperative for professionals, both in research and in practices, to actively engage in
ongoing discussions about AI and its evolution. Their participation is crucial in shaping
how genAI is developed and implemented in their respective domains. Active
participation in these conversations ensures that the unique needs and perspectives of
heritage conservation and landscape architecture shape genAI development from the
outset, rather than repeating the systemic inequities seen in social media and other
digital platforms, where retroactive attempts to address racial bias, misrepresentation,
and privacy violations have proven largely ineffective.
Octavia Butler’s pressing questions become particularly relevant for APIA
communities in this context:
“Will we survive our worst habits?
Will we change?
Do we want to?”
The answer lies largely in our ability to learn from history while thoughtfully
embracing emerging technologies to create more inclusive and equitable futures.
Through the creation of counter-memories and community-centric genAI development,
APIA communities can resist marginalization while adding their stories, experiences,
and aspirations to the narrative of our collective future. As technological shifts continue
to reshape our world, the preservation and amplification of APIA counter-memories
becomes not just an act of cultural preservation, but a crucial strategy for survival and
empowerment in an increasingly AI-driven society.
393 Karimi, “People of Color Have a New Enemy: Techno-Racism.”
394 Karimi, “People of Color Have a New Enemy: Techno-Racism.”

175
The future of heritage conservation lies in the thoughtful integration of technical
capabilities with community knowledge and cultural expertise. By maintaining this
balance and more, APIA communities can harness genAI’s potential while using
counter-memories as tools for cultural preservation and resistance against technologyreinforced hegemony. As this technology rapidly evolves, it is impossible to capture all
current and ongoing experiments, case studies, and research developments in a single
work. However, the principles and frameworks discussed here aim to inspire future
researchers and practitioners to build upon these foundations while learning from past
challenges. The key lies in ensuring that APIA and other marginalized communities
maintain agency over their narratives while leveraging technological advancements to
reclaim, preserve, and celebrate their cultural heritage, even as the technological
landscape becomes increasingly uncertain.

176
6) BIBLIOGRAPHY
A24. “Everything Everywhere All at Once.” a24films.com, 2022.
https://a24films.com/films/everything-everywhere-all-at-once.
AAPI Equity Alliance. “AAPI Equity Alliance Website – Website for the Asian
American Pacific Islander Equity Alliance,” 2023. https://aapiequityalliance.org/.
AAPI LA. “The AAPI Mission by AAPI LA Podcast.” The Mission. AAPI LA, 2024.
https://aapila.org/the-mission/.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. “Los Angeles-Historic Filipinotown,
California .” www.achp.gov, October 2011. https://www.achp.gov/preserveamerica/community/los-angeles-historic-filipinotown-california.
Ahn, Lydia HaRim, Brian TaeHyuk Keum, Gintare M. Meizys, Adil Choudry, Michelle
A. Gomes, and Lei Wang. “Second-Generation Asian American Women’s
Gendered Racial Socialization.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 69, no. 2 (July 1,
2021): 129–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000575.
———. “Second-Generation Asian American Women’s Gendered Racial Socialization.”
Journal of Counseling Psychology 69, no. 2 (July 1, 2021): 129–45.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000575.
Albaghajati, Zaina M, Donia M Bettaieb, and Raif B Malek. “Exploring Text-To-Image
Application in Architectural Design: Insights and Implications.” Architecture,
Structures and Construction 3, no. 4 (October 27, 2023): 475–97.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-023-00103-x.
Alderman, Derek H, and Reuben Rose-Redwood. “The Classroom as ‘Toponymic
Workspace’: Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Campus Place Renaming.” Journal
of Geography in Higher Education 44, no. 1 (November 24, 2019): 124–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1695108.
Altman, Sam. “Planning for AGI and Beyond.” Openai.com. OpenAI, February 24, 2023.
https://openai.com/index/planning-for-agi-and-beyond/.
Anderson, Margo, and William Seltzer. Use and Misuse of the United States Census.
Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38619-0.
Anderson, Reynaldo, and Sheree Renée Thomas. “Curating the End of the World, Red
Spring, and 2nd-Wave Afrofuturism.” American Studies 60, no. 3 (2021): 21–26.
https://doi.org/10.1353/ams.2021.0023.

177
Angele, Susan, Anna W Mok, and Barbara Adachi. “Asian Representation on Fortune
1000 Boards: 2023 Edition.” KPMG. KPMG LLC, 2024. https://kpmg.com/kpmgus/content/dam/kpmg/boardleadership/pdf/2024/asian-representation-f1000-
boards_2023-edition.pdf.
Anthony Christian Ocampo. The Latinos of Asia : How Filipino Americans Break the Rules
of Race. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2016.
APIAHiP. “Historypin.” Historypin, May 24, 2024. https://www.historypin.org/en/eastat-main-street/apia-every-day-2/geo/33.64524.
Armetta, Francesco, Monika Baublytė, Martina Lucia, Rosina Celeste Ponterio, Dario
Giuffrida, Maria Luisa Saladino, and Santino Orecchio. “Chemistry of Street Art:
Neural Network for the Spectral Analysis of Berlin Wall Colors.” Journal of the
American Chemical Society, December 11, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c12611.
Arshin Adib-Moghaddam. Is Artificial Intelligence Racist? 1st ed. Bloomsbury Publishing,
2023.
Artificial Analysis. “AI Models Leaderboard | Artificial Analysis.” artificialanalysis.ai,
2024. https://artificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models.
Ascend: Pan-Asian Leaders. “Barely a Crack in the Asian Glass Ceiling.” Ascend, May
15, 2022. https://www.ascendleadership.org/thought-leadership/barely-a-crack-inthe-asian-glass-ceiling.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice. “Inside the Numbers: How Immigration Shapes
Asian American and Pacific Islander Communities | Asian Americans Advancing
Justice.” Www.advancingjustice-Aajc.org. AAJC, June 12, 2019.
https://www.advancingjustice-aajc.org/inside-the-numbers-report-2019.
Asian Art Museum. “Kongkee: Warring States Cyberpunk.” Asian Art Museum of San
Francisco, October 11, 2022. https://about.asianart.org/press/kongkee-warringstates-cyberpunk/.
Asiancinevision.org. “Asian CineVision – Presenters of the Asian American
International Film Festival,” 2024. https://www.asiancinevision.org/.
Avci, Ali Berkay, and Gamze Akyol. “AI Applications in Cultural Heritage Preservation:
Technological Advancements for the Conservation,” 2023.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24077862.v1.
Avila, Eric, and Thaïsa Way, eds. Segregation and Resistance in the Landscapes of the
Americas. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of
Landscape Architecture, 2023.

178
Bahn, Jenny, and Melissa King, eds. Anthropology of Los Angeles : Place and Agency in an
Urban Setting. 1st ed. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2017.
Bak, Marieke. “AI Can Show You the World.” The American Journal of Bioethics 23, no.
10 (October 3, 2023): 107–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2250312.
Barr, Alistair. “Big Tech’s AI Hypocrisy: Don’t Use Our Content, but We’ll Use Yours.”
Business Insider, June 2, 2023. https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-googleanthropic-ai-training-models-content-data-use-2023-6?op=1.
Barry, Jeff. “AI Art & the Commercial Value of Images.” Metaverseisopen.com. The
Metaverse is Open, January 2, 2023. https://newsletter.metaverseisopen.com/p/aiart-and-the-commercial-value-of.
Basu, Arkaprabha, Sandip Paul, Sreeya Ghosh, Swagatam Das, Bhabatosh Chanda,
Chakravarthy Bhagvati, and Vaclav Snasel. “Digital Restoration of Cultural
Heritage with Data-Driven Computing: A Survey.” IEEE Access 11 (May 29, 2023):
53939–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3280639.
BBC. “Covid Origin: Why the Wuhan Lab-Leak Theory Is Being Taken Seriously.” BBC
News, March 1, 2021, sec. China. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china57268111.
Berkeley Art Center. “Virtually Asian by Astria Suparak.” Vimeo, January 23, 2021.
https://vimeo.com/503911877.
Bhot, Abhishek Mande. “This Museum Is Using AI to Remind Us of All the Threads We
Have in Common - Source Asia.” Source Asia. Microsoft, November 13, 2023.
https://news.microsoft.com/source/asia/features/this-museum-is-using-ai-toremind-us-of-all-the-threads-we-have-in-common/.
Bond, Shannon, and Ari Shapiro. “Twitter’s Former Safety Chief Warns Musk Is
Moving Fast and ‘Breaking Things.’” NPR.org, December 2, 2022.
https://www.npr.org/2022/12/02/1140355862/twitters-former-safety-chief-warnsmusk-is-moving-fast-and-breaking-things.
Bridges, William H. “In the Beginning: Blackness and the 1960s Creative Nonfiction of
Ōe Kenzaburō.” Positions: Asia Critique 25, no. 2 (April 17, 2017): 323–49.
https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-3852249.
Brown, Evan Nicole. “How Sci-Fi Futuristic Films Appropriate, Dehumanize Asian
Characters.” The Hollywood Reporter, November 16, 2021.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/arts/sci-fi-films-asian-charactersrepresentation-movies-appropriation-dehumanization-1235048534/.
Brown, Georgia. “Counter-Mapping.” ArcGIS StoryMaps, October 12, 2023.
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/94275411178445db9cd601c2a2c348c7.

179
Brown, Tom, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla
Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, et al. “Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners.”
Arxiv (Cornell University), July 22, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.
Bultron, Ramon. “Characteristics and Issues of Asian Migration.” Journal of Asian
American Studies 22, no. 1 (February 2019): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2019.0002.
Bunker Hill Refrain. “Bunker Hill Refrain.” Bunkerhillrefrain.org, 2024.
https://bunkerhillrefrain.org.
Buragohain, Dipima, Yahui Meng, Chaoqun Deng, Qirui Li, and Sushank Chaudhary.
“Digitalizing Cultural Heritage through Metaverse Applications: Challenges,
Opportunities, and Strategies.” Heritage Science 12, no. 295 (August 13, 2024).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1.
Buratti, Giorgio, Sara Conte, and Michela Rossi. “Artificial Intelligency, Big Data and
Cultural Heritage.” FrancoAngeli Srl EBooks, January 2021, 29–33.
https://doi.org/10.3280/oa-686.4.
Burga, Solcyré. “Employees Say OpenAI and Google DeepMind Are Hiding Dangers
from the Public.” TIME, June 4, 2024. https://time.com/6985504/openai-googledeepmind-employees-letter/.
Burtch, Gordon, Dokyun Lee, and Zhichen Chen. “The Consequences of Generative AI
for Online Knowledge Communities.” Scientific Reports 14, no. 10413 (May 6,
2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61221-0.
Butler, Octavia E. “Brave New Worlds: A Few Rules for Predicting the Future.” Essence,
May 2000.
http://libproxy.usc.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/magazines/bravenew-worlds-few-rules-predicting-future/docview/223156438/se-2.
Button Poetry. “Franny Choi - @FannyChoir.” Web Video. YouTube, February 18, 2019.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOItI-NKKoI.
CAAM Home. “Center for Asian American Media,” 2023. https://caamedia.org/.
Cambodia Town, Inc. “History.” Cambodia Town, 2023.
https://cambodiatown.org/history/.
Cambodia Town Thrives. “History.” Cambodia Town Thrives, 2024.
https://www.cambodiatownthrives.org/history.
Campo, Matias del, Sandra Manninger, and Alexandra Carlson. “A Question of Style.”
Architectural Intelligence, Selected Papers from the 1st International Conference on
Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication, September 2020, 171–88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_11.

180
Castle, Lauren. “Trade Secrets Summoned to Protect AI amid Noncompete
Uncertainty.” Bloomberg Law, July 16, 2024. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/iplaw/trade-secrets-summoned-to-protect-ai-amid-noncompete-uncertainty.
Chan, Dawn. “ASIA-FUTURISM.” Artforum, June 1, 2016.
https://www.artforum.com/columns/asia-futurism-229189/.
Chan, Kenneth, Emily Gao, Ninochka McTaggart, and Janelle Sangalang. “Don’t
Believe the Hype: Asian Americans in Hip Hop.” Edited by Hannah Yang.
Camla.org. Los Angeles, CA: Chinese American Museum, August 2018.
https://camla.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CAM-Zine-2018-Asian-Americansin-Hip-Hop-Final.pdf.
Chandler, Daniel, and Rod Munday. “Technological Determinism.” In A Dictionary of
Media and Communication. Oxford University Press, 2011.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199568758.001.0001/acr
ef-9780199568758-e-2729.
Chang, Edward T. Los Angeles--Struggles toward Multiethnic Community: Asian
American, African American, and Latino Perspectives. Edited by Russell Charles
Leong. 1st ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995.
Channel Islands National Park. “A Short-Lived Livelihood: Chinese and Japanese
Abalone Fishermen (U.S. National Park Service).” Nps.gov, July 15, 2024.
https://home.nps.gov/articles/chinese-and-japanese-abalone-fishermen.htm.
Chase, John, Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski. Everyday Urbanism. Expanded. New
York: Monacelli Press, 2008.
Chen, Sonya G., and Christian Hosam. “Claire Jean Kim’s Racial Triangulation at 20:
Rethinking Black-Asian Solidarity and Political Science.” Politics, Groups, and
Identities 10, no. 3 (March 28, 2022): 455–60.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2044870.
Cheng, Alice W, Janet Chang, Janine O’Brien, Marc S Budgazad, and Jack Tsai. “Model
Minority Stereotype: Influence on Perceived Mental Health Needs of Asian
Americans.” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 19, no. 3 (May 31, 2016):
572–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0440-0.
Cheng, Cindy I-Fen. “Identities and Places: On Writing the History of Filipinotown, Los
Angeles.” Journal of Asian American Studies 12, no. 1 (February 2009): 1–33.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.0.0025.
Cheng, John. “Asians and Asian Americans in Early Science Fiction.” Oxford Research
Encyclopedia of Literature, August 28, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.924.

181
Cheng, Wendy. The Changs next Door to the Diazes: Remapping Race in Suburban
California. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
Cheung, Geoffrey, Federico Fabbri, and Clark O’Niell. “IT Spending Pulse: As GenAI
Investment Grows, Other IT Projects Get Squeezed.” BCG Global, July 16, 2024.
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/it-spending-pulse-as-genai-investmentgrows-other-it-projects-get-squeezed.
Cheung-Miaw, Calvin. “Asian Americans and Multiracial Politics: The Contribution and
Limits of Racial Triangulation Theory.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 10, no. 3
(September 27, 2021): 461–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1982736.
Chia, Adeline. “What’s next for ‘Asian Futurism’?” Artreview.com, October 10, 2024.
https://artreview.com/a-gathering-of-tomorrow-starch-singapore-review-adelinechia/.
Chinese American Museum. Built in 1890 by Philippe Garnier—a French Settler and
Prominent Businessman—the Garnier Building Is the Oldest and Most Important
Single Structure Linking the Chinese Community to Los Angeles’ Original Chinatown.
It Is Also the Oldest and Most Significant Chinese Building in a Major Metropolitan
Area of the State, as the Original Buildings in San Francisco’s Chinatown Were
Destroyed by the Earthquake of 1906. 2024. Online Image. camla.org.
https://camla.org/the-building/.
———. “Mission and History.” camla.org, 2024. https://camla.org/mission-and-history/.
———. “Past Exhibitions – Breaking Ground: Chinese American Architects in Los
Angeles, 1945-1980.” Camla.org, 2024. https://camla.org/past-exhibits/.
Chitturu, Sachin, Diaan-Yi Lin, Kevin Sneader, Oliver Tonby, and Jonathan Woetzel.
“Artificial Intelligence and Southeast Asia’s Future.” McKinsey&Company,
September 2017.
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Artificial%20
Intelligence/AI%20and%20SE%20ASIA%20future/Artificial-intelligence-andSoutheast-Asias-future.ashx.
Chow, Andrew R. “How AI Is Fueling a Boom in Data Centers and Energy Demand.”
TIME, June 12, 2024. https://time.com/6987773/ai-data-centers-energy-usageclimate-change/.
Cicchelli, Vincenzo, and Sylvie Octobre. The Sociology of Hallyu Pop Culture: Surfing the
Korean Wave. 1st ed. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84296-3.
Cipolle, Alex V. “How Native Americans Are Trying to Debug A.I.’s Biases.” The New
York Times, March 22, 2022, sec. Technology.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/22/technology/ai-data-indigenous-ivow.html.

182
CITI. “These 5 Cities Are Making Innovative Use of Generative AI.” CITI I/O, July 29,
2024. https://citi.io/2024/07/29/these-5-cities-are-making-innovative-use-ofgenerative-ai/.
City Fabrick. “CF Projects.” Cityfabrick.org, 2024. https://www.cityfabrick.org/projectcollection.
City of Los Angeles, and DataLA. “Los Angeles Index of Displacement Pressure.”
ArcGIS, January 4, 2023.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=70ed646893f642ddbca858c381471fa2#.
Collins, Brady, AJ Kim, Saba Waheed, Michele Wong, Koreatown Immigrant Workers
Alliance, and UCLA Labor Center. “Overcooked & Underserved: The Challenges
of Koreatown’s Restaurant Workers.” UCLA Labor Center, October 24, 2023.
https://labor.ucla.edu/publications/overcooked-underserved-koreatownrestaurant-workers/.
Constante, Agnes. “25 Years after LA Riots, Koreatown Finds Strength in ‘Saigu’
Legacy.” NBC News, April 25, 2017. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asianamerica/25-years-after-la-riots-koreatown-finds-strength-saigu-legacy-n749081.
Coursera. “What Is Prompt Engineering? Definition and Examples.” Coursera, October
2, 2023. https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-prompt-engineering.
Croce, Valeria, Gabriella Caroti, Andrea Piemonte, Livio De Luca, and Philippe Véron.
“H-BIM and Artificial Intelligence: Classification of Architectural Heritage for
Semi-Automatic Scan-To-BIM Reconstruction.” Sensors 23 (February 23, 2023):
2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052497.
Crockford, Kade. “How Is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?”
American Civil Liberties Union, June 16, 2020. https://www.aclu.org/news/privacytechnology/how-is-face-recognition-surveillance-technology-racist.
Cruz, Adrian. “The Union within the Union: Filipinos, Mexicans, and the Racial
Integration of the Farm Worker Movement.” Social Movement Studies 15, no. 4
(February 26, 2016): 361–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1149057.
Curationist. “Curationist: Opening Cultures Together.” Curationist, 2024.
https://curationist.org.
Dana's Beauty Supply. “Dana’s Beauty Supply.” Dana’s Beauty Supply, 2022.
https://www.danasbeautysupply.com/.
Dang, Tiffany Kaewen. “Decolonizing Landscape.” Landscape Research 46, no. 7 (July
28, 2021): 1004–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1935820.
Davies, Alys. “Suchir Balaji: OpenAI Whistleblower Found Dead in Apartment.” BBC
News, December 14, 2024. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd0el3r2nlko.

183
Davies, Dolores. “Geisel Library Exhibit Sheds Light on Chinese Workers Who Built
Transcontinental Railway.” today.ucsd.edu, January 13, 2016.
https://today.ucsd.edu/story/geisel_library_exhibit_sheds_light_on_chinese_work
ers_who_built_transcontin.
Davies, Elizabeth Jordie. “The Anti-Black Axis: Rethinking Racial Triangulation.”
Politics, Groups, and Identities 10, no. 3 (March 30, 2022): 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2055481.
De Los Santos, Brian, and Megan Botel. “Understanding the West Coast Hip-Hop
Movement with Its ‘Godfather.’” LAist, August 14, 2023.
https://laist.com/news/how-to-la/understanding-the-west-coast-hip-hopmovement-with-its-godfather.
Diep, Eric. “How Asian Americans Found a Home in Hip-Hop.” Asian American Arts
Alliance, December 21, 2023.
https://www.aaartsalliance.org/magazine/stories/how-asian-americans-found-ahome-in-hip-hop.
Ding, Hao, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris. “Racism by Design?” Journal of the
American Planning Association 89, no. 1 (June 29, 2022): 120–33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2058065.
Discover Nikkei. “James Irvine Garden.” Discovernikkei.org, 2021.
https://discovernikkei.org/en/nikkeialbum/albums/58/.
Do, Anh. “Report Shows Breadth of Anti-Asian Racism with Attacks from Alhambra to
Michigan, in Schools, Restaurants.” Los Angeles Times, May 7, 2021.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-07/anti-asian-racism-explosion.
Doucleff, Michaeleen. “What Does the Science Say about the Origin of the SARS-CoV-2
Pandemic?” NPR, February 28, 2023.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/28/1160162845/what-does-thescience-say-about-the-origin-of-the-sars-cov-2-pandemic.
Duffy, Clare. “Three More Execs out at OpenAI, Including Technology Chief Mira
Murati.” CNN, September 25, 2024. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/25/tech/openaitechnology-chief-mira-murati-leaving/index.html.
Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie, and Felix Stalder. “Digital Commons.” Internet Policy
Review 9, no. 4 (December 17, 2020). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530.
Dzieza, Josh. “How AI Can Make History.” The Verge, February 15, 2024.
https://www.theverge.com/24068716/ai-historians-academia-llm-chatgpt.
Empowering Pacific Islander Communities. “EPIC: About Us.” EPIC, 2024.
https://www.empoweredpi.org/about-us.

