■rH ■ i H x: Q < D B PQ G O CO S: CM CM ■rH Ü rH G ^ ■P ■rH G ■H ■iH rH ■HP ■HP Ü Ü Ü Ü O ■H O ■H „ _ _ „ COS COS Mis CO (0 u ■H K W ■H M 145 o o o o m (N O I—I I — I O CM O in O O CM rH rH O O CM •H 0\0 •H M H rH H M •H T3 ^ -P g c g c « j ( ü « j ( ü -H •H •H •H M •H M C PC O O O O •H P -H P ^ 'H ^ *H •H •H O M < U p q Q ) M rH >i •H •H O (d *H ( 0 , *H *H H *H *H •H OÆ CO CO o o m E4 ww trjcn w w ■H •H 146 o o o o 00 o I — I I I — I in o I T ) rH IT) O rH O O rH rH •H O CN fH e u O 0 ) O c e c n r c 3 f C J m rH PQ rH fo fd I —I -H 1 —I "H I—I •H •H (N rH •H ■H •H cm -H cm •H ( U 4 - 1 ( ü MH M H M •H •H •H j c î ü x: ü E-î -H 64 -H m I—I •H •H •H U !2 rH rH rH C •H C C CQ •H -H •H H "H "H "H H "H > ü U ü e g c m 44 c m 04 •H 147 table is the percentage of aging content, estimated by the respondent, for each course. Courses with 100 percent aging content were considered gerontology courses. The number of gerontological courses within each school varied considerably. The two universities also having gerontology centers on campus, SDSU and USC, had the largest number of gerontology courses specifically devoted to aging. At the School of Social Work, USC, some graduate courses were designed to meet the needs of those students interested in aging. UCLA was the only school that did not report any gerontology or aging related courses, but the respondent indicated that the generic approach utilized by the school prepares its practitioners to work with all client populations. It was noted that most gerontology courses were of fered at the graduate level. There were a total of four teen gerontology courses (i.e., 100 percent aging content) and all but one were graduate courses. Two schools, CSUF and USC, seemed to have more of a balance between graduate and undergraduate courses. Those courses available at the undergraduate level ranged from 5 to 20 percent aging con tent. Social policy, practice, social welfare, and human behavior/development were the areas in which most gerontol ogy and aging related courses were listed. Variables, such as faculty and student population of the department/school 148 and the types of degrees offered (see Table 1, column 4) did not seem to influence the number of gerontology and/or aging related courses available. Table 3 displays the opportunities for specialization in gerontology within each school of social work/welfare. These opportunities are categorized as minor, emphasis, and dual degree, which are defined in the Definition of Terms (see Appendix C). Three schools offered a specialization in gerontology. USC offered the dual degree (MSW/MSG); CSUF offered a minor in gerontology; and SDSU offered an emphasis in gerontol ogy. These three schools had more gerontology courses (i.e., 100 percent aging content) than schools not offer ing a specialization. There was no significant relationship between the availability of a specialization in gerontology and the size of the student/faculty population of the school. Also^ the types of degrees offered did not affect the presence of an emphasis, minor or dual degree in gerontology. Two schools with relatively high percentages of faculty hold ing doctorates, SDSU and USC, offered an opportunity for specialization in gerontology. Table 4 indicates the opportunities for gerontologi cally-oriented field experiences. It describes the total number of agencies/settings utilized by each of the schools 149 ■H CO •rH -H -H • i H ■ i H H 150 0 r—I m EH CO 0 •H 4J • i H § -P U O CL § s r—I 0 • i H k r—I n j ü •H Co o iH O 4J C O p 0 o o • i H +-> C#P (5'^ c o en -P G a -n I 0 Cn 0 c o < u -P m G C rH 0 ■§ "p ^ œ -H ck E U) ■P a ij 4J o EH 3 4J rH en CL 0 en O in o lO O r- O o LO O CN 00 rH lO LO CN 0 rH CN ro ro rH rH CN CN o •H « +J d p n j p< — “ TJ 0 0 *iH iH Cn4-> ü 0 G ( Q G •p -H rH 0 O Cn 0 Cn EH < « w tJ 0 0 •H N ü "H C rH 0 -H en 4 J rH 0 4J O Eh <: D G O •H -P S •H +J CO G CN rH O CN CN rH I —I S n in ro vo rH r- LO O rH O rH CN CN CN CO LO CO CN in CN rH rH ■ K r- LO H t ro o lO O UO O O CN rH O CN 1 —1 rH CN rH 00 LO lO r- C T L UO ro OL o LO rH o CN rH 00 r^ ro rH in CN c r > o CN o r- o 00 M) D Ui D en < k D CO O 3 D CJ k Ui Q en u en en en o en u n V D G 0 -P G ro 0 •H ü G 0 Cn 0 •H 0 > 0 Ui 0 > en G •H 4J 0 •H rH TJ 0 4J 0 rH 0 P Cn G •H Cn 0 0 0 p 0 Xi -P 0 >i pH g T3 0 4J 0 rH 0 T3 p 0 TJ -P G Cn 0 G G -P O •H OT MH Cn 0 0 Xi o lO TJ 0 N •H rH •H -P G 0 P I P 0 0 0 en 0 0 Pi O O Xi ü 0 0 •H Xi 4J 0 5 0 0 0 5 -P 0 •H rH O 4J e •H TJ TJ 0 0 Xi - rH 4J 0 -P 0 4J G ■8 g 0 0 0 p I p 0 a 0 0 0 S p Ht O o ü 0 0 x i -P G -H 0 rH « G g g O G g +J 0 p MH 0 0 •H O 0 S' 151 as compared to the actual number and percentage of aging related agencies/setting in which social work students were placed. Also presented in this table are the total number of students placed in field experience agencies/settings and the actual number and percentage of students in aging related placements. Those schools with the most aging related field work settings did not necessarily have the highest percentages of students placed in those settings. The interviewee from UCLA reported that the school utilized 50 aging related field work settings and currently placed 100 students in those settings. When asked to list these agencies, the respondent advised the researchers to consult the announce ment of the school for this information. When referring to the announcement of the School of Social Welfare, UCLA, only three specific aging related agencies were indicated. There was no apparent relationship between the avail ability of a specialization in gerontology and the percent age of aging related field experience agencies. There was also no relationship between the number of gerontology and aging related courses in the department/school and the per centage of students placed in aging related settings. Those schools with a large number of available field ex periences tended to have larger student populations. CSUSJ, with the smallest number of permanent social work faculty 152 had the least number of total agencies utilized by the school. SFSU, with the largest percentage of aging related settings (28 percent) placed only 5 percent of their social work students in those agencies. CSUF, which offered the minor in gerontology, only had 9 percent aging related field settings and reported 9 percent of their total students placed in aging related settings. Table 5, Faculty with Gerontological Backgrounds, in dicates the degree of involvement in gerontology of the faculty members teaching gerontology and aging related courses. The specific variable presented in this table is the percentage of faculty, who teach courses with aging content, having gerontological backgrounds. This data was acquired from the respondents* knowledge of faculty members with gerontological backgrounds, such as academic training and/or practicl work experience in gerontology. Only a small percentage (5-15 percent) of the faculty who teach aging related courses in four schools (UCB, SFSU, UCLA, and USC) were known to have gerontological back grounds, and a fifth school (CSUF) indicated that none of its faculty had had specific gerontological preparation. Representatives from three schools (CSUS, SDSU, and CSUSJ) indicated that a large percentage (75+) of the faculty who taught aging related courses had gerontological backgrounds. The professional memberships held by the faculty 153 -r4 rH •H ID •H ID rH ID ID ID •H ID ID ID ID ID ID ID •H •H rH •H •H •H M 154 teaching gerontology and aging related courses in the Gerontological Society and the Western Gerontological Society are also presented. Professional gerontological memberships held by the faculty in the eight schools studied were as follows: Gerontological Society, CSUSJ; Western Gerontological Society, CSUS and CSUF; both, UCB, SDSU, and USC, and "don't know," SFSU and UCLA. The professional gerontological memberships of faculty were not directly related to the extent of aging related content in the school's curricula, as reflected by the number of classes in aging or the availability of geron tological ly- oriented field experiences. CSUF reported none of its faculty having gerontological training, but some faculty did hold memberships in the Western Gerontological Society. Table 6 summarizes the availability of gerontological resources and research in the university or departmental library of each institution. The number of gerontological journals to which each school subscribes is indicated. The number of theses/group research projects and dissertations completed by students of these institutions in the last five years is also delineated. Schools with a specialization in gerontology had the largest number of aging related theses completed within the last five years. USC, with the dual degree program and a 155 ■H -H