Close
About
FAQ
Home
Collections
Login
USC Login
Register
0
Selected
Invert selection
Deselect all
Deselect all
Click here to refresh results
Click here to refresh results
USC
/
Digital Library
/
University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses
/
Class Consciousness And Social Mobility In A Mexican-American Community
(USC Thesis Other)
Class Consciousness And Social Mobility In A Mexican-American Community
PDF
Download
Share
Open document
Flip pages
Contact Us
Contact Us
Copy asset link
Request this asset
Transcript (if available)
Content
This dissertation has been 64-2598 m icrofilm ed exactly as received PENALOSA, Fernando, 1925- CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS AND SOCIAL MOBILITY IN A MEXICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY. University of Southern California, P h .D ., 1963 Sociology, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS AND SOCIAL MOBILITY IN A MEXICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY by F ernando P e n a lo s a A D i s s e r t a t i o n P r e s e n t e d to th e FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In P a r t i a l F u l f i l l m e n t o f th e R e q u ire m e n ts f o r t h e D egree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ( S o c io lo g y ) June 1963 UNIVERSITY OF SO U T H E R N CALIFORNIA GRADUATE SCH O O L UNIVERSITY PARK LOS A N G ELES 7, C A LIFOR N IA This dissertation, written by Fernando P e n a lo s a under the direction of h%S....Dissertation C o m mittee, and a p p ro v ed by all its members, has been presented to and accepted by the Graduate School, in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of D O C T O R O F P H I L O S O P H Y ......................... D ean Date Jime... 19-6-3-............................... mSSERTA^'I0Ni COMMITTEE / ..... ' - • C hairm an ACKNOWLEDGMENTS F o r w h a te v e r m e r i t t h i s r e p o r t may have I am h e a v i l y i n d e b t e d and d e e p ly g r a t e f u l t o th e many f i n e p e o p le o f M exican d e s c e n t i n Pomona whom i t was my p r i v i l e g e to i n t e r v i e w . I am a l s o in d e b t e d and g r a t e f u l to P r o f e s s o r s Edward C. McDonagh, Thomas E. L a s s w e ll, and J o s e p h E. W eckler f o r a s s i s t a n c e i n p r e p a r a t i o n o f th e p r e s e n t r e p o r t , and f o r y e a r s o f en co u rag e m en t, i n s p i r a t i o n , p a t i e n c e , and u n f la g g in g m o ral s u p p o r t. TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................. . i i i LIST OP T A B L E S ..............................................................................................v i i LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................... . . . . . . x iv C h a p te r I . THE PROBLEM AND DEFINITION OP TERMS . . . . 1 S ta te m e n t o f th e Problem D e f i n i t i o n o f Terms Im p o rta n ce o f th e Study O r g a n iz a tio n o f th e Study I I . REVIEW OF THE LITE R A T U R E ........................................... 10 I n t r o d u c t i o n The M exican-A m erican P o p u la tio n E th n ic D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n and S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n P e r c e p tio n o f S t a t u s D i f f e r e n c e s S t r a t i f i c a t i o n in M exican-A m erican Communities C r i t e r i a o f S t r a t i f i c a t i o n T y p o lo g ie s I I I . THE METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN ...... .... 64 I n t r o d u c t i o n P la n n in g S ta g e I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f th e M exican- American P o p u la tio n Sam pling F i e l d P ro c e d u re s T e s ti n g o f H ypotheses iv V Chapter Page IV. POMONA'S MEXICAN COMMUNITY............................... . 86 S o c i a l H i s t o r y S o c i o c u l t u r a l O r ig in s P r e s e n t S o c i o c u l t u r a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s O c c u p a tio n and O th e r C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e sp o n d e n ts V o lu n ta r y A s s o c ia t io n s L e a d e r s h ip R e s i d e n t i a l A reas V. PERCEPTION OP STATUS DIPPERENCES ..................... 169 P e r c e p t i o n o f S o c i a l C l a s s e s P e r c e p t i o n o f Mexican C la s s System C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e s p o n d e n ts and Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e iv e d P e r c e p t i o n o f Anglo C la s s System C r i t e r i a o f S o c i a l S t a t u s V I. SELF-PERCEPTION BY MEXICAN-AMERICANS . . . 206 S e l f - P l a c e m e n t i n C la s s S t r u c t u r e S e l f - P e r c e p t i o n and O th e r P e r c e p t i o n s o f R e sp o n d e n ts V II. SOCIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY ..................... 235 I n t r o d u c t i o n M o b i l i t y and C la s s P e r c e p t i o n s o f R e sp o n d e n ts M o b i l i t y and C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e sp o n d e n ts V I I I . TOWARD A TYPOLOGY OP MEXICAN-AMERICANS . - 2 8 l The S t a t u s D im ension I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f S t a t u s L e v e ls S o c i a l C la s s and M o b i l it y S o c i a l C la s s and Economic C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e sp o n d e n ts vi Chapter S o c i a l C la s s and C u l t u r a l C h a r a c te r i s t i c s o f R esp ond ents S o c i a l C la s s and P e r c e p t io n s o f R esp o n d en ts The S o c i o c u l t u r a l Dimension IX. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ......................................... The Mexican Community S t a t u s P e r c e p tio n and S o c i a l M o b ility S t a t u s and S o c i o c u l t u r a l T y p o lo g ies APPENDIX A. INTERVIEW SCHEDULE (ENGLISH VERSION) APPENDIX B. INTERVIEW SCHEDULE (SPANISH VERSION) . APPENDIX C. CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONS . . . . Page 321 344 348 352 BIBLIOGRAPHY 355 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Comparison o f th e Age o f Pomona S p a n ish - Surname P e rso n s i n th e W r i t e r 's Sample w i t h D ata from th e U. S. Census o f i 960 . . 81 2. Comparison o f th e Income o f Pomona S p a n ish - Surname F a m ilie s In th e W r i t e r 's Sample w ith D ata from th e U. S. Census o f i 960 . . 83 3- Com parison o f th e S c h o o lin g o f Pomona S p a n ish - Surname P e rso n s i n th e W r i t e r 's Sample w ith D ata from th e U. S. Census o f i 9 6 0 ..................... 84 4. P o p u la tio n o f Pomona, 1900-1960 100 5* M a r i t a l S t a t u s o f R e sp o n d e n ts ...................................... 107 6. G e n e ra tio n and Age o f R e sp o n d en ts . . . . . . 109 7 . S c h o o lin g and Age o f R e s p o n d e n t s .......................................112 8. G e n e ra tio n and S c h o o lin g o f R esp o n d en ts . . . 114 9 . G e n e ra tio n and Language P r e f e r e n c e o f R e s p o n d e n t s .............................. 116 10. S c h o o lin g and Language P r e f e r e n c e o f R esp o n d en ts ....................................................................117 11. Age and Language P r e f e r e n c e o f R e sp o n d en ts . . 118 12. O ccu p atio n and G e n e ra tio n o f R esp on dents . . . 124 13. O ccup ation and Age o f R e s p o n d e n t s ................................. 125 vii v l i i Table Page 14. O ccu p atio n and Language P r e f e r e n c e o f R e s p o n d e n t s .............................................. 126 15- O ccu patio n and I n d u s t r y o f A ll Employed P e rso n s i n Sample H ouseholds .................................... 130 16. O ccu p a tio n and S c h o o lin g o f R esp o n d en ts . . . 134 17* O c cu p a tio n o f Head o f H ousehold and Income . . 136 18. G e n e ra tio n and Income o f R e sp o n d en ts ...................... 138 19- Age and Income o f R e s p o n d e n t s ............................................139 20. Language P r e f e r e n c e and Income o f R e sp o n d e n ts. 140 21. S c h o o lin g and Income o f R esp o n d e n ts . . . . . 142 22. A dult Mexican P o p u la tio n and Sample S ize I n R e s i d e n t i a l A reas .......................................... 153 23- L ength o f R e sid e n c e and A r e a .................................................154 24. Home Ownership and L ength o f R e sid e n c e . . . . 156 25- R e s i d e n t i a l Area and Home O w n e r s h i p ............................157 26. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and O ccu p a tio n o f Head o f H o u s e h o l d .............................................. 159 27. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and Income o f R e sp o n d en ts . . 160 28. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and Language P r e f e r e n c e o f R esp o n d en ts . . . . . . . ................................... 162 2 9 . R e s i d e n t i a l Area and M a r i t a l S t a t u s o f R e sp o n d en ts . ................................... 164 30. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and Age o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . . 165 31. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and G e n e ra tio n o f R e s p o n d e n t s ............................................................. 166 ix Table Page 32. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and S c h o o lin g o f R e sp o n d e n ts . 168 33- S c h o o lin g and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la ss D i v i s i o n s .................................................................. 173 34. C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D i v i s i o n s .........................................................................174 35* Age and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D iv is io n s . . . 175 3 6 . Language P r e f e r e n c e and C o n sc io u sn e ss of C la ss D i v i s i o n s .........................................................................176 37* M emberships and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D iv i s i o n s . . . ' .........................................................................177 38. Income and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la ss D iv i s i o n s . 178 39* G e n e r a tio n and C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D iv i s i o n s . . .. . . . . . . . .......................... 179 40. S c h o o lin g and Number o f C la s s e s P e rc e iv e d . . 188 41. Language P r e f e r e n c e and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d .................................... .. .. . . . . . 189 42. Age and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e i v e d ............................ 190 43. G e n e r a tio n and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d . . 192 44. O ccu p atio n and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d . . 194 4 5 . Number o f Mexican and Anglo C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d . 196 46. C r i t e r i a Used i n D i f f e r e n t i a t i n g S o c i a l C l a s s e s ............................................................................................. 201 47. S o c i a l D i f f e r e n c e s P e r c e iv e d and C r i t e r i a Used f o r S o c ia l C l a s s e s .............................................. 203 X Table Page 48. O ccu p atio n and C r i t e r i a Used f o r S o c ia l C l a s s e s ............................................................................................. 205 49- C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e i v e d ......................... 208 50. Income and C la s s S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s ...................... 211 51. Age and C la ss S e l f - C o n s c i c ’’s n e s s ......................................212 52. Language P r e f e r e n c e and C lass S e l f - C o n sc io u sn e ss ..............................................................................213 53- V eteran s* S t a t u s and C la s s S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s . 214 54. S c h o o lin g and C la s s S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . . 215 55- C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D iv is io n s and C la s s S e l f - C o n s c io u s n e s s .............................................................. 216 56. Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d and C la ss S e l f - C o n sc io u sn e ss .............................................................................. 217 57* O ccu p a tio n and C la s s S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . 219 5 8 . G e n e ra tio n and C la s s S e l f - C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . 220 59. Number o f Fam ily Members w ith Whom S p a n ish Spoken and C la s s S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . . 221 60. M o b ility and C la ss S e lf - C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . . 222 61. R e s i d e n t i a l Area and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t . . 224 6 2 . O ccu p atio n and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t ..................... 226 6 3 . G e n e ra tio n and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t . . . . . 228 64. S c h o o lin g and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t . . . . . . 231 6 5 . Language P r e f e r e n c e and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t . 233 x l Table Page 6 6 . F a t h e r s ' O c c u p a tio n and R e s p o n d e n ts ' S c h o o lin g 237 67* F a t h e r s ' O c c u p a tio n , R e s p o n d e n ts ' S c h o o lin g and R e s p o n d e n ts ' O c c u p a tio n ........................................ 238 6 8 . S c h o o lin g and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n ts . . . . 240 69* F a t h e r s ' O c c u p a tio n and R e s p o n d e n ts ' O c c u p a tio n 241 70. F a t h e r s ' O c c u p a tio n and R e s p o n d e n ts ' M o b i l i t y . 244 71. O c c u p a tio n and M o b i l i t y o f A ll R e s p o n d e n ts . . 246 72. O c c u p a tio n and M o b i l i t y o f Employed R e s p o n d e n t s ................................................................... 247 73- O c c u p a tio n o f Heads o f H o u seh o ld and M o b i l i t y o f H o u s e w i v e s .................................................................................248 74. M o b i l i t y and E t h n i c S e l f - I d e n t i f i c a t i o n . . . 250 75- M o b i l i t y and C l a s s S e l f - P l a c e m e n t ............................. 251 7 6 . M o b i l i t y and Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e i v e d . . . 254 77* R e s i d e n t i a l Area an d P r e v io u s R e s i d e n t i a l A rea 257 7 8 . R e s i d e n t i a l and O c c u p a t io n a l M o b i l i t y . . . . 259 79- R e s i d e n t i a l Area and M o b i l it y , oj^ R e sp o n d e n ts . 260 80. R e s i d e n t i a l S t a b i l i t y , and O c c u p a tio n a l M o b i l i t y . . . . . / .................................................262 V " x v \ 81. Home O w nership and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n ts . . 264 82._ Number o f Y e ars i n P r e s e n t Employment and M o b i l i t y .................................................................................................265 83* Income and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n ts . . . . . . 267 84. G e n e r a t i o n and M o b i l i t y o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . . . 270 xii Table Page 85* Age, Sex and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n t s ..................272 86. R e l i g i o u s P r e f e r e n c e and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n t s ..........................................................................274 87- Language P r e f e r e n c e and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n t s ................................................................... ..... . 276 88. Language Spoken i n Fam ily an d M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n t s .......................................................................... 277 89* Use o f S p a n ish -L a n g u a g e Media o f Communication and M o b i l i t y o f R e s p o n d e n t s .................................279 90. Number o f S p a n is h Language Media o f Communica t i o n Used and M o b i l it y o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . . 280 91. C o e f f i c i e n t s o f C o n tin g e n cy f o r M ajor V a r ia b l e s o f th e S t u d y .............................................. 284 92. M o b i l i t y and S o c i a l C lass o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . . 296 93* O c cu p a tio n and S o c i a l C la s s o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . 299 94. T o t a l F am ily Income and S o c i a l C la s s o f R e sp o n d e n ts ............................................................................... 301 95* R e s i d e n t i a l Area and S o c ia l C la s s o f R e s p o n d e n t s ...........................................................................302 9 6 . S c h o o lin g and S o c i a l C la ss o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . 304 97* G e n e r a tio n and S o c i a l C la s s o f R e sp o n d e n ts . . 306 98. Language P r e f e r e n c e and S o c i a l C la s s o f R e s p o n d e n t s ............................... 308 99- Age and S o c i a l C la s s o f R e s p o n d e n t s ..................309 100. S o c i a l C la s s and C la s s C o n s c io u s n e s s . . . . . 311 101. S o c i a l C la s s and Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e iv e d . 313 xiii T ab le Page 102. S o c i a l C la s s and C la s s S e lf - P la c e m e n t . . . . 31^- 103. C l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f R e sp o n d e n ts i n S t a tu s and S o c i o c u l t u r a l D im ensions o f T y p o l o g y ........................................................................................ 320 LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS F ig u r e Page 1. R e s i d e n t i a l A reas o f Pomona ......................................... 6 j xiv CHAPTER I PROBLEM AND DEFINITION OF TERMS S ta te m e n t o f th e Problem The p r e s e n t s tu d y i s an a tte m p t t o i n v e s t i g a t e some o f th e d im e n sio n s o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n among th e p e r so n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t r e s i d i n g i n th e c i t y o f Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a , w ith p a r t i c u l a r r e f e r e n c e t o c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s and s o c i a l m o b i l i t y . The s tu d y em p h asizes p e r c e p t i o n by p e rs o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t ( r a t h e r th a n by A nglos, a s i n so much o f th e l i t e r a t u r e ) o f th e M exican-A m erican and A nglo-A m erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e s , and o f t h e i r own c l a s s p o s i t i o n . The r e s e a r c h e r was i n t e r e s t e d i n th e p o s s i b l e r e l a t i o n s o f such p e r c e p t i o n s t o c e r t a i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f r e s p o n d e n ts such as l o c a t i o n o f r e s i d e n c e , o c c u p a tio n , s c h o o lin g , u se o f th e S p a n ish la n g u a g e , and incom e. The p o s s i b l e r e l a t i o n s o f s o c i a l m o b i l i t y to t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and p e r c e p t i o n s i s a n o th e r im p o r ta n t fo c u s o f th e r e s e a r c h . The l a s t p hase o f th e problem h as b een th e a tte m p te d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f an in d e x o f s o c i a l s t a t u s f o r M exican-A m ericans and a s o c i o c u l t u r a l ty p o lo g y f o r t h i s g r o u p . The b a s i c a ssu m p tio n o f t h i s s tu d y i s t h a t members o f th e M e x io a n -d e sc e n t p o p u l a t i o n of Pomona have been u n d e rg o in g th e c l o s e l y r e l a t e d p r o c e s s e s o f u r b a n i z a t i o n , a c c u l t u r a t i o n , and s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , and t h a t by s tu d y in g th e s e p r o c e s s e s i n a h i s t o r i c a l c o n te x t and t h e i r a s s o c i a t i o n w ith g e n e r a l l y r e c o g n iz e d r e l e v a n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h i s p o p u l a t i o n , an u n d e r s ta n d in g c o u ld be g a in e d o f th e ongoing dynam ics o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n t h i s e t h n i c community. The w r i t e r s i n g l e d o u t a number o f v a r i a b l e s and h y p o th e s iz e d t h a t th e y w ould eac h be a s s o c i a t e d w ith a l l o f th e others,* f u r t h e r , t h a t eac h w ould be a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y . The h y p o th e s iz e d r e l a t i o n s h i p s a r e a s f o l l o w s : 1. These v a r i a b l e s were h y p o th e s iz e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h eac h o t h e r : h ig h o c c u p a tio n a l s t a t u s , o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a b i l i t y , h ig h incom e, b e t t e r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , home o w n e rsh ip , l o n g e r r e s i d e n c e , more s c h o o lin g , l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n , v e t e r a n 's s t a t u s , P r o t e s t a n t 3 r e l i g i o n , E n g lis h - la n g u a g e p r e f e r e n c e , and l a r g e number o f m em berships i n v o l u n t a r y o r g a n i z a t i o n s . (The o p p o s i t e s o f t h e s e were a l s o h y p o t h e s iz e d t o be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h eac h o t h e r . ) 2. T hese v a r i a b l e s were h y p o th e s iz e d t o be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h e ac h o t h e r , b u t n e g a t i v e l y w ith th o s e l i s t e d u n d e r c a te g o r y 1: g r e a t e r number o f p e rs o n s i n f a m ily w ith whom S p a n ish i s spoken, g r e a t e r number o f S p a n is h - la n g u a g e com m unication m edia u se d , and g r e a t e r age. 3- The a b i l i t y o f r e s p o n d e n ts to p e r c e i v e c l a s s d i v i s i o n s in t h e Mexican community was h y p o th e s iz e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1 and n e g a t i v e l y w ith t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a te g o r y 2. 4. The number o f c l a s s d i v i s i o n s p e r c e i v e d by r e s p o n d e n t s was h y p o t h e s iz e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h th e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1 and n e g a t i v e l y w ith th e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 2. The a b i l i t y t o p l a c e o n e s e l f i n th e c l a s s d i v i s i o n system was h y p o th e s iz e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w ith t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1 and n e g a t i v e l y w ith t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a te g o r y 2. 6. H igh s e l f - p l a c e m e n t in th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e was h y p o t h e s iz e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1 and n e g a t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 2. 7• Low s e l f - p l a c e m e n t i n t h e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e was h y p o t h e s i z e d t o be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w ith t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 2 and n e g a t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1. 8. High s o c i a l c l a s s (a s i n d i c a t e d by an in d e x t o be c o n s t r u c t e d from t h e d a t a g a t h e r e d i n t h e c o u rs e o f t h e s tu d y ) was h y p o t h e s i z e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h th e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1 and n e g a t i v e l y w ith t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 2. 9- Low s o c i a l c l a s s was h y p o t h e s i z e d to be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 2 and n e g a t i v e l y w i t h t h e v a r i a b l e s o f c a t e g o r y 1. 10 . I t was f i n a l l y h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t h i g h s o c i a l c l a s s ( c a t e g o r y 8) w ould be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h th e t y p e s o f p e r c e p t i o n i n d i c a t e d a s c a t e g o r i e s 3, 4., 5 , and 6 , and t h a t e a c h o f t h e s e w ould be a s s o c i a t e d p o s i t i v e l y w i t h e a c h o f th e o t h e r s . 11. Low s o c i a l c l a s s was h y p o t h e s i z e d t o b e .... a s s o c i a t e d n e g a t i v e l y w i t h c a t e g o r i e s 3> 4, 5 j and 6. 5 D e f i n i t i o n o f Terms The p r i n c i p a l te rm s u s e d i n t h e s tu d y a r e d e f i n e d h e r e . In m ost c a s e s o p e r a t i o n a l d e f i n i t i o n s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n r e l e v a n t s e c t i o n s o f th e body o f th e d i s s e r t a t i o n . M exican-A m erican A M exican-A m erican i s a p e r s o n o f Mexican d e s c e n t p e r m a n e n tly r e s i d e n t i n t h e U n ite d S t a t e s . "M exican- A m erican p o p u l a t i o n " . and " M e x ic a n -d e s c e n t p o p u l a t i o n " a r e c o n c e iv e d o f a s synonymous te r m s . Any i n d i v i d u a l who i s d e s c e n d e d from S p a n is h - s p e a k in g p e r s o n s p e r m a n e n tly r e s i d e n t i n Mexico and who r e s i d e s i n t h e c i t y of" Pomona i s a member o f Pom ona's M exican-A m erican community. Community A comm unity i s a r e l a t i v e l y s e l f - c o n t a i n e d g ro u p s h a r i n g a common t e r r i t o r y w i t h i n w h ich a r e l o c a t e d th e p r i n c i p a l f a c i l i t i e s f o r t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f i t s r e s i d e n t s ' o r d i n a r y n e e d s . In t h i s s tu d y "com m unity" g e n e r a l l y r e f e r s t o th e p o p u l a t i o n r e s i d i n g w i t h i n t h e Pomona c i t y l i m i t s . "M exican-A m erican community" r e f e r s t o a l l M exican-A m eri c an p e r s o n s r e s i d e n t i n t h e comm unity o f Pomona. C o lo n la The S p a n is h - la n g u a g e term c o l o n l a I s u s e d to r e f e r t o th e M exican-A m erican s e t t l e m e n t p r o p e r , i . e . , t h e a r e a o f h i g h e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f th e M e x ic a n -d e s c e n t p o p u l a t i o n w i t h i n w hich a r e l o c a t e d th e p r i n c i p a l M exican b u s i n e s s c o n c e rn s and i n s t i t u t i o n s . S o c i a l c l a s s A s o c i a l c l a s s i s c o n s t i t u t e d by i n d i v i d u a l s who a r e p e r c e i v e d by community members t o occu py s i m i l a r s t a t u s p o s i t i o n s , h e n ce a s s h a r i n g a s i m i l a r s t y l e o f l i f e . C la s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s C la s s c o n s c io u s n e s s i s t h e a b i l i t y t o make j u d g m ents a s t o th e s o c i a l c l a s s m em bership o f o n e s e l f and o f o t h e r s . C la s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s h a s b een s t u d i e d i n te rm s o f r e s p o n d e n t s ' v e r b a l e x p l a n a t i o n s o f t h e i r p e r c e p t i o n s o f t h e i r own and o t h e r s ' s t a t u s w i t h i n th e M exican-A m erican comm unity. S o c i a l m o b i l i t y By s o c i a l m o b i l i t y i s m eant a change i n a p e r s o n 's s t a t u s o r i n h i s g ro u p m em bership. In t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n s o c i a l m o b i l i t y i s t r e a t e d p r i m a r i l y i n te rm s o f o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y , l e s s i m p o r t a n t l y i n te rm s o f change o f r e s i d e n c e o r e t h n i c a f f i l i a t i o n . O c c u p a tio n a l m o b i l i t y T h is s t u d y u s e s " o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y " i n th e r e s t r i c t e d s e n s e o f change i n ra n k e d o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s from t h e p a r e n t a l to t h e s u c c e e d in g g e n e r a t i o n . Im p o rta n c e o f th e S tud y T here a r e s e v e r a l e m p i r i c a l s t u d i e s c o n t a i n i n g m a t e r i a l on s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n M exican-A m erican c o m m u n ities and s t r a t i f i c a t i o n o f t h e M exican-A m erican sub-com m unity h a s som etim es b e en s t u d i e d a s p a r t o f th e l a r g e r com m unity. (T hese a r e d i s c u s s e d i n C h a p te r I I . ) However, t h e r e s e a r c h e r c o u ld f i n d no i n t e n s i v e s t r a t i f i c a t i o n s tu d y b a s e d on a c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l sam ple o f an e n t i r e M exican-A m erican community. Inasm uch a s a b o u t t h r e e - f o u r t h s o f a l l M exicans i n t h e U n ite d S t a t e s l i v e i n M exican s e t t l e m e n t s o r c o l o n i a s ^ t h e s e a r e o f s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t and im p o r ta n c e . 1Jo hn H. Burma, S p a n is h - S p e a k in g G roups i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s (Durham: Duke U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1954 )> p . 88. U n lik e th e w r i t e r ' s s t u d y , how ever, m ost p r e v io u s s t u d i e s have fo c u se d upon t h e s e s e t t l e m e n t s and h av e l a r g e l y I g n o re d th o s e M exicans who l i v e o u t s i d e t h e c o lo n i a s i n p re d o m in a n tly Anglo n e ig h b o r h o o d s . The w r i t e r to o k a c r o s s - s e c t i o n o f th e e n t i r e M exican-A m erican p o p u la tio n o f t h e - c i t y o f Pomona. The r e s e a r c h h e re r e p o r t e d , how ever, d e a l s o n ly w i t h s t r a t i f i c a t i o n w i t h in t h e Mexican com m u n ity ; i t i s n o t c o n c e rn e d w i t h th e p o s i t i o n o f th e Mexican p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e t o t a l community. The r e s e a r c h i s c o n c e iv e d o f p r i m a r i l y a s a c o n t r i b u t i o n t o th e s o c i o l o g i c a l stud y o f th e M exican- d e s c e n t p o p u l a t i o n o f t h e U n ited S t a t e s , and s e c o n d a r i l y as a c o n t r i b u t i o n to t h e stu dy o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n . I t s p o t e n t i a l im p o rta n c e may be a t t r i b u t e d to i t s focu s on th e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f th e s e two f i e l d s o f I n t e r e s t , and to th e m e th o d o lo g ic a l a p p ro a c h u t i l i z e d . O r g a n iz a tio n o f t h e Study The m ethod o f t h e stu d y has been t o (1) rev ie w t h e l i t e r a t u r e r e l a t e d to s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n and th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n ; ( 2 ) s t a t e t h e h y p o th e s e s r e l e v a n t to f a c t o r s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h th e s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n o f a M exican-Am erican community; (3 ) stu d y th e s o c i a l h i s t o r y and p re s e n t s o c i a l c o n d itio n s o f th e community chosen f o r stu d y ; (4) d e v i s e , p r e t e s t and admin i s t e r th e r e s e a r c h in s tru m e n t to a random a re a sam ple o f th e s e l e c t e d p o p u l a t i o n f o r th e p u rp o s e o f t e s t i n g th e r e l e v a n t h y p o th e s e s ; (5) r e p o r t an d an aly ze th e f i n d i n g s ; and (6) draw c o n c lu s io n s and c o n s t r u c t a ty p o lo g y based on th e c o n c l u s i o n s . CHAPTER II REVIEW OP THE LITERATURE I n t r o d u c t i o n The p u b l is h e d l i t e r a t u r e p e r t i n e n t to th e r e s e a r c h e r 's t o p ic was review ed b e f o r e th e s tu d y was d e s ig n e d o r th e h y p o th e s e s fo r m u la te d . The m ost im p or t a n t works were o f c o u rs e th o se d e a l in g w ith s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n among th e M exican-Am erican p o p u la tio n , e s p e c i a l l y th o s e by B a r k e r , ! C l a r k , 2 G r i f f i t h , 3 Simmons,^ ^George C. B a rk e r, " S o c ia l F u n c tio n s o f Language i n a Mexican American Community," Acta Am ericana, V ( J u ly , 1947), 185- 202. 2M a rg are t C la rk , H e a lth i n th e Mexican American C u ltu r e (B e rk e le y : U n i v e r s i ty o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1959)* •^Beatrice G r i f f i t h , American Me (B oston: Houghton M i f f l i n C o., 1948). ^O zzie Simmons, "Am ericans and Mexican Americans i n South Texas" (u n p u b lis h e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , H arvard U n i v e r s i ty , 1952). 10 11 T a y l o r , 5 T u c k , 6 an d Watson and S am o ra.^ U s e fu l a l s o were q Q t h e s t u d i e s o f L a s s w e ll^ and Rogers-7 on co m m un ities w i t h s u b s t a n t i a l M exican-A m erican m i n o r i t i e s . B e s id e s t h i s s m a ll number o f s t u d i e s a n a lo g o u s to t h e r e s e a r c h e r ' s own, th e g e n e r a l l i t e r a t u r e on th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n and much o f th e r e l e v a n t work i n th e f i e l d o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n was a l s o r e v ie w e d . The M exican-A m erican P o p u l a ti o n T h is e t h n i c p o p u l a t i o n can be c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s "an a g g r e g a t i o n o f k i n s h i p u n i t s , t h e members o f w hich e i t h e r ^ P a u l S c h u s t e r T a y l o r , An A m erican-M exican F r o n t i e r (C hapel H i l l : U n i v e r s i t y o f N o rth C a r o li n a P r e s s , 1 9 3 4 ). % lu th D. Tuck, Not W ith t h e F i s t (New York: H a r c o u r t , B race and C o ., 1 9 4 6 ). ^Jam es B. Watson and J u l i a n Sam ora, " S u b o r d in a te L e a d e r s h ip i n B i c u l t u r a l Com m unity," Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l Review , XIX (A u g u st, 1 9 5 4 ), 4 1 3 -2 1 . ^Thomas E. L a s s w e ll, " S t a t u s S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n a S e l e c t e d Community" ( u n p u b lis h e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , 1953)* ^ R o b e rt B. R o g e rs, " P e r c e p t i o n o f t h e Power S t r u c t u r e by S o c i a l C la s s i n a C a l i f o r n i a Community" ( u n p u b lis h e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , 1 9 6 2 ). 12 t r a c e t h e i r o r i g i n i n term s o f d e s c e n t from a common a n c e s t o r o r i n term s o f d e s c e n t from a n c e s t o r s who a l l b e lo n g e d to th e same c a t e g o r i z e d e t h n i c g r o u p . 1 '10 F u r t h e r m ore, a c c o rd in g t o W illia m s , t h e y s h a r e c e r t a i n p h y s i c a l o r c u l t u r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and th u s " a re r e g a r d e d by o t h e r members o f some l a r g e r c o l l e c t i v i t y w i t h in whose power system th e y l i v e , as d i f f e r e n t and as an o b j e c t o f o u t- g r o u p s e n t i m e n t s . " 11 T h is i s a p o p u l a t i o n , however, e a s i e r t o d e f i n e th a n to i d e n t i f y . B e fo re 1930 th e U n ite d S t a t e s B ureau o f th e Census i n c l u d e d M exicans w i th in th e w h ite p o p u l a t i o n , b u t i n t h a t y e a r th e y were t r e a t e d a s a s e p a r a t e gro u p u n l e s s d e f i n i t e l y w h ite , In d ia n o r Negro. "Not o n ly were p e rs o n s o f Mexican b i r t h and p a r e n t a g e i d e n t i f i e d . . . b u t a l s o an a tte m p t was made to i d e n t i f y a s 'M ex ica n ' p e r s o n s o f S p a n ish c o l o n i a l d e s c e n t and th e ‘L C :,T a l c o t t P a r s o n s , The S o c i a l System (G lencoe: F re e P r e s s , 1951)* P* 172. 11Robin M. W illia m s , J r . , " R a c ia l and C u l t u r a l R e l a t i o n s , " i n J o s e p h B. G i t t l e r , e d . , Review o f ^ S o c io l o g y : A n a ly s is o f a Decade (New York: John W iley & Sons, 1957)* p . 425. 13 "i p s m a ll number o f g r a n d c h i l d r e n o f M exican im m ig r a n ts ." I n 1940 t h e B u reau o f t h e Census u s e d m o th e r tongue i n i d e n t i f y i n g th e M exican p o p u l a t i o n ; f o r t h e 1950 and i 960 c e n s u s e s t h e B u reau h a s u s e d S p a n ish su rn am es. T h is l a t t e r m ethod w ould a p p e a r t o be so f a r th e b e s t d e v i s e d , a t l e a s t f o r th e s o u th w e s te rn s t a t e s : In te rm s o f t h e a v a i l a b l e e v id e n c e t h e r e a p p e a rs to be no r e a s o n f o r assu m ing t h a t th e u s e o f s u r names to i d e n t i f y t h e S p a n ish -A m e ric a n p o p u l a t i o n i s any l e s s a d e q u a te t h a n p r o c e d u r e s p r e v i o u s l y u s e d ; and, i n some r e s p e c t s , i t s u s e may le a d t o a g e n u in e im provem ent i n th e q u a l i t y o f th e s t a t i s t i c s .1 3 B ecause t h e names o f some p e r s o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t a r e n o t d i s t i n c t i v e and b e c a u se some p e o p le have chang ed t h e i r names ( e s p e c i a l l y th r o u g h m a r ria g e o r a d o p ti o n ) Manuel e s t i m a t e s t h a t f i g u r e s on th e M exican p o p u l a t i o n b a s e d on S p a n is h surname c o u n ts a r e a b o u t 2 .5 p e r c e n t l o w .- ^ T a l b e r t b e l i e v e s t h a t even "th oug h t h e ■^U. S. B ureau o f th e C ensus, P e rso n s o f S p a n is h Surnam e, U n ite d S t a t e s Census o f P o p u l a t i o n : 1950* V ol. IV, S p e c i a l R e p o r ts , P a r t 3 , Chap. C (W ashington, D. C . : U. S. Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1 9 3 3 ) , p . 5* 13 I b i d . , p . 6. l 4 H e r s c h e l T. M anuel, E d u c a tio n o f Mexican an d S p a n is h -S p e a k in g C h ild r e n i n Texas ( A u s t i n : F u n d f o r R e s e a r c h i n th e S o c i a l S c i e n c e s , U n i v e r s i t y o f T ex a s, 1 9 3 0 ), p . 410. 14 'P e rs o n o f S p a n ish Surname A pproach' may g iv e an u n d e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e t o t a l p e r s o n s o f S p a n is h o r M exican b a c k g ro u n d , i t d o e s a p p e a r t o be th e b e s t a v a i l a b l e s o u rc e o f i n f o r m a t i o n . "15 A lthough h i s r e s e a r c h l e d him to e s t i mate t h a t th e surnam e c r i t e r i o n l e a d s t o an u n d e r s t a t e m e n t o f th e S p a n is h a n d M exican p o p u l a t i o n o f New Mexico by about 1 0 p e r c e n t , W innie a g r e e s t h a t " t h e surname c r i t e r i o n seem s to o f f e r as good a g e n e r a l - p u r p o s e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a s a n y from t h e t e c h n i c a l s t a n d p o i n t ." 1 ^ I n the 1950 Census 8 6 .1 p e r c e n t o f a l l p e r s o n s o f f o r e i g n b i r t h o r p a r e n t a g e h a v in g a S p a n is h surname a n d /o r Mexican o r i g i n h a d b o th o f t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ; 6 .2 p e r cent h a d S p a n ish surnam es b u t w ere n o t o f Mexican o r i g i n ; 7-6 p e r c e n t were o f Mexican o r i g i n b u t d i d n o t hav e Span i s h s u rn a m e s . 1^ E t h n i c D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n and S o c ia l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n P a rso n s h a s o b s e rv e d t h a t " c l a s s d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n 15ptobert H. T a l b e r t , Spanish-N am e P eople i n th e S o u th w est and West ( F o r t W orth: Texas C h r i s t i a n U n i v e r s i t y , 1955), P . 11. l^ W illia m W. W innie, J r . , "The S p a n is h Surname C r i t e r i o n f o r I d e n t i f y i n g H isp a n o s i n th e S o u th w e s te rn U n ite d S t a t e s , S o c i a l F o r c e s , XXXVIII (May, i 9 6 0 ), 365- 17 U. S. B u re a u o f t h e C ensus, o p . c i t . , p. 7* 15 w i t h i n e t h n i c g ro u p s i s t h e r u l e r a t h e r th a n t h e e x c e p t i o n . W illia m s s i m i l a r l y o b s e r v e s t h a t t h e n o t i o n t h a t r a c i a l o r c u l t u r a l c a t e g o r i e s a r e I n t e r n a l l y homogeneous I s , o f c o u r s e , r e p e a t e d l y d is p r o v e d by s e r i o u s r e s e a r c h . W ith in e v e r y m i n o r i t y a r e l i n e s o f d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n b a s e d upon su c h f a c t o r s a s s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n . . . r e l i g i o u s p a r t i c i p a t i o n , p l a c e o f o r i g i n and l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e . . . I d e o l o g i c a l c o n v i c t i o n s , and m i l i t a r y o r a c c o m o d a tiv e a t t i t u d e s to w a rd th e m a j o r i t y g r o u p i n g . 19 The M exican -A m erican g ro u p c o n s t i t u t e s no e x c e p ti o n to t h e s e s t a t e m e n t s a l t h o u g h th e c h a r a c t e r o f t h i s i n t e r n a l d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n I s , o f c o u r s e , a m a t t e r to be i n v e s t i g a t e d by e m p i r i c a l r e s e a r c h . D i f f e r e n t i n v e s t i g a t o r s have " d i s c o v e r e d ” v a ry in g num bers o f s o c i a l s t r a t a In d i f f e r e n t e t h n i c g r o u p s . As Simpson and Y In g e r have n o t e d , "The num ber o f c l a s s e s u t i l i z e d i n i n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f r a c i a l and e t h n i c com m u n ities h a s v a r i e d from z e ro t o f i v e , d ep en d in g upon su c h m a t t e r s as th e a u t h o r ' s c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n , t h e c r i t e r i a u se d t o d e f i n e o r i d e n t i f y s o c i a l c l a s s e s , who d o es t h e c l a s s i f y i n g and th e ■ ^ P a rso n s, op. c i t . , p . 173* ^ W i l l i a m s , l o c . c i t . , p . 447 16 n a t u r e o f t h e com m u n ities t h e m s e l v e s . " 2^ In t h e p r e s e n t s tu d y , t h e w r i t e r ' s c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n i s b a s e d p r i m a r i l y on th e p e r c e p t i o n s o f a sam ple o f th e e t h n i c g ro u p i n q u e s t i o n (s e e C h a p te r V). The w r i t e r h a s been i n f l u e n c e d by P a r s o n s ' s t a te m e n t t h a t : The v a lu e system o f an e t h n i c g ro u p may v a ry from t h a t p aram ou nt i n t h e dom inant s o c i e t y . . . . The a c t i o n s o f an e t h n i c g ro u p s h o u ld be I n t e r p r e t e d i n te rm s o f i t s d i s t i n c t i v e c u l t u r e , I n c l u d i n g i t s own I n t e r n a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n and t h e ways i n w hich i t c a n , a c c o rd in g t o i t s v a l u e s , a p p r o p r i a t e l y a r t i c u l a t e w i t h th e m ain c l a s s s y s t e m . 21 Broom and Shevky, who p e r c e i v e th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n a s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by r e l a t i v e h o m o g en e ity w i t h r e f e r e n c e to s t a t u s , sa y t h a t t h e problem o f I n t e r n a l d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n i s d i f f i c u l t b e c a u se o f th e v e ry n a rro w s t a t u s d i s t r i b u t i o n p r e v a i l i n g i n t h a t p o p u l a t i o n . 22 S a u n d e rs 20 George Simpson and J . M ilto n Y in g e r, "The S o c io lo g y o f Race and E th n ic R e l a t i o n s , " i n R o b e rt K. M erton , L eo n ard Broom, and L eon ard S. C o t t r e l l , J r . , e d s . , S o c io lo g y Today: Problem s and P r o s p e c t s (New Y ork: B a s ic Books, 1959)* P* 395* 21T a l c o t t P a r s o n s , "A R e v is e d A n a l y t i c a l A pproach t o th e T heory o f S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n , " I n R e in h a rd B en dix and Seymour M a rtin L i p s e t , e d s . , C l a s s , S t a t u s and Power; a R e a d e r i n S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n (G len c o e, 111. : F re e P r e s s , 1953)> PP* 118-119* 22L eo n ard Broom and E s h r e f Shevky, "M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s , " S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a rc h , XXXVI ( J a n u a r y - F e b r u a r y , 1 9 5 2 ), 155* 17 s u g g e s ts t h a t M exican-Am erican c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s to some d eg ree b o th d e te rm in e and r e f l e c t th e e x t e n t o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n . . . . There a re d i f f e r e n c e s o f a t t i t u d e and b e h a v io r . . . t h a t c o r r e l a t e ro u g h ly w ith s u b j e c t i v e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s i n d i v i d u a l s make o f t h e i r own s t a t u s and th e s t a t u s o f o t h e r s . R e c o g n itio n o f th e s e d i f f e r e n ce s i s one b a s i s f o r th e s u b j e c t i v e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n w hich, i n t u r n , by d is c o u r a g in g a s s o c i a t i o n betw een p e rs o n s o f u n l i k e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , f o s t e r s f u r t h e r d i f f e r e n c e s . 23 The problem o f s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n and p e r c e p t i o n o f th e M exican-A m erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e i s tw o fo ld : p e r c e p t i o n o f s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s w i t h in th e Mexican group i t s e l f , and p e r c e p t i o n o f th e Mexican g r o u p 's p o s i t i o n i n th e community-wide s t a t u s s t r u c t u r e . M exican-Am erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e i n th e S o u th w est, as r e p o r t e d in t h e l i t e r a t u r e , i s h e a v i ly b a se d on p e r c e p t i o n s and e v a l u a t i o n s o f Anglo in f o r m a n ts . In th e view o f th e l a t t e r , th e s t a t u s o f M exicans i s u n i v e r s a l l y c o n s id e r e d to be r e l a t i v e l y low. McDonagh h as s t u d i e d t h e c o m p arativ e p o s i t i o n which th e Mexican e th n i c group o c c u p ie s i n th e American s t a t u s system , a s s e r t i n g t h a t ( l ) s o c i a l s t a t u s i s p ro b a b ly i n th e low er q u a r t i l e o f a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e l i s t o f e th n i c g ro u p s, ( 2 ) o f f i c i a l l e g a l s t a t u s seems to be e q u a l to th e m a j o r i t y S a u n d ers, C u l t u r a l D if f e r e n c e and M edical Care (New York: R u s s e l l Sage F o u n d a tio n , 1 9 5 ^ P* 80. 18 group . . . ( 3 ) e d u c a t i o n a l s t a t u s i s v e ry m odest i n term s o f fo rm a l s c h o o lin g c o m p lete d and (4) economic s t a t u s i s p r o b a b ly i n th e lo w e r q u a r t i l e o f e t h n i c g ro u p s i n te rm s o f p ay r a t e s and p e r c e n ta g e o f M exicans i n s k i l l e d jo b s and th e p r o f e s s i o n s . 24 S o c ia l d i s t a n c e s t u d i e s c a r r i e d o u t by B ogardus i n d i c a t e t h a t o u t o f 30 d i f f e r e n t e t h n i c gro u p s M exicans i n 1926 had a r a n k o f 21. In 1946 M exicans had a r a n k o f 24 and M exican-A m ericans 22; i n 1956, 28 and 22 r e s p e c t i v e l y . I f th e s c a l e i s v a l i d , i t i n d i c a t e s c o n s i s t e n t l y low e t h n i c s t a t u s f o r M exicans and M e x ica n -A m erica n s.25 The c a s t e - l i k e n a t u r e o f r e l a t i o n s betw een Anglo Am ericans and Mexican Am ericans h a s b e en n o te d by s e v e r a l s t u d e n t s o f Mexican Am ericans i n s o u th e r n C a l i f o r n i a and e ls e w h e re . In th e l a t e 1 9 2 0 f s P aul S. T a y lo r s t u d i e d M exican-Anglo r e l a t i o n s i n f o u r s o u th w e s te rn Texas com m u n i t i e s , i n a l l o f w hich th e M exicans and M exican- Am ericans were r e s l d e n t i a l l y s e g r e g a t e d , l i m i t e d a lm o st e x c l u s i v e l y to a g r i c u l t u r a l work, d i s c r i m i n a t e d a g a i n s t in Pii Edward C. McDonagh, " S t a tu s L e v e ls o f M e x ica n s," S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a rc h . XXXV (November-December, 19 50), 459. ^ E m o ry S. B o gardus, S o c ia l D is ta n c e (Los A ng eles, 195 9), p . 33. 19 many o t h e r ways, and v i r t u a l l y b a r r e d from i n t e r m a r r i a g e . 2^ G o ld s c h m id t's p re -w a r Wasco s tu d y showed t h a t "any s o c i a l advancem ent o f . . . a Mexican was w ith in h i s own gro u p ; he d id n o t e n t e r the s o c i a l s p h e re o f the w h ite com m u n ity ." The g r o u p 's i n t e r n a l u n i t y l e d them to h a v in g a community o f t h e i r own.2^ Tuck r e p o r t e d t h a t a lth o u g h b e fo r e World War I I i n San B e rn a rd in o t h e r e were no l e g a l r e s t r i c t i o n s a g a i n s t M exicans, t h e i r employment, e d u c a t i o n a l , s o c i a l , and h o u sin g o p p o r t u n i t i e s w ere l i m i t e d and l a r g e l y s e g r e g a t e d . The M exicans in t h i s c i t y w ere s a id by Tuck t o c o n s t i t u t e a c a s te o r s e m i - c a s t e , such g ro u p s b e in g "p erm an en t lo w e r g r o u p in g s i n w hich th e y a r e su p po sed t o s t a y and a g a i n s t w hich b a r r i e r s have been e r e c t e d to p r e v e n t t h e i r r i s e . " 2® Some o f th e s e m i- c a s te b a r r i e r s a p p e a r to have been lo w e re d d u r in g th e World War I I p e r i o d , when t h e r e were i n c r e a s e d employment o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r M exicans a t h i g h e r wages and i n more d i v e r s e o c c u p a t i o n s . 29 2® T aylor, op . c i t . , p p . 250-77* 27 w a l t e r G o ldschm id t, As You Sow (New Y ork: Har- c o u r t B race and C o ., 1947), P* 59* 2®Tuck, op . c i t . , p. 4 4 . 2 9 c h a r l e s p. Marden, M i n o r i t i e s i n American S o c i e t y (New York: American Book Co., 1 9 5 2 ), p. 139* A lso, I t sh o u ld be remembered t h a t e v e r sin c e e a r l i e r p e r i o d s o f h i s t o r y , Mexicans have I n t e r m a r r i e d w ith Anglos, and th o ro u g h ly C a u c a so id -a p p e a rin g i n d i v i d u a l s have seldom s u f f e r e d from an i n f e r i o r c a s t e p o s i t i o n . N e v e r th e le s s , w ith r e s t r i c t e d I n t e r m a r r i a g e , th e t a c i t o r e x p l i c i t s u p e r i o r - i n f e r i o r n a t u r e o f e th n i c r e l a t i o n s , and th e l i m i t a t i o n o f Mexicans to c e r t a i n ty p e s o f jo b s , the p o s i t i o n o f th e Mexicans s t i l l ap p ro x im ate s e m i- c a s te . L a s s w e l l 's p o s t- w a r stu d y o f " C itr u s C ity " showed an a c c e p te d c a s t e - l i k e dichotom y i n t o "w hite" and "M exicans," w ith th e l a t t e r group c o n s id e r e d even by l i b e r a l w h ite r e s i d e n t s as an i n f e r i o r s u b d i v i s i o n . M arriage between th e two grou ps was s a i d to be " u n th in k a b le ," In L a s s w e l l 's f i r s t s e r i e s o f i n t e r v i e w s r e s p o n d e n ts ten d e d to i d e n t i f y a s e p a r a t e s t r a t i f i c a t i o n p a t t e r n f o r each group, a lth o u g h when a c t u a l f a m i l i e s were s t r a t i f i e d th e ten d en cy was not as s t r o n g . Some Mexican f a m i l i e s were p la c e d i n th e upper s t r a t a and some Anglos i n th e low er s t r a t a . 3° R o g e rs' r e c e n t stu d y o f "O rchard C ity ," a town in c e n t r a l C a l i f o r n i a , showed t h a t e th n ic d i s c r i m i n a t i o n w i t h in th e community c l e a r l y d i s t i n g u i s h e d M exican-Americans o n D L a s s w e ll, op. c i t . , p . 8 5 . 21 and A nglos: " P e e lin g s tow ard th e Mexican group were q u i t e com parable to th o se i d e n t i f i e d as ' r a c e 1 f e e l i n g s in o t h e r s e c t i o n s o f th e U n ited S t a t e s . " 3 1 In th e s o u th e rn C olorado r u r a l c o m m u n i t y s t u d i e d by Watson and Samora i t was shown t h a t "th e A n g lo -S p an ish r e l a t i o n s h i p h as some o f th e p r o p e r t i e s o f a c a s t e system . Spanish and Anglo a re p r a c t i c a l l y endogamous." 3 2 For so u th e rn Texas Simmons r e p o r t s i n t e r e t h n i c r e l a t i o n s as s t i l l a p p ro x im a tin g s e m i - c a s t e .33 The a p p a r e n t l y low r a t e o f Anglo-Mexican i n t e r m a rria g e i s i n d i c a t i v e o f t h i s ty p e o f i n t e r - e t h n i c r e l a t i o n s h i p . I n t e r e s t i n g l y enough, c o n tr a r y to th e u s u a l ten d e n cy o f m in o r i t y group men to o u t-m a rry more th a n th e 34 women do, i n Los A ngeles County more M exlcan-Am erican women th a n men m arry o u t , w heth er to w h ite o r to o t h e r r a c e s . Burma b e l i e v e s t h a t i n t e r m a r r i a g e i s more common a t th e u p p e r and lo w er c l a s s l e v e l s th a n a t th e m iddle ^ R o g e r s , pp. c i t . , p. 88. 3^Watson and Samora, l o c . c i t . , p. 4 l6 . 33simmons, op. c i t . , p. 29- 34sim pSOn and Y ln g er, l o c . c i t . , p . 555* 22 c l a s s l e v e l . P e rc e p tio n o f S t a tu s D iff e r e n c e s The l i t e r a t u r e on th e p e r c e p tio n o f s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s i s too v a s t t o be summarized i n a few p a g es. R a th e r, th e r e s e a r c h e r w i l l rev iew n o tio n s from t h i s l i t e r a t u r e which d i r e c t l y in f lu e n c e d th e d esig n o f the stu d y , p lu s the l i t e r a t u r e d e a lin g s p e c i f i c a l l y w ith th e p e r c e p tio n o f s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s in Mexican-American com m u n itie s . The i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s between R e s p o n d e n ts ’ p e r c e p tio n s and r e s e a r c h e r s ' p e r c e p tio n s a re s t r e s s e d i n th e a v a i l a b l e s t u d i e s i n t h i s a r e a . C a rls so n , f o r example, n o te s t h a t : To a s c e r t a i n p e o p l e 1s b e l i e f s about c l a s s and s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e i s , o f c o u rs e , no s u b s t i t u t e f o r th e s o c i a l s c i e n t i s t ’ s own a n a l y s i s and i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , b u t such a stu d y may p ro v id e him w ith e s s e n t i a l d a t a . 36 On th e o t h e r hand, i t i s im p o rta n t n o t to a tte m p t to fo rc e a p re c o n c e iv e d c l a s s s t r u c t u r e upon th e d a ta . W e a re 35john H. Burma, S panish -S p eak in g Groups i n th e U n ited S t a t e s (Durham: Duke U n iv e r s ity P re s s , 195^)> p. 88. /* G osta C a rls so n , S o c ia l M o b ility and C lass S tr u c t u r e (Lund: C. W . K. G leerup , 1958)., p. 19* 23 w arned by N elson and L a s s w e ll t h a t t h e r e I s no r i g i d fram ew ork w hich can be l a i d o v e r s o c i e t y by w hich to draw an a b s o l u t e s o c i a l c l a s s h i e r a r c h y ; t h a t t h e r e i s no s i n g l e 'a b s o lu te * o r 'r e a l * c l a s s c o n s t r u c t ; t h a t s o c i a l c l a s s i s d ep en d e n t n o t on a s e r i e s o f v a r i a b l e s advanced by a r e s e a r c h e r and r i g h t l y o r w ro n g ly m a n ip u la te d by him . . . . When s o c i a l c l a s s a s an i r r e d u c i b l e con c e p t has been ta k e n i n t o th e f i e l d and p r e s e n t e d to a s e r i e s o f r a t e r s w id e ly d i f f e r e n t i a t e d as to c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , c o n se n su s as to th e number o f c l a s s e s and r e a s o n s f o r a ssig n m e n t h a s been f a r s h o r t o f a t t a i n m e n t . I n s t e a d o f a c c e p t in g t h i s f o r what i t i s , a s o c i a l f a c t , th e r e s e a r c h e r . . . h as com pounded th e problem by c o n s t r u c t i n g and d e v i s i n g t e c h n iq u e s to re d u c e a l l s i t u a t i o n s , a l l tim e , and a l l p e rs o n s to s t a b l e , un ch an g in g u n i t s . . . and th e n a t t r i b u t e d to them an a r t i f i c i a l r a t i o n a l i t y w hich i s r e a l o n ly to th e r e s e a r c h e r . 37 I t i s g r a t u i t o u s t o assume t h a t a l l p e rs o n s p e r c e iv e c l a s s o r o t h e r s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s . In d e e d , some p e o p le deny t h a t t h e y do. Thus I t i s d e s i r a b l e f i r s t to a sk re s p o n d e n ts what d i f f e r e n c e s t h e y do n o te among t h e i r f e l l o w s , to see I f s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s a r e i n c l u d e d , and I f t h e s e a r e o f prim e Im p o rta n c e . In h i s s tu d y o f V e n tu ra , C a l i f o r n i a , S a rg e n t was c a r e f u l n o t t o f o r c e q u e s t io n s on s o c i a l c l a s s , s t a t u s o r o t h e r s o c i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l s by ^ H a r o l d A. N elson and Thomas E. L a s s w e ll, " S ta tu s I n d i c e s , S o c ia l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n and S o c i a l C l a s s ," S o c i o l ogy and S o c ia l R e s e a rc h , XLIV ( J u ly - A u g u s t, i 9 6 0 ), 413. 24 assum ing t h a t such were p e r c e i v e d by a l l p e r s o n s . B efo re any m en tio n was made o f s t a t u s p e r c e p t i o n , S a rg e n t a sk ed t h i s q u e s t i o n : "What would you sa y a re t h e m ost im p o r ta n t d i f f e r e n c e s fo und among th e p e o p le o f V en tu ra ? T hat i s , what d i f f e r e n t g ro u p s o r c a t e g o r i e s would you d i v i d e them i n t o ? "38 S a rg e n t r e p o r t e d t h a t c l a s s o r s t a t u s c a t e g o r i e s t o t a l e d 31 p e r c e n t o f th e a n sw e rs, w h ile ab o u t 35 o r . 40 p e r c e n t o f th e an sw ers were o r i e n t e d tow ard c l a s s o r so cioecono m ic s t a t u s . From a b o u t a f o u r t h to a t h i r d o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts w ere i g n o r a n t o f , o r c o n fu se d by, th e c o n c e p t o f s o c i a l c l a s s . S o c ia l c l a s s e s a re g e n e r a l l y conceded to be "co n s t r u c t s w hich men have im posed upon c e r t a i n o b j e c t i v e l y e x i s t e n t phenomena as t h e y a re p e r c e i v e d and c o g n i t i v e l y r e a c t e d to by t h e m ."39 While some s o c i a l s c i e n t i s t s , W arner f o r exam ple, t h i n k o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s as s t a t u s l e v e l s and p a r t i c i p a t i o n g ro u p s , o t h e r s such as C e n te rs ■consider them a s r a t h e r l o o s e l y s t r u c t u r e d i n t e r e s t S t a n s f e l d S a r g e n t, " C la s s and C la s s - C o n sc io u sn e ss i n a C a l i f o r n i a Town," S o c ia l Problem s, I (Ju n e , 19 5 3 ), 2 3 . 3 ^ R ic h ard C e n te r s , "Toward an A r t i c u l a t i o n o f Two A pproaches to S o c i a l C la s s Phenom ena," I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f O pinion and A t t i t u d e R e s e a rc h , IV (W in ter, 1 9 5 0 ), 500. 25 g r o u p s . ^ 0 C la s s e s a re d e r i v e d In W a rn e r's c a se from c l a s s a s c r i p t i o n / In C e n t e r 's c ase from c l a s s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . ^ 1 These a r e , o f c o u rs e , p e r c e p t i o n s by r e s e a r c h e r s and n o t p r i m a r i l y by in f o r m a n ts , a s i n th e c a se o f th e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h . The w r i t e r found i t n e c e s s a r y t o number h i m s e l f among th o s e r e s e a r c h e r s who a re ’’r e l u c t a n t to a c c e p t a p r i o r i and have been u n a b le to d i s c o v e r e m p i r i c a l l y t h e r e a l i t y o f c l a s s i n th e sen se o f f u l l y d e v e lo p e d s h a r p l y d e f in e d s t r a t a co m p rise d o f i n d i v i d u a l s who a re aware o f t h e i r p o s i t i o n s and c a p a b le o f c o r p o r a t e a c t i o n . L a s s w e l l 's s t u d y o f C i t r u s C ity (n e a r Pomona and i n many ways s i m i l a r ) r e v e a l e d "a community i n w hich an a r e a sample o f r e s i d e n t s d id n o t c o n c e p tu a li z e a s r i g i d a p a t t e r n o f s o c i a l c l a s s s t r a t i f i c a t i o n as r e s e a r c h e r s u s in g s e l e c t e d r a t e r s have r e p o r t e d to e x i s t i n o t h e r 4oI b i d . , pp. 5 03 -5 0 5 . ^ I b i d . , p. 513. ^ L e o n a r d Broom, " S o c ia l D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n and S t r a t i f i c a t i o n , " i n R o b e rt K. M erton, L eonard Broom and L eo nard S. C o t t r e l l , J r . , e d s . , S o c io lo g y Today: Problem s and P r o s p e c t s (New Y ork: B a sic Books, 1959)> P* ^35* 26 c o m m u n i t i e s . " ^ i t h as a i So been shown t h a t as o n e 's s o c i a l c l a s s d i f f e r s , th e image o f th e s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e one has a l s o v a r i e s . ^ The lo w e r s t r a t a , p a r t i c u l a r l y , o f t e n have l i t t l e know ledge o r " f e e l " f o r th e s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e o f t h e i r co m m unities. P e rso n s i n th e s e s t r a t a a r e f r e q u e n t l y i n a r t i c u l a t e c o n c e rn in g c a t e g o r i e s o f p e o p le and f i n d i t d i f f i c u l t to t h i n k a b s t r a c t l y . 46 On th e o t h e r hand, t o u p p e r c l a s s p e rs o n s f i n e c l a s s d i s t i n c t i o n s a r e o f more im p o rta n c e , and t h e s e p e o p le g e n e r a l l y have s u p e r i o r e d u c a tio n . The lo w er c l a s s p e r son has p e rh a p s n o t r e a d a b o u t o r d i s c u s s e d such m a t t e r s , and i n any c ase i s more c o n ce rn e d w ith th e prob lem s o f making a l i v i n g and c a r i n g f o r h i s f a m i l y 's b a re n e c e s s i t i e s . K ah l, however, b e l i e v e s t h a t " p e o p le make th e ^ T h o m a s E. L a s s w e ll, " R e p ly ," American S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , XX (F e b ru a ry , 1 9 5 5 )j 83* 44w. Lloyd W arner, M archia Meeker and K enneth E e l l s , S o c i a l C lass i n America (New York: H arper & B r o s ., i 9 6 0 ), p. 19* ^ X jeo n a rd Schatzman and Anselm S t r a u s s , " S o c ia l C la ss and Modes o f C om m u n icatio n ," American J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , LX (J a n u a ry , 1955)* 338. 46 W. Lloyd W arner, American L i f e : Dream and R e a l i t y (C h icag o : U n i v e r s i t y o f Chicago P r e s s , 1953)* p p . 143-44 . f i n e s t d i s t i n c t i o n s r e g a r d i n g th o s e whom th e y know h e s t and te n d t o merge o t h e r s i n t o b r o a d e r c a t e g o r i e s . "^7 i f we would v a l i d l y d e s c r i b e t h e community c o n s e n s u s , i f su ch e x i s t s , we s h o u ld have a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e sam ple o f o p i n i o n s , a d h e rin g t o th e a ssu m p tio n t h a t " e f f e c t i v e s t a t u s judgm ents may be made by any o r a l l members o f a community who a r e i n i n t e r a c t i o n , and t h a t t h e s e judgm ents may f u r n i s h a t l e a s t a p a r t i a l b a s i s f o r d i f f e r e n t i a l a t t i t u d e s and b e h a v io r to w ard d i f f e r e n t c a t e g o r i e s o f community mem bers."