184
Esser, Patrick, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry
Saini, Yam Levi, et al. “Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution
Image Synthesis.” arXiv.org, March 5, 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03206.
Fleischmann, Alexander. “Who Is GenAI Leaving Out, and Does It Matter?” I by IMD.
IMD, November 12, 2024. https://www.imd.org/ibyimd/artificial-intelligence/whois-genai-leaving-out-and-does-it-matter/.
Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews.
1977. Reprint, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Francis, Theo, Berber Jin, and Tom Dotan. “OpenAI’s Complex Path to Becoming a
For-Profit Company.” WSJ. The Wall Street Journal, September 29, 2024.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openais-complex-path-to-becoming-a-for-profitcompany-bad21a42.
Fraser, Heather. “Four Different Approaches to Community Participation.” Community
Development Journal 40, no. 3 (February 25, 2005): 286–300.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi037.
Friis, Simon, and James Riley. “Eliminating Algorithmic Bias Is Just the Beginning of
Equitable AI.” Harvard Business Review, September 29, 2023.
https://hbr.org/2023/09/eliminating-algorithmic-bias-is-just-the-beginning-ofequitable-ai.
Fung, Pascale. “This Is Why AI Has a Gender Problem.” World Economic Forum, June
30, 2019. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/06/this-is-why-ai-has-a-genderproblem/.
Galer, Susan. “SAP BrandVoice: If You Think AI Is Hot, Wait until It Meets Quantum
Computing.” Forbes, March 21, 2023.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2023/03/21/if-you-think-ai-is-hot-wait-until-itmeets-quantum-computing/.
Gao, Di. “Why We’re Protecting America’s Chinatowns.” savingplaces.org. National
Trust for Historic Preservation, May 2, 2023. https://savingplaces.org/stories/whyprotecting-americas-chinatowns.
Ge, Mengting, Yang Huang, and Mintai Kim. “How Virtual Reality Renderings Impact
Scale and Distance Perception Compared to Traditional Representation.” Journal
of Digital Landscape Architecture 8 (May 2023): 533–42.
https://doi.org/10.14627/537740056..
Gent, Edd. “How AI Can Help Us Harness Our ‘Collective Intelligence.’” www.bbc.com.
BBC, May 13, 2000. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200513-how-ai-canhelp-us-harness-our-collective-intelligence.

185
George, Alice. “Eighty Years after the U.S. Incarcerated 120,000 Japanese Americans,
Trauma and Scars Still Remain.” Smithsonian Magazine. Smithsonian
Institution, February 11, 2022. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonianinstitution/eighty-years-after-us-incarcerated-japanese-americans-trauma-scarsremain-180979519/.
Ghisleni, Camilla. “Artificial Intelligence and Urban Planning: Technology as a Tool for
City Design.” ArchDaily, February 8, 2024.
https://www.archdaily.com/1012951/artificial-intelligence-and-urban-planningtechnology-as-a-tool-for-city-design.
Ghosh, Sourojit, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sanjana Gautam, Shomir Wilson, and Aylin
Caliskan. “Do Generative AI Models Output Harm While Representing NonWestern Cultures: Evidence from a Community-Centered Approach.”
Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society 7
(October 17, 2024): 476–89. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31651.
Gilbert, David. “Google, Microsoft, and Perplexity Are Promoting Scientific Racism in
Search Results.” WIRED, October 24, 2024. https://www.wired.com/story/googlemicrosoft-perplexity-scientific-racism-search-results-ai/.
Godrej, Farah. “Spaces for Counter-Narratives: The Phenomenology of Reclamation.”
Frontiers 32, no. 3 (2011): 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2011.a461367.
Goethe Institut. “Counter-Memories.” Goethe.de, 2020.
https://www.goethe.de/ins/us/en/kul/art/stp/com.html.
Golańska, Dorota. Slow Urbicide: A New Materialist Account of Political Violence in
Palestine. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003157687.
Gordon-Murnane, Laura. “ Ethical, Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Bias and
Principles.” Online Searcher, November 7, 2024.
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2272763960.
Governor Gavin Newsom. Letter to Members of the California State Senate. “I Am
Returning Senate Bill 1047 without My Signature.” Letter, September 29, 2024.
Gow, Glenn. “Revealing the Dark Side: The Top 6 Problems with ChatGPT and
Generative AI in 2024.” Forbes, January 28, 2024.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/glenngow/2024/01/28/revealing-the-dark-side-thetop-6-problems-with-chatgpt-and-generative-ai-in-2024/.
Griffith, Erin. “Silicon Valley Slides Back into ‘Bro’ Culture.” The New York Times,
September 24, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/technology/siliconvalley-slides-back-into-bro-culture.html.

186
Griffiths, Dai, Enrique Frías-Martínez, Ahmed Tlili, and Daniel Burgos. “A Cybernetic
Perspective on Generative AI in Education: From Transmission to Coordination.”
International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 8, no. 5
(February 21, 2024): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.008.
Hamed, Ahmed Abdeen, Malgorzata Zachara-Szymanska, and Xindong Wu.
“Safeguarding Authenticity for Mitigating the Harms of Generative AI: Issues,
Research Agenda, and Policies for Detection, Fact-Checking, and Ethical AI.”
IScience 27, no. 2 (February 16, 2024): 108782.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.108782.
Han, Byung-Chul. In the Swarm. The MIT Press EBooks. The MIT Press, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11055.001.0001.
Hannaford, Ewan D., Viktor Schlegel, Rhiannon Lewis, Stefan Ramsden, Jenny Bunn,
John Moore, Marc Alexander, et al. “Our Heritage, Our Stories: Developing AI
Tools to Link and Support Community-Generated Digital Cultural Heritage.”
Journal of Documentation 80, no. 5 (June 4, 2024): 1133–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd03-2024-0057.
Hao, Karen. “A New Vision of Artificial Intelligence for the People.” MIT Technology
Review, April 22, 2022.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/22/1050394/artificial-intelligence-forthe-people/.
Harkness, Lisa, Kelsey Robinson, Eli Stein, and Winnie Wu. “How Generative AI Can
Boost Consumer Marketing | McKinsey.” www.mckinsey.com. McKinsey &
Company, December 5, 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growthmarketing-and-sales/our-insights/how-generative-ai-can-boost-consumermarketing.
Hayden, Dolores. “Urban Landscape History: The Sense of Place and the Politics of
Space.” In Understanding Ordinary Landscapes, 111–33. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1997. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300185614-010.
———. “What Would a Non-Sexist City Be Like? Speculations on Housing, Urban
Design, and Human Work.” Signs 5, no. 3 (1980): S170–87.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3173814.
Heersmink, Richard. “Materialised Identities: Cultural Identity, Collective Memory, and
Artifacts.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (July 12, 2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00570-5.
Heikkilä, Melissa. “Joy Buolamwini: ‘We’re Giving AI Companies a Free Pass.’” MIT
Technology Review, October 29, 2023.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/29/1082632/joy-buolamwini-weregiving-ai-companies-a-free-pass/.

187
Heinrich, Ari, Howard Chiang, and Ta-wei Chi. “Introduction: Toward a Queer
Sinofuturism.” Screen Bodies 5, no. 2 (December 2020): 38–45.
https://doi.org/10.3167/screen.2020.050204.
Henshall, Will. “When Might AI Outsmart Us? It Depends Who You Ask.” TIME,
January 19, 2024. https://time.com/6556168/when-ai-outsmart-humans/.
Hetrick, Christian. “The Forgotten History of Terminal Island.” USC Price School. Sol
Price School of Public Policy, August 19, 2024.
https://priceschool.usc.edu/news/terminal-island-history-japanese-los-angeles/.
Hettiarachchi, Radhika, and Ricardo Santhiago. “Identity, Memory, and the
Transitional Landscape: Public History in the Context of Transitional Justice.”
International Public History 3, no. 2 (December 18, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/iph2020-2014.
Hip Hop for Change. “The Asian Influence on Hip Hop Culture.” www.youtube.com,
May 28, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hhlD9snONA.
Historic Resources Group, Sian Winship, and Christine Lazzaretto. “Los Angeles
Citywide Historic Context Statement: Japanese Americans in Los Angeles, 1869-
1970.” SurveyLA. Los Angeles: Los Angeles City Planning, August 2018.
https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/bf97b9b9-cb81-4661-8d20-
62c02b9c1415/SurveyLA_JapaneseAmericanContextandResources_Aug2018.pdf.
Hodan Omaar. “5 Q’s for Davar Ardalan, Founder of IVOW AI, and Alva Lim, CoFounder of the Timor-Leste Food Lab.” Center for Data Innovation, June 4, 2021.
https://datainnovation.org/2021/06/5-qs-for-davar-ardalan-founder-of-ivow-ai-andalva-lim-co-founder-of-the-timor-leste-food-lab/.
Holtorf, Cornelius, and Annalisa Bolin. “Heritage Futures: A Conversation.” Journal of
Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 14, no. 2 (January 13,
2022): 252–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-09-2021-0156.
Hood, Walter. “Introduction.” In Black Landscapes Matter, edited by Walter Hood and
Grace Mitchell Tada, 1–8. University of Virginia Press, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cw9rx.
Hoover, Amanda. “Spotify Has an AI Music Problem—but Bots Love It.” Wired, May 11,
2023. https://www.wired.com/story/spotify-ai-music-robot-listeners/.
Hoover, Elizabeth. “Writing from the Uncanny Valley.” The American Poetry Review 47,
no. 1 (2018): 9–11.
https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A523888773/LitRC?u=usocal_main&sid=summon&
xid=78514567.

188
HoSang, Daniel Martinez. “The Triangulators and the Triangulated: Agency and Power
in Claire Jean Kim’s Racial Triangulation Theory.” Politics, Groups, and Identities
10, no. 3 (September 6, 2021): 487–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1960174.
Hou, Jeffrey, Benjamin Spencer, Thaisa Way, and Ken Yocom. Now Urbanism. 1st ed.
2014. Reprint, Routledge, 2014. https://doiorg.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.4324/9781315753065.
Hue & Eye. “Soi Books | a Monograph about Thai American Graffiti Artist Chip7Land .”
Hueandeye.org, June 2023. https://www.hueandeye.org/soi-books-a-monographabout-chip7land/.
Ibaraki, Stephen. “Artificial Intelligence for Good: Preserving Our Cultural Heritage.”
Forbes, March 29, 2019.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/03/28/artificial-intelligence-forgood-preserving-our-cultural-heritage/.
Iñiguez, Agustina. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Strategy to Analyse Urban
Informality.” ArchDaily, March 15, 2022. https://www.archdaily.com/978356/theuse-of-artificial-intelligence-as-a-strategy-to-analyse-urban-informality.
Iwata, Jack. (93.102) the Online Collection of Photographer Jack Iwata Includes 166
Photographs and Copy Negatives Taken at Manzanar and Tule Lake Concentration
Camps between 1942 and 1945. 1942. Photograph. JANM Jack Iwata Collection.
https://janm.emuseum.com/groups/jack-iwata-collection/results.
Jacolbe, Jessica. “On Hyphens and Racial Indicators | JSTOR Daily.” JSTOR Daily.
JSTOR, August 14, 2019. https://daily.jstor.org/on-hyphens-and-racial-indicators/.
Japanese American National Museum. “Featured Collections.” www.janm.org, 2024.
https://www.janm.org/collections/featured.
———. “Hirasaki National Resource Center.” Janm.org, 2024. https://www.janm.org/hnrc.
———. “JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM to DISPLAY EATON
COLLECTION as ‘CONTESTED HISTORIES.’” Janm.org, 2017.
https://www.janm.org/press/release/japanese-american-national-museum-displayeaton-collection-contested-histories.
———. “Terminal Island Life History Project.” The Online Archive of California. UC
Libraries, 2001. https://oac.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt367n993t/?brand=oac4.
———. “Watase Media Arts Center.” Janm.org, 2022. https://www.janm.org/mediaarts.
Javad Heiran-Nia. “Is Artificial Intelligence Racist? The Ethics of AI and the Future of
Humanity.” Strategic Analysis 47, no. 6 (January 29, 2024): 1–3.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2024.2311492.

189
Jin, Emily Xueni. “What Is ‘Silkpunk’?” #SixthTone, November 14, 2022.
https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1011617.
Joern Ploennigs, and Markus Berger. “AI Art in Architecture.” AI in Civil Engineering 2,
no. 1 (August 17, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-023-00018-y.
Johri, Shreya. “The Making of ChatGPT: From Data to Dialogue.” Science in the News.
Harvard University, June 6, 2023. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2023/themaking-of-chatgpt-from-data-to-dialogue/.
Judkis, Maura. “The Deluge of Bonkers AI Art Is Literally Surreal.” Washington Post.
The Washington Post, June 30, 2024. https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/ofinterest/2024/06/30/ai-art-facebook-slop-artificial-intelligence/.
Kahn, Andrea, and Carol J Burns. Site Matters. 2nd ed. 2021. Reprint, New York, NY:
Routledge, 2004.
Kalluri, Pratyusha. “Don’t Ask If AI Is Good or Fair, Ask How It Shifts Power.” Nature
583, no. 7815 (2020): 169. https://doi-org.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.1038/d41586-020-02003-
2.
Kandil, Caitlin Yoshiko. “Asian American Enclaves Survived Racist Laws. Can They
Survive Gentrification?” NBC News, May 17, 2019.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/asian-american-enclaves-survivedracist-laws-can-they-survive-redevelopment-n1001296.
Kang, Jay Caspian. “What’s the Point of Reading Writing by Humans?” The New
Yorker, March 31, 2023. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/whatsthe-point-of-reading-writing-by-humans.
Karimi, Faith. “People of Color Have a New Enemy: Techno-Racism.” CNN, May 9,
2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/09/us/techno-racism-explainer-trnd/index.html.
Karle, Sarah, and Richard Carman. “Digital Cultural Heritage and Rural Landscapes:
Preserving the Histories of Landscape Conservation in the United States.” Built
Heritage 4, no. 5 (March 25, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-020-00006-6.
Karnofsky, Holden. “Some Background on Our Views Regarding Advanced Artificial
Intelligence.” Open Philanthropy, May 6, 2016.
https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/some-background-on-our-viewsregarding-advanced-artificial-intelligence/.
Keatley, Avery. “Writer Ted Chiang on AI and Grappling with Big Ideas.” TPR: The
Public’s Radio. TPR: The Public’s Radio, December 10, 2024.
https://thepublicsradio.org/npr/writer-ted-chiang-on-ai-and-grappling-with-bigideas/.

190
Kee, Joan. The Geometries of Afro Asia. Oakland, California: University of California
Press, 2023.
———. “Why Afro Asia.” October 2023, no. 186 (October 2023): 137–62.
https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00502.
Kim, Claire Jean. Asian Americans in an Anti-Black World. 1st ed. Cambridge University
Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222280.
———. “Playing the Racial Trump Card: Asian Americans in Contemporary U.S.
Politics.” Amerasia Journal 26, no. 3 (February 13, 1999): 35–65.
https://doi.org/10.17953/amer.26.3.qm86n1j56w025m75.
———. “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans.” Politics & Society 27, no. 1 (March
1, 1999): 105–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027001005.
Kim, Grace C, Annabel Rothschild, Carl DiSalvo, and Betsy DiSalvo. “What’s Your
Stake in Sustainability of AI?: An Informed Insider’s Guide.” In Proceedings of the
AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 7:738–50, 2024.
https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31675.
Kina, Laura, and Jave Yoshimoto. “Word of Mouth – Asian American Artists Sharing
Recipes.” Virtual Asian-American Artists Museum, 2020.
https://vaaam.tome.press/chapter/word-of-mouth-asian-american-artists-sharingrecipes/.
Klosowski, Thorin. “Facial Recognition Is Everywhere. Here’s What We Can Do about
It.” Wirecutter: Reviews for the Real World. The New York Times, July 15, 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/how-facial-recognition-works/.
Knight, Linda. “The Feminist Research-Creation Pedagogies of BIPOC Women’s
Cultural Counter-Mapping: Ecological Learning through Interrelationality,
Geontology, and Cardinal Ethics.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 55, no. 11
(July 26, 2022): 1285–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2102478.
Kogi. “About Kogi.” Kogi BBQ Taco Truck & Catering, 2024.
https://kogibbq.com/about-kogi/.
Koreatown Youth and Community Center. “Mandu (만두)-Making Holiday Party!”
Koreatown Storytelling Program. KYCC, December 16, 2023.
https://www.koreatownstorytellingprogram.org/journal/mandu-making-holidayparty.
Korotenko, Kristina. “The Copyright Crisis in Generative AI: Challenges, and Expert
Perspectives.” Everypixel Journal, February 26, 2024.
https://journal.everypixel.com/the-copyright-debate-in-generative-ai-challengesexpert-perspectives-and-predictions.

191
Kulkarni, Akshay, Adarsha Shivananda, Anoosh Kulkarni, and Dilip Gudivada. Applied
Generative AI for Beginners: Practical Knowledge on Diffusion Models, ChatGPT,
and Other LLMs. Apress EBooks. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9994-4.
LA Louver. “Gajin Fujita.” Lalouver.com, 2023.
https://lalouver.com/artist.cfm?tArtist_id=251.
Langemeyer, Johannes, Fulvia Calcagni, and Francesc Baró. “Mapping the Intangible:
Using Geolocated Social Media Data to Examine Landscape Aesthetics.” Land
Use Policy 77 (September 2018): 542–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049.
Lanier, Jaron. “How to Picture A.I.” The New Yorker. The New Yorker, March 1, 2024.
https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intelligence/how-topicture-ai.
Lee, Shelley Sang-Hee. Koreatown, Los Angeles: Immigration, Race, and the “American
Dream.” 1st ed. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2022.
Lee, Traci G. “The Fung Brothers Make the Leap from Online to On-Air.” NBC News,
May 14, 2015. https://doi.org/1020631/wtf_03072015_rk_2850.
Leike, Jan. “X.com.” X (formerly Twitter), 2024.
https://x.com/janleike/status/1791498177327341609.
Lewis, Jason Edward, Hēmi Whaanga, and Ceyda Yolgörmez. “Abundant Intelligences:
Placing AI within Indigenous Knowledge Frameworks.” AI & Society, October 19,
2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02099-4.
Li, Marika, and Nadia Amoroso. “An Early Look at Applications for Artificial
Intelligence Visualization Software in Landscape Architecture.” Journal of Digital
Landscape Architecture 2023, no. 8 (2023): 543–53. https://doi.org/10.14627/537740057.
Li, Yuan, Yumin Du, Mingshun Yang, Jiaqi Liang, Huanxia Bai, Rui Li, and Andrew
Law. “A Review of the Tools and Techniques Used in the Digital Preservation of
Architectural Heritage within Disaster Cycles.” Heritage Science 11, no. 199
(September 19, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x.
Lin, Chieh Hubert. “InfiniCity: Infinite-Scale City Synthesis.” hubert0527.github.io, 2023.
https://hubert0527.github.io/infinicity/.
Lin, Chieh Hubert, Hsin-Ying Lee, Willi Menapace, Menglei Chai, Aliaksandr Siarohin,
Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Sergey Tulyakov. “InfiniCity: Infinite-Scale City
Synthesis.” ArXiv (Cornell University), August 15, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.09637.
Lin, Jan. Taking Back the Boulevard: Art, Activism, and Gentrification in Los Angeles. New
York: New York University Press, 2019.

192
Lipsitz, George. Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture. 1990.
Reprint, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
Little Bangladesh Improvements, Inc. “Master Plan – Little Bangladesh.”
Littlebangladesh.org, 2024. http://littlebangladesh.org/master-plan/.
Liu, Jiangfeng, Ziyi Wang, Jing Xie, and Lei Pei. “From ChatGPT, DALL-E 3 to Sora:
How Has Generative AI Changed Digital Humanities Research and Services?”
arXiv.org, April 30, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18518.
Liu, Michael, and Kim Geron. “Changing Neighborhood: Ethnic Enclaves and the
Struggle for Social Justice.” Social Justice 35, no. 2 (112) (2008): 18–35.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/29768486.
Los Angeles City Planning. “Ethnic-Cultural Contexts | Los Angeles City Planning.”
Lacity.gov, 2024. https://planning.lacity.gov/preservation-design/historicresources/ethnic-cultural-contexts.
Los Angeles Conservancy. “Small Biz Hype Squad/Little Tokyo Service Center - LA
Conservancy.” LA Conservancy, July 26, 2024.
https://www.laconservancy.org/learn/historic-places/small-biz-hype-squad-littletokyo-service-center/.
Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs. Unidad Park and Gintong Kasaysayan,
Gintong Pamana Mural. 2024. Digital Photograph. HiFi Walking Tour.
https://culture.lacity.gov/hifi-eastern-gateway/.
Lowe, Lisa. Immigrant Acts. Duke University Press, 1996.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822379010.
———. The Intimacies of Four Continents. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375647.
Loza, Susana. Speculative Imperialisms: Monstrosity and Masquerade in Postracial Times.
1st ed. Lexington Books, 2017.
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hampshire/detail.action?docID=5178662.
Lubar, Steven, and Kathleen Kendrick. “The Object of History | behind the Scenes with
the Curators of the National Museum of American History.” objectofhistory.org.
Smithsonian National Museum of American History. Accessed September 14,
2024. https://objectofhistory.org/guide/.
Lundberg, Ebba, and Peter Mozelius. “The Potential Effects of Deepfakes on News
Media and Entertainment.” AI & SOCIETY, October 23, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02072-1.
Luo, Lily W. “Intimacies of the Future: Techno-Orientalism, All-Under-Heaven (TianXia 天下), and Afrofuturism.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 9, no. 1 (March 2023):
109–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2023.0005.