ro o CN ■H •H ro m o CN m K O o n M - l ro 00 m o •H ■H -H en cn ■H co co 156 center on aging within the university, had the most aging related dissertations completed within the last five years of the three schools offering the DSW. It is important to note that the departmental library at the USC School of Social Work listed only three gerontological journals, but that the library at the Andrus Gerontology Center, located on campus, has a multitude of gerontological resources available. Three schools with relatively large numbers of geron tology cind aging related courses, SDSU, CSUF, and USC, had the most number of theses completed in the last five years. UCB also had a significant number of gerontological course offerings, but did not report any aging related theses completed within this time period. UCLA, with a large number of gerontological journals available had 13 aging related theses completed. Viewpoints About the Importance of Gerontology for Social Work Table 7 details the viewpoints cibout the importance of aging content for social workers held by the respondents interviewed in the sample. Their responses to the impor tance of aging courses to departmental curriculum and the importance of aging issues in social work are presented. The importance of aging issues for the future of social work is also indicated in this table. 157 ■P p g o fd 4-) -P Q ) MH P ^ O w 0 3 O fd O ) 0 O4 Æ (1 ) 0 (ü 0 g ^ ü 0 3 4 -J c •iH '«H ^ d) C 0) O -H -P C n C fd H 1— 1 * fd 0 3 >1 0 -H -p < ü 04 * U 0 fp rH rH p C n p -H * -P 0 4 - > 0 O4 O c 0 ü C N r H C N i - H C N C M f O r H 1—! t H 4^ -P *iH di-H jj t a 0 4 ^ en g V e en p *H g fd -H 0 0 3 W C 1 X 4 Q •p ü rH P "p -P 0 3 d) 13 4 J rH C n C O4 < ü ^ a fd g P M H g -H 4J -P fd 0 M - 4 p p O 0) 0 -p 0 3 0 3 0 (U 04 C C C MH 0 C 3 < i ) g fd 0 0 U 0 3 C •p 4 -3 "P "P d) C 0 3 -H P 4J -P Ü (d M rH >1 0 fd fd g -P 04 • K •• P O4 ü ü fd P Cn*H ^ C M ^ L O ' ^ ' ^ f O L n d) d) S -P -P -P O C ü (U > *P rp rH p 04-H 0 3 P O4 O4 0 6 Cn-H 43 0 3 0 3 g g Oi t 7 > H c Q E h fd fd -p -p g C 43 43 -P -H g 0 3 d) C n g 4J 4 .) 4 .) 43 0 < rH 0 H M M E h C fd rH -P +J 0 1 1 1 i r - ^ 3 c 0 O C n (U rH (N ro ^ < u jq c e rH < -H -p * Xi C n p * c a m < fd * E h Q ) 04 4-j m ^ 3 O a +J -H ( U o 6 ■p ü + j 0 -p c rH • K < fd 0 3 0 -p 0 ü p 0 3 H o p p 04 0 p e o 0 -p -p H u o c c c ü fd fd .. u 4 -3 4 - 3 0 g P P -p i fd 0 0 g E h 4 - 3 Q4 O4 fd P g g -P l3 0 P "P P C g. -PO f d g > i-P g g, -p p fd fd g d) 0 43 -P -P c g 0 > ^ P o 0 g 0 0 >1 ■ H -p g g p +J ha w mh 0 0 g 0 0 5 co 5 U3 < k g 0 S co M > 4J m c o t o t o U P I D U g -H U f c C O Q C O O C O C O 0 1 1 1 i 1 +J D c o U c o U C D U D rH 03 0 rH C M ro ’« a * in c 0 M * 158 All respondents showed continuity on these three at- titudinal questions. USC and SDSU, with centers on aging within the university and both schools offering a speciali zation in gerontology, rated aging issues as being very important to their curricula, to their discipline currently, and to the future of their discipline. These two schools also had more gerontology courses than most of the other institutions and their departmental faculties held member ships in both the Gerontological Society and the Western Gerontological Society. The interviewee from CSUF, which offers the minor in gerontology, rated the importance of aging issues to the school's curriculum and the discipline as being somewhat important. The representative of SFSU felt that gerontol ogy had important implications for the future of social work, but was not very important at the present time. The remaining four educational institutions, CSUS, CSUSJ, UCLA, and UCB, each rated the importance of aging to their cur ricula, to social work currently, and to the future of social work as being important. Table 8 shows the respondents' perspective about courses with gerontological content in their curricula. Topical areas where aging related courses are to be imple mented are categorized as follows; psychological aspects; sociological aspects, social policy, environmental planning; 159 •H ■H •H -H rH ■H -H 00 •H œ rH •H m •H 160 research; practice; and administration. Social policy and practice were the two topical areas most mentioned for planned aging related courses. SDSU is planning to implement the largest number of course areas in aging, and this may be related to the specialization offered in gerontology within the department and to a center on aging being located within the university. Three schools, CSUSJ, SFSU, and USC, had no future plans to include any of these topical areas for courses in gerontology. The respondent from USC stated that with the availability of the dual degree, social work students are afforded the opportunity of taking classes from the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and their needs for gerontological training can be better met in this manner. There was no relationship between the number of existing gerontology and aging related courses and planned courses in aging. Licensing The State of California, Department of Consumer Af fairs, Board of Behavioral Science Examiners is responsible for regulating the licensing of clinical social workers and registering titles of social workers in California. This Board also regulates the licensing of Marriage, Family and Child Counselors (MFCC) and Educational Psychologists. Members of the Board are appointed by the 161 Governor. The Board is composed of three subcommittees and each subcommittee has representatives from the respective disciplines of MFCC, Educational Psychology and Social Work. The Social Work Subcommittee includes four social workers, two representing Licensed Clinical Social Workers and two representing Registered Social Workers (RSW). The other two subcommittees have no direct role in the licens ing of social workers. Katherine Kaplan was the Chairperson of the Social Work Subcommittee until her death on January 3, 1977. Ms. Kaplan represented Licensed Clinical Social Workers on the Board and was a member of the Clinical Social Workers Society. This Society was instrumental in lobbying for the LCSW regulating legislation. Ms. Kaplan's expertise was in clinical counseling with adults and children. She had no specialized training in aging. Upon her death, Ms. Lola Selby replaced her as the Chairperson of the Subcommittee. Konrad Fischer served on the Board until October, 19 76 and has yet to be replaced. He also represented LCSW's and is a member of the Clinical Social Workers Society. Mr. Fischer worked at a private counseling clinic in San Jose and accepted clients of all ages. Ms. Selby did not know if Mr. Fischer had any experience in working with the elderly. Lola Selby, the present Chairperson of the Social Work 162 Subcommittee, has been a member of the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners since August, 19 76. Ms. Selby has both the LCSW and the RSW, but is currently representing the RSW's on the Board. She is a professor emeritus at the University of Southern California's School of Social Work, Ms, Selby had direct experience working with older adults when she was responsible for an Old Age Assistance case load in California when the Social Security Act was first enacted in 19 35. Herman Fogata is the fourth member of the Board and was appointed at the same time as Ms. Selby. Mr. Fogata represents RSW's and presently administers El Arco, a pro gram for the developmentally disabled in East Los Angeles. Ms, Selby did not know if Mr, Fogata had any experience in working with or on behalf of the elderly. At this writing, only two social work subcommittee positions are filled and both members represent RSW's. Until the Governor appoints two more members, LCSW's are not represented on the Board. Ms. Selby mentioned plans to appoint more public members to the Board, as a whole. Public members are usually persons who are not employed in the field, but have some knowledge and concept of the pro fessions the Board regulates. At least one public member will be added to the Social Work Subcommittee. The National Association of Social Workers and other profes 163 sional associations have submitted nominations to the Board but no action has been taken on filling the vacancies by the Governor's office. Of the 9,000 persons with MSWs in California, 4,200 hold LCSWs. At least half of these workers were "grand fathered in" without having to complete the licensing pro cedure when the licensing law went into effect in 1969. Consequently, many of the persons holding LCSW's do not practice clinical social work. Nancy Humphreys, President of the California Chapter of NASW, has never practiced clinical counseling. About 38 percent of the LCSW's are in private practice, mostly part-time. The LCSW is an ex clusionary license as it only involves one area of