^® The number o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d by in f o r m a n t s i s a c r u c i a l v a r i a b l e . Cuber and- K enkel b e l i e v e t h a t i n a g iv e n community t h e r e a re a lm o st as many s o c i a l c l a s s sy stem s as t h e r e a r e o b s e r v e r s , w h e th e r th e o b s e r v e r s be to w n sp eo p le o r r e s e a r c h e r s . ^9 j n L a s s w e l l 's f i r s t s e r i e s o f i n t e r v i e w s i n C i t r u s C ity , f o r exam ple, no s i n g l e num b e r o f s t r a t a was a g re e d upon by more th a n 17 p e r c e n t o f ^ J o s e p h A. K ahl, The American C la s s S t r u c t u r e (New York: R in e h a r t and C o., 1 9 5 7)> P* 32. ^®Thomas E. L a s s w e ll, "A Study o f S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n Using an Area Sample o f R a t e r s , " American S o c i o l o g i c a l Review, XIX (Ju n e , 195^)* 310. ^ J o h n F. Cuber and W illiam F. K enkel, S o c ia l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s (New York: A p p le to n - C e n tu ry C r o f t s , 195^)* h i s r e s p o n d e n t s . 5 0 in th e second s e r i e s o f i n t e r v i e w s , where in f o r m a n ts were a sk e d to p l a c e d e f i n i t e f a m i l i e s , no number o f s t r a t a was chosen by more th a n 32 p e r c e n t o f h i s r e s p o n d e n t s . S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n M exican-A m erican Communities A lthough r e s e a r c h e r s i n th e M exican-A m erican f i e l d have each come up w ith a f a i r l y d e f i n i t e d e s c r i p t i o n o f th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e f o r eac h community s t u d i e d , t h e r e i s o n ly p a r t i a l agreem ent a s betw een th e com m unities. Such • l a c k o f agreem ent may be due e i t h e r t o d i f f e r e n t c on cep t u a l i z a t i o n s by r e s e a r c h e r s o r to th e n a t u r e o f th e com m u n it i e s th e m s e lv e s . Two o v e r a l l view s o f th e M exican-A m erican c l a s s system have been g iv e n by Scherm erhorn and Burma i n t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e s u rv e y s o f th e l i t e r a t u r e . S cherm erhorn d e s c r i b e s th e M exican American s t a t u s system as f o l lo w s : At th e bottom o f th e s c a l e a r e th e m ig r a to r y w o rk e rs, and t h e a g r i c u l t u r a l l a b o r e r s , who a re th e m ost m o b ile . . . . Among th e more s e t t l e d com m unities t h e r e i s a k in d o f tw o fo ld c l a s s ■ ^ L a ssw ell, "A S tud y o f S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n Using an Area Sample o f R a t e r s , " p. 311 • 29 d i v i s i o n : an u p p e r group o f 'b i g p e o p le ' who have su c ce ed e d i n term s o f American m iddle c l a s s s t a n d a r d s , t o g e t h e r w ith a d i s o r g a n iz e d f r i n g e ; and th e l a r g e mass o f common p e o p le , w ith t h e i r d i s o r g a n iz e d f r i n g e .51 Burma sp eak s a ls o o f a tw o - f o ld d i v i s i o n . The lo w er c l a s s i s " p o v e r t y - s t r i c k e n , d w e llin g in h o v e ls , f o llo w in g th e h a r v e s t o r doing manual day l a b o r , sem i i l l i t e r a t e , w ith l i t t l e hope f o r th e f u t u r e . "52 At th e bottom o f th e m iddle c l a s s a r e th e r a i l r o a d w o rk e rs and s e m i s k i l l e d i n d u s t r i a l w o rk e rs; h i g h e r a r e th e s k i l l e d w o rk e rs, i n d u s t r i a l a r t i s a n s , and th e s m a ll e r b u sin e ssm e n . . . . Most o f th e s e p e o p le own t h e i r own homes, a re r e s p e c t a b l e , l i t e r a t e c i t i z e n s , and send t h e i r c h i l d r e n to p u b l i c s c h o o ls , som etim es t o c o l l e g e . 53 Burma a s s e r t s t h a t th e a v erag e Anglo p e r c e i v e s two c l a s s e s , lo w er and m id d le , b u t t h a t M exicans g e n e r a l l y d i v id e th e c o lo n ia i n t o t h r e e by b r e a k in g down th e m id dle c l a s s i n t o an u p p e r c l a s s and a m id d le c l a s s . 54 Among th o s e who have c o n d u c te d f i r s t - h a n d e m p i r i c a l r e s e a r c h , L a s s w e ll p o i n t e d o u t t h a t a lth o u g h some 51 R. A. S cherm erhorn, These Our People (B oston: D. C. H eath and Co., 1949)> PP* 189-90. 52Burma, op. c i t ., p. 94. 5 3 i b i d . , pp. 9 4 - 9 5 . 5 ^ i b i d , , p. 94. 30 would e x p e c t t h a t Mexicans i n C i tr u s C ity m ig h t d e s c r i b e a more complex s t r a t i f i c a t i o n p a t t e r n f o r t h e i r own group th a n f o r th e A nglos, no M exican in fo rm a n t i d e n t i f i e d more th a n two c l a s s e s w ith in h i s own g ro u p , b u t some i d e n t i f i e d f o u r Anglo c l a s s e s . A f te r d e s c r i b i n g San B e r n a r d i n o 's t w o - c l a s s system Tuck n o te d t h a t " to t r y to make i t f i t a t r i p l e d i v i s i o n o f ’u p p e r , ’ ’l o w e r , ’ and ’m i d d l e ’ i s to v i o l a t e th e d i s t i n c t i o n s w hich i t s members make and t h e te rm s i n w hich th e y e x p r e s s th e m ." ^ ^ C la rk d e s c r i b e d a t w o - c l a s s system f o r th e Mexican community o f San J o s e , C a l i f o r n i a , a lth o u g h th e two c l a s s e s were s a i d to be p o o r ly d e f i n e d : The ’h i g h e r c l a s s ’ mem bers' d e s c r i p t i o n o f th e c o lo n y ’ s c l a s s s t r u c t u r e i s s i m i l a r to th e view o f M exican-A m erican s o c i e t y h e ld by t h e San Jo se A nglos, who f o r th e m ost p a r t r e f e r to S p a n is h sp e a k in g p e o p le as e i t h e r ’low c l a s s ' o r 'h i g h c l a s s . '57 Simmons d e s c r i b e d t h e M exican-A m erican community o f McAllen, T exas i n term s o f a tw o - c l a s s system w ith ^ L a s s w e l l , " S ta tu s S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n a S e l e c te d Community," pp. 116-17* 5 6 i» u c k , o p . c i t ., p. 133* - ^ C la r k , op. c i t ., p p . 16-19* 31 v a ry in g s u b d i v i s i o n s . 58 T here i s g e n e r a l a g re e m e n t i n th e McAllen Mexican_£ommunity t h a t p r o f e s s i o n a l s , l a r g e l a n d - o w n e r - f a r m e r s , and th e s u b s t a n t i a l b u sin e ssm e n a r e m id d le c l a s s . Between t h i s s m a ll g ro u p and th e l a r g e lo w e r c l a s s i s a m id d le g ro u p o f w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e rs and s m a ll sh o p k e e p e r s , who form t h e lo w er segm ent o f th e m id d le c l a s s . Lehman w r i t e s t h a t t h e M exicans o f n e a r b y Chino occu py t h r e e s o c i a l l e v e l s , e a c h o f w hich l i v e s i n a d i f f e r e n t r e s i d e n t i a l s e c t i o n o f th e c i t y . The h i g h e s t c l a s s l i v e among Anglos o f a p p ro x im a te ly t h e same so c io ec o n o m ic s t a t u s . 59 When B a rk e r s t u d i e d T u c so n ’ s M exican community i n t h e 1 9 4 0 's i t had a b o u t 2 0 ,0 0 0 p o p u l a t i o n , p e rh a p s th e l a r g e s t M exican community whose c l a s s s t r u c t u r e h a s been a n a ly z e d . He d i s t i n g u i s h e d f i v e so c io ec o n o m ic c l a s s e s : ( l ) an u p p e r c l a s s o f w e a lth y "Old F a m i l i e s " ; (2) a lo w e r- u p p e r c l a s s o f y o u n g e r and l e s s w e l l e s t a b l i s h e d members o f th e u p p e r g ro u p who l i v e "on b o th s i d e s o f th e t r a c k s " ; 5 ® S im m o n s, o p . c i t . , p . 339- 5 9 v i c b o r Boyd Lehman, "A S tudy o f t h e S o c i a l A d ju stm en t o f th e M exican A m ericans i n Chino and a P r o p o s e d P la n o f Community A c tio n u n d e r School L e a d e r s h ip " ( u n p u b lis h e d M a s t e r 's t h e s i s , C larem o n t G ra d u a te S c h o o l, 1 9 4 7 ). 32 (3 ) a m id d le c l a s s o f s m a ll s h o p k e e p e r s , c l e r k s and s k i l l e d w o rk e rs ; (4 ) an u p p e r - lo w e r c l a s s o f s t e a d i l y em ployed u n s k i l l e d o r s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk e rs ; and (5) a lo w e r c l a s s o f u n s k i l l e d m ig ra n t w o r k e r s . 6 ° C r i t e r i a o f S t r a t i f i c a t i o n The s o c i a l l e v e l s p e r c e i v e d i n t h e s t u d i e s o f t h e s e M exican com m unities may be c o n c e iv e d o f a s s t e r e o t y p e s . They a re o f th e ty p e w hich L a s s w e ll c a l l s ’’group s t e r e o t y p e s . " L a s s w e ll n o t e s t h a t : T here a r e many g ro u p s t e r e o t y p e s o f s o c i a l c l a s s i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s , accom p an ied by norms and s a n c t i o n s . A p a r t o f th e p e r s o n 's c o n c e p tio n o f l o c a l s o c i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n , t h e y a r e a p p l i e d to p e r s o n s w i t h whom one i s i n a c t u a l o r p o t e n t i a l i n t e r a c t i o n i n a r e l a t i v e l y i m p o r t a n t w a y . 61 Such s t e r e o t y p e s o f c o u r s e , n e ed n o t c o in c id e w i t h th e s t e r e o t y p e s b r o u g h t to h i s work by th e r e s e a r c h e r from h i s p e r u s a l o f th e l i t e r a t u r e o r from h i s i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h r e s p o n d e n t s . As C e n te r s n o t e s , 6 ° B a r k e r , l o c . c i t . , pp. l 8 9 - 92. 6liphomas E. L a s s w e ll, " O r i e n t a t i o n s Toward S o c i a l C l a s s e s , " Am erican J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , XLV (May, i 9 6 0 ), 587. 33 C la s s e s a re p s y c h o - s o c i a l g ro u p in g s , som ething t h a t i s e s s e n t i a l l y s u b j e c t i v e i n c h a r a c t e r , depen d en t upon c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s ( i . e . a f e e l i n g o f group m em bersh ip), and c l a s s l i n e s o f c le a v a g e may o r may n o t conform t o what seem to s o c i a l s c i e n t i s t s t o be l o g i c a l l i n e s o f c le a v a g e i n th e o b j e c t i v e o r s t r a t i f i c a t i o n s e n s e . 62 T h is phenomenon o f d i f f e r e n t i a l p e r c e p t i o n has a ls o been n o te d by D a v is : "T here a re many gaps i n th e p e r c e p t i o n o f s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e and . . . su b g ro u p in g s which a re q u i t e obv iou s, to some p e o p le are j u s t n o t seen as su c h by o t h e r s . "63 F u rth e rm o re , a c c o rd in g to L a n d e c k e r 's D e t r o i t s tu d y , b o th a continuum and d i s c r e t e c l a s s e s may p o s s i b l y be found i n th e same s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e : The view s u g g e s te d by t h e s e f i n d i n g s i s t h a t n e i t h e r th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e n o r th e s t a t u s continuum h y p o th e s i s t a k e s p re c e d e n c e o v e r th e o t h e r , but r a t h e r t h a t eac h i s a p p r o p r i a t e to a d i f f e r e n t p o r t i o n o f th e t o t a l system o f s t r a t i f i c a t i o n . 64 Numerous i n v e s t i g a t o r s have d e m o n s tra te d t h a t in ; #-------------- ^ 2R ic h a rd C e n te r s , The P sychology o f S o c ia l C la s s e s ( P r i n c e t o n : P r in c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1949)> p . -2 7 . ^ J a m e s a . D a v is, " C u l t u r a l F a c to r s i n th e P e r c e p t i o n o f S t a t u s Sym bols," Midwest S o c i o l o g i s t , XXI (December, 19 5 8 ), 10, c i t e d by Thomas E. L a s s w e ll, " S o c ia l C l a s s e s as A f f e c t i v e C a t e g o r i e s , " S o c io lo g y and S o c ia l R e s e a r c h , XLVI ( A p r il, 1 9 6 2), 313- 6^W erner S. L an d e ck e r, "C la ss B o u n d a r ie s ," American S o c i o l o g i c a l Review , XXV (December, i 9 6 0 ), 877- s t a t u s p e r c e p t i o n and e v a l u a t i o n more t h a n one c r i t e r i o n i s a lm o s t u n i v e r s a l l y i n v o l v e d . I n C e n t e r 's s t u d y th e f o u r m ost f r e q u e n t l y m e n tio n e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s w ere b e l i e f s , e d u c a t i o n , f a m i l y and m o n e y . ^5 T h ere i s u s u a l l y e i t h e r a t a c i t o r an e x p l i c i t a s s u m p tio n t h a t th e v a r i o u s c r i t e r i a u s e d c o r r e l a t e d h i g h l y w i t h e a c h o t h e r , i . e . , e a c h i n d i v i d u a l i s assum ed t o have a c e r t a i n c o n s i s t e n c y a b o u t h i s s t a t u s , a l t h o u g h e m p i r i c a l l y I t i s known t h a t t h e r e a r e many e x c e p t i o n s . L e n s k i 's D e t r o i t s t u d y showed some f a m i l i e s r a n k in g h ig h on a l l f o u r v a r i a b l e s u s e d (in co m e, e d u c a t i o n , o c c u p a t i o n , e t h n i c i t y ) , some low on a l l , some f a m i l i e s low on some and h i g h on o t h e r s . ^ Such s t a t u s I n c o n s i s t e n c y w ould a p p e a r I n t h e c a s e o f t h o s e M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n s, h a v in g a low e t h n i c i t y r a t i n g , b u t who may have a h i g h r a t i n g on one o f t h e o t h e r t h r e e v a r i a b l e s . R e l i g i o n I s a c l a s s - r e l a t e d v a r i a b l e t h e im p o r ta n c e o f w hich i s i n c r e a s i n g l y s t r e s s e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e , a l t h o u g h t h e r e l a t i v e h o m o g e n e ity o f t h e M exican -A m erican ^ C e n t e r s , o p . c i t . , pp. 7 8 - 8 8 . 66 G e rh a rd L e n s k i, " S o c i a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n and S t a t u s C r y s t a l l i z a t i o n , " A m erican S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , XXI (A u g u st, 1 9 5 6 ), 458. 35 p o p u la tio n w ith r e f e r e n c e to r e l i g i o n makes r e l i g i o u s a f f i l i a t i o n l e s s u s e f u l i n s t u d i e s such as th e p r e s e n t one. L e n sk i, however, a s s e r t s t h a t th e range o f v a r i a b l e s a f f e c t e d by r e l i g i o u s a f f i l i a t i o n seems t o be as g r e a t as t h a t a f f e c t e d by c l a s s mem bership. " S o c i o - r e l ig i o u s group membership i s a v a r i a b l e com parable in im po rtance t o c l a s s , b o th w ith r e s p e c t to i t s p o ten c y and w ith r e s p e c t to th e ra n g e , o r e x t e n t , o f i t s i n f l u e n c e . " ^ On th e o t h e r hand, w h e th er i n d i v i d u a l s use r e l i g i o n as a c r i t e r i o n f o r e v a lu a tin g , o t h e r s ' s t a t u s , i s a q u e s tio n to be d e cid ed by e m p ir ic a l r e s e a r c h . As a m a t t e r o f f a c t , however, in many s t u d i e s o f s t a t u s ' system s we do n o t know which c r i t e r i a a r e b e in g u sed by re s p o n d e n ts . As B arb er sa y s, W e do n o t know i f p e o p le in a l o c a l community are b ein g ran k e d on th e b a s i s o f t h e i r f u n c t i o n a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t s o c i a l r o l e s , income, i n h e r i t e d w e a lth , a n c e s t r y o r s o c i a l i n f l u e n c e . . . . I t i s very l i k e l y t h a t d i f f e r e n t i n d i v i d u a l s i n th e community a re u s in g d i f f e r e n t c r i t e r i a o f e v a l u a t i o n , b u t t h e r e i s no way o f knowing what c r i t e r i a a re being used o r who i s u sin g which c r i t e r i o n . 68 ^ G e r h a r d L e n sk i, The R e lig io u s F a c to r (Garden C ity , New York: Doubleday and Co., 1961), p. 2 9 5. B ernard B a rb e r, S o c ia l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n (New York: H a rc o u rt B race and Co., 1 9 5 7 ), P* 117* 36 V a r io u s c r i t e r i a h av e b e e n d i s c u s s e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e on M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n c o m m u n itie s . In San J o s e , f o r e x a m p le , C l a r k fo u n d t h a t t h e c r i t e r i a w ere p r i m a r i l y incom e and s t a n d a r d o f l i v i n g , b u t a l s o s p e e c h , e d u c a t i o n , o c c u p a t i o n a n d p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h i p . ^9 In San B e r n a r d i n o p e o p le w i t h good m an n e rs and an i n t e r e s t i n c u l t i v a t e d ways w ere t h o u g h t o f a s members o f t h e e d u c a t e d c l a s s , e v e n th o u g h t h e i r f o r m a l e d u c a t i o n m ig h t n o t be e x t e n s i v e . Money a c h i e v e d th r o u g h sh a d y o r e x p l o i t a t i v e a c t i v i t i e s d i d n o t b r i n g h i g h s t a t u s . 7 ° Simmons c i t e d o c c u p a t i o n a s t h e c h i e f c r i t e r i o n o f s t a t u s i n M cA llen and San A n to n io , b u t n o t e d t h a t r e l a t i v e s t a t u s w i t h i n t h e m id d le c l a s s i s a l s o d e p e n d e n t on e d u c a t i o n , f a m i l y b a c k g r o u n d , i n t e r e s t i n t h e M exican g r o u p , and r e p u t a t i o n a s a l e a d e r o f t h e M exican com m unity and r e a d i n e s s t o s e r v e i t . 71 In t h e 1 9 2 0 's Gamio n o t e d t h a t d a rk s k i n n e d M e x ica n s s u f f e r e d a b o u t t h e same t y p e o f d i s c r i m i n a t i o n a s N e g ro e s , b u t t h a t medium c o m p le c te d M exican s w ere a b l e 6 9 c i a r k , op. c i t ., p. 1 9 . 70ipuck, op. c i t ., p. 135- 71sim m ons, o p . c i t ., p p . 3 5 8 -6 6 . 37 t o u s e s e c o n d - c l a s s p u b l i c f a c i l i t i e s . Even l i g h t - brown s k i n n e d M e x ic a n s w ere e x c l u d e d from h i g h c l a s s f a c i l i t i e s , w h i l e w h i t e M e x ica n s m ig h t be f r e e l y a d m i t t e d , e s p e c i a l l y i f t h e y sp o k e f l u e n t E n g l i s h . S o c i a l a n d O c c u p a t i o n a l M o b i l i t y In i t s m o st g e n e r a l s e n s e , s o c i a l m o b i l i t y may be d e f i n e d a s "a n y t r a n s i t i o n o f an i n d i v i d u a l o r s o c i a l o b j e c t o r v a l u e - - a n y t h i n g t h a t h a s b e e n c r e a t e d o r m o d i f i e d by human a c t i v i t y - - f r o m one s o c i a l p o s i t i o n t o a n o t h e r . "73 S o c i a l m o b i l i t y i s g e n e r a l l y c o n c e d e d t o o c c u r i n two p r i n c i p a l , i n t e r r e l a t e d m odes, h o r i z o n t a l a n d v e r t i c a l . The l a t t e r i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s " t h e r e l a t i o n s i n v o l v e d i n a t r a n s i t i o n o f an i n d i v i d u a l ( o r a s o c i a l o b j e c t ) from one s o c i a l s t r a t u m to a n o t h e r . "7^ V e r t i c a l m o b i l i t y , w h ic h h a s b e e n t r e a t e d i n t h e p r e s e n t r e p o r t p r i m a r i l y i n o c c u p a t i o n a l te r m s may o c c u r i n s e v e r a l w a y s: ( l ) o c c u p a t i o n a l c h a n g e i n v o l v i n g a c h a n g e "^ M an u el Gam io, M ex ican I m m ig r a tio n t o t h e U n ite d S t a t e s ( C h ic a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C h ic a g o P r e s s , 1 9 3 0 ) , P . 5 3 . 7 3 p i t i r l m A. S o r o k i n , S o c i a l and C u l t u r a l M o b il i t y ( G le n c o e : F r e e P r e s s , 1959)* P* 133* 7 ^ I b i d . 38 i n s o c i a l p o s i t i o n ; (2) p ro m o tio n o r dem otion w i t h in a s p e c i f i c o c c u p a t i o n a l g ro u p ; (3 ) a g in g o r s e n i o r i t y ; (4) i n t e r g e n e r a t i o n a l o c c u p a ti o n a l c h a n g e s, p a r t i c u l a r l y betw een f a t h e r s and so n s ; (5) a s c e n t o r d e s c e n t o f an e n t i r e o c c u p a ti o n a l g r o u p . Tiie m a jo r s o u rc e s o f such m o b i l i t y a p p e a r to be th e r e l a t e d p r o c e s s e s o f i n d u s t r i a l i z a t i o n , u r b a n i z a t i o n and m i g r a t i o n . ^ These s o c i o dem ographic p r o c e s s e s i n t u r n can be r e l a t e d to changes i n th e c o m p o s itio n o f th e l a b o r f o r c e I t s e l f . The g e n e r a l m o b i l i t y s i t u a t i o n o f t h e M exican- American p o p u l a t i o n i s a n a lo g o u s t o t h a t o f th e U n ite d S t a t e s as a w h ole, d e s c r i b e d by Caplow: There a p p e a rs to be more o c c u p a t i o n a l a s c e n t th an d e s c e n t . Given th e c o n d i t i o n s o f an expand in g economy, i n w hich m a n a g e ria l and t e c h n i c a l f u n c t i o n s a r e ex p an d in g even r e l a t i v e l y , t h i s may w e ll be th e c a s e : t h e movement from c o u n tr y to c i t y . . . . The i n c r e a s e i n a v e ra g e e d u c a t i o n a l a c h ie v e m e n t, and t h e p r o g r e s s i v e a s s i m i l a t i o n o f w a g e -e a rn in g p o s i t i o n s i n t o th e m id d le c l a s s - - a l l a re w e ll-d o c u m e n te d t r e n d s w hich f a v o r upward m o b i l i t y . 77 ^ T h e o d o r e Caplow, The S o c io lo g y o f Work (M inneapo l i s : U n i v e r s i t y o f M in n eso ta P r e s s , 1 9 5 4 ), p . 60. ^ S e y m o u r M. L l p s e t and R e in h a rd B endix, S o c i a l M o b ility i n I n d u s t r i a l S o c ie ty ( B e rk e le y : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1 9 5 4 ), p . 204. ^ C a p lo w , op. c i t . , p. 79* 39 The r e s e a r c h e r h a s i n t e r p r e t e d v e r t i c a l m o b i l i t y i n term s o f i n t e r g e n e r a t i o n a l o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y . T h is a p p ro a c h h a s c e r t a i n s h o r tc o m in g s , p a r t i c u l a r l y th e p o s s i b i l i t y o f o v e r l o o k i n g a t l e a s t one i m p o r t a n t a s p e c t o f s o c i a l m o b il i t y , i . e . i n t r a - g e n e r a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y i n te rm s o f c han ges i n jo b s i n th e c a r e e r o f e i t h e r f a t h e r o r son. L i p s e t and B endix n o te d t h a t su c h c h a n g e s a r e r e l a t i v e l y more f r e q u e n t t h a n commonly th o u g h t, a l t h o u g h m ost m o b i l i t y i s c o n f i n e d t o w i t h i n e i t h e r th e m a n u a l- o c c u p a tio n c a t e g o r y o r to th e n o n m a n u a l-o c c u p a tio n c a t e g o r y , t h e r e b e in g l i t t l e movement from m anual to nonm anual j o b s .^ S A n o th e r p e r t i n e n t p ro b lem r e v o l v e s a b o u t th e c h o ic e o f an o c c u p a t i o n a l s c a l e , and t h e p o s s i b l e v a l i d i t y o f such a s c a l e . C o n s t r u c t i o n o f a s o p h i s t i c a t e d o c c u p a t i o n a l s c a l e w ould have b een a l a r g e - s c a l e r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t i n i t s e l f , p a r t i c u l a r l y s i n c e th e o c c u p a t i o n a l s t r u c t u r e o f th e M exican-A m erican community i s a t su c h v a r i a n c e w ith t h a t o f t h e g e n e r a l p o p u l a t i o n . Caplow h a s n o te d t h a t a l t h o u g h "no s i n g l e - d i m e n s i o n a l r a t i n g o f o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s w i l l s a t i s f a c t o r i l y r a n k t h e m a jo r o c c u p a ti o n s . . . " ^ L i p s e t and B en d ix , op. c i t . , p. 180. 4o o c c u p a t i o n a l d e s i g n a t i o n i s a t once a m ajo r i n d i c a t o r o f g e n e r a l s o c i a l p o s i t i o n . "79 Each m ajo r c a t e g o r y o f o c c u p a t i o n s , how ever, a c c o rd in g t o Alba Edwards, c h i e f d e s i g n e r o f t h e o c c u p a t i o n a l c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f th e B ureau o f t h e Census r e p r e s e n t s "a l a r g e p o p u l a t i o n gro u p w ith a some w hat d i s t i n c t i v e s t a n d a r d o f l i f e , and to a c o n s i d e r a b l e e x t e n t , i n t e l l e c t u a l l y and s o c i a l l y ." ® ^ I t i s i n te rm s o f such l a r g e c a t e g o r i e s t h a t t h e w r i t e r ’ s r e s e a r c h h a s b e en c o n d u c te d . He has a c c e p te d th e b a s i c a ssu m p tio n s i n h e r e n t i n m ost o c c u p a ti o n a l s c a l e s , I . e . , t h a t th e more s k i l l I n v o lv e d i n a Jo b , th e h i g h e r i t i s ra n k e d by t h e p o p u l a t i o n ; t h a t w h ite c o l l a r work r a n k s h i g h e r t h a n m anual w ork; t h a t se lf-e m p lo y m e n t s t a t u s i s p r e f e r a b l e to em ployee s t a t u s ; and t h a t c le a n Jobs ra n k h i g h e r th a n d i r t y J o b s . ^ l Caplow b e l i e v e s t h a t th e B ureau o f th e Census c a t e g o r i e s can be s l i g h t l y r e a r r a n g e d a s s i x " so c io -e c o n o m ic c l a s s e s , " v i z . , u n s k i l l e d w o rk e rs, 79caplow , op. c i t ., p. 57* 8 °Alba M. E dw ards, C om parative O c c u p a tio n a l S t a t i s t i c s f o r th e U n ite d S t a t e s , 1870-1940 (W ashington, D. C . : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 19 4 3)> P* 179* ^ C a p lo w , op. c i t . , pp. 42-43* 41 s e m i s k i l l e d w o rk e rs , s k i l l e d w o rk e rs , m anagers ( i n c l u d in g p r o p r i e t o r s and o f f i c i a l s ) and p r o f e s s i o n a l p e r s o n s .® 2 The l i t e r a t u r e on th e v e r t i c a l m o b i l i t y o f M ex ica n - A m ericans s t r e s s e s f o u r m ain a s p e c t s o f t h i s t o p i c : ( l ) th e r e l a t i v e l y s m a ll amount o f I t , (2) I t s t h r e a t to t h e -so c ia l s o l i d a r i t y and c u l t u r a l s u r v i v a l o f t h e g ro u p , (3) i t s i n c r e a s e i n r e c e n t y e a r s , (4) th e d i f f i c u l t y in d e te r m in in g i t s e x t e n t . E s p e c i a l l y s t r e s s e d i n th e l i t e r a t u r e i s th e id e a t h a t t h e m o b ile , more a c c u l t u r a t e d M exicans te n d to le a v e th e e t h n i c e n c la v e s and d i s a s s o c i a t e th e m s e lv e s from Mexican a c t i v i t i e s . A ccording to Broom and Shevky, one o f th e p ro b lem s i n th e a r e a o f s o c i a l d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n I s to d e te rm in e to what e x t e n t th e M exican grou p h a s l e f t m ig r a to r y l a b o r , become o c c u p a t i o n a l l y d i f f e r e n t i a t e d , i n c r e a s e d i t s s t a b i l i t y o f employment and a c h ie v e d v e r t i c a l m o b ility .® ® A p p a re n tly upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , to a c e r t a i n e x t e n t , h a s alw ays been common among Im m ig ran ts from M exico. T a y lo r q u o te s an A rizo na l a b o r a g e n t as s a y in g : Those who have j u s t come from Mexico a re th e b e s t . They a r e f i n e ; th e y d o n ’t know a n y th in g . A f te r 82I b i d . , p. 33. ®®Broom and Shevky, l o c . c i t ., p. 152. 42 t h e y have been h e re two o r t h r e e y e a r s th e y g e t A m ericanized; want b e t t e r h o u s e s , e t c . , and l e a v e . 84 McWilliams p r e d i c t e d a decade ago t h a t " in a n o th e r g e n e r a t i o n M exican-Am ericans w i l l be found i n a l l w alks o f l i f e - - i n th e a r t s , th e p r o f e s s i o n s , i n th e c o l l e g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s - - a n d i n s i g n i f i c a n t n u m b e r s . " ^ ^o a c e r t a i n e x t e n t , i f we lo o k a t th e t o t a l p i c t u r e i n S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , h i s p rop hecy has been h a l f - r e a l i z e d a t th e h a l f - g e n e r a t i o n mark; t h a t i s , Mexicans a r e found i n a l l w alks o f l i f e , b u t a r e n o t y e t found i n some o c c u p a ti o n a l f i e l d s in what co uld be c o n s id e r e d s i g n i f i c a n t num bers. The f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g th e m o b i l i t y o f th e M exican- American p o p u l a t i o n can be d iv id e d i n t o two c a t e g o r i e s , th o s e prom oting such m o b il i ty , and th o s e a c t i n g to r e t a r d i t . B ro a d ly sp e a k in g , th e most im p o r ta n t f a c t o r i s th e d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n to th e American m i d d l e - c l a s s way o f l i f e . The l i t e r a t u r e on th e s u b j e c t i s f a i r l y w e ll i n agreem en t t h a t c o n tin u in g ad h erence to Mexican c u l t u r a l v a lu e s and a f a i l u r e to a c c u l t u r a t e to th e m a j o r i t y c u l t u r e a re f a c t o r s r e t a r d i n g upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y f o r th e ®^Taylor, op. c i t ., p. 128. ^ M c W illia m s, op. c i t ., p. 302. M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n . 86 j t i s a p p a r e n t t h a t low s t a t u s , a low m o b i l i t y r a t e , and a low d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n a r e a l l i n t e r r e l a t e d i n t h e c a s e o f t h e M exican- Am erican p o p u l a t i o n . Hyman b e l i e v e s he can e x p l a i n th e r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een low s t a t u s and l a c k o f upw ard m o b il i t y by a system o f b e l i e f s and v a lu e s w i t h i n th e lo w e r c l a s s e s w h ich i n t u r n r e d u c e s t h e v e ry v o l u n t a r y a c t i o n s t h a t w ould a m e l i o r a t e t h e i r p o s i t i o n . . . . The com ponents o f t h i s v a lu e sy stem . . . i n v o l v e l e s s e m p h a sis upon t h e t r a d i t i o n a l h ig h s u c c e s s g o a l s , i n c r e a s e d a w a re n e s s o f t h e l a c k o f o p p o r t u n i t y t o a c h ie v e s u c c e s s , and l e s s em p hasis upon th e a c h ie v e m e n t o f g o a l s w hich i n t u r n would be i n s t r u m e n ta l f o r s u c c e s s . ^7 Kluckhohn i s one o f th o s e who have p o i n t e d o u t th e r e l e v a n c e o f t h e l a c k o f m o b i l i t y m o t i v a t i o n s among so many o f th e M exican -A m e ric a n s. The M exican-A m erican lo w e r c l a s s and th e A nglo-A m erican lo w e r c l a s s may i n many ways a c t u a l l y have more i n common w i t h e a c h o t h e r t h a n e i t h e r h a s w i t h i t s own m id d le c l a s s . DfZ M e lfo rd E. S p i r o , "The A c c u l t u r a t i o n o f Am erican E th n i c G r o u p s ,” A m erican A n t h r o p o l o g i s t , LVTI (D ecem ber, 1 9 5 5 ), 1243. ^ H e r b e r t H. Hyman, "The V alue System s o f D i f f e r e n t C l a s s e s , ” I n R e in h a r d B e n d ix and Seymour M a rtin L i p s e t , e d s . , C l a s s , S t a t u s and Power, a R e a d e r i n S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n (G le n c o e : F re e P r e s s , 1 9 5 3 ), PP* 526-27- Kluckhohn o b s e rv e s t h a t : Mexican o r i e n t a t i o n s - - i n o u r system s e c u r e v e ry l i t t l e f o r i n d i v i d u a l s e x c e p t a l a c k o f m o b i l i t y and a g e n e r a l l o w e r - c l a s s s t a t u s . I n deed th e o t h e r group i n Am erica w hich has o r i e n t a t i o n s m ost s i m i l a r to th e Mexican i s th e n o n a s p i r i n g , g e n e r a l i z e d l o w e r - c l a s s g ro u p , w hich from th e p o i n t o f view o f th e t o t a l s o c i e t y i s p r i m a r i l y a r e s i d u a l g r o u p . 88 The c u l t u r a l v a lu e o r i e n t a t i o n s r e f e r r e d t o by K luckhohn, o f c o u r s e , a re s p e c i f i c a l l y l o w e r - c l a s s M exican, r a t h e r th a n M exican v a lu e s i n g e n e r a l . T here a r e c e r t a i n a s p e c t s o f th e v a lu e o r i e n t a t i o n o f lo w e r c l a s s M exicans, w hich i f th e y p e r s i s t i n th e U n ited S t a t e s among p e r s o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t would c e r t a i n l y m i l i t a t e a g a i n s t o r a t l e a s t be in c o n g r u e n t w ith th e a c c e p ta n c e o f th e American m id d le - c l a s s v a lu e s n e c e s s a r y f o r s u c c e s s f u l o p e r a t i o n w i t h i n th e American c l a s s sy ste m . The M exican i s s a i d to be o r i e n t e d tow ard p r e s e n t tim e , r a t h e r th a n to w a rd th e f u t u r e as i n th e Am erican m id d le c l a s s , and to be n o t i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c , b u t r a t h e r o r i e n t e d to w ard h i s e x te n d e d f a m ily . S i m i l a r l y h i s te n d e n c y t o be f a t a l i s t i c , and to be a n x io u s to p l a y th e r o l e d e f i n e d f o r him m i l i t a t e a g a i n s t i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c ^ F l o r e n c e Rockwood K luckhohn, " C u l t u r a l F a c t o r s i n S o c i a l Work P r a c t i c e and E d u c a ti o n ," S o c i a l S e r v ic e Review, XXV (March, 1951 )> 44. 45 m o b i l i t y . A l s o p e r t i n e n t a r e th e d i f f e r e n c e s betw een M exicans and Anglos w ith r e g a r d t o a t t i t u d e s tow ard ch ang e, to w a rd work and e f f i c i e n c y , tow ard a c c e p ta n c e and r e s i g n a t i o n , to w a rd d ependency, and to w a rd fo rm al o r g a n i z a t i o n s . I t i s im p o r ta n t to c o n s i d e r t h a t some o f th e s e d i f f e r e n c e s may d e r i v e from th e c u l t u r a l background o f M exico, some from th e M ex ican -A m erican 1s l o w e r - c l a s s p o s i - t i o n , and some from h i s s u b o r d i n a te e t h n i c s t a t u s . O ther f a c t o r s to be c o n s id e r e d i n c l u d e th e s e l e c t i v e a s p e c t s o f m ig r a ti o n and th e f a c t t h a t we a re c o n s i d e r i n g a p o p u la tio n t h a t i s p r i m a r i l y A m erican -b o rn . F u rth e rm o re , as th e im m ig ran t g e n e r a t i o n becomes an I n c r e a s i n g l y s m a ll e r m in o r i t y w i t h i n th e M exican-A m erican g ro u p , i t would seem a p p a r e n t t h a t th e c h a n c e s o f M exican v a lu e s p e r s i s t i n g become i n c r e a s i n g l y s lim . Burma n o t e s t h a t M exican-A m erican c u l t u r e i s a m ix tu r e o f Anglo and Mexican e le m e n ts , and t h a t t h i s t r a n s i t i o n a l c u l t u r e h a s been a v a i l a b l e to im m igrants and to m ig r a n ts from c o l o n i a s e ls e w h e re e v e r s in c e th e ® 9 saun ders, op. c i t . , pp. 117-40. a n n e x a t i o n o f t h e S o u th w e s t t o th e U n ite d S t a t e s i n th e l 8 4 0 f s . 9 ^ W hile l a r g e n u m b e rs o f im m ig r a n ts and t h e i r d e s c e n d a n t s h av e re m a in e d i n t h e c o l o n i a s , l e a d i n g a b i c u l t u r a l l i f e , o t h e r s h a v e become c o m p l e t e l y a c c u l t u r - a t e d , w h i l e t h e i r p l a c e s h a v e b een t a k e n b y more r e c e n t i m m ig r a n ts from M exico. Y e t e v en w i t h i n t h e t r a n s i t i o n a l M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n c u l t u r e , a num ber o f v a r i a n t c u l t u r a l p o s i t i o n s a r e open t o t h e im m ig r a n t and h i s d e s c e n d a n t s , a s t h e M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n com m unity i s t o l e r a n t o f i n d i v i d u a l d i f f e r e n c e s an d e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n . 91 I t s h o u l d be rem em b ered t h a t m o b i l i t y and a c c u l t u r a t i o n a r e i n t e r a c t i o n p r o c e s s e s , t h a t i s , t h e y in v o lv e n o t o n l y m o t i v a t i o n and a c t i o n on t h e p a r t o f t h e p o t e n t i a l l y m o b ile and a c c u l t u r a t e d , b u t a l s o an a c c e p t i n g , f a c i l i t a t i n g a t t i t u d e and a c t i o n on t h e p a r t o f t h e h o s t s o c i e t y . As Simmons n o t e s , "A n glo s t e n d t o r e w a r d i n p r a c t i c e t h o s e M e x lc a n -A m e rie a n s who a re m o s t l i k e them s e l v e s I n i d e a s a n d a c t i o n p a t t e r n s . "92 S i m i l a r l y , S p iro n o t e s t h a t : 9°B urm a, o p . c i t . , p . 124. ^ S c h e r m e r h o m , o p . c i t . , p . 188. ^ 2 Slmmons, op . c i t . , p . 402. 47 The Am erican c l a s s system . . . p r e v e n t s th e m o b i l i t y o f t h e u n a c c u l t u r a t e d , and , s i n c e s o c i a l m o b i l i t y i s a m o tiv e o f param o unt im p o rta n c e , s o c i a l c l a s s r a t h e r th a n e t h n i c community becomes o n e 's r e f e r e n c e g ro u p . But t h i s r e f e r e n c e group can become o n e 's m em bership g ro u p o n ly by a d o p tin g i t s sy m b o ls, t h a t i s , by becom ing a c c u l t u r a t e d . . . . M o b i l i t y a s p i r a t i o n s l e a d to an a c c e l e r a t i o n o f t h e a c c u l t u r a t i v e p r o c e s s . 93 Thus, a s t h e seco n d g e n e r a t i o n i n l a r g e numbers came to m a t u r i t y and e x p e r ie n c e d some o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y c o i n c i d e n t w i t h th e World War I I p e r i o d , th e a c c u l t u r a t i o n p r o c e s s was t h e r e b y g r e a t l y a c c e l e r a t e d , an e f f e c t a t p r e s e n t i n c r e a s i n g l y i n e v id e n c e . The c u l t u r e i n w hich m o b ile M exicans have a s p i r e d t o become a c c u l t u r a t e d i s t h a t o f t h e g e n e r a l i z e d Am erican m id d le c l a s s , o r " c o re c u l t u r e . " Loeb n o t e s t h a t c e n t r a l to t h i s c u l t u r e i s th e s u c c e s s m o t i v e : The h i g h l y e v a l u a t e d v a lu e s o f th e c u l t u r e a re th o s e w hich r e q u i r e th e p u t t i n g o f f o f Im m ediate s a t i s f a c t i o n f o r th e o b t a i n i n g o f f u t u r e g a i n s . . . . E d u c a tio n , o r th e s c h o o l sy ste m , f o r many r e a s o n s , p r o v i d e s th e m a jo r pathw ay f o r s o c i a l m o b i l i t y b e c a u se i t p r o v i d e s th e o p p o r t u n i t y to l e a r n t h e c o re c u l t u r e . 94 ^ S p i r o , l o c . c i t . , p . 1244. ^ M a r t i n B. Loeb, " I m p l i c a t i o n s o f S t a t u s D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n f o r P e r s o n a l and S o c i a l D ev elo pm ent," H arvard E d u c a ti o n a l Review, X X III (Summer, 1 9 5 3 ), 171-72. 48 W r i t e r s on t h e s u b j e c t a r e i n g e n e r a l a g re e m e n t t h a t t h e " s u c c e s s f u l " M e x ic a n s, i . e . t h o s e who have b e e n u p w a rd ly m o b ile a r e t h e m ost e d u c a te d and a c c u l t u r a t e d o n e s . 9 5 >9 6 , 9 1 , 9 8 , 9 9 ,1 0 0 M 0 r e s p e c i f i c a l l y , i n n e a r b y " C i t r u s C i t y , " t h e A nglos b e l i e v e t h a t t h e more " p r o g r e s s i v e " had b e e n a b l e t o r a i s e t h e i r s t a t u s a s M exicans by s p e a k in g E n g l i s h on t h e s t r e e t , m oving o u t o f t h e o l d 'M exican Town' i n t o an a d j a c e n t new t r a c t w i t h s u p e r i o r h o u s i n g , b u t a l s o i n h a b i t e d e x c l u s i v e l y ■by M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n s, 'g o i n g o n ' i n s c h o o l , a t t e n d i n g a P r o t e s t a n t m i s s i o n f o r M exicans r a t h e r t h a n t h e t r a d i t i o n a l C a t h o l i c C h u r c h .101 W hile i t i s c r u c i a l t o c o n s i d e r t h e n e x u s b e tw een e d u c a t i o n and o c c u p a t i o n a l a c h ie v e m e n t, i t m ust n o t be f o r g o t t e n t h a t f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s can o f t e n be ^ B a r k e r , l o c . c i t . 9 ^ C la r k , l o c . c i t . 07 ^ 1 Humphrey, l o c . c i t . 9^Donovan S e n t e r and F l o r e n c e Hawley, "The Grammar S c h o o l a s t h e B a s ic A c c u l t u r a t i n g I n f l u e n c e f o r N a tiv e New M e x ic a n s ," S o c i a l F o r c e s , XXIV (May, 1 9 ^ 6 ) , 298-407 - Q Q ^ S im m o n s , l o c . c i t . 100W atson and Sam ora, l o c . c i t . 101'L a s s w e l l, " S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n a S e l e c t e d Com m unity," p p . 84-85- an i m p o r t a n t in d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e . S t u d i e s i n G re a t B r i t a i n and Sweden a p p e a r t o show " n o t o n ly t h a t h o l d in g f a t h e r ' s s t a t u s c o n s t a n t , e d u c a ti o n w i l l i n f l u e n c e th e s o n 's s t a t u s , b u t a l s o t h a t h o l d in g e d u c a t i o n c o n s t a n t , f a t h e r ' s s t a t u s w i l l be o f c o n s i d e r a b l e i m p o r t a n c e ." 1 0 2 ,1 0 3 C a r ls s o n h a s c o n c e p t u a l i z e d s o c i a l m o b i l i t y a s t a k i n g p l a c e i n two m ain s t e p s : from f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s t o s o n 's e d u c a t i o n a l s t a t u s ( th e p r e - e d u c a t i o n a l s t e p ) , and from th e l a t t e r t o th e s o n ' s o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s ( t h e p o s t - e d u c a t i o n a l s t e p ) . He c o n s i d e r s t h a t w h ile o c c u p a t i o n a l d a t a g iv e us th e end r e s u l t o f th e m o b i l i t y p r o c e s s , e d u c a t i o n a l d a t a i n d i c a t e th e means o f m o b i l i t y .-*-04 On th e o t h e r h an d , e d u c a ti o n may be f a r .from b e in g t h e d o m inant f a c t o r i n f l u e n c i n g m o b i l i t y . As A nderson p o i n t s o u t , " a b i l i t y , w h e th e r h e r e d i t a r y o r n o t , and a s s o c i a t e d m o t i v a t i o n , v a r y in g i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f s c h o o l i n g , p l a y a p o w e r fu l r o l e i n g e n e r a t i n g m o b i l i t y . " 105 R. H a ll and D. V. G l a s s , " E d u c a ti o n a l and S o c i a l M o b i l i t y , " i n D. V. G la s s , e d . , S o c i a l M o b i l i t y i n B r i t a i n (London: R o u tle d g e and Kegan P a u l, 1954)> p . 129. 103 c a r l s s o n , o p . c i t . , p p . 1 2 9- 3 3 . 1Q^ I b i d . , p . 122. -*-05c. A rn o ld A nderson, "A S k e p t i c a l Note on th e R e l a t i o n o f V e r t i c a l M o b i l i t y to E d u c a t i o n , " A m erican J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , LXVI (May, 1 9 6 1 ), 569* N e v e r th e le s s , th e American p u b l i c sc h o o l system has been c i t e d by numerous w r i t e r s as th e s i n g l e most im p o rta n t c h an n el f o r upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y i n t h i s c o u n try , e s p e c i a l l y f o r im m ig ran ts and t h e i r c h i l d r e n . 1 0 6 ,1 0 7 ,1 0 8 Such a s i t u a t i o n i s f a c i l i t a t e d by th e i n c r e a s i n g p r o p o r t i o n o f non-m anual jo b s f o r w hich fo rm al e d u c a tio n i s n eeded . L ip s e t and B endix b e l i e v e t h a t "th e e x p a n sio n o f American e d u c a tio n r e f l e c t s b o th th e n e ed to su p p ly t r a i n e d p e r s o n n e l f o r th e p o s i t i o n s w hich r e q u i r e c o n s id e r a b le edu c a t i o n and th e f a c t t h a t e d u c a ti o n a l re q u ire m e n ts f o r jo b s have been in c re a s e d " -1 -0^ By " e t h n i c m o b il i ty " i s meant th e " p a s s in g " from th e M exican-Am erican e t h n i c group to membership i n th e dom inant, A nglo-Am erican s o c i e t y . Such movement i s g e n e r a l l y c o n s id e r e d , a t l e a s t by Anglos, as upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , and i s o f t e n accom panied by c e r t a i n symbols a ls o c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f upward m o b il i ty . 10^W arner, Meeker and E e ls , op. c i t . , p. 23. 10^K ahl, op. c i t . , p. 2 9 3. 10^Caplow, op. c i t . , p . 79- ■ ^ ^ L ip set and B endix, op. c i t . , p . 189* 51 T h e re a r e s e v e r a l p o s s i b l e a v e n u e s o f e s c a p e up an d o u t o f t h e M e x ic a n s e m i c a s t e p o s i t i o n f o r t h o s e so i n c l i n e d . One i s b y a b s o r p t i o n i n t o t h e A nglo g r o u p , e i t h e r t h r o u g h i n t e r m a r r i a g e ( p a r t i c u l a r l y f o r f e m a l e s , who t h e r e b y l o s e t h e i r t e l l t a l e S p a n i s h s u r n a m e s ) , o r o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y w i t h a n a c c o m p a n y in g r e l u c t a n c e t o a d m it M ex ican a n c e s t r y . Broom a n d S h e v k y n o t e t h a t : T h o s e i n d i v i d u a l s who h a v e a d v a n c e d s u b s t a n t i a l l y , e i t h e r e c o n o m i c a l l y o r i n e d u c a t i o n a l s t a t u s , h a v e t e n d e d t o l o s e t h e i r i d e n t i t y w i t h t h e g r o u p an d h a v e m oved aw ay fro m t h e e t h n i c e n c l a v e s w h ic h a r e e n t i r e l y l o w e r c l a s s . H O One a t t e m p t e d m e th o d o f e t h n i c m o b i l i t y i s t o c a l l o n e s e l f " S p a n i s h " r a t h e r t h a n " M e x i c a n ." T h i s m e th o d h a s b e e n u s e d w i t h o u t s t a n d i n g s u c c e s s i n s o u t h e r n C o lo r a d o a n d n o r t h e r n New M e x ic o , w h e re t h e d e s c e n d a n t s o f t h e o r i g i n a l M e x ica n s e t t l e r s a r e now g e n e r a l l y know n, a t l e a s t b y o u t s i d e r s , a s " S p a n i s h A m e r i c a n s ." A lth o u g h n o t f r e q u e n t l y t h e c a s e i n Pom ona, e l s e w h e r e i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a McDonagh a n d R i c h a r d s s t a t e t h a t M e x ica n h i g h s c h o o l g r a d u a t e s a r e e x p e c t e d t o " a s su m e t h e r o l e o f an A m e ric a n o f S p a n i s h a n c e s t r y . " H I A c c o r d i n g t o t h e s e 110Broom a n d S h e v k y , l o c . c i t . , p . 1 5 4 . ^^-M cD onagh a n d R i c h a r d s , o p . c i t . , p . 1 7 6 . 52 a u t h o r s , t h i s te n d e n cy f o r th e s u c c e s s f u l to d e f i n e th e m s e l v e s a s S p a n i s h "adds s t a t u s to t h e S p a n ish and d e t r a c t s from th e n a t u r a l a b i l i t i e s o f th e I n d i a n a n c e s t r y . 1,112 Thus th e A ng los g e t th e h a b i t o f r e f e r r i n g t o t h e s u c c e s s f u l a s S p a n is h and th o s e n o t so s u c c e s s f u l a s M e x i c a n . N e v e r t h e l e s s , t o some p e r s o n s born i n Mexico o r who t a k e p r i d e i n t r a c i n g t h e i r a n c e s t r y to M exico, t h e term " S p a n is h " may have u n f a v o r a b l e c o n n o t a t i o n s , as i t f r e q u e n t l y d o e s in Mexico i t s e l f . S ch erm erh o rn n o te s t h a t " th e few i n d i v i d u a l s . . . who t r y t o f i t i n w i t h th e Anglo view t h a t th e y a r e 'S p a n i s h ’ a r e r i d i c u l e d among t h e i r own p e o p l e as p r e t e n d e r s . " 11^ But t h i s s i t u a t i o n w ould seem t o be r a p i d l y c h a n g in g , w i t h an i n c r e a s i n g u s e o f t h e term "S p a n ish " by members o f th e se co n d and l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s . T here i s f u r t h e r m o r e , a n o th e r i m p o r t a n t te n d e n c y w h ic h i s to r e g a r d th e te r m s "Mexican" and " S p a n ish " a s synonymous a n d hence t o use them i n t e r c h a n g e a b ly . The r e l a t i o n s h i p b etw een v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l 112I b i d . , p. 1 7 7 - 11^ T a l b e r t , op. c i t . , p. 8. . l l 4 g ch e rm e rh o rn , o p . c i t . , p . 189* m o b i l i t y h a s lo n g b e en n o te d by s o c i o l o g i s t s , i . e . , t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t p e r s o n s moving up t h e s o c i a l l a d d e r w ould a l s o be moving to h i g h e r - s t a t u s r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s .-^ 5 * 1 1 6 ,1 1 7 Simmons n o t e s t h a t : In San A n to n io , t h e num erous a r e a s o f se co n d s e t t l e m e n t ta k e n o v e r by M exican -A m erican s a r e i n d i c a t i v e o f a w id e s p r e a d u r g e , a t l e a s t on th e p a r t o f th e se co n d g e n e r a t i o n to l e a v e th e c o l o n i a and th e d e p r e s s e d c o n d i t i o n s t h a t c h a r a c t e r i z e i t . Most o f t h e s e a r e a s . . . a r e a d j a c e n t t o th e c o l o n i a o r a r e l o c a t e d f a r from t h e b e t t e r Anglo n e ig h b o r h o o d s . I t i s w e ll known t h a t many p e r s o n s u se m em berships i n v o l u n t a r y a s s o c i a t i o n s a s a means o f p ro m o tin g t h e i r own upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y : i n m ost com m u n ities h i g h e r s t a t u s p e r s o n s b e lo n g , on t h e a v e r a g e , to a l a r g e r number o f v o l u n t a r y a s s o c i a t i o n s. They u se v a r i o u s ty p e s o f o r g a n i z a t i o n a l m em berships i n v a l i d a t i n g a d e s i r e d s t a t u s . M exican-A m erican c u l t u r e , h ow ev er, h a s been c h a r a c t e r i z e d ■^■^Caplow, op . c i t . , pp . 6 0 -6 1 . -I 1 zT Broom and Shevky, l o c . c i t . , p . 154. 117 S a u n d e rs , op. c i t . , p . 9 6 . lif t Simmons, op . c i t . , p. 466. Lloyd W arner and P a u l S. L u n t, The S o c i a l L i f e o f a Modern Community (New Haven: Y ale U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 4 1 ), p . 329* 54 by fam ilism : great value placed on having a la rg e and c lo s e ly k n it fam ily, w ith k in sh ip r e la t io n s regarded much more h ig h ly than non-kin r e la tio n s h ip s . Another fa c to r r e la te d to fam ily p a ttern which has_.been w id ely noted as r e la te d to m o b ility i s the overwhelming tendency toward eth n ic endogamy. Mobile persons have been p o stu la te d by various w r ite r s as being more prone to marry Anglo spouses, p o sse ssio n o f such a spouse being regarded as a symbol o f s t a t u s .1 2 0 ,1 2 1 ,1 2 2 T ypologies Inasmuch as the research er was in te r e s te d in con str u c tin g sta tu s and c u ltu r a l ty p o lo g ie s o f the population under study, i t was n ecessary to review the pub lished work on s o c ia l c la s s ty p o lo g ie s and ty p o lo g ie s o f the Mexican- » ■ descent population o f the United S ta te s . l^Norman D. Humphrey, "The Stereotype and the S o c ia l Types o f Mexican American Y outh ," Journal o f S o cia l Psychology, XXII (August, 1 9 4 5) , 6 9 -7 8 . 1 PI Simmons, op. c i t . , p . 4 l4 . 1 2 2 Simpson and Yinger, op. c i t . , p. 55* 55 A lthou gh t h e r e a re some e x c e l l e n t i n d i c e s o f s o c i a l s t a t u s c o n s t r u c t e d by s o c i o l o g i s t s none o f t h e s e 0 a p p e a re d to be a p p r o p r i a t e f o r th e w r i t e r ' s p u r p o s e s . A r e c e n t s tu d y by Kahl and D a v is12^ showed t h a t W a rn e r's "In d e x o f S t a t u s C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s " (which in c l u d e d th e f a c t o r s o f o c c u p a ti o n , r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , ty p e o f r e s i d e n c e , and so u rc e o f incom e) was fo u n d to be th e b e s t m easure b e ca u se o f i t s h ig h c o r r e l a t i o n w ith s i x o t h e r s c a l e s t e s t e d . The w r i t e r u se d th e f i r s t two o f t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , b u t found ty p e o f r e s i d e n c e an i m p r a c t i c a l c r i t e r i on, and th e s t a t u s ra n g e to o n a rro w f o r th e u se o f th e c r i t e r i o n o f incom e. Lawson and Boek found t h a t th e s o c i a l c l a s s r a t i n g s g iv e n by I n t e r v i e w e r s c o r r e l a t e d w e ll w ith th e o t h e r m e a su re s, a lth o u g h income c o r r e l a t e d p o o r l y w ith th em . -^4 W ith r e f e r e n c e to th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n , th e a v a i l a b l e t y p o l o g i e s have been s o c i o c u l t u r a l l y r a t h e r 1 o o Jo se p h A. Kahl and James A. D avis, "A Com pari son o f In d e x e s o f S ocio-E conom ic S t a t u s , " American S o c io lo g i c a l Review, XX (1955 )> 317-25. 1 o il Edwin D. Lawson and W a lte r E. Boek, " C o r r e l a t i o n s o f In d e x e s o f F a m i l i e s ' Socio-E conom ic S t a t u s , " S o c i a l F o r c e s , XXXIX (December, i 9 6 0 ), 149-52 . 56 t h a n c l a s s - o r i e n t e d , s o m e tim e s c o n f u s i n g s e v e r a l t y p e s o f c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a p p r o a c h e s , a n d a r e g e n e r a l l y o u tm o d e d . T h ey a r e o f a g e n e r a l l y d e s c r i p t i v e n a t u r e , a n d few a t t e m p t s , i f a n y , h a v e b e e n made t o q u a n t i f y a n y o f t h e t y p o l o g i e s . S a u n d e r s , f o r e x a m p le , h a s i d e n t i f i e d t h r e e s u b g r o u p s among t h e S p a n i s h - s p e a k i n g o f t h e S o u t h w e s t : t h e S p a n i s h - A m e r i c a n s ( o f New M exico a n d C o l o r a d o ) , t h e M e x i c a n - A m e r i c a n s , a n d t h e M e x i c a n s . He c a l l s "M exi c a n s " t h o s e p e r s o n s l e g a l l y o r i l l e g a l l y i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s on a t e m p o r a r y b a s i s , a n d who e x p e c t t o r e t u r n t o M e x ic o . S a u n d e r s o b s e r v e s t h a t t h e y a r e s u b j e c t t o few p r e s s u r e s t o w a r d a c c u l t u r a t i o n . F o rm e r M e x ic a n s a n d t h e i r d e s c e n d a n t s , who came t o t h i s c o u n t r y l a r g e l y b e tw e e n 19 2 0 a n d t h e 1 9 3 0 's h e c a l l s " M e x l c a n - A m e r l c a n s . " Of t h i s g r o u p h e s a y s t h a t : H a v in g come i n d i v i d u a l l y o r i n s m a l l , i m m e d ia te f a m i l y g r o u p s fro m a b r o a d a r e a i n M exico a n d b e i n g m ore w i d e l y d i s p e r s e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e S o u t h w e s t t h a n t h e S p a n i s h - A m e r i c a n s , t h e M e x ic a n -A ra e r ic a n s h a v e n o t t h e same o p p o r t u n i t y f o r c l o s e c o n t a c t w i t h t h e f a m i l i a r e l e m e n t s o f t h e i r c u l t u r e t h a t t h e S p a n i s h - A m e ric a n s e n j o y a n d , c o n s e q u e n t l y , a r e s u b j e c t e d t o a g r e a t e r d e g r e e t o t h e i m p a c t o f A nglo a c c u l t u r a t - i n g f o r c e s . 126 1 2 ^ S a u n d e r s , o p . c i t . , p p . 4 4 -6 3 * 1 2 ^ I b i d . , p . 5 6 . 57 Thus S a u n d e rs c h a r a c t e r i z e s th e S p a n is h - s p e a k in g p o p u l a t i o n in te rm s o f l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e and a l s o i n term s o f t h e d e g re e t o w hich t h e y a re s u b j e c t to p r e s s u r e s tow ard a c c u l t u r a t i o n . S a u n d e rs does n o t r e c o g n iz e g e n e r a t i o n a l d i f f e r e n c e s as m a jo r t y p o l o g i c a l d i f f e r e n c e s , n o r d o e s he r e c o g n i z e any " o l d s e t t l e r s " o t h e r th a n t h o s e o f C o lo ra d o and New Mexico. McDonagh an d R i c h a r d s , how ever, d i d d i s t i n g u i s h th e " o l d n a t i v e g ro u p " t h a t l i v e d in th e S ou th w est b e f o r e i t became a p a r t o f t h e U n ite d S t a t e s from th e "new n a t i v e group" o f c h i l d r e n o f Mexican Im m ig ra n ts. The o t h e r two g ro u p s w ere c o n s i d e r e d to be t h e "w e tb a c k s" o r i l l e g a l im m ig ra n ts , and th e Mexican n a t i o n a l s , o r c o n t r a c t - l a b o r e r s t e m p o r a r i l y i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s (b r a c e r o s ). T his c l a s s i f i c a t i o n w ould a p p e a r to be b a s e d on t h e f a c t o r s o f r e s i d e n c e ( l e n g t h and p e rm a n e n c e ), n a t i v i t y and l e g a l i t y o f e n t r y , b u t does n o t ta k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h e l a r g e number o f l e g a l im m ig ra n ts . An e a r l i e r c l a s s i f i c a t i o n by B ogardus had d i v i d e d M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s i n t o f i v e c a t e g o r i e s . 127McDonagh and R i c h a r d s , op. c i t . , p . 174. 58 1. N a tiv e b o rn M exicans o f s e v e r a l g e n e r a t i o n s ' s t a n d in g . 2. A r i s t o c r a t i c S p a n ish f a m i l i e s : d e s c e n d a n ts o f f a m i l i e s who w ere l e a d e r s i n th e Southw est i n e a r l y d a y s . 3* S p anish -M ex ican s o f r e c e n t m i g r a t i o n : p e r sons who have f l e d from r e v o l u t i o n . 4. E d u ca te d M exicans who- a r e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f th e c u r r e n t r u l i n g p e o p le o f M exico. 5. U n s k ille d l a b o r e r s who have im m ig ra te d in r e c e n t y e a r s . - ^ 8 B o g a rd u s 1 c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a p p e a rs to ta k e s e v e r a l f a c t o r s i n t o a c c o u n t; n a t i v i t y ( g e n e r a t i o n ) , l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e , s o c i a l c l a s s ( e i t h e r o f p e o p le co n ce rn e d o r o f t h e i r f o r e b e a r s ) , r e a s o n s f o r l e a v in g Mexico, and o c c u p a ti o n . C a te g o r ie s 3 and 4 would a p p e a r n o t to be m u tu a l ly e x c l u s i v e , w h ile c a t e g o r y 2 i g n o r e s th e non- a r i s t o c r a t i c "S p an ish " s e t t l e r s o f t h e e a r l y S o u th w e st. The p r e c e d in g c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s le a v e o u t what i s p e r h a p s th e m ost im p o r ta n t v a r i a b l e o f a l l : d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n to Anglo norm s. In each o f th e ty p e s men t i o n e d t h e r e a r e th o s e g ro u p s and i n d i v i d u a l s who a re 12®Emory S. B ogardus, The M exican in t h e U n ited S t a t e s (Los A n g eles: U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1 9 3 4 ), pp. 9 -1 2 . r e l a t iv e ly more o rien te d toward Mexican cu ltu re than are o th ers. I t should a lso be noted th at use o f the term "Spanish" or "Spanish-Mexican" In the ty p o lo g ie s i s spurious and m islead in g, sin c e the type o f cu ltu re brought from Mexico, reg a rd less o f the r a c ia l e x tr a c tio n o f the in d iv id u a ls or fa m ilie s bringing i t i s Mexican c u ltu r e , not s t r i c t l y Spanish as such. Of course, Mexican cu ltu re i s h e a v ily indebted to Spanish c u ltu r e , and Mexican cu ltu re i s very h eterogeneous, in fa c t may be sa id to e x i s t in a v a r ie ty o f su b cu ltu res, none o f which, however, properly can be denominated as "Spanish." Too o fte n the term "Spanish" has been used, both by s o c io lo g ic a l w r ite r s and E nglish and Spanish-speaking people in general to d i s tin g u ish "high-type" from "low-type" s tr a ta . This i s as erroneous in the United S ta te s as i t would be in Mexico I t s e l f . Another drawback to th ese ty p o lo g ie s i s th at they are s t a t i c . They are not regarded as rep resen tin g the r e s u lt o f the e f f e c t s o f a c c u ltu r a tio n a l p ro cesses op era t ing w ith in the framework o f h is to r y . Too o ften h is to r y Is regarded as something that happened some time ago, once and fo r a l l . Present s o c io c u ltu r a l co n d itio n s are the outcome 6o o f h i s t o r i c a l f o r c e s t h a t o p e r a t e d In th e p a s t and down t o th e p r e s e n t c o n ti n u e t o . o p e r a t e . The w r i t e r ' s c o n te n t i o n I s t h a t th e ty p o lo g y o f M exicans I n th e U n ite d S t a t e s n e e d s t o be c a s t i n a h i s t o r i c a l fram ew ork. The h i s t o r i c i t y o f any s o c i o l o g i c a l s t a t e m e n t s made a b o u t U n ite d S t a t e s M exicans n e e d s to be r e c o g n i z e d . T here i s e x t a n t a volu m inou s l i t e r a t u r e on th e v a r i o u s t y p e s o f M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n s . W ith r e f e r e n c e t o th e " o l d - s e t t l e r " p o p u l a t i o n , p e r h a p s th e b e s t known o f t h e i r d e s c e n d a n ts a r e th e "H isp a n o s" (who o f t e n c a l l th e m s e lv e s " m a n ito s" o r " m e j i c a n o s " ), d e s c e n d a n t s o f t h e o r i g i n a l r a c i a l l y m ixed E u ro p e a n iz e d s e t t l e r s o f New Mexico and s o u t h e r n C o lo rad o when t h i s a r e a was u n d e r S p a n is h r u l e , b u t a d m i n i s t e r e d and c o l o n i z e d from M exico. U n t i l r e c e n t l y m ost o f t h e H isp a n o s l i v e d i n I s o l a t e d r u r a l a r e a s and w ere e c o n o m ic a lly and s o c i a l l y h a n d i c a p p e d . I n r e c e n t y e a r s th e y have become i n c r e a s i n g l y u r b a n i z e d a s many h av e b e e n f o r c e d o f f t h e i r l a n d s . Many H isp a n o s l e f t New Mexico and C o lo rad o d u rin g •'-‘^ G e o r g e I . S anchez, The F o r g o t t e n P eo p le (A lb u q u e rq u e : U n i v e r s i t y o f New Mexico P r e s s , 1 9 ^ 0 ), p . 27. 61 t h e W o rld War I I and p o s t - w a r p e r i o d s . Some came t o S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a , a n d a s i z e a b l e num b er a r e t o be f o u n d i n Pomona a n d n e a r b y c o m m u n itie s . I n T e x a s t h e d e s c e n d a n t s o f t h o s e M e x ic a n s who w e re i n T e x a s b e f o r e i t was s e p a r a t e d from M exico a r e known a s " T e x a s M e x i c a n s ." They e s t a b l i s h e d c o l o n i a s t o w h ic h l a t e r I m m i g r a n t s h a v e come a n d w h e re t h e y " a c c u l - t u r a t e d t o t h e p e c u l i a r T e x a s - M e x ic a n v a r i e t y o f M ex ican c u l t u r e a s m o d i f i e d b y Anglo c u l t u r e r a t h e r t h a n d i r e c t l y t o t h e l a t t e r . "130 E ven th o u g h some o f t h e s e p e o p l e can t r a c e t h e i r f a m i l y r e s i d e n c e I n T e x a s f o r s i x g e n e r a t i o n s , t h e y a r e p r o u d o f b e i n g M e x ic a n s . ^ 1 T h i s c a n be c o n t r a s t e d w i t h t h e a t t i t u d e o f l a r g e n u m b e rs o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a M e x ic a n s , who r e f e r t o t h e m s e l v e s a s " S p a n i s h . " I n t h e Pomona a r e a t h e o r i g i n a l M exican s e t t l e r s i n t e r m a r r i e d w i t h t h o s e who came from M exico a t a l a t e r d a t e , b e g i n n i n g p a r t i c u l a r l y I n t h e 1 8 8 0 's . The p r o d u c t s o f t h e s e i n t e r m a r r i a g e s , who b e g a n t o c a l l t h e m s e l v e s 1 3°sim m 0n s , o p . c l t . , p . 519* 1 3I i b i d . , p . 5 2 1 . 62 " S p a n is h ," m a rr ie d n o t o n ly eac h o t h e r , but a l s o th o s e who im m ig rated from Mexico d u rin g th e f i r s t two d ecades o f t h i s c e n t u r y . Most o f t h e l i t e r a t u r e w hich d e a l s w ith " th e M exi can i n t h e U n ited S t a t e s " d e a ls w ith th e problem s o f Mexican im m ig ra n ts and t h e i r c h i l d r e n , and em phasize th e d e t r i m e n t a l e f f e c t s o f , on th e one hand, c o n tin u e d a d h e r ence to Mexican c u l t u r a l s t a n d a r d s , and on th e o t h e r hand, n o n a c c e p ta n c e by th e g e n e r a l Anglo p o p u l a t i o n . In t h i s c a s e h i s t o r i c a l d e p th I s m inim al and th e c r u c i a l f a c t o r i s d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n . The one m a jo r ty p e n o t c o v e re d In th e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h i s t h a t o f th e te m p o ra ry r e s i d e n t s . There a r e , f o r exam ple, s t u d e n t s a t t e n d i n g American s c h o o ls and c o l l e g e s . -*-32 T here a re t o u r i s t s and p e rs o n s h e re te m p o ra r i l y on b u s i n e s s . More I m p o r t a n t l y , t h e r e a re th e w o rk ers Im p o rte d u n d e r c o n t r a c t f o r l i m i t e d p e r i o d s o f a g r i c u l t u r a l work, th e b r a c e r o s . These gro u p s a re o f o n ly p e r i p h e r a l i n t e r e s t to t h i s s tu d y Inasm uch a s t h e r e i s no way to n o ^ R alph L. B e als and Norman D. Humphrey, No F r o n t i e r t o L e a rn in g (M in n e a p o lis : U n i v e r s i ty o f M in nesota P r e s s , 1957)* i d e n t i f y th e w etbacks, i f any, i n Pomona, and t h e r e a re no b r a c e r o camps in t h e c i t y . N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e r e a r e u n d o u b te d ly fo rm er members o f t h e s e groups i n Pomona, d e s p i t e th e v i g i l a n t e f f o r t s o f t h e l o c a l im m ig ra tio n s e r v i c e . McWilliams e s t i m a t e s t h a t p e rh a p s 80 p e r c e n t o f a l l M exican im m igrants i n C a l i f o r n i a o r i g i n a l l y e n te r e d i l l e g a l l y . -*-33 ■^^Carey M cW illiam s, F a c t o r i e s i n t h e P ie Id (B o sto n : L i t t l e , Brown and Co., 1939)> P* 125- CHAPTER I I I THE METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN In tr o d u c tio n There are th r ee p r in c ip a l approaches to th e study o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n in a p a r t ic u la r com m unity.1 One approach c o n s i s t s o f a s e l f - c l a s s i f i c a t i o n p r o c e ss whereby community members are asked to e s tim a te t h e i r own p la c e s in the c l a s s s t r u c t u r e . Another approach o b ser v es the d is t r ib u t io n in th e p o p u la tio n o f c e r t a in v a r ia b le s ( e . g . , o c c u p a tio n , e d u c a tio n , incom e) purported to be in d ic e s o f th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e . In a t h ir d approach, based on th e r e p u ta tio n o f in d iv id u a ls , resp o n d en ts are asked to c l a s s i f y one an oth er in to c a t e g o r ie s and to d e s c r ib e the s t r a t i f i c a t i o n system o f t h e ir community. Lundberg and h is c o lle a g u e s n o te t h a t: ■^George A. Lundberg, C larence C. Shrag and Otto N. Larsen, S o c io lo g y (Rev. e d .; New York: Harper & B r o s ., 1 9 5 8 ) , p. 4 8 9 . 