193
Lynch, Jamiel, and Steve Almasy. “8 Killed in Shootings at 3 Metro Atlanta Spas. Police
Have 1 Suspect in Custody.” CNN, March 17, 2021.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/16/us/metro-atlanta-shootings/index.html.
Maangchi. “LA Galbi (LA Style Grilled Beef Short Ribs) Recipe by Maangchi.”
Maangchi, June 20, 2010. https://www.maangchi.com/recipe/la-galbi.
Magalong, Michelle deGuzman. “Asian American Historic Neighborhoods Tour.”
Presented at the 2024 California Preservation Conference, June 1, 2024.
———. “The Search for ‘P-Town’: Filipino American Place(S) in Los Angeles.” Critical
Planning, 2003, 5–18.
Maitland, Anna. “After Yang – Confluence.” Nyu.edu, March 13, 2023.
https://confluence.gallatin.nyu.edu/context/interdisciplinary-seminar/after-yang.
Makhortykh, Mykola, Eve M Zucker, David J Simon, Daniel Bultmann, and Roberto
Ulloa. “Shall Androids Dream of Genocides? How Generative AI Can Change the
Future of Memorialization of Mass Atrocities.” Discover Artificial Intelligence 3,
no. 28 (July 18, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6.
Mansuri, Lukman E., and D. A. Patel. “Artificial Intelligence for Heritage Conservation:
A Case Study of Automatic Visual Inspection System.” In Current State of Art in
Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities, edited by Rita Yi Man Li, Kwong Wing
Chau, and Daniel Chi Wing Ho, 1–15. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore,
2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0737-1_1.
Marr, Bernard. “The Difference between Generative AI and Traditional AI: An Easy
Explanation for Anyone.” Forbes, July 24, 2023.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/07/24/the-difference-betweengenerative-ai-and-traditional-ai-an-easy-explanation-for-anyone/.
———. “The next Breakthrough in Artificial Intelligence: How Quantum AI Will Reshape
Our World.” Forbes, October 8, 2024.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2024/10/08/the-next-breakthrough-inartificial-intelligence-how-quantum-ai-will-reshape-our-world/.
Martina, Michael. “Rubio Pick Signals a Trump China Policy That Could Go beyond
Tariffs.” Reuters, November 14, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/rubiopick-signals-trump-china-policy-that-could-go-beyond-tariffs-2024-11-14/.
Media Factory. “Delano Manongs: The Forgotten Heroes of the UFW.” DVD, Vimeo.
Edited by Nick August-Perna and Niall McKay. Media Factory, June 21, 2014.
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/delanomanongs.

194
Melton, Monica. “Researcher Joy Buolamwini Says AI Rights Aren’t Just a DEI Issue.”
Business Insider. Insider Inc., February 8, 2024.
https://www.businessinsider.com/joy-buolamwini-unmasking-ai-civil-biometriccreative-rights-dei-issue-2024-2?op=1.
Messeri, Lisa, and M. J. Crockett. “Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding
in Scientific Research.” Nature 627, no. 8002 (March 1, 2024): 49–58.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.
Metz, Cade. “Google Makes New Quantum Computing Breakthrough.” The New York
Times, December 9, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/technology/googlequantum-computing.html.
Meulen, Nick van der, and Barbara H Wixom. “Managing the Two Faces of Generative
AI.” MIT CISR. MIT Center for Information System Research, September 19,
2024. https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/2024_0901_GenAI_VanderMeulenWixom.
Meyer, David. “Big Tech Goes back to Moving Fast and Breaking Things.” Fortune,
February 21, 2023. https://fortune.com/2023/02/21/big-tech-move-fast-break-thingstwitter-elon-musk-meta-mark-zuckerberg/.
Micieli-Voutsinas, Jacque, and Angela M. Person. Affective Architectures. 1st ed. London:
Routledge, 2020.
Miles, Tiya. “How Octavia Butler Told the Future.” The Atlantic, January 12, 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/01/octavia-butlers-guidesurviving-apocalypse/677106/.
Miller, Robin Elizabeth. “Pandora’s Can of Worms: A Year of Generative AI in Higher
Education.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 24, no. 1 (January 1, 2024): 21–34.
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2024.a916988.
Mills, Sara. Michel Foucault. 1st ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380437.
Minkler, Meredith, Analilia P. Garcia, Victor Rubin, and Nina Wallerstein.
“Community-Based Participatory Research: A Strategy for Building Healthy
Communities and Promoting Health through Policy Change.” PolicyLink.
PolicyLink, 2012. https://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/CBPR.pdf.
Miranda, Carolina A., and Los Angeles Times. The Area around Downtown L.A.’S
Garnier Building (Now Housing the Chinese American Museum) Was the Site of an
Anti-Chinese Massacre. July 24, 2020. Online Image. Los Angeles Times.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2020-07-24/six-ideas-for-newmonuments.

195
Mitchell, Audra, and Aadita Chaudhury. “Worlding beyond ‘The’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’:
White Apocalyptic Visions and BIPOC Futurisms.” International Relations 34, no.
3 (August 18, 2020): 309–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820948936.
Mitchell, W. J. T. Landscape and Power. 2nd ed. 1994. Reprint, Chicago, IL: The
University of Chicago Press, 2002.
http://www.bibliovault.org/BV.book.epl?ISBN=9780226532059.
Mitric, Jovana, Igor Radulovic, Tomo Popovic, Zoja Scekic, and Sandra Tinaj. “AI and
Computer Vision in Cultural Heritage Preservation,” 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1109/it61232.2024.10475738.
Molden, Berthold. “Resistant Pasts versus Mnemonic Hegemony: On the Power
Relations of Collective Memory.” Memory Studies 9, no. 2 (July 29, 2015): 125–42.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015596014.
Morehouse, Lisa. “Grapes of Wrath: The Forgotten Filipinos Who Led a Farmworker
Revolution.” NPR.org, September 19, 2015.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/09/16/440861458/grapes-of-wrath-theforgotten-filipinos-who-led-a-farmworker-revolution.
Morelli, Luca, Gabriele Mazzacca, Pawel Trybała, Federica Gaspari, Francesco Ioli,
Zhenyu Ma, Fabio Remondino, et al. “The Legacy of Sycamore Gap: The
Potential of Photogrammetric AI for Reverse Engineering Lost Heritage with
Crowdsourced Data.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLVIII-2-2024 (June 11, 2024): 281–88.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-2-2024-281-2024.
Morrison, Sara. “The Tricky Truth about How Generative AI Uses Your Data.” Vox,
July 27, 2023. https://www.vox.com/technology/2023/7/27/23808499/ai-openaigoogle-meta-data-privacy-nope.
Moshier, Marissa, Shane Swerdlowm, Kathryn McGee, Jenna Snow, Erika Trevis, Jenny
Cho, and Leslie Heumann. “Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement:
Chinese Americans in Los Angeles, 1850-1980.” SurveyLA. Los Angeles: Los
Angeles City Planning, 2018. https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/8481e27d2d93-431e-a201-7cb6bedc3029/SurveyLA_ChineseAmerican_Oct2018.pdf.
Mosley, Tonya. “‘If You Have a Face, You Have a Place in the Conversation about AI,’
Expert Says.” NPR, November 28, 2023.
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/28/1215529902/unmasking-ai-facial-recognitiontechnology-joy-buolamwini.
Mulgan, Geoff. “Artificial Intelligence and Collective Intelligence: The Emergence of a
New Field.” AI & SOCIETY 33, no. 4 (September 20, 2018): 631–32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0861-5.

196
Naidu-Silverman, Ereshnee. “Re-Imaging an Inclusive People’s History.” International
Public History 3, no. 2 (December 18, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2020-2009.
Nakamura, David. “With ‘Kung Flu,’ Trump Sparks Backlash over Racist Language —
and a Rallying Cry for Supporters.” Washington Post, June 24, 2020.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-kung-flu-trump-sparks-backlashover-racist-language--and-a-rallying-cry-for-supporters/2020/06/24/485d151e-b620-
11ea-aca5-ebb63d27e1ff_story.html.
National Trust for Historic Preservation. “America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places
for 2023 | National Trust for Historic Preservation.” savingplaces.org, May 9, 2023.
https://savingplaces.org/stories/11-most-endangered-historic-places-2023.
———. “America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places for 2024 | National Trust for
Historic Preservation.” savingplaces.org. National Trust for Historic Preservation
, May 1, 2024. https://savingplaces.org/stories/11-most-endangered-historic-places2024.
Netflix Is A Joke. “15 Minutes of Ali Wong.” Website Video. YouTube, March 31, 2021.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxxLmgleW1s.
Nguyen, Viet Thanh. Race and Resistance : Literature & Politics in Asian America. 2002.
Reprint, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doiorg.libproxy1.usc.edu/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195146998.001.0001.
Nicoletti, Leonardo, and Dina Bass. “Humans Are Biased. Generative AI Is Even
Worse.” Bloomberg, June 9, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-
generative-ai-bias/.
Ņitavska, Natalija, and Artūrs Mengots. “Digital Tools in Landscape Architecture.”
Landscape Architecture and Art 11, no. 11 (February 25, 2018): 42–50.
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2017.11.05.
Noble, Safiya. How AI could perpetuate racism, sexism and other biases in society.
Interview by Alisa Chang. NPR, July 19, 2023. https://www.krvs.org/artsculture/2023-07-19/how-ai-could-perpetuate-racism-sexism-and-other-biases-insociety.
Norton, Claire, and Mark Donnelly. Liberating Histories. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2018.
NVIDIA. “NVIDIA NIM | Stable-Diffusion-Xl.” Nvidia.com, 2024.
https://build.nvidia.com/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl.
O’Brien, Matt, Kelvin Chan, and Thalia Beaty. “OpenAI Wants to Move from
Nonprofit Roots to For-Profit Company.” AP News, September 26, 2024.
https://apnews.com/article/chatgpt-openai-sam-altman-nonprofit859bff5c19845f51796244e0072e2dfb.

197
OpenAI. “OpenAI LP.” Openai.com. OpenAI, March 11, 2019.
https://openai.com/index/openai-lp/.
Otero, Jorge. “Heritage Conservation Future: Where We Stand, Challenges Ahead, and
a Paradigm Shift.” Global Challenges 6, no. 1 (January 2022): 2100084.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100084.
Ottenhof, Luke. “‘It’s like Dropping a Bomb on the Louvre:’ the Remarkable Race to
Save These Critical Languages before They Die.” Popular Mechanics, October
25, 2023. https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/a45521181/will-artificialintelligence-save-native-languages/.
Our Stories. “Furusato: The Lost Village of Terminal Island.” Terminalisland.org, 2024.
http://www.terminalisland.org/.
Ouyang, Long, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L Wainwright, Pamela
Mishkin, Chong Zhang, et al. “Training Language Models to Follow Instructions
with Human Feedback.” ArXiv (Cornell University), March 4, 2022, 1–68.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155.
Owchar, Nick. “The L.A. Island That Was Home to Seven Decades of ‘Lost
Communities.’” Los Angeles Times, April 9, 2024.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2024-04-09/terminal-islandbook.
Page & Turnbull, Flora Chou, Daniel Herrick, Jonathan Kaplan, and Christina Park.
“Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement: Korean Americans in Los
Angeles, 1905-1980.” SurveyLA. Los Angeles: Los Angeles City Planning, August
2018. https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/ef26fda2-f0d7-488c-9766-
5a3491d0a6f7/SurveyLA_KoreanAmericanContextandResources_Aug2018.pdf.
Pansoni, S., S. Tiribelli, M. Paolanti, F. Di Stefano, E. Frontoni, E. S. Malinverni, and B.
Giovanola. “Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Heritage: Design and Assessment
of an Ethical Framework.” In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry,
Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2-2023:1149–55, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-2-2023-1149-2023.
Park, Eugenie, and Risa Gelles-Watnick. “Most Americans Haven’t Used ChatGPT; Few
Think It Will Have a Major Impact on Their Job.” Pew Research Center. Pew
Research Center, August 28, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/shortreads/2023/08/28/most-americans-havent-used-chatgpt-few-think-it-will-have-amajor-impact-on-their-job/.

198
Pataranutaporn, Pat, Phoomparin Mano, Piyaporn Bhongse-Tong, Tas
Chongchadklang, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Lamtharn Hantrakul, Jirach
Eaimsa-ard, Pattie Maes, and Pichet Klunchun. “Human-AI Co-Dancing:
Evolving Cultural Heritage through Collaborative Choreography with Generative
Virtual Characters.” In MOCO ’24. New York, NY: Association for Computing
Machinery, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658852.3661317.
Patraporn, R. Varisa, and Barbara W Kim. “Resurgent Ethnicity and Residential Choice
among Second-Generation Asian Americans in a Los Angeles Panethnic
Suburb.” Urban Affairs Review 58, no. 3 (June 21, 2021): 861–87.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211016941.
Peleggi, Maurizio. “The Unbearable Impermanence of Things: Reflections on
Buddhism, Cultural Memory and Heritage Conservation.” In Routledge
Handbook of Heritage in Asia, edited by Tim Winter, 55–68. Routledge, 2011.
https://doi-org.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.4324/9780203156001.
Peluso, Nancy Lee. “Whose Woods Are These? Counter‐Mapping Forest Territories in
Kalimantan, Indonesia.” In The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and
Cartographic Representation, 422–29. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch55.
———. “Whose Woods Are These? Counter‐Mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan,
Indonesia.” The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic
Representation, April 15, 2011, 422–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch55.
Pennefather, Patrick Parra. Creative Prototyping with Generative AI: Augmenting Creative
Workflows with Generative AI. Apress EBooks. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9579-3.
Perrigo, Billy. “U.S. Must Act Quickly to Avoid Risks from AI, Report Says.” TIME,
March 11, 2024. https://time.com/6898967/ai-extinction-national-security-risksreport/.
Petersen, Camille. “Capitalizing on Heritage: St. Augustine, Florida, and the Landscape
of American Racial Ideology.” City & Community 21, no. 3 (June 23, 2022): 193–213.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841221101568.
Pirker, Eva Ulrike, and Judith Rahn. “Afrofuturist Trajectories across Time, Space and
Media.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 37, no. 4 (September 25, 2020):
283–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1820542.
Price, Zachary. “Remembering Fred Ho: The Legacy of Afro Asian Futurism.” TDR/the
Drama Review 60, no. 2 (2016): 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00547.

199
Pualani Louis, Renee M. “Indigenous Cartographies and Mapping Abundance.”
Environment and Planning F 2, no. 1-2 (May 12, 2023): 322–27.
https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825231168864.
Radney, Imani. “Politics—Not Tech—Can Save Black Jobs from AI.” Public Books,
February 22, 2024. https://www.publicbooks.org/politics-not-tech-can-save-blackjobs-from-ai/.
Rash, Wayne. “Generative AI Exposes Users to New Security Risks.” Forbes, February 7,
2024. https://www.forbes.com/sites/waynerash/2024/02/07/generative-ai-exposesusers-to-new-security-risks/.
Redmon, Michael. “Chinese Abalone Fishermen - Channel Islands National Park (U.S.
National Park Service).” www.nps.gov, June 7, 2016.
https://www.nps.gov/chis/learn/historyculture/abalone-fishing.htm.
Richardson, Rashida, Jason Schultz, and Kate Crawford. “Dirty Data, Bad Predictions:
How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and
Justice - NYU Law Review.” NYU Law Review 94, no. 15 (March 5, 2019): 15–55.
https://nyulawreview.org/online-features/dirty-data-bad-predictions-how-civilrights-violations-impact-police-data-predictive-policing-systems-and-justice/.
Rocha, Gustavo, Luís Mateus, and Victor Ferreira. “Historical Heritage Maintenance via
Scan-To-BIM Approaches: A Case Study of the Lisbon Agricultural Exhibition
Pavilion.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13, no. 54 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13020054.
Roh, David S., Betsy Huang, and Greta A. Niu, eds. Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia
in Speculative Fiction, History, and Media. 1st ed. Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers
University Press, 2015.
Rooney, Kathleen. “Unmapped Realms: Sun Yung Shin’s ‘Unbearable Splendor’ .” Los
Angeles Review of Books, October 12, 2016.
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/unmapped-realms-sun-yung-shins-unbearablesplendor/.
Roose, Kevin. “OpenAI Insiders Warn of a ‘Reckless’ Race for Dominance.” The New
York Times, June 4, 2024, sec. Technology.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/04/technology/openai-culturewhistleblowers.html.
Rosin, Hanna. “The Despots of Silicon Valley.” The Atlantic. The Atlantic, February 8,
2024. https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/02/despots-siliconvalley/677386/.

200
Roth, Minhae Shim. “Anna May Wong: 13 Facts about Her Trailblazing Hollywood
Career.” HISTORY, April 30, 2024. https://www.history.com/news/anna-maywong-facts-career.
S., Balasubramaniam, Vanajaroselin Chirchi, Seifedine Kadry, Moorthy Agoramoorthy,
Gururama Senthilvel P., Satheesh Kumar K., and Sivakumar T. A. “The Road
Ahead: Emerging Trends, Unresolved Issues, and Concluding Remarks in
Generative AI—a Comprehensive Review.” Edited by Eugenio Vocaturo.
International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2024, no. 1 (September 5, 2024).
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4013195.
Sagara, M. Rosalind, David Castro, Michelle G. Magalong, and David K. Yoo. “Los
Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement: Filipino Americans in Los
Angeles, 1903-1980.” Ethnic-Cultural Contexts. Los Angeles: Los Angeles City
Planning, August 2018. https://planning.lacity.gov/odocument/f338a444-4277-4c0bb8b0-
35337ee6ef98/SurveyLA_FilipinoAmericanContextandResources_Aug2018_1.pdf.
Saito, Leland T. Race and Politics: Asian Americans, Latinos, and Whites in a Los Angeles
Suburb. 1st ed. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1998.
Samantha Murphy Kelly. “OpenAI Insiders’ Open Letter Warns of ‘Serious Risks’ and
Calls for Whistleblower Protections.” CNN. CNN, June 4, 2024.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/tech/openai-insiders-letter/index.html.
Sandomir, Richard. “Gin Wong, Who Designed Futuristic Buildings in Los Angeles,
Dies at 94.” The New York Times, September 17, 2017.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/us/gin-wong-dead-los-angeles-architect.html.
Sapp Coffee Shop. “Sapp Coffee Shop.” Sapp Coffee Shop, 2024.
https://www.sappcoffeeshop.com.
savingplaces. “The US National Trust on Instagram: "11 Days of #11Most: Little Tokyo,
Los Angeles.” Instagram. The US National Trust, May 8, 2024.
https://www.instagram.com/p/C6tdRrFO2X3/.
Scandurra, S, and E Lanzara. “VPL for CULTURAL HERITAGE MONITORING:
SAMPLING and COMPARISON of PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES.” The
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
Information Sciences XLVIII-M-2-2023 (June 26, 2023): 1435–42.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-2-2023-1435-2023.
Scharlin, Craig, and Lilia V Villanueva. Philip Vera Cruz : A Personal History of Filipino
Immigrants and the Farmworkers Movement. 3rd ed. 1992. Reprint, Seattle:
University Of Washington Press, 2000.

201
Schneider, Iris, and Los Angeles Times. Gin Wong’s Landmark Gas Station Captured the
Spirit of Midcentury Los Angeles. September 8, 2017. Online Image. Los Angeles
Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-gin-wongappreciation-20170908-story.html.
Shao, Di. “Is There a Bamboo Ceiling? The Asian-White Gap in Managerial Attainment
for College-Educated Workers.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 9, no. 1 (July 22,
2022): 233264922211148. https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492221114809.
Shen, Xiwei, Mary G. Padua, and Niall G. Kirkwood. “Transformative Impact of
Technology in Landscape Architecture on Landscape Research: Trends,
Concepts and Roles.” Land 13, no. 5 (May 8, 2024): 630.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050630.
Shift Collective. “East at Main Street.” Enter HistoryPin: East at Main Street. APIAHiP,
2014. https://apiahip.org/east-at-main-street.
Shoag, Daniel, and Nicholas Carollo. “The Causal Effect of Place: Evidence from
Japanese-American Internment.” SSRN Electronic Journal, May 2016.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798253.
Shober & Carqueville Lith Co. The Magic Washer, Manufactured by Geo. Dee, Dixon,
Illinois. The Chinese Must Go. 1886. Lithograph, color. The Library of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/resource/pga.02758/.
Shock, Culture. “Culture Shock LA.” Culture Shock LA , 2024.
https://www.cultureshockla.org/about.
Siountri, Konstantina, and Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos. “The Classification of
Cultural Heritage Buildings in Athens Using Deep Learning Techniques.”
Heritage 6, no. 4 (April 1, 2023): 3673–3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6040195.
Sisson, Patrick. “What It Looks like When AI Designs a City.” Bloomberg.com,
September 16, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-09-16/aiinvades-urban-planning-and-design-with-mixed-results.
Smith, Melissa. “What Does It Mean to Be an Afrofuturist Now? Three Contemporary
Artists on What the Term Means to Them | Artnet News.” Artnet News, March
6, 2023. https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/afrofuturism-now-2263014.
Smith, Solomon O., and LA Times. Sample a Modern Sisig at Lasita. October 25, 2023.
Online Image. Newspaper Article. https://www.latimes.com/travel/list/chinatownlos-angeles-guide-best-things-to-do.
Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art. “Asian Futurisms and Speculative Fictions
- National Museum of Asian Art.” National Museum of Asian Art. Smithsonian,
April 26, 2023. https://asia.si.edu/whats-on/blog/posts/asian-futurisms-andspeculative-fictions/.