social work — clinical and social work therapy. Two examinations, one written and one oral, are ad ministered by the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners for the LCSW. By law, the examinations are suppoed to be offered twice a year, but due to lack of funds examinations were only scheduled once in 19 76. The written examination is multiple choice and tests the applicant's knowledge in the following areas: (a) Requirements for the LCSW. (b) Relating practice to various age groups (children, adults, and the aged). (c) General principles regarding the three practice modalities (case- 164 work, group work, and community organization). (d) Therapy modalities (e.g.. Trans actional Analysis, Gestalt). (e) Basic knowledge of professional relationships and ethics, supervision, and frames of reference for interpret ing human behavior. The applicant must pass the written examination in order to qualify to take the oral test. The latest oral examination, which was held in December, 1976, was conducted by several interview teams, consisting of three LCSWs each. The oral test usually lasts an hour, but again, due to financial shortages, it was shortened to 30 minutes, and the general format was as follows: (a) The applicant was invited to present and discuss a case from his/her own practice experience. (b) The applicant discussed his/her theoretical frame of reference upon which the therapy was based and was asked by the interviewing team to make practical application of that frame work . (c) The applicant's skill in diagnostic thinking and preparation of a treat ment plan was tested by the interviewers through in-depth questioning regarding the case presentation. (d) The applicant was able to choose a vignette from several vignettes pre pared by the Board and propose a treatment plan for the client(s) involved. 165 The applicant did not necessarily have any test of know ledge on aging issues unless he/she chose to present a case or vignette concerning an older person. The Social Work Subcommittee of the Board of Behav ioral Science Examiners is responsible for constructing the tests and solicits questions from experts in the various areas of social work. According to Ms. Selby, of the 100 questions on the current written text six (in section b) pertain to aging. Ms. Selby is now involved in making re visions of the examinations and has consulted with Dr. Margaret Hartford and plans to consult with Dr. William Albert, both social workers teaching at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and members of the USC School of Social Work faculty, to up-date and perhaps expand ques tions on gerontological issues. To qualify for taking the LCSW examinations one must: (1) Have an MSW from an accredited school of social work. (2) Have completed 3,200 hours of supervised post-masters, full-time clinical experience, one-half of those hours under the supervision of a licensed clinical social worker. If the applicant is from another state that has no licensing procedures established and can prove that his/her supervisor could qualify for an LCSW, then the person can qualify to take the examination. (3) Be 21 years of age. 166 Summary of the Findings The analysis of the data indicated that the profession of social work, in the State of California, is attempting to educate practitioners for working with and for elderly clients. Of the eight schools surveyed, three programs offered a specialization in gerontology. All the schools presented the opportunity for aging related field experi ences. Seven schools listed courses with some aging con tent as well as several specific courses in gerontological subject matter. Seven schools reported that faculty who teach these aging related courses do have some gerontologi cal training and six schools have faculty holding profes sional gerontological memberships. All schools have avail able literary resources in gerontology. Five schools have future plans to include aging related courses in their curricula. Variables such as the presence of a center on aging within the university and the opportunity for specializa tion in gerontology seemed to relate to the number of gerontology and aging related courses offered through the department. The two variables were also related to a more positive response regarding the importance of gerontology on the three attitudinal scales. It was found that most gerontology and aging related courses were offered at the graduate level. Also, two of 167 the schools which provided a specialization in gerontology maintained a high percentage of faculty holding doctoral degrees. This finding infers that aging content is more likely to be included in a school's curriculum as the per centage of faculty holding doctorates increases. Yet, it leaves in question the adequacy of academic training of social work practitioners who have Bachelors in Social Welfare degrees and work with the elderly. There were no relationships established between the population characteristics of the universities and schools/ departments and the inclusion of aging content in their curricula. While gerontology courses were offered in schools which provide a specialization in gerontology, this factor did not seem to have any relation to the number of aging related field placements and the number of students placed in those agencies. No correspondence was reported between the extent of aging courses offered and the professional gerontological membership of the faculty. The respondent from one school, California State University, Fresno, which offers a minor in gerontology, reported that none of its faculty who teach aging related courses had specific gerontological back ground. But this school did indicate that some of those faculty members did belong to the Western Gerontological Society. These results emphasize both the lack of avail 168 able gerontological training and the lack of academic regu lation of membership in the professional gerontological associations. There was a general recognition by the respondents of all schools sampled regarding the, at least, moderate im portance of gerontology to the profession of social work. The respondent from San Francisco State University felt that gerontology was only somewhat important at the present time but conceded that aging has important implications for the future of social work. Other relations were also noted. A relationship seemed to be apparent between the emphasis of gerontology within the department/school and the amount of aging re lated theses completed by students. However, the present number of gerontology and aging related courses did not seem to relate meaningfully to the school's future plans for courses in this area. Results from the investigation of the licensing pro cedures of social workers in California illustrates impor tant issues for the disciplines of social work and gerontol ogy. Although the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) is one important step toward self regulation, the profes sion of social work has no direct control over the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners, which licenses clinical social workers. The National Association of Social Workers 169 and other professional associations can suggest nominations for the Board, but the Governor's office actually makes the appointments and grants appropriations for the Board's operation. Two vacancies (LCSW representatives) now exist on the Social Work Subcommitte, and on© examination had to be cancelled last year due to lack of funds. Moreover, only one area of social work is licensed. Important issues pertaining to gerontology, which the research on social work licensing revealed, include the orientations of the members of the Social Work Subcommittee of the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners. Only one current or recent member, Lola Selby, had any known ex perience in aging. Ms. Selby is responsible for recon structing the licensing examinations. She is also the new Chairperson of the Social Work Subcommittee since Katherine Kaplan's death. Ms. Selby is a very influential member of this Subcommittee although she was just appointed in August of 1976. According to Ms. Selby, a total of six questions out of a total of 100 questions pertaining to aging were asked on the most recent written examination for the LCSW. Ms. Selby is in the process of revising the written test and has consulted with Dr. Margaret Hartford of the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology concerning current aging issues. This development could be attributed to a number 170 of variables which have combined to bring the disciplines of social work and gerontology into closer contact at the University of Southern California. The presence of the Andrus Gerontology Center and the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at USC has certainly made Ms. Selby more aware of gerontological issues and advancements in the field of aging. Drs. Albert and Hartford have joint appointments at the Leonard Davis School and the School of Social Work at USC. Their common social work orientation with Ms. Selby gives them similar perspectives on professional issues. The dual degree program which the Leonard Davis School and the School of Social Work offer in gerontology and social work has also afforded the two disciplines an excellent opportunity to exchange and integrate knowledge common to the two fields. The oral examination cannot be as easily evaluated as the written test. The content of the oral test depends on the applicant’s choice in presenting a case or vignette. Data on the content of this examination is not obtainable. This chapter has presented the results of this study. Possible relationships between variables concerning the eight educational institutions surveyed were discussed and information about the licensing of social workers was de lineated. The next chapter will examine implications from the findings presented in this chapter. 