64 65 Each o f th ese approaches i s 'o b j e c t iv e 1 to the ex ten t th at the r u le s and procedures o f the s c ie n t i f i c method are fo llo w ed . . . . S o c io lo g is ts . . . o fte n fin d th a t the d iffe r e n t methods d es crib e approxim ately the same s t r u c t u r e .2 The w riter has attem pted to use a l l three methods, at le a s t in p a rt. I t should be emphasized that the presen t study i s p rim arily em p irical and d e s c r ip tiv e . I t sum m arizes the w r ite r 's search o f the lit e r a t u r e , the r e s u lts o f in terv iew in g an area sample o f Pomona's Mexican- Americans, and h is o b serv a tio n s o f the community. Planning Stage The main problems in the planning o f the f i e l d research centered around the q u estio n s to be asked, th e ir wording and sequence, and sample d esign . A schedule of q u estio n s to be asked in the in te rv ie w was developed in an e f f o r t to ob tain the data needed fo r the t e s t in g o f the hypotheses, and fo r gatherin g o f oth er inform ation fo r d e s c r ip tiv e purposes. Both E n glish and Spanish-language v er sio n s were prepared. The in te rv ie w schedule was then p r e te ste d by in te rv ie w in g a random sample o f f i f t e e n per sons, s e le c te d from the c i t y d ir e c to r y , in the c i t i e s o f 2Ibid. 66 Claremont, M on tclair, La Verne and San Dimas, a l l o f which ad join Pomona. As a r e s u lt o f the p r e t e s t ex p erien ce, the o r ig in a l d ra ft o f the in te r v ie w schedule was r e v ise d and w r itte n in i t s d e f i n i t i v e form. (See Appendixes A and B . ) Because lo c a tio n o f r e sid en ce was a v a ria b le in some o f the w r it e r ’ s hypotheses and in the sampling method, i t was n ece ssa r y to id e n t if y and d e lin e a te the areas in which the Mexicans o f Pomona r e s id e (See Figure l ) . A v a r ie ty o f c r i t e r i a , both o b je c tiv e and s u b je c tiv e , were taken in to account in doing t h i s . Some o f the areas have names or w e ll-d e fin e d boundaries; in oth er ca ses areas are bounded by n atu ral or man-made b a r r ie r s , by planning zones, by the c i t y l i m i t s , or by recogn ized a r t e r i a l s . The two most im portant o f th e se a r t e r i a l s are Garey Avenue and H olt Avenue which in t e r s e c t to d iv id e the c i t y in to the g e n e r a lly recogn ized four major areas o f Pomona: n o rth e a st, n orthw est, so u th e a st, southw est. The o ld er part o f the c i t y l i e s fo r the most p art a few b lock s both north and south o f Holt Avenue. T r a d itio n a lly , the Mexicans have re sid ed in the area south o f Holt ( e s p e c ia lly west o f Garey), but have moved in s iz e a b le numbers to the o ld er area north o f H olt. With the b u ild in g o f new housing in L in c o ln Ave 1 1 th S t L e x in g to n S t FIGURE 1 RESIDENTIAL AREAS OF PO M O N A S a n Antonio Ave. 68 the areas north, south and west o f the o ld er part o f town, Mexicans have taken up resid en ce In th ese areas as w e ll, p a r tic u la r ly In the neighborhoods adjacent to the o r ig in a l areas o f con cen tration . Approximately tw o-th ird s o f Pomona's Mexican population l i v e in the southwestern se c to r . The other th ir d i s f a i r l y w ell d is tr ib u te d over the remaining area o f the c i t y . There i s no major area of the c i t y where persons o f Mexican descent do not re sid e although they are more concentrated in some neighborhood areas than in o th e rs. Conferences were h eld w ith lo c a l r e a lto r s and w ith c i t y o f f i c i a l s to obtain a consensus o f s o c ia l evalu ation o f areas. Real e s ta te advertisem ents were stu d ied w ith referen ce to the s e l l i n g p ric e o f houses in d iffe r e n t areas. Centers o f con cen tration o f the Mexican population were determined by p lo tt in g on a map o f the c i t y a dot for every Spanish-surname household l i s t e d in the Pomona c i t y d ire cto ry . Several days were spent d riv in g down v ir t u a lly every s tr e e t in Pomona looking p rim arily fo r sharp changes in type o f housing from one block or neighborhood to 6 9 a n o t h e r . The f i n a l outcom e was t h e d e l i n e a t i o n o f s i x t e e n r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s i n t h e s o u t h w e s t , and tw e lv e a r e a s i n t h e r e m a in d e r o f t h e c i t y . A reas l a t e r w ere com bined f o r p u r p o s e s o f a n a l y s i s when i n t e r a r e a l d i f f e r e n c e s p ro v e d t o be t r i v i a l , o r i f t h e num ber o f M exican i n h a b i t a n t s was to o s m a ll f o r sa m p lin g p u r p o s e s . The t w e n t y - e i g h t o r i g i n a l a r e a s w ere com bined i n t o se v en hom ogeneous a r e a s on t h e b a s i s o f t h e i n t e r v i e w r e s u l t s ( s e e F ig u r e 1 ) . B ased on t h e p r o c e d u r e s d i s c u s s e d a b o v e , a r e a s w ere c l a s s i f i e d as f o l l o w s : E x c l u s i v e (no M exican s r e s i d e d i n t h i s a r e a ) ; Most D e s i r a b l e (A); Very Good (B ); F a i r (C ); Poor (D ); Bad (E ). The o b v io u s p r e j u d i c e s o f r e a l t o r s ' g i v i n g p o o r r a t i n g s t o a r e a s w i t h h i g h c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f m i n o r i t y g ro u p m em bers, i n c l u d i n g M e x ica n s, d i d n o t i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e w r i t e r ' s a t t e m p t o b j e c t i v e l y to e v a l u a t e h o u s in g and n e ig h b o r h o o d c o n d i t i o n s . The w r i t e r ' s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s a g r e e s v e ry c l o s e l y w i t h th e much more d e t a i l e d s u r v e y o f Pomona h o u s in g c o n d i t i o n s c a r r i e d o u t one y e a r l a t e r b y A s h l e y . 3 3 -^Thomas J . A s h le y , A R e p o rt t o t h e C o u n c il o f th e C i ty o f Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a on t h e Q u a l i t y o f H ousing i n t h e C i t y o f Pomona (Pomona, 1 9 6 1 ). 70 There are se rio u s d i f f i c u l t i e s in volved in any sampling o f a p opu lation o f persons o f Mexican d escen t, p a r tic u la r ly i f a complete coverage o f the p op u lation on a random b a sis i s d e sir e d . Even i f census data had been a v a ila b le , a m u ltista g e area sample would have been out o f the q u estion u n le ss a l l Mexicans were to l i v e in a s in g le area or group o f areas; such i s not the case in Pomona. The b a sic problem was how to be able to lo c a te a l l Mexican households or persons so that e lim in a tio n o f persons would not produce a s y s te m a tic a lly b ia sed sample. I d e n tif ic a t io n o f the Mexican-American Population The p opu lation stud ied by the research er c o n siste d o f a l l a d u lts o f Mexican d escent r e sid in g in the c i t y o f Pomona. D e fin itio n o f t h is problem c o n s titu t e s an academic and p r a c t ic a l problem o f con sid erab le p rop ortion s. The research er f o u n d i t n ecessa ry to d ev ise an a rb itra r y d e f in it io n fo r the purposes o f h is research . "Persons o f Mexican descent" were con sidered to be a l l Spanish-surname persons r e sid e n t in Pomona who were born in Mexico or whose foreb ears were born in Mexico. Not a l l foreb ears on both maternal and p atern al sid e s needed to have been born in 71 M exico. P e rs o n s o f m ixed d e s c e n t w ere i n c l u d e d w i t h i n th e d e f i n i t i o n , p r o v id e d t h a t e i t h e r ( l ) t h e y i d e n t i f i e d th em s e l v e s w i t h th e Mexican community o r n a t i o n a l i t y , o r (2) t h e y w ere r e a r e d i n a S p a n is h - s p e a k in g f a m i ly o r n e i g h b o r hood m ost o f th e members o f w hich w ould o th e r w is e f a l l i n t o th e d e f i n e d p o p u l a t i o n . The a c t u a l o p e r a t i o n s in v o lv e d i n i d e n t i f y i n g i n d i v i d u a l s i n th e p o p u l a t i o n a r e i n c l u d e d i n th e d i s c u s s i o n on sa m p lin g below . F o r p u r p o s e s o f b r e v i t y , a l t h o u g h t h e y r e p r e s e n t i n a c c u r a t e u s a g e , th e te rm s "M exican" o r "M exican-A m eri can" have been s u b s t i t u t e d f o r th e more cumbersome " p e r s o n o f M exican d e s c e n t" i n t h i s s tu d y . The te r m in o lo g y u s e d i n i d e n t i f y i n g M exicans by b o th M exicans and o t h e r s i s f r e q u e n t l y c o n f u s in g . T h ere a p p e a rs t o be a te n d e n c y f o r b o th g r o u p s i n c r e a s i n g l y t o u se some te rm o t h e r th a n "M e x ic a n ." In S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a t h e t r e n d i s to w a rd t h e u se o f " S p a n is h " ; i n T exas i t i s to w a rd t h e use o f " L a t i n A m e ric an ." And w h ile some ( th e H is p a n o s , f o r exam ple) r e s e n t t h e u se o f th e term "M exican" by o u t s i d e r s , t h e y may c o n t i n u e to use i t among t h e m s e l v e s .^ These t e n d e n c i e s ^Jam es B. W atson and J u l i a n Sam ora, " S u b o r d in a te L e a d e r s h ip i n a B i c u l t u r a l Community," Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , XXIX (A u gust, 1 9 5 4 )> 4 1 3 -2 1 . 72 are r e in fo r c e d by the Anglo tendency to d efin e as "Spanish" and th e r e fo r e as " h ig h -ty p e ," th ose Mexican-Americans most c l o s e ly approaching Anglo c u ltu r a l and p h y sic a l ch a ra c te r i s t i c s . ^ In an e f f o r t to a s c e r t a i n e t h n i c s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h e w r i t e r a sk ed e a c h r e s p o n d e n t i n h i s sam ple th e q u e s t i o n , "When p e o p le a sk you 'What i s y o u r n a t i o n a l i t y ? 1 w hat do you u s u a l l y a n sw e r?" As m ig h t be e x p e c te d , th e overw helm ing m a j o r i t y (118 o r 8 0 .3 p e r c e n t ) s a i d "Mexi c a n ," " o f M exican d e s c e n t , " "M exican-A m erican" o r u s e d some s i m i l a r te rm . A s i z e a b l e m i n o r i t y (24 o r 1 6 .3 p e r c e n t ) , how ever, s a i d " S p a n ish " o r " S p a n is h - A m e ric a n " ; 3 r e s p o n d e n t s s a i d t h e y w ere I n d i a n s . I n a l l c a s e s , how ever, th e H is p a n ic e t h n i c and l i n g u i s t i c h e r i t a g e had been d e r i v e d from M exico. Only one p e r s o n i n t e r v i e w e d i n S p a n is h s a i d he was a n y th in g o t h e r t h a n M exican. Of the 24 in d iv id u a ls id e n t ify in g them selves as Spanish, Spanish-American or o f Spanish d escen t, 4 were Hispanos and 8 were members o f "old C a lifo r n ia fa m ilie s" ^Ozzie Simmons, "Americans and Mexican-Americans in South Texas" (unpublished Ph.D. d is s e r t a t io n , Harvard U n iv e r sity , 1 9 5 2 ), p. 173* 73 o r a t l e a s t th e y b o re t h e name o f an o ld C a l i f o r n i a f a m i ly . At l e a s t h a l f o f t h e i r f o r e b e a r s were o l d C a l i f o r n i a n s , a lth o u g h some o f t h e s e r e s p o n d e n ts had one p a r e n t born i n M exico. Thus, o n ly h a l f o f th e s e p e o p le c o u ld claim any d i s t i n c t i o n o f b e lo n g in g to an " o ld S p a n ish f a m i ly ." Sam pling The m ech an ics o f sam plin g i n th e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h w ere as f o l lo w s . The names o f a l l p e rs o n s w ith S p a n ish surnam es l i s t e d i n th e c i t y d i r e c t o r y as l i v i n g i n Pomona, t o g e t h e r w ith t h e i r a d d r e s s e s and o t h e r i n f o r m a ti o n i n c l u d ed , were c o p ie d on t o 3 x 5 c a r d s , one c a r d f o r each p e r s o n o r m a r r i e d c o u p le l i s t e d . The d i r e c t o r y l i s t s o n ly a d u l t s and i s s a i d by th e p u b l i s h e r to be more th a n 99 p e r c e n t c o m p l e t e . 6 U n f o r t u n a t e ly th e sam ple c o u ld n o t c o n ta in p e r so n s who had moved to Pomona s in c e t h e d i r e c t o r y was com p iled . The so u rc e u se d f o r th e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f w h e th e r a surname was S p a n ish was th e mim eographed l i s t o f 5.* 000 ^ P e r s o n a l com m unication from J . R. L uskey, P r e s i d e n t , Luskey B r o t h e r s ' C o ., I n c . , p u b l i s h e r s o f th e d i r e c t o r y , d a te d Septem ber 6, i 9 6 0 . 74 7 common Spanish surnames used by the Bureau o f the Census. The l i s t p resen ts many d i f f i c u l t i e s o f use, in th at i t l i s t s some surnames which only ra rely are Spanish (e.g., Weyler or Chen) but which are u su a lly o f some other n a tio n a l o r ig in . Sim ilarly there are common surnames which can be o f other n a t io n a lit ie s , e.g., S ilv a , which can be Portuguese or I ta lia n as w ell as Spanish. L ike w ise, there are many other surnames, fa r from being rare, which are not included; the w r it e r 's , for in sta n ce. The Bureau o f the Census l i s t was adhered to , except th a t the few surnames l i s t e d but known by the researcher to be d e f in it e ly not Spanish were elim in a ted . Furthermore, sur names in the c i t y d irectory, but which were not on the Census Bureau l i s t , were tran scribed on to the cards i f e ith e r ( l ) the w riter knew them to be Spanish surnames, or (2) they were variant or erroneous s p e llin g s of names on the lis t. According to Winnie the use o f su b jectiv e judgments in Spanish surname c l a s s if ic a t io n provides much more r e lia b le data than re ly in g on the l i s t in a p urely 7 U. S. Bureau o f the Census, Common Spanish Sur names, Vol. IV, Pt. I l l , General Coding, Attachment H; n .p ., n.d. 75 Q m e c h a n ic a l f a s h i o n . The surnam es o f 12 r e s p o n d e n ts i n t h e w r i t e r ’ s sam ple w ere S p a n ish b u t n o t on th e Census l i s t . A t o t a l o f 2 ,4 4 6 names o f Pomona S p a n ish -su rn a m e p e rs o n s was l i s t e d . 9 The c a rd s w ere th e n s o r t e d and g ro u p ed by r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a . W ith in e a c h r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , th e p e r s o n s r e s i d e n t t h e r e were f i r s t a r r a n g e d by a d d r e s s ; e a c h p e rs o n was a s s ig n e d a number i n c o n s e c u tiv e s e r i a l o r d e r . Using a t a b l e o f random num bers10 a 6 p e r c e n t sam ple was drawn from e a c h r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a . In a d d i t i o n , a few e x t r a names were drawn from eac h a r e a to be h e l d i n r e s e r v e i n t h e e v e n t o f an i n a b i l i t y to o b t a i n an i n t e r v i e w w ith a sam ple member. As t h e s e names were s e l e c t e d , th e y w ere l a b e l e d " A l t e r n a t e # 1 ," " A lte r n a te # 2 ," ^ W illiam W . W innie, J r . , "The S p a n is h Surname C r i t e r i o n f o r I d e n t i f y i n g H ispan os i n t h e S o u th w e ste rn U n ited S t a t e s , " S o c i a l F o r c e s , XXXVIII (May, i 9 6 0 ) , 366. ^ T h is com pares w i t h th e e s t i m a t e o f 2,9 4 3 a d u l t s o b t a i n e d b y th e I960 c e n s u s th r o u g h a 25 p e r c e n t sam ple o f S p an ish -S u rn am e p e r s o n s : U. S. B ureau o f t h e C ensus, U. S . Census o f P o p u la tio n and H ousing: I9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s , Los A ngeles-L ong Beach, C a l i f . , S ta n d a r d M e t r o p o li t a n S t a t i s t i c a l Area (W ash ing ton , D. C . : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1 9 5 2 ), p . 60 6 . 10Rand C o r p o r a t i o n , A M i l l i o n Random D i g i t s , w ith 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 Normal D e v ia te s (G len co e: F re e P r e s s , 1955)* 76 e t c . I f i t was n o t p o s s i b l e t o i n t e r v i e w a p e rs o n i n t h e o r i g i n a l sam ple drawn from a g iv e n r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , an a tt e m p t was made to c o n t a c t t h e p e r s o n d e s i g n a t e d a s a l t e r n a t i v e # 1 ; i f more th a n one a d d i t i o n a l name was needed, a l t e r n a t i v e s w ere c o n t a c t e d i n n u m e r ic a l o r d e r . F i e l d P r o c e d u r e s An a t t e m p t was made to i n t e r v i e w e v e r y p e r s o n i n t h e sam ple; t h e o n ly r e a s o n s f o r n o t making an i n t e r v i e w w ere ( l ) p e r s o n was n o t o f M exican d e s c e n t ; (2) p e r s o n r e f u s e d t o be i n t e r v i e w e d ; ( 3 ) p e r s o n h ad moved and e i t h e r c o u ld n o t be l o c a t e d o r had moved to o f a r f o r i t t o be p r a c t i c a l to c o n t a c t him ; (4 ) p e r s o n was d e c e a s e d . O t h e r w i s e , i n e v e r y c a s e , t h e p e r s o n was i n t e r v i e w e d . R e p e a te d c a l l b a c k s w ere made u n t i l e i t h e r t h e p e rs o n was i n t e r v iew ed o r a r e f u s a l made. Of a l l i n t e r v i e w s 5 6 .4 p e r c e n t w ere c o m p le te d w ith t h e f i r s t v i s i t , 2 7 .2 p e r c e n t were c o m p le te d w i t h th e se co n d v i s i t , and 1 0 .2 p e r c e n t w i t h th e t h i r d ; o n ly 1 6 .4 p e r c e n t o f t h e i n t e r v i e w s in v o lv e d more th a n two c a l l b a c k s . The l a r g e s t number o f c a l l b a c k s made was se v e n . I n t e r v i e w i n g was begun i n O c to b e r, i 960 and was c o m p le te d i n A u g u st, 1 9 6 1 . 77 A f t e r th e p r o s p e c t i v e in f o r m a n t had been l o c a t e d , th e w r i t e r in tr o d u c e d h i m s e l f , b r i e f l y e x p la in e d th e p u r pose o f h i s r e s e a r c h , and r e q u e s t e d th e p r i v i l e g e o f an i n t e r v i e w . I t was e x p la in e d t h a t t h e p e rs o n had been s e l e c t e d a t random, and t h a t a l l in f o r m a ti o n d iv u lg e d would be k e p t i n th e s t r i c t e s t c o n fid e n c e , a l s o t h a t he m ig h t be n e i t h e r a b le n o r w i l l i n g to answ er a l l th e q u e s t i o n s , b u t t h a t i t was n o t im p o r ta n t i f such o c c u r r e d . The w r i t e r a tte m p te d to a s c e r t a i n i n w hich la n g u a g e th e re s p o n d e n t w ished to have th e i n t e r v i e w c o n d u c te d . Younger p e r s o n s w ere ap p ro a ch e d i n E n g li s h , and i n v i r t u a l l y a l l c a s e s t h i s p ro v e d to be th e p r e f e r r e d la n g u a g e ; i n th e c a se o f e l d e r l y p e r s o n s , th e r e v e r s e s i t u a t i o n p r e v a i l e d . Where t h e r e was d o u b t, p a r t i c u l a r l y I f th e p r o s p e c t spoke h e a v i l y a c c e n t e d E n g li s h , th e w r i t e r a sk ed "Do you w ish me to a sk th e q u e s t i o n s i n S p a n ish o r E n g lis h ? " In c a se th e p e rs o n s a i d i n e f f e c t " I t makes no d i f f e r e n c e , " th e la n g u a g e I n w hich th e w r i t e r and i n te r v ie w e e had been c o n v e r s in g was c o n tin u e d . Of th e t o t a l number o f i n t e r v i e w s 104 o r 7 0 .7 p e r c e n t were c o n d u c te d i n E n g li s h , and 43 o r 29*3 p e r c e n t i n S p a n is h . The r e l a t i v e l y s m a ll number o f p e r s o n s p r e f e r r i n g S p a n ish were e i t h e r p e r s o n s who spoke l i t t l e o r no E n g lis h o r who spoke f l u e n t E n g lis h , b u t p r e f e r r e d to speak S p a n ish w ith S p a n is h - s p e a k in g p e r s o n s . A lthough th e w r i t e r h a s no way to s u b s t a n t i a t e t h i s c o n c l u s i o n , i t i s h i s o p in io n t h a t more s a t i s f a c t o r y answ ers were o b t a i n e d i n E n g lis h th a n i n S p a n is h . T h is o p in io n may have r e s u l t e d b e c a u se n o n - s p e a k e r s o r p o o r s p e a k e r s o f E n g li s h w ere on th e a v e ra g e l e s s w e ll e d u c a te d . S i m i l a r l y , i t would a p p e a r t h a t even f o r p e rs o n s whose command o f E n g li s h i s i n a d e q u a te , t h e i r c u l t u r a l e x p e r ie n c e i n th e American e n v i r o n ment h as b een b r o a d e r and r i c h e r t h a n t h e i r e x p e r ie n c e o f M exican c u l t u r e . U s u a lly t h e i r l e a r n e d and s e m i- l e a r n e d v o c a b u la r y i s g r e a t e r i n E n g li s h th a n i t i s i n S p a n ish , p e rh a p s even t h a t o f s p e a k e r s o f p o o r E n g lis h . T h e ir S p a n ish v o c a b u la r y i s more l i k e l y t h a n n o t to r e f e r to a r u r a l type o f c u l t u r e , w h ereas th e q u e s t i o n s o f th e i n t e r view s c h e d u le p e r t a i n m a in ly to an u rb an e n v iro n m e n t. A nother p o s s i b l e f a c t o r may have been th e g r e a t e r s t a t u s d i f f e r e n t i a l betw een th e w r i t e r and th e S p a n is h - s p e a k in g r e s p o n d e n ts t h a n betw een th e w r i t e r and th e E n g li s h - s p e a k in g r e s p o n d e n t s . L en sk i and L e g g e tt n o te t h a t : R e se a rc h h as made i t c l e a r t h a t th e b e h a v io r o f r e s p o n d e n ts i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t e d by th e 79 r e la t iv e p o s itio n s o f respondent and in te r v ie w e r in the c a ste and c la s s system s o f s o c ie t y . . . . When in te rv ie w s in v o lv e communication between the c la s s e s or between th e c a s te s , an elem ent o f r e tic e n c e becomes e v i d e n t .H In order to secure the 6 per cen t sample o f 147 c a s e s, i t was necessary to co n tact a t o t a l o f 210 p erso n s. Use o f the 63 a lte r n a te s was made n ecessary by th e fa c t th a t 17 p ersons refu sed , 3 were d eceased, 26 were not lo c a te d , and 17 were not o f Mexican d escen t. Each o f two o f th e se c a te g o r ie s , the r e f u s a ls and the n o n -lo ca ted persons r e p r e se n ts a source o f p o s s ib le b ia s . I t was found th a t th ere was u n d errep resen tation o f the fo llo w in g types o f p erso n s: s e m i-s k ille d workers, married p erso n s, persons r e n tin g t h e ir p lace o f r e s id e n c e , and persons who spent r e l a t i v e l y le s s time in a given r e sid e n c e . The sample was a lso u n d errep resen ta tiv e of Mexicans w ith non-Spanish surnames and o f persons who had most r e c e n tly moved Into Pomona. The o n ly f a c t o r s , how ever, fo r which s t a t i s t i c a l s ig n if ic a n c e could be claim ed are home ownership and r e s id e n t i a l s t a b i l i t y . ■^Gerhard E. Lenski and John C. L egget, "Caste, C la ss, and Deference In th e Research I n te r v ie w ," American Journal o f S o c io lo g y , LXV (March, i 9 6 0 ), 463* 80 P erso n s who r e n t e d t h e i r l i v i n g q u a r t e r s w ere u n d e r r e p r e s e n te d i n th e sample as compared w ith home ow ners. While 15 o r 6 0 .0 p e r c e n t o f n o n - lo c a te d m overs were r e n t e r s , o n ly 40 o r 27.4 p e r cen t o f th e sample p e rs o n s were r e n t e r s . Chi sq u a re f o r t h i s d i f f e r e n c e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . P erso n s who moved away and were n o t l o c a t e d a l s o a p p e a re d to be l e s s s t a b l e , as m ig ht be e x p e c te d o f a group p r i m a r i l y made up o f r e n t e r s . While 14 o r 87-5 p e r c e n t o f th e movers f o r which t h e r e were d a ta had l i v e d l e s s th a n 6 y e a rs a t th e a d d re ss l i s t e d i n th e c i t y d i r e c - t o r y , o n ly 82 o r 5 5 -8 p e r c en t o f th e w r i t e r ' s sample were i n t h i s c a t e g o r y . The c h i sq u a re f o r t h i s d i f f e r e n c e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . Thus th e w r i t e r ' s sample i s b i a s e d i n th e d i r e c t i o n of t h e more s t a b l e e le m e n ts in th e M exican-A m erican community. The w r i t e r ' s 6 p e r c e n t sample o f S panish -su rn am e a d u l t s in Pomona may a ls o be compared w ith th e a d u l t s in th e Census B u re a u 's 25 p e r c e n t sample o f S p an ish -su rn am e p e rs o n s in Pomona. I t w i l l be n o te d from T able 1 t h a t th e median age o f S p an ish -su rn am e a d u l t s o b ta in e d by th e w r i t e r and by th e U. S. Bureau o f th e Census a re a b o u t the same, 37*2 and 37-1 r e s p e c t i v e l y . 81 TABLE 1 COMPARISON OP THE AGE OP POMONA SPANISH-SURNAME PERSONS IN THE WRITER’S SAMPLE WITH DATA PROM THE U. S. CENSUS OP I960 Age W rite r 1s Sample U. S. C en sus3 Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 21-29 35 2 3 -8 777 2 6 .5 30-39 50 3 4 .0 908 3 0 .9 40 -4 9 24 1 6 .3 515 1 7 .6 50-59 21 1 4 .3 376 1 2 .9 60-69 12 8 .2 215 7 .1 70 o r o v e r 5 3-4 152 5 -1 T o ta l 147 1 0 0 ,0 2 ,9 4 3 b 100 .1 Median 3 7 .2 3 7 .1 a U. P o p u la tio n S. and B ureau o f H o u s in g : th e C en sus, U. S. C ensuses o f i 9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s , Los A n g e les- Long B each, C a l i f . S ta n d a rd M e t r o p o li t a n S t a t i s t i c a l A rea, p . 606. ^ I n c l u d e s 1 ,4 0 2 m ales and 1 ,5 4 1 fe m a le s . 82 T able 2 i n d i c a t e s a h i g h e r e s t i m a t e o f t o t a l f a m ily income by th e w r i t e r th a n by th e Census B ureau. The m edian o b t a i n e d by th e w r i t e r i s h i g h e r by $575. T hus, th e w r i t e r ' s sample may be b i a s e d n o t o n ly i n th e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e more s t a b l e e le m e n ts i n th e p o p u l a t i o n , 1 P b u t a l s o th e more p r o s p e r o u s . Since w i t h r e f e r e n c e to s c h o o lin g t h e w r i t e r d e a l t w ith a l l a d u l t s , b u t th e Census B ureau o n ly w ith th o s e 25 y e a r s o f age o r o l d e r , th e two s e t s o f .f i g u r e s i n T able 3 a re n o t s t r i c t l y c o m p a rab le. I t i s u n d e r s t a n d a b le t h e r e f o r e , t h a t th e m edian number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g f o r th e w r i t e r ' s younger p o p u l a t i o n , 9.b-, i s h i g h e r th a n t h a t f o r t h e Census B u r e a u 's somewhat o l d e r p o p u l a t i o n , 8 .7 - T e s tin g o f H ypo theses H ypo theses were t e s t e d by c o m p ilin g c o n tin g e n c y t a b l e s and c a l c u l a t i n g th e s t a t i s t i c s o f c h i s q u a re and o f 12I t s h o u ld be f u r t h e r n o te d t h a t th e i 960 Census was ta k e n i n 1 9 5 9 ^ hence p a r t o f th e d i f f e r e n c e may be a t t r i b u t a b l e to . i n f l a t i o n . 83 TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF THE INCOME OF POMONA SPANISH-SURNAME FAMILIES IN THE WRITER'S SAMPLE WITH'DATA FROM THE U. S. CENSUS OF I960 W r i t e r ' s Sample U. S. C ensus3 Num P er Num P er Income b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Under $ 4 ,0 0 0 32 2 3 .4 380 2 8 .5 4 ,0 0 0 - 5 ,9 9 9 43 3 1 .4 429 3 2 .1 6 ,0 0 0 - 7 ,9 9 9 37 2 7 .0 308 2 3 .1 8 ,0 0 0 o r o v e r 25 1 8 .2 218 1 6 .3 T o t a l 137 1 0 0 .0 1 ,3 3 5 1 0 0 .0 Median $ 5 ,7 0 4 $ 5 ,1 2 9 a U. S. B ureau o f th e C ensus, U. S. C ensuses o f P o p u la tio n and H o u sin g : i 9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s . Los Angeles- Long B each, C a l i f . S ta n d a r d M e t r o p o li t a n S t a t i s t i c a l . A rea, TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF THE SCHOOLING OF POMONA SPANISH-SURNAME PERSONS IN THE WRITER'S SAMPLE WITH DATA FROM THE U. S. CENSUS OF I9 6 0 Number o f Y ears o f S c h o o lin g Com pleted W riter* s Sample u. S. C ensus3 Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r P er c e n t 0-8 59 40.1 1 ,4 1 9 5 5 .3 9-11 47 3 2 .0 623 2 4 .1 12 o r more 41 27.9 532 2 0 .6 T o t a l 147 100.0 2 ,5 7 4 1 0 0 .0 M edian 9 .4 8 .7 a P e rso n s 25 y e a r s o f age o r o v e r. U. S. B ureau o f th e C ensus, U. S. C ensuses o f P o p u la tio n and H o u sin g : I9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s . Los Angeles-Long B each, C a l i f . S ta n d a rd M e tr o p o lita n S t a t i s t i c a l Area, p . 606. th e c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n tin g e n c y (c). S t a t i s t i c a l n u l l h y p o th e s e s were r e j e c t e d a t th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . In th e c a s e o f n o n s i g n i f i c a n t r e s u l t s , d i s c u s s i o n of th e r e l a t i o n s h i p s has u s u a l l y been o m it t e d from t h i s r e p o r t , u n l e s s t h e r e were p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t e r e s t i n g r e a s o n s f o r doing so . CHAPTER IV POMONA'S MEXICAN COMMUNITY The C i ty o f Pomona i s i n t h e e a s t e r n m o s t p a r t o f Los A n g eles C ounty, a p p r o x i m a t e ly 28 m i l e s from th e C iv ic C e n te r o f Los A n g e le s. The m a jo r c i t i e s o f P a sa d e n a , San B e r n a r d i n o , R i v e r s i d e and S a n ta Ana a r e a l s o a l l l o c a t e d w i t h i n a r a d i u s o f 30 m il e s from Pomona. I t i s s i t u a t e d i n t h e Pomona V a lle y , 1 8 ''by 20 m i l e s , b o r d e r e d by th e San G a b r i e l M oun tain s on th e n o r t h , th e San Jo s e H i l l s on t h e w e s t, and t h e P u e n te H i l l s on t h e s o u th . O ccupying an a r e a o f a b o u t 20 s q u a r e m i l e s , t h e c i t y l i e s a t an a l t i t u d e o f betw een 760 and 1 ,1 5 0 f e e t above se a l e v e l and e n jo y s a M e d ite r r a n e a n s u b t r o p i c a l c l i m a t e . R a in , f a l l i n g m o s t ly i n t h e w i n t e r m onth s, a v e r a g e s 1 9 -2 7 in c h e s a n n u a l l y . The a v e r a g e mean t e m p e r a tu r e i s 61 d e g re e s F a h r e n h e i t , w i t h an a v e ra g e maximum t e m p e r a t u r e o f 78 and an a v e ra g e minimum o f 45- The c i t y i s s e r v e d by t h r e e m a jo r t r a n s c o n t i n e n t a l r a i l r o a d s (S a n ta Fe, S o u th e rn P a c i f i c and Union P a c i f i c ) 86 87 and t h r e e m ajo r U. S. highway r o u t e s (60, 66 and 7 0 ) . A g r i c u l t u r a l p r o d u c t i o n o f th e s u r r o u n d in g a r e a i s p r i m a r i l y i n c i t r u s , l i v e s t o c k , d a i r y , p o u l t r y , v e g e t a b l e s , and d e c id u o u s f r u i t s . The c i t y i t s e l f i s th e l o c a t i o n o f more th a n one h u n d red d i v e r s i f i e d i n d u s t r i a l p l a n t s . - 1 ' S o c i a l H i s t o r y From t h e p o i n t o f view o f th e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h r e p o r t , th e m ost im p o r ta n t a s p e c t o f t h e s o c i a l h i s t o r y o f Pomona i s t h a t d e a l in g w ith th e developm ent o f e t h n i c and c l a s s r e l a t i o n s i n th e c i t y . The e a r l y h i s t o r y o f th e r e l a t i o n s betw een t h e S p a n is h - s p e a k in g p e o p le and th e E n g li s h - s p e a k in g p e o p le i n th e Pomona a r e a can be t r a c e d th r o u g h t h r e e g e n e r a l s t a g e s . F i r s t , t h e r e was th e p e r i o d o f M exican a sc e n d a n c y , b e f o r e 1848, when th e S p a n is h s p e a k in g p e o p le w ere v i r t u a l l y th e o n ly i n h a b i t a n t s o t h e r th a n t h e I n d i a n s . D uring th e second p e r i o d , 1848-1875> th e f i r s t wave o f Am ericans came i n and began r a p i d l y to a c q u i r e l a n d h o l d i n g s . The two e t h n i c g ro u p s g e n e r a l l y 1 Pomona C ity P la n n in g Commission, F a c ts ab o u t Pomona (Pomona: The Commission, 1 9 5 5 P* !• 88 a c c e p te d eac h o t h e r on a b a s i s o f s o c i a l e q u a l i t y . Dur in g th e t h i r d p e r i o d , 1875-1890, th e S p a n ish -sp e a k in g p e o p le l o s t v i r t u a l l y a l l t h e i r la n d , and began to occupy l a r g e l y a se co n d a ry p l a c e on an e th n ic s c a l e . What i s now Pomona was p a r t o f th e Rancho San Jo se g r a n t e d i n 1837 by th e Mexican governm ent to t h r e e o r i g i n a l ow ners, Ygnacio P alom ares, R icard o V e ja r, and L uis A renas, who u se d th e la n d f o r c a t t l e r a i s i n g . The P alom ares and V e ja r f a m i l i e s i n t e r m a r r i e d w ith each o t h e r , w ith th e landow ning Yorba fa m ily o f Orange County and w ith p ro m in en t Anglo and S p a n is h -s p e a k in g f a m i l i e s o f Sou thern C a l i f o r n i a . As long as th e y commanded economic power, th e s e e a r l y landow ning f a m i l i e s i n t h e i r many b ran c h es c o n tin u e d to e n jo y h ig h p r e s t i g e and i n t e r m a r r i a g e w ith th e dom inant Anglo gro up d u rin g th e American p e r i o d . The f i r s t two d e cad es o f Anglo r u l e were g e n e r a l l y c h a r a c t e r i z e d by p e a c e f u l c o o p e r a tio n betw een th e two p r i n c i p a l e th n i c g ro u p s. M ig ra tio n c o n tin u e d from Mexico, l a r g e l y , a s Burma n o t e s , "a two-way t r a f f i c o f sh e p h e rd s , cowboys, ra n c h h a n d s, and common l a b o r e r s who d id n o t t h i n k o f th e m se lv e s as im m ig ra tin g ; t h e y went n o r t h to work as th e y went e a s t , w e s t, and s o u th , and i t was i n c i d e n t a l t h a t 89 th e y c r o s s e d an i n t e r n a t i o n a l b o r d e r to work and r e c r o s s e d p i t to r e t u r n hom e.' Members o f th e o ld landow ning f a m i l i e s m a in ta in e d g r e a t s o c i a l d i s t a n c e betw een them s e l v e s and th e more r e c e n t and l e s s a f f l u e n t im m ig ran ts from Mexico. The econom ic d e c l i n e o f t h e s e f a m i l i e s began d u r in g th e 1 8 6 0 ' s w ith a s u c c e s s io n o f d ro u g h t y e a r s a s s o c i a t e d w ith a d ro p i n th e demand f o r b e e f . The lan do w n ers h a d f u r t h e r to f i g h t lo n g le,gal b a t t l e s t o prov e t i t l e , h ad d i f f i c u l t y com prehending t a x a t i o n and Anglo l e g a l s y s tem s, and had gone d e e p ly i n t o d e b t a t e x c e s s iv e r a t e s o f i n t e r e s t . S a le o f la n d , f o r c e d o r o t h e r w is e , became an econom ic n e c e s s i t y . The g r e a t ra n c h e s were s u b d iv id e d f o r sm all fa rm s , o r c h a r d s , and r e s i d e n t i a l l o t s . 3 > ^ When members o f th e u p p e r s tr a tu m began to c a l l th em se lv e s O John H. Burma, S p a n ish -S p e a k in g Groups i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s (Durham: Duke U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 19 54), P« 40. 3 W . W . R obin son , Panoram a: a P i c t u r e H is to r y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a (Los A n g e le s: T i t l e I n s u r a n c e and T r u s t Company, 1953)* 4 Bess Adams G a rn er and Miriam C o lco rd P o s t, The S t o r y o f th e Adobe de P alom ares i n Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a (C lare m o n t, C a l i f . : S au nd ers P r e s s , 1 940 ), pp. 11-14. "S p an ish " to d i s t i n g u i s h th e m s e lv e s from t h e d e sc e n d a n ts o f th e l o w e r - c l a s s s e t t l e r s , with wtiom at f i r s t th e y r e f u s e d t o i n te r m a r r y , i s n o t k n o w n ; ^ late i n the 1 8 8 0 's b o th group s were s t i l l known as " M e x i c a n s . " ^ I n t e r e s t i n g l y , d e s c e n d a n ts o f th e low er s t r a t u m s t i l l l a t e r began to (and g e n e r a l l y s t i l l do) c a l l t h e m s e lv e s " S p a n is h " t o d i s t i n g u i s h th e m se lv e s from th e n u m e ro u s Mexican im m igrants o f th e 1 9 1 0 's and 1 9 2 0 's . A p p a r e n t l y , the u s e of "S p a n ish by grown c h il d r e n o f th e l a t t e r g r o u p dates from a b o u t th e World War I I p e r i o d . In 1868 t h e fam ily o f Rober*t S. A r n e t t came from M i s s i s s i p p i to what I s now Pomona a s its f i r s t American s e t t l e r s . O thers soon a rr iv e d , b u t d id not im m e d ia te ly d is p la c e th e l o c a l p eo ple from p o s i t i o n s o f l e a d e r s h i p . As l a t e a s th e 1 8 7 0 's p e rs o n s of M e x i c a n d e s c e n t h e ld prom inent p o s i t i o n s in th e com m unity- For exam p le, F ra n c is c o P alo m ares, son o f Ygnacio ^ served a s County S u p e r v is o r from 1872 to 1875* In 1 8 7 0 seven S p a n ish - ^ Carey McWilliams, North f r o m Mexico ( P h ila d e lp h ia J . B. L ip p i n c o t t C o ., 1949), p. 90. ^Emma H. Adams, To and Fro, Up and Down in South ern C a l i f o r n i a , Oregon and W ash in g to n T e r r i t o r y ( C i n c i n n a t i : C ra n sto n and Stowe, 1 8 8 8 ) , p. 129* 91 surname p e rs o n s p e t i t i o n e d f o r th e f o u n d a tio n o f th e P alo m a res School D i s t r i c t , w hich a t t h a t tim e i n c l u d e d Pomona. When th e d i s t r i c t was form ed, Ramon V e ja r and F r a n c i s c o Palo m ares s e rv e d as t r u s t e e s . ^ The s i t u a t i o n began t o change when th e r a i l r o a d s a r r i v e d i n th e a r e a and th e f i r s t s t e p s were ta k e n to e s t a b l i s h a c i t y . The 1 8 7 0 's and l 8 8 0 's were th e p e r i o d s o f r a i l r o a d e x p a n s io n i n S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a and th o u sa n d s o f r a i l r o a d w o rk e rs were im p o rte d from Mexico. Many o f t h e r a i l r o a d l a b o r camps became th e Mexican c o lo n i a s o f to d a y .® B ecause r a i l r o a d work was s e a s o n a l , th e w o rk e rs k e p t d r i f t i n g o f f t o o t h e r ty p e s o f o c c u p a ti o n s , such as t h e p i c k i n g o f o ra n g e s and lem ons. A c o n t i n u a l r e c r u i t m ent o f r a i l r o a d w o rk e rs from Mexico was th e r e b y made n e c e s s a r y . These w o rk e rs h e lp e d to b u i l d th e S o u th e rn P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d w hich came t o Pomona i n 1875*^ The coming o f th e r a i l r o a d had a d u a l e f f e c t on t h e s t a t u s r e l a t i o n s among p e r s o n s o f M exican d e s c e n t i n ^Roy L. D r i s c o l l , e d . , Pomona V a lle y Community Book (Pomona: A rth u r H. Cawston, 1 9 5 0 ), pp. 153-57* ®McWilliams, o p . c i t . , p. 169. ^ D r i s c o l l , op. c i t . , p p . 87- 8 8 . th e Pomona a r e a . In th e f i r s t p l a c e , i t b ro u g h t i n a new and n o n a c c u l t u r a t e d l o w - s t a t u s g ro u p o f M exicans, th u s lo w e rin g th e p o s i t i o n o f th e g ro up a s a w hole. S eco n d ly , th e r a i l r o a d began to b r i n g i n a g r e a t many A nglo-A m erican im m ig ra n ts. The l a t t e r , f o r th e m ost p a r t , came as f a m i l i e s , hence had l i t t l e n eed to c o n t r a c t m a r i t a l u n io n s w ith th e M exicans. F u rth e rm o re , th e d e c l i n e i n t h e w e a l t h and p r e s t i g e o f th e o l d landow ning f a m i l i e s made such u n io n s i n c r e a s i n g l y l e s s a t t r a c t i v e . The num erous p ro g en y o f th e o ld f a m i l i e s th u s had l i t t l e a l t e r n a t i v e to m a rry in g each o t h e r , th e Mexican newcomers, o r M issio n I n d i a n s . Pomona was f i r m l y e s t a b l i s h e d as a c i t y when a second p ro m o tio n a l v e n tu r e was s u c c e s s f u l i n 1881; th e c i t y was i n c o r p o r a t e d i n 18 8 7 . By t h i s tim e t h e r e were no S p a n ish -su rn a m e p e o p le e i t h e r on t h e Board o f T r u s t e e s o f t h e sc h o o l d i s t r i c t o r s e r v in g as c i t y o f f i c i a l s . No l o n g e r were M exicans among th e l o c a l e l i t e . I n c r e a s i n g s e t t l e m e n t , a b u rg e o n in g c i t r u s i n d u s t r y , (660 a c r e s were u n d e r c u l t i v a t i o n i n Pomona by 1885).» and th e a r r i v a l o f f u r t h e r r a i l c o n n e c tio n s a l l a id e d I n th e r a p i d A m e ric an i z a t i o n o f t h e a r e a . The coming o f th e A tc h is o n , Topeka 93 and S an ta Fe in 1886, th e y e a r o f a g r e a t la n d boom, h e lp e d dev elo p th e n e ig h b o rin g f o o t h i l l com m unities o f C larem ont, La Verne and San Dimas. The San Pedro, Los A ngeles and S a l t Lake R a il r o a d , now th e Union P a c i f i c , re a c h e d Pomona in 19 0 3 .IO In g e n e r a l , i t can be s a i d t h a t th e b u i ld i n g o f th e r a i l r o a d s , th e coming o f M exicans and E a s te r n e r s i n s i z e a b l e num bers, th e fo u n d in g o f Pomona and th e grow th o f th e l o c a l c i t r u s I n d u s t r y were a l l i n t e r r e l a t e d and ro u g h l y contem poraneous e v e n t s . G arner and P o st c h a r a c t e r i z e d th e e a r l y p a r t o f t h i s e r a as f o llo w s : By 1890 th e l i f e o f th e Rancho San Jo se had become t h a t o f an American f r o n t i e r though even a t t h i s tim e th e m a j o r i t y o f p e o p le In th e V a lle y were o f H isp a n ic o r i g i n . They a c c e p te d th e Anglo-Saxon e ra b u t were n o t y e t a b so rb e d i n t o i t . 11 An i n d i c a t i o n o f th e c u l t u r a l I s o l a t i o n o f th e group I s t h e f a c t t h a t n o t a s i n g l e S p an ish-surnam e p e rs o n was g r a d u a te d from Pomona e le m e n ta ry s c h o o ls d u rin g th e y e a r s 1887 th ro u g h 1890.12 10I b i d . , p. 93- in 1 G arn er and P o s t, op. c i t . , p. 21. 12Pomona C ity P u b lic S c h o o ls, F i r s t Annual R ep o rt (Pomona: D a lly Times P r i n t i n g House, 1891)> P* 84. 94 Pomona c o n tin u e d f o r lo n g t h e r e a f t e r a s a s m a ll town i n a p r e p o n d e r a n t l y r u r a l a r e a . In 1887 th e r e s i d e n t i a l and b u s i n e s s p a r t s o f town e x te n d e d o n ly one b lo c k n o r t h o f H o lt Avenue, b u t some t e n b lo c k s to th e s o u t h . The town e x te n d e d a b o u t seven b lo c k s b o th e a s t and w e st o f G arey Avenue. -*-3 Some o f th e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y r e s i d e n ce s s o u th o f H o lt a r e s t i l l s t a n d i n g and now o c c u p ie d p r i m a r i l y by M exican f a m i l i e s . 1^ The s o c i a l c l a s s system f o r lo n g was p r i m a r i l y two f o l d : m i d d l e - c l a s s Anglos owned th e c i t r u s o r c h a r d s and b u s i n e s s e s ; M exicans p ic k e d f r u i t , m a in ta in e d t h e r a i l r o a d s and d i d o t h e r t y p e s o f u n s k i l l e d j o b s . Some fo und b e t t e r work e ls e w h e r e , some w ent b ack to M exico. What was p r o b a b ly a c o lo n y o f d w in d lin g s i z e was r e i n f o r c e d , b e g in n in g aro u n d t h e t u r n o f th e c e n t u r y , w ith th e g r e a t e s t im m ig ra tio n waves o f all.-. For t h r e e d e c a d e s , 1900- 1930, M exicans came i n l a r g e num bers f l e e i n g p o v e r t y and ^ t . D. B e a s le y , P i c t u r e s q u e Pomona (New York: Photo E n g ra v in g Co., 1 887)• 14 Compare p h o to g r a p h s i n Pomona F i r e D epartm en t S o u v e n ir (Pomona: P u b lis h e d i n th e I n t e r e s t o f th e R e l i e f Fund o f t h e Pomona F i r e D e p artm en t, 1903)* 95 r e v o l u t i o n a r y c o n d i t i o n s i n Mexico and coming t o f i l l th e lo w e st s t r a t a in Pomona s o c i e t y . The m a j o r i t y o f p e r s o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t in Pomona today a r e th ese Im m ig ran ts and t h e i r c h i l d r e n . The a r e a s from w hich th e im m ig ran ts came have l a r g e l y been t h e p o v e r t y - s t r i c k e n a r e a s o f c e n t r a l h i g h la n d Mexico, p a r t i c u l a r l y th e s t a t e s of G u a n aju a to and J a l i s c o . ^ i t I s a ls o t h e a re a w h ere th e re w as the l a r g e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f la n d i n th e hands o f big p r o p r i e t o r s , w i t h " l /T the peons o b lig ed to em igrate p e r io d ic a lly . In the re se a r c h e r 's sample, a higher percentage o f respondents came from the s t a t e s o f Guana juato_(31 • 3) and J a lis c o (l8-7) than any other Mexican s t a t e s , and the same was true o f Immigrant parents of respondents ( 2 5 .0 and 19-6 r e s p e c tiv e ly)- Im m igrants In t h e w r i t e r ' s sample came to the U n ite d S t a t e s p r e p o n d e r a n t l y in t h e two d e c a d e s 1910-1919 and 1920-1929; 4 3 .8 and 3 7 .5 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y . P a r e n t s o f r e s p o n d e n ts came p r i m a r i l y cfiuring t h e th re e ^ M a n u e l Gamio, Mexican Im m ig ratio n t o the U n ite d S t a t e s (C hicago: U n i v e r s i t y o f C hicago P r e s s , 1930), p . 156. • ^ I b id ., pp. 22- 2 3 . 96 d e ca d es 1 9 0 0 -1 9 2 9 (89*3 p e r cent o f th e t o t a l ) w ith as many coming i n th e d e c a d e 1910-1919 (45.0 p e r c e n t) as i n th e o th e r tw o d e c a d e s. One r e s p o n d e n t came a s r e c e n t l y a s th e decade 1950-1959 and one p a r e n t d u r in g th e decade 1860-1869. D urin g th e e a r l y decades o f the c e n t u r y "M exicans" w e re s e g r e g a t e d in Pomona movie t h e a t e r s , s c h o o l s , and e ls e w h e re , a l t h o u g h th e "S p an ish " from whom t h e y were p h y s i c a l l y now i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e , w ere riot s e g r e g a t e d n o r lo o k e d down u p o n . 17 S i n c e about W orld War I , however, t h e Mexicans o f d i f f e r e n t s o c ia l c l a s s e s and e th n i c o r i g i n s have g r a d u a l l y b een e ra s in g w h a te v e r b o u n d a r ie s e v e r s t o o d between them and h a v e l a r g e l y f u n c t i o n e d as a s i n g l e subm erged e th n ic g ro u p , n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g f r e q u e n t l i p - s e r v i c e p a i d to th e " f i n e o ld S p a n ish f a m i l i e s . " Many o f the d e s c e n d a n ts o f t h e p i o n e e r S p a n ish sp e a k in g f a m i l i e s s t i l l l i v e in t h e Pomona a r e a . ^ In ^ R i c h a r d W . A rm our, Drug S t o r e Days (New York: McGraw-Hill B o o k Co., 1 9 5 9 ) , p. 1 4 0 . 1 o The r e s e a r c h e r was I n t e r e s t e d in o b s e r v in g t h a t t h e o ld e r g e n e r a t i o n s , a s judged b y t h e i r p o r t r a i t s , w ere l a r g e l y E u ro p e a n in a p p e a ra n c e . The more r e c e n t g e n e r a tio n s o f th e s e f a m i l i e s are l a r g e l y m e s ti z o in a p p e a ra n c e m o s tly a s a r e s u l t o f e x te n s iv e i n t e r m a r r i a g e w ith Mexican imm i g r a n t s and M i s s i o n I n d i a n s . c o n t r a s t to t h e e a r l y days when t h e f a m i l i e s owned t h o u sands o f a c r e s , o n ly a v e ry few f a m ily members owned aB much a s a h u n dred a c r e s by th e 1 9 2 0 's . By t h e 1 9 6 0 's t h e s e p e o p le , I f th e y owned la n d a t a l l , had h o ld in g s co n f i n e d t o a few c i t y o r c o u n tr y l o t s . Many o f th e p e rs o n s b e a r i n g th e o l d f a m ily names l i v e i n o ld h o u s e s , n o t w e ll m a in ta in e d , i n th e l e s s d e s i r a b l e p a r t s o f town and th e b re a d w in n e rs a r e engaged p r i m a r i l y i n manual o c c u p a tio n s o f v a r i o u s s o r t s . In th e e t h n i c s t r u c t u r e a new e l i t e has a r i s e n to t a k e th e p l a c e o f t h e o l d f a m i l i e s : se c o n d - g e n e r a t l o h M exican-A m ericans s u c c e s s f u l i n b u s i n e s s and th e p r o f e s s i o n s . The c h i l d r e n o f th e im m ig ran ts o f 1 9 1 0 's and 1 9 2 0 's a re now i n th e p r o c e s s o f rem oving th e l a s t s e g r e g a t i o n a l b a r r i e r s betw een th e m s e lv e s and th e m a j o r i t y p o p u l a t i o n . Not o n ly th e p o s i t i o n o f th e M exican-A m erican com m u n ity , b u t th e c i t y as a whole h a s , o f c o u r s e , been u n d e rg o in g im p o r ta n t s o c i a l c h an g e s. Since World War I I Pom ona's c i t r u s a c r e a g e h a s r a p i d l y been r e p l a c e d by t r a c t h o u sin g d e v e lo p m e n ts, and Pomona can no l o n g e r be r e g a r d e d p r i m a r i l y as an a g r i c u l t u r a l c e n t e r . With th e p o p u l a t i o n grow th i n th e Los A ngeles b a s i n , and i n d u s t r i a l i z a t i o n e s p e c i a l l y a t t r i b u t a b l e to World War I I and t h e Cold War, th e Pomona r e g i o n i s i n c r e a s i n g l y more su burban y e t m a in ta in s an i n d u s t r i a l c h a r a c t e r . I n th e words o f Pomona1s M ayor: F o rm e rly th e t r a d i n g and s o c i a l c e n t e r o f a l a r g e a g r a r i a n economy, Pomona i s r a p i d l y c o m p le tin g th e t r a n s i t i o n to a c o m m e r c i a l - i n d u s t r i a l com plex. The m edian income i n th e community c l o s e l y a p p ro x im a te s t h a t f o r th e whole c o u n ty . . . . Long r a t h e r i s o l a t e d from th e m e t r o p o l i t a n c e n t e r . . , to d a y i t i s s t i l l e s s e n t i a l l y c o n s e r v a t i v e and r e s e r v e d i n n a t u r e . 1-9 The change i n th e econom ic b a se o f th e Pomona a r e a has had im p o r ta n t i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r th e employment o p p o r t u n i t i e s a v a i l a b l e f o r Pomona 1s M exicans as d is c u s s e d below . Because o f t h e c o n ti n u i n g m ig r a ti o n o f Anglos to Pomona, th e Mexican m i n o r i t y h a s rem ain ed a s m a ll p r o p o r t i o n o f th e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n , hen ce n o t o v e r l y " v i s i b l e . " Nor have th e newcomers been i n t e r e s t e d i n m a i n t a i n in g th e o ld " c i t r u s " c a s t e sy ste m . A ll o f th e s e t r e n d s have gone hand i n hand w ith t h e c o n ti n u i n g a s s i m i l a t i o n o f second g e n e r a t i o n M exicans a s th e o l d e r Im m igran t g e n e r a t i o n , w i t h i t s employment h i s t o r y o f f r u i t p i c k i n g and r a i l r o a d ^ A r t h u r H. Cox, Youth i n Pomona (Pomona, 1 9 5 9), p. 2. 99 m a in te n a n c e , g r a d u a l l y d i e s o f f . The g ro w th o f th e Mexi can p o p u l a t i o n o f Pomona, shown i n T able 4 i s a t t r i b u t a b l e n o t o n ly t o n a t u r a l i n c r e a s e , b u t a ls o to c o n ti n u i n g i n - m ig r a ti o n from n e a rb y r u r a l and su bu rb an com m u nities, o t h e r s t a t e s , and, to a d e c r e a s i n g e x t e n t , from M exico. The M exican-A m erican community o f Pomona h as long been s t a b l e . F or exam ple, a b o u t h a l f o f th e Mexican p u p i l s a t Frem ont J u n i o r High i n 1941 had been b orn i n Pomona, and o v e r 80 p e r c e n t had a ls o been e n r o l l e d i n Pomona s c h o o ls th e p r e v io u s y e a r . Pomona's M exicans a re n o t now, and have n e v e r b e e n , p r i n c i p a l l y o f th e m ig ra n t l a b o r c l a s s so o f t e n d e s c r i b e d as " t y p i c a l " i n th e l i t e r a t u r e . In o t h e r ways i t a ls o a p p e a ls t h a t th e M exican- American p o p u l a t i o n o f Pomona i s i n c e r t a i n ways q u i t e a t y p i c a l o f M exican com m unities i n t h i s s t a t e . B eard c o n c lu d e d some two d ecad es ago t h a t , th e Mexican p o p u l a t i o n i n Pomona i s more s t a b l e , b e t t e r h o u sed and more h i g h l y e d u c a te d th a n most Mexican g ro u p s i n C a l i f o r n i a com m un ities. The e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s h i g h e r s t a n d a r d o f l i v i n g d o u b t l e s s r e s i d e s i n th e n o n - m ig r a to r y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f th e p o p u l a t i o n and th e g e n e r a l te n d e n c y f o r th e b re a d w in n e rs i n th e homes to be r e g u l a r l y 100 TABLE 4 POPULATION OP POMONA, 1900-19603 M exican Non-Mexican Y ear Number Per c e n t Number P e r c e n t T o t a l 1900 100 1 .8 5 ,4 2 6 9 8 . 2 5 ,5 2 6 1910 200 2 .0 1 0 ,0 0 7 9 8 . 0 1 0 ,2 0 7 1920 1 ,3 0 0 9 .6 1 2 ,2 0 5 9 0 . 4 1 3 ,5 0 5 1930 1 ,8 0 0 8 .7 1 9 ,0 0 4 9 1 . 3 . 2 0 ,8 0 4 1940 2,0 0 0 8.5 2 1 ,5 3 9 9 1 -5 2 3 ,5 3 9 1950 3 ,1 9 2 9 .0 3 2 ,2 1 3 9 1 . 0 3 5 ,4 0 5 I9 6 0 6,1 61 9 .2 6 0 ,9 9 6 9 0 . 8 6 7 ,1 5 7 aE s t im a te s by w r i t e r from v a rio u s p u b l i c a t i o n s o f t h e U. S. B ureau o f th e Census; f o r 1950, U. S. Bureau o f th e C ensus. P e rso n s o f S p a n ish Surname (W ashington, D. C. : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1953; f o r I9 60, U. S. B u re a u o f t h e C ensus, U. S. C ensuses o f P o p u la tio n an d H ousing, I9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s , Los A ngeles-L ong B each, C a l i f . S ta n d a r d M e tr o p o li t a n Area (W ashington, D. C. : Govern- m ent P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1 9 6 2 ). 101 20 em ployed. S o c i o c u l t u r a l O r ig in s The c u l t u r a l m i l i e u from w h ich t h e Im m igrants h a v e come and which i n p a r t t h e y have b r o u g h t w i t h them to t h e U n ite d S t a t e s , i s d i f f i c u l t to d e f i n e . I t s m ost o u t s t a n d in g f e a t u r e , how ever, p r o b a b ly has been i t s h e t e r o g e n e i t y , w ith r e f e r e n c e to b o th r e g i o n a l and c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s . 21 N e v e r t h e l e s s , m ost w r i t e r s have e m p h asized t h e "fo lk " n a t u r e o f th e c u l t u r e from w hich m ost o f th e im m igrants a re s a i d to have come: " r e l a t i v e l y hom ogeneous, molded i n t o i t s p h y s i c a l e n v iro n m en t and s o c i a l l y i n t e g r a t e d . " 22 As Humphrey d e s c r i b e s i t : The group l i f e s ta n d s u n e q u iv o c a l l y above th e i n d i v i d u a l - - t h e n o ncon form er can f i t i n no p la c e . F o r a lm o st a l l s i t u a t i o n s t h e r e a r e r e a d y made d e f i n i t i o n s ; a l l t h a t i s known and d e s i r e d o f l i f e f i n d s e x p r e s s io n w i t h i n th e g ro u p , as d e f in e d by 20 E. A lic e B eard, "A Study o f th e Mexican P u p ils i n t h e Fremont J u n i o r High S chool, Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a , i g 4 0 - 4 l " ( u n p u b lis h e d M a s t e r ’s t h e s i s , C larem ont C o l le g e s , 19 4 1 ), p . 28. 21 Ralph L. B e als and Norman D. Humphrey, No F ro n t i e r to L e a rn in g (M in n e a p o lis : U n i v e r s i t y o f M innesota P r e s s , 19 5 7 ), P* 10. 22Norman D. Humphrey, "The G e n e ric F o lk C u ltu re o f M exico," R u ra l S o c io lo g y , VTII (December, 1 9 4 3 ), 364. 102 th e group. The s e c u r i t y o f th e group i s o f p a r a mount Im p o rta n ce , f o r upon I t I n d i v i d u a l s e c u r i t y r e s t s . 23 Yet Pomona im m ig ran ts have come a s much from sm all towns and c i t i e s as from p e a s a n t v i l l a g e s . F u rth e rm o re , a few had m i d d l e - c l a s s s t a t u s i n Mexico, a lth o u g h m ost had been members o f th e mass l o w e r - c l a s s gro u p g e n e r a l l y c a l l e d g ente hum ilde (humble p e o p le ) . A rriv in g i n a la n d where t h e r e were more o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r advancem ent th a n th e y had known i n Mexico, th e im m ig ran ts to v a ry in g d e g re e s tu r n e d t h e i r b a c k s on th e homeland and began l e a r n i n g American ways. Many, however, r e t a i n e d a deep l o y a l t y to th e o ld c o u n try . Mexican immi g r a n ts have g e n e r a l l y been d e s c r ib e d as r e l u c t a n t to become n a t u r a l i z e d American c i t i z e n s , e i t h e r o u t of l o y a l t y to Mexico o r from a f a i l u r e to p e r c e i v e any b en e f i t s t h a t th e y c o u ld d e r iv e from chang ing t h e i r c i t i z e n ship s t a t u s . In th e sam ple in te r v ie w e d by th e w r i t e r , 43*8 p e r cen t o f th e im m ig ran ts had become n a t u r a l i z e d American c i t i z e n s ; of th e p a r e n t s o f r e s p o n d e n ts who w ere im m igrants and f o r which d a t a were a v a i l a b l e , o n ly 3 2 .2 p e r c e n t had 23Ibid., p. 365. become n a t u r a l i z e d . Only 32 o f th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple w ere b o rn i n M exico; th e o t h e r 115 were n a t i v e - b o r n A m ericans. The l a t t e r came from a v a r i e t y o f g e o g r a p h i c a l b a c k g ro u n d s, a lth o u g h o n ly 2 were b o rn o u t s i d e o f th e s o u th w e s te rn s t a t e s . In f a c t 7 6 , o r 6 6 .1 p e r c e n t o f th e A m erican- b o rn were b o rn i n S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , b u t o n ly 4, o r 3*5 p e r c e n t i n o t h e r r e g i o n s o f C a l i f o r n i a ; 2 8 .7 p e r c e n t w ere b o rn i n o t h e r s o u th w e s te rn s t a t e s . Of th e t o t a l num b e r o f A m erican-born r e s p o n d e n t s , 50, o r 43*5 p e r c e n t were b o rn i n th e Pomona V a lle y ; 32, o r 2 7 .8 p e r c e n t i n Pomona p r o p e r . A t o t a l o f 29 i n d i v i d u a l s , o r 2 5 -2 p e r c e n t o f a l l n a t i v e - b o r n r e s p o n d e n t s , were n a t i v e - b o r n Am ericans o f n a t i v e - b o r n p a r e n t s . Some o f t h e s e t h i r d and l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n p e r s o n s were d e s c e n d a n ts o f o l d C a l i f o r n i a f a m i l i e s , w h ile some w ere s c io n s o f o l d e r f a m i l i e s i n o t h e r s t a t e s , e s p e c i a l l y from th e S p an ish -A m erican o r H ispano a r e a . In Pomona, im m ig ra n ts , s e c o n d - g e n e r a t io n M exicans, o ld C a l i f o r n i a n s and H isp an os l i v e i n th e same a r e a s , p a r t i c i p a t e I n t h e same o r g a n i z a t i o n s , s o c i a l i z e and e x t e n s i v e l y i n t e r m a r r y w i t h each o t h e r a lth o u g h th e v a r i o u s ty p e s c o n tin u e d i f f e r e n t i a l l y to i d e n t i f y th e m s e lv e s . 104 A ll o f th e g ro u p s m e n tio n e d a re u n d e rg o in g s i m i l a r s o c i o p s y c h o l o g i c a l p r o c e s s e s , i . e . , a c c u l t u r a t i o n and u r b a n i z a t i o n . In s e v e r a l s e n s e s t h e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n i s becoming i n c r e a s i n g l y u r b a n iz e d . In th e f i r s t p l a c e , many o f th e im m ig ra n ts a re p r o d u c ts o f a r u r a l e n v iro n m en t i n Mexico and have undergone c hanges i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f an u rb an way o f l i f e , th e second g e n e r a t i o n even more so. Then, t h e r e i s an i n c r e a s i n g l y l a r g e r p e r c e n ta g e o f th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n r e s i d i n g i n u rb a n a r e a s . L ik e w is e , t h e com m unities i n w hich th e y r e s i d e have i n many c a s e s been tr a n s f o r m e d from sm a ll tow ns o r su b u rb s i n t o s i z e a b l e c i t i e s . T here h as a ls o b een a change i n th e o c c u p a ti o n a l s t r u c t u r e , w ith a d e c r e a s in g p e r c e n ta g e o f M exican-A m erican w o rk e rs i n r u r a l o c c u p a t i o n s such a s r a n c h in g and f r u i t p i c k i n g , and an i n c r e a s e i n th e p e r c e n ta g e o f p e r s o n s i n u rb a n employment su c h as m a n u f a c tu r in g , c o n s t r u c t i o n and s e r v i c e s . A ll o f th e s e t r e n d s a p p e a r to be e v i d e n t from t h e Pomona d a t a . The t r e n d tow ard u r b a n i z a t i o n o f t h e group h as r e s u l t e d i n a g r e a t e r d e g re e o f h e t e r o g e n e i t y . As S aun ders n o t e s " c l a s s d i v i s i o n s have grown s h a r p e r and th e v a r i o u s s u b -g ro u p s w i t h i n th e S p a n is h - s p e a k in g group a re n o t so 105 homogeneous a s th e y once w e r e . " 2^ Thus t h e s t r a t i f i c a t i o n p a t t e r n has tu r n e d a f u l l c y c l e . S t a r t i n g o u t as a tw o- c l a s s p a t t e r n o f landow ners and l a b o r e r s , th e p a t t e r n was l e v e l e d to a s i n g l e s e m i- c a s te group u n d e r A nglo-A m erican d o m in a tio n , b u t i n r e c e n t y e a r s u n d e r th e tw in im p a ct o f u r b a n i z a t i o n and i n d u s t r i a l i z a t i o n has changed once more to a t w o - c l a s s (o r c o n c e iv a b ly t h r e e - c l a s s ) system . P r e s e n t S o c i o c u l t u r a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s The s c h o o l, r a t h e r t h a n th e f a m i ly , i s th e c h i e f lo c u s o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n to American m i d d l e - c l a s s norm s. T h is i s due t o th e m ain c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f th e M exican f a m ily i n th e U n ited S t a t e s : l a r g e f a m i l i e s w ith m ale dominance and c o n s i d e r a b le i s o l a t i o n o f th e women, o n ly a sm a ll p r o p o r t i o n o f whom p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e l a b o r f o r c e . 25 Humphrey m a i n t a i n s t h a t changes i n fa m ily s t r u c t u r e 2^L y le S a u n d ers, C u l t u r a l D i f f e r e n c e and M ed ical Care (New York: R u s s e l l Sage F o u n d atio n , 195^)* P* 9^* ^ R a i p h L. B e a ls , " C u l t u r a l P a t t e r n s o f M exican American L i f e , " i n P ro c e e d in g s , F i f t h Annual C o n fe re n c e , S o u th w e ste rn C ou n cil on th e E d u c a tio n o f S p a n is h -S p e a k in g P eople (Los A ng eles, 1 9 5 1 P* 9- 106 c o n s t i t u t e a good in d e x o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n . T r a d i t i o n a l l y th e Mexican f a t h e r i s e x p e c te d t o be p r o v i d e r and p r o t e c t o r , t h e m oth er a homemaker and r e l i g i o u s i n s t r u c t o r . R e c r e a t i o n and o t h e r s o c i a l a c t i v i t i e s te n d to be s t r o n g l y fa m ily o r i e n t e d , th e fa m ily i n c l u d i n g a f f i n a l r e l a t i o n s . Ameri c a n -b o rn M exicans a re s a i d to p l a c e a h i g h valu e on an e x te n d e d ty p e o f f a m ily system . M a rrie d c h i l d r e n o f t e n l i v e i n an a d j o i n i n g h o u s e , i n a house a t th e r e a r , o r a t l e a s t w i t h i n s h o r t w a lk in g d i s t a n c e . The m a r r ie d s t a t u s i s t h e a c c e p te d one among th e . M exicans o f Pomona (se e T able 5)* Of th e w r i t e r * s e n t i r e sam ple o n ly 14, o r 9-5 p e r c e n t o f th e t o t a l were s i n g l e (n e v e r m a r r i e d ) . The t o t a l number o f d i v o r c e d and s e p a r a t e d (15) s l i g h t l y e x ceed s t h e number o f s i n g l e (1 4 ). I t i s a ls o v e ry l i k e l y t h a t some p e rs o n s l i s t e d as s i n g l e , widowed, s e p a r a t e d o r m a r r ie d h a d a t some tim e a c t u a l l y b een d i v o r c e d . Of th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple o f 56 m a r r ie d m ales, 6, o r 1 0 .7 pep c e n t w ere m a r r ie d to A nglos. There w ere no m a r r ia g e s to members o f any o t h e r d i f f e r e n t e th n ic g ro u p . Norman D. Humphrey, "Changing S t r u c t u r e o f th e D e t r o i t M exican F am ily; an In d ex o f A c c u l t u r a t i o n , " American S o c i o l o g i c a l Review, IX (December, 1941), 622, 107 TABLE 5 MARITAL STATUS OP RESPONDENTS M ales Fem ales M a r i ta l S t a tu s Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t T o t a l P e r c e n t M arried 56 8 6 .2 . 