202
Soi Books. “CHIP7LAND - Chip7. Behind the Scenes of a Bangkok Graffiti Writer.”
Stickerbombworld, 2024. https://www.stickerbombworld.com/products/chip7-
bangkok-thailand.
———. “Exploring Asian Futurism: A Cultural Odyssey into Tomorrow.” Soi Books,
November 27, 2023. https://www.soibooks.com/journal/exploring-asian-futurisma-cultural-odyssey-into-tomorrow.
———. “Welcome to the Bustle of Kowloon.” Soi Books, January 23, 2023.
https://www.soibooks.com/journal/welcome-to-the-bustle-of-kowloon.
Soun, Brandon, and Lan Nguyen. “Cambodia Town: Not for Sale.” Website Video.
Vimeo, June 20, 2019. https://vimeo.com/343563776.
Sousa, Joaquim J, Jiahui Lin, Qun Wang, Guang Liu, Jinghui Fan, Shibiao Bai, Hongli
Zhao, et al. “Using Machine Learning and Satellite Data from Multiple Sources to
Analyze Mining, Water Management, and Preservation of Cultural Heritage.”
Geo-Spatial Information Science 27, no. 3 (July 25, 2023): 552–71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2234008.
South Asian American Digital Archive (SAADA). “South Asian American Digital
Archive (SAADA),” 2024. https://www.saada.org/.
Spennemann, Dirk H. R. “ChatGPT and the Generation of Digitally Born ‘Knowledge’:
How Does a Generative AI Language Model Interpret Cultural Heritage Values?”
Knowledge 3, no. 3 (September 1, 2023): 480–512.
https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3030032.
———. “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Agency and the Future of Cultural
Heritage.” Heritage 7 (July 9, 2024): 3597–3609.
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7070170.
———. “Will Artificial Intelligence Affect How Cultural Heritage Will Be Managed in the
Future? Responses Generated by Four GenAI Models.” Heritage 7, no. 3 (March 1,
2024): 1453–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7030070.
Städelschule. “Xin Wang: Uncharting Asian Futurisms.” Vimeo, February 25, 2021.
https://vimeo.com/516661955.
Stanford, Claire. “In the Future, No One Is Completely Human.” In The Routledge
Handbook of CoFuturisms, edited by Taryne Jade Taylor, Isiah Lavender III,
Grace L Dillon, and Bodhisattva Chattopadhyay, 1st ed., 368–78. New York:
Taylor & Francis, 2023. https://doi-org.libproxy2.usc.edu/10.4324/9780429317828.
Steinauer-Scudder, Chelsea. “Counter Mapping.” Emergence Magazine, February 8,
2018. https://emergencemagazine.org/feature/counter-mapping/.
Steinhauer, Jason. History, Disrupted : How Social Media and the World Wide Web Have
Changed the Past. 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.

203
Stop AAPI Hate. “The Blame Game: How Political Rhetoric Inflames Anti-Asian
Scapegoating.” The Blame Game. Stop AAPI Hate, October 12, 2022.
https://stopaapihate.org/2022/10/12/anti-asian-scapegoating/.
Sukkar, Ahmad W, Mohamed W Fareed, Moohammed Wasim Yahia, Salem Buhashima
Abdalla, Iman Ibrahim, and Abdul Karim. “Analytical Evaluation of Midjourney
Architectural Virtual Lab: Defining Major Current Limits in AI-Generated
Representations of Islamic Architectural Heritage.” Buildings (Basel) 14, no. 3
(March 14, 2024): 786–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030786.
Sun Yung Shin. Unbearable Splendor. 1st ed. Minneapolis: Coffee House Press, 2016.
Suparak, Astria. “ASIAN FUTURES, without ASIANS Presentation.” Astria Suparak,
June 28, 2021. https://astriasuparak.com/2021/06/28/asian-futures-withoutasians_presentation/.
Suri, Siddharth. “Defining Our Future with Generative AI.” Nature Computational
Science 4, no. 9 (September 24, 2024): 641–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-
00694-5.
Syracuse University Disability Cultural Center. “Language Guide.” Disability Cultural
Center. Syracuse University. Accessed April 9, 2024.
https://experience.syracuse.edu/dcc/resources/language-guide/.
Szoniecky, Samuel. Collective Intelligence and Digital Archives. Edited by Nasreddine
Bouhaï. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
Tailor, Neelam. “WePresent | How AI Art Took over TikTok.”
wepresent.wetransfer.com, May 30, 2023.
https://wepresent.wetransfer.com/stories/tik-tok-ai-art.
Takaffoli, Macy, Sijia Li, and Ville Mäkelä. “Generative AI in User Experience Design
and Research: How Do UX Practitioners, Teams, and Companies Use GenAI in
Industry?” Designing Interactive Systems Conference, July 1, 2024, 1579–93.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3660720.
Taplin, Jonathan. “Move Fast and Break Things? Not Again, and Not with AI.” The
Hill, September 22, 2024. https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4891654-movefast-and-break-things-not-again-and-not-with-ai/.
Tapu, Ian Falefuafua, and Terina Kamailelauli’i Fa’agau. “A New Age Indigenous
Instrument: Artificial Intelligence and Its Potential for (De)Colonialized Data.”
Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 57, no. 2 (September 2022): 715–53.
https://journals.law.harvard.edu/crcl/wpcontent/uploads/sites/80/2023/01/ANewAgeIndigenousInstrument.pdf.
Tate Modern. “Subash Thebe Limbu: Ningwasum | Tate Modern.” Tate, March 2023.
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/subash-thebe-limbu-ningwasum.

204
Taulli, Tom. Generative AI. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
1-4842-9367-6.
Taylor, Taryne Jade, Isiah Lavender III, Grace L Dillon, and Bodhisattva
Chattopadhyay. The Routledge Handbook of CoFuturisms. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis,
2023.
Tello, Verónica. “Counter-Memory and And–And: Aesthetics and Temporalities for
Living Together.” Memory Studies 15, no. 2 (October 14, 2019): 175069801987600.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698019876002.
The Ahmanson Lab. “Bunker Hill Refrain | USC Sidney Harman Academy for
Polymathic Study.” usc.edu, 2024. https://polymathic.usc.edu/ahmansonlab/bunker-hill-refrain.
The Collective Intelligence Project. “CIP Whitepaper.” The Collective Intelligence
Project, 2014. https://www.cip.org/whitepaper.
The Economist. “AI Offers a Unique Opportunity for Social Progress.” The Economist,
September 20, 2018. https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/09/20/ai-offersa-unique-opportunity-for-social-progress.
———. “How Generative Models Could Go Wrong.” The Economist, April 19, 2023.
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2023/04/19/how-generativemodels-could-go-wrong.
The Newark Museum of Art. “Saya Woolfalk: Field Notes from the Empathic Universe.”
Newarkmuseumart.org, 2021. https://newarkmuseumart.org/exhibition/woolfalkuniverse/.
The Octavia E. Butler Estate. “Octavia E. Butler.” Octavia E. Butler. Accessed July 6,
2024. https://www.octaviabutler.com/.
TIME. “TIME100 AI 2023: Joy Buolamwini.” Time, September 7, 2023.
https://time.com/collection/time100-ai/6310661/joy-buolamwini-ai/.
Trinidad, Elson. “L.A.'S Historic Filipinotown Turns Ten: What’s Changed?” PBS
SoCal, August 2, 2012. https://www.pbssocal.org/socal-focus/l-a-s-historicfilipinotown-turns-ten-whats-changed.
Trizna, Mike, Garvita Kapur, Abbey Potter , and Amanda Figueroa. GenAI & the
Creativity Cycle: Can AI propel cultural heritage institutions through their digital
transformation? Interview by Mike Kemezis. EC Live!, September 25, 2023.
https://eclive.engelberg.center/episodes/genai-the-creativity-cycle-can-ai-propelcultural-heritage-institutions-through-their-digital-transformation.
Tuan, Yi-Fu. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. 8th ed. 1977. Reprint,
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

205
U.S. Census Bureau. “QuickFacts: Los Angeles County, California.” Census Bureau
QuickFacts. United States Census Bureau, 2023.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/losangelescountycalifornia/RHI42522
3#RHI425223.
U.S. Department of Arts and Culture. “Creative Placemaking, Placekeeping, and
Cultural Strategies to Resist Displacement.” U.S. Department of Arts and Culture,
March 8, 2016. https://usdac.us/blogac/2017/12/11/creative-placemakingplacekeeping-and-cultural-strategies-to-resist-displacement.
UCLA. “Bill Watanabe ’72 – UCLA Our Stories Our Impact.” UCLA: Our Stories, Our
Impact, 2024. https://ourstoriesourimpact.irle.ucla.edu/bill-watanabe/.
UCLA Alan D. Leve Center for Jewish Studies . “Jewish Histories in Multiethnic Boyle
Heights: Japanese Railroad Workers.” Jewish Histories in Multiethnic Boyle
Heights, October 2020. https://scalar.usc.edu/hc/jewish-histories-boyleheights/media/japanese-railroad-workers.meta.
UCLA Center for Neighborhood Knowledge. “CA Neighborhoods & Renter
Vulnerability.” arcgis.com, 2024.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c8e51d585f494f509cbf1
260d8e1d368.
UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. “Maps Show Gentrification, Displacement
Policies.” UCLA Luskin, July 11, 2018. https://luskin.ucla.edu/maps-by-cnkresearchers-visualized-displacement-policies-gentrification.
UNESCO. “Cultural Landscapes.” Unesco.org, 2009.
https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/.
United States Government Accountability Office. “COUNTERING VIOLENT
EXTREMISM.” GAO. US GAO, April 2017. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-
300.pdf.
University of Illinois Chicago. “Los Angeles Names Public Square in Hollywood for Dr.
Amarjit Singh Marwah | College of Dentistry | University of Illinois Chicago.”
UIC - College of Dentistry, February 3, 2019. https://dentistry.uic.edu/newsstories/los-angeles-names-public-square-in-hollywood-for-dr-amarjit-singhmarwah/.
Urban Displacement Project. “Los Angeles - Gentrification and Displacement.” Urban
Displacement, 2018. https://www.urbandisplacement.org/maps/los-angelesgentrification-and-displacement/.
US Congress. U.S. Statutes at Large, Volume 22 -1883, 47th Congress. 1882. Periodical. The
Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/llsl-v22/.

206
USC Digital Libraries. Gin D, Wong, Longtime USC Trustee. November 10, 2022. Online
Image. Save as | NextGen Heritage Conservation.
https://sites.usc.edu/saveas/2022/11/10/season-3-episode-3/.
USC KSI. “A Conversation with Roy Choi.” YouTube, April 26, 2012.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMGhEz7T_H8.
Vincent, James. “How Much Electricity Does AI Consume?” The Verge. Vox Media,
February 16, 2024. https://www.theverge.com/24066646/ai-electricity-energywatts-generative-consumption.
Visual Communications. “Visual Communications.” Visual Communications, 2023.
https://vcmedia.org/.
Waite, Kevin. “The Bloody History of Anti-Asian Violence in the West.” National
Geographic, May 10, 2021.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-bloody-history-of-antiasian-violence-in-the-west.
Wallace, Benedikte, Kristian Nymoen, Jim Torresen, and Charles Patrick Martin.
“Breaking from Realism: Exploring the Potential of Glitch in AI-Generated
Dance.” Digital Creativity 35, no. 2 (March 9, 2024): 125–42.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2024.2327006.
Wallace, Kelly. “Forgotten Los Angeles History: The Chinese Massacre of 1871.”
Lapl.org. Los Angeles Public Library, May 19, 2017.
https://www.lapl.org/collections-resources/blogs/lapl/chinese-massacre-1871.
Walsh, Theadora. “Astria Suparak’s ‘Virtually Asian’ Analyzes Sci-Fi to Argue for Less
Racist Futures.” KQED, March 2, 2021. https://www.kqed.org/arts/13893493/astriasuparaks-virtually-asian-analyzes-sci-fi-to-argue-for-less-racist-futures.
Warzel, Charlie. “The Atlantic.” The Atlantic. The Atlantic, July 12, 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/07/thrive-ai-healthhuffington-altman-faith/678984/.
Webster, Scott. “Revisiting Memoricide: The Everyday Killing of Memory.” Memory
Studies, July 3, 2023, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231184564.
West, Sarah Myers, Meredith Whittaker, and Kate Crawford. “Discriminating Systems:
Gender, Race, and Power in AI.” AI NOW. AI Now Institute, April 2019.
https://ainowinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/discriminatingsystems.pdf.
Whiting, Kate. “How Is AI Impacting and Shaping the Creative Industries?” World
Economic Forum, February 28, 2024. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/02/aicreative-industries-davos/.

207
Williams, Greg. “Silicon Valley’s Culture of Breaking Things Is Totally Broken.”
WIRED, June 7, 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/move-fast-and-break-thingsor-dont/.
Williamson, Beth. “Historical Geographies of Place Naming: Colonial Practices and
Beyond.” Geography Compass 17, no. 5 (March 14, 2023).
https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12687.
Wilson, Kyra, and Aylin Caliskan. “Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume
Screening via Language Model Retrieval.” Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI/ACM
Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society 7 (October 17, 2024): 1578–90.
https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31748.
Wong Fu Productions. “Asian Superstitions (Ft. Alan Chikin Chow).” YouTube,
October 30, 2020. https://youtu.be/HuoWxYC0dYk.
Woolfalk, Saya. “Field Notes from the Emphatic Universe.” SAYA WOOLFALK, 2021.
https://www.sayawoolfalk.com/field-notes-from-the-empathic-universe.
Wright, Webb. “AI ‘Surveillance Pricing’ Practices under Federal Probe.” Scientific
American. Scientific American, September 3, 2024.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-surveillance-pricing-practicesunder-federal-probe/.
Yang, Chen, and Kelly Greenop. “Introduction: Applying a Landscape Perspective to
Digital Cultural Heritage.” Built Heritage 4, no. 2 (March 25, 2020).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-020-00002-w.
Yang, George. “Orientalism, ‘Cyberpunk 2077,’ and Yellow Peril in Science Fiction.”
Wired, December 8, 2020. https://www.wired.com/story/orientalism-cyberpunk2077-yellow-peril-science-fiction/.
Yeol, Jang. “34년 '베버리순두부’도 문 닫는다.” Koreadaily - 미주중앙일보, September 9,
2020. https://news.koreadaily.com/2020/09/08/society/generalsociety/8640620.html.
Ylanan , Aida, and Sandhya Kambhampati. “How Los Angeles County Became Home to
the Biggest AAPI Communities in the Country.” Los Angeles Times, May 15,
2024. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-15/how-southerncalifornia-became-home-to-the-biggest-aapi-communities-in-the-country.
Yu, Mira. “AI: ‘Asian Intelligence.’” Harvardpolitics.com. Harvard Political Review,
January 19, 2024. https://harvardpolitics.com/ai-asian-intelligence/.
Zakarin, Jordan. “How the ‘Ghost in the Shell’ Movie Changed from the Original.”
Inverse, March 27, 2017. https://www.inverse.com/article/29570-ghost-in-the-shellchanges-from-the-anime-design-holograms.
Zalis, Shelley. “The Algorithm for Equality.” TIME, February 22, 2024.
https://time.com/6756770/ai-bias-algorithm-for-equality/.

208
Zawarus, Phillip. “A Mixed Reality Experience: Advancing Design Decision-Making
with Performance Metrics through Augmented Reality and Physical Media.”
Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture 2023, no. 9 (August 2023): 326–33.
https://doi.org/10.14627/537740035.
Zhang, Jiaxin, Rikui Xiang, Zheyuan Kuang, Bowen Wang, and Yunqin Li. “ArchGPT:
Harnessing Large Language Models for Supporting Renovation and
Conservation of Traditional Architectural Heritage.” Heritage Science 12, no. 220
(June 28, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01334-x.
Zhang, Rui, and Chang Zhang. “Classification and Application of Digital Technologies
in Landscape Heritage Protection.” Land 11, no. 10 (September 30, 2022): 1699.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101699.
Zhou, Eric, and Dokyun Lee. “Generative Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity, and
Art.” PNAS Nexus 3, no. 3 (March 5, 2024): 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052.
Zhou, Lexin, Wout Schellaert, Fernando Martínez-Plumed, Yael Moros-Daval, Cèsar
Ferri, and José Hernández-Orallo. “Larger and More Instructable Language
Models Become Less Reliable.” Nature 634 (September 25, 2024): 61–68.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07930-y.
Zorthian, Julia. “OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Agrees AI Must Be Regulated.” Time, May
16, 2023. https://time.com/6280372/sam-altman-chatgpt-regulate-ai/.
Zou, James, and Londa Schiebinger. “Design AI so That It’s Fair.” Nature 559, no. 7714
(July 12, 2018): 324–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8.
Zuboff, Shoshana. “Financial Times.” www.ft.com, January 25, 2019.
https://www.ft.com/content/7fafec06-1ea2-11e9-b126-46fc3ad87c65.

209
7) APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: MIXING – LESSON PLAN
HIP HOP AS A UNITING FORCE FOR BLACK AND ASIAN RELATIONS BY DARRIEN MITRI
An open-source lesson plan developed by the Asian & Black Alliance at Santa Clara
University to “facilitate learning about Asian & Black relationships” through Hip Hop.395
395 Open-source lesson plans can be found here: https://asianblackalliance.org/lessonplans/

210

211

212

213

214

215
APPENDIX 2: PROMPT ENGINEERING
Prompt engineering is the craft of creating effective inputs for AI models to
achieve desired outputs. Consider it as “learning to speak the language of AI”—knowing
how to phrase requests to get the most useful and accurate responses. This discipline
encompasses several key areas: understanding how language models process and
respond to different types of input, developing systematic techniques to guide AI
behavior, creating methods to assess and verify AI-generated responses, and building
ways to combine AI capabilities with other tools and knowledge sources.
Just as practitioners in heritage conservation use specific criteria to evaluate a
building’s historical importance or a landscape’s cultural significance, prompt
engineering requires clear parameters to generate the most helpful responses.
Here are examples of prompt engineering using Claude.ai (https://claude.ai/new):
Basic Prompt: >> “What is historic building?”
Let me help you understand what qualifies as a "historic building."
A historic building is a structure that has been deemed significant due to its age, cultural importance,
architectural merit, or connection to historical events or people. However, there isn't a single universal
definition, as different organizations and jurisdictions use varying criteria.
In practical terms:
Age: Many countries consider buildings over 50 years old as potentially historic, though this isn't a strict
rule
Significance: The building should have played an important role in local, national, or international
history
Integrity: It should retain enough of its original character and materials to convey its historical
significance
Architecture: It might represent a particular architectural style, construction method, or technological
innovation
For example, in the United States, buildings can be considered historic if they meet criteria set by the
National Register of Historic Places, such as:
Association with significant historical events

216
Connection to historically important people
Distinctive architectural characteristics
Potential to yield important historical information
Keep in mind that "historic" doesn't always mean "old" - some relatively recent buildings, like Sydney
Opera House (completed 1973), are considered historic due to their exceptional cultural or architectural
significance.
Basic Prompt: >> “Why should we preserve historic buildings?”
Historic buildings serve as irreplaceable bridges between our past and present, connecting us to the
cultural and social fabric that shaped our communities. Let me explain why their preservation matters
through several key perspectives.
From a cultural standpoint, historic buildings embody the stories, values, and ways of life of previous
generations. When we walk through a Victorian-era home, we experience firsthand how families lived,
from the layout of their kitchens to the social significance of their parlors. These buildings don't just tell
us about architecture – they reveal how people thought, what they valued, and how they interacted
with each other.
The environmental case for preservation is equally compelling. The greenest building is often one that
already exists. When we preserve historic structures, we avoid the massive carbon footprint of
demolition and new construction. Many historic buildings also incorporate sustainable design elements
that preceded modern technology – features like natural ventilation, thermal mass, and strategic
window placement that we're now rediscovering as crucial to sustainable architecture.
From an economic perspective, historic preservation often makes strong financial sense. Restored
historic districts frequently become cultural and tourism hubs, driving local economic activity. Property
values in historic districts tend to be more stable and often increase faster than in newer areas. The
specialized skills required for restoration work also create meaningful employment opportunities for
craftspeople and artisans.
There's also a crucial educational dimension to consider. Historic buildings serve as three-dimensional
textbooks, teaching us about construction techniques, artistic styles, and technological evolution. A
student can learn more about Gothic architecture by spending an hour in a historic cathedral than from
reading multiple textbooks. These buildings help us understand how our ancestors solved problems
with the materials and technologies available to them.
Beyond these practical benefits, historic buildings contribute to our sense of place and community
identity. In a world where many cities are becoming increasingly homogenized, historic buildings
provide distinctive character and help maintain local identity. They create a sense of continuity and
permanence that helps ground communities in their unique history and culture.
What's particularly fascinating is how historic preservation can actually drive innovation. The challenges
of adapting historic buildings to modern uses while maintaining their character often lead to creative
solutions that advance architectural and engineering practices. For instance, the development of

217
sophisticated seismic retrofit techniques for historic buildings has improved our overall understanding
of structural engineering.
While the answers are helpful, they are too vague to be useful. Now let’s enhance the
responses using chain-prompting:
1) Initial Knowledge-Base Prompt:
>>Define heritage conservation in relation to historic buildings, including:
- Core principles
- Main objectives
- Key stakeholders
- Tangible vs intangible elements
Present the response in clear paragraphs without bullet points, focusing on interconnections
between these elements.
Heritage conservation in relation to historic buildings encompasses the systematic care and protection
of our built heritage for current and future generations. The core principles of conservation center on
authenticity, integrity, and minimal intervention - preserving the original fabric and character of historic
structures while ensuring their continued use and relevance in contemporary society.
These principles directly shape the main objectives of heritage conservation, which focus on protecting
both the physical structure and its cultural significance. Conservation aims to maintain the historical
evidence embodied in the building's materials, design, and workmanship while adapting to necessary
changes that ensure the building's continued viability. This includes developing sustainable
management strategies that balance preservation with contemporary needs.
The process involves diverse stakeholders whose interests and responsibilities often intersect. Property
owners, heritage professionals, local governments, community members, and cultural organizations
each play vital roles. Conservation architects and craftspeople contribute technical expertise, while
historians and cultural specialists provide insights into the building's significance. Local communities
often have deep connections to these buildings, making their involvement crucial for successful
conservation outcomes.
Heritage conservation addresses both tangible and intangible elements, recognizing that historic
buildings embody more than just physical materials. The tangible aspects include the building's
structure, materials, decorative elements, and spatial organization. These physical elements
interweave with intangible aspects - the social memories, cultural practices, traditional craftsmanship,
and community values associated with the building. Traditional building techniques and materials
knowledge, passed down through generations, represent both tangible skills and intangible cultural
heritage.
Conservation planning must consider how these elements interact and influence each other. For
example, preserving traditional construction techniques not only maintains the building's physical
authenticity but also keeps alive the intangible heritage of traditional craftsmanship. Similarly,
adapting historic buildings for contemporary use while respecting their cultural significance requires