171 CHAPTER VIII IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY Introduction This chapter will give an overview of this project, discuss the implications of the findings and propose sug gestions for further research in this area. A brief over view of the study will be presented before addressing the issues suggested by the research. Overview of the Study This study attempted to identify criteria of profes sionalism and examine the professional status of both social work and gerontology. Social work's relationship to gerontology and the extent of inclusion of gerontologi cal content in this field's graduate schools in the State of California were also researched. First, an extensive literature review was completed on professionalism, de lineating seven criteria of professional status. Second, the field of social work was evaluated by these profes sional criteria and it was concluded that social work is a relatively new profession, requiring further expansion and 172 continued professional growth. Third, it was demonstrated that social work is involved in aging issues and that social workers do obtain positions that enable them to work with and for aging clients. Finally, the field of geron tology was assessed for its professional status. The authors concluded that gerontology still remains an area of specialization within the established professions, but that further development may be significant in the formation of a new profession. The eight graduate schools of social work/welfare in California were surveyed. Research consisted of studying the bulletins and announcements of the schools and then in terviewing a representative of each program to determine the extent of gerontological involvement within each insti tution. Variables considered included : the availability of gerontological field experiences; the number and per centage of aging content in each course offered in the de partment; the amount of gerontological background of faculty; teaching aging related courses ; the availability of geron tological resources in the school or departmental library; the interviewee's attitudes about the importance of geron tological content to his/her program, for the discipline, and for the future of the discipline; and topical areas of planned courses dealing with some aspect of aging. The licensing mechanism for social workers was also 173 considered. An interview was conducted with a member of the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners, which licenses clinical social workers in the State of California. This was included to determine the extent of gerontological knowledge required for licensure of a professional social worker in this state. Additional information about licensure was obtained from an interview with the Chairman of the California Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and from attending a one-day workshop on the subject sponsored by the NASW. Implications By the criteria established in this study, social work was defined as a profession in its early stages of develop ment. Social work does have some public sanction as evi denced by the legal recognition of the Licensed Clinical Social Worker. But the law which created this licensure is only as effective as the way it is implemented. Pres tige of the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners and new members appointed to the Board are two areas of concern which social workers interested in professional growth must not ignore. The NASW and the Clinical Social Work Society have been effective to some extent in lobbying for legisla tion on the profession's behalf. Support of their efforts, through time and money, seem to be a wise investment for social work professionals. 17 4 other areas of social work may take note of the success of the Clinical Social Workers Society in influenc ing the LCSW legislation and organize or strengthen their own special interest associations for similar licensure. National adoption of the Academy of Certified Social Workers (ACSW) standards is one practical way for all states to conform to a national standard of practice. Private practice and vendorships in social work tend to lead to more autonomy and independence for the profes sion and should be encouraged, NASW and other professional social work organizations should lobby for reimbursement of social work services through Medicare and Medicaid (Medi cal) . These new sources of income would encourage the pro liferation of private practice. Contracts with private in surance companies should also continue to be negotiated. This study illustrates the involvement of the profes sion of social work in aging. As the knowledge base of gerontology expands, social work schools should be eager to incorporate this knowledge in their curricula. If social work does not recognize and act on this need to dis seminate the new information, another discipline, such as gerontology, will fill this void. Social work can more adequately prepare students to work with the elderly by offering more opportunities for specialization in aging. More field work practice and 175 gerontology related courses may be developed. Schools with centers on aging tend to offer more aging courses and op portunities for exposure to the field of aging. Expansion of centers on aging within schools of social work or on the same campuses would certainly provide social work students with this exposure. Continuing education training pro grams in aging for social work practitioners could also be provided by schools of social work or by the social ser vice agencies which serve the elderly. Gerontology, unlike social work, is not defined as a profession according to the criteria established in this study for professional status. The discipline is moving in the direction of professionalization. Some recommenda tions for accelerating this movement can be drawn from the history of social work's progress in this area. Gerontology must establish a distinct body of know ledge. Due to its multidisciplinary nature it could pos sibly bring together existing knowledge in the various categories of aging in a unique knowledge base, such as social work did in its early development. The Leonard Davis School and other gerontology programs throughout the country are developing curricula and research in these areas. Currently, gerontological course offerings within the institutions of higher learning are expanding at a rapid 176 pace. A need exists for the development of a distinct body of knowledge. At present, most of the courses offered are scattered throughout various departments of universi ties. With centralization, duplication can be avoided and a more coordinated holistic approach to training and re search can be perpetrated. The establishment of depart ments or schools of gerontology within higher educational settings may provide a means for assisting the development of the needed knowledge base. While the notion of service is inherent to the practi tioner in the field of gerontology, an identifiable profes sional ideology needs to be developed. This ideology can provide a model for the delivery of services to the elderly as well as supporting the professional development of gerontology. The field of aging has professional associations, the Gerontological and the Western Gerontological Societies. Unlike the NASW, membership is not restricted to persons with specific training in the discipline. Such exclusion ary action may not be advisable until the ranks of quali fied gerontologists are larger. At some point, membership should be restricted to persons who have fulfilled specific academic and/or experiential requirements. Such exclusion ary measures are necessary for the discipline to recognize a certain level of competence. 