5 2 6 3 . 4 108 7 3 -5 S in g le 6 9 . 2 8 9 - 8 14 9 -5 D iv o rced - - 0 .0 8 9 . 8 8 5 - 4 S e p a ra te d 1 1 .5 6 7*3 r 4 . 8 Widowed 2 3 .1 8 9 - 8 10 6 . 8 T o t a l 65 1 0 0 . 0 82 1 0 0 .1 147 1 0 0 .0 108 F i r s t and se c o n d g e n e r a t i o n s have been s t r o n g l y endogam ous. T hree members o f t h e sam ple e a c h had an Anglo p a r e n t . A nother i n t e r e s t i n g f a c t i s t h a t a l l " S p a n i s h ” ( i . e . , H isp an o s and C a l i f o r n i a n s ) i n t h e sam ple w ere m a r r i e d e i t h e r t o f i r s t , s e c o n d , o r t h i r d g e n e r a t i o n "M exicans" o r to A n glo s, none to o t h e r " S p a n i s h ." I n m ost h o u s e h o ld s s t u d i e d by th e w r i t e r t h e r e were a t l e a s t two g e n e r a t i o n s , and t h r e e g e n e r a t i o n s were n o t uncommon, w i t h a c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y w ide ra n g e o f a g e s . Ages o f r e s p o n d e n t s v a r i e d from p e r s o n s i n t h e i r e a r l y t w e n t i e s t o p e r s o n s i n t h e i r m id d le e i g h t i e s (s e e T ab le 6 ) . The m edian age o f t h e M exican b o rn g e n e r a t i o n i s 55*3> o f th e se c o n d g e n e r a t i o n a d u l t s , 3^*1* F o r a l l A m e ric an -b o rn a d u l t s t h e m edian age i s 3 ^ .2 . The Im m ig ran t g e n e r a t i o n , I n s u f f i c i e n t l y r e p l e n i s h e d by r e c e n t a r r i v a l s i s r a p i d l y becom ing an aged p o p u l a t i o n , w h e rea s t h e A m erican -b o rn g e n e r a t i o n s more c l o s e l y re s e m b le th e r e s t o f th e Anglo a d u l t p o p u l a t i o n . The f i g u r e s on t h e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n can be com pared w i t h t h o s e o f th e t o t a l a d u l t p o p u l a t i o n o f Pomona, a s e s t i m a t e d by t h e w r i t e r from t h e i 960 c e n s u s d a t a : f o r m a le s t h e m edian age o f a d u l t s was 3 6 .8 , f o r f e m a le s 3 5 for a l l a d u l t s TABLE 6 GENERATION AND AGE OF RESPONDENTS Age G e n era tio n 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 T o ta l Median F i r s t » 2 7 12 8 2 1 32 55-3 Second 24 41 11 5 3 2 — 86 34.1 T h ird 5 1 1 1 — - - _ _ 8 27-5 F o u rth 2 1 1 1 - - — - - 5 34.5 C a li f o r n ia n s 2 3 3 2 — - - - - 10 39.5 H ispanos 2 2 1 — 1 6 34.5 T o ta l 35 50 24 21 12 4 1 1 4 7 . 37-2 c h i sq u a re = 58 .4 3 p = < .01 C = .533 F am ilism and an o r i e n t a t i o n to e x te n d e d k i n s h i p r e l a t i o n s have g e n e r a l l y been c o n s i d e r e d a s o b s t a c l e s to upward m o b i l i t y . However, h o u s e h o ld s w i t h more th a n two g e n e r a t i o n s o r w ith c o l l a t e r a l r e l a t i o n s a r e n e i t h e r com mon i n Pomona, n o r d oes th e p r e s e n c e o f n o n - n u c l e a r f a m i ly members i n a h o u s e h o ld b e a r any a p p r e c i a b l e r e l a t i o n s h i p t o t o t a l f a m i ly s i z e . Only 18 f a m i l i e s o r 1 2 .2 p e r c e n t o f th e t o t a l have any members o t h e r th a n a g iv e n s e t o f p a r e n t s and t h e i r o f f s p r i n g . The i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s o f s c h o o l , a c c u l t u r a t i o n , and upw ard m o b i l i t y (o r l a c k o f i t ) a r e p a t e n t . C h a ra c t e r i s t i c a l l y , l a c k o f s c h o o l in g h as a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t e d th e M e x ica n s' c h a n c e s o f a c c u l t u r a t i n g and becoming u p w a rd ly m o b ile . Broom and Shevky n o t e t h a t : R e t a r d a t i o n i n t u r n , im posed an e d u c a t i o n a l c e i l i n g on t h e g ro u p w i t h th e v i c i o u s c i r c l e c o n s e q u e n c e s ; l i m i t e d s c h o o lin g r e t a r d e d a c c u l t u r a t i o n , s e t a r b i t r a r y jo b c e i l i n g s , 2?U. S. B ureau o f th e C ensus, U. S. C e n su ses o f P o p u l a t i o n and H o u sin g : I9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s , Los A n g e le s - Long B each, C a l i f . S ta n d a rd M e t r o p o l i t a n S t a t i s t i c a l Area (W ash in g to n , D. C . : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1 9 6 2 ), p p . 1 04-105. Ill c o n s t r i c t e d job o p p o r t u n i t i e s , and th e g ro u p became sy m b o liz ed by I t s s t e r e o t y p e .28 The s e r i o u s p ro b lem s o f t h e second and t h i r d g e n e r a t i o n s have b een e a r l y d r o p o u ts and p o o r s c h o o l a t t e n d a n c e , b e c a u se o f fo rm e r l a x e n fo rc e m e n t o f sc h o o l a tt e n d a n c e law s and o f many p a r e n t s 1 f a i l u r e t o com pre hend th e v a lu e o f e d u c a ti o n b e c a u se o f t h e i r own l i m i t e d e x p o su re t o I t . S e g r e g a te d s c h o o ls d id n o t h e l p s o lv e any o f t h e s e p ro b le m s. T ab le 7 i n d i c a t e s t h a t i n Pomona s c h o o lin g i s I n v e r s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h age, t h e r e b e in g c o n s i s t e n t l y h ig h m edian y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g f o r th e y o u n g e r age g ro u p s . T h is a s s o c i a t i o n h o ld s f o r b o th m ales and f e m a le s . While 65*7 p e r c e n t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s aged 20 -2 9 were h ig h s c h o o l g r a d u a t e s , o n l y 2 4 .0 p e r c e n t o f th o s e 30-39> 1 2 .5 p e r c e n t o f th o s e 4 0 -4 9 and 1 4 .3 o f t h o s e 50-59 were h ig h s c h o o l g r a d u a t e s . T here were no h ig h sc h o o l g r a d u a t e s among any o f t h e 17 p e r s o n s aged 60 o r o v e r . On th e o t h e r hand, i n t h e 60 o r o v e r g ro u p 8 8 .2 p e r c e n t had 8 o r fe w e r y e a r s o f s c h o o l i n g , w h ile i n th e 20-29 age g ro up o n l y 2 .9 p e r c e n t had 8 o r few er y e a r s pQ L eo n ard Broom and E s h r e f Shevky, "M exicans i n th e U n ited S t a t e s , " S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a r c h , XXXVI ( J a n u a r y - F e b r u a r y , 1 9 5 2 ), 153* I TABLE 7 AGE AND SCHOOLING OF RESPONDENTS 0-8 9-11 12 o r More T o ta l Num Per Num P er Num Per Num Per Age b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Median 20-29 1 2 .9 11 3 1 .4 23 6 5 .7 35 1 0 0 .0 1 1 .8 30-39 14 2 8 .0 24 4 8 .0 12 2 4 .0 50 1 0 0 .0 9 .9 40-49 12 5 0 .0 9 37-5 3 12 .5 24 1 0 0 .0 8.5 50-59 17 8 1 .0 1 4 .8 3 1 4 .3 21 100.1 4 .8 60-89 15 8 8 .2 2 1 1 .8 — — — — 17 1 0 0 .0 2 .8 T o ta l 59 4 0 .1 47 3 2 .0 41 2 7 .9 147 10 0 .0 9 .4 Males 24 3 6 .9 22 3 3 .8 19 2 9 .2 65 9 9 .9 9-5 Females 35 4 2 .7 25 30.5 22 2 6 .8 82 100 .0 9-2 c h i sq u are = 66.51 1 1 A .01 c = • 558 112 113 o f s c h o o l in g . T able 8 shows an i n v e r s e r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een g e n e r a t i o n and s c h o o lin g . L a r g e ly b e c a u se o l d e r p e rs o n s a re c o n c e n tr a te d i n th e e a r l i e r g e n e r a t i o n s t h e r e i s an i n v e r s e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een g e n e r a t i o n and s c h o o l in g ( s e e Table 5 )- These f i g u r e s can be compared w i t h th o s e o f th e t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n o f Pomona o v e r 25 f o r i 9 6 0 , where 4 7 -8 p e r c e n t had 8 o r few er y e a r s o f s c h o o l i n g , 2 4 .2 p e r c e n t had 9 t o 11 y e a r s , and 2 8 .0 p e r c e n t w ere h ig h sc h o o l g r a d u a t e s . T h e m edian number o f y e a r s c o m p lete d was 8 . 7 , a s compared w ith 9-4 f o r a l l M exican a d u l t s . The l i n g u i s t i c p a r t o f th e M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n s1 c u l t u r a l h e r i t a g e o f t e n s u r v i v e s , at l e a s t i n th e o r a l form , som etim es to th e e x c l u s i o n o f E n g l i s h . 30 a s l a t e as 1950 E n g li s h was th e m oth er ton g u e o f o n ly 7 p e r c e n t o f 6 9 9 ,2 2 0 M exicans o f f o r e i g n o r mixed p a r e n t a g e . ^ Language i s a l s o u n i v e r s a l l y one o f t h e sym bols o f s o c i a l and 29u. S. B ureau o f th e Census, o p . c i t . , pp. 104- 1 0 5 . 3 °W illiam L. A ltu s , "The M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n ,1 1 J o u r n a l o f S o c i a l P sy c h o lo g y , XXIX (May, 1 9 ^ 9 ), 213. 31 Burma, op. c i t . , p . 73* TABLE 8 GENERATION AND SCHOOLING OF RESPONDENTS G e n e ra tio n Y ears o f S ch ooling T o ta l Median 0- 8 9 -12 12 o r More Num- b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t F i r s t 29 90 .6 1 3 .1 2 6-3 32 1 00 .0 3.5 Second 24 27-9 37 4 3 .0 25 2 9 .0 86 99-9 1 0 .0 L a te r 6 20.7 9 3 1 .0 14 4 8 .3 29 10 0 .0 1 1 .3 T o ta l 59 40.1 47 3 2 .0 41 2 8 .0 147 100.1 9-4 c h i square = 47.26 P = < • 01 C = .493 tr ii 115 c u l t u r a l s t a t u s . The w id e s p r e a d u se o f b o th la n g u a g e s ( o f t e n i n th e sam e. s e n t e n c e ) among Pom ona's M exican- A m ericans w ould a p p e a r t o con note a r a p i d l y a c c u l t u r a t i n g e t h n i c g ro u p . Of a l l i n t e r v i e w s 7 0 .7 p e r c e n t were c o n d u c te d i n E n g l i s h and 2 9 .3 p e r c e n t i n S p a n ish . Male and fe m a le p r o p o r t i o n s (3 2 .3 and 2 6 .8 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y i n S p a n is h ) w ere n o t n o t i c e a b l y d i f f e r e n t . Of A m erican- b o rn r e s p o n d e n t s , 8 6 .1 p e r c e n t were i n t e r v i e w e d in E n g l i s h , b u t o n l y 1 5 .6 p e r c e n t o f th e im m ig ra n ts . Of th o s e i n t e r v i e w e d i n - S p a n i s h , 37-2 p e r c e n t were A m erican- b o rn (se e T ab le 9)- Of th o s e r e s p o n d e n ts w ith a t l e a s t a h ig h sc h o o l e d u c a ti o n 95*1 p e r c e n t w ere i n te r v ie w e d i n E n g li s h ; o f th o s e w ith 8 o r few er y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g 6 4 .4 p e r c e n t w ere i n t e r v i e w e d i n S p a n is h (see T a b le 1 0 ) . Of r e s p o n d e n ts i n t h e i r t w e n t i e s , 97*1 p e r c e n t w ere i n te r v ie w e d in E n g l i s h , and o f th o s e i n t h e i r t h i r t i e s , 8 6 .0 p e r c e n t. More th a n 90 p e r c e n t o f a l l th o s e 60 o r o v e r w ere i n t e r view ed i n S p a n is h (se e T ab le 1 1 ). The w r i t e r s e c u r e d d a ta from r e s p o n d e n ts c o n c e rn in g t h e i r u se o f S p a n is h -la n g u a g e m edia o f com m unication, h y p o t h e s i z i n g t h a t th o s e i n th e h a b i t o f l i s t e n i n g to 116 TABLE 9 GENERATION AND LANGUAGE PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS ___________ Language__________ E n g lis h S p a n ish T o ta l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P er G e n e r a tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t F i r s t 5 1 5 -6 27 8 4 .4 . 32 1 0 0 .0 Second 73 8 4 .9 13 15-1 86 1 0 0 .0 L a t e r 26 8 9 -7 3 1 0 .3 29 100 .1 T o ta l 104 7 0 .7 43 29-3 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 6 0 .0 4 p = < . 0 1 C = .5 3 9 117 TABLE 10 SCHOOLING AND LANGUAGE PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS Y e a rs o f S c h o o lin g Languag S p a n is h ;e E n g l i s h T o ta l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 0 - 8 38 6 4 .4 21 3 5 .6 59 1 0 0 .0 9 - H 3 6 .4 44 9 3 .6 47 1 0 0 .0 12 o r More 2 4 .9 39 9 5-1 41 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 43 2 9 -3 104 7 0 .7 147 1 0 0 .0 Median 4 . 0 - - 1 0 .6 9 -4 c h i s q u a r e = 5 8 .6 3 p = < . 01 C = . 534 118 TABLE 11 AGE AND LANGUAGE PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS ___________ Language______________ S p a n ish E n g lis h T o ta l Num- Per Num- P er Num- P e r Age b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t 20-29 1 2 .9 34 97*1 35 1 0 0 .0 30-39 7 1 4 .0 43 8 6 .0 50 100. 0 40-49 8 33*3 16 6 6 .7 24 1 0 0 .0 50-59 13 6 1 .9 8 38.1 21 1 0 0 .0 60-69 11 91*7 1 8 .3 12 1 0 0 .0 70-79 2 5 0 .0 2 5 0 .0 4 1 0 0 .0 80-89 1 100.0 •— — 1 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 43 2 9 .3 104 7 0 .7 147 1 0 0 .0 Median 53-7 — 33-7 — 37-2 c h i sq u are = 51*46 p = < . 0 1 C = -509 119 S p a n ish -la n g u a g e t e l e v i s i o n o r r a d io p ro g ram s, o r who a t t e n d S p a n ish -la n g u a g e m ovies, would be th e l e s s a c c u l- t u r a t e d i n d i v i d u a l s and hence l e s s l i k e l y to be upw ardly m o b ile . A n e g l i g i b l e number o f re s p o n d e n ts (2) s u b s c r ib e d to S p a n is h -la n g u a g e new sp ap ers. Only 12, o r 8 .2 p e r c e n t r e p o r t e d r e a d in g S p a n is h -la n g u a g e m ag azin es. The w r i t e r d id n o t a tte m p t to t e s t any h y p o th e s e s w ith r e f e r e n c e to th e s e two m edia. An a p p r e c i a b ly l a r g e r number o f re s p o n d e n ts r e p o r t e d l i s t e n i n g to S p a n is h -la n g u a g e r a d i o o r t e l e v i s i o n program s (4 2 .9 and 57-1 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . Only 3 2 .7 p e r c e n t o f a l l re s p o n d e n ts r e p o r t e d a tte n d a n c e a t l e a s t once a y e a r a t S p a n is h -la n g u a g e m ovies, d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t a downtown Pomona movie house showed such f i lm s e v ery Tuesday n i g h t d u r in g th e p e r i o d o f th e w r i t e r ' s r e s e a r c h , and th e y a re shown In t h e a t e r s i n o t h e r n e a rb y com m unities as w e ll. I t i s a r e a s o n a b le h y p o th e s is t h a t th e use o f S p a n ish i n th e home would be n e g a t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith h ig h s t a t u s and upward m o b i l i t y . Of a l l re s p o n d e n ts 7.6*2 p e r c e n t spoke S p a n ish to t h e i r p a r e n t s , 65*7 p e r c e n t spoke S p a n ish o r b o th la n g u a g e s t o t h e i r husbands o r w iv e s, 120 53*6 p e r c e n t spoke S p a n ish o r b o th la n g u a g e s to t h e i r c h i l d r e n , and th e c h i l d r e n o f o n ly 3 4 .7 p e r c e n t o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s spoke S p a n ish o r b o th la n g u a g e s t o them. T hus, w h ile m ost r e s p o n d e n ts spoke S p a n is h to t h e i r p a r e n t s , t h e i r sp o u s e s and c h i l d r e n spoke to them m o s tly i n E n g l i s h . Economic C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s U ndo ubtedly t h e f a c t o r m ost c l o s e l y r e l a t e d to th e g e n e r a l l y low s o c i a l s t a t u s o f th e Mexican i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s h a s been h i s low o c c u p a ti o n a l s t a t u s and h i s p o v e r t y . " In th e m e a su ra b le i n d i c e s o f w e l f a r e , M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s r a n k c l o s e to th e lo w e s t i n com p ariso n w i t h o t h e r m i n o r i t y g r o u p s . "32 McDonagh and R ic h a rd s s t a t e t h a t " h i s econom ic s t a t u s i s p r o b a b l y i n t h e lo w e st q u a r - t i l e i n te rm s o f pay r a t e s and th e low p e r c e n ta g e o f 33 M exicans i n s k i l l e d j o b s and t h e p r o f e s s i o n s . " H i s t o r i c a l l y t h e M e x ica n ’ s p a t t e r n o f employment 32Marden, op. c i t ., p. 143- 33 Edward C. McDonagh and Eugene S. R ic h a r d s , E th n ic R e l a t i o n s i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s (New York: A p p le to n -C e n tu ry C r o f t s , 1 9 5 3 ); P* 199* 121 has l i m i t e d h i s c h a n c e s f o r economic advance and s o c i a l m o b i l i t y . G e n e r a ll y s p e a k in g , as McW illiams n o t e s : Only a p a r t i c u l a r c l a s s o f e m p lo y ers has em ployed Mexican l a b o r i n t h e S o u th w e st; l a r g e - s c a l e i n d u s t r i a l e n t e r p r i s e s ; r a i l r o a d s ; s m e l t e r s ; c o p p e r m in es; s u g a r b e e t r e f i n e r i e s ; f a r m - f a c t o r i e s ; l a r g e f r u i t and v e g e t a b l e e x c h a n g e s. . . . I f a c o n c e rn em ploys M exicans, i t w i l l u s u a l l y be found t h a t th e y d om in ate o r a r e u sed e x c l u s i v e l y In s p e c i f i c ty p e s o f employment r a t h e r th a n b e in g s c a t t e r e d th ro u g h th e p l a n t . 3^ Jo b s o f t e n s t i l l t e n d to be in u n d e s i r a b l e l o c a t i o n s , d e a d -e n d ty p e s and s e a s o n a l o r c a s u a l . A decade ago Deal sum m arized th e Pomona V a lle y s i t u a t i o n as one i n w hich M exican i n d u s t r i a l w o rk e rs were s t i l l p r e d o m in a n tly em ployed In th e ’’h a r d , h o t , and h e a v y ” j o b s . 35 a v i s i t to any l o c a l i n d u s t r i a l p l a n t o r l a r g e - s c a l e c o n s t r u c t i o n job w i l l q u i c k l y v e r i f y t h i s I m p r e s s io n . In th e l a t e 1 9 2 0 's th e seco n d g e n e r a t i o n M exicans had begun t o se e k I n t e g r a t i o n I n t o American s o c i e t y and were c h a n g in g to a p ro p e r ty -o w n in g and b u s i n e s s l e v e l , 36 b u t t h e d e p r e s s i o n u n d o u b te d ly re d u c e d s o c i a l - — - — — J M cW illiam s, op. c i t . , p. 215- 3 5 Q erald V. D e al, "A S tud y o f th e V o c a tio n a l Oppor t u n i t i e s i n Pomona V a lle y f o r M ex ica n -A m erica n s” (unpub l i s h e d M a s t e r 's t h e s i s , C larem ont G ra d u a te S c h o o l, 1951)* p. 56. 36;Emory s . B ogard u s, The M exican in t h e U n ited S t a t e s (Los A n g e le s: U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1 9 2 3 ), p. 51* m o b i l i t y . 37 Also many f i r s t and second g e n e r a t i o n w o rk e rs r e t u r n e d t o Mexico d u r i n g t h i s p e r i o d . I t may be assumed t h a t t h e b e t t e r t r a i n e d and b e t t e r a d j u s t e d p e rs o n s te n d e d t o re m a in i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s . They began to. p r o f i t from t h e r e a l c h an g es coming d u rin g and a f t e r W orld War I I . D u rin g t h e l a s t two d e c a d e s o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r M exicans In n o n - a g r i c u l t u r a l work g r e a t l y Im proved and many crop w o rk e rs fo u n d em ploym ent in d e fe n s e p l a n t s and In th e c o n s t r u c t i o n i n d u s t r y . But when th e war was o v e r and many o f th e I n d u s t r i e s c l o s e d , some o f th e w o rk e rs went b a ck to a g r i c u l t u r e , w here t h e y 'h a d to cope w ith p ro b le m s o f low w ages, and t h e c o m p e ti t io n w i t h b r a c e r o s and " w e tb a c k s ." In th e Pomona V a l le y , some o f t h e e f f e c t s o f th e war p e r i o d w ere p e rm a n e n t. There was an o v e r a l l I n c r e a s e in u n i o n i z a t i o n , h i g h e r wages and r e g u l a r em ploym ent. By t h e e a r l y 1 9 5 0 's i n d i c a t i o n s a p p e a re d t h a t M exican- Am erican w o rk e rs w ere b e in g a c c e p t e d a t h i g h e r and h i g h e r l e v e l s i n t h e s k i l l h i e r a r c h y . At t h a t tim e t h e m a jo r o b s t a c l e s i n th e way o f t h e i r f i n d i n g p e rm a n en t s u i t a b l e 37 W a lte r G o ld sc h m id t, " S o c i a l C la s s and Dynamics o f S t a t u s i n A m e ric a ," American A n t h r o p o l o g i s t , LVII (Decem ber, 1 9 5 5 ), 1 2 1 2 -1 4 . 123 employment were s a id t o be th e p r e j u d i c e s o f e m p lo y e rs who te n d e d to c o n s id e r a l l M exicans a l i k e , and th e f a c t t h a t few M exicans p o s s e s s e d th e t r a i n i n g f o r jo b s r e q u i r i n g s p e c i a l a b i l i t y o r s k i l l s . 3® The p r e s e n t w r i t e r ' s f i n d i n g s a p p ea r to i n d i c a t e c o n ti n u i n g improvement i n th e econom ic and employment s t a t u s o f M exicans and M exican -A m erican s, a t l e a s t i n th e c i t y o f Pomona. T able 12 i n d i c a t e s t h a t th e second g e n e r a t i o n h a s th e h i g h e s t a v e ra g e o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s , and t h a t l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s a re b e t t p r j o f f t h a n th e im m ig ra n ts. Age i s a l s o a f a c t o r , b u t n o t as i m p o r t a n t as g e n e r a t i o n . T ab le 13 r e v e a l s t h a t t h e o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s o f p e r s o n s u n d e r 40 i s somewhat b e t t e r th an t h a t o f th o se 40 an d o v e r. The u n d e r ly in g f a c t o r i n b o th c a s e s i s u n d o u b ted ly a c u l t u r a l one in v o lv in g s c h o o lin g and t h e u se o f th e E n g l i s h la n g u a g e . In T able 14 i s seen th e much low er a v e ra g e o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s o f th o s e s p e a k in g S panish d u r in g t h e i n t e r v i e w . The w r i t e r c o u ld f i n d no r e l a t i o n s h i p b e tw ee n e t h n i c s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n and o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y . The p e r c e n t a g e o f p e rs o n s i n e a c h o c c u p a t i o n a l c a te g o r y i d e n t i f y i n g as "S panish " was w h ite c o l l a r 20 .0; s k i l l e d , 3&Deal, op. c i t ., p . 100. TABLE 12 / OCCUPATION AND GENERATION OP RESPONDENTS G enera t i o n O ccupation T o ta l R e l i e f and L ab o rers Semi - S k i l l e d S k i l l e d White C o lla r Num- Per b e r c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t F i r s t 19 5 9 .4 5 15-6 5 15 .6 3 9 .4 32 10 0 .0 Second 25 29.1 28 32 .6 19 22.1 14 1 6 .3 86 100.1 L a te r 12 4 1 .4 4 1 3 .8 10 34.5 3 10 .3 29 10 0 .0 T o ta l 56 38.1 37 2 5 .2 34 23.1 20 13.6 147 10 0.0 c h i squ are = 13. 86 P = .04 C = . 294 i — 1 ro 4 = - TABLE 13 AGE AND OCCUPATION OP RESPONDENTS Age O ccupation Sub t o t a l Housewives T o ta l R e l i e f and L ab o rers Semi- S k i l l e d S k i l l e d White C o lla r Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per cen t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 20-39 12 23.5 16 31 .4 13 25.5 10 19 .6 51 34 4 0 .0 85 10 0.0 40-89 18 4 5 .0 10 2 5 .0 8 2 0 .0 4 1 0 .0 4o 22 35.5 62 10 0 .0 T o ta l 30 33-0 26 2 8.6 21 23.1 14 15 .4 91 56 38.1 147 100.0 c h i sq uare = 4.6 5 P = .04 C = .221 125 TABLE 14 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND OCCUPATION OF RESPONDENTS Language P r e f e r ence R e l i e f and L ab o rers Semi - S k i l l e d S k i l l e d White C o lla r T o ta l Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Spanish 26 60.5 9 2 0 .9 7 1 6 .3 1 2 .3 43 10 0 .0 E n g lis h 30 2 8 .8 28 26.9 27 2 6 .0 19 18 .3 104 10 0.0 T o ta l 36 38.1 37 2 5 .2 34 23.1 20 13*6 147 10 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 1 5 - 34 p = < .01 C = .307 126 127 1 4 .7 ; s e m i - s k i l l e d , 1 8 .9 ; l a b o r e r s , 1 2 .8 ; p e rs o n s on r e l i e f , 2 2 .2 . P e rh ap s t h e m ost s t r i k i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f th e p r e s e n t employment p a t t e r n as c o n t r a s t e d w ith t h a t o f two o r t h r e e d e c a d e s ago h a s b een t h e s t r o n g move away from a g r i c u l t u r a l and r a i l r o a d em ploym ent. Only some o f th e o l d e r p e o p le have rem ain ed i n a g r i c u l t u r a l f i e l d w ork, t h e o n ly k in d o f work w ith w hich t h e y w ere f a m i l i a r . T h is t r e n d c o u ld have been f o r e s e e n i n a s u rv e y c o n d u c te d a t Pom ona's Frem ont J u n i o r High Sch ool i n 1941, in w h ic h 60 p e r c e n t o f t h e Mexican p u p i l s ' f a t h e r s were em ployed i n a g r i c u l t u r a l work b u t o n l y 14 p e r c e n t o f th e p u p i l s i n t e n d e d to do t h e same k i n d o f w o r k .39 Two decad es l a t e r , i n th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple o n ly a h a n d f u l o f th e g a i n f u l l y em ployed w ere engaged i n a g r i c u l t u r a l work; n am ely 5 -7 p e r c e n t o f a l l w o rk e rs i n th e h o u s e h o ld s c o n t a c t e d . C o n s t r u c t i o n w ork, b e c a u se o f th e Los A ngeles a r e a ' s r a p i d l y e x p a n d in g h o u s in g , fre e w a y s and com m ercial p l a n t s , i s a m a jo r l o c a l i n d u s t r y . I t now form s one o f t h e m ost v i t a l s o u r c e s o f employment f o r Pom ona's M exicans; m ost o f th o s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n work a r e i n th e common 39]3eard, op. c i t . , p . 57* 128 l a b o r e r c a t e g o r y . T h e re h a s b e e n , h o w e v e r, c o n s i d e r a b l e i m o b i l i t y up t h e s k i l l h i e r a r c h y , e v e n to t h e c o n t r a c t o r l e v e l . The r e l a t i v e l y s m a ll num ber o f M exicans i n c l e r i c a l p o s i t i o n s a p p e a r s t o be due n o t so much to d i s c r i m i n a t i o n a s to t h e l a c k o f p r o p e r l y q u a l i f i e d a p p l i c a n t s . ^ -0 A s m a l l num ber o f M exicans i n Pomona h av e t h e i r own b u s i n e s s e s , a n d many o f them r r e m a r g i n a l . The b u s i n e s s e s a r e o f v a r i o u s t y p e s , b u t m ost a r e l o c a t e d i n t h e c o l o n i a a r e a and c a t e r t o M ex ican c l i e n t e l e . In t h e Pomona a r e a M exican p r o f e s s i o n a l s a r e c o n s p i c u o u s b y t h e i r v i r t u a l a b s e n c e . In 1951 D eal c o u l d f in d - no S p a n is h - s u r n a m e p r o f e s s i o n a l s l i s t e d i n t h e c l a s s i f i e d s e c t i o n o f t h e t e l e p h o n e d i r e c t o r y a l t h o u g h t h e r e w e re some p e r s o n s i n t h e C h r i s t i a n m i n i s t r y and i n t h e t e a c h i n g p r o f e s s i o n a t t h a t t l m e . ^ l Ten y e a r s l a t e r , t h e same s i t u a t i o n p r e v a i l s , w i t h no Pomona M ex ica n -A m erica n e m p lo y e d i n a n y o f t h e major p r o f e s s i o n s a s v e r i f i e d by a c a r e f u l c h e c k o f t e l e p h o n e and c i t y d i r e c t o r i e s . T h e re a r e , h ow ev er, m i n i s t e r s ( a l l i n c h a r g e o f M exican c h u r c h e s ) , t e a c h e r s (some i n p r e d o m i n a n t l y M exican s c h o o l s , ^ ° D e a l, o p . c i t ., p. 86. 4 l Ibid., pp. 90-91- 129 some n o t ; none above th e h i g h sc h o o l l e v e l ) and one c h i r o p r a c t o r . In 1963 t h e r e were I n Pomona no la w y e r s , m e d ic a l d o c to r s , d e n t i s t s , p h a r m a c i s t s , o r c o l l e g e p r o f e s s o r s o f Mexican d e s c e n t . Employment o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r M exicans i n t h e Pomona V a lle y a re now, i n c o n t r a s t t o M cW illiam s' g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t , o f f e r e d by a l a r g e v a r i e t y o f e m p lo y ers; a t o t a l o f 105 d i f f e r e n t e m p lo y e rs f o r t h e 17^ em ployed p e r sons i n t h e sample h o u s e h o l d s . Only 22 em p loyers h i r e d more t h a n one M exlcan-A m erican p e rs o n (from th e sample h o u s e h o l d s ) . The l a r g e s t s i n g l e e m p lo y e r has seven em ployees from t h e s e h o u s e h o ld s . T a b le 15 p r e s e n t s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f th e w r i t e r ’ s l a b o r f o r c e by o c c u p a tio n a n d i n d u s t r y . T h is t a b l e ' c l e a r l y d e m o n s tr a te s how a g r i c u l t u r e h as d e c r e a s e d i n im p o rta n c e as an em p lo y er o f Pom ona's M exicans; o n l y 5 -7 p e r c e n t a r e so em ployed. With one e x c e p t i o n (a r a n c h hand) a l l w ere u n s k i l l e d and s e m i s k i l l e d w o rk e rs em ployed by f r u i t p a c k in g h o u s e s , and o f t h e s e o n ly o n e was a f r u i t p i c k e r . Manu f a c t u r i n g a c c o u n te d f o r 2 9 .9 p e r c e n t o f th e t o t a l employed p e r s o n s . The c o n s t r u c t i o n I n d u s t r y employed 4 2M cW illiams, op. c i t ., p. 215- TABLE 15 OCCUPATION AND INDUSTRY OP ALL EMPLOYED PERSONS IN SAMPLE HOUSEHOLDS O ccupation L a b o re rs S e m i- S k ille d S k i l l e d White C o l la r T o ta l . I n d u s t r y Num- Per b e r c e n t Num- P er Num- Per b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num- Per b e r c e n t A g r ic u ltu r e 4 4 0 .0 6 6 0 .0 10 1 0 0 .0 C o n s tr u c tio n 18 5 6 .2 5 15-6 9 28.1 - - 32 9 9 .9 Manufa c t u r i n g U t i l i t i e s , T r a n s p o r t a ti o n and Communi 13 2 5 .0 24 4 6 .2 11 21.1 4 7 .7 52 1 0 0 .0 c a t io n Trade and 3 6 0 .0 2 4 0 .0 5 10 0 .0 F i n a n c i a l S e rv ic e 2 8 .7 4 1 7 .4 5 21.7 12 5 2 .2 23 10 0 .0 E s ta b lis h m e n ts 4 1 5 .4 6 23.1 8 3 0 .8 8 3 0 .8 26 100.1 P r i v a t e S e rv ic e 5 7 1 .4 1 1 4 .3 1 1 4 .3 — 7 10 0 .0 Government 1 5 -3 7 3 6 .8 4 21.1 7 3 6 .8 19 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 50 2 8 .7 53 3 0.5 38 2 1 .8 33 19-0 174 1 0 0 .0 131 1 8 .4 p e r c e n t o f a l l em ployed p e r s o n s . The m a j o r i t y o f t h e s e (5 6 .2 p e r c e n t ) w ere u n s k i l l e d l a b o r e r s . O c c u p a tio n and O th er C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e sp o n d e n ts T ab le 15 s e t s f o r t h d a ta on th e o c c u p a ti o n a l c l a s s i f i c a t i o n f o r a l l p e r s o n s g a i n f u l l y em ployed i n t h e h o u s e h o ld s i n w hich an i n t e r v i e w was o b t a i n e d . In r e l a t in g o c c u p a ti o n t o t h e o t h e r v a r i a b l e s in t h e re m a in d e r o f t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n , how ever, o n ly th e o c c u p a tio n s o f th e r e s p o n d e n t s th e m s e lv e s have been c o n s i d e r e d . In c a s e s where s t a t u s c o n s i d e r a t i o n s a r e d i s c u s s e d , h o u sew iv es have b een c l a s s i f i e d by th e o c c u p a ti o n o f t h e head o f th e h o u s e h o ld . The a s su m p tio n h e r e i s t h a t i n o u r s o c i e t y women's c l a s s p o s i t i o n d e r i v e s c h i e f l y from t h a t o f t h e i r h u sb a n d s o r f a t h e r s . ^3 In a s s i g n i n g s p e c i f i c o c c u p a tio n s to eac h o f t h e s i x m a jo r o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r i e s th e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n u se d by th e U n ite d S t a t e s B ureau o f t h e Census h a s g e n e r a l l y ^ R i c h a r d C e n te r s , The P sy ch o lo g y o f S o c ia l C l a s s e s ( P r i n c e t o n : P r i n c e t o n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 4 9 ), p . 35- 132 b e e n f o l l o w e d , w i t h a few e x c e p t i o n s . ^ The m a j o r d e v i a t i o n h a s b e e n t h e e l i m i n a t i o n o f t h e c a t e g o r i e s " S e r v i c e W o r k e r s " a n d " P r i v a t e H o u s e h o l d W o r k e r s , " i n a s m u c h a s t h e s e do n o t c o n s t i t u t e s p e c i f i c l e v e l s i n t h e h i e r a r c h y o f s k i l l s . T he s e r v i c e an d h o u s e h o l d o c c u p a t i o n s h a v e b e e n d i s t r i b u t e d , t h e r e f o r e , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e l e v e l o f s k i l l i n v o l v e d . T h u s , f o r e x a m p l e , j a n i t o r s a n d d i s h w a s h e r s h a v e b e e n c l a s s i f i e d a s " L a b o r e r s " ; n u r s e ' s a i d e s a n d h o u s e k e e p e r s a s " S e m i - S k i l l e d " a n d v o c a t i o n a l n u r s e s and c o o k s a s " S k i l l e d . " The w r i t e r e l i m i n a t e d t h e t e c h n i c a l o c c u p a t i o n s ( h e l d by o n l y two p e r s o n s i n t h e h o u s e h o l d s c o n t a c t e d ) i n t h e B u r e a u o f t h e C e n s u s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n b y p l a c i n g th em w i t h t h e c l e r i c a l a n d s a l e s o c c u p a t i o n s t o w h i c h t h e y a r e m ore c l o s e l y a l l i e d . The w r i t e r ' s c a t e g o r y " L a b o r e r s " i n c l u d e s fa rm l a b o r e r s , a n d h i s c a t e g o r y " P r o p r i e t o r s a n d M a n a g e r s " i n c l u d e s f a r m e r s and f a r m m a n a g e r s . W ith t h e e x c e p t i o n s n o t e d , t h e w r i t e r ' s c a t e g o r y " S e m i - S k i l l e d " i n c l u d e s " O p e r a t i v e s " i n t h e C e n s u s B u r e a u c l a s s i f i c a t i o n , w h i l e " S k i l l e d " i s sy n o n y m o u s w i t h " C r a f t s m e n a n d F o r e m e n ." B e c a u s e o f t h e ^ T h e r e s e a r c h e r ' s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n i s p r e s e n t e d Ln_. A p p e n d ix C. 133 s m a ll num bers i n v o lv e d and th e c lo s e resem b lan c e on m ost v a r i a b l e s , th e c a t e g o r i e s " C l e r i c a l and S a l e s , " " P r o p r i e t o r s and M anagers" and " P r o f e s s i o n a l s " have been com b in e d i n t o a s i n g l e "W hite C o l la r " c a te g o r y i n th e t a b l e s i n t h i s r e p o r t . Of a l l r e s p o n d e n ts o t h e r th a n h o u se w iv e s , 89*0 p e r c e n t were em ployed, w ith o n ly 6 .6 p e r c e n t unem ployed and 4 .4 p e r c e n t r e t i r e d . A ll w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e rs w ere em ployed. Unemployed p e rs o n s were m ost f r e q u e n t among th e u n s k i l l e d l a b o r e r s (1 3 -3 p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l ) . The v a r i a b l e o t h e r th a n o c c u p a tio n p o s s i b l y m ost c l e a r l y r e l a t e d to s t a t u s c o n s i d e r a t i o n s i s e d u c a t i o n . The lo w e s t median num ber o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g f o r r e s p o n d e n t s i n t h e w r i t e r ' s sam ple was f o r l a b o r e r s (8.2), w h ile t h e h i g h e s t was f o r p r o f e s s i o n a l s (17*0). The n e x t h i g h e s t (1 2 .2 y e a r s ) was f o r s a l e s , c l e r i c a l and t e c h n i c a l w o rk e rs . C o n tra ry t o e x p e c t a t i o n s , th e m edian number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g f o r s e m i - s k i l l e d w ork ers (1 0 .5 ) was h i g h e r t h a n t h a t f o r s k i l l e d (9*7) which i n t u r n was h i g h e r t h a n t h a t f o r t h e m anagers and p r o p r i e t o r s (8.5)* When c a t e g o r i e s a re com bined as i n T able 16, th e c h i s q u a r e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . TABLE 16 SCHOOLING AND OCCUPATION OP RESPONDENTS Years o f S chooling O ccupation Sub t o t a l Housewives T o ta l R e l i e f and L ab o rer s Semi- S k i l l e d S k i l l e d White C o lla r Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t 0-8 16 48.5 7 2 1 .2 7 2 1 .2 3 9-1 33 26 44.1 59 100 .0 9-11 11 35-5 9 2 9 .0 9 2 9 .0 2 6 .5 31 16 3 4 .0 47 1 0 0.0 12 o r More 3 11.1 10 37-0 5 18.5 9 33-3 27 14 34.1 4 l 9 9 .9 T o ta l 30 3 3 .0 2 6 . 2 8 .6 21 23.1 14 15-4 91 56 38.1 147 100.1 Median 8 .2 - - 10.5 - - 9-7 — 1 2 .0 — 8.9 9-4 - - c h i sq u a re = 16.3 0 P 02 C = .390 i — 1 u> 4^ 135 The w r i t e r o b t a i n e d from e a c h r e s p o n d e n t an e s t i m a t e o f t o t a l f a m i ly incom e. A lth o u g h t h e r e i s a d i r e c t r e l a t i o n s h i p b etw een o c c u p a ti o n and f a m i l y incom e, th e l a t t e r v a r i a b l e i s a l s o d e p e n d e n t upon t h e num ber o f b r e a d w in n e r s i n t h e f a m i ly . As an i n d e x o f econom ic and s o c i a l p o s i t i o n , t o t a l f a m i ly income m ost a l s o be view ed i n r e l a t i o n to f a m i ly s i z e . The l a r g e r f a m i l i e s e n jo y th e h i g h e r in c o m e s: a m edian a n n u a l incom e o f $6 ,1 9 2 f o r f a m i l i e s w ith f i v e o r more m em bers. For f a m i l i e s w ith fe w e r th a n f i v e members th e m ed ian a n n u a l incom e d ro pped t o $5*357- However, l a r g e r f a m i l i e s have a s m a l l e r p e r c a p i t a f a m i ly incom e: $ 1 ,6 4 4 f o r f a m i l i e s w ith f o u r o r few er members, b u t o n l y $ 1 ,0 4 4 f o r f a m i l i e s w ith f i v e o r more members l i v i n g i n t h e same h o u s e h o ld . The l a r g e r t h e number o f b re a d w in n e r s t h e h i g h e r i s th e p o t e n t i a l f a m i ly incom e. For f a m i l i e s w i t h one b r e a d w in n e r t h e m edian i s $5*600; w ith two b r e a d w in n e r s $7*75°; and f o r f a m i l i e s w ith t h r e e o r more b r e a d w in n e r s $ 8 ,0 0 0 p e r y e a r . T a b le 17 shows t h a t t o t a l f a m i l y income i s a s s o c i a te d w i t h t h e o c c u p a ti o n o f th e h e a d o f th e h o u s e h o l d : th e h i g h e r r a n k i n g t h e o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y , th e h i g h e r th e I TABLE 17 OCCUPATION OP HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AND INCOME O ccupation T o ta l Annual Fam ily Income T o ta l Median Under $4,000 $ 4 ,0 0 0 - $5,999 $6 , 000- $7,939 $8,0 0 0 o r Over Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t R e l i e f 6 75-0 2 ■ 2 5 .0 8 1 0 0 .0 $1,667 L ab o re rs 17 37-0 15 32.6 10 21.7 4 8.7 46 1 0 0 .0 4,857 S e m i-S k ille d 4 1 1 .4 14 4 0 .0 11 31.4 6 17.1 35 9 9 .9 5 ,9 3 8 S k i l l e d 3 9 .4 11 3 4 .4 11 34.4 7 2 1 .9 32 101.1 6 ,2 5 0 White C o lla r 2 12 .5 1 6 .2 5 31.2 8 5 0 .0 16 9 9 .9 8,000 T o ta l 32 2 3 .4 43 3 1 .4 37 2 7 .0 25 i b . 2 137 10 0.0 $5,704 c h i sq uare = 32..91 F 1 = < .01 C = .440 0 0 cr\ 137 incom e; $ 1 ,6 6 7 f o r h e a d s o f h o u s e h o ld on r e l i e f , $ 4 ,8 5 7 f o r l a b o r e r s , $5 ;9 3 8 f o r s e m i - s k i l l e d w o r k e r s , $6 ,2 5 0 f o r s k i l l e d w o rk e r s , and $ 8 ,0 0 0 f o r w h ite c o l l a r w o r k e r s . The same r e l a t i o n s h i p e x i s t s betw een o c c u p a ti o n and p e r c a p i t a f a m i l y incom e, e x c e p t t h a t f a m i l i e s w ith a s k i l l e d w o rk e r a s t h e h e ad o f t h e h o u s e h o ld had a lo w e r p e r c a p i t a income ($1 , 5 3 8 ) th a n t h e f a m i l i e s w ith a s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk e r a t th e h e a d o f th e h o u s e h o ld ( $ 1 ,7 0 8 ) . T h is d i s c r e p a n c y i s e x p l a i n e d by th e c o m p a r a tiv e ly l a r g e r f a m i l i e s o f th e s k i l l e d w o rk e rs . T o ta l f a m i ly income i s a l s o a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s e v e r a l v a r i a b l e s i n d i c a t i v e o f c u l t u r a l p o s i t i o n . The se co n d g e n e r a t i o n h as t h e h i g h e s t m edian incom e $ 6 ,0 9 4 , t h e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n th e l o w e s t , $ 4 ,0 0 0 , a s shown i n T a b le 18. T a b le 19 d e m o n s tr a te s t h a t th e y o u n g e r th e age c a t e g o r y , t h e h i g h e r i s t h e m edian incom e, e x c e p t f o r age 80- 8 9 * w hich c o n t a i n s o n ly one c a s e . T a b le 20 i n d i c a t e s t h a t r e s p o n d e n t s s p e a k in g S p a n ish d u r i n g t h e i n t e r v i e w had a m edian incom e o f $4,667* th o s e s p e a k in g E n g l i s h , o f $ 6 ,0 6 8 . B ecause s c h o o l in g and o c c u p a ti o n a r e c o r r e l a t e d w i t h e a c h o t h e r and t h e l a t t e r w i t h incom e, i t i s u n d e r s t a n d a b l e t h a t s c h o o l in g and incom e would be a s s o c i a t e d as TABLE 18 GENERATION AND INCOME OP RESPONDENTS T o ta l Annual Fam ily Income Under $4,000 $ 4,00 0- _ $5,999 _ _ $6 , 000- $7,999 $8,000 o r Over T o ta l Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- P er Num- Per G e n e ra tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Median F i r s t 15 5 0 .0 7 23.3 4 1 3 .3 4 1 3 .3 30 9 9 .9 $4,000 Second 14 17*3 25 30 .9 22 27 .2 20 24.7 81 100.1 6,094 L a te r 3 1 1 .5 11 4 2 .3 11 4 2 .3 1 3 .8 26 99-9 5 ,8 0 0 T o ta l 32 2 3 .4 43 3 1 .4 37 27 .0 25 1 8 .2 137 10 0 .0 $5,704 c h i sq u a re 1 1 ro U J • 05 P = < . 01 C = .379 O O co TABLE 19 AGE AND INCOME OF RESPONDENTS Age T o ta l Annual Fam ily Income T o ta l Median Under $4,000 $4,000- $5,999 $6 , 000- .. $7., 999 . $8,000 o r Over Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 20-29 3 9.1 11 33-3 13 39.4 6 1 8 .2 33 100.0 $6,2 5 0 30-39 5 1 0.4 17 35-4 13 2 7 .1 13 27 . I 48 100.0 6,1 8 2 40-49 3 13 .6 11 5 0 .0 6 27-3 2 9 .1 22 100.0 5,571 50-59 12 63-2 1 5 .3 5 26 .3 1 5 -3 19 100.1 3,376 60-69 5 5 0 .0 2 2 0.0 — 3 3 0 .0 10 100.0 3,000 70-79 4 100 .0 4 10 0 .0 2,667 80-89 — - - 1 100.0 1 10 0.0 4 ,5 0 0 T o ta l 32 2 3 .4 43 3 1 .4 37 2 7 .0 25 1 8 .2 137 100.0 5,704 c h i sq u a re = 43.45 p - < .01 c = .491 139 TABLE 20 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND INCOME OF RESPONDENTS Language T o ta l Annual Fam ily Income T o ta l Median Under $4,000 ■ $ 4,0 00- $5,999 $6 , 000- $7,999 $8,000 o r Over Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t Num- Per b e r cen t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t S panish 18 4 5 .0 10 2 5 .0 7 17-5 5 12.5 40 10 0.0 $4,667 E n g lis h 14 1 4 .4 33 34 .0 30 30.9 20 20.6 97 99 .9 6,06 8 T o ta l 32 23 .4 43 31.4 37 27.0 25 1 8 .2 137 10 0.0 5,70 4 c h i square = 15- 14 P = < .01 C = .315 H O 141 shown i n T ab le 21. R e sp o n d e n ts w ith 8 o r fe w e r y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g had a m edian income o f $4,357* th o s e w ith 9 to 11 y e a r s , $5 .,5 8 3 * and th o s e w ith a t l e a s t 1 2 , $6 , 3 7 5 . V o lu n ta r y A s s o c ia t io n s The commonest ty p e o f o r g a n i z a t i o n a l a f f i l i a t i o n among th e M exicans o f Pomona i s w ith a c h u rc h , w hich was d e f i n e d by th e w r i t e r as e i t h e r c h u rc h m em bership o r c u s tom ary a tte n d a n c e a t a p a r t i c u l a r c h u rc h . Broom and Shevky a s s e r t t h a t " th e c h u rc h i s th e p r i n c i p a l agency o f c u l t u r a l c o n s e r v a t i o n f o r M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s and r e i n f o r c e s th e s e p a r a t e n e s s o f t h e g r o u p . "^5 Pomona g e n e r a l l y f o llo w s th e p a t t e r n o f s e g r e g a t e d c h u rc h e s , a lth o u g h i t c a n n o t be d e n ie d t h a t a c e r t a i n amount o f th e s e g r e g a t i o n i s v o l u n t a r y . I t can h a r d l y be s a i d t h a t s e g r e g a t i o n e x i s t s a t a l l i n Pom ona's C a th o lic c h u rc h e s , b u t o f th e P r o t e s t a n t s i n th e sam ple (1 8 ), c o n s t i t u t i n g 1 2 .2 p e r c e n t o f th e t o t a l , o n ly two b e lo n g e d t o an Anglo c h u rc h . In Pomona th e v a s t m a j o r i t y a t t e n d C a th o l i c c h u rc h e s , e s p e c i a l l y th e S p a n is h - la n g u a g e S acred 4s -'Broom and Shevky, l o c . c i t . , p . 157* TABLE 21 SCHOOLING AND INCOME OP RESPONDENTS Years of Schooling Total Annual Family Income Total Median Under $4,000 $4,000- &5 j .999 _ $6,000- $7,999 $8,000 or Over Num ber Per cent Num ber Per cent Num- Per ber cent Num ber Per cent Num ber Per cent 0-8 20 36.4 16 29.1 10 18.2 9 16.4 55 100.1 $4,357 9-11 9 20.9 15 34.8 11 25.6 8 18.6 43 99-9 5,583 12 or More 3 7-7 12 30.8 16 41.0 8 20.5 39 100.0 6,375 Total 32 23-4 43 31.4 37 27.0 25 18.2 137 100.0 5,704 chi square = 12. 91 P .04 C = .294 142 143 H e art C a th o lic Church l o c a t e d i n t h e Mexican d i s t r i c t . More th a n h a l f o f th e w r i t e r ’ s sam ple (33 men and 53 women) a t t e n d S a c re d H e a rt. Most o f th e r e s t o f th e C a t h o l i c s , 8 men and 15 women, a t t e n d S t. J o s e p h 's C a th o lic Church, th e l a r g e s t p a r i s h i n Pomona, and w hich i s o verw h elm in g ly Anglo i n m em bership. R esp on dents r e p o r t e d b e lo n g in g to a t o t a l o f 14 d i f f e r e n t c lu b s o r g ro u p s (7 C a th o lic and 7 P r o t e s t a n t ) a t t h e i r c h u rc h . Pom ona's Mexican workingmen have b een i n t e g r a t e d i n t o a wide v a r i e t y o f l a b o r u n io n l o c a l s o f Pomona and n e a rb y c i t i e s . In f a c t , n e x t to c h u rc h m em bership, a f f i l i a t i o n w i t h l a b o r u n io n s was th e m ost common k in d among th e w r i t e r ' s r e s p o n d e n t s : 32 men and 1 woman. R e sp o n d en ts b e lo n g e d t o 21 l o c a l s o f 13 d i f f e r e n t t r a d e u n io n s . A t o t a l o f 23 m em berships were h e ld i n 7 d i f f e r e n t f r a t e r n a l o r g a n i z a t i o n s . Of t h e s e , o n ly t h r e e were non- M exican: two r e s p o n d e n ts b e lo n g e d to th e E lk s , one to th e R o s ic r u c l a n o r d e r , and one b e lo n g e d to th e K nig h ts o f Columbus. . On. t h e oJther.-hand, o n ly one re s p o n d e n t r e p o r t e d m em bership i n any M exlcan-A m erican c i v i c o r g a n i z a t i o n , i n t h i s c a s e th e League o f U n ite d L a t i n American C i t i z e n s . 144 Of t h e w r i t e r ' s sam ple, 10 men and 24 women r e p o r t e d b e lo n g in g to t h e P a r e n t- T e a c h e r s A s s o c i a t i o n a t t h e s c h o o ls a t t e n d e d by t h e i r c h i l d r e n . In a d d i t i o n , 12 r e s p o n d e n ts r e p o r t e d one m em bership i n e a c h o f 12 d i f f e r e n t o r g a n i z a t i o n s w hich can be b r o a d l y d e f i n e d a s c i v i c . Only 8 r e s p o n d e n ts r e p o r t e d b e lo n g in g to an o r g a n i z a t i o n r e l a t e d t o t h e i r p r o f e s s i o n o r o c c u p a ti o n ( o t h e r th a n a l a b o r u n i o n ) . These 8 r e s p o n d e n ts h e ld 11 m em berships I n su ch o r g a n i z a t i o n s . O th e r th a n c h u rc h , c i v i c , u n io n and o t h e r o c c u p a t i o n a l o r g a n i z a t i o n s , members o f t h e w r i t e r ' s sample b e lo n g e d to few o t h e r o r g a n i z a t i o n s . The o n l y v e t e r a n s ' o r g a n i z a t i o n r e p r e s e n t e d was t h e Am erican L e g io n , w ith 3 members. T here were two M exican-A m erican s o c i a l c l u b s , e a c h w ith one member from t h e sam ple. I t may be c o n c lu d e d t h a t th e M exicans In t h e w r i t e r ' s sam ple w ere n o t c o n s p ic u o u s i n Anglo o r g a n i z a t i o n s i n w hich new t e c h n i q u e s f o r m o b i l i t y and f u r t h e r a c c u l t u r a t i o n c o u ld be a c q u i r e d . More p e r s o n s b e lo n g e d t o a c h u rc h th a n t o any o t h e r ty p e o f o r g a n i z a t i o n : 87*1 p e r c e n t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s . Of th e s e 7 8 .1 p e r c e n t a t t e n d e d M exican c h u rc h e s and 2 1 .9 a t t e n d e d Anglo c h u rc h e s . The n e x t m ost common ty p e o f m em bership was i n c i v i c o r g a n i z a t i o n s : 29.2 p e r cen t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s . Of t h e s e , however, 71*5 p er c e n t b e lo n g e d to t h e i r l o c a l P a r e n t - T e a c h e r s A s s o c i a t i o n . O f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s 2 2 .4 p e r c e n t belonged t o l a b o r u n i o n s . To f r a t e r n a l g ro u p s b e lo n g e d 1 2 .2 p e r c e n t , o f whom 77 .8 p e r c e n t b e lo n g e d t o M exican lo d g e s , and t o church g ro u p s , 1 0 .9 p e r c e n t , o f whom 7 5 -0 p e r c e n t b e lo n g e d t o Mexican c h u rc h g r o u p s . The two l e a s t i m p o r t a n t c a t e g o r i e s were th o s e o f p r o f e s s i o n a l , b u s i n e s s and e m p lo y e e s' a s s o c i a t i o n s (5 -4 p e r c e n t ) an d s o c i a l c l u b s , o n ly 1 . 4 p e r c e n t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s . I n th e a b se n c e o f e x te n s iv e o r g a n i z a t i o n a l a f f i l i a t i o n s i t a p p e a r s t h a t s o c i a l c o n ta c t s an d i n t e r a c t i o n a r e f a i r l y w e l l l i m i t e d t o th e jo b , the c h u r c h , t h e n e ig h b o r hood, and th e k i n s h i p g r o u p . Of th e t o t a l sam ple only 7*5 p e r c e n t w ere a f f i l i a t e d w i t h no o r g a n i z a t i o n w h a ts o e v e r , w h ile f o r 33-3 p e r c e n t o f th e sample t h e only m em bership r e p o r t e d was c h u rc h m em bership and f o r a n o th e r 1 . 4 p e r c e n t o f t h e sam ple o n ly a u n io n m em bership. An a d d i t i o n a l 1 2 . 2 p e r c e n t r e p o r t e d b o t h c h u rc h and u n i o n m em bership (bo th e s s e n t i a l l y a s c r i b e d s t a t u s e s ) , but no. o t h e r o r g a n i z a t i o n a f f i l i a t i o n s . Only 67 r e s p o n d e n ts (27 men and 4 0 women), 146 c o n s t i t u t i n g 4 5 .6 p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l w ere a f f i l i a t e d w i t h one o r more o r g a n i z a t i o n s , o t h e r t h a n a c h u rc h o r a l a b o r u n io n . L e a d e r s h ip J u d g in g from th e m eager r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f M exican- A m ericans i n o r g a n i z a t i o n s , i t would a p p e a r t h a t o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r p r a c t i c e i n l e a d e r s h i p a r e m in im a l. Tuck n o t e d t h a t i n San B e r n a r d in o " t h e f i v e o r s i x acknow ledged l e a d e r s h o ld t h e i r p o s i t i o n by v i r t u e o f t h e f a c t t h a t t h e y a r e a b l e t o work i n a w id e r , b o l d e r f a s h i o n f o r l a r a z a ." T h is i s t h e g ro u p w hich h a s a s s i m i l a t e d Am erican ways and w h ic h h a s d e v e lo p e d e x t e n s i v e Anglo c o n t a c t s . ^6 In an a t t e m p t t o i d e n t i f y th e l e a d e r s o f Pom ona's M exican p o p u l a t i o n , e a c h member o f th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple was a sk e d th e q u e s t i o n , "Who w ould you sa y a re th e m ost im p o r t a n t p e r s o n s o f M exican o r i g i n h e r e i n Pomona?" A t o t a l o f 27 d i f f e r e n t " i m p o r t a n t p e o p le " w ere named; o n ly one d id n o t have a w h ite c o l l a r o c c u p a t i o n . In a d d i t i o n , ^ R u t h D. Tuck, Not w i t h th e F i s t (New Y ork; H ar- c o u r t , B race and C o ., 1 9 4 6 ), pp . 1 3 7 -1 3 8 . r e s p o n d e n ts named 8 f a m i l i e s o r lin e a g e s ( i . e . , f a m ily nam es) as b e in g among th e " im p o rta n t p e o p l e ." In a l l c a s e s th e s e f a m i l i e s had been among th e f i r s t p e o p le o f Mexican d e s c e n t to s e t t l e in th e Pomona V a lle y . Only 13 p e rs o n s were m en tio n ed more th a n o nce. The l a t t e r i n c lu d e d 4 s c h o o l t e a c h e r s , 3 b u sin e ssm e n , and 1 eac h o f th e f o l lo w in g : c h i r o p r a c t o r , p o l i c e o f f i c e r , p u b l i s h e r , m i n i s t e r , m i l l w r i g h t and r e a l e s t a t e b r o k e r . The o c cu p a t i o n s o f p e r s o n s m en tio n ed o n ly once w e re: 4 h o u se w iv es, 3 p o l i c e o f f i c e r s and 1 each o f th e f o llo w in g o c c u p a ti o n s : b u i l d i n g c o n t r a c t o r , m i n i s t e r , newspaperm an, r e s t a u r a n t owner, t e a c h e r , t i l e c o n t r a c t o r , and u n io n s e c r e t a r y . Prom r e s p o n d e n t s ’ answ ers and h i s s tu d y o f th e community, th e w r i t e r was a b le to i d e n t i f y o n ly t h r e e l e a d e r s who c o u ld r e a s o n a b l y be c a l l e d o u t s t a n d i n g . T h is group i n c l u d e s Mr. A and Mr. B, who w ith t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e " v o te s " o f 32 and 25 were f a r ahead o f t h e i r n e a r e s t com p e t i t o r , Mr. C w ith o n ly 14. T here i s l i t t l e q u e s t io n t h a t Mr. A and Mr. B a r e th e b e s t known and m ost p ro m in e n t members, o f Pom ona's M exican-A m erican community. The Pomona P r o g r e s s - B u l l e t i n f r e q u e n t l y c a r r i e s news a b o u t th e a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e s e two men, p a r t i c u l a r l y Mr. B. The 148 l a t t e r f i r s t g a in e d fame f o r h i s a c t i v i t i e s i n b e h a l f o f M exican-A m erican y o u th , b u t i n r e c e n t y e a r s h a s been p ro m in e n t i n Anglo s e r v i c e c lu b s and b u s in e s s m e n 's g ro u p s . Mr. A, on th e o t h e r hand, a s c h o o l t e a c h e r and r a d i o an n o u n c e r, i s much more o r i e n t e d , as a l e a d e r , to th e M exican-A m erican community. Mr. C, s t r o n g l y o r i e n t e d to w a rd th e M exican community, had been a m i l i t a n t f i g h t e r f o r c i v i l r i g h t s f o r M exicans, s c o r i n g some n o t a b l e s u c c e s s e s on t h e l o c a l sc en e some y e a r s ago. D uring th e p a s t few y e a r s , how ever, he seems to have been more o r l e s s i n a c t i v e . The w r i t e r was i n t e r e s t e d i n knowing why i n d i v i d u a l s had been n o m in ated as " im p o r ta n t" by th e i n t e r v i e w e e s . R e sp o n d e n ts w ere a sk e d why th e y c o n s id e r e d such i n d i v i d u a l s i m p o r t a n t . Answers v a r i e d g r e a t l y , from a sim p le s t a te m e n t o f th e p e r s o n 's o c c u p a tio n to a d e t a i l e d s t a t e m ent o f b e n e f i t s th e i n d i v i d u a l had s e c u r e d f o r th e M exican community. The m ost f r e q u e n t r e a s o n f o r naming a p e rs o n (21 c a s e s ) was th e p o s s e s s i o n o f an o c c u p a tio n p e r c e i v e d as p r e s t i g e f u l by th e r e s p o n d e n t: p a r t i c u l a r l y o w n e rsh ip o f o n e 's own b u s i n e s s , b u t f r e q u e n t l y a l s o th e o c c u p a tio n s o f 149 t e a c h e r and p o l i c e o f f i c e r . Twelve p e r s o n s w ere c i t e d f o r t h e i r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n c i v i c a n d /o r p o l i t i c a l a c t i v i t y ( i n e i t h e r th e M exican-A m erican a n d /o r Anglo f i e l d ) , w h ile n in e p e r s o n s w ere more s p e c i f i c a l l y men t i o n e d a s n o te d f o r t h e i r g i v in g o f v a r i o u s k i n d s o f a s s i s t a n c e , i n c l u d i n g a d v ic e , to members o f t h e l o c a l M exican comm unity. Two p e r s o n s were c i t e d f o r t h e i r power one was m e n tio n e d a s h a v in g a " l o t o f p u l l " w h ile t h e o t h e r was c h a r a c t e r i z e d as "a b ig s h o t . " Two o t h e r i n d i v i d u a l s w ere m e n tio n e d b e c a u s e o f th e amount o f p u b l i c i t y t h e y r e c e i v e : " h e 's alw ays i n th e p a p e r ." R e s i d e n t i a l A reas One f r e q u e n t l y m e n tio n e d f e a t u r e o f M exican- American r e s i d e n t i a l p a t t e r n s t h a t i s a l s o n o t i c e a b l e i n Pomona i s t h e te n d e n c y f o r p e r s o n s o f M exican d e s c e n t to be c o n c e n t r a t e d i n c e r t a i n a r e a s , n e ig h b o rh o o d s and b lo c k s o f a c i t y . The a r e a o f h i g h e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n Pomona i s i n th e s o u th w e s te r n s e c t o r o f t h e c i t y w h ile a r e a s o f s e c o n d a ry c o n c e n t r a t i o n l i e c l o s e t o t h i s c o re on s e v e r a l s i d e s . A few o t h e r a r e a s a r e a t a g r e a t e r d i s t a n c e . In t h e Anglo v iew , a r e a s o f h ig h c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 150 Mexican r e s i d e n c e s a r e alm o st by d e f i n i t i o n th e l e s s d e s i r a b l e a r e a s . But i m p a r t i a l o b s e r v a t i o n o f p h y s i c a l c o n d it i o n and a p p e a ra n c e o f houses., s t r e e t s , and b u s i n e s s e s would co n firm t h i s p o i n t o f view . A f u r t h e r c o n t r i b u t i n g f a c t o r , from th e Anglo v ie w p o in t, i s th e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f N egroes i n th o s e a r e a s where th e M exicans a re a ls o c o n c e n t r a t e d . O th er f a c t o r s have been th e e n fo r c e d r e s i d e n t i a l s e g r e g a t i o n o f fo rm e r y e a r s , and th e g e n e r a l l y low economic s t a t u s o f Pomona's Mexican p o p u l a t i o n . As d is c u s s e d i n C h a p te r I I I , . s e v e n r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s o f th e c i t y w ere c l a s s i f i e d , i n o r d e r o f d e s i r a b i l i t y : A, B, C, D, and E. Area A i n c l u d e s th e N o r t h e a s t , g e n e r a l l y c o n s id e r e d th e b e s t o f any o f th e l a r g e d i s t r i c t s i n Pomona; t h e Gan- e sh a H i l l s a r e a , th e m ost e x c l u s i v e , b u t i n which o n ly one S p a n ish surname p e r s o n , a c a r e t a k e r , r e s i d e s ; and t h e e x c e l l e n t r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a n o r t h , e a s t , and s o u th o f th e Ganesha H i l l s . T here a re v e ry few o l d d w e llin g s i n t h i s a r e a . I t i s o v e rw h elm in g ly m id d le c l a s s . Area B i s a c o m p o site m o s tly o f f r i n g e a r e a s , b u i l t w i t h i n r e c e n t y e a r s ( i n c l u d in g K ello gg P ark, Valwood, Westmont and th e South End) and composed o f m id d le and w o r k i n g - c l a s s n e ig h b o rh o o d s . Here th e w r i t e r a ls o i n c l u d e d th e o l d e r n e a r N o r th e a s t and n e a r N o r th w e s t, a l s o m iddle t o w orking c l a s s i n c h a r a c t e r . The e a s t e r n p o r t i o n o f Area C i s th e s e c t i o n g e n e r a l l y known as th e S o u t h e a s t, w ith th e e x c e p ti o n o f t h e near-dow ntow n c o m m e rc ia lly zoned a r e a . I t i s p r i m a r i l y a w o r k in g - c la s s a r e a , b u t I s q u i t e h e te r o g e n e o u s w ith r e f e r e n c e to h o u sin g , w hich c o u ld be r a t e d from v e ry good t o v e ry p o o r. I t s e a s t e r n t h i r d i s zoned f o r i n d u s t r i a l p u r p o s e s and can be c o n s i d e r e d p o o r. The w e s te r n s e c t i o n o f C, t o g e t h e r w ith A re as D and E have th e h i g h e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f M exican Am erican p o p u l a t i o n i n Pomona, and th u s make up the c o lo n i a p r o p e r . The o l d e s t a r e a s w i t h i n th e c o l o n i a are D and E. Area D i s l a r g e l y zoned f o r com m ercial and l i g h t i n d u s t r i a l p u r p o s e s ( i t i n c l u d e s m ost o f Pom ona's down town shopping a r e a ) and i s a ls o th e l o c a t i o n o f Pom ona's e x p a n d in g C iv ic C e n te r. Many d w e llin g s a re b e in g d e m o lish ed i n the a r e a to make way f o r com m ercial and p u b l i c b u i l d i n g s , and b e f o r e many y e a r s have p a s s e d i t w i l l no l o n g e r be an im p o r ta n t p a r t o f th e c o l o n i a , i f in d e e d any d w e l l i n g s a t a l l re m a in w i t h i n th e a r e a . The number (as d e te rm in e d by t h e w r i t e r from th e c i t y d i r e c t o r y ) o f 152 M exican Am erican a d u l t s l i v i n g i n e a c h a r e a and t h e sam ple s i z e f o r e a c h a re shown i n T a b le 22. The w r i t e r s e c u r e d d a t a on how lo n g e a c h r e s p o n d e n t h a d l i v e d i n h i s c u r r e n t p l a c e o f r e s i d e n c e (s e e T a b le 2 3 ). I t w ould a p p e a r t h a t Area D, 90 p e r c e n t o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s from w hich h ad l i v e d l e s s th a n 6 y e a r s i n t h e i r p r e s e n t r e s i d e n c e , w ould be th e m ost u n s t a b l e from t h e p o i n t o f view o f l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e , a lt h o u g h th e sam ple from D i s to o s m a ll (10) t o e n a b le one t o make any d e f i n i t i v e s t a t e m e n t i n t h i s r e g a r d . A reas r a n k in g h i g h e r th a n D a r e more s t a b l e (A, B, C) w h ile E i s a l s o more s t a b l e , i n f a c t c o n s i d e r a b l y more so th a n th e h i g h e r r a n k in g a r e a s . Thus 6 6 .7 p e r c e n t o f r e s p o n d e n t s i n Area E h ad l i v e d i n t h e i r p r e s e n t homes f o r 6 y e a r s o r m ore, w h ile o n ly 35*1 p e r c e n t o f t h o s e i n A reas A and B, and o n ly 3 8 .2 p e r c e n t o f t h o s e i n A rea C had r e s i d e d t h e r e a s lo n g . T hese d i f f e r e n c e s , shown i n T a b le 23 a r e s i g n i f i c a n t s t a t i s t i c a l l y a t t h e .0 1 l e v e l . Thus th e m ost s t a b l e a r e a a p p e a r s t o i n c l u d e th e l e a s t d e s i r a b l e p o r t i o n s o f t h e M exican c o lo n y i n s o u t h w e s t e r n Pomona. S t a b i l i t y , c o n s e r v a t is m , p o v e r t y , and l a c k o f m o b i l i t y may be c o n s i d e r e d t h e k e y n o te s o f t h i s a r e a . 153 TABLE 22 ADULT MEXICAN POPULATION AND SAMPLE SIZE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS M exican A d u lts Area Num b e r P er c e n t Sample S ize Num- P er b e r c e n t P e rc e n ta g e Sample i s o f Mexican A d u lts A 240 9 .8 14 9 .5 5 .8 B 379 15-5 23 1 5 .6 6 . 1 C ( E a s t e r n ) 242 9 .9 15 1 0 .2 6 . 2 C (W e s te rn ) 668 2 7 .3 40 2 7 .2 6 . 0 D 164 6 .7 10 6 .8 6 .1 E ( N o r t h e r n ) 417 1 7 -0 25 1 7 .0 6 .0 E ( S o u t h e r n ) 336 13-7 20 1 3 .6 6 . 0 T o t a l 2446 9 9 .9 147 9 9 .9 6 . 0 TABLE 23 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE AND AREA Number o f Years Under 6 6 o r Over T o ta l Area Number P er c e n t Number P er c e n t Number P er c e n t A and B 24 6 4 ,9 13 35-1 37 10 0 .0 C 34 6 l . 8 21 3 8 .2 55 10 0.0 D 9 9 0 .0 1 1 0 .0 10 10 0 .0 E 15 33-3 30 6 6 .7 45 10 0 .0 T o ta l c h i 82 sq u a re 5 5 .8 = 15-98 P 65 = < .01 4 4 .2 147 100 .0 i— 1 vn 155 I t i s u n d e r s t a n d a b l e t h a t r e s i d e n t i a l s t a b i l i t y and home o w n e rsh ip would b e a s s o c i a t e d . T a b le 24 i n d i c a t e s t h a t r e s p o n d e n t s who own t h e i r own homes have c o n s i s t e n t l y h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e s i n l e n g t h - o f - r e s i d e n c e c a t e g o r i e s o f s i x y e a r s o r m ore, w h e re a s r e n t e r s have c o n s i s t e n t l y h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e s In l e n g t h - o f - r e s i d e n c e c a t e g o r i e s o f f i v e y e a r s o r l e s s . The c h i s q u a r e f o r T ab le 24 I s s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .01 l e v e l . The d a t a show a g e n e r a l te n d e n c y to w a rd a h i g h e r r a t e o f h om e-ow nership i n t h e h ig h e r r a n k in g a r e a s . A reas A and B a r e c l e a r l y s e e n in T a b le 25 t o have a h i g h e r r a t e o f home o w n e rsh ip t h a n th e o t h e r a r e a s (th o u g h i n t h i s i n s t a n c e r e s i d e n t i a l s t a b i l i t y i s l e s s th a n In a re a E p e r h ap s b e cau se o f t h e new ness o f A and B ), b u t t h e d i f f e r ence betw een t h e p e r c e n t a g e i n C on t h e one hand (6 9 -1 ) and D and E on th e o t h e r ( 6 5 - 5 ) i s n e g l i g i b l e . The c h i sq u a re f o r T a b le 22 i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . The w r i t e r o r i g i n a l l y h y p o t h e s iz e d t h a t th e h i g h e r r a n k in g th e a r e a , t h e h i g h e r w ould be t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f M exicans em ployed i n t h e h i g h e r - r a n k i n g o r more s k i l l e d o c c u p a ti o n s . T a b le 26 i n d i c a t e s a c o n s i s t e n t i n c r e a s e i n t h e p e rc e n ta g e o f a l l h e a d s o f h o u s e h o ld who a r e u n s k i l l e d TABLE 24 HOME OWNERSHIP AND LENGTH OP RESIDENCE Owner sh ip Number o f Years T o ta l Under 3 3-5 6- 10 11--20 Over 20 Num b e r Per c e n t Num- Per b e r c e n t Num- b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Own 14 1 3 .1 34 3 1 .8 24 2 2 .4 26 24 .3 9 8 .4 107 100.1 Rent 19 47-5 15 37-5 3 7*5 3 7-5 ” " ■ — •• 40 10 0.0 T o ta l 33 22 .4 49 3 3 .3 27 1 8 .4 29 19-7 9 6 .1 147 99-9 c h i sq u a re = 26.53 P = < .01 i — 1 V Ji a\ 157 TABLE 25 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND HOME OWNERSHIP Area • 1 1 1 1 1 Home Own O w nership R ent T o ta l Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t A and B 33 8 9 .2 4 1 0 .8 37 1 0 0 .0 C 38 6 9 .1 17 3 0 .9 55 1 0 0 .0 D and E 36- 6 5 .5 19 3 4 .5 55 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 107 7 2 .6 40 2 7 .4 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 6 . 