218
careful consideration of both tangible and intangible values. This holistic approach ensures that
conservation efforts protect not just the physical structure but the full spectrum of cultural heritage
embodied in historic buildings.
2) Analysis Prompt:
>>Using the previous response about heritage conservation, analyze:
1. How does each principle directly impact preservation decisions?
2. What measurable outcomes demonstrate successful conservation?
3. Where do conflicts typically arise between different stakeholders?
4. How are trade-offs between modernization and preservation managed?
Provide specific examples for each point.
Based on the previous explanation of heritage conservation principles, let me analyze these key
questions with specific examples.
The core principles of authenticity, integrity, and minimal intervention directly shape preservation
decisions in several ways. When conservators face choices about replacing damaged materials, the
principle of authenticity might lead them to source historically accurate materials - for instance, using
hand-made bricks that match the original composition and manufacturing technique rather than
modern alternatives. The principle of minimal intervention often guides decisions about structural
reinforcement, such as choosing to stabilize an existing beam with traditional joinery techniques
instead of replacing it entirely with modern steel supports.
Successful conservation can be measured through several concrete outcomes. Physical indicators
include the stability of original materials, absence of further deterioration, and effectiveness of
preservation treatments - for example, monitoring moisture levels in walls after waterproofing
treatments. Cultural indicators might track continued community use of the space, documented
through visitor numbers or community events. Economic sustainability can be measured through
maintenance cost ratios, occupancy rates for adapted spaces, and revenue generation from appropriate
new uses. Documentation quality, including detailed records of all interventions and regular condition
assessments, also serves as a key metric.
Conflicts between stakeholders typically emerge around competing priorities and resource allocation.
Property owners might prioritize economic viability, pushing for modern amenities like elevator
installations that heritage professionals view as compromising to the building's integrity. Local
communities might value continued traditional use of a space while developers propose more
profitable adaptations. For example, converting a historic market hall into high-end retail spaces might
generate more revenue but displace traditional vendors and community gathering functions.
Trade-offs between modernization and preservation require careful balancing through established
frameworks. For instance, when updating historic buildings for accessibility compliance, solutions
might include installing removable ramps rather than permanent structural changes, or incorporating
modern climate control systems within existing architectural features rather than adding visible
external units. A successful example is the adaptation of historic industrial buildings for modern office

219
use, where original structural elements and spatial qualities are preserved while discreetly integrating
contemporary infrastructure like data cables and HVAC systems within non-historic elements.
Each of these decisions requires careful consideration of both immediate and long-term impacts on the
building's cultural significance and physical integrity. For instance, choosing between traditional repair
methods that require regular maintenance versus modern solutions promising longer durability
involves weighing authenticity against practical sustainability. The key lies in finding solutions that
respect heritage values while ensuring the building remains functional and relevant for contemporary
use.
This analysis reveals how theoretical principles translate into practical decisions, emphasizing the need
for systematic evaluation frameworks that can guide complex conservation choices. Would you like to
explore any of these aspects in more detail, particularly regarding specific preservation techniques or
decision-making frameworks?
3) Application Prompt:
>>Based on the principles and analysis from previous responses, create a framework for
evaluating a historic building's conservation needs:
1. Physical condition assessment criteria
2. Cultural significance metrics
3. Community impact factors
4. Economic viability considerations
5. Environmental sustainability aspects
Show how these elements interact and influence each other in decision-making.
Based on the previous heritage conservation principles and analysis, here's a comprehensive framework
for evaluating historic building conservation needs, showing how different elements interconnect in the
decision-making process.
Physical Condition Assessment Criteria focuses on the building's material and structural integrity. This
includes structural stability (foundation, load-bearing walls, roof systems), material deterioration
(weathering, decay, pest damage), and existing modifications. For example, rising damp in walls affects
not only immediate repair needs but also influences future use options and maintenance costs. These
conditions directly impact both economic viability through maintenance costs and environmental
sustainability through resource consumption.
Cultural Significance Metrics evaluate both tangible and intangible heritage values. This encompasses
architectural merit (style, craftsmanship, rarity), historical importance (events, people, patterns of
development), and social value (community memory, traditional uses, cultural practices). A building's
cultural significance influences economic potential through heritage tourism while shaping community
impact through identity and social cohesion. For instance, a former industrial building's significance
might lie both in its architectural features and its role in local labor history.
Community Impact Factors examine how the building serves and affects its community. This includes
accessibility (physical and social), current use patterns, community attachment, and potential for
continued or adaptive use. Strong community connections can enhance economic viability through

220
sustained use and support, while community needs influence decisions about environmental upgrades
and modernization. Consider how a historic market building's community role affects decisions about
energy efficiency improvements or space modifications.
Economic Viability Considerations assess both immediate and long-term financial sustainability. This
covers maintenance costs, potential revenue streams, funding sources, and market conditions.
Economic factors influence environmental sustainability choices through available resources for
upgrades, while affecting community impact through affordability and access. For example, decisions
about installing energy-efficient systems must balance initial costs against long-term savings and
preservation needs.
Environmental Sustainability Aspects evaluate resource efficiency and environmental impact. This
includes energy performance, material lifecycle, waste management, and climate resilience.
Environmental considerations interact with physical condition through material choices, with economic
viability through operational costs, and with community impact through comfort and usability. A
historic building's thermal mass might provide natural climate control, influencing decisions about
modern HVAC installation.
These elements form an interconnected decision-making web where changes in one area ripple
through others. For instance:
- Improving energy efficiency (environmental) requires considering original fabric preservation
(physical), installation costs (economic), and user comfort (community)
- Adapting spaces for new uses (economic) must respect heritage values (cultural), maintain building
integrity (physical), and serve community needs (community)
- Preserving traditional craftsmanship (cultural) affects maintenance approaches (physical), skill
availability (economic), and resource use (environmental)
This framework demonstrates how conservation decisions require balanced consideration of multiple
factors, with each element influencing and being influenced by the others.
4) Implementation Prompt:
>>Using the established framework, outline an action plan that:
- Prioritizes conservation efforts
- Addresses stakeholder concerns
- Balances preservation with practical use
- Establishes monitoring mechanisms
- Creates adaptive management strategies
Include specific timelines and decision points.
Using the established framework for historic building conservation, here's a structured action plan that
integrates multiple priorities and establishes clear decision points.
Phase 1: Initial Assessment and Planning (Months 1-3)
Immediate priority is comprehensive documentation and condition assessment. Begin with noninvasive investigations of structural stability, material condition, and systems performance.
Simultaneously conduct stakeholder surveys and community consultation workshops. By month 3,

221
complete baseline documentation including detailed photographs, measurements, and condition
mapping. Critical decision point: Determine if emergency stabilization is needed before proceeding.
Phase 2: Strategic Development (Months 4-6)
Synthesize assessment findings into a prioritized list of conservation needs. Develop multiple use
scenarios that align with stakeholder input and building capacity. Create detailed cost estimates and
funding strategies for each scenario. Key deliverable: Conservation Management Plan that includes:
- Prioritized repair schedule based on urgency and interdependencies
- Use adaptation proposals with impact assessments
- Funding strategy including grants, partnerships, and revenue streams
- Stakeholder communication protocol
Decision point: Select preferred use scenario and conservation approach.
Phase 3: Implementation Planning (Months 7-9)
Develop detailed work specifications for priority repairs. Establish contractor selection criteria
emphasizing conservation expertise. Create phasing plan that minimizes disruption to existing uses.
Set up monitoring protocols for:
- Physical condition indicators (moisture levels, structural movement)
- Usage patterns and community engagement
- Economic performance metrics
- Environmental performance data
Decision point: Approve final implementation plan and contractor selection.
Phase 4: Active Conservation (Months 10-24)
Execute conservation work in planned phases:
- Months 10-12: Critical structural repairs and weatherproofing
- Months 13-18: Major conservation works
- Months 19-24: Finishing works and systems upgrades
Monthly review points to assess progress and adjust approach based on findings. Quarterly stakeholder
updates and site visits.
Phase 5: Transition and Monitoring (Months 25-36)
Implement adaptive use program gradually while monitoring impacts. Establish regular maintenance
schedules and responsibility frameworks. Conduct quarterly performance reviews covering:
- Conservation effectiveness
- User satisfaction
- Economic sustainability
- Environmental performance
Annual comprehensive evaluation with stakeholders to adjust management strategies.
Adaptive Management Strategies:
- Monthly site inspections with response protocols for emerging issues
- Quarterly performance reviews against established metrics
- Annual stakeholder reviews to assess satisfaction and changing needs
- Five-year major review of conservation effectiveness and management approach
Decision Triggers:
- Deviation from expected performance metrics triggers review

222
- Significant change in user needs prompts use assessment
- New funding opportunities initiate strategy review
- Emerging conservation techniques warrant approach evaluation
This plan emphasizes flexible response to changing conditions while maintaining focus on core
conservation objectives. Each phase includes clear decision points and evaluation criteria to ensure
accountability and effective progression.
5) Evaluation Prompt:
>>Develop success metrics for the conservation plan that measure:
- Physical preservation effectiveness
- Community engagement levels
- Economic sustainability
- Cultural heritage protection
- Environmental impact
Explain how each metric relates to the original conservation principles.
Based on our understanding of heritage conservation principles, here's a comprehensive set of success
metrics that align with core conservation values while providing measurable outcomes.
Physical Preservation Effectiveness
- Material integrity: Measure percentage of original fabric retained and condition ratings on quarterly
basis
- Structural stability: Monitor movement and settlement through digital sensors, with monthly data
collection
- Deterioration rates: Track before/after conservation treatment effectiveness through photographic
documentation and measured decay rates
- Maintenance efficiency: Record frequency and cost of repairs, comparing against baseline data
These metrics directly support the principle of minimal intervention by quantifying the effectiveness of
conservation treatments.
Community Engagement Levels
- Usage patterns: Track visitor numbers, space utilization rates, and types of activities
- Stakeholder participation: Measure attendance at community events, advisory meetings, and
volunteer programs
- Public awareness: Monitor social media engagement, press coverage, and educational program
participation
- Accessibility: Assess physical and social access improvements through user surveys and accessibility
audits
These metrics connect to the principle of social value and community ownership of heritage.
Economic Sustainability
- Operating costs: Track maintenance, utilities, and staffing expenses against budget projections
- Revenue generation: Monitor income from appropriate uses, tours, events, and other activities
- Grant success: Record funding secured for conservation work and community programs
- Property value impact: Assess influence on surrounding property values and local economic activity

223
These metrics demonstrate the building's viability while respecting heritage values.
Cultural Heritage Protection
- Documentation quality: Evaluate completeness of building history, conservation records, and cultural
mapping
- Traditional skills preservation: Track number of craftspeople trained and traditional techniques
preserved
- Cultural continuity: Monitor continuation of historical uses and cultural practices
- Interpretation effectiveness: Assess visitor understanding through surveys and feedback analysis
These metrics align with authenticity principles and intangible heritage preservation.
Environmental Impact
- Energy efficiency: Measure consumption patterns and improvements from conservation interventions
- Waste reduction: Track construction waste diverted from landfills during conservation work
- Material sustainability: Monitor percentage of salvaged and locally sourced materials used
- Climate resilience: Assess building performance during extreme weather events
These metrics balance environmental sustainability with heritage conservation principles.
Each metric category interacts with others, reflecting the holistic nature of heritage conservation:
- Physical preservation affects environmental performance
- Community engagement influences economic sustainability
- Cultural protection shapes community value
- Environmental measures impact long-term preservation
Success requires positive trends across multiple metrics, acknowledging that improvements in one area
may temporarily affect others during the conservation process. Regular review and adjustment of these
metrics ensures they remain relevant to evolving conservation needs and community priorities.
This example of chain-prompting demonstrates how each prompt builds upon previous
responses to create a comprehensive understanding and actionable framework. The
prompts progress from theoretical understanding to practical application, ensuring that
each step informs the next.

224
APPENDIX 3: BUILDING A MUSIC MIXING WEB-BASED APP USING
CLAUDE.AI
Image Source: Halline Overby, 2018. (Published in Kenneth Chan et al., Don’t Believe the Hype: Asian
Americans in Hip Hop, Chinese American Museum).
Image source: Screenshot of web application interface. (Created by author).

225
Claude.AI (https://claude.ai/new)
>>Prompt (in bold): create a code for an app to play music based on the information in
the pdf. recommend which program or language to use
For creating a DJ mixing application, I’d recommend using Python with either Pygame
or PyQt for the GUI and audio handling. Python is great for this because it has robust
audio processing libraries and is relatively easy to work with. Here’s a basic concept
using Python and Pygame:
```python
import pygame
import sys
from pygame import mixer
from tkinter import filedialog
import tkinter as tk
class DJMixer:
def __init__(self):
# Initialize Pygame and mixer
pygame.init()
pygame.mixer.init()

# Create two channels for the virtual turntables
self.channel1 = pygame.mixer.Channel(0)
self.channel2 = pygame.mixer.Channel(1)

# Initialize volume and crossfader values
self.volume1 = 1.0
self.volume2 = 1.0
self.crossfader = 0.5 # Center position

# Track loading states
self.track1 = None
self.track2 = None

def load_track(self, channel):
“““Load an audio file into specified channel”““
root = tk.Tk()
root.withdraw()
file_path = filedialog.askopenfilename(

226
filetypes=[(“Audio Files”, “*.mp3 *.wav”)])

if file_path:
if channel == 1:
self.track1 = pygame.mixer.Sound(file_path)
self.channel1.play(self.track1)
else:
self.track2 = pygame.mixer.Sound(file_path)
self.channel2.play(self.track2)

def set_channel_volume(self, channel, volume):
“““Adjust volume for specific channel”““
if channel == 1:
self.volume1 = max(0.0, min(1.0, volume))
self.channel1.set_volume(self.volume1)
else:
self.volume2 = max(0.0, min(1.0, volume))
self.channel2.set_volume(self.volume2)

def set_crossfader(self, position):
“““Control crossfader between channels”““
self.crossfader = max(0.0, min(1.0, position))
# Calculate volumes based on crossfader position
self.channel1.set_volume(self.volume1 * (1 - self.crossfader))
self.channel2.set_volume(self.volume2 * self.crossfader)

def adjust_pitch(self, channel, pitch):
“““Adjust pitch/speed of the track”““
if channel == 1 and self.track1:
self.track1.set_volume(pitch)
elif channel == 2 and self.track2:
self.track2.set_volume(pitch)
def main():
dj = DJMixer()

# Basic GUI could be added here using PyQt or tkinter
# For now, just demonstrate core functionality
while True:
for event in pygame.event.get():
if event.type == pygame.QUIT:
pygame.quit()
sys.exit()
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
```

227
This is a basic implementation that includes the core features mentioned in the PDF:
- Two turntables (channels) for playing music
- Channel faders for individual volume control
- Crossfader functionality
- Basic pitch control
- Ability to load and play tracks
To make this a full-featured DJ application, you would want to add:
1. A proper GUI using PyQt or tkinter
2. Waveform visualization of the tracks
3. BPM detection and sync capabilities
4. Effects processing
5. More advanced pitch/tempo control
6. Beat matching assistance
7. Cue points and looping functionality
For a more professional implementation, you might consider these alternative approaches:
1. Using a more specialized audio framework like PortAudio or JACK
2. Implementing it as a web application using Web Audio API and JavaScript
3. Using C++ with JUCE framework for better performance
4. Using Processing for visual feedback and controls
The choice depends on your specific needs:
- Python: Good for prototypes and learning
- Web Audio API: Great for cross-platform accessibility
- C++/JUCE: Best for professional-grade performance
- Processing: Excellent for visual-heavy applications
Would you like me to expand on any of these aspects or provide more specific implementation details
for any particular feature?
Help me create a code for a DJ app to emulate a DJ equipment like the one described in
the attached .PDF file? I want to use Web Audio API. Add 6 band equalizer and let is
use mp3 files instead of wav?
I’ll help you create a DJ application using Web Audio API with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This
implementation will include a 6-band equalizer and MP3 support.
First, here’s the HTML structure:
```html

228
Web DJ Mixer

.deck {
border: 1px solid #333;
padding: 20px;
margin: 10px;
display: inline-block;
}
.mixer-controls {
margin: 20px;
}
.eq-slider {
writing-mode: bt-lr;
-webkit-appearance: slider-vertical;
width: 20px;
height: 100px;
margin: 0 10px;
}

Deck 1

Play
Pause

Deck 2

Play
Pause

Crossfader

```

229
Now here’s the JavaScript code:
```javascript
let audioContext;
let deck1, deck2;
class DJDeck {
constructor(deckNumber) {
this.deckNumber = deckNumber;
this.audioContext = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)();
this.source = null;
this.gainNode = this.audioContext.createGain();

// Create 6-band EQ
this.eqBands = [
{ f: 60, type: ‘lowshelf’ },
{ f: 170, type: ‘peaking’ },
{ f: 350, type: ‘peaking’ },
{ f: 1000, type: ‘peaking’ },
{ f: 3500, type: ‘peaking’ },
{ f: 10000, type: ‘highshelf’ }
];

this.eqNodes = this.eqBands.map(band => {
const filter = this.audioContext.createBiquadFilter();
filter.type = band.type;
filter.frequency.value = band.f;
filter.gain.value = 0;
filter.Q.value = 1;
return filter;
});

// Create EQ interface
this.createEQInterface();

// Connect nodes
this.connectNodes();
}
createEQInterface() {
const eqDiv = document.getElementById(`eq${this.deckNumber}`);
this.eqBands.forEach((band, i) => {
const slider = document.createElement(‘input’);

230
slider.type = ‘range’;
slider.className = ‘eq-slider’;
slider.min = -12;
slider.max = 12;
slider.value = 0;
slider.setAttribute(‘data-index’, i);

slider.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const index = e.target.getAttribute(‘data-index’);
this.eqNodes[index].gain.value = e.target.value;
});

eqDiv.appendChild(slider);
});
}
connectNodes() {
let prevNode = null;
this.eqNodes.forEach(node => {
if (prevNode) {
prevNode.connect(node);
}
prevNode = node;
});
prevNode.connect(this.gainNode);
this.gainNode.connect(this.audioContext.destination);
}
async loadTrack(file) {
const arrayBuffer = await file.arrayBuffer();
const audioBuffer = await this.audioContext.decodeAudioData(arrayBuffer);

if (this.source) {
this.source.stop();
}

this.source = this.audioContext.createBufferSource();
this.source.buffer = audioBuffer;
this.source.connect(this.eqNodes[0]);

return this.source;
}
play() {

231
if (this.source) {
this.source.start(0);
}
}
pause() {
if (this.source) {
this.source.stop();
}
}
setVolume(value) {
this.gainNode.gain.value = value;
}
}
// Initialize decks when page loads
window.onload = () => {
deck1 = new DJDeck(1);
deck2 = new DJDeck(2);
// Setup file input handlers
document.getElementById(‘audio1’).addEventListener(‘change’, async (e) => {
const file = e.target.files[0];
await deck1.loadTrack(file);
});
document.getElementById(‘audio2’).addEventListener(‘change’, async (e) => {
const file = e.target.files[0];
await deck2.loadTrack(file);
});
// Setup crossfader
document.getElementById(‘crossfader’).addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const value = e.target.value / 100;
deck1.setVolume(1 - value);
deck2.setVolume(value);
});
};
// Playback controls
function playDeck1() {
deck1.play();
}

232
function pauseDeck1() {
deck1.pause();
}
function playDeck2() {
deck2.play();
}
function pauseDeck2() {
deck2.pause();
}
```
This code provides:
1. Two decks with independent controls
2. 6-band equalizer for each deck:
- 60 Hz (Low shelf)
- 170 Hz (Low-mid)
- 350 Hz (Mid)
- 1 kHz (Mid-high)
- 3.5 kHz (Presence)
- 10 kHz (High shelf)
3. Crossfader between decks
4. MP3 file support
5. Basic play/pause controls
To enhance this further, you could add:
1. Waveform visualization
2. BPM detection and sync
3. Effects processing (delay, reverb, etc.)
4. Pitch control
5. Loop points
6. Cue points
7. Level meters
Would you like me to expand on any of these additional features or explain any part of the current
implementation in more detail?
Remember to serve this through a web server due to browser security restrictions when working with
the Web Audio API.