177 Gerontology must also formulate a written code of ethics which can be applicable to all practitioners in aging. The Gerontological Society is the perfect vehicle for authoring such a code. Its national membership allows for the opportunity of adopting a code of ethics, Due to its multidisciplinary nature, gerontology must be able to synthesize the codes from various professions to create one document agreeable to all gerontologists. In reviewing social work's struggle for licensing, gerontologists can learn two important lessons. Licensing provides a certain legitimacy to a discipline and persons in private practice had greater influence in lobbying for such licensure. Licensing identifies certain persons who have successfully completed the licensing procedure as being able to perform certain services. It happens that the only specialty in social work which is licensed has a large portion of private practitioners (38 percent), The Clinical Social Workers Society actively lobbied for the licensing bill. Private practice seems to allow the prac titioner more freedom in advocating for the profession. Gerontologists may investigate areas in the field which are amenable to private practice and vendorship. Public sanction of gerontology will be enhanced by further development and application of current research findings to benefit the elderly population. Media coverage 178 of new social services and research findings concerning the elderly will certainly encourage the public in its accep tance of gerontologists as experts, capable of voicing and solving the problems of the elderly. Public sanction will also be advanced with the institution of licensing proced ures. The question still remains of who is best trained in delivering services to the elderly. It can be expected that more established disciplines which closely relate to gerontology, such as social work, will lobby against the recognition of gerontology as a profession and against the licensing of gerontologists who perform similar functions to the more established fields. Results from this research effort reveals that social work is providing academic training in aging for its prac titioners. Although all the schools investigated did not have well developed aging related course offerings, they all recognized the need to address aging issues. If other disciplines acknowledge the importance of gerontological courses and issues and act on their recognition of this importance, gerontology as a separate field of study may not be necessary. Suggestions for Future Research This study is only descriptive and exploratory in nature. It has not tested any hypotheses, but has sug gested relationships and assumptions which can be investi- 179 gated in future research in this area. The following are some issues which were suggested by this research, but were outside of the parameters of this effort. Identifying what types of positions social workers are filling in the field of gerontology is an important initial step in further research between the two disciplines. Dis cerning the educational backgrounds of social workers in these positions and their opinions on the need for geron tological training for themselves and for students in social work would help to identify possible trends in aging education. Surveying a national sample of social work schools re garding the variables this study investigated could give an indication of the pervasiveness of gerontological content in social work education. Attitudes of the faculties at schools of social work throughout the country toward the toward the importance of gerontological issues and course content would give a better indication of whether Califor nia is an exception in accepting aging related courses and issues as being of significance. Developing a code of ethics would also entail further research. A survey of the various divisions within geron tology as to what commitments such a code should contain may be undertaken. Is there a consensus among gerontol ogists that such a code should exist? 180 Licensing is cinother very important issues in the de velopment of gerontology as a profession. Social work's licensing history should be studied in a critical way as a model for gerontology's development in that direction. The attitudes of practitioners in the field of aging toward the need for licensure should be discerned along with the areas of the discipline which should be licensed. A survey of the range of positions currently occupied by persons identifying themselves as gerontologists would give an overview of the diversity within the field. Geron tologists in private practice may be of special interest for research purposes. As learned in the study of social work's development toward professionalization, private practitioners have more freedom to advocate the cause of the profession. One may begin this research by surveying the membership lists of the Gerontological and Western Gerontological Societies. The educational backgrounds of the practitioners could also be ascertained. Their views of the educational needs of students who will be filling positions similar to theirs and of themselves and their colleagues could provide plan ning data for future curriculum development. Conclusion This study has provided an opportunity for the exam ination of relationships between social work and geron- 181 tology. The extensive literature reviews have identified the development of social work and gerontology along the professional continuum. The results obtained from this re search indicate that some gerontological training exists within the eight professional schools of social work in the State of California, Social work licensing procedures have been investigated to determine the gerontological knowledge required for licensure. This investigation has also sug gested strategies for the establishment of a licesning mechanism for gerontology similar to those used by social work. In conclusion, the authors hope that the results of this project will provide incentive for further study and action toward the development of gerontology as a profes sion. 182 BIBLIOGRAPHY 183 BIBLIOGRAPHY Atchley, R. Social Forces in Later Life. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1972. Barber, B. Some problems in the sociology of professions. In K.S. Lynn (Ed.), The Professions in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1965. Bartlett, H. and Gordon, W. Building Social Work Practice. New York: National Association of Social Workers, 1962. Beatman, P.L. How do professional workers become profes sional? Social Casework, 1956, 37^(8), 383-388. Beattie, W.M. Concepts, knowledge and commitment : The education of a practicing gerontologist. The Gerontologist, 1970, 1^, 5-11. Bengtson, V.L. and Haber, D.A. Sociological approaches to aging. In D.S. Woodruff and J.E. Birren (Eds.) Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1975. Birren, J.E. and Clayton, V. History of gerontology. In D.S. Woodruff and J.E. Birren (Eds.), Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues. New York : D. Van Nostrand Company, 1975. Birren, J.E. and Woodruff, D.S. Training for professionals in the field of aging : Needs, goals, models, and means. In A.N. Schwartz (Ed.), Professional Obligations and Approaches to the Aged. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1974. Blank, M.L. Recent research findings on practice with the aging. Social Casework, 1971, 5 ^ { 6 ) , 382-389. Board of Behavioral Science Examiners. Laws relating to registered social workers and licensed clinical social workers. State of California : Department of Consumer Affairs, 1975. Boehm, W. The nature of social work. Social Work, 1958, 3 (2), 10-18. 184 Boehm, W. Objectives of the Social Work Curriculum of the Future Curriculum Study I. New York; Council on Social Work Education, 1959. Brearley, C.P. Social Work, Aging, and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 19 75. Breen, L.A. The discipline of gerontology. In A.M. Hoff man (Ed.), The Daily Needs and Interests of Older People. Springfield, Illinois : Charles C. Thomas, 1970. Brody, E.M. A Social Work Guide for Long-term Care Facilities. Maryland : National Institute of Mental Health,1974. Burns, E.M. The American Social Security System. Boston : Houghton-Miff1in Company, 1949. Butler, R.N. and Lewis, M.I. Aging and Mental Health. St. Louis : C.V. Mosby, 1973. Caplow, T. The Sociology of Work. Minneapolis: Univers ity of Minnesota Press, 1954. Carr-Saunder, A.M. and Wilson, P.A. The Professions. London : Frank Cass and Company, 1964. Church, F. Memorandum from Special Committee on Aging. United States Senate, January 18, 1977. Church, F. Memorandum from Special Committee on Aging. United States Senate, February 10, 1977. Cogan, M.L. Towards a definition of a profession. Harvard Educational Review, 1953, 2^, 33-50. Cogan, M.L. The problems of defining a profession. The Annals, 1955, 297, 105-111. Cohen, W.J. Eventful years in programs for the elderly. The Gerontologist, 1962, 2{4), 192-195. Cohen, N.E. Social Work in the American Tradition : Field, Body of Knowledge, Process, Method, and Point of View. New York : Dryden Press, 1958. Cox, H. Professional status of gerontology. The Gerontol ogist, 1976, 16, 453-454. 