7 7 P = .04 l a b o r e r s , from th e h i g h e s t r a n k in g a r e a . A, down th ro u g h th e lo w e s t r a n k in g a r e a , E. The r e v e r s e s i t u a t i o n h o ld s f o r p e r s o n s i n th e w h ite c o l l a r c a te g o r y . The h i g h e s t p e r c e n ta g e o f s k i l l e d w o rk e rs i n any a r e a i s 47*8 p e r c e n t f o r Area B. The p r e c e d in g r e l a t i o n s h i p s show q u i t e c l e a r l y th e a s s o c i a t i o n betw een th e ra n k o f an a r e a and th e r a n k o f o c c u p a tio n s fo llo w e d by r e s i d e n t s o f Mexican d e s c e n t i n e a c h o f t h e s e a r e a s . I t s h o u ld be f u r t h e r n o te d t h a t th e modal o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y f o r Area A i s w h ite c o l l a r ; f o r B, s k i l l e d ; f o r C and D, and f o r E, l a b o r e r s . The c h i s q u a re f o r T ab le 26 i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . The m edian t o t a l f a m i ly income f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n ts i s $ 5 ,7 0 4 . The m edians f o r A reas A, B and D ($7^750, $6,875 and $ 6,41 7 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) a r e above th e t o t a l m edian, w h ile th o s e f o r a r e a s C ($5>300) and E ($ 4 ,6 6 7 ) a r e below . W ith th e e x c e p ti o n o f Area D, th e ra n k c o r r e l a t i o n o f incom e w ith q u a l i t y o f a r e a i s c o m p le te ly c o n s i s t e n t . T a b le 27 r e v e a l s t h a t f o r th e h i g h e s t income c a t e g o r y ($ 8 ,0 0 0 o r o v e r ) , income i s p o s i t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith r a n k o f a r e a , w hereas f o r th e lo w e s t income c a t e g o r y (u n d e r $ 4 ,0 0 0 ) income i s n e g a t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith r a n k TABLE 26 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND OCCUPATION OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD ___________________O ccupation___________________________________ Semi- ! White R e l i e f L ab o re rs S k i l l e d S k i l l e d C o lla r T o ta l Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Area b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t A . . — • 1 7 .1 4 28.6 2 14 .3 7 5 0 .0 14 10 0.0 B 1 4 .3 2 8 .7 3 1 3 .0 11 4 7 .8 6 26.1 23 9 9 .9 C and D 3 4 .6 24 36.9 16 24.6 18 27.7 4 6 .2 65 10 0 .0 E 5 11.1 24 5 3 .3 12 26.7 3 6 .7 1 2 .2 45 10 0 .0 T o ta l 9 6 .1 51 34.7 35 2 3 .8 34 23.1 18 1 2 .2 147 9 9 .9 c h i sq u a re = 45.75 P ii m O C = .487 v jI vo TABLE 27 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND INCOME OP RESPONDENTS Area Under $4,000 $4,00 0- . $5,999_._ $6,000- ... $7,999 . $8,000 o r Over T o ta l Median Num b e r Per c e n t Num-. b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t A 1 7 .7 3 23.1 3. 23.1 6 4 6 .2 13 100.1 $7,750 B 2 9 .5 5 2 3 .8 5 2 3 .8 9 4 2 .9 21 10 0.0 6,875 C and D 14 23 .0 21 34 .4 20 3 2 .8 6 9 .8 61 100 .0 5,591 E 15 35.7 14 33-3 9 21.4 4 9 .5 42 99.9 4,6 6 7 j T o ta l 32 23 .4 43 31.4 37 27 .0 25 1 8 .2 137 100 .0 $5,704 c h i sq uare = 24. 68 P = < .01 C = .391 091 l6l o f a r e a . The a r e a s h a v in g t h e l a r g e s t p e r c e n t a g e s in th e i n t e r m e d i a t e b r a c k e t s a re C and D. The l a r g e s t p e r c e n ta g e o f re s p o n d e n ts who i d e n t i f i e d t h e i r " n a t i o n a l i t y " as "Mexican" was found i n Area A (100 p e r c e n t ) and th e lo w e s t i n Area B (73-9 p e r c e n t) . The r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een a r e a and s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n was n e i t h e r p a t t e r n e d n o r s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . There i s on t h e o t h e r hand a p e r f e c t c o r r e l a t i o n betw een ra n k o f a r e a and ra n k o f p e r c e n ta g e o f r e s p o n d e n ts w ith whom i n t e r v i e w i n g was c a r r i e d on i n th e E n g li s h la n g u a g e as i s shown i n T able 28. The c h i sq u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .05 l e v e l . As f a r a s s i z e o f f a m i ly i s c o n ce rn e d , t h e r e were no f a r r e a c h in g c o n c lu s io n s w ith r e f e r e n c e to a r e a l d i s t r i b u t i o n . There i s a s l i g h t n o n s i g n i f i c a n t te n d e n c y to w ard l a r g e r f a m i l i e s in th e b e t t e r (A and B) and in th e lo w e s t r a n k in g (E) a r e a s . The h ig h e r ra n k in g a r e a s are p re d o m in a n tly f a m ily a r e a s . The lo w e r ra n k in g t h e a re a , th e g r e a t e r i s t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f in c o m p le te n u c l e a r f a m i l i e s . Of a l l widowed, d iv o r c e d o r s e p a r a t e d p e r s o n s , o n ly 2 a re found i n Area B, and th e o t h e r 23 a r e a l l in a r e a s C, D o r E. S in g le p e r s o n s a p p e a r to be f a i r l y w e ll 162 TABLE 28 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND LANGUAGE PREFERENCE OF RESPONDENTS Language E n g l i s h S panish T o ta l Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Area ber cent b e r c e n t b e r c e n t A 14 100.0 14 10 0 .0 B 19 82.6 4 17-4 23 1 0 0 .0 C 39 70.9 16 29-1 55 1 0 0 .0 D 6 60.0 4 4 0 .0 10 10 0 .0 E 26 57-8 19 4 2 .2 45 10 0 .0 T o ta l 104 70.7 43 29-3 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i square = 1 1 . 5 3 P = *03 C .-~ . 270 163 d i s t r i b u t e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e v e n a r e a s . T a b le 29 shows t h a t t h e h i g h e r r a n k i n g t h e a r e a , t h e h i g h e r i s t h e p r o p o r t i o n w h ic h m a r r i e d p e r s o n s c o n s t i t u t e o f a l l r e s i d e n t s i n t h e a r e a . Chi s q u a r e f o r T a b le 29 i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .0 5 l e v e l . I n a c c o r d w i t h t h e commonly h e l d i d e a t h a t i t i s t h e y o u n g e r and b e t t e r e d u c a t e d m a r r i e d M ex ican c o u p l e s t h a t move o u t o f o l d e r c o l o n l a a r e a s and s e t t l e i n t h e new, b e t t e r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s , T a b le 30 i n d i c a t e s some t e n d e n c y f o r y o u n g e r p e r s o n s t o l i v e i n t h e b e t t e r a r e a s . T h e re a r e l i k e w i s e c e r t a i n t e n d e n c i e s e v i d e n t i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by a r e a a c c o r d i n g t o g e n e r a t i o n . From T a b le 31 i t i s s e e n t h a t t h e r e a r e no f i r s t - g e n e r a t i o n p e r s o n s i n t h e b e s t a r e a (A ), a s i z e a b l e num ber o f them i n t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e a r e a s (B, C and D) and a s t i l l l a r g e r p e r c e n t a g e i n A rea E. F o r t h e s e c o n d - g e n e r a t i o n , t h e a r e a r e l a t i o n s h i p i s r e v e r s e d . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e s m a l l e s t p e r c e n t a g e o f l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s a r e fo u n d a t t h e e x tr e m e s an d t h e l a r g e s t p e r c e n t a g e s i n t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e a r e a s (B, C and D). I t can. be h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e s e c o n d - g e n e r a t i o n p e r s o n s h a v e b e e n m o b ile a n d h av e moved o u t t o t h e b e t t e r 164 TABLE 29 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND MARITAL STATUS OF RESPONDENTS A rea M a r i t a l M a r r i e d S t a t u s N ot M a r r i e d T o t a l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t A a n d B 31 83-8 6 1 6 .2 37 1 0 0 .0 C a n d D 50 7 6 .9 15 23.1 65 1 0 0 .0 E 27 60. 0 18 4 0 .0 45 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 108 73-5 39 2 6 .5 147 100.0 c h i sq u a re = 6 . 4 7 p = .04 165 TABLE 30 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND AGE OP RESPONDENTS A rea Age 20-39 i o 00 T o t a l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t A a n d B . 24 6 4 .9 13 35-1 37 1 0 0 .0 C an d D 38 5 8 .5 27 41.5 65 1 0 0 .0 E 23 5 1 .1 22 4 8 .9 45 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 85 5.7-8 62 4 2 .2 147 1 0 0 .0 166 TABLE 31 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND GENERATION OP RESPONDENTS _______________ G e n e r a tio n __________________ F i r s t Second L a t e r T o ta l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- Per Area b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t A __ 13 9 2 .9 1 7 -1 14 100.0 B 5 21.7 14 6 0 .9 4 1 7 .4 23 100.0 C and D 13 2 0 .0 34 5 3 - 0 18 2 7 .0 65 100.0 E 14 3 1 .1 25 5 5 .6 6 1 3 .3 45 100.0 T o ta l 32 2 1 .8 86 5 8 .5 29 1 9 -7 147 1 0 0 .0 a r e a s , w h ile f i r s t - g e n e r a t i o n p e rs o n s h av e n o t b e e n as m o b ile and have p r e f e r r e d t o rem a in i n t h e a r e a s o f h ig h c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f t h e i r e t h n i c f e l l o w s . The d i s t r i b u t i o n o f th e l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s i s m ore l i k e t h a t o f th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n th a n o f th e se c o n d . They a r e c o n c e n t r a t e d in a r e a s o f h ig h M exican e th n ic d e n s i t y ; 24 o u t o f 29 l i v e i n a r e a s C, D, and E. Table 3 2 shows a te n d e n c y f o r r e s p o n d e n t s i n h i g h e r ra n k in g a r e a s to have had more s c h o o l i n g . 168 TABLE 32 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND SCHOOLING OP RESPONDENTS Area Y ears o f S c h o o lin g T o t a l 0- 8 9 -11 12 o r More Num- b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t A and B 9 2 4 .3 15 4 0 .5 13 3 5 .1 37 9 9 -9 C and D 29 4 4 .6 18 2 7-7 18 2 7 .7 65 1 0 0 .0 E 21 4 6 .7 14 3 1 .1 10 2 2 .2 45 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 59 4 o . l 47 3 2 .0 41 2 7 .9 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 4 .3 8 p = .0 4 C = .17 0 CHAPTER V PERCEPTION OF STATUS DIFFERENCES One o f th e p r i n c i p a l aim s o f th e r e s e a r c h h e re r e p o r t e d c e n t e r e d on s e c u r i n g d a ta on p e r c e p t i o n by mem- b e r s o f a M exican-A m erican community o f th e p a t t e r n o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n t h a t community. T h is aim d i f f e r s c o n s i d e r a b l y from t h a t o f much r e s e a r c h r e p o r t e d In th e l i t e r a t u r e , w here th e M exican-A m erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e was d e l i n e a t e d on th e b a s i s o f d a ta p r o v id e d by Anglo i n f o r m a n ts . The p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h i s a l s o u n iq u e In t h a t i t u t i l i z e d an a r e a sam ple r a t h e r th a n s e l e c t e d I n f o r m a n ts , a s i n t h e c a se o f a l l s t u d i e s o f M exican-A m erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e known to th e r e s e a r c h e r . Data were s e c u re d on th e ty p e o f s o c i a l d i f f e r e n c e s c o n s i d e r e d im p o r ta n t by Mexican i n f o r m a n ts i n Pomona, th e number o f M exican and Anglo c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d , and th e c r i t e r i a u se d i n d i s t i n g u i s h i n g v a r i o u s s o c i a l c l a s s e s from e a c h o t h e r . C a te g o r ie s o f p e r c e p t i o n have i n t u r n been r e l a t e d t o c e r t a i n c u l t u r a l and economic 169 170 c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f r e s p o n d e n t s such a s o c c u p a t i o n , s c h o o l i n g , and the. a r e a o f r e s i d e n c e . B e fo re he made any m e n tio n o f s o c i a l c l a s s , th e r e s e a r c h e r a sk e d eac h o f h i s r e s p o n d e n t s th e q u e s t i o n , "What w ould y o u sa y a r e t h e m ost i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e s fo u n d among th e p e o p le o f M exican o r i g i n h e re i n Pomona? T h a t i s , w hat d i f f e r e n t g ro u p s o r ty p e s would you d i v id e them i n t o ? " A t o t a l o f 61 r e s p o n d e n t s , c o n s t i t u t i n g 4 1 .5 p e r c e n t o f th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple were e i t h e r u n a b le to p e r c e i v e i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e s among t h e Mexican p o p u l a t i o n o f Pomona, o r u n w i l l i n g to s t a t e t h e i r o p i n io n w i t h r e g a r d to su c h d i f f e r e n c e s . Of th e a n sw e rs g iv e n to th e q u e s t i o n , 4 0 .7 p e r c e n t w ere o r i e n t e d to w a rd c l a s s o r so c io e c o n o m ic s t a t u s ; 32.6 p e r c e n t w ere o r i e n t e d to w a rd a c c u l t u r a t i o n ; 1 1 .6 p e r c e n t w ere o r i e n t e d to w a rd e d u c a t i o n ; 1 0 .5 p e r c e n t d e a l t w ith p e r s o n a l q u a l i t i e s and 4 .7 p e r c e n t w ith r e l i g i o n . In an sw er to t h i s q u e s t i o n , one e s p e c i a l l y k n o w le d g e a b le i n f o r m a n t c l a s s i f i e d Pom ona's M exican- Am erican p o p u l a t i o n i n t o f o u r c a t e g o r i e s , a s f o l l o w s : ( l ) One g ro u p i s th e o l d e r g e n e r a t i o n ; t h e y a r e d i f f e r e n t i n t h a t t h e y d o n 't sp e ak E n g l i s h . They d o n 't t a k e p a r t i n s o c i a l a c t i v i t i e s u n l e s s S p a n is h i s u s e d . 171 ( 2 ) The y o u n g e r g ro u p o f M ex ican-A m erican k i d s t h a t a r e m o s tly t h e same w ay; t h e y d o n 't l i k e t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a n y th i n g t h a t i s Anglo- A m erican. (3 ) The m a r r i e d , m o s t l y y o u n g e r, g e n e r a t i o n p e o p le who w i s h t o d i s a s s o c i a t e th e m s e lv e s com p l e t e l y from t h e M exican -A m erican c u l t u r e . ( 4 ) One g r o u p t h a t i s t r y i n g t o c u l t i v a t e t h e M exican c u l t u r e and k e e p i t g o in g and a t th e same tim e be good A m erican c i t i z e n s s o c i a l l y and c i v i c - a l l y . T h is c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n p o i n t s up th e c r i t i c a l v a r i a b l e s o f g e n e r a t i o n , a g e and la n g u a g e u s a g e . The same in f o r m a n t th e n p r o c e e d e d t o d e s c r i b e th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e p r i m a r i l y i n o c c u p a t i o n a l te r m s . P e r c e p t i o n o f S o c i a l C l a s s e s I n Pomona e a c h r e s p o n d e n t was n e x t a s k e d t h e f o l l o w i n g q u e s t i o n ; " P e rh a p s you h a v e h e a r d p e o p le sp e a k o f t h e s o - c a l l e d s o c i a l c l a s s e s , su ch a s th e u p p e r c l a s s , t h e w orking c l a s s , t h e lo w e r c l a s s , t h e m id d le c l a s s , e t c . Among t h e p e o p le o f M exican ( o r S p a n is h - s p e a k i n g ) o r i g i n h e r e i n Pomona how many s o c i a l c l a s s e s w ould y ou s a y t h e r e a r e ? What do y o u c a l l them ?" The number o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d by r e s p o n d e n t s v a r i e d from 1 t o 4, w i t h a mode a t 2, a mean 172 o f 2 .3 and a m edian o f 2 .6 . The te rm in o lo g y was q u i t e v a r i e d a l s o , and some r e s p o n d e n ts were a t a l o s s t o a s s i g n l a b e l s t o c l a s s e s t h e y c o u ld d e s c r i b e . A number o f r e s p o n d e n ts (3 9 )* c o n s t i t u t i n g 26.5 p e r c e n t o f t h e e n t i r e sam ple, were u n a b le o r u n w i l l i n g to an sw er th e q u e s t i o n s a sk ed c o n c e rn in g s o c i a l c l a s s . R e sp o n d e n ts who p e r c e i v e d c l a s s d i v i s i o n s i n th e M exican community ( i . e . , two, t h r e e o r f o u r c l a s s e s ) had more s c h o o lin g , had h i g h e r s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n i n th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , were y o u n g e r, and a h ig h e r p r o p o r t i o n o f them were i n te r v ie w e d i n E n g lis h th a n was th e c a s e w ith th o s e who p e r c e i v e d no c l a s s d i v i s i o n s . A ll o f th e s e d i f f e r e n c e s , p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le s 33* 3^* 35* and 36 a re s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . In a d d i t i o n th e y h e l d more o r g a n i z a t i o n a l m em berships o t h e r th a n i n c h u rc h o r l a b o r u n io n , h ad h i g h e r incom es and w ere more num erous among th e l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s ; t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le s 37* 38 and 39 a re s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . T here were no s i g n i f i c a n t v a r i a t i o n s w ith r e s p e c t t o r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , o c c u p a ti o n a l c a te g o r y , s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , o r sex . 173 TABLE 33 SCHOOLING AND CONSCIOUSNESS OP CLASS DIVISIONS Y ears o f S c h o o lin g Do Not P e rc e iv e C lass D iv is io n s P e rc e iv e C lass D iv is io n s T o ta l Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t 0 - 8 40 6 7 .8 19 3 2 .2 59 1 0 0 .0 9-11 16 3 4 .0 31 6 6 .0 47 1 0 0 ,0 12 o r More 8 19-5 33 80.5 41 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 64 4 3 .5 83 5 6 .5 147 10 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 25.3 8 p = < . 0 1 c = .384 174 TABLE 34 CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Do Not P e r c e i v e C la s s D i v i s i o n s P e r c e iv e C la s s D i v i s i o n s T o t a l s C l a s s - S e l f P la ce m e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Upper and M iddle 8 1 2 .9 54 87-1 62 1 0 0 .0 Working 11 4 7 -8 12 5 2 .2 23 1 0 0 .0 Lower 7 4 3 .8 9 5 6 .2 16 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 26 2 5 .7 75 7 4 .3 101 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 1 4 .0 8 p = < . 01 C = • 350 TABLE 35 AGE AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Age Do Not P e r c e i v e C la s s D i v i s i o n s P e r c e iv e C la s s D i v i s i o n s T o t a l s Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 20-39 27 3 1 .8 58 6 8 .2 85 1 0 0 .0 4 0 -8 9 37 5 9 -7 25 4 0 .3 62 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 64 4 3 -5 83 5 6 .5 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 1 1 .3 4 p = < . 01 C = . 268 176 TABLE 36 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Language Do Not P e r c e i v e C la s s D i v i s i o n s P e r c e iv e C la s s D i v i s i o n s T o ta l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t E n g l i s h 35 3 3 -7 69 6 6 .4 104 1 0 0 .1 S p a n is h 29 6 7 -4 14 32 .6 43 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 64 4 3 .5 83 5 6 .5 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 1 4 .1 9 p = < . 01 C = .297 177 TABLE 37 MEMBERSHIPS AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Do Not P e r c e i v e P e r c e iv e C la s s C la s s Number o f D i v i s i o n s D i v i s i o n s T o t a l M em berships3 Num- P e r Num- Per Num- P er H eld b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t None 43 5 3 -8 37 4 6 .2 80 1 0 0 .0 One 12 3 0 .0 28 7 0 .0 40 1 0 0 .0 Two o r More 9 3 3 .3 18 6 6 .7 27 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 64 4 3-5 83 5 6 .5 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 7*56 p = .03 a O th e r th an i n ch u rch o r l a b o r u n io n . TABLE 3 8 INCOME AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Do T o ta l Annual Not P e rc e iv e Class D iv is io n s P e r c e iv e C la s s D i v i s i o n s T o ta l F a m ily Income Num b e r Per c e n t Num ber P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Under $4,000 19 59-4 13 4 0 .6 32 1 0 0 .0 4 ,0 0 0 - 5 ,9 9 9 18 4 1 .9 25 5 8 .1 43 1 0 0 .0 6 , 000- 7,.000 14 3 7 .8 23 6 2 .2 37 1 0 0 .0 8,0 0 0 o r Over 6 2 4 .0 19 7 6 .0 25 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 57 4 1 .6 80 5 8 .4 137 1 0 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 7 . 4 7 P = • 03 C = .2 2 7 179 TABLE 39 GENERATION AND CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS Do Not P e r c e iv e C lass D i v i s i o n s P e r c e iv e C la ss D iv i s i o n s T o ta l G e n e ra tio n Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t F i r s t 21 6 5 .6 11 3 4 .4 32 1 0 0 .0 Second 33 3 8 .4 53 6 1 .6 86 1 0 0 .0 L a te r 10 3 4 .5 19 6 5 .5 2.9 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 64 43-5 83 5 6 .5 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 8 .3 6 p = .0 2 C = .232 180 E s s e n t i a l l y , _t h i s p a r t o f th e r e s e a r c h aimed a t e l i c i t i n g any c o g n i t i v e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s o f c l a s s ( s t e r e o t y p e s ) p r e v a l e n t i n th e Mexican community. D e s c r i p t i o n s o f t h e n a t u r e o f th e M exican-A m erican s o c i a l c l a s s e s g iv e n to th e r e s e a r c h e r by in f o r m a n ts were n e i t h e r c o n s i s t e n t n o r p a r t i c u l a r l y e x p l i c i t i n m ost c a s e s . Some in f o r m a n ts w ere more p e r c e p t i v e th a n o t h e r s , and each view ed th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e from h i s own p e r s p e c t i v e . N e v e r t h e l e s s , some g e n e r a l p a t t e r n s emerge from t h e d e s c r i p t i o n s f u r n i s h e d by th e more a r t i c u l a t e in f o r m a n ts , a lth o u g h even among t h i s group te r m in o lo g y v a r i e d c o n s i d e r a b l y , and th e number o f c l a s s e s from one to f o u r . In d e s c r i b i n g a t w o - c l a s s system , in f o r m a n ts g e n e r a l l y d e p ic te d a p o o r, s e m i - l i t e r a t e grou p o f u n a c c u l- t u r a t e d and u n s k i l l e d w o rk e rs and t h e i r f a m i l i e s as th e bottom s tr a tu m and a group o f b re a d w in n e rs h o ld in g s k i l l e d o r w h ite c o l l a r jo b s , who were c o n c e rn e d w ith e d u c a tio n and "im provem ent" a s an u p p e r s t r a tu m . A f r e q u e n t o b s e r v a t i o n was t h a t p e o p le i n t h e u p p e r gro u p were " t r y i n g to g e t ahead" w h ile th o s e In th e lo w er group " d o n 't t r y " o r " d o n 't c a r e . " One in fo r m a n t d e s c r i b e d th e d i f f e r e n c e betw een th e two g ro u p s as f o l l o w s : 181 T h e r e 's an u p p e r c l a s s and a peon c l a s s . The peon c l a s s a r e n ' t s t r i v i n g to b e t t e r th e m s e lv e s ; l i f e i s j u s t an e x i s t e n c e . The u p p e r c l a s s a re s t r i v i n g f o r b e t t e r e d u c a ti o n f o r th e m s e lv e s and t h e i r f a m i l i e s an d o v e rlo o k th e f a c t t h a t t h e y ' r e i n th e m i n o r i t y . They a r e i d e n t i f i e d by t h e way t h e y c o n d u c t th e m s e lv e s i n a p l a c e o f b u s i n e s s . The u p p e r c l a s s can m in g le w ith w h i t e s w i t h o u t f e e l i n g i n f e r i o r i n any way. The o t h e r g ro u p i s u n e d u c a te d ; th e y a r e s e l f - c o n s c i o u s when among t h e m a j o r i t y . A n o th er in f o r m a n t s a i d "The m id d le c l a s s i s more c o n c e rn e d w i t h e d u c a ti o n and advancem ent o f t h e r a c e a s a w h o le; th e w orking c l a s s i s m o s tly th e o l d e r p e o p le , s a t i s f i e d a s t h e y a r e now." T h is r e l a t i o n s h i p o f g e n e r a t i o n and m o b i l i t y was p o i n t e d o u t by a n o t h e r in f o r m a n t who f e l t t h a t " e a c h g e n e r a t i o n i s a s t e p ah ead o f th e p r e c e d i n g on e, i n s t a n d a r d o f l i v i n g and a d ju s tm e n t to s o c i a l l i f e . " Some p e r s p e c t i v e s d i f f e r e d r a d i c a l l y from e a c h o t h e r . W hile one i n f o r m a n t s t a t e d t h a t Pom ona's M exicans c o n s i s t e d o f " m o stly m id d le c l a s s , w i t h a few p o o r p e o p l e , " a n o t h e r b e l i e v e d t h e y were " m o s tly w orking c l a s s , w i t h a few p r o f e s s i o n a l s ." In eac h c a s e th e r e s p o n d e n t p l a c e d h i m s e l f i n t h e l a r g e r g ro u p . The f i r s t in f o r m a n t was th e w ife o f a s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk e r, t h e se co n d was a w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e r. Thus t h e f i r s t in f o r m a n t a p p e a rs to have g ro u p e d h e r s e l f t o g e t h e r w i t h a l l th o s e above h e r i n t h e 182 c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , w h ile th e seco n d in f o r m a n t a p p e a r s to have g ro u p e d h i m s e l f w i t h a l l th o s e below him i n t h e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e . D e s p ite th e f a c t t h a t th e se co n d in f o r m a n t i s o f h i g h e r s t a t u s (n o t o n ly o c c u p a t i o n a l l y , b u t e c o n o m ic a l l y , e d u c a t i o n a l l y , and r e s i d e n t i a l l y ), he h a s p l a c e d him s e l f i n t h e lo w e r s tr a tu m o f a t w o - s t r a t a sy ste m , t h e f i r s t in f o r m a n t p l a c i n g h e r s e l f i n th e to p s t r a tu m o f a tw o- s t r a t a sy ste m . One p e r s o n who p e r c e i v e d h e r s e l f i n th e u p p e r s tr a tu m n o t e d t h a t " t h e r e a r e p e o p le who a r e s m a r t e r , have b e t t e r p o s i t i o n s and homes; b u t some p e o p le j u s t d o n 't t r y . " A d i f f e r e n t p o i n t o f view was ta k e n by an in f o r m a n t who p e r c e i v e d h e r s e l f i n th e b o tto m s t r a t u m : "Those t h a t a re w e l l o f f d o n 't m in g le w ith th e o t h e r s ; t h e y a r e a l i t t l e b i t s n o b b i s h . " A v e ry p o o r b u t p e r c e p t i v e sm a ll b u sin e ssm a n o f v e r y humble o r i g i n s , and w i t h l i m i t e d e d u c a ti o n and com mand o f E n g l i s h d e s c r i b e d t h e c l a s s system a s f o l l o w s : "As f o r t h e lo w e r c l a s s , i t s s o c i a l medium i s d i f f e r e n t , b e in g made up o f th e f r u i t p i c k e r s and c o n s t r u c t i o n w o r k e r s , w h ile t h e m id d le c l a s s c o n s i s t s o f th o s e who have had a c e r t a i n amount o f s c h o o l in g , t e a c h e r s , f o r 183 e x a m p le ." T his man p l a c e d h i m s e l f i n t h e lo w er c l a s s . T h ere a p p e a r s to be a n o t h e r d e f i n i t e te n d e n c y to « e q u a te "w orking c l a s s " and "m idd le c l a s s . " Among th o s e i n f o r m a n ts p e r c e i v i n g two s o c i a l c l a s s e s , o n ly two d i s t i n g u i s h e d betw een "w orking" and " m id d le ." The m o st f r e q u e n t d i s t i n c t i o n made was betw een "m id d le " and " l o w e r ." The d a ta c o l l e c t e d d e f i n i t e l y i n d i c a t e t h a t th e d i s t i n c t i o n b etw een w h i t e - c o l l a r and b l u e - c o l l a r w o rk e rs i s n o t r e l e v a n t t o c l a s s d i s t i n c t i o n s a s p e r c e i v e d by t h o s e i n f o r m a n ts d e s c r i b i n g a t w o - c l a s s sy ste m . N e v e r t h e l e s s , w i t h one e x c e p t i o n , a l l p e r s o n s named by r e s p o n d e n t s as M exican l e a d e r s w ere w h ite c o l l a r w o r k e r s . I n f o r m a n ts t h u s p e r h a p s make th e d i s t i n c t i o n i m p l i c i t l y . In an y c a s e , as a r e s u l t o f h i s s t u d y th e r e s e a r c h e r fo u n d i t n e c e s s a r y t o d i s t i n g u i s h betw een w h ite and b lu e c o l l a r w o rk e rs i n s e t t i n g up h i s s t a t u s ty p o lo g y . The d e s c r i p t i o n s o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s f u r n i s h e d by I n f o r m a n ts p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e c l a s s e s o r s t a t u s l e v e l s a re c o n g ru e n t w i t h t h o s e j u s t d e s c r i b e d . They f a l l i n t o two m ain c a t e g o r i e s ( l ) a t r i p a r t i t e d i v i s i o n I n t o econom ic o r o c c u p a t i o n a l l e v e l s , and (2) t h e more p e r c e p t i v e d i v i s i o n i n t o " d o n 't c a r e , " " s t r i v e r s " and " e l i t e " l e v e l s . 184 As an exam ple o f t h e f i r s t c a t e g o r y , one i n f o r m a n t d e s c r i b e d t h e c l a s s system a s f o l l o w s : "The h ig h c l a s s make a l i t t l e more money; th e y have t h e i r own b u s i n e s s e s . The medium c l a s s work f o r somebody e l s e . The low c l a s s w ork when t h e y can o r d e pend on c o u n ty a i d . " A n oth er i n f o r m a n t d i v i d e d Pom ona's M exicans i n t o th e w e l l - t o - d o o r s t o r e ow ners; p e o p le w i t h good s k i l l e d j o b s , and th e " r e g u l a r n o d -h e a d s " o r u n s k i l l e d w o r k e r s . A more e x p l i c i t d e s c r i p t i o n was g iv e n by th e i n f o r m a n t who s a i d : T h e r e ' s th e v e r y p o o r , t h e p o o r h av e more c h i l d r e n ; th e y d o n 't work s t e a d y o r d o n 't t r y to work s t e a d y . The m id d le c l a s s a r e t h o s e t h a t have s t e a d y em ploym ent, and a r e b u y in g a home o r a c a r ; t h e y have t h e n e c e s s i t i e s o f l i f e w i t h o u t s t r u g g l i n g so h a r d . The h i g h e r - u p p e o p le have money, a r e w e a lth y , t h e y a re b e t t e r o f f t h a n th e r e s t o f u s ; b e t t e r hom es, c a r s , e d u c a t i o n . The d e s c r i p t i o n s f a l l i n g i n t o t h e se co n d c a t e g o r y a r e s i m i l a r t o th o s e o f t h e f i r s t , e x c e p t t h a t th e y a r e m ore e x p l i c i t a b o u t th e m em bership o f t h e to p s t r a tu m . Thus one i n f o r m a n t b e l i e v e d t h a t " t h e o n e s i n th e u p p e r c l a s s s o c i a l l y a r e o l d C a l i f o r n i a f a m i l i e s , " w h ile a n o t h e r c h a r a c t e r i z e d t h e to p c l a s s a s c o n s i s t i n g o f "P e o p le l i k e Mr. X and Mr. Y who a r e w o rk in g f o r t h e b e t t e r m e n t o f o u r p e o p l e . " O th e r s n o te d t h e b e t t e r e d u c a t i o n o f t h e u p p e r c l a s s o r th e e x c e l l e n t q u a l i t y o f t h e i r S p a n is h and 185 E n g l i s h . Some n o te d t h e i r more a c t i v e s o c i a l l i f e and a b i l i t y to a f f o r d e x p e n s iv e ty p e s o f e n t e r t a i n m e n t . The in f o r m a n ts p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e c l a s s e s were more i n c l i n e d th a n th o s e p e r c e i v i n g two to use d e r o g a to r y te r m in o lo g y w ith r e f e r e n c e to th e lo w e s t s tr a tu m . One in f o r m a n t c h a r a c t e r i z e d them a s h a v in g v i c e s , a n o th e r as c o n s i s t i n g o f th e d e l i n q u e n t s , a n o th e r a s h a v in g q u ic k te m p e rs , w h ile a n o th e r c a l l e d them "P a c h u c o s." The p i c t u r e w hich em erges from an e x a m in a tio n o f r e s p o n d e n t s ' d e s c r i p t i o n s o f th e s o c i a l c l a s s s t r u c t u r e i s a c o n g ru e n t, i f n o t a c o n s i s t e n t o ne. T hat i s , th e d e s c r i p t i o n s do n o t c o n t r a d i c t e a c h o t h e r ; t h e y a p p e a r to d i s a g r e e p r i m a r i l y w ith r e g a r d to w here th e b o u n d a rie s s h o u ld be draw n. Four d i f f e r e n t s t a t u s l e v e l s a p p e a r i n th e d e s c r i p t i o n s : ( l ) a p o o r, s e m i - l i t e r a t e group o f u n s k i l l e d w o rk e rs who do n o t t r y to " g e t a h e a d " ; (2) a r e s p e c t a b l e gro u p o f w orking c l a s s p e o p le , i n t e r e s t e d i n e d u c a ti o n and g e t t i n g ah ead ; (3) b e t t e r - p a i d w o rk e rs, e s p e c i a l l y w e ll e d u c a te d and a c c u l t u r a t e d ; (4) a b u s i n e s s o r p r o f e s s i o n a l s o c i a l and c i v i c e l i t e . Almost a l l in f o r m a n ts who d ic h o to m iz e d th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e d id so betw een l e v e l s ( l ) and ( 2 ) ; o n ly one in f o r m a n t drew t h e 186 bo u n d ary betw een (2) and (3) and o n ly t h r e e in f o r m a n ts drew i t betw een l e v e l s (3) and (4 ). These in f o r m a n ts g ro u p in g l e v e l s (2) (3) and (4) i n t o one s o c i a l c l a s s g e n e r a l l y c a l l e d i t "m iddle c l a s s , " and c a l l e d l e v e l (1) "lo w er c l a s s . " I n t e r e s t i n g l y enough, each o f th e s e two c l a s s e s were c a l l e d "w orking c l a s s " by^ a few in f o r m a n ts ; as a m a t t e r o f f a c t , a l l in f o r m a n ts who drew th e l i n e betw een (3) and (4) c a l l e d th e combined ( l ) - ( 2 ) - ( 3 ) c l a s s t h e "w orking c l a s s . " P e rso n s p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e c l a s s e s m ost f r e q u e n t l y o m it t e d m e n tio n in g e i t h e r l e v e l (3) o r l e v e l ( 4 ) , i . e . , th e y combined t h e s e two l e v e l s . C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e sp o n d e n ts and Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d The number o f M exican-A m erican s o c i a l c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d by r e s p o n d e n ts i n th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple v a r i e d from one t o f o u r . Of t h e r e s e a r c h e r ’ s sam ple 7 3 -4 p e r c e n t w ere a b le to s t a t e th e number o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s th e y b e l i e v e d e x i s t e d among th e p e r s o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t i n Pomona. Of t h e s e r e s p o n d e n t s .23 -1 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d one - - c l a s s , 4 1 .7 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d two c l a s s e s , 3 1 .5 p e r c e n t 187 p e r c e i v e d t h r e e c l a s s e s , and 3*7 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d f o u r c l a s s e s . The te n d e n c y to p e r c e i v e a g iv e n number o f c l a s s e s was a s s o c i a t e d w ith c e r t a i n o b j e c t i v e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f r e s p o n d e n t s . Thus, f o r exam ple, th e more s c h o o lin g a r e s p o n d e n t h ad , th e more l i k e l y he was to p e r c e i v e two c l a s s e s th a n one c l a s s ; o r on th e o t h e r hand, as i n d i c a t e d i n T able 40, th e p r o p o r t i o n s o f r e s p o n d e n ts i n e a c h o f th e e d u c a t i o n a l c a t e g o r i e s p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e o r f o u r c l a s s e s were v i r t u a l l y i d e n t i c a l . The c h i s q u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . The p r o p o r t i o n o f p e r s o n s p r e f e r r i n g E n g lis h f o r th e i n t e r v i e w was h i g h e r among r e s p o n d e n ts p e r c e i v i n g two to f o u r c l a s s e s and lo w e r among th o s e p e r c e i v i n g o n e, th a n t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f S p a n ish s p e a k e r s , a s m a n if e s te d i n T ab le 4 l , th e c h i s q u a re f o r w h ich i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . S i m i l a r l y , th e p r o p o r t i o n o f p e rs o n s u n d e r 40 y e a r s o f age p e r c e i v i n g two to f o u r c l a s s e s was h i g h e r , and th e p r o p o r t i o n o f th o se p e r c e i v i n g one c l a s s was lo w e r th a n f o r re s p o n d e n ts o v e r 40, a s seen i n T a b le 42. The c h i s q u a re f o r t h i s d i f f e r e n c e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . 188 TABLE 40 SCHOOLING AND NUMBER OP CLASSES PERCEIVED Y ears of S c h o o lin g Number o f C la s s e s P e rc e iv e d T o ta l One Two Three o r Four Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 0 -8 16 45-7 7 2 0 .0 12 3 4 .3 35 1 0 0 .0 9-11 5 13-9 18 5 0 .0 13 3 6 .1 36 1 0 0 .0 12 o r More 4 1 0 .8 20 5 4 .1 13 35-1 37 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 25 23-1 45 4 1 .7 38 35-2 108 1 0 0 .0 chi s q u a r e = 1 7 -4 2 p = < . 01 C = . 373 189 TABLE 41 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d T h ree o r One Two Four T o t a l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P er Language b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t E n g l i s h 13 1 5 .9 39 4 7 .6 30 3 6 .5 82 1 0 0 .0 S p a n is h 12 4 6 .2 6 2 3 .1 8 3 0 .8 26 1 0 0 .1 T o t a l 25 23 . I 45 4 1 .7 38 3 5 -2 108 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 1 0 . 8 9 p = < . 0 1 C = .303 190 TABLE 42 AGE AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e iv e d T h ree o r One Two_____ Four T o t a l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Age b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t 2 0 -3 9 11 1 5 -9 33 4 7 -8 25 3 6 .2 69 99 -9 4 0 -8 9 14 3 5 -9 12 3 0 .8 13 3 3 .3 39 100. 0 T o t a l 25 2 3 .1 45 4 1 .7 38 3 5 .2 108 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 6 .0 9 P = .04 C = .230 191 W ith one e x c e p t i o n , th e l a t e r th e g e n e r a t i o n o f th e r e s p o n d e n t th e h i g h e r was th e p r o p o r t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n ts p e r c e i v i n g two to f o u r c l a s s e s , and th e s m a l l e r th e p r o p o r t i o n o f th o s e p e r c e i v i n g o n ly one, a s shown i n T ab le 43- The m odal c a t e g o r y f o r th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n was one c l a s s , f o r th e second g e n e r a t i o n two c l a s s e s , and f o r l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s t h r e e o r f o u r c l a s s e s . Chi s q u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . In a d d i t i o n to t h e i r u s e f u l n e s s i n sam p lin g d e s ig n , th e v a r i o u s r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s d e l i n e a t e d by th e w r i t e r were s e t up b e c a u se o f a b a s i c a ssu m p tio n t h a t s t a t u s o f an a r e a and s t a t u s o f p e r s o n s r e s i d i n g in i t and t h e i r modes o f p e r c e p t i o n were a s s o c i a t e d v a r i a b l e s . Almost h a l f o f a l l r e s p o n d e n ts i n t h e h i g h e r (A and B) and lo w e r (E) r a n k i n g a r e a s c o u ld p e r c e i v e no c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s among Pom ona's Mexican p o p u l a t i o n , w h ile o n ly s l i g h t l y more th a n a t h i r d o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts i n Areas C and D were u n a b le to do so . I t would a p p e a r a s th o ugh p e r s o n s i n th e i n t e r m e d i a t e a r e a s w ere somewhat more c l a s s c o n s c io u s . When we c o n s i d e r th e r e s p o n d e n ts who d i d s t a t e t h e y p e r c e i v e d two o r more s o c i a l c l a s s e s , how ever, a somewhat d i f f e r e n t p i c t u r e em erges. In A reas A and B more 192 TABLE 43 GENERATION AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED G e n e r a tio n Number < o f C la s s e s P e r c e iv e d T o ta l One Two T hree o r Four Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r ~ P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t F i r s t 10 4 7 .6 7 3 3 .3 4 1 9.0 21 99-9 Second 12 1 8 .5 30 4 6 .2 23 3 5 .4 65 1 0 0 .1 L a t e r 3 1 3 .6 8 3 6 .4 11 5 0 .0 22 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 25 2 3 .1 45 4 1 .7 38 35-2 108 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 1 0 .5 5 p = .04 C = .298 TABLE 4 4 OCCUPATION AND NUMBER OP CLASSES PERCEIVED Number o f C la s se s P e rc e iv e d One Two Three o r Pour T o ta l O ccupation Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Mean R e l i e f 2 50.0 __ 2 5 0 .0 4 100.0 2 .0 0 L ab o rers Semi- 10 27.8 11 30.6 15 41 .6 36 100.0 2.22 S k i l l e d S k i l l e d W hite- 7 2 5 .0 10 35-7 11 39-3 28 100.0 2 .1 8 C o lla r 3 15-8 11 5 7 .9 5 26.3 19 10 0.0 2.11 T o ta l 25 c h i sq uare 23.1 - 8.74 45 4 1 .7 P = 38 .02 35-2 C = . 108 274 10 0.0 2.16 i —1 VO -pr 195 num ber o f S p a n is h - la n g u a g e com m unication m edia u t i l i z e d . P e r c e p t i o n o f A nglo C l a s s S y s te m Each r e s p o n d e n t was a ls o a sk e d to d e s c r i b e th e Anglo c l a s s sy ste m by means o f th e q u e s t i o n : "Now, co n s i d e r i n g a l l t h e p e o p le o f Pomona e x c e p t th o s e o f M exican d e s c e n t , how many s o c i a l c l a s s e s would you s a y t h e r e a r e ? " T a b le 45 shows t h a t 33 r e s p o n d e n ts w ere a b le to s p e c i f y t h e number o f c l a s s e s n e i t h e r f o r t h e Mexican g ro u p n o r f o r th e Anglo g ro u p . Of th o s e who c o u ld n o t d e s c r i b e a c l a s s s y s te m s , 6 c o u ld do so f o r th e A nglos, and o f th o s e who c o u ld n o t do so f o r t h e A nglos, 17 c o u ld do so f o r t h e M exicans. Of th o s e who p e r c e i v e d o n ly one c l a s s among t h e M exicans, a lm o s t h a l f (12) gave no answ er c o n c e rn in g Anglo c l a s s e s : o f th o s e who d id , 6 p e r c e i v e d th e same num ber among t h e A nglos, a lth o u g h a lm o s t as many (5) p e r c e i v e d two c l a s s e s among t h e Anglos. The p r o p o r t i o n o f t h o s e p e r c e i v i n g two, t h r e e o r f o u r M exican c l a s s e s who w ere u n a b le t o answ er th e q u e s t io n a b o u t Anglo c l a s s e s w ere r e l a t i v e l y s m a ll: 6 . 7 , 5*9, and 0 .0 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y . Of th o s e who p e r c e i v e d two M exican s o c i a l c l a s s e s , 33*3 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d two c l a s s e s among th e 193 p e rs o n s p e r c e i v e d two c l a s s e s th a n th re e o r f o u r c l a s s e s ; the same i s t r u e in Areas C and D, but th e d i f f e r e n c e i s s l i g h t . In Area E the r e l a t i o n s h i p i s r e v e r s e d , w ith few er p e rs o n s p e r c e i v i n g o n ly two. None o f t h e s e d i f f e r e n ce s, however, re a c h th e .05 l e v e l of s i g n i f i c a n c e . Table 44 shows th e r e l a t i o n s h i p b etw een the number of c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d and th e o c cu p a tio n o f t h e re sp o n d en t (or o f th e h e ad o f h o u seh o ld i f th e re s p o n d e n t was a h o u se w ife ). I t i s seen t h a t l a b o r e r s and s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk ers p e r c e i v e d a mean number o f c l a s s e s ( 2 .2 2 and 2 .1 8 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) h ig h e r th a n th e mean f o r a l l resp o n d e n ts ( 2 .1 6 ) , w h ile s k i l l e d w orkers and w h ite c o l l a r w orkers p e r c e i v e d a mean number o f c l a s s e s ( 2 .1 0 and 2.11 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) low er th a n th e mean f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n ts . Chi sq u a re f o r th e t a b l e re a c h e s th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i cance. This i s th e o n ly s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p found which was i n a d i r e c t i o n o p p o s i t e to t h a t p r e d i c t e d by t h e w r i t e r . There was no a s s o c i a t i o n between num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e iv e d and any o f th e fo llo w in g v a r i a b l e s : sex, number of o r g a n i z a t i o n a l m em berships, t o t a l fa m ily incom e, number of fam ily.m em b ers w ith whom S p a n ish was spo ken o r the 196 TABLE 45 NUMBER OF MEXICAN AND ANGLO CLASSES PERCEIVED Number o f Mexican Number o f C la s s e s P e rc e iv e d Anglo C la s se s Sub- No P e rc e iv e d Five Four T hree Two One T o ta l Answer T o ta l Five - - 1 1 — 1 Four — 4 3 3 10 1 11 Three — - - 26 24 2 52 2 54 Two - - - - 1 15 5 21 2 . 23 One - - 1 - - 6 7 1 8 S u b - t o t a l - - - 32 42 13 91 6 97 No Answer - -* *“ “ 2 3 12 17 33 50 T o ta l . . 4 34 45 25 108 39 147 197 A nglos, 53*3 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d t h r e e c l a s s e s among th e Anglos and 6 . 7 p e r c e n t f o u r c l a s s e s among th e A nglos. Of th o s e who p e r c e i v e d t h r e e M exican c l a s s e s 7 6.5 p e r c e n t a l s o p e r c e i v e d t h r e e among t h e A nglos, w i t h 8 .8 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v i n g f o u r and one c a s e p e r c e i v i n g f i v e among th e A nglos. A ll r e s p o n d e n t s who p e r c e i v e d f o u r c l a s s e s among th e M exicans d i d l i k e w i s e f o r t h e A n g lo s. T ab le 45 p o i n t s o u t th e s t r o n g te n d e n c y f o r Pom ona's M exicans to p e r c e i v e t h r e e s o c i a l c l a s s e s among Pom ona's A n g lo s. Of a l l r e s p o n d e n t s who w ere a b le to answ er th e q u e s t i o n a b o u t Anglo c l a s s e s , 5 6 .7 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d t h r e e Anglo c l a s s e s ; 2 3 .7 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d tw o, 1 1 .3 p e r c e n t p e r c e iv e d f o u r , 8 .2 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d one and 1 .0 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d f i v e . Thus T a b le 45 m a n i f e s t s a s t r o n g te n d e n c y t o p e r c e i v e two s o c i a l c l a s s e s among th e M e x ica n s, w ith a lm o s t as s t r o n g a te n d e n c y to p e r c e i v e a t h r e e c l a s s sy ste m . The te n d e n c y t o p e r c e i v e t h r e e Anglo c l a s s e s , how ever, i s more th a n tw ic e a s s t r o n g a s th e te n d e n c y to p e r c e i v e two Anglo c l a s s e s . W hile 25 r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v e d b u t a s i n g l e s o c i a l c l a s s f o r th e M e x ica n s, o n ly 8 d i d so f o r th e Anglos. Of a l l r e s p o n d e n t s d e s c r i b i n g b o th s y s te m s , 38 p e r c e i v e d 198 more Anglo th a n Mexican c l a s s e s , 51 p e r c e i v e d th e same number, and o n ly 2 p e r c e i v e d more Mexican th a n Anglo c l a s s e s . A t h r e e - c e l l c h i - s q u a r e t a b l e c a l c u l a t e d f o r th e s e d i f f e r e n c e s i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t beyond th e .01 l e v e l . C r i t e r i a o f S o c i a l S t a t u s The r e s e a r c h e r was i n t e r e s t e d i n th e c r i t e r i a u se d by r e s p o n d e n ts i n d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g th e v a r i o u s s o c i a l c l a s s e s . For exam ple, Anglos a r e s a i d t o d i s c r i m i n a t e a g a i n s t M exicans p a r t i a l l y a c c o rd in g to d a rk n e ss o f pigm en t a t i o n . 1 But i n e v a l u a t i n g th e s t a t u s o f M exicans, th e l a t t e r th e m s e lv e s do n o t u se th e c r i t e r i o n o f s k in c o l o r . There was no c a s e o f th e u se o f t h i s c r i t e r i o n i n th e sample i n t e r v i e w e d by t h e w r i t e r . One c r i t e r i o n fo u n d to be im p o r ta n t by o t h e r i n v e s t i g a t o r s , b u t n o t by th e w r i t e r i s r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a . T h is c r i t e r i o n was n o t u s e d by any r e s p o n d e n t i n c h a r a c t e r i z i n g th e M exican-A m erican s o c i a l c l a s s e s , a lth o u g h i t ■^Manuel Gamio, M exican Im m ig ra tio n to th e U n ited S t a t e s (C h icag o: U n i v e r s i t y o f Chicago P r e s s , 19 3 0 ), p. 53. 199 was u s e d tw ic e f o r th e Anglo c l a s s e s . A c tu a lly t h e r e would a p p e a r to be more c o r r e l a t i o n betw een house ty p e and s o c i a l c l a s s t h a n betw een t h e l a t t e r and r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s i n Pomona. Such would a p p e a r t o be th e case b e c a u se o f h o u sin g d i s c r i m i n a t i o n i n e a r l i e r y e a r s . Those who w anted b e t t e r h o u sin g d id n o t move i n t o b e t t e r a r e a s ; t h e y sim p ly b u i l t a b e t t e r house on an empty l o t i n th e same a r e a . The d e s i r e to r e s i d e in th e same a r e a s a s f r i e n d s and r e l a t i v e s h as a l s o been an i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r . On th e o t h e r hand, some M exican f a m i l i e s occupy r e l a t i v e l y p o o r d w e ll in g s i n b e t t e r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s . Each r e s p o n d e n t i n th e w r i t e r ' s sample was asked b r i e f l y to d e s c r i b e th e s o c i a l c l a s s e s he had named. In many c a s e s d e s c r i p t i o n s were g iv e n w i t h o u t s p e c i f i c c l a s s l a b e l s . R esp on dents were n o t alw ays c o n s i s t e n t a b o u t t h e i r use o f c r i t e r i a . Thus, f o r exam ple, th e y m ight make u se o f a g iv e n c r i t e r i o n in d i s t i n g u i s h i n g th e low er c l a s s from th e m id d le c l a s s , y e t d i s t i n g u i s h th e u p p e r c l a s s from th e m id dle c l a s s on an e n t i r e l y d i f f e r e n t b a s i s . The c r i t e r i a u se d by r e s p o n d e n ts i n c h a r a c t e r i z i n g v a r i o u s - s o c i a l c l a s s e s have been c l a s s i f i e d u n d e r a number o f h e a d in g s by th e w r i t e r . T ab le 46 r e v e a l s th e number o f 200 tim e s eac h c r i t e r i o n was u se d by r e s p o n d e n ts i n c h a r a c t e r - i z i n g th e Mexican a n d Anglo c l a s s sy ste m s i n Pomona. Some r e s p o n d e n t s , of c o u r s e , u sed more th a n one c r i t e r i o n . The ty p e s o f c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n s t h a t were c l a s s i f i e d u n d e r each c a t e g o r y o f c r i t e r i a a re as f o llo w s . Economic p o s i t i o n . T h is c a te g o r y r e f e r s to th e p o s s e s s i o n (or l a c k ) o f w e a lth o r o t h e r m a t e r i a l p o s s e s s i o n s , and c r i t e r i a r e f e r r i n g t o s t a n d a r d o f l i v i n g . O c c u p a tio n . This c a t e g o r y r e f e r s e i t h e r to ty p e 2 o f o c c u p a tio n , o r s i t u s o r ty p e of i n d u s t r y . M o b ility o r i e n t a t i o n . Under t h i s h e a d in g have b e en g ro u p ed c r i t e r i a r e l a t i n g to p e r s o n s h a v in g o r l a c k in g an o r i e n t a t i o n to w ard s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , g e n e r a l l y r e f e r r e d to by r e s p o n d e n ts a s "w anting t o g e t a h ea d . " E d u c a tio n . Under t h i s h e ad in g a r e i n c l u d e d th e p o s s e s s i o n o f o r t h e d e s ir e by r e s p o n d e n ts f o r an a d e q u a te e d u c a t i o n e i t h e r f o r th e m se lv e s o r t h e i r c h i l d r e n . Way o f l i f e . Under t h i s h e a d in g have been t a b u l a t e d c r i t e r i a d e s c r i p t i v e o f w hat i s g e n e r a l l y known as 2By " s i t u s " i s meant a s e c t o r o f th e economy, s u c h as i n d u s t r y , a g r i c u l t u r e , commerce, o r d o m e stic s e r v i c e . 201 TABLE 46 CRITERIA USED IN DIFFERENTIATING SOCIAL CLASSES C r i t e r i o n Number o f R esp o n d e n ts Using Given C r i t e r i o n * M exican C la s s e s Anglo C la s s e s Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Economic P o s i t i o n 30 39-5 41 5 1 -3 O ccup ation 16 21 .1 18 2 2 .5 M o b ility O r i e n t a t i o n 14 1 8 .4 12 15-0 E d u c a tio n 12 15-8 12 1 5 .0 Way o f L if e 14 1 8 .4 11 1 3 .8 S o c i a b i l i t y 11 1 4 .5 8 1 0 .0 R e s i d e n t i a l Area - - - - 2 2 .5 T re a tm e n t o f M exicans * " * “ — — 2 2 .5 T o ta l 76 80 ♦Since some r e s p o n d e n ts gave more th a n one c r i t e r i o n , p e r c e n t a g e s do n o t add up t o 100, n o r can t o t a l s be o b t a i n e d by summing f i g u r e s i n "Number" column. 202 " s u b c u l t u r e " o r " s t y l e o f l i f e , " i n c l u d i n g i n t e r g e n e r a t i o n - a l d i f f e r e n c e s , and d e s c r i p t i o n s o f p e r s o n a l b e h a v i o r , su ch as th e way p e o p le " a c t" and d r e s s , e . g . , w h e th e r " r e s p e c t a b ly " o r n o t . S o c i a b i l i t y . Under t h i s h e a d in g have been in c l u d e d c r i t e r i a r e l a t i n g to p e o p l e 's p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n " s o c i a l " e v e n ts and " c i v i c " a c t i v i t i e s ; and t h e i r m em bership i n o r g a n i z a t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g r e f e r e n c e s to th e s t a t u s l e v e l o f Mexican community. The p r e c e d in g c a t e g o r i e s a l l r e f e r t o c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f Mexican c l a s s e s . T here were two c r i t e r i a u se d f o r Anglo c l a s s e s b u t n o t f o r M exican c l a s s e s . These r e f e r to r e s p e c t i v e l y ( l ) th e t r e a t m e n t o f M exicans by A nglos, and (2) a r e a o f r e s i d e n c e . r e s p o n d e n ts w ith r e f e r e n c e to th e m ost im p o r ta n t d i f f e r e n c e s p e r c e i v e d i n th e M exican community w ith th e c r i t e r i a th e y employed i n d i s t i n g u i s h i n g th e s o c i a l c l a s s e s o r l e v e l s , a s shown i n T ab le 47. Those s e e in g a c c u l t u r a t i o n as th e m ost i m p o r t a n t c a t e g o r y o f d i f f e r e n c e s u se d o c c u p a t i o n m ost f r e q u e n t l y among th e c r i t e r i a o f s o c i a l c l a s s . Those r e s p o n d e n ts who p e r c e i v e d c l a s s o r s t a t u s d i f f e r e n c e s and a s s i s t a n c e t o th e I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g to compare th e judgm ents o f TABLE 47 SOCIAL DIFFERENCES PERCEIVED AND CRITERIA USED FOR SOCIAL CLASSES Most Im p o rtan t S o c ia l Economic P o s i ti o n Occupa t i o n M o b ility O r ie n ta t i o n Educa t i o n Way o f L ife S o c ia b i l i t y No D if f e re n c e s P e rc e iv e d No. Per c e n t No. Per c en t No. Per c en t No. Per c en t No. Per c e n t No. Per c en t Sub t o t a l C r i t e r i o n T o ta l A c c u ltu r a t i o n 3 14 .3 6 28.6 4 19.0 3 1 4 .3 3 14.3 2 9.5 21 12 33 C lass o r S ta tu s 11 28 .2 5 1 2 .8 7 1 7 .9 4 10 .3 8 20.5 4 10.3 39 6 45 E d u catio n 3 23*1 3 23.1 1 7-7 4 3 0 .8 1 7 .7 1 7 .7 13 1 14 O ther 4 80.0 — 1 2 0 .0 5 8 13 S u b to ta l 21 26 .9 14 17-9 13 1 6 .7 11 14.1 12 1 5 .4 7 9 .0 78 27 105 No d a ta 9 4 7 .4 2 10.5 1 5 .3 1 5 .3 2 10.5 4 2 1 .0 19 44 63 T o ta l 30 3 0 .9 16 16.5 14 1 4 .4 12 1 2 .4 14 1 4 .4 11 1 1 .3 97 71 168 203 204 a s t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t , u s e d eco n o m ic p o s i t i o n a s a c r i t e r i o n m ore t h a n a n y o t h e r . T h o se p e r c e i v i n g e d u c a t i o n a l d i f f e r e n c e s a s m o st i m p o r t a n t a l s o u s e d e d u c a t i o n a s t h e i r c h i e f c r i t e r i o n o f s o c i a l c l a s s . Members o f d i f f e r e n t o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r i e s t e n d e d t o e m p h a s iz e d i f f e r e n t c r i t e r i a , b u t n o n e o f t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s , shown i n T a b le 48, r e a c h t h e s t a t i s t i c a l l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . T h u s, t h e h i g h e r r a n k i n g t h e o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y , t h e m ore t e n d e n c y t h e r e was t o e m p h a s iz e o c c u p a t i o n , b u t l e s s t e n d e n c y t o e m p h a s iz e e c o n o m ic p o s i t i o n and s o c i a b i l i t y . The m o d a l c a t e g o r y f o r a l l o c c u p a t i o n a l l e v e l s was e co n o m ic p o s i t i o n ; i n a d d i t i o n t h e s k i l l e d w o r k e r s h a d a s t a t i s t i c a l mode i n m o b i l i t y o r i e n t a t i o n an d t h e w h i t e c o l l a r w o r k e r s h a d a s t a t i s t i c a l mode i n o c c u p a t i o n . TABLE 48 OCCUPATION AND CRITERIA USED FOR SOCIAL CLASSES O ccupation C r i t e r i o n Used f o r S o c ia l C la s se s Sub t o t a l No Data T o ta l Economic P o s itio n Occupa t i o n M o b ility O r ie n ta t i o n Educa t i o n Way of L ife S o c ia b i l i t y No. Per c en t No. Per cen t Per No. c en t Per No. cen t No. Per c e n t No. Per c en t R e l i e f 1 5 0.0 1 5 0.0 2 7 9 L ab o rers 10 38.5 2 7 .7 3 H . 5 1 3-8 6 23.1 4 15 .4 26 26 52 S e m i-S k ille d 7 29-2 4 16.7 2 8.3 4 16.7 4 1 6 .7 3 12.5 24 19 43 S k i l l e d 6 26.1 4 1 7 .4 6 26.1 4 17-4 1 4 .3 2 8.7 23 15 38 S k ille d -W h ite C o lla r 6 27 .3 6 27.3 3 13.6 3 13-6 3 13.6 1 4.5 22 4 26 T o ta l 30 16 14 12 14 11 97 71 168 CHAPTER VI SELF-PERCEPTION BY MEXICAN-AMERICANS The p r e c e d i n g c h a p t e r d e a l t w ith th e s o c i a l - c l a s s s t r u c t u r e o f Pom ona's M exican-A m erican community as p e r c e i v e d by th e members o f t h a t community. The p r e s e n t c h a p t e r i s c o n c e rn e d w ith each i n f o r m a n t 's p e r c e p t i o n o f h i s own p la c e i n t h a t s t r u c t u r e . S e l f - P l a c e m e n t i n C la s s S t r u c t u r e A fte r b e in g a sk e d to d e s c r i b e t h e M exican-A m erican c l a s s s t r u c t u r e o f Pomona, e a c h re s p o n d e n t was a sk ed "Which s o c i a l c l a s s would you p u t y o u r s e l f i n ? " I n t e r e s t i n g l y enough, l 4 p e rs o n s who w ere u n a b le to p e r c e i v e c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s w i t h i n th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n (o r a t l e a s t who s t a t e d t h e y were u n a b le to p e r c e i v e such d i f f e r e n c e s ) , were a b l e to s t a t e t h e i r own s o c i a l c l a s s p o s i t i o n , as t h e y p e r c e i v e d I t . In such c a s e s i t can o n ly be assum ed t h a t t h e y a re p l a c i n g th e m s e lv e s i n a c l a s s o f 206 th e Anglo o r g e n e r a l c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , o r e l s e th e y b e l i e v e t h a t a l l M exicans a r e a t th e same l e v e l i n t h e Anglo o r g e n e r a l c l a s s s t r u c t u r e . S e l f - p e r c e i v e d c l a s s l e v e l s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n T ab le 49. P e rs o n s c l a s s i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s a s u p p e r c l a s s saw th e m s e lv e s a s b e lo n g i n g t o t h e to p c l a s s i n e i t h e r a tw o -o r t h r e e - c l a s s sy s te m . P e rs o n s c l a s s i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s a s m id d le c l a s s p r e d o m in a n tly (44 o u t o f 59 c a s e s ) p l a c e d th e m s e lv e s e i t h e r i n th e to p c l a s s o f a tw o- c l a s s sy stem o r i n th e medium c l a s s o f a t h r e e - c l a s s s y s tem . P e rs o n s c l a s s i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s a s lo w e r c l a s s m a in ly ( l y o u t o f 19 c a s e s ) p e r c e i v e d th e m s e lv e s e i t h e r a s members o f a s i n g l e c o lo n y -w id e s o c i a l c l a s s o r as b e lo n g in g to t h e b otto m c l a s s o f e i t h e r a t w o - c l a s s o r a t h r e e - c l a s s sy s te m . T a b le 49 shows t h a t o f r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v i n g a t w o - c l a s s sy stem r o u g h l y e q u a l p r o p o r t i o n s p l a c e d them s e l v e s i n t h e to p l e v e l (53*7 p e r c e n t ) and i n th e b ottom l e v e l (4 6 .3 p e r c e n t ) . Of r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v i n g a t h r e e - c l a s s s y s te m , th e o v erw helm ing m a j o r i t y p l a c e d th e m s e lv e s i n t h e m id d le l e v e l ( 8 1 .8 p e r c e n t ) . The f o u r r e s p o n d e n t s who p e r c e i v e d f o u r s o c i a l c l a s s e s a l l p l a c e d th e m s e lv e s i n one o f th e two m id d le l e v e l s . Of p e r s o n s p e r c e i v i n g a TABLE 49 CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED C l a s s S e l f - P l a c e m ent S i n g l e C l a s s Two - C l a s s S ystem T h re e - C l a s s System F o u r - C l a s s S ystem T o t a l Top C l a s s B ottom C l a s s Top C l a s s M id d le C la s s B ottom C l a s s S eco n d C l a s s from Top S econd C l a s s from Bottom No. P e r c e n t No. P e r c e n t P e r No. c e n t No P e r . c e n t No. P e r c e n t No. P e r c e n t No P e r . c e n t P e r No. c e n t No. P e r c e n t U pper __ _ _ _ _ — 1 33-3 2 66.7 3 100.0 M id d le 3 ■5.6 19 35-2 6 11.1 — - - 25 4 6 .3 — - - 1 1 .7 54 100.1 W orking 8 4 0 .0 - - - - 9 4 5 .0 - - 1 5 .0 — 5 .0 — 2 10.0 20 100.0 Lower 4 30.8 — — --- 5 38.5 4 3 0 .8 13 100.1 T o t a l 15 16.7 20 2 2 .2 20 2 2 .2 2 2 .2 26 28.9 4 4 .4 1 1 .1 2 2 .2 90 10 0 .2 Mean U pper 2.6 7 M id d le 2 .4 4 W orking 1 . 85 Lower 2 .0 0 c h i sq u a re = 2 4.5 2 p = < . 0 1 C = .430 r o o 00 209 s i n g l e c l a s s system , 4 0 . 0 p e r c e n t were u n a b le t o s t a t e t h e name o f t h e c l a s s o r c h a r a c t e r i z e i t i n any way; o f t h o s e p e r c e i v i n g two c l a s s e s , 8 - 9 p e r c e n t were u n a b le to p l a c e th e m s e lv e s w i t h i n i t and 2 . 9 p e r c e n t o f t h o s e p e r c e i v i n g a t h r e e - c l a s s sy ste m , w h ile t h e r e were no p e r so n s p e r c e i v i n g a f o u r - c l a s s sy s te m who w ere u n a b le to p l a c e th e m s e lv e s i n t h e system . The c h i sq u a re f o r Table 49 i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .0 1 l e v e l . Of t h e w r i t e r ' s t o t a l sam p le o f 147, 40 r e s p o n d e n t s , o r 27-2 p e r c e n t were u n a b le o r u n w i l l i n g t o c a t e g o r i z e t h e i r own s o c i a l c l a s s m em bership. Of th e 107 r e s p o n d e n t s who were a b l e and w i l l i n g to do so, 3 o r 2 .8 p e r c e n t c l a s s i f i e d th e m s e lv e s a s u p p er c l a s s , 59 o r 55-1 p e r c e n t as m id d le c l a s s , 23 o r 2 1 .5 p e r c e n t as w o rk in g c l a s s , and 16 o r 1 5 -0 p e r c e n t a s lo w er c l a s s . The an sw ers o f an a d d i t i o n a l 6 r e s p o n d e n t s , c o n s t i t u t i n g 5 -6 p e r c en t w ere c l a s s i f i e d as " o t h e r . " The M exicans o f Pomona, as com pared w ith C e n t e r s ' n a tio n w id e sam ple, were l e s s l i k e l y to c a l l th e m s e lv e s u p p e r c l a s s o r w orkin g c l a s s , b u t more l i k e l y to c a l l th e m s e lv e s m id d le o r lo w e r c l a s s . In C e n t e r s ' s t u d y th e p e r c e n t a g e s w e re : u p p e r c l a s s , 4j 210 m id d le , 26; w orking, 52; and " d o n 't know," 3*^ The w r i t e r ' s p e rc e n ta g e o f 27.2 f o r th e " d o n 't know" c a te g o ry , as compared t o C e n te r s ' p e rc e n ta g e o f o n ly 3 can be a t t r i b u t e d n o t o n ly to g r e a t e r i n a b i l i t y to answer th e q u e s t io n , b u t a l s o to t h e f a c t t h a t in Pomona re sp o n d e n ts were n o t f o r c e d to choose a c a te g o r y . R espondents who c l a s s i f i e d th em se lv e s as u p p er, m id d le , w orking o r low er c l a s s were i n a number o f r e s p e c t s s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t from th o se who c o u ld n o t answ er the q u e s t io n o r whose answ er co uld n o t be c l a s s i f i e d u n d er one o f the f o u r c l a s s e s m entioned. Persons o f th e l a t t e r c a te g o r y had low er incom es, were o l d e r , more o f them p r e f e r r e d S panish f o r the i n t e r v i e w , th e y had l e s s s c h o o lin g , and o f the men few er were v e t e r a n s . And u n d e r s t a n d a b l y , a h i g h e r p r o p o r t i o n were a ls o a b le to p e r c e iv e c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s and p e r c e iv e d a l a r g e r number o f c l a s s e s . These d i f f e r e n c e s , a l l s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l , a re shown i n T a b le s 50, 51, 5 2 , 53, 5^, 55, and 5 6 . In a d d i t i o n , r e s p o n d e n ts who d i d n o t p la c e th e m se lv e s i n one o f th e f o u r c l a s s e s had l e s s s k i l l e d o c c u p a tio n s , were more o f 1R ic h a rd C e n te rs , The Psychology o f S o c ia l C la s se s ( P r i n c e t o n : P rin c e to n U n i v e r s i ty P r e s s , 1 9 ^ 9 ), P* 72. 