233
>>yes, can you further enhance it? Please provide step by step instructions on how to
create using Web Audio API with all the features you listed.
I’ll break down the creation of a comprehensive DJ application using Web Audio API into steps. Let’s
create a more advanced version with all features.
STEP 1: Set up the HTML structure
```html

Professional Web DJ

Play
Cue
Sync

-
+

In
Out
Loop

234

Simple DJ App

Deck 1

Play
Pause

Volume:

Crossfader

241

Deck 2

Play
Pause

Volume:

```
```css
/* styles.css */
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-around;
padding: 20px;
}
.deck {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
padding: 20px;
width: 300px;
}
.mixer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
padding: 20px;
}

242
canvas {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
background: #f0f0f0;
}
.controls {
margin: 10px 0;
}
.volume-control {
margin: 10px 0;
}
```
```javascript
// app.js
class DJDeck {
constructor(deckNumber) {
// Initialize audio context
this.audioContext = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)();

// Create audio nodes
this.gainNode = this.audioContext.createGain(); // For volume control
this.gainNode.connect(this.audioContext.destination);

// Store deck number
this.deckNumber = deckNumber;

// Get HTML elements
this.fileInput = document.getElementById(`audio${deckNumber}`);
this.playButton = document.getElementById(`play${deckNumber}`);
this.pauseButton = document.getElementById(`pause${deckNumber}`);
this.volumeSlider = document.getElementById(`volume${deckNumber}`);
this.waveformCanvas = document.getElementById(`waveform${deckNumber}`);

// Set up event listeners
this.setupEventListeners();

// Initialize audio source as null
this.audioSource = null;
this.audioBuffer = null;
}

243
setupEventListeners() {
// File loading
this.fileInput.addEventListener(‘change’, (e) => this.loadFile(e));

// Playback controls
this.playButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.play());
this.pauseButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.pause());

// Volume control
this.volumeSlider.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
this.gainNode.gain.value = e.target.value;
});
}
async loadFile(event) {
const file = event.target.files[0];
const arrayBuffer = await file.arrayBuffer();

// Decode audio data
this.audioContext.decodeAudioData(arrayBuffer, (buffer) => {
this.audioBuffer = buffer;
this.drawWaveform(buffer);
});
}
play() {
if (this.audioBuffer) {
// Create new audio source
this.audioSource = this.audioContext.createBufferSource();
this.audioSource.buffer = this.audioBuffer;

// Connect source to gain node
this.audioSource.connect(this.gainNode);

// Start playback
this.audioSource.start();
}
}
pause() {
if (this.audioSource) {
this.audioSource.stop();
}
}

244
drawWaveform(audioBuffer) {
const canvas = this.waveformCanvas;
const ctx = canvas.getContext(‘2d’);
const data = audioBuffer.getChannelData(0);

// Clear canvas
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);

// Draw waveform
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.strokeStyle = ‘blue’;

const step = Math.ceil(data.length / canvas.width);
for (let i = 0; i < canvas.width; i++) {
const value = data[i * step];
const y = (value + 1) * canvas.height / 2;

if (i === 0) {
ctx.moveTo(i, y);
} else {
ctx.lineTo(i, y);
}
}

ctx.stroke();
}
}
// Create two decks when page loads
window.onload = function() {
const deck1 = new DJDeck(1);
const deck2 = new DJDeck(2);
// Set up crossfader
const crossfader = document.getElementById(‘crossfader’);
crossfader.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const value = parseFloat(e.target.value);
deck1.gainNode.gain.value = 1 - value;
deck2.gainNode.gain.value = value;
});
};
```

245
Let me explain the key concepts in the JavaScript code:
1. The `DJDeck` class represents one deck of the DJ setup. Each deck can:
- Load an MP3 file
- Play/pause the audio
- Control volume
- Show a waveform visualization
2. Key components:
- `AudioContext`: The main audio processing system
- `GainNode`: Controls the volume
- `AudioBufferSourceNode`: Plays the audio file
- Canvas: Draws the waveform
3. Main functions:
- `loadFile`: Loads and decodes an MP3 file
- `play`: Starts playing the audio
- `pause`: Stops the audio
- `drawWaveform`: Shows the audio visualization
4. The crossfader controls the relative volume between the two decks
To use this app:
1. Open the HTML file in a browser
2. Load MP3 files into each deck using the file inputs
3. Use the play/pause buttons to control playback
4. Adjust individual volumes and the crossfader
5. Watch the waveform visualization
This is a basic version that you can build upon. Would you like me to explain how to add any
specific features like:
1. BPM detection
2. Effects (delay, reverb)
3. EQ controls
4. Loop points
5. Better visualization
Let me know what interests you most!

246
>>ok, now create a new version of the code with all the upgraded features added
I’ll create an enhanced version with all features. I’ll break it into multiple parts for better
organization.
First, let’s update the HTML structure:
```html

Advanced DJ App

Deck 1

BPM: --

Play
Pause
Cue
Sync

0%
-
+

247

Loop In
Loop Out
Loop Enable

HIGH

MID

LOW

Delay

Reverb

Filter

248

CROSSFADER

MASTER

```
Next, I’ll share the CSS and JavaScript files. Would you like me to continue with:
1. The CSS styling
2. The effects.js (audio effects implementation)
3. The audioAnalysis.js (BPM detection and beat tracking)
4. The visualization.js (waveform and meter visualization)
5. The deck.js (main deck functionality)
6. The app.js (main application logic)
Let me know which part you’d like to see next!

249
Also, I’ll suggest some improvements for the UI/UX:
1. Adding keyboard shortcuts
2. Including visual feedback for active effects
3. Adding a beat-matching assistant
4. Including hot cue points
5. Adding track library management
Would you like me to continue with any of these aspects?
>>yes, continue with css and javascript files
I’ll continue with the CSS and JavaScript files. Let’s start with the CSS:
```css
/* styles.css */
:root {
--deck-bg: #2a2a2a;
--mixer-bg: #1a1a1a;
--accent-color: #00ff99;
--slider-color: #4a4a4a;
}
body {
background: #1a1a1a;
color: white;
font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
margin: 0;
padding: 20px;
}
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr auto 1fr;
gap: 20px;
max-width: 1400px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.deck {
background: var(--deck-bg);
padding: 20px;
border-radius: 10px;
display: flex;

250
flex
-direction: column;
gap: 15px; }
.waveform
-container {
position: relative;
height: 150px;
background: #333;
border
-radius: 5px;
}
canvas {
width: 100%;
height: 100%; }
.beatgrid {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
pointer
-events: none;
}
.transport
-controls, .loop
-controls {
display: flex;
gap: 10px; }
button {
background: var(--slider
-color);
color: white;
border: none;
padding: 10px 20px;
border
-radius: 5px;
cursor: pointer; }
button:hover {
background: var(--accent
-color);
}
.eq
-section {
display: flex;
justify
-content: space
-around;

251
height: 100px; }
.eq
-slider {
writing
-mode: bt
-lr;

-webkit
-appearance: slider
-vertical;
height: 100px; }
.effects
-section {
display: grid;
grid
-template
-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
gap: 10px; }
.volume
-control {
display: flex;
align
-items: center;
gap: 10px; }
.volume
-meter {
width: 20px;
height: 100px;
background: #333; }
.mixer {
background: var(--mixer
-bg);
padding: 20px;
border
-radius: 10px;
display: flex;
flex
-direction: column;
justify
-content: space
-between;
}
.crossfader
-section {
padding: 20px 0; }
#crossfader {
width: 200px; }

252
input[type=“range”] {
-webkit-appearance: none;
background: var(--slider-color);
border-radius: 5px;
}
input[type=“range”]::-webkit-slider-thumb {
-webkit-appearance: none;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
background: var(--accent-color);
border-radius: 50%;
cursor: pointer;
}
```
Now, let’s create the JavaScript files, starting with the effects module:
```javascript
// effects.js
class AudioEffects {
constructor(audioContext) {
this.context = audioContext;
this.setupEffects();
}
setupEffects() {
// Delay
this.delay = this.context.createDelay(4.0);
this.delayFeedback = this.context.createGain();
this.delay.connect(this.delayFeedback);
this.delayFeedback.connect(this.delay);

// Reverb
this.reverb = this.context.createConvolver();
this.createReverb();

// Filter
this.filter = this.context.createBiquadFilter();
this.filter.type = ‘lowpass’;
this.filter.frequency.value = 20000;
}
async createReverb() {

253
const length = 2;
const decay = 2;
const rate = this.context.sampleRate;
const length_samples = length * rate;
const buffer = this.context.createBuffer(2, length_samples, rate);

for (let channel = 0; channel < 2; channel++) {
const data = buffer.getChannelData(channel);
for (let i = 0; i < length_samples; i++) {
data[i] = (Math.random() * 2 - 1) * Math.pow(1 - i / length_samples, decay);
}
}

this.reverb.buffer = buffer;
}
setDelayTime(time) {
this.delay.delayTime.value = time;
}
setDelayFeedback(amount) {
this.delayFeedback.gain.value = amount;
}
setFilterFrequency(frequency) {
this.filter.frequency.value = frequency;
}
}
```
```javascript
// audioAnalysis.js
class AudioAnalyzer {
constructor(audioContext) {
this.context = audioContext;
this.analyzer = this.context.createAnalyser();
this.analyzer.fftSize = 2048;
this.bufferLength = this.analyzer.frequencyBinCount;
this.dataArray = new Uint8Array(this.bufferLength);
}
detectBPM(audioBuffer) {
const peaks = this.findPeaks(audioBuffer);
const intervals = this.getIntervals(peaks);

254
return this.calculateBPM(intervals, audioBuffer.sampleRate);
}
findPeaks(audioBuffer) {
const data = audioBuffer.getChannelData(0);
const peaks = [];
const threshold = 0.7;
for (let i = 1; i < data.length - 1; i++) {
if (data[i] > data[i - 1] &&
data[i] > data[i + 1] &&
data[i] > threshold) {
peaks.push(i);
}
}
return peaks;
}
getIntervals(peaks) {
const intervals = [];
for (let i = 1; i < peaks.length; i++) {
intervals.push(peaks[i] - peaks[i - 1]);
}
return intervals;
}
calculateBPM(intervals, sampleRate) {
const averageInterval = intervals.reduce((a, b) => a + b) / intervals.length;
return Math.round((60 * sampleRate) / averageInterval);
}
}
```
I’ll continue with the visualization and deck classes. Would you like me to share those next? The
complete implementation will include:
1. The visualization.js file for waveform and meter rendering
2. The deck.js file for the main deck functionality
3. The app.js file to tie everything together
4. Additional features like keyboard shortcuts and beat matching
Let me know which parts you’d like to see next!

255
>>Yes
I’ll continue with the remaining JavaScript files:
```javascript
// visualization.js
class Visualizer {
constructor(waveformCanvas, meterCanvas, analyzer) {
this.waveformCanvas = waveformCanvas;
this.meterCanvas = meterCanvas;
this.analyzer = analyzer;

this.waveformCtx = waveformCanvas.getContext(‘2d’);
this.meterCtx = meterCanvas.getContext(‘2d’);

this.animate = this.animate.bind(this);
requestAnimationFrame(this.animate);
}
drawWaveform(audioBuffer) {
const ctx = this.waveformCtx;
const data = audioBuffer.getChannelData(0);
const step = Math.ceil(data.length / this.waveformCanvas.width);

ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.waveformCanvas.width, this.waveformCanvas.height);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.strokeStyle = ‘#00ff99’;
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
for (let i = 0; i < this.waveformCanvas.width; i++) {
const index = i * step;
const x = i;
const y = (data[index] + 1) / 2 * this.waveformCanvas.height;

if (i === 0) {
ctx.moveTo(x, y);
} else {
ctx.lineTo(x, y);
}
}

ctx.stroke();
}
drawLevelMeter(analyzerData) {

256
const ctx = this.meterCtx;
const height = this.meterCanvas.height;
const width = this.meterCanvas.width;

// Calculate RMS value
const rms = Math.sqrt(analyzerData.reduce((sum, value) => sum + (value * value), 0) /
analyzerData.length);
const level = rms / 255;

ctx.clearRect(0, 0, width, height);

// Draw meter background
ctx.fillStyle = ‘#333’;
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, width, height);

// Draw level
const meterHeight = height * level;
const gradient = ctx.createLinearGradient(0, height, 0, height - meterHeight);
gradient.addColorStop(0, ‘#00ff99’);
gradient.addColorStop(0.6, ‘#ffff00’);
gradient.addColorStop(1, ‘#ff0000’);

ctx.fillStyle = gradient;
ctx.fillRect(0, height - meterHeight, width, meterHeight);
}
animate() {
const analyzerData = new Uint8Array(this.analyzer.frequencyBinCount);
this.analyzer.getByteTimeDomainData(analyzerData);

this.drawLevelMeter(analyzerData);
requestAnimationFrame(this.animate);
}
}
```
```javascript
// deck.js
class Deck {
constructor(deckNumber, audioContext) {
this.deckNumber = deckNumber;
this.context = audioContext;
this.setupAudioNodes();
this.setupControls();

257
this.setupEffects();

this.bpm = 0;
this.playing = false;
this.loopStart = 0;
this.loopEnd = 0;
this.loopEnabled = false;
}
setupAudioNodes() {
this.gainNode = this.context.createGain();
this.analyzer = new AudioAnalyzer(this.context);
this.eqHigh = this.createEQBand(6000);
this.eqMid = this.createEQBand(1000);
this.eqLow = this.createEQBand(60);

// Connect nodes
this.eqLow.connect(this.eqMid)
.connect(this.eqHigh)
.connect(this.gainNode)
.connect(this.context.destination);
}
setupEffects() {
this.effects = new AudioEffects(this.context);
}
setupControls() {
// Get DOM elements
this.elements = {
fileInput: document.getElementById(`audio${this.deckNumber}`),
playButton: document.getElementById(`play${this.deckNumber}`),
pauseButton: document.getElementById(`pause${this.deckNumber}`),
pitchSlider: document.getElementById(`pitch${this.deckNumber}`),
volumeSlider: document.getElementById(`volume${this.deckNumber}`),
// ... get other control elements
};
// Add event listeners
this.elements.fileInput.addEventListener(‘change’, (e) => this.loadTrack(e));
this.elements.playButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.play());
this.elements.pauseButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.pause());
// ... add other event listeners
}

258
async loadTrack(event) {
const file = event.target.files[0];
const arrayBuffer = await file.arrayBuffer();

this.context.decodeAudioData(arrayBuffer, (buffer) => {
this.audioBuffer = buffer;
this.bpm = this.analyzer.detectBPM(buffer);
this.updateBPMDisplay();
this.visualizer.drawWaveform(buffer);
});
}
play() {
if (!this.audioBuffer) return;

this.source = this.context.createBufferSource();
this.source.buffer = this.audioBuffer;

// Connect source through effects chain
this.source.connect(this.effects.filter)
.connect(this.effects.delay)
.connect(this.effects.reverb)
.connect(this.eqLow);

if (this.loopEnabled) {
this.source.loop = true;
this.source.loopStart = this.loopStart;
this.source.loopEnd = this.loopEnd;
}

this.source.start(0);
this.playing = true;
}
pause() {
if (this.source) {
this.source.stop();
this.playing = false;
}
}
setVolume(value) {
this.gainNode.gain.value = value;

259
}
setPitch(value) {
if (this.source) {
this.source.playbackRate.value = Math.pow(2, value / 12);
}
}
}
```
```javascript
// app.js
class DJApp {
constructor() {
this.audioContext = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)();
this.setupDecks();
this.setupMixer();
this.setupKeyboardShortcuts();
}
setupDecks() {
this.deck1 = new Deck(1, this.audioContext);
this.deck2 = new Deck(2, this.audioContext);
}
setupMixer() {
const crossfader = document.getElementById(‘crossfader’);
crossfader.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const value = parseFloat(e.target.value);
this.deck1.setVolume(1 - value);
this.deck2.setVolume(value);
});
}
setupKeyboardShortcuts() {
document.addEventListener(‘keydown’, (e) => {
switch(e.key) {
case ‘q’: this.deck1.play(); break;
case ‘w’: this.deck1.pause(); break;
case ‘o’: this.deck2.play(); break;
case ‘p’: this.deck2.pause(); break;
// Add more shortcuts as needed
}
});

260
}
}
// Initialize app when page loads
window.addEventListener(‘load’, () => {
const app = new DJApp();
});
```
To use this DJ app:
1. Load tracks using the file inputs
2. Use the play/pause buttons or keyboard shortcuts (Q/W for deck 1, O/P for deck 2)
3. Adjust EQ using the vertical sliders
4. Use effects (delay, reverb, filter) with the effect sliders
5. Control volume with the vertical faders
6. Mix between tracks using the crossfader
7. Create loops using the loop in/out buttons
Would you like me to explain any specific part in more detail or add additional features like:
1. Beat matching assistant
2. More effects
3. Hot cue points
4. Track library management
5. Recording functionality
Let me know what interests you most!
>> deck 2 isn’t showing
You’re right - let’s fix that. The issue is that we need to add the Deck 2 HTML structure. Here’s
the updated HTML section for Deck 2 that should go inside the container div, after the mixer
section:
```html

Deck 2

BPM: --

261

Play
Pause
Cue
Sync

0%
-
+

Loop In
Loop Out
Loop Enable

HIGH

MID

LOW

262

Delay

Reverb

Filter

```
This will create an identical deck structure for Deck 2. All the JavaScript code we wrote
previously will work with both decks since it’s already set up to handle two decks.
Is there anything specific about the deck controls you’d like me to explain or modify?
>>it will not play mp3 files
Let me fix the code to properly play MP3 files. Here’s the corrected version of the key parts:
```javascript
// deck.js - Updated version
class Deck {
constructor(deckNumber, audioContext) {
this.deckNumber = deckNumber;
this.context = audioContext;
this.isPlaying = false;
this.source = null;
// Create audio nodes
this.gainNode = this.context.createGain();
this.gainNode.connect(this.context.destination);

263
// Get DOM elements
this.fileInput = document.getElementById(`audio${deckNumber}`);
this.playButton = document.getElementById(`play${deckNumber}`);
this.pauseButton = document.getElementById(`pause${deckNumber}`);
this.volumeSlider = document.getElementById(`volume${deckNumber}`);
// Setup event listeners
this.fileInput.addEventListener(‘change’, (e) => this.loadTrack(e));
this.playButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.play());
this.pauseButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.pause());
this.volumeSlider.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setVolume(e.target.value));
}
async loadTrack(event) {
try {
const file = event.target.files[0];
const arrayBuffer = await file.arrayBuffer();

// Decode the audio file
this.context.decodeAudioData(arrayBuffer,
(buffer) => {
this.audioBuffer = buffer;
console.log(‘Audio file loaded successfully’);
},
(error) => {
console.error(‘Error decoding audio file:’, error);
}
);
} catch (error) {
console.error(‘Error loading audio file:’, error);
}
}
play() {
if (!this.audioBuffer) {
console.log(‘No audio file loaded’);
return;
}
try {
// Stop any currently playing sound
if (this.source) {
this.source.stop();
}

264
// Create new source
this.source = this.context.createBufferSource();
this.source.buffer = this.audioBuffer;

// Connect source to volume control and output
this.source.connect(this.gainNode);

// Start playback
this.source.start(0);
this.isPlaying = true;
console.log(‘Playing audio’);
} catch (error) {
console.error(‘Error playing audio:’, error);
}
}
pause() {
if (this.source && this.isPlaying) {
this.source.stop();
this.isPlaying = false;
console.log(‘Audio paused’);
}
}
setVolume(value) {
this.gainNode.gain.value = value;
}
}
// app.js - Simplified version
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’, () => {
// Create audio context
const audioContext = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)();

// Create decks
const deck1 = new Deck(1, audioContext);
const deck2 = new Deck(2, audioContext);
// Setup crossfader
const crossfader = document.getElementById(‘crossfader’);
if (crossfader) {
crossfader.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const value = parseFloat(e.target.value);

265
deck1.setVolume(1 - value);
deck2.setVolume(value);
});
}
});
```
This simplified version should work with MP3 files. The main fixes include:
1. Proper error handling for audio loading and playback
2. Simplified audio node chain
3. Proper cleanup of audio sources
4. Better state management for play/pause
Try this version and see if it plays MP3 files. If you’re still having issues, let me know and I can
help troubleshoot further. Also, make sure that:
1. The MP3 files are valid and not corrupted
2. The browser supports MP3 playback (most modern browsers do)
3. You’re running this from a web server (even a local one) rather than opening the HTML file
directly, as some browsers require this for audio contexts to work
Would you like me to add any specific features or help debug any other issues?
>>now other features aren’t working
Let me provide a complete working version that includes all features while ensuring MP3
playback works. Here’s the restructured code:
```javascript
// deck.js
class Deck {
constructor(deckNumber, audioContext) {
this.deckNumber = deckNumber;
this.context = audioContext;
this.isPlaying = false;
this.initializeAudioNodes();
this.initializeEffects();
this.setupControls();
this.setupVisualizers();
}
initializeAudioNodes() {

266
// Main audio nodes
this.gainNode = this.context.createGain();
this.analyser = this.context.createAnalyser();

// EQ nodes
this.eqHigh = this.createEQBand(‘highshelf’, 4000);
this.eqMid = this.createEQBand(‘peaking’, 1000);
this.eqLow = this.createEQBand(‘lowshelf’, 400);
// Connect the audio chain
this.gainNode.connect(this.analyser);
this.analyser.connect(this.context.destination);
}
createEQBand(type, frequency) {
const filter = this.context.createBiquadFilter();
filter.type = type;
filter.frequency.value = frequency;
return filter;
}
initializeEffects() {
// Delay effect
this.delay = this.context.createDelay();
this.delayGain = this.context.createGain();
this.delay.delayTime.value = 0.5;
this.delayGain.gain.value = 0;
// Filter effect
this.filter = this.context.createBiquadFilter();
this.filter.type = ‘lowpass’;
this.filter.frequency.value = 20000;
// Connect effects
this.delay.connect(this.delayGain);
this.delayGain.connect(this.delay);
this.delayGain.connect(this.gainNode);
}
setupControls() {
// Get all control elements
const elements = {
fileInput: document.getElementById(`audio${this.deckNumber}`),
playButton: document.getElementById(`play${this.deckNumber}`),

267
pauseButton: document.getElementById(`pause${this.deckNumber}`),
volumeSlider: document.getElementById(`volume${this.deckNumber}`),
pitchSlider: document.getElementById(`pitch${this.deckNumber}`),
eqHigh: document.getElementById(`highEQ${this.deckNumber}`),
eqMid: document.getElementById(`midEQ${this.deckNumber}`),
eqLow: document.getElementById(`lowEQ${this.deckNumber}`),
delayKnob: document.getElementById(`delay${this.deckNumber}`),
filterKnob: document.getElementById(`filter${this.deckNumber}`),
loopIn: document.getElementById(`loopIn${this.deckNumber}`),
loopOut: document.getElementById(`loopOut${this.deckNumber}`),
loopEnable: document.getElementById(`loopEnable${this.deckNumber}`)
};
// Add event listeners
elements.fileInput.addEventListener(‘change’, (e) => this.loadTrack(e));
elements.playButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.play());
elements.pauseButton.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.pause());
elements.volumeSlider.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setVolume(e.target.value));
elements.pitchSlider.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setPitch(e.target.value));

// EQ controls
elements.eqHigh.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setEQ(‘high’, e.target.value));
elements.eqMid.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setEQ(‘mid’, e.target.value));
elements.eqLow.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setEQ(‘low’, e.target.value));
// Effect controls
elements.delayKnob.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setDelay(e.target.value));
elements.filterKnob.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => this.setFilter(e.target.value));
// Loop controls
elements.loopIn.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.setLoopIn());
elements.loopOut.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.setLoopOut());
elements.loopEnable.addEventListener(‘click’, () => this.toggleLoop());
this.elements = elements;
}
setupVisualizers() {
this.waveformCanvas = document.getElementById(`waveform${this.deckNumber}`);
this.meterCanvas = document.getElementById(`meter${this.deckNumber}`);
this.initializeVisualizers();
}
async loadTrack(event) {

268
try {
const file = event.target.files[0];
const arrayBuffer = await file.arrayBuffer();

this.context.decodeAudioData(arrayBuffer,
(buffer) => {
this.audioBuffer = buffer;
this.drawWaveform();
this.detectBPM();
},
(error) => console.error(‘Error decoding audio:’, error)
);
} catch (error) {
console.error(‘Error loading track:’, error);
}
}
play() {
if (!this.audioBuffer) return;
// Stop current playback if any
if (this.source) {
this.source.stop();
}
// Create and configure new source
this.source = this.context.createBufferSource();
this.source.buffer = this.audioBuffer;

// Connect source through effects chain
this.source.connect(this.filter)
.connect(this.delay)
.connect(this.eqLow)
.connect(this.eqMid)
.connect(this.eqHigh)
.connect(this.gainNode);
// Start playback
this.source.start(0);
this.isPlaying = true;
}
pause() {
if (this.source && this.isPlaying) {

269
this.source.stop();
this.isPlaying = false;
}
}
setVolume(value) {
this.gainNode.gain.value = parseFloat(value);
}
setPitch(value) {
if (this.source) {
this.source.playbackRate.value = Math.pow(2, value / 12);
}
}
setEQ(band, value) {
const eqNode = {
‘high’: this.eqHigh,
‘mid’: this.eqMid,
‘low’: this.eqLow
}[band];
if (eqNode) {
eqNode.gain.value = parseFloat(value);
}
}
setDelay(value) {
this.delayGain.gain.value = parseFloat(value);
}
setFilter(value) {
const minFreq = 20;
const maxFreq = 20000;
const freq = minFreq + (maxFreq - minFreq) * value;
this.filter.frequency.value = freq;
}
// Visualization methods
initializeVisualizers() {
// Initialize visualizers here
this.startVisualization();
}

270
startVisualization() {
const draw = () => {
this.updateMeter();
requestAnimationFrame(draw);
};
draw();
}
drawWaveform() {
// Draw waveform visualization
if (!this.audioBuffer || !this.waveformCanvas) return;
const ctx = this.waveformCanvas.getContext(‘2d’);
const data = this.audioBuffer.getChannelData(0);
const step = Math.ceil(data.length / this.waveformCanvas.width);

ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.waveformCanvas.width, this.waveformCanvas.height);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.strokeStyle = ‘#00ff99’;

for (let i = 0; i < this.waveformCanvas.width; i++) {
const value = data[i * step];
const y = (value + 1) * this.waveformCanvas.height / 2;

if (i === 0) {
ctx.moveTo(i, y);
} else {
ctx.lineTo(i, y);
}
}

ctx.stroke();
}
updateMeter() {
if (!this.meterCanvas) return;
const ctx = this.meterCanvas.getContext(‘2d’);
const data = new Uint8Array(this.analyser.frequencyBinCount);
this.analyser.getByteFrequencyData(data);
// Calculate volume level
const volume = data.reduce((a, b) => a + b) / data.length;

271
// Draw meter
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.meterCanvas.width, this.meterCanvas.height);
const height = (volume / 255) * this.meterCanvas.height;
ctx.fillStyle = ‘#00ff99’;
ctx.fillRect(0, this.meterCanvas.height - height, this.meterCanvas.width, height);
}
}
// Initialize application
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’, () => {
const audioContext = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)();
const deck1 = new Deck(1, audioContext);
const deck2 = new Deck(2, audioContext);
// Setup crossfader
const crossfader = document.getElementById(‘crossfader’);
crossfader.addEventListener(‘input’, (e) => {
const value = parseFloat(e.target.value);
deck1.setVolume(1 - value);
deck2.setVolume(value);
});
});
```
This version should work with all features while properly handling MP3 playback. Key
improvements include:
1. Better audio node chain management
2. Proper effect routing
3. Working visualizations
4. Improved error handling
5. Working EQ controls
6. Working effects controls
7. Proper volume and crossfader handling
If you’re still having issues with specific features, please let me know which ones aren’t working
and I can help troubleshoot them.