185 Crampton, H.M. and Keiser, K.K. Social Welfare; Institu tion and Process. New York: Random House, 1970. Bearing, J.P. Emerging health professions. In R.F. Odgers and B.C. Wenberg (Eds.), Introduction to Health Profes sions . St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1972. Degrees Offered by College and Subject. College Blue Book, 15 th edition. New York : MacMillan Publishing, 1975. De Schweinitz, K. England*s Road to Social Security. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1943. Dinerman, M. Options in social work manpower and education, Social Work, 1975, 20(5), 348-351. Donahue, W. Development and current statistics of uni versity instruction. In R.E. Kushner and M.E. Bunch (Eds.), Graduate Education in Aging. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1967. Eaton, J.W. Whence and whither social work? A social analysis. Social Work, 1956, 3^(1) , 11-26. Elliot, P. The Sociology of Professions. New York : Herder and Herder, 1972. Eisdorfer, C. and Wilkie, F. Research in aging : Bio logical, social, and psychological approaches. In A. Hoffman (Ed.), Daily Needs and Interests of Older People. Springfield, Illinois : Charles C. Thomas, 1970. Encyclopedia of Social Work. 16th issue. New York : National Association of Social Workers, 1971. Engel, G.V. Professional autonomy and bureaucratic organization. Administration Science Quarterly, 1970, 1^ , 12-21. Federico, R.C. The Social Welfare Institution. Lexington, Massachusetts : D.C. Heath and Company, 1976. Feldman, F. Professor of Social Work, University of Southern California. Oral interview in Los Angeles, July 7, 1976. Ferguson, E.A. Social Work : An Introduction. New York : J.B. Lippincott and Company, 1963. 186 Fink, A. The Field of Social Work. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 194 9. Fink, A.E., Anderson, C. and Conover, M.B. The Field of Social Work. New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968. Finn, M.W. and Carmichael, P. Introducing pre-profes sionals to gerontology. The Gerontologist, 1974, 14, 476-478. Flexner, A. Is social work a profession? In Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections. Chicago: Hildman Printing Company, 1915. Freeman, J.T. Gerontology and the gerontological society. The Gerontologist, 1961, 1, 162-170. Freidson, E. Profession of Medicine. New York: Dodd and Mead Company, 1970. Goldman, E. Rendezvous with Destiny. New York : Knopf, 1952. Goode, W.J. Community within a community. American Sociological Review, 1957,^^, 194-208. _____. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging pro fession: Psychology, sociology, and medicine. American Sociological Review, 1960a, 902-914. . The theoretical limits of professionalization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The Semi-professions and Their Organization. New York : The Free Press, 1960b. . The librarian from occupation to profession? Librarian Quarterly, 1961, J1, 306-318. Greenwood, E. Attributes of a profession. In T. Tripodi, I. Epstein, P. Fellin, and R. Lind (Eds.) Social Workers at Work. Itsaca, Illinois : F.E. Peacock, 1957. Guinne, K.K. Professional Nurse. New York : MacMillan Publishing, 1970. Hall, O. The stages of a medical career. American Journal of Sociology, 1949, _5^, 243-253. Halmos, P. The Personal Service Society. New York : Shocken Books, Cambridge University Press, 197 0. 187 Harries-Jenkins, T. Professionals in organizations. In J. A. Jackson (Ed.) , Professions and Professionalization Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Hofstadter, R. The American Political Tradition. New York: Knopf, 1948. Hollis, E.V. and Taylor, A.L. Social Work Education. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951. Hollis, F. Casework : A Psychosocial Therapy. New York : Random House, 1966. Hughes, E.C. Professions. Daedalus, 1963, 9^(4), 655-668. Jackson, J.A. (Ed.) Professions and Professionalization. Great Britain : Cambridge University Press, 1970. Kadushin, A. Prestige of social work : Facts and factors. Social Work, 1958, ^(2), 37-43. Kaplan, J. Voluntary organizations. In A. Hoffman (Ed.), The Daily Needs and Interests of Older People. Spring field, Illinois : Charles C. Thomas, 1970. Kastenbaum, R. J. and Candy, S.E. The four percent fallacy. Geriatric Focus, 1973, 1^(3), 2. Kimmel, D.C. Adulthood and Aging. New York : John Wiley and Sons, 1974. Kleemeir, R.W. Gerontology as a discipline. The Gerontologist, 1965, _5(4) 237-239, 276. Kleemeir, R.W. and Birren, J.E. Society and the study of aging. In R.E. Kushner and M.E. Bunch (Eds.) Graduate Education in Aging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1967. Kleemeir, R.W., Havinghurst, R.J. and Tibbits, C. Social gerontology. In R.E. Kushner and M.E. Bunch (Eds.), Graduate Education in Aging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1967. Koller, M.R. Recommended curricula in social gerontology. Geriatrics, 1962, 3^(4, 260-264. Krauss, T.C. Indoctrination of medical students in prin ciples of geriatrics. The Gerontologist, 1963, 3(4), 152-155. 188 Kubie, S.H. and Landau, G. Group Work with Aged. New York: International Universities Press, 1953. Kuhlen, G.R., Kreps, J.M., Kushner, R.E., Osterbind, R. and Webber, I. Research training in aging within the single discipline. In R.E. Kushner and M.E. Bunch (Eds.), Graduate Education in Aging. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1967. Lange, J.D. Local Action Programs: Housing for Older Americans. Washington, D.C.: National Forum on Aging for Local Government Officials, 1974. Laski, H.J. The American Democracy. New York : Viking Press, 1948. Levy, C.S. On the development of a code of ethics. Social Work, 1974, 19^, 207-216. Lewis, R. and Maude, A. Professional People. London : Phoenix House, 1952. Lowy, L. The role of social gerontology in the development of social services for older people. In D.D. Kent, R. Kastenbaum, and S. Sherwood (Eds.), Research, Planning and the Elderly: The Power and Potential of Social Science. New York : Behavioral Publications, 1972. Lurie, H.L. The development of social welfare programs. Social Work Yearbook, 1960, 14. New York : National Association of Social Workers. Marshall, T.H. The recent history of professionalism in relation to social structure and social policy^ Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1939, 5, 325-340. Meyer, C.H. Social Work with the Aging. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Social Workers, 1975. Meyer, H.J. Profession of social work : Contemporary characteristics. Encyclopedia of Social Work, 16th issue, 1971. New York : National Association of Social Workers. . The effect of social work professionalization on manpower. In T. Tripodi, P. Fellin, I. Epstein and R. Lind (Eds.), Social Workers at Work. Itasca, Illinois : F.E. Peacock, 1972. 189 Moore, W. (Ed.) The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Hough ton-Mi f f1in Co., 1969. Moore, W.E. The Professions : Roles and Rules. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 1970. National Association of Social Workers. Building Social Work Knowledge. New York : National Association of Social Workers, 1964. . Information On Legal Regulations of Social Work. New York : National Association of Social Workers, 1971. Pavalko, R.M. Sociology of Occupations and Professions. Florida: F.E. Peacock, 1974. Posz, G.S., Jun, J.S., and Storm, W.B. Administrative Alternatives in Development Assistance. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Ballinger Publishing, 1973. Ritzer, G. Professionalism and the individual. In E. Friedson (Ed.), The Professions and Their Prospects. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1973. Rones, P.L. Social work. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Fall, 1975, 45-49. Schein, E.H. Professional Education, San Francisco : McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972. Schott, R.L. Public administration as a profession : Problems and prospects. Public Administration Review, 1976, 253-259. Seguin, M. Manpower issues in the field of social work with the aging. A report to the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D.C., 1976. Shanas, E., Townsend, P., Wedderburn, R., Friis, H., Milhoj, P. and Stehouwer, J. Old People in Three Industrial Societies. New York : Atherton Press, 1968. Shock, N. Trends in Gertonology. Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, 1957. Shonich, H. The crisis in social work. Social Work, 1972, 17(4), 102-104. 190 Skidmore, R.A. and Tackeray, M.G. Introduction to Social Work. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964. Smalley, R.E. The functional approach to casework prac tice. In R.W. Roberts and R.H. Nee (Eds.), Theories of Social Casework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972. Smith, H. Contingencies of professional differentiation. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 6^, 410-414. Smith, H.K. Aging specialization in schools of social work: A curriculum model for gerontological education in social work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Utah, June 1976. Social Casework. Editorial notes, 1973, 5_4 (8) , 496-497. Social Work Education Reporter. Recommendation on struc ture and quality, practice and education adopted by House. 1976, ^(2), 3, 11-13. Stone, S. and Shertzer, B. Careers in Counseling and Guidance. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company, 19 69. Strauss, A.L. Professions, Work, and Careers. San Francisco: The Sociology Press, 1971. Stroup, H. Social Work. New York : American Book Company, 1948. Tibbitts, C. Social gerontology : A new approach to under standing aging. In C. Vedder (Ed.) , Gerontology : A Book of Readings. Springfield, Illinois : Charles C. Thomas, 1963. ______ . Social gerontology in education for the professions In R.E. Kushner and M.E. Bunch (eds.), Graduate Educa tion in Aging. Ann Arbor; University of Michigan, 1967 Toren, N. Social Work : A Case of the Semi-Profession. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications. Towley, L. N.A.S.W.: A professional step. Social Work, 1956, 1(1), 109-112. Turner, C. and Hodge, M.N. Occupations and professions. In J.A. Jackson (Ed.), Professions and Professionaliza tion. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1970. 191 U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Social Security Programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Human Development, Administration on Aging. National Director of Educational Programs in Gerontology. First Edition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976, Vickery, F.E. Creative Planning for Older Adults. New York: Association Press, 1972. Vollmer, H.M. and Mills, D.L. (Eds.) Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966. Wasser, E. Protective practice in serving the mentally impaired aged. Social Casework, 1971, ^(8), 510-522. Wickenden, W.E. Quoted from The General Manager. Great Britain: British Institute of Management, 1950. Wilensky, H.L. The professionalization of everyone. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 137-158. 192 APPENDIX A 193 INFORMATION COLLECTION FORM - LDS STUDENTS, PROFESSIONALISM PROJECT 1. Name of Institution (1-3) 2. Name of department/discipline (4-5) 3. Types of degrees/certificates offered by department Certificates : (6-20) Bachelors : (21-30) Masters : (31-40) Academic doctorate (indicate speciality) Professional doctorate : (80=1) 194 Do courses in the departmental curricula - as indicated in the course catalog description - contain content re lated to gerontology? (1) 1 Yes 2 No If YES, list course titles and check appropriate spaces (2-76, 77, 78, 79) (80=2) Required Overview Graduate 195 5. Does the department offer a dual degree, minor or emphasis in gerontology at the graduate level? Check all categories which apply. (1-4) 1_ None 2 Dual Degree 3 Minor 4 Emphasis 6. Does the department require a field practicum, intern ship , or traineeship? (5) 1 Yes 2__ No 7. What is the student population of the institution? (6-8) ____________# of students 8. What is the total number of faculty members comprising the department? (-10) . ________# of faculty members 9. What is the total number of faculty holding doctorates within the department? (11-12) ____________# of faculty members 10. On a scale from one to seven, using the information you have assimilated from reading the university catalog of your department, rate the extent to which this de partment incorporates the subject matter of gerontol ogy into its department curriculm. (13) Does not incorporate Does incorporate gerontological subject gerontological subject matter matter 11. Is there anything else, not on this data collection form that you would like to address yourself to in terms of how this department relates to the field of gerontology? Please respond freely (14-79) (80=3) 196 12. Does department/school have a division of continuing education? (1) 1 Yes 2 No If YES, please list the course titles containing aging (i.e., gerontological) content within the continuing education curriculum. (2-78) Course titles : (80=4) 197 APPENDIX B 198 INTERVIEW DATA COLLECTION FORM 1. What is your name and complete title, inclusive of discipline? (1-2) 2. What is the number of students enrolled in your department/schoo1? ^ ^ ^ ^____________# of students 3. If applicable, please list the course titles containing aging (i.e., gerontological) content within your de partmental/school curricula, and please estimate what percentage of each course is devoted to aging content. (6-79, 80=5, 1-6) Course titles % If applicable, do the instructors teaching the above courses hold membership in the Gerontological Society (GS), or the Western Gerontological Society (WGS)? (7) 1 GS 2 WGS 3 Both 4 Don » t know 199 4. If your department requires a field practicum, trainee ship, or internship - What is the total number of agencies/settings being utilized? (8-9) ________ Total # of agencies/settings being util ized About how many students are placed in such agencies/ settings? (10-12) ________ # of students placed in all agencies/ settings utilized About how many agency/settings, which provide students with the opportunity to work with or on behalf of older adults, are being utilized? (13-14) # of agencies which provide students with the opportunity to work with or on behalf of older adults. About how many students are placed in these agencies/ settings? (15-17) ________ # of students placed in agencies/settings which provide opportunity to work with or on behalf of older adults If applicable, would you please list the names of the agencies/settings being utilized which provide students with the opportunity to work with or on behalf of older adults (18, 19, 20-21) Names of agencies : 200 5. How important would you rate courses with aging (i.e., gerontological) content, in relation to your total departmental/ school curriculum? (22) 1 Of no importance 2__Not very important 3 Somewhat important 4 5 Important Very important How important would you rate aging (i.e., ger ontological) issues, in comparison with all other issues your pro fession is concerned with? (23) 1 Of no importance 2__Not very important 3__Somewhat important 4 Important 5 Very important If applicable, about how many doctoral dissertations and masters theses related to aging (i.e., gerontol ogy) have been completed in your department/school since 1971? (24-25, 26-27) # of dissertations related to aging completed since 1971 _____# of masters theses related to aging 8. completed since 1971 To which of the following journals does your depart mental/school library subscribe? Please check all that apply. (28-50) _____Aging Aging and Human Development "American Geriatrics Society Current Literature on Aging 'Developments in Aging Educational Gerontology Experimental Aging Research Geriatrics H uman De ve 1 opme n t Industrial Gerontology Journal of Gerontology Journal of Gerontological Nursing The Gerontologist Any other aging related journals? If YES, please list them 201 Do you plan to implement aging related courses into your departmental/school curriculum within the next 2 years, or 3 to 5 years? (51) 1 Within next 2 years 2 Within next 3 to 5 yrs If you do not plan to implement aging related courses into your school/departmental curriculum, is it be cause of - (Please check all that apply). (52-57) 1__Lack of money 4___Lack of faculty interest 2__Lack of qualified 5___Lack of relevance for faculty to teach your discipline courses 6___Other reasons, please 3 Lack of student specify interest If you do plan to implement aging related courses in to your school/departmental curriculum within the next 1 to 5 years, in what topical areas of your discipline would such courses be implemented? Please list such areas. (57-79, 80=6, 1-40) Topical areas where aging related courses would be implemented: 10. If applicable, what percentage of your faculty, who teach aging related courses, have specific gerontol ogy training? (41) 1 5-15% 2 15-25% 3 25-35% 4 35-50% 5 50-75% 6 75+% 202 11. If applicable, do you feel that faculty who teach your aging related courses should have specific gerontological training? (42) 1__Yes 2 No 12. Do you feel that the content (i.e. , subject matter) of gerontology has important implications for the future of your discipline? (43) 1__It has very important implications 2__It has important implications 3__Its implications are slightly important 4__The implications of gerontology have no importance for my discipline This interview was - (44, 80=7) 1___ Face to face 2__Over the telephone THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION 203 APPENDIX C 204 DEFINITION OF TERMS The following are operational definitions of terms which are being used within specific parameters for the purposes of this study; Generic Terms 1. Gerontology is a multidisciplinary study of the pro cesses and the phenomena of aging, including knowledge from the biological, psychological, sociological and the behavioral sciences. 