211 TABLE 50 INCOME AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS T o ta l P e r c e iv e Annual Own C lass Do Not Own P e rc e iv e C la ss T o ta l F am ily Num- Income b er Per cent Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Under $4,000 14 43.8 18 5 6 .2 32 10 0 .0 4 ,0 0 0 - 5 j 999 32 74.4 11 2 5 .6 43 10 0 .0 6 ,0 0 0 - 7 ,9 9 9 28 75.7 9 2 4 .3 37 1 0 0 .0 8,000 o r More 22 88.0 3 1 2 .0 25 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 96 70.1 41 2 9 .9 137 100.0 c h i square = 15.25 P = < .01 C = • 317 212 TABLE 51 AGE AND GLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS Age P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s Do N ot P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s T o t a l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num- P e r b e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t 20-39 66 7 7 .6 19 2 2 .4 85 10 0.0 40-89 35 5 6 .5 27 43 .5 62 100.0 T o t a l 101 6 8 .7 46 31•3 147 100.0 c h i s q u a r e = 7 .5 4 p = < . 01 C = .221 213 TABLE 52 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS Language P e r c e iv e Own C la s s Do Not Own P e r c e iv e C la s s T o ta l Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t E n g lis h 81 7 7 .9 23 22.1 104 100.0 S p a n ish 20 4 6 .5 23 53-5 43 100.0 T o ta l 101 6 8.7 46 3 1 .3 147 10 0.0 c h i s q u a re = 13 -7 8 P = < .01 C = .293 214 TABLE 53 VETERANS' STATUS AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e r c e iv e Do Not P e r c e iv e Own C la s s Own C la s s T o ta l V e t e r a n s ' S t a t u s Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t V e t e r a n s 27 93-1 2 6 .9 29 100.0 Non- V e t e r a n s 23 63*9 13 36.1 36 100.0 T o ta l 50 7 6 .9 15 23.1 65 1 0 0 .0 chi square =6.18 p = .02 215 TABLE 54 SCHOOLING AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e rc e iv e Do Not P e rc e iv e Own C lass Own C la s s T o ta l Years o f Nuin- Per Num Per Num- P e r S c h o o lin g b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t 0-8 28 47-5 31 5 2 .5 59 1 0 0 .0 9-11 38 8O.9 9 19-1 47 1 0 0 .0 12 o r More 35 85 .4 6 1 4 .6 41 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 101 6 8 .7 46 31-3 147 1 0 0 .0 chi square = 20.77 p =<.01 C = *352 216 TABLE 55 CONSCIOUSNESS OF CLASS DIVISIONS AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s Do N ot P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s T o t a l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t P e r c e i v e C l a s s D i v i s i o n s 75 9 0 .4 8 9*6 83 100.0 Do N o t P e r c e i v e C l a s s D i v i s i o n s 26 4 0 .6 38 59*4 64 100.0 T o t a l 101 6 8 .7 46 3 1 -3 147 100.0 c h i s q u a r e = 39*42 p = < . 0 1 C = .460 217 TABLE 56 NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e i v e d P e r c e iv e Own C la s s Do Not Own P e r c e i v e C la s s T o t a l Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t One 15 6 0 .0 10 4 0 .0 25 1 0 0 .0 Two 40 8 8 .9 5 1 1 .1 45 1 0 0 .0 T h re e o r Four 35 92.1 3 7 . 9 38 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 90 8 3 -3 18 1 6.7 108 1 0 0 .0 chi square = 12.69 p = < .01 C = .324 218 th e im m ig ra n t t h a n o f th e A m e ric an -b o rn g e n e r a t i o n s , and spoke S p a n is h to a l a r g e r number o f f a m ily members. These d i f f e r e n c e s , a l l s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l , a re p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le s 57, 58> and 59* P e rso n s who had been u p w a rd ly o r downw ardly m o b ile w ere more o f t e n a b le t o s t a t e c l a s s th a n t h e non m obile r e s p o n d e n t s ( s e e T ab le 6 0 ). S e l f - P e r c e p t i o n and O th e r P e r c e p t i o n s o f R e s p o n d e n ts The r e s e a r c h e r was i n t e r e s t e d i n any p o s s i b l e r e l a t i o n s h i p s b etw een t h e m anner i n w hich r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v e th e m s e lv e s i n th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e and c e r t a i n o t h e r p e r c e p t i o n s o f r e s p o n d e n t s . I t was h y p o t h e s iz e d , f o r ex am p le, t h a t th e h i g h e r th e s e l f - p e r c e i v e d s o c i a l c l a s s t h e l a r g e r w ould be th e mean num ber o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d by members o f t h a t " c l a s s . " In T ab le 49 i t was shown t h a t p e r s o n s i d e n t i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s as u p p e r c l a s s p e r c e i v e d a mean o f 2 .6 7 c l a s s e s ; t h e means f o r t h e o t h e r s e l f - p e r c e i v e d c l a s s e s were m id d le , 2 .4 4 c l a s s e s ; w o rk in g , I .85 c l a s s e s ; and lo w e r, 2 .0 0 c l a s s e s . A ll p e r sons i d e n t i f y i n g a s u p p e r c l a s s w ere a b le t o s t a t e th e number o f c l a s s e s th e y p e r c e i v e d , w i t h 8 .5 p e r c e n t o f th e 219 TABLE 57 OCCUPATION AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e r c e i v e Do N ot P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s Own C l a s s T o t a l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r O c c u p a t i o n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t R e l i e f 3 3 3-3 6 6 6 .7 9 1 0 0 .0 L a b o r e r s 29 6 1 .7 18 3 8 .3 47 1 0 0 .0 S e m i - S k i l l e d 27 7 3 .0 10 2 7 .0 37 1 0 0 .0 S k i l l e d 24 7 0 .6 10 2 9 .4 34 1 0 0 .0 W h ite C o l l a r 18 9 0 .0 2 1 0 .0 20 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 101 6 8 .7 46 3 1 .3 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 11. 04 p = .0 3 C = .26 4 220 TABLE 58 GENERATION AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS G e n e r a t i o n P e r c e i v e Own C l a s s Do N o t Own P e r c e i v e C l a s s T o t a l Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t F i r s t 15 4 6 .9 17 5 3-1 32 1 0 0 .0 S e c o n d 64 7 4 .4 22 2 5.6 86 1 0 0 .0 L a t e r 22 7 5 -9 7 2 4 .1 29 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 101 6 8 .7 46 3 1 .3 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 9 * 1 3 P = *02 C - .242 221 TABLE 59 NUMBER OP FAMILY MEMBERS WITH W HOM SPANISH SPOKEN AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e r c e i v e Do Not P e r c e i v e N um ber o f Own C l a s s Own C l a s s T o t a l F a m i l y Num P e r Num P e r Num P e r M em bers b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t 0 -2 57 6 2 .6 34 37-4 91 1 0 0 .0 3 -4 44 7 8 .6 12 2 1 .4 56 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 101 6 8 .7 46 3 1 -3 14-7 1 0 0 .0 chi square =4.05 p = .04 222 TABLE 60 MOBILITY AND CLASS SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS P e rc e iv e Do Not P e r c e iv e Own C la s s Own C la s s T o t a l Type o f M o b i l it y Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Upward 45 7 6 . 3 14 2 3 .7 59 1 0 0 .0 None 25 5 4 .3 21 4 5 .7 46 1 0 0 .0 Downward 30 7 5 . 0 10 2 5 .0 40 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 1 0 0 6 9 - 0 45 3 1 .0 145 1 0 0 .0 chi square =6.70 p = .03 C = .210 223 m id d le c l a s s u n a b le to do so, 1 3 -0 p e r c e n t o f th e w orking c l a s s and 1 8 .8 p e r c e n t o f th e lo w er c l a s s u n a b le to do so. Of p e rs o n s u n a b le to s t a t e th e s o c i a l c l a s s t o w hich th e y b e l i e v e d t h e y b e lo n g e d , 7 0 .0 p e r c e n t w ere u n a b le to s t a t e th e number o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s t h e y p e r c e i v e d i n th e Mexican community. I f th e r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s a r e d ic h o to m iz e d i n t o th e h i g h e r - r a n k i n g (A, B, C), and lo w e r - r a n k in g (D and E ), i t i s se en ( in T able 6 l ) t h a t p e rs o n s i n th e h i g h e r ra n k in g a r e a s ra n k th e m s e lv e s h i g h e r as to s o c i a l c l a s s . VJhile 7 1 .9 p e r c e n t o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts i n th e h i g h e r - r a n k i n g a r e a s p e r c e i v e d th e m s e lv e s as u p p e r o r m iddle c l a s s , o n ly 4 3 .2 p e r c e n t o f th o s e i n th e lo w e r - r a n k in g a r e a s d id so. On th e o t h e r h an d , w h ile 29*7 p e r c e n t o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts i n th e lo w e r - r a n k in g a r e a s th o u g h t th e y were lo w e r c l a s s , o n ly 7.8 p e r c e n t o f th o s e i n th e h i g h e r - r a n k i n g a r e a s th o u g h t so . Chi s q u a re f o r T ab le 61 i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . A l l s o u r c e s c o n s u l t e d by t h e w r i t e r . a r e i n a g r e e m e n t t h a t o c c u p a t i o n i s a n i m p o r t a n t , i f n o t t h e m o st i m p o r t a n t , c r i t e r i o n u s e d by M e x ic a n s i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s i n e v a l u a t i n g t h e i r own s t a t u s a n d t h a t o f o t h e r s . TABLE 6 l RESIDENTIAL AREA AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT A rea C la s s i S e l f - P l a c e m e n t ? r - r t - j ,1- T o t a l U pper M id d le W orking Low er Num' b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r Num- c e n t b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t A, B, and C 1 1. 6 45 7 0 .3 13 20.3 5 7-8 64 10 0 .0 D a n d E 2 5 .4 14 3 7 .8 10 27.0 11 29.7 37 99-9 T o t a l 3 3-0 59 5 8 .4 23 2 2 .8 16 15.8 101 100.0 c h i s q u a r e = 10.59 p = < .01 C = .308 ro ro Simmons b e l i e v e s , f o r exam ple, t h a t " O c c u p a tio n a l s t a t u s i s o r d i n a r i l y s u f f i c i e n t t o d e te r m in e m em bership i n one p c l a s s o r th e o t h e r . " I t may be t r u e i n f a c t o f Am erican •3 s o c i e t y i n g e n e r a l . Thus s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n s h o u ld be c l o s e l y r e l a t e d t o t h e r e l a t i v e r a n k in g o f o c c u p a t i o n s . The w r i t e r h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t i n Pomona th e h i g h e r th e r a n k i n g o f th e o c c u p a ti o n o f th e r e s p o n d e n t , t h e h i g h e r he w ould r a n k h i m s e l f a s to s o c i a l c l a s s . D ata i n s u p p o r t o f t h i s h y p o t h e s i s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le 62 where i t i s se e n t h a t f o r e v e r y o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y , th e p e r c e n t a g e o f p e r s o n s c l a s s i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s a s m id d le c l a s s i s h i g h e r t h a n t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f th o s e c l a s s i f y i n g th e m s e lv e s a s w orking c l a s s , w hich i n t u r n i s h i g h e r th a n t h a t f o r lo w er c l a s s ( e x c e p t i n t h e c a s e s o f w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e rs and th o s e on r e l i e f ) . W ith r e f e r e n c e to th e m id d le , w orkin g and l o w e r - c l a s s c a t e g o r i e s , w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e rs r a t e d th e m s e lv e s t h e h i g h e s t , l a b o r e r s , t h e l o w e s t . The sem i- 20 z z i e Simmons, "A m ericans and M exican A m ericans i n S o u th T exas" ( u n p u b lis h e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , H a rv ard U n i v e r s i t y , 1 9 5 2 ), p . 358. ^ P r o f e s s o r Edward C. McDonagh p u r p o r t s t h a t o c c u p a t i o n te n d s t o be a t l e a s t t h e " a d j e c t i v e " i f n o t t h e "noun" o f s o c i a l c l a s s i n Am erica (S em inar l e c t u r e , U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , J a n u a r y 10, i 9 6 0 ). TABLE 62 OCCUPATION AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT C la ss S e lf - Placem ent T o ta l Upper Middle Working Lower Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per O ccupation b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c en t b e r c e n t R e l i e f _ K L L „ 1 3 3 .3 _ ^ — i 2 6 6 .7 3 1 0 0 .0 L ab o re rs - - 13 4 4 .8 9 3 1 .0 7 24.1 29 99-9 S e m i-S k ille d 1 3-7 17 6 2 .9 5 18.5 4 1 4 .8 27 99-9 S k i l l e d 1 4 .2 15 62.5 . 7 29.2 1 4 .2 24 100.1 White C o lla r 1 5 .6 13 72.2 2 l l . l 2 1 1 .1 18 10 0 .0 T o ta l 3 3-0 59 58 .4 23 2 2 .8 16 15.8 101 100.0 2 26 227 s k i l l e d w o r k e rs , h ow ev er, r a t e d th e m s e lv e s on t h e average h i g h e r t h a n th e s k i l l e d w o rk e rs and a l s o had a lo w e r p e r c e n ta g e o f r e s p o n d e n t s i n th e n o - d a t a c a t e g o r y . Chi s q u a r e f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . Two f a c t o r s c l o s e l y r e l a t e d to o c c u p a t i o n were n o t a s s o c i a t e d w ith p e r c e p t i o n o f o n e 's own c l a s s p o s i t i o n : employment s t a b i l i t y and incom e. N e i t h e r s t e a d i n e s s of employment n o r t o t a l fa m ily incom e a f f e c t e d r e s p o n d e n t s ' p e r c e p t i o n s o f t h e i r own s t a t u s . The r e s e a r c h e r h y p o t h e s iz e d t h a t a r e s p o n d e n t 's d e g re e o f o r i e n t a t i o n to w ard M exican c u l t u r e w ould i n f l u e n ce h i s p e r c e p t i o n o f h i m s e l f i n th e s t a t u s s t r u c t u r e . The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s c o n s i d e r e d h e r e a s i n d i c a t i n g the d e g re e o f o r i e n t a t i o n t o M exican c u l t u r a l v a lu e s in c lu d e s i z e o f f a m i l y , g e n e r a t i o n , ag e and se x , v e t e r a n ' s s t a t u s , r e l i g i o u s a f f i l i a t i o n , m em bership i n v o l u n t a r y o r g a n i z a t i o n s , s c h o o lin g and u se o f t h e S p a n ish l a n g u a g e . The w r i t e r c o u ld f i n d no a s s o c i a t i o n betw een any o f t h e s e f a c t o r s and s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n o f t h e c l a s s sy ste m , e x c e p t y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g and la n g u a g e o f i n t e r v i e w . The o v e r a l l I m p r e s s io n o f T able 63> th e c h i square f o r w hich i s n o n s i g n i f i c a n t , i s t h a t i n s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n a s TABLE 63 GENERATION AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT C lass S e lf-P la c e m e n t_____________________ Upper Middle Working Lower T o ta l Num- P er Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per G e n e ra tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t F i r s t 6 4 0 .0 5 33.3 4 26.7 15 100.0 Second 2 3.1 42 65.6 11 17.2 9 14.1 64 100 .0 L a te r 1 4 .5 11 50.0 7 31.8 3 13 .6 22 99.9 T o ta l 3 3-0 59 5 8 .4 23 2 2 .8 16 1 5 .8 101 100.0 r o r o 00 229 t o s o c i a l c l a s s l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s a r e i n an i n t e r m e d i a t e p o s i t i o n b e tw e e n t h e f i r s t a n d s e c o n d g e n e r a t i o n s . T h e r e i s a t e n d e n c y ( a l s o n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t ) f o r y o u n g e r p e r s o n s t o g r a n t t h e m s e l v e s h i g h e r s t a t u s . The m e d ia n a g e o f t h o s e r a t i n g t h e m s e l v e s u p p e r c l a s s i s 3 4 .5 ; m i d d l e c l a s s , 3 4 .2 ; w o r k i n g c l a s s , 3 5 -0 ; a n d l o w e r c l a s s , 3 9 -5 . The w r i t e r o r i g i n a l l y h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e h i g h e r t h e s e l f - p e r c e i v e d s o c i a l c l a s s , t h e g r e a t e r w o u ld b e t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s r e p o r t i n g P r o t e s t a n t a n d no r e l i g i o u s a f f i l i a t i o n . The s m a l l p e r c e n t a g e o f P r o t e s t a n t s i n t h e w r i t e r ' s s a m p le make d i f f i c u l t , i f n o t i m p o s s i b l e , t h e t e s t i n g o f t h i s h y p o t h e s i s . I n a n y c a s e t h e w r i t e r ' s d a t a sh o w ed no t e n d e n c i e s i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e h y p o t h e s i s . The w r i t e r h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e m ore y e a r s o f s c h o o l i n g an i n d i v i d u a l h a d , t h e h i g h e r w o u ld b e t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f h i s o c c u p y i n g h i g h s o c i a l s t a t u s . I t was f u r t h e r h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e h i g h e r t h e s o c i a l c l a s s , t h e h i g h e r w o u ld b e t h e m ean y e a r s o f s c h o o l i n g f o r i n d i v i d u a l s i n t h a t c l a s s . T a b l e 64 r e l a t e s e a c h i n d i v i d u a l ' s s e l f - p l a c e m e n t i n t h e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e t o t h e n u m b e r o f y e a r s o f 230 s c h o o lin g t h a t i n d i v i d u a l h ad. I t w i l l be seen t h a t h ig h s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n i s a s s o c i a t e d w ith a h ig h amount o f s c h o o lin g . The l e s s e d u c a tio n a p e rs o n h a d , th e l e s s l i k e l y he was to c o n s i d e r h i m s e l f m idd le o r u p p e r c l a s s . The m edian number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g f o r th o s e c o n s i d e r in g th e m s e lv e s u p p e r c l a s s was 1 2 .0 ; f o r m id d le c l a s s , 1 0 .8 ; f o r w orking c l a s s , 9 * 7i and f o r th e lo w e r c l a s s , 8 .2 . The c h i s q u a re f o r . t h i s t a b l e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . The l e a s t s c h o o le d g ro u p ( th e s e w ith from 0 to 8 y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g ) w ere th e m ost l i k e l y to p e r c e i v e one s i n g l e c l a s s f o r th e M exican-A m erican g ro u p , o r e l s e n o t be a b le to p l a c e th e m s e lv e s a t a l l . Of t h i s c a te g o r y 49*2 p e r c e n t w ere u n a b le t o s t a t e th e s o c i a l c l a s s to w hich th e y b e l i e v e d th e y b e l o n g e d . . Thus we may assume t h a t a b i l i t y to have s o c i a l c l a s s p e r c e p t i o n i s to a c o n s i d e r a b l e e x t e n t d e p en d e n t upon th e amount o f s c h o o lin g . I t was th e l e a s t e d u c a te d r e s p o n d e n ts who were l e a s t a b le to g iv e th e w r i t e r i n f o r m a ti o n a b o u t s o c i a l c l a s s . Thus any d e s c r i p t i o n o f s o c i a l c l a s s o b t a i n e d by th e w r i t e r from h i s r e s p o n d e n ts i s b i a s e d i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f th e p e r c e p t i o n s o f th e b e t t e r e d u c a te d M e x ican -A m erican s. S in c e th e a b i l i t y to speak E n g li s h f l u e n t l y , and TABLE. 64 SCHOOLING AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT Years o f S chooling C lass S e lf -Placem ent T o ta l Upper Middle Working Lower Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t 0-8 _ _ 11 3 9 .3 8 28 .6 9 32.1 28 10 0.0 9-11 1 2.6 24 6 3 .2 9 23.7 4 10.5 38 10 0.0 12 o r More 2 5-7 24 6 8 .6 6 17-1 3 8 .6 .35 100 .0 T o ta l 3 3-0 59 5 8 .4 23 2 2 .8 16 i 15-8 101 10 0.0 Median 1 2 .0 1 0 .8 9-7 8 .2 c h i sq uare = 10.55 P = .03 C = .308 r o oo M 232 an o r i e n t a t i o n tow ard American c u l t u r e a r e p r e r e q u i s i t e s f o r upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y I n o u r s o c i e t y , we w ould ex p ec t t h a t t h e s e v a r i a b l e s would be a s s o c i a t e d . Thus th e w r i t e r h y p o th e s iz e d t h a t p e r s o n s p r e f e r r i n g to use E n g li s h f o r .... th e i n t e r v i e w would have a h i g h e r s o c i a l c l a s s p o s i t i o n and t h a t th e h i g h e r t h e c l a s s , th e g r e a t e r would be th e p r o p o r t i o n o f E n g lis h s p e a k e r s i n t h a t c l a s s . T ab le 65 I n d i c a t e s t h a t th e E n g li s h - s p e a k in g r e s p o n d e n ts were more l i k e l y to c a l l th e m se lv e s u p p e r o r m id d le c l a s s (6 2 .8 p e r c e n t ) , th e S p a n is h -s p e a k in g r e s p o n d e n ts somewhat more l i k e l y to c a l l th e m s e lv e s w ork ing o r lo w e r c l a s s (57-1 p e r c e n t ) . The c h i s q u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e I s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . W ith r e f e r e n c e to languages spoken i n th e home, th e w r i t e r o r i g i n a l l y h y p o th e s iz e d t h a t p e r s o n s who spoke E n g lis h t o p a r e n t s , spou se and c h i l d r e n and whose c h il d r e n spoke E n g li s h to them, would on th e a v e ra g e p l a c e them s e l v e s h i g h e r i n th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e th a n th o s e who spoke S p a n ish (o r b o th la n g u a g e s , e x c e p t i n th e c ase o f lang uage spoken to p a r e n t s ) . In each o f th e f o u r r e l a t i o n s h i p s th e te n d e n c y was I n th e e x p e c te d d i r e c t i o n , b u t.n o n e o f th e r e l a t i o n s h i p s was s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . V TABLE 65 L A N G U A G E PREFERENCE A N D CLASS SELF-PLACEM ENT Language C lass S e lf-P la c e m e n t T o ta l . . . . Upper M iddle Working Lower Num h e r Per c en t Num b e r Per Num- c e n t b e r Per cen t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t E n g lish 2 2.5 52 6 4 .2 18 22.2 9 11.1 81 100 .0 S panish 1 5 .0 7 3 5 .0 5 25.0 7 35-0 20 100.0 T o ta l 3 3 .0 59 5 8 .4 23 2 2 .8 16 15.8 101 10 0 .0 c h i square = 4.61 p = .04 C = .210 233 234 The w r i t e r o r i g i n a l l y h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t t h e h i g h e r t h e s e l f - p e r c e i v e d s o c i a l c l a s s , t h e s m a l l e r w o u ld be t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f p e r s o n s r e p o r t i n g t h e u s e o f S p a n i s h - l a n g u a g e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s m e d i a . No r e l a t i o n s h i p was f o u n d . CHAPTER VII SOCIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY I n t r o d u c t i o n In t h i s s t u d y o f Pom ona's M exican-A m erican com m u n ity , th e r e s e a r c h e r h a s i n v e s t i g a t e d b o th h o r i z o n t a l and v e r t i c a l m o b i l i t y , b u t w i t h e m p h a sis on t h e l a t t e r . V e r t i c a l m o b i l i t y h a s b een m e a su re d h e r e e n t i r e l y i n te rm s o f o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y . O th e r ty p e s o f m o b i l i t y ( e . g . , e t h n i c ) have been c o n s i d e r e d b u t a r e much more d i f f i c u l t t o m e a su re . The w r i t e r s e t up a s th e c r i t e r i o n f o r upward m o b i l i t y th e f o l l o w i n g : i f a r e s p o n d e n t was i n a h i g h e r o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y (th e o r d e r from h i g h e r t o lo w e r b e in g a s f o l l o w s : w h ite c o l l a r , s k i l l e d , s e m i s k i l l e d , u n s k i l l e d ) t h a n h i s f a t h e r he was c o n s i d e r e d t o have been u p w a rd ly m o b ile . T h is m easure o f m o b i l i t y i s commonly e m p lo y e d .1 I f th e r e s p o n d e n t was a n o n -em p lo y ed h o u s e w if e , ■^Gosta C a r l s s o n , S o c i a l M o b i l i t y and C la s s S t r u c t u r e (Lund: C. W . K. G le e r u p , 1 9 5 8 ), p p . 5 8 -1 2 0 . 235 236 i t was th e o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y o f th e h e ad o f th e h o u s e h o l d w hich was m easu red a g a i n s t h e r f a t h e r ' s . In c o n s i d e r i n g th e t o p i c o f v e r t i c a l o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y , t h e r e s e a r c h e r exam ined th e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a tio n to r e s p o n d e n t 's e d u c a t i o n and t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f th e l a t t e r to h i s o c c u p a t i o n . W ith r e f e r e n c e to th e p r e - e d u c a t i o n a l s t e p T a b le 66 i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e h i g h e r t h e o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y o f th e f a t h e r , th e h i g h e r t h e e d u c a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y o f th e r e s p o n d e n t , e x c e p t t h a t c h i l d r e n o f s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk e rs h ad a much lo w e r m ed ian number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g ( 5 -2 ) th a n d id t h e c h i l d r e n o f l a b o r e r s ( 8 . 8 ) . The p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t th e d i f f e r e n c e s i n th e t a b l e , a s c a l c u l a t e d by t h e c h i s q u a r e t e c h n i q u e , a r e due t o chance i s .45- The n u l l h y p o t h e s i s t h a t r e s p o n d e n t 's s c h o o l in g i s in d e p e n d e n t o f f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a t i o n c a n n o t t h e r e f o r e be r e j e c t e d . The p o s t - e d u c a t i o n a l s t e p h a s a l r e a d y been c o n s i d e r e d i n C h a p te r IV w here i t was shown (T a b le 16) t h a t t h e r e i s a h ig h d e g re e o f a s s o c i a t i o n betw een r e s p o n d e n t 's s c h o o l in g and o c c u p a ti o n (a c h i s q u a r e o f 1 7 *6 6 , s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l ) . When b o th s t e p s a r e c o n s i d e r e d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y , a s i n T a b le 6 7 , th e c h i TABLE 66 FATHERS1 OCCUPATION AND RESPONDENTS' SCHOOLING Years o f S chooling T o ta l 0-8 9-11 12 o r More F a t h e r 1s Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per O ccupation b e r c en t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c en t Median L abo rer 31 37-3 30 36.1 22 26.5 83 99-9 8 .8 Semi- S k i l l e d 9 6 0 .0 3 2 0 .0 3 2 0 .0 15 10 0.0 5 -2 S k i l l e d 11 36.7 11 36.7 8 26.7 30 100.1 8 .9 W h ite -C o lla r 7 4 1 .2 3 17-6 7 4 1 .2 17 10 0 .0 9 .0 T o ta l 58 4 0 .0 47 32.4 4o 27.6 145 100.0 chi. square = 5*58 P = -45 ro U ) -s i 238 TABLE 67 FATHERS' OCCUPATION, RESPONDENTS' SCHOOLING AND RESPONDENTS' OCCUPATION F a t h e r s ' O ccupation and R e sp o n d e n ts' R e s p o n d e n ts' R e l i e f L a b o re rs S e m i-S k ille d O ccu pation S k i l l e d White C o l l a r T o tal Y ears o f S ch o o lin g Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per cen t L a b o re rs and S e m i- S k ille d 0 -8 L a b o re rs and 34 85-0 6 1 5 .0 4o 100.0 S e m i-S k ille d 9 o r More S k i l l e d and 32 5 5 .2 26 4 4 .8 58 ■ 100.0 W hite C o lla r 0-8 S k i l l e d and 12 6 6 .7 6 3 3 .3 18 100 .0 White C o lla r 9 o r More 14 4 8 .3 15 5 1 .7 29 100.0 T o ta l 92 6 3 .4 53 3 6 .6 145 100.0 c h i sq u a re = 12.65 P = < .01 c = .283 239 sq u a re i s s t i l l s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l , b u t i t i s s m a lle r (1 2 .6 5 ) showing t h a t e d u c a tio n i s a s t r o n g e r i n d i c a t o r by i t s e l f th a n when u se d t o g e t h e r w ith f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a ti o n . The w r i t e r h y p o th e s iz e d t h a t th e g r e a t e r th e num b e r o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g , th e g r e a t e r p r o p o r t i o n t h e r e would be o f upw ardly m obile p e rs o n s and t h a t th e few er th e number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g th e g r e a t e r p r o p o r t io n o f downwardly m obile p e rs o n s t h e r e would be i n t h a t c a t e g o ry . Median y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g o f nonm obile p e rs o n s were- h y p o th e s iz e d to be l e s s th a n t h a t o f upw ardly m obile p e rs o n s and more th a n t h a t o f th e downwardly m o b ile . Table 68 shows t h a t th e h i g h e s t m edian number o f y e a r s (1 0 .7 ) i s f o r th e upw ardly m obile re s p o n d e n ts . The median number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g i s th e same ( 8 .5 ) f o r b o th th e nonm obile and th e downwardly m obile re s p o n d e n ts . Thus, w h ile e d u c a tio n i s h e l p f u l i n upward m o b i l i t y , i t i s n e i t h e r a p r e r e q u i s i t e f o r n o r a g u a ra n te e o f such m o b i l i t y . T able 69 i n d i c a t e s no a s s o c i a t i o n betw een f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a tio n and r e s p o n d e n t 's o c c u p a tio n , th e p r o b a b i l i t y o f g e t t i n g a c h i s q u a re as h ig h as t h a t o f th e t a b l e b e in g 240 TABLE 6 8 SCHOOLING AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS Y e a r s o f S c h o o l i n g Type Of M o b i l i t y T o t a l Upward None Downward Num b e r P e r <~ent Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t 0 -8 15 25-9 23 39-7 20 34.5 58 1 0 0 .1 9-11 20 4 2 .6 13 2 7 .7 14 2 9 .8 47 1 0 0 .1 12 o r More 24 6 0 .0 10 2 5.0 6 15-0 40 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1 .7 40 27-6 145 1 0 0 .0 M ed ian 1 0 .7 8. 5 8 .5 9 -4 c h i s q u a r e =: 1 2 .1 3 p = . 02 C = . 278 t TABLE 69 FATHERS' OCCUPATION AND RESPONDENTS' OCCUPATION F a t h e r s ’ O c c u p a tio n R e s p o n d e n t s 1 O c c u p a tio n T o t a l R e l i e f and L a b o r e r s S em i- S k i l l e d S k i l l e d W hite C o l l a r Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t L a b o r e r s 31 3 7 .3 23 27-7 19 22 .9 10 1 2 .0 83 99-9 S e m i - S k i l l e d 9 6 0 .0 3 20.0 2 13-3 1 6 .7 15 10 0.0 S k i l l e d 12 4 0 .0 7 23-3 7 23.3 4 13-3 30 99-9 W hite C o l l a r 4 23.3 3 17-6 5 29.4 5 29-4 17 99-9 T o t a l 56 38.6 36 2 4 .8 33 22.8 20 13.8 145 100.0 .49 . On t h e o t h e r hand, i f we t a b u l a t e th e d a t a s e p a r a t e l y f o r e a c h group o f r e s p o n d e n ts (housew ives and p e rs o n s o t h e r th a n h o u se w iv e s ), and f o r eac h c a te g o ry o f f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a tio n , the modal c a t e g o r y f o r th e second ( r e s p o n d e n t) g e n e r a t i o n i s a lo w e r r a n k in g one, w ith t h r e e e x c e p t i o n s : h ousew ives whose f a t h e r s were l a b o r e r s were more l i k e l y to be m a rr ie d to l a b o r e r s th a n to p e r s o n s o f any o t h e r o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y ; and employed r e s p o n d e n ts whose f a t h e r s w ere s e m i - s k i l l e d w o rk ers w ere more l i k e l y them s e l v e s t o be s e m i - s k i l l e d th a n to be i n any o t h e r c a te g o r y w h ile t h o s e whose f a t h e r s were l a b o r e r s were m ost l i k e l y t o be s e m i - s k i l l e d . Thus t h e r e h as been a s t r o n g te n d e n c y tow ard e i t h e r downward m o b i l i t y o r n o n - m o b il i ty , a lth o u g h th e c h i s q u a re f o r n e i t h e r c a te g o r y o f re s p o n d e n t i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . Of a l l r e s p o n d e n t s , 4 0 .7 p e r c e n t have been up w a rd ly m o b ile , 31*7 p e r c e n t nonm obile and 27*6 p e r c e n t downwardly m o b ile . Thus, a lth o u g h th e w r i t e r had h y p o t h e s iz e d t h a t a p e r s o n 's o c c u p a tio n (o r t h e o c c u p a tio n o f o n e 's husband ) would be more l i k e l y to f a l l i n th e c a te g o r y o f th e f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a tio n t h a n in any o t h e r c a te g o r y , w ith d im in is h in g p r o b a b i l i t y th e f a r t h e r a c a t e g o r y i s from t h a t o f t h e f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a t i o n , t h i s h y p o t h e s i s fo u n d no s u p p o r t i n t h e d a t a . Somewhat u n e x p e c te d a l s o was th e s i z e a b l e number o f r e s p o n d e n t s who had b e en downw ardly m o b ile . The c a s e s o f downward m o b i l i t y m o s tly seem t o in v o lv e a d ro p i n th e s k i l l h i e r a r c h y from th e im m ig ran t to th e se co n d g e n e r a t i o n . Y et i t s h o u ld be r e a l i z e d t h a t downward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y i s n o t a lw ay s i n v o l v e d . Thus i t f r e q u e n t l y h a ppened t h a t th e f a t h e r h ad been a s k i l l e d m anual l a b o r e r o r sm a ll m e rc h a n t i n M exico; su ch f a t h e r s w ould be c l a s s i f i e d g e n e r a l l y as lo w e r c l a s s i n Mexico and would p e r h a p s a l s o have t h e v a lu e o r i e n t a t i o n s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t h a t c l a s s . F u r th e r m o r e , i t i s a l s o l i k e l y t h a t t h e i r e d u c a t i o n a l b a c k g ro u n d was e x tr e m e l y l i m i t e d , w i t h a h ig h r a t e o f i l l i t e r a c y among t h i s g ro u p , and few s p e a k e r s o f f l u e n t E n g l i s h . The son o r d a u g h te r , on t h e o t h e r hand, by a c h i e v i n g a b e t t e r e d u c a t i o n a l p o s i t i o n and s p e a k in g E n g l i s h a l t h o u g h f o l lo w in g o n ly a s e m i s k i l l e d o c c u p a ti o n may a c t u a l l y have a c h ie v e d a s t a t u s somewhere i n th e lo w e r r e a c h e s o f th e m id d le c l a s s . T h e r e f o r e th e d a t a on downward o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b il i t y s h o u ld be c a u t i o u s l y i n t e r p r e t e d . T a b le 70 shows t h a t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s whose 244 TABLE 70 FATHERS* OCCUPATION AND RESPONDENTS' MOBILITY T ype o f M o b i l i t y Upward None Downward T o t a l F a t h e r s 1 Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r O c c u p a tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t L a b o r e r 52 62.7 31 37-3 — 83 1 0 0 .0 S e m i - S k i l l e d 3 20.0 3 2 0 .0 9 6 0 .0 15 1 0 0 .0 S k i l l e d 4 13-3 7 2 3 .3 19 6 3 .3 30 9 9.9 W h ite C o l l a r — — 5 2 9 .4 12 7 0 .6 17 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 59 4 0.7 46 31-7 40 2 7.6 145 1 0 0 .0 chi square =55-^0 p = < .01 f a t h e r s were s e m i s k i l l e d , 6 0 . 0 p e r c e n t w ere downw ardly m o b ile ; o f th o s e whose f a t h e r s w ere s k i l l e d w o r k e r s , 63*3 p e r c e n t w ere downw ardly m o b ile ; and o f th o s e whose f a t h e r s w ere w h i t e - c o l l a r w o r k e r s , 7 0 .6 p e r c e n t were downw ardly m o b ile . T hus, t h e h i g h e r r a n k in g t h e o c c u p a t i o n o f t h e f a t h e r , t h e h i g h e r was t h e l i k e l i h o o d o f th e r e s p o n d e n t s b e in g downwardly m o b ile . C o n v e r s e ly , o f th o s e r e s p o n d e n t s whose f a t h e r s w ere l a b o r e r s , 6 2 .6 p e r c e n t have been u p w a rd ly m o b ile . Chi s q u a r e f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .01 l e v e l . On th e o t h e r hand m ost o f t h e s e m i - s k i l l e d , s k i l l e d , and w h ite c o l l a r r e s p o n d e n t s have been u p w a rd ly m o b ile (se e T a b le 71)* F or t h e em ployed r e s p o n d e n t s (se e T a b le 7 2 ) , t h e r e s p e c t i v e p e r c e n t a g e s a r e 53*8, 5 2 .4 , 7 1 -4 f o r t h e h o u se w iv e s (s e e T a b le 7 3 ), t h e r e s p e c t i v e p e r c e n t a g e s a r e even h i g h e r , i . e . , 8 1 . 8 , 7 6 . 9, and 83*3- Working r e s p o n d e n t s who were l a b o r e r s , w ere m o s tly downw ardly m o b ile (5 6 .7 p e r c e n t ) w h ile h o u se w iv e s whose h u sb a n d s w ere l a b o r e r s w ere m o s tly n o n m o b ile (69*2 p e r c e n t ) . Thus i t w ould a p p e a r t h a t m a r r i a g e m ig h t be one o f t h e e a s i e r m ethods o f upw ard s o c i a l m o b i l i t y . The s l i g h t te n d e n c y to w a rd upward m o b i l i t y i n th e g e n e r a t i o n o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t 246 TABLE 71 OCCUPATION AND MOBILITY OP ALL RESPONDENTS Type o f M obility- Upward None Downward T o ta l Num- P e r Num- P er Num- Per Num- Per O c cu p a tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t R e l i e f and L a b o re rs — - - 31 5 5 .4 25 4 4 .6 56 100.0 Semi- S k i l l e d 23 63 -9 3 8 .3 10 27.8 36 100.0 S k i l l e d 21 63.6 7 21.2 5 15.2 33 100 . 0 White C o l l a r 15 7 5 -0 5 25.0 - - - - 20 100.0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1 .7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 c h i sq u a re = 40 .0 1 p = < . 01 c = .465 247 TABLE 72 OCCUPATION AND MOBILITY OP EMPLOYED RESPONDENTS ____________ Type o f M o b ility __________ Upward None Downward T o t a l Num- P e r Num- P er Num- P e r Num- Per O ccu p a tio n b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t L a b o re rs - - - - 13 4 3 .3 17 5 6 .7 30 1 0 0 .0 Semi- S k i l l e d 14 56.0 3 1 2 .0 8 3 2 .0 25 1 0 0 .0 S k i l l e d 11 55*0 4 2 0 .0 5 2 5 .0 20 1 0 0 .0 White C o l la r 10 7 1 .4 4 28 .6 - - 14 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 35 39*3 24. 27 .0 30 3 3 -7 89 1 0 0 .0 248 TABLE 73 OCCUPATION. OF HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD AND MOBILITY OF HOUSEWIVES Type o f M o b i l i t y U pw ard None Downward T o t a l O c c u p a t i o n Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t R e l i e f a n d L a b o r e r s 18 6 9 .2 8 3 0.8 26 1 0 0 .0 S e m i- S k i l l e d 9 8 1 .8 — _ 2 1 8 .2 11 1 0 0 .0 S k i l l e d 10 7 6 .9 3 23 .1 — 13 1 0 0 .0 W h ite C o l l a r 5 8 3 -3 1 1 6 .7 — - - 6 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 24 4 2 . 9 22 39-3 10 1 7 -9 56 1 0 0 .1 249 a p p e a rs t o be th e c a s e l a r g e l y because m ore t h a n h a l f o f th e p a r e n t a l g e n e r a t i o n (5 6 -5 p e r c e n t ) were l a b o r e r s . The m ost p e r t i n e n t f a c t o r s a re l i k e l y e d u c a t i o n and th e c h an g e i n th e c o m p o s itio n o f Pom ona's l a b o r f o r c e in t h e p a s t tw e n ty t o f o r t y y e a r s , e s p e c i a l l y th e v i r t u a l d i s a p p e a r ance o f o p p o r t u n i t i e s in u n s k i l l e d a g r i c u l t u r a l work. T a b le 74 r e l a t e s o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y to e t h n i c s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . I t i s e a s i l y s e e n t h a t a somewhat h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e o f p e rs o n s c a l l i n g t h e m s e lv e s "S p a n ish " have b e e n u p w ardly m ob ile (5 2 . 2 p e r c e n t ) th an o f the r e s p o n d e n t s c a l l i n g th e m s e lv e s "M exican" (on ly 39*0 p e r c e n t ) . The g r e a t e s t p e r c e n t a g e ”‘6f th e u p w a rd ly m obile p e r s o n s , how ever, c o n tin u e d t o c a l l t h e m s e lv e s "M exican" (7 8 .0 p e r c e n t ) , an d o n ly 2 0 .3 p e r c e n t c a l l e d th e m s e lv e s " S p a n is h ." Of p e r s o n s c a l l i n g th e m s e lv e s " S p a n is h ," t h e r e were t w i c e as many u p w ard ly m o b ile as t h e r e w ere downw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s , w h ile i n t h e case o f th o se s e l f - i d e n t i f y i n g as "M exican" t h e r a t i o was o n l y 1 .4 to 1. T ab le 7 4 does n o t r e a c h th e .0 5 l e v e l o f s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . P e rh a p s th e u p w a rd ly m o b il e do c a s t o f f t h e i r M exican e t h n i c i d e n t i t y , b u t c e r t a i n l y n o t i n th e . g r e a t num bers s u g g e s t e d by t h e l i t e r a t u r e . 250 TABLE 74 MOBILITY AND ETHNIC SELF-IDENTIFICATION T y p e o f M o b i l i t y E t h n i c S e l f - I d e n t i f i c a t i o n T o t a l M e x ic a n S p a n i s h I n d i a n a n d O t h e r Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num- P e r b e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Upw ard 46 7 8 .0 12 2 0 .3 1 1 .7 59 1 0 0 .0 None 39 8 4 .8 5 1 0 .9 2 4 .3 46 1 0 0 .0 Downward 33 82.5 6 1 5 .0 1 2.5 40 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 118 8 1 .4 23 1 5 -9 4 2 .8 145 1 0 0 .1 251 M o b i l i t y an d C l a s s P e r c e p t i o n s o f R e s p o n d e n t s M ost o f t h e h i g h - s t a t u s p o s i t i o n s o c c u p i e d by M e x ic a n - A m e r ic a n s i n t h e o p e n - c l a s s s y s te m o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a p p e a r t o b e a c h i e v e d r a t h e r t h a n a s c r i b e d . T h i s i s a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n w h ic h h a s b e e n v e r i f i e d f o r P o m o n a 's M e x ic a n - A m e r ic a n s . The r e s e a r c h e r i n i t i a l l y a ssu m e d t h a t i f a M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n e n j o y s m i d d l e - c l a s s s t a t u s , i t i s m ore l i k e l y t h a n n o t b e c a u s e h e h a s b e e n u p w a r d ly o c c u p a t i o n a l l y a n d s o c i a l l y m o b i l e . As p a r t o f t h e t e s t i n g o f t h i s a s s u m p t i o n , t h e w r i t e r h y p o t h e s i z e d t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e h i g h e r t h e s e l f - p e r c e i v e d s o c i a l c l a s s , t h e m ore u p w a rd o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y t h e r e w o u ld b e , an d t h e l o w e r t h e c l a s s , t h e m ore downward m o b i l i t y . A c c o r d in g t o T a b l e 75 a s l i g h t l y h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e o f u p w a r d ly m o b i l e p e r s o n s p l a c e d t h e m s e l v e s i n t h e c o m b in e d u p p e r an d m id d le c l a s s e s t h a n among t h e d o w n w ard ly m o b i l e a n d a s l i g h t l y l o w e r p e r c e n t a g e i n t h e c o m b in e d w o r k in g an d l o w e r c l a s s e s t h a n among t h e d o w n w ard ly m o b i l e . The o n l y p e r s o n s t o i d e n t i f y t h e m s e l v e s a s u p p e r c l a s s h a d b e e n u p w a r d ly m o b ile . The c h i s q u a r e f o r t h i s t a b l e d o e s n o t r e a c h t h e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . The w r i t e r w i s h e d t o know w h e t h e r t h e f a c t t h a t a TABLE 75 MOBILITY AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT Type o f M o b i l i t y ■ ; 1 1 ■ —■ » * C l a s s S e l f - P la c e m e n t T o t a l U pper M id d le W orking Lower Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Upward 3 6 .7 27 60.0 10 22.2 5 11.1 45 100.0 None - - - - 13 52.0 6 2 4 .0 6 2 4 .0 25 100.0 Downward _ — — — 18 60.0 7 2 3.3 5 I 6.7 30 100.0 T o t a l 3 3 .0 58 58.0 23 23.0 16 16.0 100 100.0 252 253 r e s p o n d e n t h a d been u p w a rd ly m o b ile had any e f f e c t on how he p e r c e i v e d th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e and s t a t u s r e l a t i o n s h i p s among th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n . The d a t a c o n c e r n in g t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e tw ee n a r e s p o n d e n t ’ s s o c i a l m o b i l i t y and t h e most i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e s n o t e d by t h a t r e s p o n d e n t among th e M exican A m ericans o f Pomona show no d e f i n i t e te n d e n c y . A lth o u g h th e r e s e a r c h e r h y p o t h e s iz e d t h a t th e more m o b ile i n d i v i d u a l s w ould p e r c e i v e a l a r g e r number o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s , T a b le 76 shows q u i t e d i f f e r e n t r e s u l t s . Downward l y m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v e d t h e l a r g e s t mean number o f c l a s s e s , 2 . 29 , t h e u p w ard ly m o b ile th e n e x t l a r g e s t , 2 . 2 0 , and t h e n on m obile r e s p o n d e n t s p e r c e i v i n g th e s m a l l e s t mean number o f c l a s s e s ( 2 .0 0 ) . The n onm obile r e s p o n d e n t s h a d th e l a r g e s t p e r c e n t a g e o f no an sw e rs to th e q u e s t i o n , w h i l e th e l o w e s t p e r c e n t a g e o f r e s p o n d e n t s n o t f u r n i s h i n g d a t a was t h a t o f th e downw ardly m o b ile . Chi s q u a r e f o r T a b le 76 d o e s n o t r e a c h th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e , h o w ever. TABLE 76 MOBILITY AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED a c s w a s e a i n j »i ■ - t . ? i ■ r ’fia a s c ^ g e . i : ., i . s 1 t ; " Tsa a a g s ^ a ^ a a c a a s L . i ^ - a . . : . . i . a . .a h j b a — J - a Number o f C la s se s P e rc e iv e d Type of M o b ility One Two Three o r Four T o ta l Mean Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per cen t Upward 8 1 7 .8 21 46 .7 16 35.6 45 100.1 2 .2 0 None 8 26.7 15 5 0 .0 7 2 3 .3 30 100.0 2 .0 0 Downward 8 25-8 8 25.8 15- 4 8 .4 31 100 .0 2.2 9 T o ta l 24 22.6 44 41.5 38 3 5 .8 106 99-9 v i \ ■ ro vjt 255 M o b i l i t y a n d C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e s p o n d e n t s In t h i s s e c t i o n a r e d i s c u s s e d t h e p o s s i b l e r e l a t i o n s h i p s b e t w e e n o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y o r n o n m o b i l i t y a n d c e r t a i n r e l e v a n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f s a m p le m e m b e rs. C on s i d e r a b l e a t t e n t i o n h a s b e e n g i v e n t o r e s i d e n t i a l s t a b i l i t y a n d m o b i l i t y , and i n w h ic h p a r t s o f t h e c i t y a r e t o b e f o u n d t h e m o re m o b i l e i n d i v i d u a l s . In P om ona a t l e a s t o n e - t h i r d o f t h e M e x ic a n p o p u l a t i o n l i v e s o u t s i d e t h e c o n f i n e s o f w h a t i s g e n e r a l l y c o n s i d e r e d t o b e t h e M e x ic a n a r e a . They a r e o u t s i d e e i t h e r b e c a u s e t h e y h a v e m oved o u t from t h e c o r e d i s t r i c t , o r e l s e h a v e m o v e d d i r e c t l y from c o m m u n i t i e s o t h e r t h a n P o m o n a. E ach r e s p o n d e n t I n t h e w r i t e r ' s s a m p l e was a s k e d f o r h i s p r e v i o u s a d d r e s s a n d t h e l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e I n h i s p r e s e n t a n d p r e v i o u s r e s i d e n c e s , I n a n a t t e m p t t o d e t e r m i n e how o f t e n p e o p l e moved a b o u t . T h e w r i t e r c a l c u l a t e d t h e m ean l e n g t h o f tim e s p e n t a t t h e r e s p o n d e n t ' s l a t e s t two r e s i d e n c e s ; i n c a s e t h e r e s p o n d e n t h a d m oved s i n c e t h e c i t y d i r e c t o r y was c o m p i l e d , t h e m ean r e f e r s t o t h e l a s t t h r e e r e s i d e n c e s . O f t h e w r i t e r ' s s a m p l e , 56 r e s p o n d e n t s , o r 3 8 .1 p e r c e n t h a d s p e n t a m ean o f 1-5 256 y e a r s i n t h e i r l a s t two r e s i d e n c e s , 51 r e s p o n d e n ts , o r 3 4 .7 p e r c e n t had s p e n t 6-10 y e a r s , and 40 r e s p o n d e n t s , o r 27.2 p e r c e n t had s p e n t from 11 to 36 y e a r s . Of th e t o t a l sample o f 147, some 47 p e rs o n s had moved to t h e i r p r e s e n t a d d re s s from o u t s i d e th e c i t y o f Pomona. A lso, 3 p e rs o n s had l i v e d t h e i r e n t i r e l i f e t i m e s i n t h e i r p r e s e n t r e s i d e n c e . Thus 97 p e rs o n s had moved from one Pomona a d d r e s s to a n o t h e r . The r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s from and to w hich t h e s e p e r s o n s moved a re shown i n T able 77* Each o f t h e a r e a s r e c e i v e d p e r s o n s from a v a r i e t y o f o t h e r a r e a s , and from o u t s i d e Pomona as w e ll; th e s e o u t - o f - town m ig r a n ts c o n s t i t u t e from o n e - f o u r t h to o n e - h a l f o f th e p o p u l a t i o n o f each o f th e a r e a s . In th e w e s te r n p o r t i o n o f C, 44 p e r c e n t o f th e sam ple had moved from a n o th e r a d d r e s s i n th e same a r e a ; i n th e n o r t h e r n p o r t i o n o f E, 56 p e r c e n t had moved from a n o t h e r a d d r e s s i n th e same d i s t r i c t . No o t h e r a r e a even a p p ro a c h e d th e s e p e r c e n t a g e s . Of th e 97 moves w i t h in Pomona more th a n h a l f (51) w ere to a r e s i d e n c e i n a n e ig h b o rh o o d o f th e same ra n k , w h ile a b o u t two and a h a l f tim e s a s many p e o p le moved i n t o a h i g h e r r a n k in g a r e a a s moved i n t o a low er ra n k in g a r e a ( r a t i o o f 33 to 13)* Thus th e p re d o m in a n t te n d e n c y i s to TABLE 77 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND PREVIOUS RESIDENTIAL AREA Area o f P re s e n t R e s i dence Area o f ] Previous R esidence Another C ity No Other R e s i dence T o ta l A B c D E Num b e r • Per c e n t Num b e r ■ Per c e n t Num b e r ■ Per c e n t Num b e r ■ Per cen t Num b e r - Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r - Per c e n t A 1 7-1 3 21.4 2 1 4 .3 __ - _ 3 21 .4 5 35.7 _ — 14 9 9 .9 B 1 4 .3 3 13-0 4 1 7 .4 1 4 .3 4 1 7 .4 10 43.5 - - — 23 9 9 .9 C - - — 1 1.8 23 4 1 .8 2 3-6 13 23.6 14 25-5 2 3-6 55 9 9 .9 D 1 10.0 3 30.0 1 10.0 5 50.0 _ _ — 10 100.0 E 9 20.0 1 2.2 21 46 .7 13 28.9 1 2.2 45 100.0 T o ta l 2 1 .4 7 4 .8 39 26.5 7 4 .8 42 28.6 47 32.0 3 2 .0 147 100.1 257 ) I 258 s t a y a t th e same r e s i d e n t i a l l e v e l , b u t I f a fa m ily moves to a new l e v e l , i t i s much more l i k e l y to move up th a n down. I t sh o u ld be remembered a ls o t h a t most p a r t s o f Areas A and B a re new, i . e . , c o n s t r u c t e d s in c e World War I I , w ith a g o o d ly p o r t i o n b u i l t w ith in th e p a s t f i v e o r t e n y e a r s . Of s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t i s a p o s s i b l e a s s o c i a t i o n between r e s i d e n t i a l and o c c u p a ti o n a l m o b i l i t y , i . e . , w h e th er th e p e rs o n s who a re moving up th e s k i l l s h i e r a r c h y a re a ls o th e ones who have been moving to b e t t e r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s , and downwardly m obile p e rs o n s th e r e v e r s e . T able 78 g i v e s , however, no e v id e n c e f o r t h i s type o f a s s o c i a t i o n i n Pomona. The p e r c e n ta g e s o f upward, down w ard, and no m o b i l i t y o f e i t h e r ty p e a re q u i t e e v e n ly d i s t r i b u t e d among t h e same t h r e e c a t e g o r i e s o f th e o t h e r type o f m o b il i ty . There i s a te n d e n c y , however, f o r th e i n m ig ra n ts from o t h e r com m unities to be o c c u p a ti o n a l l y upw ardly m obile r a t h e r th a n e i t h e r downwardly m obile o r nonm obile. There i s fu rth e rm o re no a p p a re n t a s s o c i a t i o n betw een l e v e l o f an a re a and m o b i l i t y o f i t s r e s i d e n t s (se e T able 79)* The w r i t e r was a ls o i n t e r e s t e d in a p o s s i b l e r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een r e s i d e n t i a l s t a b i l i t y and o c c u p a tio n a l 259 TABLE 78 RESIDENTIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY Type: O f < s s s s a a s a s c s s s a s s a e e s s e s s s s a s K a a x s & a c s a e M a s s s s D ccupational M o b ility Type of Upward None Downward T o ta l R e s i d e n t i a l M o b ility Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per cent Num b e r P e r c e n t Num ber P er c e n t Upward 13 39.4 11 33-3 9 2 7 -3 33 100.0 None 17 3 3 .3 18 35-3 16 3 1 .4 51 100.0 Downward 5 From A nother 38.5 3 23.1 5 3 8 .5 13 100.1 C ity No R e sid e n 22 4 8 .9 14 31.1 9 2 0 .0 45 100.0 t i a l Move 2 6 6 .7 _ — — — ' 1 33*3 3 100.0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 31*7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 260 TABLE 79 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND MOBILITY OP RESPONDENTS ___________ Type o f M o b ility ___________ Upward None Downward T o ta l Num- P er Num- Per Num- P e r Num- P e r Area b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t A 7 50.0 3 21.4 4 28.6 14 1 0 0 .0 B 12 5 2.2 3 1 3.0 8 3 4 .8 23 1 0 0 .0 G 19 34.5 23 4 1 .8 13 23.6 55 9 9 -9 D 6 66.6 2 22.2 1 11.1 9 9 9 - 9 E 15 34 .1 15 34.1 14 3 1 .8 44 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 59 4 0 .7 46 31-7 40 2 7 .6 145 1 0 0 .0 m o b i l i t y , i . e . , w h e th e r th e p e o p le who move f r e q u e n t l y a re more l i k e l y to be u pw ard ly o r downwardly m o b ile . T ab le 80 shows t h a t f o r p e r s o n s who have sp e n t a mean o f 1-5 y e a r s i n t h e i r l a s t two r e s i d e n c e s , t h e r e i s a s much upward as downward m o b i l i t y . For p e r s o n s sp e n d in g a mean o f 6 o r more y e a r s th e te n d e n c y i s d e f i n i t e l y upward; t h e r e i s l i k e w i s e a lo w e r p e r c e n ta g e o f downwardly m o b ile th a n o f nonm obile p e r s o n s . Upwardly m ob ile re s p o n d e n ts s p e n t a m edian 7*1 y e a r s i n t h e i r l a s t two p l a c e s o f r e s i d e n c e , t h e nonm obile re s p o n d e n ts 6 . 2 y e a r s and th e downwardly m o b ile 6 . 0 y e a r s . The c h i sq u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e does n o t r e a c h th e .05 l e v e l o f s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . I t i s d i f f i c u l t to say w h e th e r o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y I s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h r e s i d e n t i a l m o b i l i t y In t h i s M exican-A m erican community. Home o w n ersh ip i s g e n e r a l l y c o n s id e r e d to be i n d i c a t i v e and sym b olic o f s t a b i l i t y and r e s p e c t a b i l i t y . In I t s e l f i t i s a symbol o f some s o r t o f a c h ie v e d s t a t u s . On th e o t h e r hand, among th o s e w o rk ers c o n s t a n t l y m i g r a t i n g , who m ust t r a v e l i n s e a r c h o f employm ent, o r whose em ploy ment I s n o t s t e a d y i n ty p e , th e a ch iev e m e n t o f home ow ner s h ip i s made d i f f i c u l t . On th e h i g h e r ru n g s o f th e s o c i a l 262 TABLE 80 RESIDENTIAL STABILITY AND OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY Mean Y ears a t L a t e s t Two Type o f M o b i l i t y None Downward Upward _ Num- P er Num- P e r Num- P er T o t a l Num- P er R e s id e n c e s b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t 1-5 19 3 4.5 17 3 0 .9 19 34-5 55 9 9 .9 6-10 23 45-1 16 3 1 .4 12 2 3 .5 51 1 0 0 . 0 11-36 17 4 3 .6 13 3 3 .3 9 2 3 .1 39 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 59 4 0 .7 46 31-7 4o 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 Median 7 -1 6 . 2 6 . 0 6 .5 263 l a d d e r , how ever, a l a r g e amount o f h o r i z o n t a l m o b i l i t y would n o t a p p e a r to be i n c o n s i s t e n t w ith home o w n e rsh ip , b u t few M exicans a re on t h e s e h i g h e r r u n g s . In f a c t , s t a b i l i t y and perm anency o f employment and r e s i d e n c e have o r d i n a r i l y been p o s t u l a t e d as co n d u civ e to jo b s e c u r i t y , o c c u p a t i o n a l advancem ent, and v ic e v e r s a . B ecause o f t h e s e i n t e r r e l a t e d f a c t o r s , th e w r i t e r h as h y p o th e s iz e d a g r e a t e r p r o p o r t i o n o f homeowners among th e o c c u p a t i o n a l l y m o b ile , a l e s s e r p r o p o r t i o n among th e o c c u p a t i o n a l l y non- m o b ile and th e s m a l l e s t p r o p o r t i o n among th e downwardly o c c u p a t i o n a l l y m o b ile . T able 81 in d e e d does show t h a t among th e u pw ard ly m o b ile th e homeowners outnum ber th e r e n t e r s more th a n k to 1, w h ile among th e n o n m o b ile .and downwardly m o bile th e homeowners outnum ber th e r e n t e r s s l i g h t l y o v e r 2 to 1. T here i s c o n v e r s e l y a s t r o n g te n d e n c y f o r homeowners to be u pw ardly m o b ile , w h ile f o r th e r e n t e r s th e te n d e n c y i s more to w ard n o n m o b ility o r downward m o b i l i t y . Chi sq u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e does n o t r e a c h th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . C o n tra r y to th e s ta te m e n t made above c o n c e rn in g employment s t a b i l i t y , T ab le 82 a p p e a rs to show an i n v e r s e r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een t h i s f a c t o r and upward o c c u p a t i o n a l 264 TABLE 81 HOME OWNERSHIP AND MOBILITY OP RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b i l i t y Home Upward None Downward T o ta l Owner Num P e r Num Per Num P er Num P e r s h i p b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Own 48 4 5 -3 31 2 9 .3 27 25-5 106 1 0 0 .1 R en t 11 2 8 .2 15 38.5 13 3 3 .3 39 1 0 0 . 0 T o ta l 59 4 0 . 7 46 31-7 40 2 7 -6 145 1 0 0 .0 265 TABLE 82 NUMBER OF YEARS IN PRESENT EMPLOYMENT AND MOBILITY Number o f Years i n P r e s e n t Type o f M o b i l it y Upward None Downward T o ta l Employ ment Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Not w ork in g * 2 9-5 11 5 2 .4 8 3 8 .1 21 1 0 0 .0 0-1 15 4 8 .4 8 25-8 8 2 5 .8 31 1 0 0 .0 2-5 19 5 5 -9 8 23-5 7 2 0 .6 34 1 0 0 .0 6 -1 0 8 4 2 .1 3 1 5 .8 8 4 2 .1 19 1 0 0 .0 11 o r more 14 4 3 .8 11 3 4 .4 7 2 1 .9 32 1 0 0 .1 T o t a l 58 4 2 .3 41 2 9 .9 38 2 7 .7 137 9 9 .9 Median o f Those W orking 4 . 3 5 .2 5 .5 * I n c lu d e s unem ployed, r e t i r e d , and p e r s o n s on r e l i e f . 266 m o b i l i t y . The h i g h e s t m edian number o f y e a r s i n p r e s e n t employment was f o r th e downw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s ( 5 -5 ) and th e l o w e s t f o r t h e u p w a rd ly m o b ile ( 4 .3 ) - F o r 0-5 y e a r s on t h e jo b t h e te n d e n c y i s f o r upw ard m o b i l i t y , w h ile f o r 6 o r m ore y e a r s t h e te n d e n c y i s f o r downward m o b i l i t y . Chi s q u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e d oes n o t r e a c h th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . I f i t be assum ed t h a t h ig h s t a t u s i s a s s o c i a t e d w ith b o th h i g h incom e and w ith upward m o b i l i t y , th e n i t would f o l l o w t h a t h i g h income s h o u ld be a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward m o b i l i t y . F u rth e r m o re , i t I s assum ed t h a t c e r t a i n income l e v e l s a re n e c e s s a r y to p u r c h a s e th e s t a t u s symbols a p p r o p r i a t e t o g iv e n l e v e l s i n th e s o c i a l h i e r a r c h y and t h a t r e s p o n d e n t s a r e aw are o f t h e s e sy m bo ls. The w r i t e r t h e r e f o r e h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t th e h i g h e r t h e t o t a l f a m i ly Income t h e g r e a t e r w ould be t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f u p w a rd ly m o bile p e r s o n s . The l a t t e r would have a h i g h e r a v e ra g e Income t h a n dow nw ardly m o b ile p e r s o n s . The d a t a f o r t e s t in g t h e s e h y p o t h e s e s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le 84 w hich shows t h a t u p w a rd ly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s have t h e h i g h e s t m edian f a m ily incom e ( $ 6 , 6 l 5 ) j a lt h o u g h dow nw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s have a h i g h e r m edian incom e ($ 5 ,2 5 0 ) t h a n do 267 TABLE 83 INCOME AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS T o ta l Type o f M o b i l it y Annual Upward None Downward T o t a l F am ily Num - P e r Num P er Num P er Num P er Income b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Under $ 4 ,0 0 0 14 1 2 .5 16 5 0 .0 12 3 7 .5 32 1 0 0 .0 4 ,0 0 0 - 5 ,9 9 9 15 3 4 .9 17 39-5 11 25.6 43 1 0 0 .0 6 ,0 0 0 - 7 ,9 9 9 19 5 2 .8 6 1 6 .7 11 30.6 36 1 0 0 .1 8 ,0 0 0 o r Over 16 6 6 .7 5 2 0 .8 3 1 2 .5 24 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 54 4 0 .0 44 3 2 .6 37 2 7 .4 135 1 0 0 .0 Median $ 6 ,6 1 5 $ 4 ,6 0 0 $ 5 ,2 5 0 c h i s q u a re = 2 2 .7 6 P = < • 01 C = . 380 * 268 t h e n o nm ob ile r e s p o n d e n t s ( $ 4 ,6 0 0 ) . W ith one e x c e p ti o n i n e a c h c a s e th e h i g h e r th e income c a t e g o r y , t h e h i g h e r i s th e p e r c e n t a g e o f u p w a rd ly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s , and th e lo w e r th e p e r c e n t a g e o f downw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s and th e lo w e r th e p e r c e n t a g e o f n o n m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s . Chi s q u a r e f o r T a b le 83 i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .01 l e v e l . The r e s e a r c h e r h a d o r i g i n a l l y h y p o t h e s iz e d t h a t th e h i g h e r th e s o c i a l c l a s s , th e g r e a t e r would be th e p r o p o r t i o n o f h o u s e h o ld s i n w hich one sp o u se would be o f Anglo o r i g i n , and a l s o t h a t t h e r e w ould be a h i g h e r p r o p o r t i o n o f such s p o u s e s i n t h e u p w a rd ly m o b ile h o u s e h o ld s th a n i n th e downw ardly o r n o n -m o b ile o n e s . S in c e o n ly s i x Anglo w iv e s and one Anglo h u sb a n d w ere foun d i n a l l h o u s e s c o n t a c t e d , t h i s num ber i s to o s m a ll f o r t h e t e s t i n g o f any h y p o t h e s e s . B ecause o f th e l i m i t e d e d u c a t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s a v a i l a b l e to many M exicans and M exican-A m erican s u n d e r c o n d i t i o n s p r e v a i l i n g t h r e e o r f o u r d e c a d e s ago, few g o t a h e a d , a l t h o u g h o p p o r t u n i t y f o r m o b i l i t y h a s been much 269 b e t t e r f o r t h e l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s . 2^ Many M exican immi g r a n t s e x p e r i e n c e d downward o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y w i t h i n t h e i r own l i f e t i m e , and t h e i r c h i l d r e n i n th e t r a n s i t i o n from t h e p a r e n t a l g e n e r a t i o n . The im m ig ra n t, i f a s k i l l e d w o rk e r, m anager, o r w h i t e - c o l l a r w o rk e r, o r th e o f f s p r i n g o f o ne, h a s o f t e n h a d t o ta k e u n s k i l l e d o r s e m i s k i l l e d work b e c a u s e o f job d i s c r i m i n a t i o n , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n th e p re -W o rld War I I p e r i o d . Only 1 6 .1 p e r c e n t o f t h e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n have been u p w a rd ly m o b ile (s e e T able 8 4 ) . On th e o t h e r han d , i n Pomona h a l f o f th e se c o n d g e n e r a t i o n have been u p w a rd ly m o b ile . L a t e r ' g e n e r a t i o n s have n o t done a s w e l l , w i t h e q u a l num bers b e in g u p w a rd ly and down w a r d ly m o b ile . The p e r c e n t a g e o f l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n p e rs o n s who have b een no n m o b ile i s n e a r l y th e same a s f o r t h e se co n d g e n e r a t i o n ; t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n p e r so n s who have been downw ardly m o b ile i s a lm o s t i d e n t i c a l to t h a t o f th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n . W ith e q u a l num bers g o in g p Em ory S . B o g a r d u s , " S e c o n d G e n e r a t i o n M e x i c a n s , " S o c i o l o g y a n d S o c i a l R e s e a r c h , X I I I ( J a n u a r y - F e b r u a r y , 1 9 2 9 ), 283. R o b e r t H. T a l b e r t , S p a n is h - N a m e P e o p l e i n t h e S o u t h w e s t a n d W est ( F o r t W o rth : T e x a s C h r i s t i a n U n i v e r s i t y , 1955)* P P . 4 5 -4 6 . 270 TABLE 84 GENERATION AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS G e n e ra tio n Type o f M o b ility T o ta l Upward None Downward Num b er P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t F i r s t 5 1 6 .1 15 4 8 .4 11 35.5 31 1 0 0 .0 Second 44 5 1 .2 23 2 6 .7 19 22 .1 86 100. 0 L a te r 10 35-7 8 2 8 .6 10 35 .7 28 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1 .7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 c h i sq u are = 1 2 .8 9 E > = .02 C = . 