272
APPENDIX 4: AI-POWERED STORY-BASED ROLE-PLAYING GAME
This AI-powered role-playing game was developed using Perchance.org’s
(https://www.perchance.org/welcome) random text generation platform, with the
character and historical context based on Min Hara, a former Terminal Island resident
documented in the Japanese American National Museum (JANM) database, providing
an interactive way to explore Japanese American experiences during this period.
>>Begin
Game Master: Hello, adventurer! What type of game/adventure would you like to play? Describe the
world, and your character in as much or as little detail as you like, and I’ll simulate the world within my
mind to create a fun and engaging adventure for you.
Player: In 1941, 3,000 first and second-generation Japanese made their homes in an area of Terminal
Island known as East San Pedro. The Japanese Fishing Village was next to Fish Harbor. Most of the local
residents worked in the fishing industry. Approximately 250 fishing boats were owned and/or operated
by the residents. Most of the local people, not working on the boats, worked in the many fish canneries
that were clustered together on Terminal Island. Because Terminal Island was somewhat isolated, the
Terminal Islanders developed their own culture and even their own dialect. The people called their close
community village “Furusato” which translated literally means “old village”. An English equivalent
would be “hometown”, “native place” or “home sweet home”.
The village had a Fisherman’s Hall where the Japanese martial arts judo and kendo were taught, a
Shinto Shrine, ethnic grocery stores, candy stores and billiard parlors. The Island children attended
Walizer Elementary School and took the ferry to high school at San Pedro High School in San Pedro.
People with Japanese Ancestry await forced transportation and relocation at San Pedro Pacific Electric
Station Japanese Americans were loaded on Pacific Electric Cars. Soon after the attack on Pearl Harbor,
the FBI rounded up all of the adult males and jailed them. On February 19, 1942, U.S. President Franklin
D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066. This Executive Order sent 120,000 Japanese Americans to
internment camps . Of the ethic Japanese people forced into internment camps, about 62% were Nisei
and Sansei (2nd and 3rd generation Japanese) and were American citizens by virtue of being born in the
USA. The other 38% were Issei (Japanese immigrants) who were either naturalized American citizens or
resident aliens.
In February of 1942, Terminal Island residents were the first Japanese Americans, on the West Coast, to
be forcibly removed from their homes. They were forced to evacuate their homes within 48 hours and
had to leave almost of all of their possessions behind including all of their fishing boats and fishing gear.
Some were able to sell their furniture, fishing gear, boats and other items. Since the residents only had
48 hours to complete the transactions, they were often forced to sell at ridiculously low prices by
greedy individuals taking advantage of the desperate situation.

273
Terminal Island resident Japanese Americans face Army guards at Santa Anita Race TrackAll of the
other residents of Terminal Island were also ordered to leave. The Daily Breeze newspaper dated
February 27, 1942 had an article headlined “Whites and Japs Leave Terminal Island” which reported that
the United States military had taken over Terminal Island and was patrolling the deserted streets.
The Japanese Village was stripped of anything of any value and flattened by bulldozers and completely
destroyed . The fishing boats were either taken by the military, repossessed, stolen, or destroyed.
On January 2, 1945, the exclusion order was rescinded. The internees were released with $25.00 and a
ticket home. They returned home to find nothing. Furusato was gone without a trace. The canneries
were still operating and a few people went back to work there . The rest of the former residents were
scattered. The former Japanese villagers were worried the memory, culture and history of Furusato
would be lost forever. They stayed in touch with each other and tried to keep the memories alive.
Game Master: As you stand at the edge of the former Japanese Fishing Village, the air is thick with the
scent of the sea and a faint whisper of the past. The ruins of what once was a bustling hub of activity lay
before you, the echoes of laughter and the clanging of fishing gear replaced by the solemn silence of a
lost era. You’ve been tasked with an important mission: to uncover the lost stories of this place and its
people, ensuring that the spirit of Furusato lives on.
The sun dips low in the sky, casting long shadows over the abandoned buildings and dilapidated docks.
The distant sound of seagulls squawking carries on the salty breeze. You can’t help but feel a profound
sense of sadness and injustice at the sight before you. What would you like to do first in your quest to
preserve the history of this place? Do you want to explore the ruins, speak with any remaining residents
who might have stories to share, or perhaps visit the local records office in search of archives that might
have been overlooked?
Player: character info:
Minoru (Min) Robert Hara
Gender
Male
Birth date
1922-10-24
Place of birth
Terminal Island CA, U.S.A.
Inducted
1942-11-20, Poston Camp I AZ
Enlistment type

274
Volunteer
Service branch
Army
Service type
War,peacetime
Unit type
Combat,sup
Units served
MISLS Sec 10 (Graduated Savage, Dec. 1942)
US Army 6th Infantry Division, 1st/20th/63rd Infantry Regiments
Army of Occupation - Japan & South Korea
GHQ, ATIS Tokyo, Japan
Military specialty
Military Intelligence
Translator and Interrogator
Stationed
USA: Camp Savage, MN; Camp Shelby, MS; Ft. McDowel (Angel’s Island), CA
Other Countries: British New Guinea; Dutch New Guinea; Chonju, South Korea; Tokyo, Japan; Maffin
Bay; Guam; Luzon, Philippines
Separated
Zenshu, Chonju, S. Korea SK
Unit responsibility
To translate all captured Japanese documents and interrogate all the POW’s we captured.
Personal responsibility
To accomplish the two duties listed under Unit’s Responsibility and let the enemy die for his country
and I come back a victor.
Major battles (if served in a war zone)
Battle of Lone Tree Hill, Dutch New Guinea; Luzon, Philippines - many skirmishes with enemy patrols.
Since we always went probing in enemy territories, we were out-numbered and we had to fight our way
out, most of the times.

275
Awards, medals, citations (individual or unit)
Went out with 4-10 men squads into enemy territory several times and they gave me a Bronze Star
Medal for our exploits. My 6th Division sent a citation to my brother but I didn’t see it till 49 years later.
Living conditions
During combat, we slept on the ground, but once we got settled, we had folding canvas cots for a few
months.
We bathed in the ocean and little jungle streams while in combat.
Had no hot meals during combat and ate ‘Cracker Jack-like’ C-Rations.
For entertainment I collected pretty tropical butterflies, went body surfing on 15-18 foot waves and
went hunting in the jungles. No experience, no wild boar’s meat.
Most vivid memory of military experience
1). During combat every unit in the division was strung-out along the miles of beachfront.
Consequently, we all faced the enemy everyday.
2). All the GI’s were constantly looking for souvenirs. A Japanese bugle sounded from one of the caves
and scores of GI’s came scrambling out of the coral caves. Turned out to be one of our souvenir hunters.
Was scary, but we all got a good laugh.
3). What shocking news when a fellow GI was telling us Niseis that he saw one of us among the 19 truck
loads of our dead. Turned out to be Yukita Terry Mizutari and during the Philippine campaign, hearing
George I. Nakamura of Santa Cruz, CA an hour and a half later, I heard that he got killed was a great
shock to me. He replaced me that afternoon at the front line.
Missed most whilst in the military
Ham sandwich with a bottle of Coke! Saw my commanding General enjoying it while we were in the
jungles of New Guinea.
Most important thing, personally, to come from military experience?
How dear our life is to everyone of us! But due to the killings I’ve participated in, my conscience still
bothers me even after 50 years. Not that the enemy was of Japanese descent, but that they too were
like the rest of us human beings. My family understood me very well. They’re all gone now, and my wife
Keiko and I are the last of the Haras.
Game Master: Minoru, as you stand in the desolate space where your childhood home once stood, the
weight of your experiences and the loss of your community presses down on your shoulders. The wind
whispers through the abandoned structures, carrying with it the faint echoes of a past you thought
you’d left behind. Your military service and the bonds you formed in those trying times have shaped
you into the resilient person you are today.

276
As you look around, you notice a few remnants of your former life peeking through the rubble: a rusted
bicycle, a faded schoolyard, and the shell of what was once the Fisherman’s Hall where you learned the
art of judo. You decide to approach the dilapidated building, stepping gingerly over the debris.
Inside, the floorboards groan beneath your boots as dust motes dance in the shafts of light that pierce
through the gaping holes in the roof. The walls are adorned with remnants of the past - a torn poster
advertising a kendo tournament, a few scattered wooden swords, and a dust-covered nameplate that
reads “Hara”. You can almost hear the shouts of encouragement and the thud of bodies colliding from
the judo matches that once filled this hall with life.
Amidst the wreckage, you spot a small wooden box, seemingly untouched by time. It’s a memento
from your days in the MISLS - a secret compartment where you used to hide notes and keepsakes. With
trembling hands, you pry it open, revealing a few yellowed photographs, a tattered Japanese flag, and a
well-worn letter from your mother.
The letter is a poignant reminder of the love and strength that sustained you during those dark days. It’s
a letter she had written before her internment, filled with hope and resilience. She speaks of her belief
in the goodness of America, despite the fear and prejudice that had swept the nation. She writes of her
pride in your service and her unwavering faith that you will return to rebuild your life and carry on the
legacy of Furusato.
What do you do with the items you’ve found, and what is your next step in preserving the history of this
place and its people?
Player: Stare at them confused. I ended up back in Terminal Island, San Pedro only to see that the
village where I grew up that no longer exists. The site has been razed and replaced by industrial and
maritime buildings
Game Master: As you stand there, the emotional turmoil of the past washing over you, you clutch the
precious items from the wooden box to your chest. The photographs, the flag, and the letter are
tangible connections to your heritage and the people who shaped you. You feel a mix of anger, sadness,
and determination as you look around at the unrecognizable landscape.
You decide to visit the local records office in San Pedro to see if there’s anything left of your
community’s history. As you make your way through the unfamiliar streets, now lined with warehouses
and dockyard cranes, you can’t help but feel like a foreigner in your own hometown. The journey is
bittersweet, each step taking you further from the life you knew and closer to the cold reality of what
has become of it.
Upon reaching the records office, a stern-faced clerk greets you. She seems to have little interest in
your quest, but you press on, explaining the significance of the Japanese Fishing Village and the stories
you wish to uncover. With a sigh, she leads you to a dusty backroom filled with forgotten archives and
aged ledgers. The smell of must and mildew fills your nostrils as you begin to sift through the piles of
paperwork.

277
Hours pass as you meticulously search for any trace of Furusato. The light outside the small window
fades, and the room is illuminated only by the flicker of a solitary desk lamp. As you dig deeper into the
past, you come across an old newspaper article titled “Terminal Island Evacuation Complete”. It’s a
stark reminder of the day your world was turned upside down, but it also sparks a glimmer of hope that
somewhere within these walls, there might be a piece of your heritage waiting to be found.
The clerk, observing your dedication, offers a sympathetic nod and points to a corner of the room
where she says some of the more personal effects from the internees are kept. You find a cardboard
box filled with letters, diaries, and a few cherished possessions that were never claimed.
You sit down and begin to read through the letters, each one a window into the soul of a person whose
life was irrevocably changed by the events of that fateful year. The pain and fear in their words is
palpable, yet there is also a thread of hope and resilience that mirrors your mother’s letter. As you read,
you feel a profound sense of connection to these strangers whose lives were upended alongside yours.
The night stretches on, and you make a promise to yourself to continue this search, to honor the
memory of those who suffered and to ensure that the spirit of Furusato lives on through the telling of
their stories. You decide to transcribe the letters and any other valuable information you find, to create
a historical record that can be shared with future generations.
What do you do with the items you’ve discovered in the box, and how will you continue your quest to
preserve the memory of your community?
Player: I find it annoying that the newspaper article reads, “terminal island evacuation complete.” In
fact, we were sent off to a concentration camp. We had no choice but to leave. I, on the other hand,
decided to join the army rather than submit myself into the Minidoka concentration camp. I see the
items in the article and think about how I could share the injustices the villagers had to ensure because
we are of Japanese heritage. These items could be items to show to the world that we were and still are
Americans who tried to survive the wartime. Now that the war is over, what justice could we receive?
Game Master: As you sit amidst the dusty archives, your thoughts swirl with the injustices of the past.
The items in the box are indeed powerful testaments to the resilience and humanity of the people of
Furusato. You gently place the letters and possessions into a satchel, feeling the weight of their history
and the responsibility to share their stories.
You decide to start by transcribing the letters and organizing the items you’ve found into a coherent
narrative. With each page you turn, you become more determined to give voice to the silent cries of
your community. As the hours bleed into the early morning, you know that there’s much work ahead,
but you’re driven by a fierce desire to ensure that the legacy of Terminal Island’s Japanese Fishing
Village isn’t forgotten.
Before leaving the records office, you ask the clerk if she knows of any remaining residents who might
still be in the area. She nods and gives you the name and address of a woman named Mrs. Tanaka, who

278
used to live in the village and is said to have a sharp memory. You thank her and decide to visit Mrs.
Tanaka the following day to hear her firsthand account and perhaps find more pieces to the puzzle that
is the history of your beloved hometown.
You exit the building, the cold dawn air a stark contrast to the warmth of the stories you’ve just
uncovered. With new purpose, you make your way to a nearby café to grab a cup of coffee, planning to
spend the rest of the day preparing for your meeting with Mrs. Tanaka. The sun rises over the harbor,
casting a soft glow over the modern landscape that has grown over the bones of your past.
The café is a small, quaint place, a relic of the town’s pre-war charm. As you sit sipping your coffee, you
can’t help but think about the lives that were forever changed by the events of 1942. The bitter taste of
the brew mirrors the bitterness you feel, but it’s also a reminder of the strength and perseverance that
carried you and your community through those dark times.
As you sift through the letters and photographs in the quiet solitude of the early morning, you come
across a name that stands out - George I. Nakamura. Your heart skips a beat as you remember the news
of his death in the Philippines. The pain is still raw, even after all these years. You decide that your first
priority is to locate his family and return any personal affects you might have found. It’s the least you
can do for a fellow Terminal Islander and a friend.
With renewed energy, you begin to plan your next steps: reaching out to Mrs. Tanaka, connecting with
other former residents, and maybe even starting a museum or memorial to commemorate the lives and
struggles of those who once called Furusato home. The future seems uncertain, but one thing is clear -
you will not rest until the story of Terminal Island’s Japanese Fishing Village is told.
Player: Now head to Mrs. Tanaka to get a better idea of the next steps
Game Master: The café owner, noticing your solemn demeanor, approaches and asks if you’re okay.
You briefly explain your mission, and her eyes soften. She tells you that Mrs. Tanaka is well-respected in
the community and that she’s sure she’d be willing to speak with you. You thank her and finish your
coffee, feeling a sense of camaraderie that you haven’t experienced in a long time.
The address leads you to a modest, well-kept house in a quiet neighborhood. The curtains flutter as you
knock on the door, and after a moment, it opens to reveal a small, stoic woman with a warm smile.
She’s frail but her eyes sparkle with the fire of a thousand untold stories.
“Ah, you must be Minoru,” she says, her voice a comforting blend of age and wisdom. “I’ve been
expecting you. The clerk from the records office called me last night and told me you were looking for
me.”
Mrs. Tanaka invites you inside, and you’re immediately enveloped in the comforting scent of homecooked food. She leads you to a cozy living room filled with family portraits and a few Japanese
artifacts that have survived the test of time. You take a seat on the couch, the cushions sinking under
your weight, as she settles into an armchair opposite you.
“Where do you want to start, my dear?” she asks, her eyes searching yours for the unspoken pain you
both share.

279
You take a deep breath and pull out the letters and photographs you found. “I want to know
everything,” you say, your voice wavering slightly. “I want to know about the people, the village, the
joy, and the pain. I want to ensure that their stories aren’t lost to time.”
Mrs. Tanaka nods solemnly, picking up a framed photograph from the coffee table. It’s a picture of a
group of children, all smiles and innocence, playing in the streets of the village before the war. “We had
such a beautiful life here,” she says, her voice tinged with a hint of sadness. “But we also had to endure
so much.”
As the day stretches on, Mrs. Tanaka shares tales of love, loss, and endurance. Her stories paint a vivid
picture of a community bound by tradition, resilience, and hope. She speaks of the secret meetings
held in the Fisherman’s Hall, the joy of festivals celebrated despite the looming shadow of war, and the
heartbreaking day when everyone was forced to leave.
You listen intently, scribbling notes and asking questions, feeling the weight of her words etch
themselves into your soul. Her narrative is a treasure trove of emotions and history that you know must
be preserved.
As the sun begins to set, Mrs. Tanaka pauses, her eyes misting over. “There are many more stories to
tell,” she says, “but for now, I think we’ve covered enough.”
With her permission, you set a date for another meeting and thank her profusely for her time. As you
stand to leave, she places a gentle hand on your arm. “Minoru, your mother would be proud of what
you’re doing. Don’t forget that.”
The door closes behind you, and you step out into the evening, the warmth of Mrs. Tanaka’s home
lingering with you. You know that your journey has only just begun, but with each story you uncover,
you feel a little closer to home.