2. A profession is an occupation which requires a liberal education and meets the following criteria: (1) a body of knowledge; (2) a university education; (3) a code of ethics; (4) professional association; (5) public sanc tion ; (6) professional ideology ; and (7) self-regula tion. All criteria need not be fully developed, but the discipline must be progressing along the continuum of professionalism to be considered a profession. 3. References to the elderly, older adults and the aged at all times refer to those persons sixty years of age and older. Educational Terms 4. Course Offerings are those classes indicated in the course catalog or in response to the interview ques tionnaire which are available to students in the in stitutions studied. 5. Required courses are courses which need to be taken in order to meet the specifications of the program as listed in the course catalog. 6. A major is the principal field of academic specializa tion of a candidate for a degree in a college or university (Morris, 1969). 7. A minor is an area of specialized study of a degree candidate in a college or university which requires fewer class hours or credits than a major (Morris, 1969). 205 8. An overview course is an introductory course with no specified prerequisites. 9. An area of emphasis is not specified in the catalog^ but applies to twelve or more semester units in a subject which are taken by a student, 10. Graduate courses are those courses which are offered beyond the bachlors degree and are usually specialized or professional. 11. Field experiences are supervised work situations in which theoretical material learned in the classroom may be applied in an out-of-classroom setting. Uni versity credit is usually but not always earned for field experiences. For the purposes of this investi gation, practicum and internship are considered synonymous with field experience, 12. Dual degree is to mean that a student has earned, in addition to a degree in gerontology, another degree in a related area such as social work or public administration. 13. Doctoral degrees a. For purposes of quantifying data for this study, Ph.D.'s and D.Sci. degrees are being classified as academic doctorates. b. All other doctoral degrees are being classified as professional degrees. 14. Faculty included in this study are limited to full time teaching employees of the educational institu tions as indicated in the university catalogs. 206 APPENDIX D 207 DATA FROM TEST-RETEST FOR RET.T, ABILITY | QUESTION #5 How important would you rate courses with aging Ci,e/. gerontological content, in relation to your total depart- mental/school curriculum? 1 Of no importance 2 Not very important 3 Somewhat important 4 Important 5 Very important SUBJECTS TEST SCORE RETEST DIFFERENCE 1 5 5 0 2 4 3 1 3 5 5 0 4 5 5 0 5 4 4 0 6 4 3 1 7 5 5 0 8 5 5 0 9 5 5 0 10 3 4 1 11 4 4 0 12 5 5 0 13 5 5 0 14 5 5 0 15 4 5 0 Spearman rank-order coefficient of correlation = T = 1 — 6 D h(n-l) r = 0.9953 At the .01 level of significance, the critical value is 0.715. The null hypothesis is rejected and a positive correlation is demonstrated between the answers given on the test and the retest for question #5. 208 APPENDIX E 209 DATA FROM TEST-RETEST FOR RELIABILITY, QUESTION #6 How important would you rate aging (i.e., gerontological) issues in comparison with all other issues your profession is concerned with? 1 Of no importance 2 Not very important 3 Somewhat important 4 Important 5 Very important SUBJECTS TEST SCORE RETEST DIFFERENCE 1 5 5 0 2 4 4 0 3 4 4 0 4 5 5 0 5 4 3 1 6 4 3 1 7 5 5 0 8 5 5 0 9 5 5 9 10 3 5 2 11 4 4 0 12 5 5 0 13 5 5 0 14 5 5 0 15 5 5 0 Spearman rank-order coefficient of correlation = r = T _ 6 D n(n-1) r - 0.9893 At the .01 level of significance, the critical value is 0.715. The null hypothesis is rejected and a positive correlation is demonstrated between the answers given on the test and the retest for question #6. 210 APPENDIX F DATA FROM TEST-RETEST FOR RELTARXLITY, QUESTION #12 Do you feel that the content (i.e., subject matter) of gerontology has important implications for the future of your discipline? 1 It has very important implications 2 It has important implications 3 Its implications are slightly important 4 The implications of gerontology have no importance for my discipline SUBJECTS TEST SCORE RETEST DIFFERENCE 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 0 3 2 1 0 4 1 1 0 5 2 2 0 6 2 2 0 7 1 1 0 8 1 1 0 9 1 1 0 10 3 2 1 11 2 2 0 12 1 4 3 13 1 1 0 14 1 1 0 15 1 1 0 Spearman rank-order coefficient of correlation = r = 1 - 6D n(n-1) 4 = 0.981 At the .01 level of significance, the critical value is 0.715. The null hypothesis is rejected and a positive correlation is demonstrated between the answers given on the test and the retest for question #12. 212 APPENDIX G ISSUES ON LICENSING 1. What governmental agency regulates the licensing of social work in California? 2. What license is granted by this agency? 3. Who are the current members representing social work in this agency? What are the professional backgrounds of these members? 4. How many social workers are licensed in the State of California? 5. What type of examination(s) is given to applicants for this license? 6. What are the qualifications applicants must meet to take the examination(s)? 7. Are any aging-related issues addressed on the examina tion (s) ? 8. Are there any future plans to expand or update aging related questions on the examination(s)? 9. How can gerontologists, who are interested in the pro fessional development of gerontology, learn from the licensing history of social work? 214 APPENDIX H 215 E t h e i . P w c f A o t e c s G e e o n t o l o c y Cexteh cîirrassrrTïAW t to* AXGEIEE, CALnOX:iL^ 9OOO7 ( 313) 746^060 November 15, 1975 To; Deans, D irectors, and Department Chairmen of Professional Programs Dear The Leonard Davis School o f the Andrus Gerontology Center has been funded a grant by the National Retired Teachers Association / American Association of Retired Persons to examine several disciplines and th e ir relationships to gerontology and professionalism. Students from the Davis School are involved in the data co llection and analysis under the guidance o f Margaret Hartford, Ira H irs ch fie ld , W illiam A lb ert, and myself. This project w ill be helpful in increasing our knowledge o f the gerontological offerings of the colleges and u n ive rs ities in C a lifo rn ia and the expectations of professional credential ing boards. The study w ill f a c ilit a t e the future planning of the involved d isciplines and the advancement o f services, research, and education o f problems of aging. A s part o f th is study, a group of graduate students and facu lty are conducting a survey of the content on aging in professional cu rric u la . Within the next few weeks, an attempt w ill be made by one of these groups to interview you eith er in person or by telephone. The research group has had the opportunity to review your current b u lle tin , and other m aterials to determine the nature of your program and evidence of content on aging. The interview w ill be fo r the purpose of f i ll i n g in necessary data. The researcher w ill want to make inquiry about faculty teaching gerontology content, the extent of content, and the number o f students p articip atin g in the classes with aging content. Enclosed is a copy of the questionnaire for your perusal. W e want you to know th at the school has authorized this study and that we hope that you can assist our students in producing the necessary inform ation. Thank you fo r your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jam es E B irren , Ph.D. ^Executive Director Andrus Gerontology Center MEH/jel Enel.. Margaret E. H artford, Ph.D. Director Leonard Davis School o f Gerontology 216