286 271 up and down, l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s a p p e a r a s a t o t a l i t y to be n o n m o b ile ; i n th e se co n d g e n e r a t i o n a lm o s t e i g h t - t e n t h s o f th e r e s p o n d e n t s a r e e i t h e r h o ld in g t h e i r own o r a d v a n c in g ; o n ly a b o u t t w o - t h i r d s o f th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n a r e so d o in g . The d a ta r e p o r t e d i n T a b le 84. a r e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e .05 l e v e l . In view o f t h e f a c t t h a t th e y o u n g e r g e n e r a t i o n s o f M exican-A m ericans have h a d b e t t e r e d u c a t i o n a l and o c c u p a t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s th a n t h e i r e l d e r s , i t i s u n d e r s t a n d a b l e why t h e d a ta o f T able 85 show t h a t upward m o b i l i t y i s i n v e r s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith a g e . Of th e y o u n g e r r e s p o n d e n t s (aged 20 to 39 )j 5 2 .4 p e r c e n t w ere u p w ard ly m o b ile , b u t o n ly 2 4 .6 p e r c e n t o f th e o l d e r r e s p o n d e n t s (aged 40 o r o v e r ) . On th e o t h e r hand, 4 1 .0 p e r c e n t o f th e o l d e r r e s p o n d e n t s were downw ardly m o b ile , b u t o n ly 17*9 p e r c e n t o f th e y o u n g e r r e s p o n d e n t s . The t a b l e a l s o shows t h a t m ale r e s p o n d e n t s a re d i v i d e d a lm o s t e q u a l l y among th e u p w a rd ly m o b ile , n o nm obile an d downwardly m o b ile c a t e g o r i e s , w h e r e a s th e f e m a le s a r e m ost h e a v i l y r e p r e s e n t e d i n th e upw ard c a t e g o r y and l e a s t so i n th e downward c a t e g o r y . T h is m o b i l i t y a d v a n ta g e , p e rh a p s hypergam y, o f th e fe m a le s com p a r e d t o t h e m ales i s o n ly p a r t i a l l y a c c o u n te d f o r by a g e , 272 TABLE 85 AGE, SEX AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b ility Upward None Downward T o ta l Age and Sex Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r - Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r - Per cen t M ales, 20-29 17 50.0 8 23.5 9 26.5 34 100.0 M ales, 40-89 5 17.2 12 • 4 1 .4 12 4 1 .4 29 100.0 S u b to ta l 22 34 .9 20 31-7 21 3 3 .3 63 99-9 Fem ales, 20-39 27 5 4 .0 17 3 4 .0 6 12.0 50 100.0 Fem ales, 40-89 10 31.2 9 28.1 13 4 0 .6 32 99*9 S u b to ta l 37 45 .1 26 31.7 19 23.2 82 100.0 Both S exes, 20-39 44 5 2 .4 25 29.8 15 17-9 84 100.1 Both S exes, 40-89 15 24 .6 21 34.4 25 4 1 .0 61 100.0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 31-7 4o 27.6 145 100.0 c h i sq u a re c h i sq u a re c h i sq u are (b o th s e x e s ) = (m ales) (fe m a le s) = 13.81 7 .3 4 9 .3 9 P =<• p = • P =<• 01 c 03 01 • 295 273 a l a r g e r p e r c e n ta g e o f b o th th e o l d e r fe m a le s and m ales h a v in g been downwardly m obile t h a n upw ard ly so , b u t w ith o n ly a s l i g h t l y h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e f o r th e m ales ( 4 1 .4 ) th a n f o r th e fe m a le s ( 4 0 . 6 ) . Of th e y o u n g e r r e s p o n d e n ts 5 4 .0 p e r c e n t o f th e fe m a le s and 5 0 .0 p e r c e n t o f th e m ales were up w ard ly m o b ile . When e i t h e r fe m a le s o r b o th se x e s a re c o n s i d e r e d , th e c h i s q u a re i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l ; c h i s q u a re f o r th e m ales i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . T h e i r a v e ra g e y o ung er age and th e o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r a c c u l t u r a t i o n o f f e r e d by m i l i t a r y e x p e r i e n c e s have c o n t r i b u t e d to th e upward m o b i l i t y o f th e v e t e r a n s i n th e M exican-A m erican p o p u l a t i o n . While 4 4 .8 p e r c e n t o f th e v e t e r a n s have been upw ard ly m o b ile , o n ly 25-0 p e r c e n t o f th e m ale n o n - v e t e r a n s were so; on th e o t h e r hand 33-3 p e r c e n t o f th e n o n - v e t e r a n s were downwardly m o b ile , b u t o n ly 2 1 .0 o f th e v e t e r a n s . These d i f f e r e n c e s a re n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . C o n v e rsio n t o P r o t e s t a n t i s m i s a n o th e r f a c t o r w hich h a s been c i t e d as b e in g a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y o f M e x ic a n -A m e rlc a n s. T h e r e fo r e i t i s somewhat s u r p r i s i n g to o b s e rv e T ab le 86 w hich a p p e a rs to show more 274 TABLE 86 RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS R e li g i o u s P r e f e r e n c e Type o f M o b ility T o ta l Upward None Downward Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b er P e r c e n t Num b e r Per c en t C a th o lic 54 4 5 .0 36 3 0 .0 30 25.0 120 100.0 P r o t e s t a n t 5 2 9 .4 6 3 5 .3 6 35-3 17 100.0 None — “ — — • 4 5 0 .0 4 5 0 .0 8 100.0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1-7 40 27.6 145 100.0 chi square =4.42 p = .05 upward m o b i l i t y f o r C a th o l i c s , no ten d en cy f o r P r o t e s t a n t s and a te n d e n cy tow ard downward m o b i l i t y f o r p e rs o n s r e p o r t in g no r e l i g i o u s .a f f i l i a t i o n . Chi sq u are i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . V i r t u a l l y a l l th e l i t e r a t u r e on Mexicans in th e U nited S t a t e s s t r e s s e s th e la c k o f f lu e n c y i n E n g lis h as a s tro n g d e t e r r e n t to upward s o c i a l m o b il i ty . T h e re fo re th e w r i t e r was i n t e r e s t e d i n r e l a t i n g language p r e f e r e n c e to m o b ility d a ta . T able 87 shows t h a t p e rs o n s who spoke Spanish d u rin g th e in te r v ie w were p re d o m in a n tly e i t h e r nonmobile o r downwardly m obile (8 1 .0 p e r c e n t ) , w hile alm ost h a l f (49-5 p e r c e n t ) o f th e E n g lis h s p e a k e rs had been upw ardly m o b ile . The c h i sq u a re f o r t h i s t a b l e i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .01 l e v e l . T able 88 shows t h a t f o r a l l f o u r k i n s h i p r e l a t i o n s h ip s s t u d i e d , re s p o n d e n ts sp e ak in g E n g lis h (o r who spoke bo th lan g u a g es to t h e i r p a r e n t s , o r who were spoken to by t h e i r .c h ild r e n i n E n g lis h ) were more h e a v i ly r e p r e s e n te d among th e upw ardly m o b ile, and l e s s so among th e nonm obile and downwardly m o b ile , th a n th o s e c a s e s in which S panish was u sed . Thus i t i s a p p a re n t t h a t th e u se o f th e E n g lis h language i s d e f i n i t e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward o c c u p a tio n a l 276 TABLE 87 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b ility Upward None Downward T o ta l Language Num Per Num P er Num Per Num Per P r e f e r e n c e b e r c e n t b er c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t S panish 8 19-0 17 4 0 .5 17 40 .5 42 1 0 0 .0 E n g lis h 51 4 9 .5 29 2 8 .2 23 22 .3 103 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 31-7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 chi square =11.82 p = < .01 C = .275 TABLE 88 277 LANGUAGE SPOKEN IN FAMILY AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS ___________Type o f M o b ility _______ Upward None Downward T o ta l Num- P er Num- P er Num- P e r Num- Per b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Language Spoken to P a r e n ts • • E n g lis h o r b o th S panish 19 40 55 -9 3 6 .0 7 39 2 0 .6 3 5 .1 8 32 23 .5 2 8 .8 34 i l l 1 0 0 .0 9 9 .9 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 31-7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 Language Spoken to S p o u s e : E n g lis h S p an ish o r b o th 24 27 6 6 .7 3 8 .6 6 22 1 6 .7 3 1 .4 6 21 16.7 3 0 .0 36 70 100.1 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 51 4 8 .1 28 2 6 .4 27 2 5 .5 106 1 0 0 .0 Language Spoken to C h i l d r e n : E n g lis h S p a n ish o r b o th 29 23 5 0 .0 3 4 .3 16 22 27.6 32.8 13 22 2 2 .4 32.8 58 67 10 0 .0 99.9 T o ta l 52 4 1 .6 38 3 0 .4 35 28.0 125 1 0 0 .0 Language Spoken to R espondent by C h i l d r e n : E n g lis h S p an ish o r b o th 38 11 4 8 .1 2 6 .2 20 17 2 5 .3 4 0 .5 21 14 2 6 .6 3 3 .3 79 42 10 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 49 4 0 .5 37 30 .6 35__ 2 8 .9 121 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re c h i sq u a re = 7 = 5 .55 P = .46 p = “ • a 03 (To sp o u se) 02 (To r e s p o n d e n t by c h i l d r e n 278 m o b i l i t y . The o n ly r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r w hich th e c h i s q u a re t a b l e r e a c h e d th e .05 l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e , how ever, were la n g u a g e spoken to sp o u se and la n g u a g e spoken by c h i l d r e n . W ith r e f e r e n c e t o th e u se o f S p a n is h - la n g u a g e com m u n ic a tio n s m ed ia, T a b le 89 r e v e a l s t h a t , w i t h one e x c e p t i o n , th e p e r c e n t a g e o f u s e r s i s low er among th e u p w a rd ly m o b ile and h i g h e r among th e downw ardly m o b ile th a n th e p e r c e n t a g e o f n o n u s e r s , f o r th e t h r e e m edia o f r a d i o , t e l e v i s i o n and m o v ie s. Only th e c h i s q u a re f o r m ovies r e a c h e s t h e .05 l e v e l o f s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . When a l l f i v e S p a n is h - la n g u a g e m edia o f communica t i o n ( r a d i o , t e l e v i s i o n , m o v ies, n e w sp a p e rs and m a g a z in e s ) a r e c o n s i d e r e d i n te rm s o f th e number o f m edia u t i l i z e d by u p w a rd ly m o b ile , n o n m o b ile and dow nw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s , a s i n T a b le 90, i t i s se e n t h a t among th o s e who u se d two o r fe w e r o f th e f i v e m edia t h e r e was a h i g h e r p e r c e n t age o f u p w a rd ly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s and a s m a l l e r p e r c e n t a g e o f downw ardly m o b ile th a n among th o s e who u s e d t h r e e o r more m e d ia . Upw ardly m o b ile p e r s o n s u s e d a mean o f 1 .2 4 m e d ia , n o nm o bile p e r s o n s 1 .4 3 and dow nw ardly m o b ile 1-75- T h is t a b l e i s s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t a t th e .05 l e v e l . 279 TABLE 89 USE OF SPANISH-LANGUAGE MEDIA OF COMMUNICATION AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b i l i t y Upward None Downward T o t a l Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- P e r b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t Use R a d io 25 3 9-7 22 3 4 .9 16 2 5 .4 63 1 0 0 .0 Do Not Use R adio 34 4 1-5 24 2 9 .3 24 2 9 .3 82 100.1 Use T e l e v i s i o n 32 38.1 25 2 9 .8 27 3 2 .1 84 1 0 0 .0 Do Not Use T e l e v i s i o n 27 4 4 .3 21 3 4 .4 13 2 1 .3 61 1 0 0 .0 A tte n d M ovies 12 2 5 .5 17 3 6 .2 18 3 8 .3 47 1 0 0 .0 Do Not A tte n d M ovies 47 4 8 .0 29 2 9 .6 22 2 2 .4 98 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1 -7 40 2 7 - 6 .1 4 5 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a r e = 7 * 1 9 P = -03 (M ovies) 280 TABLE 90 NUMBER OP SPANISH LANGUAGE MEDIA OF COMMUNICATION USED AND MOBILITY OF RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b ility Number o f Upward None Downward T o ta l Types o f Num- P e r Num- P e r Num- Per Num- P er Media Used b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r cen t b e r c e n t None One Two Three Four 17 18 18 5 1 51-5 4 0 .0 4 2 .9 2 5.0 2 0 .0 9 15 15 7 2 7 .3 3 3 .3 3 5 .7 3 5 .0 7 12 9 8 4 21.2 26.7 21.4 4 0 .0 80.0 33 45 42 20 5 100. 0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0 T o ta l 59 4 0 .7 46 3 1 .7 40 27.6 145 1 0 0 .0 Mean 1.2 4 1 .4 3 1 .7 5 1 .4 4 c h i sq u a re = - 6 .7 7 P = .0 3 CHAPTER V I I I TOWARD A TYPOLOGY OP MEXICAN-AMERICANS B ased on th e f i n d i n g s o f t h i s s t u d y , th e w r i t e r h a s a t t e m p t e d t o c o n s t r u c t a t y p o lo g y o f M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n s . W hile t h e r e s u l t s may n o t be v a l i d f o r any com m unity o t h e r t h a n Pomona, t h e y may s t i l l have h e u r i s t i c v a lu e i n s t u d y in g M exican -A m erican c o m m u n itie s e ls e w h e r e , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n S o u th e r n C a l i f o r n i a . The r e s u l t i n g t y p o l o g y h a s a s t a t u s d im e n sio n and a s o c i o - c u l t u r a l d im e n s io n . The S t a t u s D im ension S o c i a l c l a s s s c a l e s d i s c u s s e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e re v ie w e d b y th e r e s e a r c h e r a p p e a r e d to be o f v e ry l i m i t e d p o t e n t i a l v a lu e I n t h e s t u d y o f Pom ona's M exican -A m erican p o p u l a t i o n , a g ro u p w i t h a c o m p a r a t i v e l y n a rro w s t a t u s r a n g e . The r e s e a r c h e r f u r t h e r m o r e w ish e d t o a v o id a n y m e c h a n ic a l a p p l i c a t i o n o f s t a t u s s c a l e s t o t h e p o p u l a t i o n u n d e r s t u d y . He h a s u s e d h i s own judgm ent c o n s i d e r a b l y i n a s s i g n i n g r e s p o n d e n t s to l e v e l s i n h i s c o n s t r u c t e d s t a t u s 281 282 ty p o lo g y , I n d e e d even I n s e t t i n g up th e ty p o lo g y I n th e f i r s t p l a c e . F u r th e r m o r e , w h ile t h e r e a r e e x t a n t d e s c r i p t i o n s o f t h e c l a s s sy ste m s i n a number o f M exican-A m erican c o m m u n itie s, t h e y m e r e ly d e s c r i b e th e sy ste m s ( u s u a l l y b a s e d on d a t a s e c u r e d from k ey i n f o r m a n t s ) , w i t h o u t g i v in g any s o r t o f n u m e r ic a l I n d e x o r s c a l e . T h e ir a p p l i c a b i l i t y to Pom ona's M exican com m unity, l i k e t h e more q u a n t i t a t i v e c l a s s i n d i c e s , a p p e a re d t o be h i g h l y q u e s t i o n a b l e . T h e r e fo r e th e r e s e a r c h e r a t t e m p t e d t o c o n s t r u c t h i s own ty p o lo g y on t h e b a s i s o f th e r e s u l t s o f t e s t i n g h i s h y p o th e s e s . In r e v ie w in g t h e r e s u l t s o f t e s t i n g t h e s e h y p o th e s e s , th e outcom es w ere g e n e r a l l y i n th e e x p e c te d d i r e c t i o n , w i t h some i m p o r t a n t e x c e p t i o n s . One i m p o r t a n t a s s o c i a t i o n was fo und t o be I n t h e o p p o s i t e d i r e c t i o n : number o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d and o c c u p a ti o n o f r e s p o n d e n t . In t h e c a s e o f s e v e r a l i m p o r t a n t v a r i a b l e s t h e r e were no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s b etw een th e n o n m o b ile and th e downw ardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s ; t h e same was t r u e o f th e d i f f e r e n c e s betw een s k i l l e d and s e m i - s k i l l e d w o r k e rs . R e s i d e n t i a l Area D f r e q u e n t l y d id n o t f i t i n a s c a l e from A to E; on some v a r i a b l e s t h e r e s p o n d e n t s r e s i d e n t t h e r e r a n k e d lo w e r 283 th an th o s e i n C, on some h i g h e r . T h is a r e a , w ith o n ly 10 c a s e s , i s p ro b a b ly an anomaly due to sam pling e r r o r . On most o f th e v a r i a b l e s t h i r d and l a t e r - g e n e r a t i o n r e s p o n d e n ts (m o stly nonm obile p e rs o n s , b o th g e o g r a p h i c a ll y and o c c u p a t i o n a l l y ) resem b led th e im m igrant g e n e r a t i o n more th an th e y d id th e second g e n e r a t i o n . On th e b a s i s o f th e s e r e s u l t s th e w r i t e r has a tte m p te d to c o n s t r u c t a ty p o lo g y p a r t i c u l a r l y d e s c r i p t i v e o f th e community s t u d i e d . The ty p o lo g y was a r r i v e d a t th ro u g h a s e r i e s o f a p p ro x im a tio n s, s t e p by s te p from i n d i v i d u a l v a r i a b l e s th ro u g h v a r io u s c o m b in a tio n s, a t each s ta g e ta k in g i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n th e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s o f v a r i a b l e s o f i n d i v i d u a l re s p o n d e n ts . S u b je c tiv e judgm ents n e c e s s a r i l y e n te r e d i n t o v a r io u s s t a g e s o f th e p r o c e s s , in c l u d i n g c a s e s where d a ta re c o rd e d c o n t r a d i c t e d th e w r i t e r ’ s o b s e r v a t i o n s in th e community and i t s homes. The f i r s t s te p was to examine th e c o r r e l a t i o n s among th e v a r io u s v a r i a b l e s d e a l t w ith in the c o u rse o f th e r e s e a r c h . T able 91 shows th e c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n t i n gency (C) c a l c u l a t e d f o r each o f th e i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s among th e 12 c h i e f v a r i a b l e s o f th e s tu d y . Of th e 66 c e l l s i n th e t a b l e , 2 a re l e f t v a c a n t because each r e p r e s e n t s a s u b c la s s o f a n o th e r v a r i a b l e . Of th e rem ain in g TABLE 91 COEFFICIENTS OF CONTINGENCY FOR MAJOR VARIABLES OF THE STUDY C O C G 8 Q J o w to G G C O < to o C O C Q C O *H 1 — 1 C O i — ! 0) to o 1 Q J c u C G c0 G *H < G G bC O o o •H C O > T J H to G Q J G •H ■ H -P G "H O Q J Q J G •H bQ < D -P -P G -P O P > C O O H cd G C O C O Q ) Q J • r t • H G * H • H o G 0) G a E T J i— I t> to Q J Q J to O O b0 < G cu G o •H C O to £> O to to . c G 0J G Q J o O C O P G C O g k C O G o cd G < u bO o G 0) O O H G 0 ) <H O C O P fG o < o H « S O O 2 (G o o C lass S e lf-P la c e m e n t • 308 .210 N .S .a N.S. N.S. N.S. • 308 N.S. • 350 .430 C lass S e lf-C o n s c io u s n e ss .352 .293 .242 .221 • - ro < T \ -P = - .317 N.S. .210 .460 .324 Number o f C la sse s .274b P e rc e iv e d ■ 373 • 303 .298 .230 N.S. N.S. N.S. c C onsciousness o f C lass D iv is io n s .384 .297 .232 .268 N.S. .227 N.S. N.S. M o b ility .278 .275 . 286 .295 ..465 • 380 N.S. R e s i d e n t i a l Area .170 .270 N.S. N.S. .487 •391 Income .294 • 315 .379 .491 .440 O ccupation .390 .307 .294 .221 Age • 558 .509 • 533 G e n e ra tio n .493 .539 Language P re fe re n c e .534 a N.S. I n d i c a t e s s t a t i s t i c a l l y n o n - s i g n i f i c a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p . ^ R e la tio n s h ip i n d i r e c t i o n o p p o s ite to t h a t p r e d i c t e d . cV a ria b le a s u b c la s s o f c r o s s - v a r i a b l e . 284 285 c e l l s , 49 I n d i c a t e r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r w hich c h i sq u a re r e a c h e d a t l e a s t th e .05 l e v e l o f s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e ; th e c o rr e s p o n d in g C 's a r e g iv e n in th e c e l l s . F o u rte e n o f th e c e l l s m arked "N .S ." r e p r e s e n t r e l a t i o n s h i p s w hich were n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . I t was a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e r e were c l u s t e r s o f v a r i a b le s w hich i n t e r c o r r e l a t e d h i g h ly w ith eac h o t h e r , b u t l e s s h i g h l y w ith o t h e r v a r i a b l e s . In d ex e s were c o n s t r u c t e d f o r eac h o f t h e s e c l u s t e r s . One o f them, c a l l e d by th e w r i t e r " A c c u l t u r a t i o n S t a t u s " c o n s i s t e d o f th e v a r i a b l e s o f s c h o o lin g , lan g u a g e p r e f e r e n c e , g e n e r a t i o n and age; f o r e ac h o f t h e s e f o u r v a r i a b l e s th e h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n s were found to be w ith th e o t h e r t h r e e . A nother such c l u s t e r o f v a r i a b l e s was co m p rised o f o c c u p a tio n , incom e, r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a and m o b i l i t y . R e s i d e n t i a l a r e a and m o b i l i t y were each found to be most h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d w ith o c c u p a tio n and income b u t were n o t c o r r e l a t e d w ith eac h o t h e r . With one e x c e p ti o n , o c c u p a tio n and income were e a c h m ost h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d w ith th e o t h e r two v a r i a b l e s . R egarded s e p a r a t e l y , m o b i l i t y was n o t i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o an In d ex o f "Economic S t a t u s . " The t h i r d c l u s t e r , r e l a t e d to r e s p o n d e n t s ’ c l a s s 286 p e r c e p t i o n s , c o n s i s t e d o f th o s e v a r i a b l e s c a l l e d by th e w r i t e r “C o n s c io u s n e s s o f C la s s D i v i s i o n s , " “Number o f C la s s e s P e r c e i v e d , 1 1 " C la s s S e l f - C o n s c i o u s n e s s ," and “C la s s S e l f - P l a c e m e n t ." F o r t h r e e o f t h e s e v a r i a b l e s , th e se co n d h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n was w i t h s c h o o l in g , f o r one v a r i a b l e i t was th e t h i r d h i g h e s t . O th e rw is e , f o r e a c h o f t h e s e v a r i a b l e s , th e h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n s were foun d t o be w ith th e o t h e r two f e a s i b l e c o m p a ris o n s . An in d e x o f “C la s s C o n s c io u s n e s s " was form ed from th e f i r s t and t h i r d v a r i a b l e s m e n tio n e d ab o v e. In g e n e r a l i t was fo u n d t h a t th e c o n s t r u c t e d i n d e x e s c o r r e l a t e d w i t h e a c h o t h e r more h i g h l y t h a n d id any o f th e com ponents o f th e in d e x e s w ith e a c h o t h e r . " A c c u l t u r a t i o n S t a t u s " and "Economic S t a t u s " w ere found to c o r r e l a t e h i g h l y w i t h m o b i l i t y and w i t h each o t h e r . " C la s s C o n s c io u s n e s s " was fo u n d to c o r r e l a t e h i g h l y w ith " A c c u l t u r a t i o n S t a t u s " b u t n o t w i t h e i t h e r "Economic S t a t u s " o r m o b i l i t y . The n e x t s t e p was to combine a c c u l t u r a t i o n - s t a t u s and e c o n o m ic - s t a t u s s c o r e s i n t o a s i n g l e " S t a t u s I n d e x ." For th e r e l a t i o n s h i p betw een t h e " S t a t u s Ind ex " and m o b i l i t y , t h e o b t a i n e d C o f .470 was h i g h e r th a n th e 287 c o r r e l a t i o n o f m o b i l i t y w i t h any o t h e r v a r i a b l e , b u t n o t c o n s i d e r a b l y above t h a t f o r th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een m o b il i t y and o c c u p a tio n ( .4 2 6 ) . Thus, t h e i n c l u s i o n o f th e o t h e r s i x f a c t o r s r a i s e d th e c o r r e l a t i o n w ith o c c u p a tio n by o n ly 1 0 .3 p e r c e n t . For th e a s s o c i a t i o n betw een " S t a tu s Index" and "C lass C o n sc io u sn e ss" th e o b t a i n e d C o f .445 was l a r g e r th a n t h a t o f th e c o r r e l a t i o n o f any c l a s s p e r c e p t i o n v a r i a b l e w ith any o t h e r v a r i a b l e , e x c e p t th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een "C o n sc io u sn e ss o f C la s s D i v i s i o n s " and " C la ss S e l f - C o n sc io u sn e ss" w hich i s a l i t t l e o v e r 3 p e r c e n t l a r g e r . The o b t a i n e d C o f .3 2 0 betw een th e s t a t u s in d e x and c l a s s s e l f - p l a c e m e n t was h i g h e r t h a n t h a t f o r th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een c l a s s s e l f - p l a c e m e n t and any s i n g l e economic o r a c c u l t u r a t i o n f a c t o r , a lth o u g h I t was l e s s th a n 4 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r th a n t h a t w ith s c h o o lin g and r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a (b o th .3 0 8 ) . I t was n o te d t h a t th e s t a t u s in d e x was more h i g h ly a s s o c i a t e d w ith m o b i l i t y and c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s t h a n th e l a t t e r were w ith e i t h e r o f t h e s e p a r a t e In d e x e s and f u r t h e r t h a t economic s t a t u s as such had v e ry l i t t l e i n f l u e n c e on c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s e x c e p t In so f a r as b o th were a s s o c i a t e d w ith th e f a c t o r s o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n . In r e l a t i v e terras i t was o b se rv e d t h a t th e s t a t u s in d ex s c o r e s g e n e r a l l y c o r r e l a t e d h i g h e r w ith th e a c c u l t u r a t i o n v a r i a b l e s th a n w ith th e economic o n es. S u r p r i s i n g l y , however, th e c o r r e l a t i o n w ith income (.6 1 2 ) was a lm o st as h ig h as t h a t w ith s c h o o lin g (.6 1 4 ) d e s p i te th e f a c t t h a t th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een s c h o o lin g and income was r e l a t i v e l y low (.2 9 4 ) compared t o , f o r exam ple, t h a t between s c h o o lin g and o c c u p a tio n (.4 0 3 ) o r income and o c c u p a tio n (.4 4 0 ) . Yet th e c o r r e l a t i o n between th e s t a t u s in d e x and o c c u p a tio n (.5 5 6 ) was c o n s id e r a b ly l e s s th a n t h a t betw een th e fo rm er and s c h o o lin g o r income. Thus i t could be argued t h a t w h ile o c c u p a tio n by i t s e l f m ight be p e rh a p s th e b e s t s i n g l e i n d i c a t o r o f s o c i a l s t a t u s , i t i s l e s s p o w e rfu l as an in d e x th a n th e combined use o f s c h o o l in g and income. The power o f a c o n s t r u c t e d in d e x b e a r s an i n v e r s e r e l a t i o n s h i p to th e i n t e r c o r r e l a t i o n o f i t s com p o n e n ts , t h a t i s , th e low er th e i n t e r c o r r e l a t i o n s , th e g r e a t e r th e e f f i c i e n c y o f th e in d e x . The o c c u p a tio n a l v a r i a b l e co u ld be re g a rd e d as a m e d ia tin g one; income te n d s to depend on o c c u p a tio n which i n t u r n depends on s c h o o lin g . Thus o c c u p a tio n c o r r e l a t e s h ig h ly w ith b o th s c h o o lin g and incom e, b u t th e l a t t e r two 289 to a much l e s s e r d e g re e w ith each o t h e r . I t may be t h a t s c h o o l in g c r e a t e s th e d e s i r e s and p o t e n t i a l i t i e s f o r a p a r t i c u l a r s t y l e o f l i f e ; a g iv e n income p u r c h a s e s th e n e c e s s i t i e s and sym bols r e q u i s i t e f o r such a s t y l e o f l i f e . N e i t h e r income n o r s c h o o l in g a lo n e g u a r a n t e e s p o s s e s s i o n o f a p a r t i c u l a r s t y l e o f l i f e ; n e i t h e r one g u a r a n t e e s th e o t h e r . F o llo w in g t h i s l i n e o f r e a s o n i n g , t h e w r i t e r p r o c e e d ed to c o n s t r u c t a "S c h o o lin g -In c o m e In d ex " by d i v i d i n g e a c h o f th e v a r i a b l e s i n t o f o u r r a n k e d c a t e g o r i e s e a c h . The in d e x s c o r e .was d e r i v e d by a d d in g s c h o o lin g r a n k to income r a n k . The s c o r e s t h u s d e r i v e d were fo u n d t o be p e r f e c t l y c o n s i s t e n t , w i t h th e e x c e p ti o n o f o n ly one r e s p o n d e n t , w ith th e mean s t a t u s in d e x s c o r e s f o r th e same g ro u p s o f r e s p o n d e n t s . Thus t h e use o f o n ly t h e s e two v a r i a b l e s , s c h o o l in g and Incom e, ra n k e d g ro u p s o f r e s p o n d e n t s i n e s s e n t i a l l y t h e same f a s h i o n as t h e more cumbersome " S t a t u s I n d e x ." C o e f f i c i e n t s o f c o n tin g e n c y w ere c a l c u l a t e d f o r th e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f s c h o o lin g -In c o m e s c o r e t o th e v a r i a b l e s o f th e s tu d y . S in c e th e g e n e r a l s t a t u s in d e x i n c o r p o r a t e d th e m ost i m p o r t a n t o f th e c u l t u r a l and econom ic v a r i a b l e s , and 290 t h e s c h o o lin g - in c o m e s c o r e o n l y tw o, i t was to be e x p e c te d and fo u n d t h a t th e l a t t e r in d e x w ould c o r r e l a t e l e s s h i g h l y w i t h t h o s e v a r i a b l e s . And w h ile t h e c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h m o b i l i t y was a l s o lo w e r , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h t h e c l a s s - p e r c e p t i o n v a r i a b l e s w ere h i g h e r th a n any c o r r e l a t i o n b e tw ee n any o f t h e l a t t e r and any c u l t u r a l o r econom ic c r i t e r i o n o r c o m b in a tio n o f c r i t e r i a . T hus, t h e s c h o o lin g - in c o m e s c o r e s t i l l c o r r e l a t e d h i g h l y w i t h t h e econom ic and c u l t u r a l v a r i a b l e s , a l t h o u g h n o t a s h i g h l y a s d i d t h e g e n e r a l s t a t u s i n d e x , w h ile i t c o r r e l a t e d more h i g h l y w i t h c l a s s - p e r c e p t i o n v a r i a b l e s t h a n d i d any s i n g l e econom ic o r c u l t u r a l c r i t e r i o n o r c o m b in a t i o n o f c r i t e r i a . I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f S t a t u s L e v e ls The n e x t p ro b le m was to a s c e r t a i n w h e th e r t h e c o n s t r u c t e d I n d e x e s c o u ld be u s e d a s t y p o l o g i e s o r w h e th e r t h e y c o u ld be u s e d to I d e n t i f y t h e s t a t u s l e v e l s i n t h e M e x ican -A m erican com m unity a s d e s c r i b e d by t h e w r i t e r ' s r e s p o n d e n t s . Assuming t h a t t h e c o n s t r u c t e d g e n e r a l s t a t u s and s c h o o lin g - in c o m e i n d e x e s w ere ro u g h i n d e x e s o f s o c i a l s t a t u s among t h e p o p u l a t i o n o f M exican d e s c e n t In Pomona, t h e w r i t e r w ished to d i s c o v e r any p o s s i b l e " n a t u r a l " b r e a k s i n th e s t a t u s s c a l e . He i n s p e c t e d th e t a b l e s p r e s e n t i n g t h e c r o s s - t a b u l a t i o n o f th e in d e x e s w ith th e k e y v a r i a b l e s i n an e f f o r t to l o c a t e i n th e f i r s t p l a c e , colum ns o f c e l l s c o n t r i b u t i n g e x c e e d in g ly sm a ll p r o p o r t i o n s o f th e t o t a l c h i s q u a r e , o r s e c o n d ly , b re a k s i n th e s t a t u s con tinuum o c c a s io n e d by sh a rp ch ang es i n p e r c e n t a g e s . I t was much e a s i e r to o b se rv e th e r e l a t i v e hom ogeneity o f r e s p o n d e n ts a t th e ends o f th e s c a l e s th a n i t was to i d e n t i f y b re a k s in th e m idd le o f th e continuum . That i s , th e m ost o b v io u s sh a rp b re a k s were betw een th e lo w e st c a te g o r y and th e n e x t lo w e s t, and betw een t h e h i g h e s t and th e n e x t h i g h e s t . Thus, i t a p p e a re d a t f i r s t s i g h t t h a t t h e community had w e ll d e f in e d lo w er and up per s t a t u s g ro u p s , w ith a continuum (p e rh a p s a r e s i d u a l c a t e g o r y ) i n betw een. These r e s u l t s a p p e a re d to th e w r i t e r t o be b a s i c a l l y c o n s i s t e n t w ith t h e d e s c r i p t i o n s o f Pom ona's M exican- American c l a s s s t r u c t u r e s e c u r e d from i n f o r m a n ts , a lth o u g h no a tte m p t was made e m p i r i c a l l y t o d e m o n s tra te t h i s con s i s t e n c y . The ty p o lo g y w hich h a s been s e t up by th e w r i t e r i s h e a v i l y b a se d on h i s c o n s id e r e d judgm ent, w i t h no 292 a tte m p t to d i s g u i s e i t s a d m i t te d ly s u b j e c t i v e e le m e n t. O b je c tiv e d a ta and i n f o r m a n t s ’ s t a te m e n t s c a r r y one o n ly so f a r ; from t h a t p o i n t onward in fo rm e d i n t e r p r e t a t i o n i s c a l l e d f o r . At one extrem e o f th e continuum i t was e a s y to i d e n t i f y a l e v e l o f s u c c e s s f u l p e o p le , a t the o t h e r a l e v e l o f f a i l u r e s . The l a t t e r c a t e g o r y , c h a r a c t e r i z e d by in fo r m a n t s as " th o s e who d o n ’ t c a r e , " as " th e poor" o r "low er c l a s s " h as been i d e n t i f i e d as C lass I i n th e w r i t e r ' s sy stem . T h is l e v e l c o n s i s t s o f th e p o o r e s t , l e a s t a c c u l- t u r a t e d and l e a s t s k i l l e d p e r s o n s . Most o f th e re s p o n d e n ts b o th w ith incom es o f l e s s th a n $4,000 and w ith l e s s th a n f i v e y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g (hence g e n e r a l l y i l l i t e r a t e o r f u n c t i o n a l l y i l l i t e r a t e ) were grouped h e r e . A ll p e rs o n s on r e l i e f were i n c l u d e d i n t h i s c a te g o r y ; a l l employed p e r s o n s a t t h i s l e v e l a r e l a b o r e r s . A ll th e s e p e o p le l i v e i n th e c o l o n i a . The m ost t y p i c a l o f t h e l e v e l s , w ith th e g r e a t m a j o r i t y o f r e s p o n d e n t s , was d e s i g n a t e d as C lass I I . These p e o p le a r e s t e a d i l y employed as l a b o r e r s , sem i s k i l l e d o r s k i l l e d w o rk e rs , have Incomes o f betw een $4 ,000 and $7*999 and have a t l e a s t f i v e y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g . They 293 l i v e i n a l l a r e a s o f th e c i t y e x c e p t A. W hile m o s tly l i v i n g i n t h e c o l o n i a , t h i s i s th e g ro u p t h a t a t l e a s t " i s t r y i n g . " The r e s e a r c h e r p l a c e d i n C la s s I I I th o s e p e o p le who had i n f a c t a c h ie v e d a m odest d e g re e o f s u c c e s s : th e " s t r i v e r s " who had been d e s c r i b e d by in f o r m a n ts as w a n tin g a b e t t e r l i f e f o r th e m s e lv e s and e s p e c i a l l y f o r t h e i r c h i l d r e n . W hile n o t a c h i e v i n g f u l l m i d d l e - c l a s s s t a t u s , t h e b r e a d w in n e r s i n t h e s e f a m i l i e s a r e among th e more s k i l l e d and b e t t e r p a i d w o rk e rs among Pom ona's M exican- A m ericans. R e sp o n d e n ts w ere c l a s s i f i e d i n I I I p r o v id e d t h e y p o s s e s s e d any one o f t h e f o l lo w in g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s : (a ) th e y r e s i d e d i n Area A a t th e tim e o f th e i n t e r v i e w , % (b) t h e y h a d w h i t e - c o l l a r em ploym ent, o r (c ) had a t o t a l f a m i ly incom e o f $ 8 ,0 0 0 o r o v e r . T hose r e s p o n d e n t s who had a c h ie v e d th e c o m p lete e q u i v a l e n t o f Anglo m i d d l e - c l a s s s t a t u s w ere d e s i g n a t e d a s C la s s IV . T h is I s th e " e l i t e " l e v e l i d e n t i f i e d by i n f o r m a n t s , d e s c r i b e d by th o s e lo w e r I n t h e s t a t u s h i e r a r c h y a s " s o c i e t y , " b u t u s u a l l y by th e m s e lv e s as " m id d le c l a s s , " w hich i n e f f e c t t h e y a r e . T h is i s th e m ost h i g h l y s c h o o le d and m ost p r o s p e r o u s g r o u p . R e sp on d e n t s w ere p u t In t h i s c l a s s p r o v id e d th e y p o s s e s s e d any 294 two o f t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s en u m erated i n th e p r e c e d in g p a r a g r a p h . A ll p r o f e s s i o n a l s and o t h e r c o ll e g e g r a d u a t e s were i n c l u d e d h e r e . Some o f C la s s I I I , b u t a l l o f C lass IV r e s i d e o u t s i d e th e c o l o n i a . In a s s i g n i n g r e s p o n d e n ts to g iv e n s o c i a l c l a s s l e v e l s , th e w r i t e r f e l t i t n e c e s s a r y to make some f o u r t e e n e x c e p ti o n s when a g iv e n a ssig n m e n t d id v i o le n c e to th e s p i r i t o f th e scheme. E x c e p tio n s were made i n c a s e s where income was o b v io u s ly i n c o r r e c t l y r e p o r t e d , when t h e house o r n e ig h b o rh o o d was s u p e r i o r o r f a r i n f e r i o r to i t s s u r ro u n d in g s , hence o u t o f k e e p in g w ith th e c h a r a c t e r o f th e a r e a , when t h e r e was good r e a s o n to q u e s t i o n th e o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y a s s i g n e d , o r when a p e rs o n o b v io u s ly (view ed s u b j e c t i v e l y ) d id n o t " f i t " a g iv e n l e v e l . Having c o n s t r u c t e d t h i s f o u r f o l d ty p o lo g y and h a v in g a s s i g n e d each r e s p o n d e n t to one o f th e f o u r c l a s s l e v e l s , t h e w r i t e r n e x t e x p lo r e d th e r e l a t i o n s h i p s betw een each r e s p o n d e n t 's a s s i g n e d l e v e l and h i s o t h e r r e l e v a n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . C o n tin g en cy t a b l e s were c o n s t r u c t e d and th e s t a t i s t i c s o f c h i s q u a re and i t s d e r i v a t i v e , th e c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n tin g e n c y , were c a l c u l a t e d . In th e d i s c u s s i o n w hich f o llo w s o f t h e r e s u l t s o f such c a l c u l a t i o n s , t h e v a r i a b l e o f a s s i g n e d s t a t u s l e v e l i s r e f e r r e d to a s " s o c i a l c l a s s , " w i t h no i m p l i c a t i o n t h a t s u c h a c o n s t r u c t i s " r e a l " i n a p h i l o s o p h i c s e n s e . The c o n c e p t o f " s o c i a l c l a s s " i s a n o m in a l c o n s t r u c t u s e d by t h e w r i t e r t o d e s c r i b e h i s p e r c e p t i o n o f t h e sy stem o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n w h ich o b t a i n s among p e r s o n s o f M exi can d e s c e n t i n Pomona. S o c i a l C la s s and M o b i l i t y T a b le 92 shows t h a t t h e r e i s o n l y a weak a s s o c i a t i o n b e tw e e n upw ard s o c i a l m o b i l i t y and s o c i a l c l a s s ; th e C f o r t h i s a s s o c i a t i o n i s o n l y .383* I t i s t h u s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y t r u e t h a t h i g h s t a t u s h a s b e en u s u a l l y t h e r e s u l t o f upw ard s o c i a l m o b i l i t y o r low s t a t u s th e r e s u l t o f f a i l u r e v e r t i c a l l y to r i s e i n t h e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e . I n C l a s s IV, f o r e x am p le , a l t h o u g h 9 o u t o f 13 w ere u p w a rd ly m o b ile , t h e o t h e r 4 w ere n o n m o b ile : t h e y w ere w h i t e - c o l l a r o f f s p r i n g o f w h i t e - c o l l a r p a r e n t s , hen ce o f a s c r i b e d m i d d l e - c l a s s s t a t u s . The one p e r s o n i n C la s s I who c o u ld be c o n s i d e r e d u p w a rd ly m o b ile was t h e i l l i t e r a t e w if e o f a s e m i - s k i l l e d w o r k e r . Most o f t h o s e i n C l a s s I w ere n o n m o b ile (11 o u t o f TABLE 92 MOBILITY AND SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENTS Type o f M o b i l i t y C l a s s : : ■ 1 r 1 . ) 11 T o t a l I I I I I I IV Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r : P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Upward 1 1 .7 30 5 0 .8 19 32 .2 9 15 .3 59 10 0 .0 None 11 23.9 27 58 .7 4 8.7 4 8 .7 46 100.0 Downward 6 1 5 . 0 27 67'. 5 7 17.5 ~ — _ — 40 10 0 .0 T o t a l 18 12 .4 84 5 7 .9 30 20.7 13 9-0 145 10 0.0 c h i s q u a r e = 24.95 1 1 A 01 c = .383 r v > vo Ch 297 o f 1 8 ) , a lt h o u g h a c a s e c o u ld be made f o r a l l e g i n g t h a t a l l p e r s o n s on r e l i e f h a d been downw ardly m o b ile . I n a d d i t i o n , 6 o t h e r r e s p o n d e n ts on th e lo w e s t l e v e l h a d in f a c t been downw ardly m o b ile . C l a s s I I c a n b e c o n s i d e r e d a s b e l o w t h e a v e r a g e A n g lo s t a t u s , b u t t h e u s u a l A n g lo e x p l a n a t i o n t h a t t h i s m a j o r i t y o f M e x i c a n - A m e r i c a n s h a v e e i t h e r n o t t r i e d o r n o t s u c c e e d e d i n " g e t t i n g a h e a d " i s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y v a l i d . L ess t h a n o n e - t h i r d {27 o u t o f 84) had i n f a c t been n on - m o b ile . On th e o t h e r hand, th e same p r o p o r t i o n had been downw ardly m o b ile . S i g n i f i c a n t l y , a number o f p a r e n t s o f th e downwardly m obile i n C la s s e s I and I I had worked as s k i l l e d o r w h i t e - c o l l a r w o rk e rs . On th e o t h e r han d , a l a r g e p r o p o r t i o n o f t h o s e i n l e v e l I I (30 o u t o f 84) had been u p w ard ly m o b ile , i . e . , had a t l e a s t im proved t h e i r o c c u p a t i o n a l i f n o t a l s o t h e i r s o c i a l s t a t u s . T h u s w h i l e l e v e l s I arid I I r e p r e s e n t l a r g e l y t h e n o n m o b i l e a n d d o w n w a r d ly m o b i l e r e s p o n d e n t s , t h e o p p o s i t e h o l d s t r u e f o r l e v e l s I I I a n d IV , m o s t o f w hose m em bers h a v e b e e n u p w a r d l y m o b i l e ( r e s p e c t i v e l y 19 o u t o f 30 a n d 9 o u t o f 1 3 ) . 298 S o c i a l C l a s s a n d E c o n o m ic C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R e s p o n d e n t s S i n c e e c o n o m ic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s w e re an i m p o r t a n t c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e s o c i a l c l a s s s c h e m e , i t i s u n d e r s t a n d a b l e t h a t s o c i a l c l a s s r a t i n g s w o u l d c o r r e l a t e h i g h l y w i t h t h e e c o n o m ic v a r i a b l e s . I n f a c t t h e h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n ( .6 4 4 ) o f s o c i a l c l a s s w i t h a n y v a r i a b l e w as w i t h o c c u p a t i o n ( s e e T a b l e 9 3 )> d e s p i t e t h e f a c t t h a t o c c u p a t i o n was o n l y one o f t h e s e v e r a l v a r i a b l e s c o n s i d e r e d . ' No d i s t i n c t i o n h a d b e e n made b e t w e e n s e m i - s k i l l e d w o r k e r s o n t h e o n e h a n d a n d l a b o r e r s o r s k i l l e d w o r k e r s on t h e o t h e r , a n d w h i l e a w h i t e c o l l a r o c c u p a t i o n " q u a l i f i e d " a p e r s o n f o r C l a s s I I I a n d p o s s i b l y f o r C l a s s IV , i t was n o t a r e q u i s i t e f o r m e m b e r s h ip i n t h o s e l e v e l s . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , C l a s s I c o n t a i n e d a l l p e r s o n s on r e l i e f , i t s e l f r a t h e r a n i n d i c a t i o n o f l a c k o f o c c u p a t i o n . C la s s I was composed a lm o s t e x c l u s i v e l y o f l a b o r e r s and p e r s o n s on r e l i e f (17 o u t o f 18) w h ile C la s s IV was c o m p ris e d m o s t l y o f w h i t e - c o l l a r w o rk e rs (11 o u t o f 13)* C l a s s I I was composed m o s tly o f l a b o r e r s and s e m i - s k i l l e d (61 o u t o f 8 5 ) and C l a s s I I I m o s t ly s e m i - s k i l l e d and s k i l l e d TABLE 93 OCCUPATION AND SOCIAL CLASS OP RESPONDENTS C lass I I I I I I IV T o ta l Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per O ccupation b e r c e n t b e r c en t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t L ab o re rs and R e l i e f 17 3 0 .4 37 66.1 2 3.6 56 100.1 S e m i-S k ille d 1 2.7 24 6 4 .9 11 29-7 ,1 2.7 37 10 0.0 S k i l l e d - - _ _ 23 6 7 .6 10 29.4 1 2 .9 34 99-9 White C o lla r ~ — 1 5 -0 8 4 0 .0 11 55-0 20 10 0 .0 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 57-8 31 2 1 .2 13 8 .8 147 10 0.0 c h i sq u are = 104.03 P = < .01 C = .644 66s 300 (21 o u t o f 3 1 ), a lth o u g h t h e r e was v i r t u a l l y no d i f f e r ence i n th e r a t i o o f s e m i - s k i l l e d to s k i l l e d w o rk e rs i n any o f th e f o u r l e v e l s . The n e x t h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n o f s o c i a l c l a s s was w ith income ( .6 3 7 ; see T ab le 9^)* P e rso n s w ith incom es o f l e s s th a n $ 4 ,0 0 0 had been p la c e d i n C la s s I o n ly i f t h e y a l s o had l e s s th a n 5 y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g . On th e o t h e r hand , r e s p o n d e n ts w ith incom es o f $ 8 ,0 0 0 o r more m ight q u a l i f y f o r I I I o r IV , th o u g h such a h ig h income was n o t a n e c e s s a r y r e q u i s i t e f o r m em bership i n such c a t e g o r i e s . The a s s o c i a t i o n o f c l a s s w ith income i s c l e a r , however; th o s e i n C la s s I had a m edian income o f $ 2 ,1 2 5 , th o s e i n I I , $ 5 ,4 1 2 , th o s e i n I I I , $ 8 ,0 0 0 and th o s e i n IV, $ 9 ,0 0 0 . The o n ly r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a ta k e n a c c o u n t o f i n a s s i g n i n g r e s p o n d e n ts to s o c i a l l e v e l s was Area A, th e o n ly d e f i n i t e l y m i d d l e - c l a s s a r e a i n th e c i t y . A re s p o n d e n t was c l a s s i f i e d i n I I I , and p o s s i b l y i n IV, i f he r e s i d e d i n t h i s a r e a . D e s p ite t h i s l i m i t e d u se o f th e a r e a l c r i t e r i on, th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een s o c i a l c l a s s and r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a was found to be f a i r l y h ig h , .528 (se e T ab le 95)* A lthou gh C la s s I I and I I I members l i v e d i n a l l a r e a s o f th e c i t y , no member o f I l i v e d i n e i t h e r A o r D, and a l l TABLE 94 TOTAL FAMILY INCOME AND SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENTS Income C lass T o ta l I I I I I I IV Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t Under $4,000 14 43-8 16 5 0 .0 1 3-1 1 3-1 32 100.0 4 ,0 0 0 -5 ,9 9 9 3 7 .0 34 79 .1 6 13*9 _ _ - - 43 10 0.0 6 ,0 0 0 -7 ,9 9 9 — 28 75-7 7 1 8 .9 2 5 .4 37 10 0.0 8,000 o r o v e r ' --- _ — 2 8 .0 14 5 6 .0 9 3 6 .0 25 100 .0 T o ta l 17 12 .4 80 5 8 .4 28 20.4 12 8 .8 137 10 0.0 Median $2,125 $5,412 $8,000 $9,000 c h i square = 93.3 0 P = < .01 C = .637 301 TABLE 95 RESIDENTIAL AREA AND SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENTS aaasasii i ra il as; C lass I I I I I I IV T o ta l R e s i d e n t i a l Num Per Num Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Area b e r c en t b e r c e n t b e r c en t b e r c e n t b e r c e n t A - - 1 7 .1 5 35-7 8 57 • 1 I t 99-9 B 1 9 .3 9 39.1 8 3 4 .8 5 21 .7 23 99-9 C 8 14.5 39 7 0 .9 8 14.5 _ _ 55 9 9 .9 D - - 5 5 0 .0 5 5 0 .0 10 100.0 E 9 20 .0 31 6 8 .9 5 11.1 45 100.0 T o ta l 18 12,2 85 57-8 31 2 1 .2 13 8 .8 147 10 0.0 c h i sq uare = 5 6 .9 0 p = < . 0 1 c = .528 302 303 members o f IV l i v e d i n e i t h e r A o r B. Members o f I and I I w ere c o n c e n t r a t e d i n C and E ( r e s p e c t i v e l y 17 o u t o f 18 and 70 o u t o f 85) w h ile th o s e i n I I I w ere c o n c e n tr a te d i n A, B, and C (21 o u t o f 31)* A ll p e r s o n s l i v i n g i n D were e i t h e r I I o r I I I . S o c i a l C lass and C u l tu r a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R esp o ndents T ab le 96 shows t h a t w h ile s c h o o lin g i s a c o n t r i b u t i n g f a c t o r In s o c i a l c l a s s , a g iv e n amount by no means g u a r a n t e e s a p a r t i c u l a r c l a s s r a t i n g . The d i f f e r e n c e s a re e a s i e r to se e a t the e x tre m e s : t h e r e w ere no h ig h sc h o o l g r a d u a t e s i n C lass I , w hile m o st o f th o s e In IV (8 out o f 13) were h i g h sc h o o l g r a d u a t e s , and no one had l e s s th a n 9 y e a rs o f s c h o o lin g . On t h e o t h e r han d , th e I n t e r m e d i a t e s t a t u s l e v e l s I I and I I I e a c h in c lu d e d some i n d i v i d u a l s who had n e v e r a t t e n d e d sc h o o l (3 and 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) and some who h a d a tt e n d e d j u n i o r c o ll e g e (4 i n each l e v e l ) . The m edian number o f y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g was f o r l e v e l I , 1 .7 ; f o r I I , 9 . 5 ; f o r I I I , 9 . 8; and f o r IV, 1 2 .0 . T hus, w h ile t h o s e i n I a r e e d u c a t i o n a l l y g r e a t l y h a n d i cap p e d , and th o s e i n IV e d u c a t i o n a l l y a d v a n ta g e d , s c h o o lin g TABLE 96 SCHOOLING AND SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENTS Number o f Years o f S chooling C lass T o ta l I I I I I I IV Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t 0-8 15 25.4 32 5 4 .2 12 20 .3 _ _ , __ 59 99-9 9-11 3 6 .4 31 6 6 .0 8 1 7 .0 5 10.6 47 10 0.0 12 — — --- 22 5 3 .7 11 26 .8 8 1 9 .5 41 100.0 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 5 7 .8 31 21.2 13 8 .8 147 100.0 c h i sq u are = 27.31 P = < .01 C = .396 u> o 305 i s o n ly a p o t e n t i a l f a c t o r i n prom o tin g m o b i l i t y from I I to I I I . Those In I I have on th e a v erag e a lm o st as much s c h o o lin g as th o s e i n I I I , b u t have n o t managed to r i s e above th e o t h e r s w ith r e s p e c t to e i t h e r income, o c c u p a tio n o r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , i . e . , to o b t a i n even some minimum symbol o f m iddle c l a s s s t a t u s . Thus th e c o r r e l a t i o n o f s o c i a l c l a s s w ith sc h o o lin g i s f a i r l y low, - 396. T able 97 shows t h a t most o f th o se In C lass I a re o f th e im m igrant g e n e r a t i o n (12 o u t o f 1 8 ), b u t m ost o f th o se i n IV (11 o u t o f 13) a re second g e n e r a t i o n M exican- A m ericans. C la ss I I I had a l a r g e r p r o p o r t i o n o f second g e n e r a t i o n th a n d id I I (22 o u t o f 31 and 49 o u t o f 85 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) and a s m a ll e r p r o p o r t io n o f f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n (5 o u t o f 31 and 14 o u t o f 85 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . L a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s ( i . e . , n a t i v e - b o r n o f n a t i v e p a r e n t a g e ) were m ost h e a v i l y c o n c e n tr a te d i n I I (22 out o f 2 9); o n ly 2 were i n I , 4 in I I I and 1 i n IV. A ll t h i r d and f o u r t h g e n e r a t i o n p e rs o n s e x c e p t 2 were I n I I j 7 o f 10 " o ld C a l i f o r n i a n s " were i n I I , and 4 o f 6 H isp an o s. Thus th e s o - c a l l e d "S p an ish " were f o r t h e most p a r t i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e as to s o c i a l c l a s s from th e mass o f th e M exican-Am erican p o p u l a t i o n . Of th o s e 11 I n d i v i d u a l s who TABLE 97 GENERATION AND SOCIAL CLASS OP RESPONDENTS G e n era tio n C lass ' T o ta l I I I I I I IV Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t F i r s t 12 37.5 14 4 3 .8 5 15-6 1 3.1 32 1 00.0 Second 4 4 .7 49 5 7 .0 22 25*6 11 1 2 .8 86 100.1 L a te r 2 6 .9 22 75-9 4 13-8 1 3*4 29 10 0.0 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 5 7 .8 31 21,2 13 8 .8 147 100.0 c h i squ are = 29.86 P = < .01 C = .411 u> o Ch 307 were p a r t C a l i f o r n i a n o r p a r t H ispano, a l l b u t one (who was i n I ) , were In I I , th u s more r e s e m b lin g th e "M exican1 ' th a n th e "S p a n ish " p a r e n t . The f a i r l y h ig h c o r r e l a t i o n o f g e n e r a t i o n and s o c i a l c l a s s (.4 1 1 ) I s l a r g e l y a t t r i b u t a b le t o th e s u c c e s s e s o f th e second g e n e r a t i o n . While t h e u se o f th e S p a n ish la n g u a g e may be a d e t e r r e n t to s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , u se o f th e E n g lis h lan g u a g e i s no g u a r a n t e e o f s u c c e s s i n th e s t a t u s r a c e . A ll mem b e r s o f C la s s IV a re f l u e n t i n E n g li s h , b u t o n ly 4 o f th e 18 members o f C la s s I . About th e same p r o p o r t i o n o f C la s s I I and C la s s I I I a re f l u e n t i n E n g lis h (7 2 .9 and 8 0.6 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . The l a c k o f a s t r o n g w e l l - d e f i n e d a s s o c i a t i o n betw een la n g u a g e p r e f e r e n c e and s o c i a l c l a s s shows up In th e r e l a t i v e l y low c o r r e l a t i o n betw een th e tw o, -394, as shown i n T ab le 98- T able 99 shows t h a t th e o l d e r M exicans have been m ost p ro n e to f a l l b e h in d , th e y ounger M exicans m ost l i k e l y t o su c c e e d In g e t t i n g ah ea d . Of th o s e i n C lass I , o n ly 1 6 .7 p a r c e n t w ere u n d e r 40 y e a r s o f a g e , w h ile o n ly 1 5 .4 p e r c e n t o f th o s e i n C la s s IV were 40 y e a r s o f age and o v e r. I n C lass I I , 6 2 .4 p e r c e n t w ere u n d e r 40 and 51*8 o f th o s e i n C lass I I I . Thus th e a s s o c i a t i o n betw een age and s o c i a l TABLE 98 LANGUAGE PREFERENCE AND SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENTS C lass Language I I I I I I IV T o ta l Num b e r Per cen t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t S panish 14 32-6 23 53-5 6 1 4 .0 — 43 100.1 E n g lis h 4 3 .8 62 59-6 25 24 .0 13 12.5 104 99-9 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 5 7 .8 31 21 .2 13 8 .8 147 10 0.0 c h i sq uare = 27.10 P = C .01 C = .394 U) o 00 TABLE 99 AGE AND SOCIAL CLASS OP RESPONDENTS C lass Age I I I I I I IV T o ta l Num- Per b e r c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Under 40 3 3-5 53 6 2 .4 18 2 1 .2 11 1 2 .9 85 100.0 40 and ov er 15 24.2 32 51-6 13 2 1 .0 2 3 .2 62 100.0 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 5 7 .8 31 21 .2 13 8 .8 147 10 0.0 Median 5 6 .6 36. 0 37-0 33.9 c h i sq u are = 18.27 P = < .01 C = .332 309 310 s t a t u s i s n o t a s t r o n g o n e, a s shown by t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n tin g e n c y o f .332 g e n e r a t e d by T ab le 100. The y o un g e s t g r o u p on th e a v e ra g e was IV, w i t h a m edian age o f 3 3 -9 y e a r s , a n d the o l d e s t I , w i t h a m edian o f 5 6 . 6 . On th e o th e r h a n d , th e m ed ian s f o r I I and I I I w ere n o t n o t i c e a b l y d i f f e r e n t , 3 6 .0 a n d 37-0 r e s p e c t i v e l y . T hus, w h ile y o u th may be a n a s s e t I n g e t t i n g a h e a d , I t does n o t g u a r a n t e e s u c c e s s ; f u r t h e r m o r e , some members o f I I may g a in e n t r a n c e to I I I a s t h e i r e a r n i n g s o r s a v i n g s i n c r e a s e w ith age and th e y r e a c h h i g h e r incom es o r can a f f o r d to move i n t o a m i d d l e - c l a s s r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t . S o c i a l C la ss and P e r c e p t i o n s o f R e s p o n d e n ts One o f t h e o r i g i n a l h y p o t h e s e s o f t h e r e s e a r c h was t h a t t h e h ig h e r t h e s t a t u s o f r e s p o n d e n t s , th e more c o n s c io u s they w o u ld be o f t h e i r own s o c i a l s t a t u s and t h a t o f o t h e r s . I n t e r e s t i n g l y , c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s c o r r e l a t e d more h i g h l y ( .4 0 4 ) w ith s o c i a l c l a s s (s e e T a b le 100) th a n did s c h o o l i n g w i t h any o f t h e f o l l o w i n g : c o n s c i o u s n e s s o f c la s s d i v i s i o n s ( . 3 8 4 ) , num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d (.3 7 3 )* c la s s s e l f - c o n s c i o u s n e s s ( . 3 5 2 ) o r c l a s s s e l f - p e r c e p t i o n TABLE 100 SOCIAL CLASS AND CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS C la s s C la s s C o n s c io u s n e s s S co re T o t a l 0 1 2 Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t Num b e r P er c e n t I 13 7 2 .2 4 2 2 .2 1 5 .6 18 1 0 0 .0 I I 19 2 2 .4 21 2 4 .7 45 5 2 .9 85 1 0 0 .0 I I I 4 1 2 .9 8 2 5 .8 19 6 1 .3 31 1 0 0 .0 IV 2 1 5 -4 — — — — 11 8 4 .6 13 1 0 0 .0 T o t a l 38 2 5 .9 33 2 2 .4 76 5 1 .7 147 1 0 0 .0 c h i s q u a re = 3 1 .4 1 p = < . 01 C = . 420 312 ( • 3 0 8 ) , d e s p i t e t h e f a c t t h a t s c h o o l i n g a p p e a r s t o be th e s i n g l e m o st i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r i n c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s . S c h o o lin g - in c o m e s c o r e s c o r r e l a t e d e v en h i g h e r ( . 4 6 5 ) , b u t p e r h a p s h e r e s c h o o l i n g w as w e i g h te d to o h i g h l y , and . 404 i s p r o b a b l y a r e a s o n a b l e a p p r o x i m a t i o n . In any c a s e t h e c o r r e l a t i o n o f c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s w i t h s o c i a l c l a s s i s s i g n i f i c a n t w h i l e t h a t w i t h m o b i l i t y i s n o t . The c o r r e l a t i o n s o f s o c i a l c l a s s w i t h num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d ( . 3 8 2 ) a n d w i t h c l a s s s e l f - p l a c e m e n t ( . 2 8 1 ) a r e much w e a k e r t h a n t h a t w i t h c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s ( s e e T a b l e s 101 and 1 0 2 ) . F o r a l l l e v e l s e x c e p t I , t h e m o dal num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d was 2. The p e r c e n t a g e o f members o f C l a s s e s I I , I I I and IV p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e c l a s s e s w ere n o t n o t i c e a b l y d i f f e r e n t ( 2 4 . 2 5 .8 a n d 2 3 .1 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) . A l l p e r s o n s p e r c e i v i n g f o u r c l a s s e s w ere m em bers o f l e v e l I I . C l a s s IV was t h e g ro u p m o st p r o n e t o p e r c e i v e two c l a s s e s ( 6 1 .5 p e r c e n t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s ) . I t c a n n o t be s a i d t h a t t h e r e i s a s t r o n g te n d e n c y f o r a h i g h e r s t a t u s p e o p l e t o p e r c e i v e m ore c l a s s e s ; a l l t h a t c an s a f e l y be a s s e r t e d i s t h a t h i g h e r s t a t u s p e o p le a r e m ore l i k e l y t h a n lo w e r s t a t u s p e o p l e t o p e r c e i v e two o r t h r e e c l a s s e s t h a n t o p e r c e i v e a s i n g l e c l a s s o r n o t t o be TABLE 101 SOCIAL CLASS AND NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCEIVED C l a s s Number o f C l a s s e s P e r c e i v e d T o t a l 0 1 2 3 4 Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t Num b e r P e r c e n t I 9 5 0 .0 7 38.9 __ „ 2 11.1 . . . . 18 1 00 .0 I I 24 2 8 .2 10 1 1 .8 26 - 3 0 .6 21 24.7 4 4 .7 85 10 0 .0 I I I 5 16.1 7 22.6 11 35-5 8 2 5.8 --- --- 31 10 0 .0 IV 1 7-7 1 7-7 8 61 .5 3 23-1 “ — _ — 13 100 .0 T o t a l 39 26.5 ‘ 25 17-0 45 30.6 34 23-1 4 2 .7 147 99-9 c h i s q u a r e = 23. 13 P = C .01 C = .369 U ) H U ) TABLE 102 SOCIAL’CLASS AND CLASS SELF-PLACEMENT C lass C lass S e lf -Placem ent T o ta l Lower Working Middle Upper Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c e n t I 4 10 0.0 __ __ __ 4 100.0 I I 7 11 .9 14 23.7 37 62.7 1 1 .7 59 100.0 I I I 5 18,5 7 25.9 14 5 1 .9 1 3.7 27 100.0 IV — — — — 2 1 8 .2 8 7 2 .7 1 9 .1 11 10 0.0 T o ta l 16 15-8 23 2 2 .8 59 5 8 .4 3 3 .0 101 10 0 .0 ch i sq uare = 8.63 P = • 02 C = .281 L O 1 — } ■£r 315 a b le t o s t a t e th e number o f c l a s s e s a t a l l . T able 102 w ith I t s C o f o n ly .281 shows t h a t a ssig n m e n t o f s o c i a l s t a t u s by r e s p o n d e n ts and by th e w r i t e r a r e n o t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i n a c c o rd . The use b y r e s p o n d e n t s o f th e term "u p p er" a p p e a rs m e a n in g le s s , i t h a v in g been u sed o n ly by one p e rs o n e a c h i n I I , I I I , and IV . On th e o t h e r hand , no p e r s o n i n IV c a l l e d h i m s e l f "lo w e r c l a s s , " w h ile no r e s p o n d e n t i n I c a l l e d h i m s e l f a n y th in g d i f f e r e n t . T here w ould seem t o be no g a in s a y in g th e n o t i o n t h a t no one i n IV i s a lo w e r c l a s s p e r s o n , even by Anglo s t a n d a r d s , w h ile a l l th o s e in I a r e low er c l a s s , by b o th Anglo and Mexican s t a n d a r d s . A lth o u g h th e h i g h e s t l e v e l o f t h e Mexican g ro u p , p e rh a p s r e l a t i v e l y more c o n s c io u s o f t h e Anglo c l a s s sy s te m , c o n s id e r them s e l v e s m a in ly m id d le c l a s s (8 o u t o f 1 1 ) , th e y may a ls o be c o n s c io u s o f th e e l i t e w i t h i n t h e i r own l e v e l , hence t h i n k o f th e m s e lv e s as i n t h e m id d le p a r t o f th e M exican- Am erican c l a s s sy ste m . Somewhat s u r p r i s i n g l y , a h i g h e r p e rc e n ta g e o f th o s e i n I I th a n I I I c o n s i d e r th e m s e lv e s low er o r w orking c l a s s ( 1 1 .9 and 1 8 .5 ; 23*7 and 2 5 .9 r e s p e c t i v e l y ) and a h i g h e r p e r c e n ta g e a s m iddle c l a s s (6 2 .7 f o r I I and 51*9 f o r I I I ) . These a re s m a ll d i f f e r e n c e s i n any c a s e , and a re c o n g ru e n t w ith th e sm a ll d i f f e r e n c e s found w ith r e g a r d to r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , s c h o o lin g and o c c u p a tio n . S in ce p e r c e p t i o n s o f r e s p o n d e n ts and o f th e r e s e a r c h e r a r e n o t c o n g ru e n t, i t r a i s e s th e q u e s t io n as to w h e th er t h e d i s t i n c t i o n made by t h e w r i t e r betw een l e v e l s I I and I I I i s an a r t i f i c i a l l y s t a t i s t i c a l one, o r one r e f l e c t i n g a c t u a l c o n d i t i o n s i n th e community and p e r c e i v e d by i t s members. The d i s t i n c t i o n betw een th e u se o f "low er c l a s s " and o t h e r te r m in o lo g y i s p e r t i n e n t , and t h e r e i s no q u e s t io n b u t t h a t I and IV a re s e p a r a t e from th e main body, b u t to what e x t e n t more p r e c i s e s ta te m e n t s can be made i s q u e s t i o n a b l e . The S o c i o c u l t u r a l Dim ension I t sh o u ld be a p p a r e n t from th e p r e c e d in g t h a t th e c l a s s d i v i s i o n s p u t a t i v e l y e s t a b l i s h e d by th e r e s e a r c h e r f o r Pom ona's Mexican community do n o t c o rre s p o n d w i t h th e t y p o l o g i e s o f M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s which a p p e a r i n th e l i t e r a t u r e . T h e r e fo r e a r e e x a m in a tio n o f th e more g e n e r a l q u e s t i o n o f th e s o c i a l ty p e s i n th e M e x ic a n -d e sc e n t p o p u l a t i o n a p p e a re d n e c e s s a r y . As a r e s u l t o f h i s re v ie w o f th e l i t e r a t u r e and o f th e Pomona d a t a , th e r e s e a r c h e r 317 p r o p o s e s a M exican-A m erican s o c i o c u l t u r a l ty p o lo g y b a s e d on d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n and l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e . A cco rd in g t o th e l a s t - m e n t i o n e d c r i t e r i o n , M exicans i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s c o u ld be d i v i d e d i n t o (a) te m p o ra ry r e s i d e n t s , (b ) im m ig ra n ts , (c) c h i l d r e n and o t h e r d e s c e n d a n t s o f imm igrants,* (d) d e s c e n d a n ts o f t h e i n h a b i t a n t s o f th e S o u th w e st b e f o r e i t became p a r t o f t h e U n ite d S t a t e s . C a te g o ry ( a ) c o n s i s t s o f p e r s o n s (su c h a s b r a c e r o s , " w e t b a c k s , 1 1 exch an g e s t u d e n t s , t r a v e l l i n g b u s in e s s m e n , d i p l o m a t i c o f f i c i a l s , and t o u r i s t s ) who a r e n o t M exican- A m ericans a c c o r d in g t o th e r e s e a r c h e r ' s d e f i n i t i o n . C a te g o r i e s (b) and (c ) c o n s t i t u t e th e p o p u l a t i o n u s u a l l y r e f e r r e d t o a s M exican-A rnerican. C a te g o ry (d ) i s g e n e r a l l y r e f e r r e d to by a number o f d i f f e r e n t te r m s , d e p e n d in g on g e o g r a p h i c a l l o c a l e , e . g . , " H is p a n o s ," " C a l i f o r n i a n s , " o r " T e x a s -M e x ic a n s ." I t s h o u ld be p o i n t e d o u t t h a t th e w r i t e r ' s t y p o lo g y p r e s e n t s a num ber o f d i f f i c u l t i e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y w ith r e f e r e n c e t o b o u n d a r i e s and to q u a n t i f i c a t i o n . In d e a l i n g w ith d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n to Am erican m id d le - c l a s s norm s, i t i s o b v io u s t h a t t h e d i v i s i o n s w i t h i n eac h o f t h e f o u r ty p e s form a c o n tin u u m , r a t h e r t h a n d i s c r e t e 318 s u b ty p e s . What i s in v o lv e d i s th u s n o t so much ty p in g , a s s c a l i n g . T h is i s a problem n o t d e a l t . w i t h i n t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h ; i t i s in d e e d a c o m p lete r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t i n i t s e l f . W ith r e f e r e n c e to t h e f o u r t y p e s t h e m s e lv e s , i t s h o u ld be o b v io u s t h a t we a r e d e a l i n g w ith i d e a l ty p e s i n t h e W eberian s e n s e . Most o f th e w r i t e r ' s sam ple f i t s n i c e l y i n t o one o r a n o th e r o f th e c a t e g o r i e s o r t y p e s , b u t a c o n s i d e r a b l e number o f c a s e s do n o t . Some i n d i v i d u a l s c o u ld f i t a s w e l l i n t o ( c ) c h i l d r e n and o t h e r d e s c e n d a n ts o f im m ig ra n ts a s i n t o (d) d e s c e n d a n ts o f th e i n h a b i t a n t s o f th e S o u th w e st b e f o r e i t became p a r t o f t h e U n ite d S t a t e s , f o r t h e y a re o f f s p r i n g o f an H isp an o and a M exican im m ig ran t o r a s e c o n d - g e n e r a t i o n M ex ica n -A m erica n . Some r e s p o n d e n t s h ad one Anglo p a r e n t and one p a r e n t from one o f t h e M exican c a t e g o r i e s . In th e l a t t e r c a s e , p a r t i c u l a r l y , t h e a c c u l t u r a t i o n p i c t u r e becom es c lo u d y . Thus a new q u e s t i o n a r i s e s a s to when i s a p e rs o n t o be r e g a r d e d a s M exican and when a s an A nglo. T hus, n o t o n l y a r e t h e r e d i f f i c u l t i e s i n d e f i n i n g e a c h o f th e t y p e s , c l a s s i f y i n g p e r s o n s i n t o them, b u t t h e r e i s a ls o t h e d i f f i c u l t y o f d raw ing t h e b o u n d a r ie s o f t h e M exican-A m erican e t h n i c 319 g ro u p I t s e l f , a problem f i r s t b ro a c h e d i n C h a p te r I I o f t h e p r e s e n t p a p e r , and c e r t a i n l y n o t s e t t l e d by th e w r i t e r ' s r e s e a r c h . A n o th e r c o m p lete r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t i s t h e r e b y i n d i c a t e d . T a b le 103 shows t h e c r o s s - c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f t h e w r i t e r ' s sam ple a c c o rd in g to th e s t a t u s and s o c i o c u l t u r a l d im e n sio n s o f h i s t y p o l o g i e s . The r e s u l t s a r e e s s e n t i a l l y t h e same a s t h o s e p r e s e n t e d i n T a b le 9 7 > w here s o c i a l c l a s s was c r o s s - t a b u l a t e d w ith g e n e r a t i o n . The c h i s q u a r e f o r T able 103 i s s l i g h t l y l a r g e r , t h e r e b y l e n d i n g some s u p p o r t to c la im s o f v a l i d i t y f o r t h e t y p o lo g y . T here I s a t l e a s t some a s s o c i a t i o n b etw een i t s two s t u d i e d dim en s i o n s (th e t h i r d d im e n sio n , t h a t o f d e g re e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n was n o t s t u d i e d i n t h e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h ) . TABLE 103 CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS IN STATUS AND SOCIOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS OF TYPOLOGY S o cio c u l t u r a l Type C lass 1 ' ■ i ■ ! - » - T o ta l I I I I I I IV Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t Num b e r Per c en t Num b e r Per c e n t B 12 37.5 14 43-8 5 15-6 1 3-1 32 10 0 .0 C 4a 4.5 50a -» b 56.8 23 26.1 l l a 12.5 88 99-9 CD 1 9-1 10 90 .9 - - 11 100.0 D 1 6 .2 l l b 6 8 .8 3 1 8 .8 1 6 .2 16 100.0 T o ta l 18 1 2 .2 85 57-8 31 2 1 .2 13 8 .8 147 10 0.0 c h i sq u a re = 30.26 p = < . 