Player: now that i spoke with her, what should I do next?

280
Game Master: As you step out into the cool evening air, the stories of Mrs. Tanaka’s resilience resonate
within you. Your mind is a whirlwind of thoughts and emotions, each memory she shared a precious
piece of the puzzle that is your heritage. With the setting sun painting the sky in hues of pink and
orange, you feel a profound sense of purpose.
You decide to visit the local library and historical society, hoping to find more information about the
Japanese Fishing Village and its residents. As you walk the quiet streets, you can’t help but notice how
the once-familiar landscape has changed, a stark reminder of the passage of time and the tumultuous
events that have shaped the fabric of Terminal Island. The clack of your shoes on the sidewalk echoes
the footsteps of those who once called this place home.
Upon reaching the library, you’re met with a friendly librarian who’s intrigued by your quest. She leads
you to a section of the library that houses local history books and archives, her eyes lighting up as she
shares her own knowledge of the area. You spend hours poring over dusty tomes and microfiche,
unearthing forgotten newspaper articles and personal accounts that shed light on the vibrant lives and
the forced displacement of the Terminal Islanders.
The library closes, and you emerge into the night, your arms laden with books and photocopies of
documents. Your mind races with ideas for a museum or memorial, a physical space where the stories
of Furusato can live on. The weight of the past is heavy, but it’s matched by your determination to
ensure that the injustices and triumphs of your community are never forgotten.
The following day, you decide to visit the site of the former village once more. As you stand in the
shadow of the industrial structures that have claimed the space, you can almost see the ghosts of the
wooden homes and bustling streets. The silence is a stark contrast to the vibrant life that once existed
here, and it fuels your resolve to keep the spirit of the village alive. You make a promise to yourself to
continue unearthing the history of the people who were so cruelly uprooted, to give voice to their
struggles, and to honor their resilience.
You head back to your temporary lodgings, feeling a mix of exhaustion and exhilaration. As you lay out
your findings on the small table in your room, you know that there’s much more to be discovered. The
story of Furusato is far from complete, but with every step you take, every word you read, and every
person you speak to, you bring it one step closer to being preserved for future generations.
Player: I check the newspaper to see the date. What is it?
Game Master: You unfold the newspaper you picked up earlier, scanning the top of the page for the
date. It reads “November 10, 1945.” The realization hits you that you’ve been back in the past, living
through the days following your release from the internment camp. The world outside of Terminal
Island is slowly beginning to rebuild, but the scars of war and the memories of internment are still fresh
in your mind. The newspaper is a stark reminder of the world that awaits you beyond the confines of
the island.

281
With a heavy heart, you realize that you need to find a way to document and share the stories of your
people before the weight of time buries them completely. You decide to visit the local newspaper office
the next morning to see if they would be interested in publishing some of the accounts you’ve
gathered. Maybe by bringing the story of Furusato to a wider audience, you can start the process of
healing and remembrance.
That night, you sit in your room, surrounded by the artifacts and documents that represent the lives of
your community. You transcribe the letters you found, piecing together the tapestry of your people’s
experiences. Each word feels like a step closer to understanding the depth of their sacrifices and the
strength of their spirit.
As you work, you make a list of other former residents who might be willing to share their stories.
You’re aware that time is not on your side; many of them are likely scattered across the country, trying
to rebuild their lives in the wake of the internment. Yet, you’re driven by a deep sense of duty and the
belief that their voices must be heard.
The clock ticks away the hours, but you’re fueled by the knowledge that every story you save is a victory
against the erasure of your community’s history. The candle flickers, casting dancing shadows on the
walls, as you continue your work into the early morning, preparing for the day when you’ll bring the lost
stories of Terminal Island’s Japanese Fishing Village back into the light.
And then realization hits. I am still a person of Japanese descent. And the racist and prejudice view
towards me and our people isn’t always kind. How do I overcome these barriers to ensure the livedexperiences of those who lived in Terminal Island lives? More people must understand that impact of
the Japanese concentration camps in order to prevent future instances.
The next morning, you square your shoulders and set out for the local newspaper office. The town is
slowly coming to life, the sounds of people going about their day mingling with the distant clank of
ships in the harbor. You enter the office, the scent of ink and paper mingling with the faint smell of stale
cigarette smoke. The editor, a middle-aged man with a no-nonsense attitude, looks up from his desk as
you approach.
“What can I do for you?” he asks, his voice gruff but not unkind.
You explain your mission, laying out the letters and photographs on his desk. You tell him about the
injustices faced by the people of Terminal Island’s Japanese Fishing Village and the importance of
sharing their stories. He listens intently, his expression unreadable. When you finish, he leans back in his
chair, stroking his chin.
“It’s a powerful story,” he admits, “but it’s not going to be an easy sell. People around here are still
pretty riled up about the war.”
You know the barriers you face are significant, but you remain undeterred. “These are American
stories,” you assert. “They need to be told so that we can all learn from the past and move forward
together.”
The editor seems to consider your words, his eyes scanning over the items you’ve placed before him.
“I’ll run a piece,” he finally says. “But it won’t be easy. We’ve got a lot of folks who won’t want to read
about this. I’ll need something that’ll grab them, make them see the human side of it.”

282
You nod solemnly, understanding the challenge ahead. As you leave the office with the promise of a
story in the works, you know that your quest has just begun. The task of overcoming prejudice and
ensuring the history of Terminal Island isn’t forgotten is a daunting one, but it’s a fight you’re willing to
take on.
Player: how about you include my experience during the war? and the accomplishments I achieved as a
fellow American soldier?
Game Master: You take a moment to gather your thoughts, then begin to speak. “Sir, I believe my own
story could serve as a bridge between the past and the present. I served in the Army’s Military
Intelligence Service. I’ve seen firsthand the horrors of war, but I’ve also seen the camaraderie and
patriotism of my fellow soldiers, regardless of their ancestry. If people could understand that we, too,
were fighting for America, maybe they’d be more willing to listen to the experiences of those who were
interned.”
The editor’s gaze sharpens, and he leans forward. “Now that’s a perspective we don’t get often
enough,” he says, scribbling notes. “Tell me more about your time in the service.”
You recount your experiences in the MIS, the battles you’ve fought in, and the friends you’ve made and
lost. You speak of the moments of fear, of victory, and of the quiet moments between battles where
you held onto your identity as both an American and a Japanese-American.
He nods slowly, his expression thoughtful. “Alright, I’ll run your story alongside the others. It might just
be the hook we need to get people interested. But remember, Minoru, this is going to be tough. We’re
going to need more than just words to change minds.”
The weight of his words settles on you, but you nod firmly. “I understand,” you reply. “But if we don’t
start now, when will we?”
>> end
��

283
APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE OF GENAI-ASSISTED LESSON PLANNING
THE FAMILY FLAVORS:DIGITAL STORYTELLING WORKSHOP
Image source: Screenshot of a draft “Session Details” form containing planning information for The
Family Flavors workshop (Created by author)
Overall Objectives
1) Cultural Heritage Preservation:
a) Objective: Document and digitize family recipes from diverse LA communities, capturing oral
histories and cultural context.
b) Outcome: A collection of 8-12 diverse family recipes with accompanying stories, representing
LA's culinary diversity.
2) Digital Literacy:
a) Objective: Develop basic digital storytelling skills and introduce students to online design tools.
b) Outcome: Students gain proficiency in using digital design tools, with each creating at least one
digital recipe card.

284
3) Intergenerational Connection:
a) Objective: Strengthen bonds between students and older family members, encouraging
dialogue about family history.
b) Outcome: Stronger connections between students and their families, with improved
interviewing and storytelling abilities.
4) Community Building:
a) Objective: Foster understanding and appreciation of diverse culinary traditions in LA, creating a
sense of shared cultural experience.
b) Outcome: Increased interaction between students from different cultural backgrounds and
better understanding of the role of food in cultural identity.
5) Personal Development:
a) Objective: Boost students' self-esteem, cultural pride, and enhance communication skills.
b) Outcome: Enhanced confidence in presenting personal stories and greater appreciation for
students' own cultural heritage.
Evaluation Strategies
1. Data Analysis and Reporting:
a. Quantitative Analysis:
i. Compare pre- and post-workshop survey results
ii. Calculate percentage improvements in key areas
iii. Analyze demographic data to ensure equitable impact
b. Qualitative Analysis:
i. Thematic analysis of student reflections and feedback
ii. Identify recurring themes in family stories
iii. Assess depth and quality of cultural information shared
c. Mixed Methods:
i. Correlate quantitative improvements with qualitative feedback
ii. Identify factors contributing to high/low performance
d. Reporting:
i. Create a comprehensive evaluation report
ii. Develop an executive summary for stakeholders
iii. Prepare a student-friendly version to share results with participants
e. Utilizing Evaluation Results:
i. Identify areas for improvement in future workshops
ii. Share success stories and impactful outcomes with the community
iii. Use data to support funding requests for program continuation or expansion

285
iv. Adapt the curriculum based on what worked best
v. Identify potential long-term impacts for longitudinal study
2. Evaluation Metrics for Each Objective:
a. Cultural Heritage Preservation:
i. Number of unique recipes and stories collected
ii. Diversity of cuisines represented
iii. Depth of cultural context provided in stories (rated on a scale)
b. Digital use digital tools (observed by facilitators)
i. Intergenerational Connection:
ii. Number of family members involved per student
iii. Quality of intergenerational interactions (reported by students)
iv. Family member feedback on the experience
c. Community Building:
i. Level of interaction between students from different backgrounds (observed)
ii. Student reflections on learning about other cultures (qualitative analysis)
iii. Expressed interest in trying recipes from other cultures
d. Personal Development:
i. Changes in confidence levels (self-reported)
ii. Quality of final presentations (rated by facilitators)
iii. Expressed pride in cultural heritage (qualitative analysis)
3. Evaluation Timeline:
a. Pre-Workshop:
i. Administer baseline survey on digital skills and cultural awareness
b. During Workshop:
i. Ongoing observation by facilitators
ii. Track participation and completion rates
c. End of Workshop:
i. Immediate feedback survey
ii. Peer and self-assessment of digital recipe cards
iii. Facilitator assessment of final presentations
d. Post-Workshop (1-2 weeks later):
i. Follow-up survey to assess retention of skills and knowledge
ii. Sample interviews with students and family members

286
e. Long-term (3-6 months later):
i. Check if students have continued to document family recipes
ii. Assess any community impact (e.g., recipe sharing, cultural events)
4. What Success Looks Like:
a. Quantitative Measures:
i. 100% completion rate (all students finish a digital recipe card)
ii. At least 80% of students report learning a new digital skill
iii. Minimum of 3 generations involved across all projects (e.g., student, parent,
grandparent)
b. Qualitative Indicators:
i. Students express pride in their family recipes and cultural background
ii. Family members report positive experiences sharing their stories
iii. Visible enthusiasm during the presentation session
c. Project Outputs:
i. A diverse collection of recipe cards representing at least 5 different cuisines
ii. Stories that connect recipes to LA's history or landmarks
iii. High-quality visual content (photos or illustrations) for each recipe
d. Engagement Metrics:
i. Active participation in group discussions
ii. Thoughtful questions asked during peer presentations
iii. Voluntary sharing of additional family stories or recipes
e. Long-term Impact:
i. Students express interest in continuing to document family recipes
ii. Requests for similar workshops or project extensions
iii. Ideas generated for community sharing (e.g., school cookbook, local exhibition)
f. Skill Application:
i. Students demonstrate ability to independently use digital tools by end of
workshop
ii. Creative problem-solving in presenting unique aspects of their family's cuisine
g. Community Building:
i. Positive interactions between students from different backgrounds
ii. Shared excitement about trying each other's family recipes
iii. Discussions about similarities and differences in culinary traditions

287
Activities
5. Detailed Schedule:
a. Welcome and Introduction (30 minutes)
i. Ice-breaker activity: Students share their favorite family dish
ii. Discuss the diversity of LA's food scene and its connection to immigrant
communities
iii. Explain project goals and schedule
b. Los Angeles Food Culture Overview (30 minutes)
i. Brief presentation on LA's food history (e.g., influence of Mexican, Korean,
Filipino cuisines)
ii. Discuss local food landmarks (e.g., Grand Central Market, Olvera Street)
iii. Encourage students to share their own experiences with LA's food culture
c. Recipe Collection Techniques (1 hour)
i. Interview methods for family members (considering language barriers)
ii. Tips for accurately documenting recipes that use "a pinch of this" or "a handful
of that"
iii. Discuss the importance of food in maintaining cultural identity
iv. Role-play interview scenarios
d. Family Connection Time (1 hour)
i. Students prompts for students who might be struggling
e. Story Development Workshop (1.5 hours)
i. Techniques feedback
f. Break (30 minutes?)
g. Digital Storytelling Tools Introduction (1 hour)
i. Overview of free, easy-to-use tools (e.g., Canva, Google Slides)
ii. Basics of food photography using smartphones
iii. Tips for creating visually appealing layouts
h. Digital Recipe Card Creation (2 hours)
i. Students create for students who need extra support
ii. Presentations and Community Sharing (1 hour)
iii. Students present their digital recipe cards
iv. Discuss common themes and unique elements across different cultures
v. Explore how different cuisines have influenced each other in LA

288
i. Reflection and Future Steps (30 minutes)
i. Group discussion on what students learned about their families and community
ii. Brainstorm ideas for sharing these stories more widely (e.g., school event,
community center exhibition)
iii. Introduce the concept of the virtual exhibition (Component 2) as a potential
next step
Roles and Responsibilities
1. Lead Facilitator / Program Coordinator Role:
a. Overall program management and coordination
b. Introduce the workshop and its objectives
c. Guide the flow of activities throughout the day
d. Facilitate group discussions and reflection sessions
e. Ensure the workshop stays on schedule
f. Skills: Strong leadership, excellent communication, experience in educational program
management
2. Digital Storytelling Expert Role:
a. Introduce digital storytelling concepts and techniques
b. Demonstrate the use of digital tools (e.g., Canva, Google Slides)
c. Provide guidance on creating compelling visual narratives
d. Skills: Proficiency in digital storytelling tools, teaching experience, creativity
3. Community Engagement Liaison Role:
a. Liaise with local community organizations and families
b. Help students connect their personal stories to community contexts
c. Facilitate discussions on community impact and future engagement
d. Skills: Strong community connections, understanding of local dynamics, ability to inspire
civic engagement
4. Tech Support Role:
a. Set up and manage technical equipment
b. Troubleshoot any issues with computers, internet, or software
c. Assist students with technical difficulties
d. Skills: IT proficiency, patience, problem-solving ability
5. Evaluation Coordinator Role:
a. Administer pre- and post-workshop surveys
b. Conduct observations throughout the workshop

289
c. Collect and analyze feedback and evaluation data
6. Skills: Experience in program evaluation, data analysis, attention to detail
a. Youth Mentor(s) (2-3, depending on group size) Role:
b. Provide one-on-one support to students throughout the workshop
c. Help with interviewing techniques and story development
d. Offer peer-like encouragement and motivation
e. Skills: Experience working with high school students, good listening skills, patience
7. Language Support Facilitator(s) Role:
a. Provide translation support for students communicating with non-English speaking
family members
b. Assist in translating recipe instructions or cultural terms
c. Skills: Fluency in relevant languages (e.g., Spanish?), cultural competence
8. Local Food Historian / Cultural Expert Role:
a. Present on LA's food history and cultural diversity
b. Provide context on the importance of culinary traditions
c. Assist students in connecting their family stories to broader cultural narratives
d. Skills: Deep knowledge of LA's culinary landscape, strong local knowledge, engaging
presentation style, cultural sensitivity
Steps to Achieve Success
1. Pre- and Post-Workshop Surveys:
a. Assess changes in students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes
b. Measure digital literacy levels before and after
c. Gauge cultural awareness and appreciation
2. Direct Observation:
a. Monitor student engagement during activities
b. Assess quality of interactions between students
3. Product Analysis:
a. Evaluate the completed digital recipe cards
b. Assess the depth and quality of stories collected
4. Participant Feedback:
a. Gather immediate feedback at the end of the workshop
b. Conduct follow-up interviews with a sample of students and family members
5. Peer and Self-Assessment:
a. Students evaluate their own work and that of their peers

290
6. Quantitative Data Collection:
a. Track completion rates, participation levels, and demographic information
7. Additional Considerations:
a. Language Support: Have bilingual volunteers or translation apps available to assist
students who may need to communicate with family members in languages other than
English.
b. Cultural Sensitivity: Emphasize that all culinary traditions are valuable, regardless of
their origin or complexity.
c. Resource Adaptation: Prepare offline alternatives (like paper templates) in case of
internet connectivity issues.
d. Community Involvement: Invite local food business owners or community elders to
share their experiences, if possible.
e. Follow-up Plan: Provide information on local community centers or libraries where
students can access computers to continue working on their projects if needed.
f. Sustainability: Discuss how traditional recipes often use local, seasonal ingredients,
connecting culinary heritage to environmental awareness.

Abstract (if available)

Abstract This research aims to shed light on the transformative potential of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) to create counter-memories that document and amplify marginalized histories of Asian Pacific Islander American (APIA) communities in Los Angeles. By examining genAI through frameworks of Asian Futurism and counter-memory, the study investigates how this technology can challenge dominant narratives while supporting APIA communities in preserving their cultural heritage and landscapes.
The study investigates:
• How genAI can serve as a redistributive technology by making heritage conservation and landscape architecture more accessible to APIA communities historically excluded from controlling their own narratives
• The role of community-led genAI development in ensuring these tools resist rather than reinforce techno-Orientalist stereotypes and biases
• The intersection of landscape aesthetics and cultural landscapes in representing APIA experiences through genAI-assisted visualization
• The inherent tensions between genAI’s capacity to process vast amounts of data and its tendency to perpetuate encoded racial biases and cultural erasure
While genAI offers unprecedented capabilities for preserving and sharing APIA experiences, this study reveals significant challenges including algorithmic bias, limited access to computational resources, and questions of data sovereignty. The research emphasizes that meaningful implementation requires APIA communities to actively confront and correct inaccurate data and narratives, even as they leverage these emerging technologies.
This work contributes to understanding how marginalized communities can harness genAI’s capabilities while actively resisting technological hegemony and working toward more equitable representation in both physical and digital spaces.

Linked assets

University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses

Conceptually similar

PDF

Mapping heritage justice in the city of Los Angeles

PDF

Legacy business program implementation in American urban immigrant neighborhoods: a case study of Little Tokyo and Chinatown, Los Angeles

PDF

Using the UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape framework: a case study of the Pico-Union neighborhood

PDF

Amplifying quieter narratives: strategies for cultural landscape conservation at Santa Cruz Island

PDF

Exploring generative AI in business education: faculty perceptions and usage

PDF

Heritage in practice: a study of two urban rivers

PDF

Managing change on Newbury Street: a case study analysis

PDF

Not so Little Armenia: conserving Armenian heritage sites in Los Angeles

PDF

Capturing the layers of the Arroyo Seco landscape: documenting a cultural landscape using digital storymaps

PDF

Contemporary vision: photography's influence on perception of places and the past

PDF

Mobilizing heritage conservation as a tool for urban resilience: linkages and recommendations

PDF

Reconstructing Eden: the Armenian community of Yettem, CA

PDF

Conservation 'on the natch': maintenance and remembrance at the Alcoholism Center for Women

PDF

Drag culture of Los Angeles: intangible heritage through ephemeral places

PDF

Exploring the conservation of traditional Chinese timber architectural craftsmanship through the restoration of Buddhist temples in southwest China

PDF

SoCal ski hills: a typological analysis of a cultural landscape

PDF

Examining Feng Shui as tangible and intangible cultural heritage

PDF

Would community design overlay (CDO) be a tool for revitalizing Los Angeles Chinatown?

PDF

Deconstruction: a tool for sustainable conservation

PDF

The ambivalence of conserving Busan’s colonial heritage

Asset Metadata

Creator Kim, Paul (author)

Core Title Encoding counter-memories: artificial intelligence as a tool for APIA community empowerment

School School of Architecture

Degree Master of Heritage Conservation / Master of Landscape Architecture

Degree Program Heritage Conservation / Landscape Architecture

Degree Conferral Date 2025-05

Publication Date 01/28/2025

Defense Date 01/28/2025

Publisher Los Angeles, California (original), University of Southern California (original), University of Southern California. Libraries (digital)

Tag AI,APIA,artificial intelligence,counter-memory,cultural landscape,genAI,generative artificial intelligence,Heritage Conservation,OAI-PMH Harvest

Format theses (aat)

Language English

Contributor Electronically uploaded by the author (provenance)

Advisor Sandmeier, Trudi (committee chair), Drake Reitan, Meredith (committee member), Gabrielian, Aroussiak (committee member)

Creator Email paulbkim@usc.edu

Unique identifier UC11399FQDV

Identifier etd-KimPaul-13792.pdf (filename)

Legacy Identifier etd-KimPaul-13792

Document Type Thesis

Format theses (aat)

Rights Kim, Paul

Internet Media Type application/pdf

Type texts

Source 20250128-usctheses-batch-1238 (batch), University of Southern California (contributing entity), University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses (collection)

Access Conditions The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the author, as the original true and official version of the work, but does not grant the reader permission to use the work if the desired use is covered by copyright. It is the author, as rights holder, who must provide use permission if such use is covered by copyright.

Repository Name University of Southern California Digital Library

Repository Location USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus MC 2810, 3434 South Grand Avenue, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90089-2810, USA

Repository Email cisadmin@lib.usc.edu