01 C = .413 a In c lu d e s one h a lf-A n g lo p e rs o n . ^ In c lu d e s one h a lf - M is s io n In d ia n p e rso n . 320 CHAPTER VII SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION I n an a t t e m p t t o e x p l o r e some o f t h e d im e n s io n s o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n among p e r s o n s o f M exican d e s c e n t i n th e c i t y o f Pomona, t h e w r i t e r t e s t e d a num ber o f h y p o t h e s e s r e l a t e d to c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s and s o c i a l m o b i l i t y and a t t e m p t e d t o d e l i n e a t e th e s o c i a l s t a t u s system o f th e com m unity and c o n s t r u c t a t y p o lo g y o f M e x ic a n -A m e ric a n s . The w r i t e r assum ed t h a t th e p o p u l a t i o n u n d e r s tu d y was u n d e r g o in g t h e c l o s e l y r e l a t e d p r o c e s s e s o f u r b a n i z a t i o n , a c c u l t u r a t i o n and s o c i a l m o b i l i t y , and t h a t s t u d y i n g t h e s e p r o c e s s e s i n a h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t and t h e i r a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h g e n e r a l l y r e c o g n i z e d r e l e v a n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h i s p o p u l a t i o n , t h a t an u n d e r s t a n d i n g c o u ld be g a i n e d o f t h e o n g o in g dyn am ics o f s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n o f t h i s M exican d e s c e n t p o p u l a t i o n . The w r i t e r h y p o t h e s i z e d t h a t h i g h e r s t a t u s p e r s o n s would be m ore c l a s s c o n s c i o u s and a l s o r a t e th e m s e lv e s h i g h e r i n t h e s t a t u s s t r u c t u r e and t h a t c l a s s c o n s c i o u s n e s s , 321 322 s t a t u s , and m o b i l i t y would be a s s o c i a t e d w ith a number o f c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f r e s p o n d e n t s , n o t a b l y n e g a t i v e l y w ith a g e , b u t p o s i t i v e l y w i t h o c c u p a tio n , incom e, r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , s c h o o lin g , and u se o f t h e E n g li s h la n g u a g e . T h e .d a ta s e c u r e d f o r t h e t e s t i n g o f th e h y p o th e s e s , and r e p o r t e d and a n a ly z e d i n th e p r e c e d in g c h a p t e r s , were s e c u r e d c h i e f l y th ro u g h i n t e r v i e w s w ith 147 r e s p o n d e n t s , c o n s t i t u t i n g a 6 p e r c e n t a r e a sample o f th e a d u l t p e r s o n s o f Mexican d e s c e n t o f Pomona. The M exican Community The h i s t o r i c a l developm ent o f t h e p a t t e r n o f M exican-A m erican s e t t l e m e n t i n th e a r e a was ta k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n th r o u g h o u t th e r e s e a r c h . What i s now Pomona was f i r s t s e t t l e d from Mexico by M exican c i t i z e n s , b u t s h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r became p a r t o f th e U n ited S t a t e s . B ecause o f a d v e rs e w e a th e r and m ark e t c o n d i t i o n s , and an i n a b i l i t y to compete e c o n o m ic a lly and p o l i t i c a l l y w ith th e incom ing A m ericans, th e g r e a t S p a n is h - s p e a k in g landow ning f a m i l i e s l o s t v i r t u a l l y a l l t h e i r la n d s i n th e 1 8 7 0 's and 1880*s . C a t t l e r a n c h e s became fa rm s, o r c h a r d s and r e s i d e n t i a l la n d . A c i t r u s f r u i t i n d u s t r y sp ra n g up, r a i l r o a d s c o n v e rg e d on Pomona i n th e l a t e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y , w h ile M exican im m ig ra n ts came i n l a r g e num bers i n t h e e a r l y t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y t o p i c k th e f r u i t and work on th e r a i l r o a d s . The im p o v e ris h e d o l d e r f a m i l i e s c a l l e d th e m s e lv e s ’'S p a n i s h 1 ’ to d i s t i n g u i s h th e m s e lv e s from t h e im p o v e r is h e d new com ers, who began to c o n s t i t u t e th e lo w er s tr a tu m o f a s e m i - c a s t e sy ste m . The l a t t e r began t o b re a k down d u r in g t h e World War I I p e r i o d , when many M exicans d e s e r t e d th e f i e l d s f o r i n d u s t r i a l em ploym ent. At th e same tim e , some M exicans began t o move away from th e e t h n i c e n c la v e i n s o u th w e s te rn Pomona to a l l s e c t i o n s o f th e c i t y . W hile t w o - t h i r d s s t i l l l i v e d i n th e e n c la v e by i th e tim e o f t h e w r i t e r ’ s s tu d y , th e M exicans o f Pomona had a lm o s t c o m p le te ly d e s e r t e d a g r i c u l t u r a l f i e l d em ploym ent. I t was a p r o p i t i o u s tim e to i n v e s t i g a t e th e em ergin g c l a s s s t r u c t u r e and th e e x t e n t o f p a s t m o b i l i t y o f th e p o p u l a t i o n , s i n c e t h e r e had been no r e c e n t s t u d i e s o f M exican- A m erican s t r a t i f i c a t i o n s y s te m s , and none done on an a r e a - s a m p le b a s i s . Changes i n s t r a t i f i c a t i o n and m o b i l i t y have been p r i m a r i l y c o n c o m ita n ts o f th e i n t e r r e l a t e d p r o c e s s e s o f u r b a n i z a t i o n and a c c u l t u r a t i o n . The Im m ig ran ts moved from 324 a p re d o m in a n tly r u r a l c o u n try to a much more u rb a n one. H ere, an i n c r e a s i n g l y l a r g e r p e rc e n ta g e o f them and t h e i r d e s c e n d a n ts have moved from r u r a l a r e a s to towns; the towns th e m se lv e s have become i n c r e a s i n g l y u r b a n iz e d o r s u b u rb a n iz e d ; M exican-A m ericans have i n c r e a s i n g l y tu rn e d from a g r i c u l t u r a l employment to i n d u s t r i a l , comm ercial and g o v e rn m e n ta l employment. A c c u l tu r a tio n has meant p r i m a r i l y a moving from l o w e r - c l a s s Mexican c u l t u r e w ith i t s g r o u p - c e n te r e d , t r a d i t i o n a l v a lu e s , to m id d l e - c l a s s American c u l t u r e w ith i t s i n d i v i d u a l i s t i c , d e f e r r e d g r a t i f i c a t i o n and s u c c e s s - c e n t e r e d v a lu e s . Many M exicans have a c q u ire d th e m o tiv a t i o n to become upw ardly m o b ile , p a r t i c u l a r l y as a r e s u l t o f i n c r e a s i n g amounts o f s c h o o lin g and i n c r e a s i n g c o n ta c t s w ith Anglos a s s e g r e g a tio n b a r r i e r s have been removed. M o b ility and a c c u l t u r a t i o n have been two c l o s e l y a s s o c i a te d p r o c e s s e s . M exicans in Pomona have n o t been i n t e g r a t e d in to Anglo v o l u n ta r y a s s o c i a t i o n s i n la r g e num bers, w ith the e x c e p tio n o f l a b o r u n io n s and th e p a r e n t s ' and t e a c h e r s ' a s s o c i a t i o n s . The v a s t m a j o r i t y , 100 o u t o f 128, w hether C a th o lic o r P r o t e s t a n t , a t t e n d Mexican c h u rc h e s. S o c ial 325 c o n t a c t s w ith e i t h e r Anglos o r M exicans a re m o s tly l i m i t e d to th e jo b , c h u rc h , n e ig h b o rh o o d , and k i n s h i p g ro u p . The h a n d fu l o f p e r s o n s who have a c h ie v e d p o s i t i o n s o f l e a d e r s h ip among t h e i r f e llo w M exican-A m ericans a re f a i r l y w id e l y , b u t n o t u n i v e r s a l l y known by th e l a t t e r . The w r i t e r u se d a v a r i e t y o f o b j e c t i v e and s u b j e c t i v e c r i t e r i a t o ran k (from A to E) th e m ajo r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s (5) o f t h e c i t y a c c o rd in g to s o c i a l d e s i r a b i l i t y . The r e s p o n d e n ts (10) from one a r e a (D), how ever, d id n o t * i c o n s i s t e n t l y r a n k above th o se i n E o r below th o s e i n C. I t was found t h a t the h i g h e r ra n k in g a r e a s had a h i g h e r r a t e o f home ow n ersh ip th a n th e low er r a n k in g a r e a s . Rank o f a r e a and r a n k in th e h i e r a r c h y of o c c u p a ti o n a l s k i l l s were a ls o found to be h i g h l y a s s o c i a t e d . With th e e x c e p t i o n o f Area D, median income was p o s i t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith ra n k o f a r e a . F u rth e rm o re , ran k o f a r e a and ra n k o f p e r c e n ta g e o f r e s p o n d e n ts in te r v ie w e d i n E n g lis h were p e r f e c t l y c o r r e l a t e d . The h i g h e r ra n k in g a r e a s had a h i g h e r p e rc e n ta g e o f m a rrie d r e s p o n d e n t s . H ig h er p r o p o r t i o n s o f s e c o n d - g e n e r a t io n re s p o n d e n ts w ere to be found in th e h i g h e r ra n k in g a r e a s t h a n th e p r o p o r t i o n o f th e f i r s t - g e n e r a t i o n o r t h i r d - o r l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n r e s p o n d e n ts 3 2 6 ( i n c l u d i n g H isp an o s and " o ld C a l i f o r n i a n s " ) . The f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n was c o n c e n t r a t e d in t h e lo w e r - r a n k in g a r e a s , t h e t h i r d and l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s i n th o se o f th e i n t e r m e d ia te ra n k . S t a t u s P e r c e p t i o n and S o c i a l M o b i l it y In t h e i n t e r v i e w s th e w r i t e r a tte m p te d to s e c u r e r e s p o n d e n t s ' e v a l u a t i o n s o f t h e i r own s t a t u s , d e s c r i p t i o n s o f th e c l a s s sy ste m , and e v id e n c e o f i n t e r g e n e r a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y . In e a c h c a s e th e w r i t e r a tt e m p t e d to a s c e r t a i n w h e th e r t h e r e w ere any r e l a t i o n s h i p s b etw een r e s p o n d e n t s ' p e r c e p t i o n s o f th e c l a s s system a n d su ch econom ic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s as o c c u p a t i o n , income, a n d r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a and su c h c u l t u r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a s s c h o o l in g and use o f the S p a n is h la n g u a g e . A b a s i c a s s u m p tio n o f t h e stu d y was t h a t r e s p o n d e n t s used t h e same c r i t e r i a i n e v a l u a t i n g o t h e r s ' s t a t u s a s th e y u s e d i n e v a l u a t i n g t h e i r own, and t h a t c e r t a i n c r i t e r i a - - v a r i a b l e s a l t h o u g h n o t m e n tio n e d by r e s p o n d e n t s , a f f e c t t h e i r p e r c e p t i o n s . When a sk e d as t o th e m ost i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e s to be fo u n d among th e M exicans o f Pomona, an i n a r t i c u l a t e , r e t i c e n t o r i g n o r a n t 4 1 . 5 p e r c e n t c o u ld n o t answ er th e 327 q u e s t i o n . Of th o s e who c o u ld , a b o u t t w o - f i f t h s answ ered i n term s o f c l a s s o r socio eco n o m ic s t a t u s , a b o u t a t h i r d i n term s o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n d i f f e r e n c e s , a t e n t h i n term s o f e d u c a t i o n , a t e n t h i n term s o f p e r s o n a l q u a l i t i e s and a t w e n t i e t h i n term s o f r e l i g i o u s d i f f e r e n c e s . When d i r e c t l y a sk e d ab o u t s o c i a l - c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s among th e M exicans o f Pomona, s l i g h t l y o v e r o n e - f o u r t h o f t h e r e s p o n d e n ts were u n a b le o r u n w i l li n g to answ er th e q u e s t i o n . T h e r e f o r e i t c a n n o t be assumed t h a t s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n c o n c e p ts a r e u n i v e r s a l l y m a t t e r s o f common know ledge among t h e s e p e o p le . F u rth e rm o re , th o s e r e s p o n d e n t s who d i v i d e d Pomona’ s M exicans i n t o two o r more s o c i a l c l a s s e s o r s t r a t a were s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t on a number o f c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s from th o s e who d id n o t do so : t h e y had more s c h o o lin g , th e y p l a c e d th e m s e lv e s h i g h e r i n th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , t h e y were y o u n g e r, had h i g h e r incom es and more were i n t e r v i e w e d i n E n g li s h . F u rth e rm o re , t h e y were more a c t i v e o r g a n i z a t i o n a l l y and were more h e a v i l y r e p r e s e n t e d i n l a t e r th a n e a r l i e r g e n e r a t i o n s . Of r e s p o n d e n t s a n sw e rin g th e q u e s t i o n a b o u t s o c i a l c l a s s 23-1 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d one c l a s s , 4 1 .7 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d two, 31-5 p e r c e n t p e r c e i v e d t h r e e , and o n ly 3-7 328 p e r c e n t f o u r . T hus, o f t h o s e p e r c e i v i n g c l a s s d i f f e r e n c e s , t h e overw helm ing m a j o r i t y p e r c e i v e d two o r t h r e e c l a s s e s . The g e n e r a l p i c t u r e w hich em erged from d e s c r i p t i o n s o f t w o - c l a s s sy ste m s was t h a t o f a p o o r , s e m i - l i t e r a t e g ro u p o f u n a c c u l t u r a t e d and u n s k i l l e d w o rk e rs ( o f t e n s a i d n o t to " c a r e " o r t o " t r y " ) and t h e i r f a m i l i e s a s th e b o t tom s t r a t u m . The u p p e r s t r a t u m , g e n e r a l l y r e f e r r e d t o a s "m idd le c l a s s , " was s a i d to c o n s i s t o f p e r s o n s w ith s k i l l e d o r w h ite c o l l a r j o b s , and who were c o n c e rn e d w i t h e d u c a ti o n and " g e t t i n g a h e a d ." A few in f o r m a n ts (from among th o s e p e r c e i v i n g t h r e e o r f o u r c l a s s e s ) f u r t h e r v a r i o u s l y s u b d i v i d e d t h i s u p p e r s t r a tu m i n t o (a) a r e s p e c t a b l e g ro u p o f w o r k i n g - c l a s s p e o p le , i n t e r e s t e d i n an e d u c a ti o n and g e t t i n g a h e a d ; (b) w h ite c o l l a r w o r k e r s , e s p e c i a l l y w e l l e d u c a te d and a c c u l t u r a t e d ; (c ) a b u s i n e s s o r p r o f e s s i o n a l s o c i a l and c i v i c e l i t e . T here was a d e f i n i t e te n d e n c y to e q u a te "w orking c l a s s " and "m idd le c l a s s . " Among t h o s e in f o r m a n ts p e r c e i v i n g two s o c i a l c l a s s e s , o n ly two d i s t i n g u i s h e d betw een "w orking" and " m id d le ." The m ost f r e q u e n t d i s t i n c t i o n made was b etw een "m id d le " and " l o w e r ." The d i s t i n c t i o n 329 betw een b l u e - c o l l a r and w h i t e - c o l l a r w o rk e rs was n o t co n s i d e r e d to be r e l e v a n t to c l a s s d i s t i n c t i o n s by th o s e in f o r m a n ts who d e s c r i b e d a t w o - c l a s s system . D e s c r i p t i o n s o f t h r e e - c l a s s sy stem s f e l l i n t o two main t y p e s : ( a ) a t r i p a r t i t e d i v i s i o n i n t o economic o r o c c u p a ti o n a l l e v e l s ; and (b) a d i v i s i o n i n t o " d o n 't c a r e , " " s t r i v e r " and " e l i t e " l e v e l s . Only one in f o rm a n t p e r c e i v in g t h r e e c l a s s e s made any d i s t i n c t i o n betw een w h ite c o l l a r and m anual w o rk e rs . D e s c r i p t i o n s u se d i n c h a r a c t e r i z i n g th e d i f f e r e n t s o c i a l c l a s s e s were p u t u n d e r a number o f d i f f e r e n t c a t e g o r i e s . Almost t w o - f i f t h s o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts d e s c r i b i n g th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e u se d c r i t e r i a o f econom ic p o s i t i o n , w h ile a f i f t h u s e d o c c u p a tio n , a lm o st a f i f t h u se d th e c r i t e r i o n o f o r i e n t a t i o n to w a rd upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y and a lm o st a f i f t h t h a t o f way o f l i f e . Almost a s i x t h u se d e d u c a t i o n , and a lm o s t a s e v e n th u sed c r i t e r i a r e l a t e d to s o c i a b i l i t y . S u r p r i s i n g l y , no r e s p o n d e n t u se d r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a i n c h a r a c t e r i z i n g any M exican s o c i a l c l a s s . The num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d by r e s p o n d e n ts was r e l a t e d to a number o f v a r i a b l e s . Thus, th e more s c h o o lin g a r e s p o n d e n t h a d , th e more l i k e l y he was to p e r c e i v e two 330 c l a s s e s th a n one c l a s s , b u t s c h o o l in g made no d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f t h r e e o r f o u r c l a s s e s . P e rso n s s p e a k i n g E n g l i s h i n th e i n t e r v i e w were more h e a v i l y r e p r e s e n t e d among th o s e p e r c e i v i n g two o r more c l a s s e s th a n th e S p a n is h s p e a k e r s . S i m i l a r l y , p e r s o n s u n d e r 40 p e r c e i v e d on th e a v e ra g e a l a r g e r number o f c l a s s e s t h a n d i d th o s e 40 and o v e r , and l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s p e r c e i v e d more c l a s s e s th a n e a r l i e r o n e s d id . On th e o t h e r h a n d , th e mean num ber o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d was ( c o n t r a r y t o t h e w r i t e r ' s h y p o t h e s i s ) i n v e r s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith r a n k o f o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r y . Of t h e 91 r e s p o n d e n t s d e s c r i b i n g b o th th e Mexican and Anglo c l a s s s y s te m s , 38 p e r c e i v e d more Anglo th a n M exican c l a s s e s , 51 p e r c e i v e d th e same number and o n ly 2 p e r c e i v e d more M exican t h a n Anglo c l a s s e s . Thus t h e y p e r c e i v e d a more com plex c l a s s system f o r th e A ng los, w ith a m odal number o f two M exican c l a s s e s (4 1 .7 p e r c e n t ) and t h r e e Anglo c l a s s e s (5 6.7 p e r c e n t ) . Of t h e t o t a l sam p le, 2 J . 2 p e r c e n t c o u ld n o t o r w ould n o t s t a t e t h e i r p e r c e p t i o n o f t h e i r own s o c i a l c l a s s m em bership. These l e s s c l a s s - c o n s c i o u s p e r s o n s w ere s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t i n a num ber o f ways from th e o t h e r r e s p o n d e n t s . They h ad lo w e r in c o m e s, w ere o l d e r , w ere 331 S p a n i s h - s p e a k i n g , h a d l e s s s c h o o l i n g , and f e w e r o f t h e m en w e re v e t e r a n s . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e y h a d l e s s s k i l l e d o c c u p a t i o n s , w e re m o re h e a v i l y r e p r e s e n t e d among t h e i m m i g r a n t s t h a n among t h e A m e r i c a n - b o r n , a n d s p o k e more S p a n i s h i n t h e hom e. The l a r g e r t h e n u m b e r o f c l a s s e s p e r c e i v e d , t h e l e s s was t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f n o t b e i n g a b l e t o s t a t e o n e ' s s e l f - p e r c e i v e d s o c i a l c l a s s . U p w ard ly a n d down w a r d l y m o b i l e r e s p o n d e n t s w e r e b e t t e r a b l e t o s t a t e t h e i r s o c i a l c l a s s p o s i t i o n t h a n t h e n o n m o b i l e . Of t h e r e s p o n d e n t s a b l e a n d w i l l i n g t o c a t e g o r i z e t h e m s e l v e s , 3 - 0 p e r c e n t c l a s s i f i e d t h e m s e l v e s a s u p p e r c l a s s , 5 8 . 4 p e r c e n t a s m i d d l e c l a s s , 2 2 . 8 p e r c e n t a s w o r k in g c l a s s , a n d 15*8 p e r c e n t a s l o w e r c l a s s . The h i g h e r a r e s p o n d e n t r a t e d h i m s e l f , t h e l a r g e r w as th e n u m b e r o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s h e p e r c e i v e d and t h e l e s s l i k e l y he w as n o t t o b e a b l e t o s t a t e t h e n u m b e r o f s o c i a l c l a s s e s a t a l l . R e s p o n d e n t s i n t h e h i g h e r r a n k i n g r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s r a n k e d t h e m s e l v e s h i g h e r t h a n t h o s e I n t h e lo w e r r a n k i n g a r e a s . R e s p o n d e n t s i n h i g h e r r a n k i n g o c c u p a t i o n a l c a t e g o r i e s r a n k e d t h e m s e l v e s h i g h e r , e x c e p t t h a t s e m i s k i l l e d w o r k e r s on t h e a v e r a g e r a t e d t h e m s e l v e s h i g h e r 332 th a n s k i l l e d w o rk e rs . R e sp o n d e n ts w ith a g r e a t e r amount o f s c h o o lin g ra n k e d th e m s e lv e s h i g h e r th a n th o s e w ith l e s s s c h o o l in g , and E n g l i s h - s p e a k e r s ra n k e d th e m s e lv e s h i g h e r t h a n S p a n i s h - s p e a k e r s . In s tu d y in g i n t e r g e n e r a t i o n a l o c c u p a t i o n a l m o b i l i t y , t h e w r i t e r fo u n d no a s s o c i a t i o n betw een f a t h e r ' s o c c u p a t i o n and r e s p o n d e n t 's e d u c a t i o n , b u t a s t r o n g a s s o c i a t i o n b etw een t h e l a t t e r and r e s p o n d e n t 's o c c u p a tio n . F u r t h e r m ore, t h e n u l l h y p o t h e s i s o f no a s s o c i a t i o n betw een f a t h e r ' s and r e s p o n d e n t 's o c c u p a tio n c o u ld n o t be r e j e c t e d . Upwardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n ts had th e h i g h e s t m edian y e a r s o f s c h o o lin g ( 1 0 .7 ) , a lt h o u g h t h a t f o r th e nonm obile and down w a rd ly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n ts was th e same (8 .5 )* Of a l l r e s p o n d e n ts 4 0 .1 p e r c e n t had been u p w ardly m o b ile , 31*3 p e r c e n t nonm obile and 27*2 p e r c e n t down w a rd ly m o b ile . These p e r c e n t a g e s a r e e s p e c i a l l y a t t r i b u t a b le t o th e f a c t t h a t o f a l l r e s p o n d e n ts whose f a t h e r s were s e m i - s k i l l e d 6 0 .0 p e r c e n t w ere downwardly m o b ile , o f th o s e whose f a t h e r s w ere s k i l l e d , 6 3 -3 p e r c e n t were down w a rd ly m o b ile ; and o f th o s e whose f a t h e r s were w h ite c o l l a r w o rk e r s , 7 0 .6 p e r c e n t w ere downwardly m o b ile . The l a r g e p e r c e n t a g e s o f u p w ard ly and no nm obile r e s p o n d e n ts were l a r g e l y due t o t h e f a c t t h a t o f t h o s e r e s p o n d e n t s w h o se f a t h e r s w e r e l a b o r e r s , 6 2 . 6 p e r c e n t h a d b e e n u p w a r d l y m o b i l e , a n d t h a t 5 6 . 5 p e r c e n t o f a l l f a t h e r s h a d b e e n l a b o r e r s . I t i s t h e r e f o r e , u n d e r s t a n d a b l e t h a t m o s t o f t h e s e m i - s k i l l e d , s k i l l e d , a n d w h i t e c o l l a r r e s p o n d e n t s h a d b e e n u p w a r d l y m o b i l e . -More o f t h e s e m i - s k i l l e d t h a n o f t h e s k i l l e d h a d b e e n u p w a r d l y m o b i l e , b u t f e w e r t h a n t h e w h i t e c o l l a r w o r k e r s . On t h e o t h e r h a n d w e l l o v e r h a l f o f a l l r e s p o n d e n t s who w e r e l a b o r e r s h a d b e e n dow n w a r d l y m o b i l e . T h u s , I n a g e n e r a l w ay , h i g h o c c u p a t i o n a l s t a t u s i s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h u p w a r d m o b i l i t y , i n t h e r e s p o n d e n t g e n e r a t i o n ; t h e r e v e r s e h o l d s t r u e i n t h e t r a n s i t i o n fro m t h e p a r e n t a l g e n e r a t i o n . T h e r e i s no s u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e f o r t h e a s s e r t i o n t h a t u p w a r d l y m o b i l e M e x i c a n s t a k e o n a " S p a n i s h 1 ' i d e n t i f i c a t i o n ; o n l y o n e - f i f t h o f t h e u p w a r d l y m o b i l e i n t h e w r i t e r ' s s a m p l e h a d d o n e s o , a s c o n t r a s t e d w i t h o n e - t e n t h o f t h e n o n m o b i l e a n d a lm o s t o n e - s i x t h o f t h e d o w n w a r d ly m o b i l e . U p w a r d ly m o b i l e p e r s o n s t e n d e d t o p l a c e t h e m s e l v e s h i g h e r i n t h e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e t h a n d i d t h e o t h e r r e s p o n d e n t s , b u t a s I n t h e c a s e o f e t h n i c s e l f - i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h e d i f f e r e n c e w as n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . 334 There was a ls o a n o n s i g n i f i c a n t ten d en cy f o r downwardly m obile p e rs o n s to p e r c e iv e a l a r g e r number o f s o c i a l c la s s e s th an th e upw ardly m o b ile . Most re s p o n d e n ts i n t h e i r l a s t r e s i d e n t i a l move had moved to a home i n an a r e a o f th e same ran k ; o f th o se who d id n o t , about two and a h a l f tim es as many re s p o n d e n ts moved i n t o a h ig h e r ra n k in g a re a as moved i n t o a low er r a n k in g a r e a . There was no a s s o c i a t i o n o f o c c u p a tio n a l m o b il i t y and ty p e o f r e s i d e n t i a l m o b il i ty , perh ap s because o f th e d i f f e r e n t tim e s c a le o f each. With one e x c e p tio n , th e h i g h e r th e income c a te g o ry , th e h ig h e r was th e p e rc e n ta g e o f upw ardly m obile re s p o n d e n ts , and th e low er th e p e rc e n ta g e o f th e downwardly m ob ile. M o b ility and s c h o o lin g were a ls o found to be a s s o c i a t e d . The second g e n e r a t i o n has been the most upward l y m o b ile : 51-2 p e r c e n t as c o n t r a s t e d w ith o n ly 15*6 p e r c e n t o f th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n and 34.5 p e r c en t o f th e g e n e r a tio n s a f t e r th e second. C onv ersely, th e second g e n e r a tio n had th e lo w e st p e rc e n ta g e o f downwardly m ob ile, 22.1 p e r c e n t as c o n t r a s t e d w ith 34.4 p e r c e n t f o r th e f i r s t g e n e r a t i o n and 34.5 p e r c e n t f o r g e n e r a tio n s a f t e r th e second. And a lth o u g h l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s had a low er 335 median age than th e second g e n e r a tio n , age was i n v e r s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward m o b ility . Use o f th e E n g lis h language was found to be p o s i t i v e l y a s s o c i a t e d w ith upward m o b il i ty , and use o f S p a n ish -lan g u ag e communication media found t o be i n v e r s e l y a s s o c i a t e d . S ta tu s and S o c i o c u l t u r a l T y polo gies The w r i t e r concluded h i s study w ith an a tte m p t to c o n s t r u c t s t a t u s and s o c i o c u l t u r a l ty p o lo g ie s fo r Mexi cans in th e United S t a t e s . The i n t e r c o r r e l a t i o n s o f the main v a r i a b l e s o f th e stu d y were examined to see i f th e re was any c l u s t e r i n g t o g e t h e r . I t was found th a t c e r t a i n v a r i a b l e s c o r r e l a t e d much more h ig h ly w ith some v a r i a b l e s than w ith o t h e r s . One o f the i d e n t i f i e d c l u s t e r s in c lu d e d the v a r i a b l e s o f s c h o o lin g , language p r e f e r e n c e , g e n e r a t i o n and age; a n o th e r c l u s t e r in c lu d e d o c c u p a tio n , income, r e s i d e n t i a l a re a and m o b ility ; a t h i r d c l u s t e r was com p r i s e d o f v a r i a b l e s r e l a t e d to r e s p o n d e n ts ' c la s s p e r c e p t i o n s . The w r i t e r c o n s tr u c te d an index f o r each o f th ese th r e e c l u s t e r s o f v a r i a b l e s and c a l l e d them , r e s p e c t i v e l y , " a c c u l t u r a t i o n s t a t u s , " "economic s t a tu s " (which e x clu d ed th e v a r i a b l e o f m o b i l i t y ) , and " c la s s c o n s c io u s n e s s ." The 336 a s s o c i a t i o n s m easured by th e c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n tin g e n c y among th e s e t h r e e in d e x e s were g e n e r a l l y h i g h e r t h a n f o r any o f th e I n t e r c o r r e l a t i o n s o f th e components o f th e s e in d e x e s . In a d d i t i o n , upw ardly m obile and downwardly m o b ile re s p o n d e n ts were found t o have a h i g h e r d e g re e o f c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s th a n th e no n m o b ile, b u t th e d i f f e r e n ce s were n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t . The w r i t e r com bined th e a c c u l t u r a t i o n and economic i n d i c e s I n t o a s i n g l e " s t a t u s i n d e x ," d e r i v e d from a r i t h m e tic a d d i t i o n o f the; two s c o r e s . I t was co n clu d ed t h a t economic s t a t u s as su c h had v e ry l i t t l e I n f l u e n c e on c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s e x c e p t i n so f a r as b o th w ere a s s o c i a t e d w ith th e f a c t o r s o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n . I t was f u r t h e r fo u n d t h a t th e s t a t u s i n d e x 's c o r e s c o r r e l a t e d more h i g h ly w i t h s c h o o l in g and income th a n w i t h any o t h e r v a r i a b l e s , d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t th e c o r r e l a t i o n betw een s c h o o lin g and income was much low er th a n t h a t betw een s c h o o lin g and o c c u p a tio n o r income and o c c u p a ti o n . Thus w h ile o c c u p a tio n by i t s e l f m ig h t have b e e n c o n s id e r e d th e b e s t s i n g l e i n d i c a t o r of s o c i a l s t a t u s i t w ould be l e s s p o w e rfu l a s an in d e x than th e combined u se o f s c h o o lin g and incom e. The w r i t e r n e x t c o n s t r u c t e d a sc h o o lin g -in c o m e 337 in d e x , th e s c o r e s f o r which were found to he a lm o st p e r f e c t l y c o n s i s t e n t w ith th e mean g e n e r a l s t a t u s s c o r e s f o r th e same group o f r e s p o n d e n ts . The u se o f o n ly t h e s e two v a r i a b l e s th u s ra n k e d r e s p o n d e n ts i n e s s e n t i a l l y th e same f a s h i o n as th e g e n e r a l s t a t u s in d e x . I n s p e c t i o n o f th e b re a k s i n th e two c o n tin u a r e v e a l e d , in t h e w r i t e r ' s judgm ent, th e a p p earan ce o f f o u r s t a t u s l e v e l s o r c a t e g o r i e s . A m iddle l e v e l c o n ta in e d much more th a n h a l f o f a l l r e s p o n d e n ts . Below t h i s l e v e l were th e p o o r e s t , l e a s t a c c u l t u r a t e d , and l e a s t s k i l l e d p e rs o n s in th e Mexican community. P e rso n s above th e m id dle l e v e l were d iv id e d i n t o two l e v e l s , a lo w e r one c o n s i s t i n g o f th e more s k i l l e d and b e t t e r p a id s t e a d i l y employed w o rk e rs and t h e i r f a m i l i e s , and an u p p e r one c o n s i s t i n g o f th e most p r o s p e r o u s and m ost h i g h ly s c h o o le d i n d i v i d u a l s . A ll o f th e l a t t e r group were o f w h i t e - c o l l a r s t a t u s and m ost o f them l i v e d in t h e b e t t e r r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s . A ll r e s p o n d e n ts e x c e p t 14 c a s e s " s u b j e c t i v e l y ” a s s ig n e d e lse w h e re were a s s ig n e d t o t h e s e l e v e l s (denom inated I , I I , I I I , and IV) on th e b a s i s o f a number o f c r i t e r i a . I f a p e rs o n p o s s e s s e d one o f t h e fo llo w in g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s he was c l a s s i f i e d i n I I I , i f he p o s s e s s e d two, i n IV: (a) r e s i d e d In 338 Area A, (b) had w h i t e - c o l l a r em ploym ent, (c ) had an income o f $ 8 ,0 0 0 o r o v e r. R esp o n d e n ts i n I had incom es o f l e s s th a n $ 4 ,0 0 0 and had l e s s th a n 5 y e a r s o f s c h o o l in g . A ll p e r s o n s on r e l i e f were p l a c e d i n I . On th e o t h e r hand, a l l p r o f e s s i o n a l s and a l l c o l l e g e g r a d u a t e s were c l a s s i f i e d i n IV. S o c i a l c l a s s , i n th e se n se o f th e l e v e l s j u s t d i s c u s s e d , was foun d to c o r r e l a t e w eak ly w ith upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y . I t was t h e r e f o r e n o t t r u e among t h i s Mexican p o p u l a t i o n t h a t h ig h s t a t u s i s alw ays th e r e s u l t o f upward s o c i a l m o b i l i t y o r low s t a t u s th e r e s u l t o f a f a i l u r e v e r t i c a l l y t o r i s e i n th e c l a s s s t r u c t u r e , a lth o u g h m ost o f th o s e i n IV had been u p w ard ly m o b ile and m ost o f th o s e i n I n o n m o b ile. L e v e ls I and I I r e p r e s e n t l a r g e l y th e non- m o b ile and downwardly m o b ile r e s p o n d e n t s , w h ile m ost o f th o s e i n I I I and IV had been u p w a rd ly m o b ile . S o c i a l c l a s s was found to c o r r e l a t e more h i g h l y w ith o c c u p a tio n th a n w ith any o t h e r v a r i a b l e , d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t o c c u p a tio n was o n ly one o f th e s e v e r a l v a r i a b l e s c o n s i d e r e d . The n e x t h i g h e s t c o r r e l a t i o n s w ere w ith i n come, r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a , g e n e r a t i o n , s c h o o lin g , la n g u a g e p r e f e r e n c e , and a g e . 339 1 C la ss c o n s c io u s n e s s was found to c o r r e l a t e more h i g h l y w ith s o c i a l c l a s s th an d id s c h o o lin g w ith any s t a t u s - p e r c e p t i o n v a r i a b l e , d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t s c h o o l in g a p p e a rs to be th e s i n g l e m ost im p o r ta n t f a c t o r in c l a s s c o n s c io u s n e s s . I t was n o t p o s s i b l e to a s s e r t t h a t t h e r e was s tr o n g te n d e n c y f o r h i g h e r s t a t u s p e o p le to p e r c e iv e more c l a s s e s ; a l l t h a t c o u ld s a f e l y be a s s e r t e d was t h a t h i g h e r s t a t u s p e o p le were more l i k e l y th an lo w er s t a t u s p e o p le to p e r c e i v e two o r t h r e e c l a s s e s th a n to p e r c e i v e a s i n g l e c l a s s o r n o t to be a b le to s t a t e th e number o f c l a s s e s a t a l l . Assignm ent o f s o c i a l s t a t u s by re s p o n d e n ts and by the w r i t e r were n o t found t o be s u b s t a n t i a l l y in a c c o rd . The use o f th e term "up per" a p p e a re d to be m e a n in g le s s , b u t no p e rs o n in C la ss IV c a l l e d h im s e lf "lo w er c l a s s " w h ile no re s p o n d e n t i n C la ss I c a l l e d him s e l f a n y th in g d i f f e r e n t . A ll th o s e i n C la s s I would a p p e a r t o be lo w e r c l a s s by b o th Mexican and Anglo s t a n d a r d s . The h i g h e s t s t a t u s grou p, p e rh a p s more c o n sc io u s o f th e Anglo sy stem , c o n s id e r e d th e m se lv e s m a in ly m iddle c l a s s . The sm a ll d i f f e r e n c e s in c l a s s s e l f - a s s i g n m e n t 340 betw een t h o s e r e s p o n d e n t s i n l e v e l s I I and I I I r a i s e d th e q u e s t i o n a s to w h e th e r th e d i s t i n c t i o n made by t h e w r i t e r betw een l e v e l s I I and I I I was an a r t i f i c i a l l y s t a t i s t i c a l o r s u b j e c t i v e o n e, o r one r e f l e c t i n g a c t u a l c o n d i t i o n s In th e M exican-A m erican community as p e r c e i v e d by i t s members. The d i s t i n c t i o n b e tw ee n th e u s e o f " lo w e r c l a s s " an d o t h e r te r m in o l o g y i s p e r t i n e n t , and t h e r e i s no q u e s t i o n b u t t h a t I and IV a r e s e p a r a t e from th e m ain body, b u t f u r t h e r a s s e r t i o n s a r e q u e s t i o n a b l e . The c l a s s d i v i s i o n s p u t a t i v e l y e s t a b l i s h e d by th e w r i t e r do n o t c o r r e s p o n d c l o s e l y e i t h e r w ith th e s o c i a l s t r a t i f i c a t i o n sy ste m s o r w i t h th e t y p o l o g i e s o f M exicans I n th e U n ite d S t a t e s w hich a p p e a r i n th e l i t e r a t u r e . T hese l a t t e r t y p o l o g i e s a r e s o c i o c u l t u r a l r a t h e r t h a n c l a s s - o r i e n t e d , c o n fu s e s e v e r a l l e v e l s o f a b s t r a c t i o n , and a r e g e n e r a l l y outm oded. D i f f e r e n t w r i t e r s h av e used l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e , o c c u p a t i o n , s o c i a l c l a s s , n a t i v i t y , c i t i z e n s h i p , r e l i g i o n , l e g a l i t y o f e n t r y , and p h y s i c a l t y p e . Some have em ployed a s p u r i o u s d i s t i n c t i o n b etw een "M exican" and " S p a n i s h ." Most o f th e t y p o l o g i e s u s e more th a n one o f th e s e c r i t e r i a , n o t n e c e s s a r i l y th e same ones f o r e ac h t y p e d e s c r i b e d . M o reo ver, t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s 341 e n c o u n t e r e d l e a v e o u t t h e m o st c r u c i a l v a r i a b l e o f a l l , d e g r e e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n t o A nglo n o r m s : i n e a c h o f t h e t y p e s d e s c r i b e d t h e r e a r e t h o s e g r o u p s a n d i n d i v i d u a l s who a r e r e l a t i v e l y m ore o r i e n t e d t o w a r d M e x ic a n c u l t u r e t h a n a r e o t h e r s . T h e se t y p o l o g i e s a r e a l s o s t a t i c . T h ey do n o t r e f l e c t a n u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f p o s s i b l e t y p e s a s r e s u l t s o f t h e e f f e c t s o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n a l p r o c e s s e s o p e r a t i n g w i t h i n a f r a m e w o r k o f h i s t o r y . The h i s t o r i c i t y o f t h e t y p o l o g i e s i s n o t g e n e r a l l y a c k n o w l e d g e d . The w r i t e r p r o p o s e d a t y p o l o g y o f M e x ic a n s b a s e d on d e g r e e o f a c c u l t u r a t i o n and l e n g t h o f r e s i d e n c e . E a c h o f t h e f o l l o w i n g g r o u p s c o u l d b e d i v i d e d a l o n g a c o n tin u u m g o i n g fro m t h e l e a s t a c c u l t u r a t e d g r o u p t o t h e m o s t- a c c u l t u r a t e d g r o u p ; t e m p o r a r y r e s i d e n t s , i m m i g r a n t s , c h i l d r e n and g r a n d c h i l d r e n o f i m m i g r a n t s , a n d d e s c e n d a n t s o f t h e i n h a b i t a n t s o f t h e S o u t h w e s t b e f o r e i t becam e p a r t o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s . T h i s t y p o l o g y p r e s e n t s a n u m b e r o f d i f f i c u l t i e s w i t h r e f e r e n c e to b o u n d a r i e s a n d t o q u a n t i f i c a t i o n , i . e . , s c a l i n g . V /ith r e f e r e n c e t o t h e t y p e s th e m s e l v e s , w h ic h a r e W e b e r ia n i d e a l t y p e s , m o s t o f t h e w r i t e r ' s s a m p le f i t s n i c e l y i n t o o n e o r a n o t h e r o f t h e c a t e g o r i e s , b u t a c o n s i d e r a b l e n u m b e r do n o t , e . g . , o f f s p r i n g o f a n y two o f t h e t y p e s . L i k e w i s e , some r e s p o n d e n t s h a d one A n g lo p a r e n t a n d o n e p a r e n t fro m o n e o f t h e M e x ic a n c a t e g o r i e s . H ence o n e o f t h e u n r e s o l v e d p r o b l e m s o f t h e r e s e a r c h i s t h e o p e r a t i o n a l i z a t i o n o f d e f i n i t i o n s o f t h e d i f f e r e n t M e x ic a n t y p e s , a n d o f t h e t o t a l M e x ic a n - A m e r ic a n e t h n i c g r o u p a s a w h o le . A P P E N D I C E S APPENDIX A 1 . 2 . 3 - 4 . 5 - 6 . 7 - 8 . 9 - 10 . 11. 12. 13 . 14 . INTERVIEW SCHEDULE (ENGLISH VERSION) How l o n g h a v e y o u l i v e d a t t h i s a d d r e s s ? Do y o u own o r r e n t t h i s h o u s e ? W hat w as y o u r a d d r e s s b e f o r e y o u m oved h e r e ? How l o n g d i d y o u l i v e a t . t h a t a d d r e s s ? A re y o u m a r r i e d , s i n g l e , w id o w e d , d i v o r c e d , o r s e p a r a t e d ? How m any p e o p l e l i v e h e r e ? W hat i s t h e i r r e l a t i o n s h i p t o y o u ? W hat s c h o o l ( s ) do y o u r c h i l d r e n a t t e n d ? Do y o u h a v e a n y o t h e r r e l a t i v e s l i v i n g h e r e ? ( S t a t e r e l a t i o n s h i p t o r e s p o n d e n t ) A re t h e r e a n y o t h e r p e o p l e l i v i n g h e r e ? (N u m b er) W hat l a n g u a g e do y o u o r d i n a r i l y u s e i n s p e a k i n g t o y o u r p a r e n t s ? W hat l a n g u a g e do y o u o r d i n a r i l y u s e I n s p e a k i n g t o y o u r w i f e ( h u s b a n d ) ? W hat l a n g u a g e do y o u o r d i n a r i l y u s e i n s p e a k i n g t o y o u r c h i l d r e n ? W hat l a n g u a g e do y o u r c h i l d r e n u s e i n s p e a k i n g t o y o u ? A re y o u a v e t e r a n ? 344 345 15- Do you s u b s c r i b e to any new spaper? Which o n e ( s ) ? 16. Are t h e r e any m agazin es t h a t you e s p e c i a l l y l i k e t o re a d ? 17* Do you have any f a v o r i t e program s on r a d i o o r TV? 18. Do you e v e r l i s t e n to o r w atch S p a n is h -la n g u a g e program s? 19. Do you go to th e m ovies? About how o f t e n w ould you sa y you go to see an American movie? 20. About how o f t e n would you say you go to see a movie i n S p anish? 21. When someone a sk s you "What i s y ou r n a t i o n a l i t y ? " What do you u s u a l l y answ er? 22. What would you say a r e th e m ost im p o r ta n t d i f f e r e n c e s fo und among th e p e o p le o f Mexican (o r S p a n is h - s p e a k in g ) o r i g i n h e re i n Pomona? T hat i s , what d i f f e r e n t g ro u p s o r ty p e s would you d iv id e them i n t o ? 23- Who would you sa y a r e th e m ost im p o r ta n t p e o p le o f Mexican (o r S p a n i s h - s p e a k i n g ) o r i g i n h e re i n Pomona? 24. Why a re th e y I m p o r ta n t p e o p le ? 2 5 . P e rh ap s you have h e a r d p e o p le speak o f th e s o - c a l l e d s o c i a l c l a s s e s , such as t h e u p p e r c l a s s , th e w orking c l a s s , t h e lo w e r c l a s s , th e m iddle c l a s s , and so on. Among th e p e o p le o f M exican (o r S p a n is h - s p e a k in g ) o r i g i n h e r e i n Pomona how many s o c i a l c l a s s e s would you sa y t h e r e a r e ? What do you c a l l them? 26. Can you d e s c r i b e th e k in d s o f p e o p le who b e lo n g i n e a c h o f t h e s e c l a s s e s ? F o r exam ple, what a r e th e p e o p le l i k e who b e lo n g to t h e . . . c l a s s ? 27. Which s o c i a l c l a s s would you p u t y o u r s e l f in ? 346 28. Now, c o n s i d e r i n g a l l th e p e o p le o f Pomona, ex ce p t th o s e o f Mexican d e s c e n t , would you say t h a t t h e r e a re v a r i o u s s o c i a l c l a s s e s ? How many a re t h e r e ? What do you c a l l them? 29. Can you d e s c r i b e th e k in d s o f p e o p le who b e lo n g i n each o f t h e s e c l a s s e s ? For exam ple, what a r e the p e o p le l i k e who b e lo n g to th e . . . c l a s s ? 30. Would you t e l l me where you work? 31. How lo n g have you been t h e r e ? 32. What i s y o u r job t h e r e ? 33* Where does y ou r w ife work (o r h u sb a n d )? 34. How lo n g h a s she (he) been t h e r e ? 35* What i s h e r ( h i s ) job t h e r e ? 3 6 . Does anyone e l s e h e r e i n th e h o u se work? I f so, w here and what k in d o f work does he ( s h e ) do? R e l a t i o n s h i p O c cu p a tio n Firm a* b . c . ; 37* Would you mind t e l l i n g me a p p ro x im a te ly t h e t o t a l an n u al income r e c e i v e d by y our fa m ily ? 3 8 . W ill you t e l l me i f you b e lo n g t o any o r g a n i z a t i o n s , s o c i e t i e s o r c lu b s ? Do you go to . any p a r t i c u l a r church? Which one? Do you b e lo n g to any s o c i e t i e s o r c lu b s a t th e chu rch ? 39* Do you b e lo n g t o a u n io n ? a s o c i a l club? a v e t e r a n s o r g a n i z a t i o n ? any p o l i t i c a l o r g a n i z a t i o n ? a lo d g e? any c i v i c o r g a n i z a t i o n ? any L a t i n American o r g a n i z a t i o n o r s o c i e t i e s ? any o t h e r c l u b s , s o c i e t i e s , o r a s s o c i a t i o n s ? 347 40. W ould y o u m in d t e l l i n g me y o u r a g e ? 41. How f a r d i d y o u go i n s c h o o l ? 42. How f a r d i d y o u r w i f e ( h u s b a n d ) go i n s c h o o l ? 43. A v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n o n b i r t h p l a c e , o c c u p a t i o n , c i t i z e n s h i p , g r a d e s c o m p l e t e d a n d d a t e o f e n t r y t o U. S. ( f o r p e r s o n s b o r n i n M e x i c o ) . Y e a r P e r s o n B i r t h p l a c e O c c u p a t i o n C i t i z e n s h i p E n t e r e d U .S . S u b j e c t F a t h e r M o th er G r a n d p a r e n t s 1) 2 ) 3). 4) S pouse F a t h e r - i n - l a w M o t h e r - i n - l a w S p o u s e 's g r a n d p a r e n t s x) 2 ) 3) 4) 1 . 2. 3- 4. 5- 6 . 7* 8. 9. 10 . 11 . 12 . 13- 14. 15- APPENDIX B INTERVIEW SCHEDULE (SPANISH VERSION) C u d n to t i e m p o h a v l v i d o Ud. e n e s t a c a s a ? Le p e r t e n e c e l a c a s a o l a e s t d r e n t a n d o ? En dc5nde v i v f a a n t e s de c a m b i a r a q u f ? C u d n to t i e m p o v i v i d e n e s a c a s a ? E s Ud. c a s a d o , s o l t e r o , v i u d o , d i v o r c i a d o o r s e p a r a d o ? C u d n t a s p e r s o n a s v i v e n a q u f ? C u d l . p a r e n t e s c o t i e n e n c o n U d .? A c u d l e s c u e l a v a ( n ) s u ( s ) h i j o ( s ) ? T i e n e Ud. o t r o s p a r i e n t e s v i v i e n d o a q u f e n l a c a s a ? ( I n d i q u e e l p a r e n t e s c o ) Hay o t r a s p e r s o n a s q u e v i v e n a q u f ? C u d n t a s ? A c o s tu m b r a Ud. h a b l a r l e s a s u s p a p d s en e s p a n o l o en i n g l e s ? A c o s tu m b r a Ud. h a b l a r l e a s u e s p o s a ( o ) en e s p a n o l o e n i n g l e s ? A c o s tu m b r a Ud. h a b l a r l e s a s u s h i j o s en e s p a n o l o e n i n g l e s ? S u s h i j o s l e h a b l a n e n e s p a n o l o e n i n g l d s ? E s Ud. V e t e r a n o ( a ) ? R e c i b e Ud. a l g d n p e r i d d i c o ? C u d l? 348 349 16. C u i le s r e v i s t a s o r m a g a z in e s l e g u s t a n l e e r ? 17- T ie n e Ud. a lg u n o s p ro g ram a s f a v o r i t o s en e l r a d i o o en l a t e l e v i s i o n ? 18. E scucha o ve Ud. l o s p ro g ram a s en e s p a n o l? 19• Va Ud. a l c in e ? Cada cuOndo va Ud. a v e r una p e l f c u l a a m e ric a n a ? 20. Cada cuOndo va Ud. a v e r una p e l f c u l a en e s p a n o l? 21. Cuando a l g u i e n l e p r e g u n t a , "CuOl e s su n a c i o n a l l d a d ? " quO a c o stu m b ra Ud. c o n t e s t a r l e ? 22. CuOles d i r f a Ud. que son l a s d i f f e r e n c i a s mas i m p o r t a n t e s que se e n c u e n tr a n e n t r e l a s p e r s o n a s de o r i g e n m exicano a q u f en Pomona? Es d e c i r , en quO g ru p o s o t i p o s l a s p o n d r f a Ud.? 23- QuiOnes d i r f a Ud. que son l a s p e r s o n a s mas i m p o r t a n t e s e n t r e l a g e n te de o r i g e n m exicano a q u f en Pomona? 24. PorquO son p e r s o n a s i m p o r t a n t e s ? 2 5 . Q uizes Ud. ha o fd o m e n ta r l a s lla m a d a s c l a s e s s o c i a l e s , a s f como l a c l a s e a l t a , l a c l a s e , t r a b a j a d o r a , l a c l a s e h u m ild e o b a j a , l a c l a s e m ed ia, e t c . E n tr e l a g e n te de o r i g e n m exicano a q u f en Pomona cuO ntas c l a s e s s o c l a l e s o p in a Ud. que hay? cOmo l a s lla m a ? 26. Puede Ud. d e s c r i b i r m e l o s t i p o s de g e n te que p e r t e n e c e n a cada una de e s t a s c l a s e s ? Asf p o r e je m p lo , cOmo e s l a g e n te que p e r t e n e c e a l a . . . c l a s e ? 2 7 . A cuOl de l a s c l a s e s s o c i a l e s c r e e Ud. que p e r t e n e c e ? 28. S i tomamos en c u e n ta to d a l a g e n te de Pomona, con l a e x c e p c io n de l a s p e r s o n a s de o r i g e n m ex ica n o , c u ^ n ta s c l a s e s s o c i a l e s d i r f a Ud. que hay? C u r ie s son? 2 9 . Puede Ud. d e s c r i b i r m e l o s t i p o s de g e n te que p e r t e n e c e n a cada unade e s t a s c l a s e s ? A sf, p o r 350 30. Q uiere Ud. decirm e d ln d e t r a b a j a ? 31. C u ln to s tiem po ha t r a b a j a d o a l l f ? 32. C u ll e s su t r a b a j o a l l f ? 33- D<5nde t r a b a j a su e s p o s a ( o ) ? 34. Cuanto tiem po ha t r a b a j a d o a l l f ? 35* C u ll es su t r a b a j o a l l f ? 36. Hay o t r a s p e rs o n a s a q u f en l a c a sa que t r a b a j a n ? Dlnde t r a b a j a n y q u l c l a s e de t r a b a j o hacen? P a r e n te s c o O c u p ac iln Companfa a. b . 37* S e r f a Ud. ta n am able de decirm e aproxim adam ente c u l n t o s son l o s i n g r e s o s m o n e ta r io s t o t a l e s de l a f a m i l i a p o r ano, e s d e c i r , cu an to gana? 38. Q u iere Ud. decirm e s i p e r t e n e c e a a lg u n a s o r g a n i - z a c io n e s , s o c ie d a d e s , o c lu b e s ? Va Ud. a c i e r t a i g l e s i a ? C u ll? P e r te n e c e Ud. a a lg u n a s o c ie d a d o c lu b de l a i g l e s i a ? 39- Es Ud. miembro de algiln s i n d i c a t o o uni<5n? a l g l n c lu b s o c i a l ? a lg u n a o r g a n i z a c i l n de v e te r a n o s u o r g a n i z a c i l n p o l f t i c a ? a lg u n a l o g i a ? a lg u n a o r g a n i z a c i l n c i v i c a ? a lg u n a o r g a n i z a c i l n o s o c ie d a d l a t i n o a m e r i c a n a o m exicana? a l g l n o t r o c lu b , s o c ie d a d , o r g a n i z a c i l n o a s o c i a c i l n ? 40. Q uiere Ud. decirm e c u l l e s su edad? 41. H asta q u l ano l l e g l Ud. en l a e s c u e l a ? 42. H a sta q u l ano lleg<5 su e s p o s a ( o ) en l a e s c u e la ? 351 43< D a t o s s o b r e l u g a r de n a c i m l e n t o , o c u p a c i( 5 n , c i u d a d a n f a , y fepha.. de e n t r a d a a l o s EE. UU L u g a r d e Ano P e r s o n a N a c i m l e n t o 0 c u p ac lc 3 n C l u d a d a n f a EE. S u j e t o P a d r e M ad re A b u e l o s ’ 1) 2 ) 3) 4 ) E s p o s a ( o ) S u e g r o S u e g r a A b u e l o s de l a e s p o s a (o d e l e s p o s o ) 1) 2) 3 ) 4 ) Entrc5 UU. APPENDIX C C L A SSIFIC A T IO N OF OCCUPATIONS U n s k il l e d L a b o re rs b a b y s i t t e r b r i c k l a y e r h e lp e r cook h e l p e r d is h w a s h e r d o m e s tic (housew ork) f o l d e r , h o s i e r y fo rem an , farm fo u n d ry l a b o r e r f r u i t p i c k e r g a r d e n e r g ro u n d s k e e p e r h a t c h e r y l a b o r e r hod c a r r i e r j a n i t o r k i l n u n l o a d e r l a b o r e r , n . e . c . l a b o r e r , c o n s t r u c t i o n l a b o r e r , farm , n . e . c . l a b o r e r , lum ber m i l l l a b o r e r , r a i l r o a d l o a d e r ( b o x c a r s ) m aintenancem an h e l p e r m u le te e r o i l e r o r d e r f i l l e r (w a reh o u se) p a c k e r (c a n n e r y ) p a rk a t t e n d a n t p e d d l e r p o u l t r y k i l l e r h e l p e r p o u l t r y w e ig h e r s h a r e c r o p p e r s t e n c i l e r s t o c k e r , i r o n t e a m s t e r t r a s h c o l l e c t o r t r e e p r im e r t r u c k d r i v e r h e l p e r t r u c k l o a d e r w a i t r e s s S e m i-S k i-lled Workers a s b e s t o s w orker a s s e m b le r , a i r c r a f t a s s e m b le r (sw iv e l p r o d u c t s ) a s s e m b le r , toy a s s e m b le r , t r a i l e r a u to s e r v i c e a t t e n d a n t b o x e r ( h o s i e r y ) b u t t o n h o l e maker c a n n e ry o p e r a t i v e c a r p e n t e r , a p p r e n t i c e c h e m ic a l m ix e r c o n c r e t e p o u r e r d ry c l e a n i n g o p e r a t i v e farm t e n a n t 352 f r u i t g r a d e r and p a c k e r furnacem an g a rm e n t m achine o p e r a t o r h o u s e k e e p e r i n s p e c t o r , s t e e l m e ta l f i l e r , g r i n d e r , p o l i s h e r m e ta l f i n i s h e r m ilk r o u t e man mine o p e r a t i v e and l a b o r e r n u rse ry m a n n u r s e 1s a id e p a i n t e r , a u to m o tiv e p a i n t e r , equipm ent 353 p a i r e r ( h o s i e r y ) p ip e l a y e r p s y c h i a t r i c t e c h n i c i a n s t o k e r s t r e e t sw eeper o p e r a t o r t i r e re p a irm a n t r a c t o r o p e r a t o r t r u c k d r i v e r v erm in e x t e r m i n a t o r w e a v e r, t e x t i l e w e ld e r w ire d raw ing m achine o p e r a t o r S k i l l e d a i r c r a f t i n s p e c t o r a u d i o v i s u a l t e c h n i c i a n , a s s i s t a n t a u to body re p a irm a n b e a u t i c i a n b l a c k s m i t h b o o k b in d e r b r i c k mason c a b in e tm a k e r c a r p e n t e r c a s t e r , p o t t e r y cem ent f i n i s h e r cement mason cook c o re m aker (f o u n d r y ) c ra n e o p e r a t o r fo rem an , la u n d ry fo rem a n , m e ta l p l a t i n g fo rem an , w a te rw o rk s Workers f o r m - s e t t e r , c o n c r e t e . i n s t a l l e r ( a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g ) la n d s c a p e g a rd e n e r , lo c o m o tiv e e n g i n e e r m a c h i n i s t m aintenancem an m ec h a n ic , a u to m o b ile m e c h a n ic , d i e s e l m e ta l m o ld e r m i l l w r i g h t n u r s e , v o c a t i o n a l p a i n t e r , c o n s t r u c t i o n p ip e f i t t e r roundhousem an s u p e r v i s o r , m a t e r i a l s d e p a rtm e n t t a i l o r t i l e s e t t e r t o o l m aker C l e r i c a l , S a l e s and T e c h n ic a l bank t e l l e r b o o k k e e p e r c a s h i e r c l e r k , drug s t o r e c l e r k , g r o c e r y c l e r k , o f f i c e c l e r k , p o s t o f f i c e c l e r k t y p i s t d r a f t s m a n , d e s ig n k e y p u n ch o p e r a t o r r e s e r v a t i o n a g e n t , a i r l i n e s e c r e t a r y s t e n o g r a p h e r s u r v e y crew c h i e f M anagers, O f f i c i a l s and P r o p r i e t o r s b a k e ry owner b a r ow ner b u y e r c o n t r a c t o r , b u i l d i n g farm owner g r o c e r m an a g er, a s s i s t a n t p o l i c e c o m m issio n e r r a d i o and t e l e v i s i o n s e r v i c e owner r e s t a u r a n t owner shoe r e p a i r s t o r e owner t o r t i l l a f a c t o r y owner u p h o l s t e r y shop owner P r o f e s s i o n a l a r c h i t e c t c o u n s e l o r , s c h o o l e n g i n e e r m i n i s t e r s o c i a l w o rk e r, m e d ic a l t e a c h e r B I B L I O G R A P H Y BIBLIOGRAPHY Books Adams, Emma H. To and P ro , Up and Down i n S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , Oregon and W ashington T e r r i t o r y . C i n c i n n a t i : C ra n s to n and Stowe, 1888. Armour, R ic h a rd W . Drug; S to r e D ays: My. Youth Among; th e P i l l s and P o t i o n s . New Y ork: M cG raw -H ill Book C o., 1959* B a rb e r, B e rn a rd . S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n j a C om parative A n a ly s is o f S t r u c t u r e and P r o c e s s . New Y o rk : H a r c o u rt, B race and C o ., 1957* B e a ls , R a lp h L. and Humphrey, Norman D. No F r o n t i e r to L e a rn in g ; th e M exican S tu d e n t i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s . M in n e a p o lis : U n i v e r s i t y o f M in n e so ta P r e s s , 1957- B o g ard u s, Emory S. The M exican i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s . Los A n g e le s: U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1934. __________ . S o c i a l D i s t a n c e . Los A n g e le s, 1959- B r a c k e t t , P ran k P. H i s t o r y o f Pomona V a lle y , C a l i f o r n i a , w ith B i o g r a p h i c a l S k e tc h e s o f t h e L ead ing Men -and Women o f t h e V a l l e y . Los A n g e le s : H i s t o r i c R ecord Company, 1920. Burma, John H. S p a n is h - S p e a k in g Groups i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s . Durham: Duke U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1954. Caplow, T h eo d o re. The S o c io lo g y o f Work. M in n e a p o lis : U n i v e r s i t y o f M in n e so ta P r e s s , 1954. 356 357 C a r ls s o n , G o s ta . S o c i a l M o b i l it y and C la ss S t r u c t u r e . Lund: C. W . K. G le e ru p , 1958. C e n te r s , R ic h a r d . The P sy ch o lo g y o f S o c i a l C l a s s e s : a Study o f C la s s C o n s c io u s n e s s . P r i n c e t o n : P r i n c e to n U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1949* C la r k , M a rg a r e t. H e a lth i n t h e M exican-A m erican C u l t u r e : a Community S tu d y . B e rk e le y : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s , 1959* C uber, John P. and K enkel, W illiam P. S o c ia l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n th e U n ite d S t a t e s . New York: A p p le to n - C e n tu ry C r o f t s , 1954. D r i s c o l l , Roy L . , ed . Pomona V a lle y Community Book. Pomona: A r th u r H. Cawston, 1950. Gamlo, M anuel. M exican Im m ig ra tio n t o th e U n ite d S t a t e s : a S tud y o f Human M ig r a tio n and A d ju s tm e n t. C h ic a g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f Chicago P r e s s , 1930. G a rn e r, B ess Adams. Windows i n an Old Adobe. Pomona: Pomona P r o g r e s s B u l l e t i n , 1939- G o ld sc h m id t, W a lte r. As You Sow. New York: H a r c o u r t, • B race and C o., 1947* G r i f f i t h , B e a t r i c e . American Me. B o sto n : Houghton M i f f l i n C o., 1948. K ahl, J o s e p h A. The American C la s s S t r u c t u r e . New Y ork: R i n e h a r t and C o., 1957- L e n s k i, G e rh a rd . The R e l i g i o u s F a c t o r . Garden C ity , New Y ork: D oubleday and C o ., 1961. L i p s e t , Seymour M a rtin and B end ix, R e in h a rd . S o c i a l M o b il i t y i n I n d u s t r i a l S o c i e t y . B e r k e le y : U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a . P r e s s , 1959- L u nd berg, G eorge A ., S h ra g , C la re n c e C ., and L a rs e n , O tto . S o c i o l o g y . Rev. e d . ; New York: H a rp er and B r o s . , 1958. 358 MeDonagh, Edward C. and R i c h a r d s , Eugene S. E th n ic R e la t i o n s i n t h e U n ite d S t a t e s . New York: A p p le to n - C e n tu r y - C r o f t s , 1953- M cW illiam s, C arey . F a c t o r i e s in t h e F i e l d : The S t o r y o f M ig r a to ry Farm L a b o r i n C a l i f o r n i a . B o sto n : L i t t l e , Brown, and C o., 1939* __________ . N o rth from M e x ic o : The S p a n is h -S p e a k in g P eople o f th e U n ite d S t a t e s . P h i l a d e l p h i a : J . B. L i p p i n c o t t Co., 194-9* t M anuel, H e rs c h e l T. The E d u c a tio n o f Mexican and S p a n is h - S p eak ing C h ild r e n i n T e x a s . A u s tin : Fund f o r R e s e a rc h i n th e S o c i a l S c i e n c e s , U n i v e r s i t y o f T ex as, 1930. Marden, C h a r le s F. M i n o r i t i e s in American S o c i e t y . New Y ork: American Book Company, 1952. __________ , and M eyer, G la d y s. M i n o r i t i e s i n Am erican S o c i e t y . Second e d i t i o n . New York: American Book Co. , 1962. P a r s o n s , T a l c o t t . The S o c i a l S y stem . G le n co e : F re e P r e s s , 1951* Rand C o r p o r a tio n . A M i l l i o n Random D i g i t s w ith 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 Normal D e v i a t e s . G le n c o e : F ree P r e s s , 1955- R e i s s , A l b e r t J . , J r . O c c u p a tio n s and S o c i a l S t a t u s . New York: The F re e P re ss o f G lencoe, 1961. ScEnchez, George I . The F o r g o t t e n • P e o p l e : A S tu d y o f New M e x ic a n s. A lb u q u e rq u e : U n i v e r s i t y o f New Mexico P r e s s , 1940. S a u n d e rs , L y le . C u l t u r a l D i f f e r e n c e and M ed ica l C a r e : The Case o f t h e S p a n ish Speaking People o f th e S o u th w e s t. New York: R u s s e l l Sage F o u n d a tio n , 1954. S c h e rm e rh o rn , R ic h a r d A. T hese Our People,• M i n o r i t i e s i n American C u l t u r e . B o sto n : D. C. H eath and C o ., 1949. 359 Sim pson, George E aton and Y in g e r, J . M ilto n . R a c i a l and C u l t u r a l M i n o r i t i e s : an A n a ly s is o f P r e j u d ic e and D i s c r i m i n a t i o n . New Y ork: H arp er and B r o s ., 1958. S o ro k in , P i t i r i m A. S o c ia l and C u l t u r a l M o b i l i t y . G le n co e: F re e P r e s s , 1959- T a l b e r t , R o b e rt H. Spanish-Name P eo p le i n th e S outhw est and West,- Socioeconom ic C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f White P e r sons o f S p a n ish Surname i n T ex as, A riz o n a , C a l i f o r n i a , C olorado and New M exico. F o r t W orth: Texas C h r i s t i a n U n i v e r s i t y , 1955- T a y lo r , P aul S c h u s te r . An A m erican-M exiean F r o n t i e r , Nueces County, T e x a s . C hapel H i l l : U n i v e r s i t y o f N o rth C a r o lin a P r e s s , 1934. Tuck, R uth D. Not w ith th e F i s t : Mexican Am ericans i n a S ou thw est C i t y . New York: H a rc o u rt, B race and C o., 1946. W arner, W . L loyd. American L i f e : Dream and R e a l i t y . C h ica g o : U n i v e r s i t y o f C hicago P r e s s , 1953- __________ , and L unt, Paul S. The S o c i a l L if e o f a Modern Community. New Haven: Yale U n i v e r s i t y . P r e s s , 1941. __________ , M eeker, M archia, and E e l l s , K enneth. S o c ia l C la s s i n A m erica. New York: H arper and B ro s ., I960. A r t i c l e s and P e r i o d i c a l s A ltu s , W illiam D. "The American M exican: The S u r v iv a l o f a C u l t u r e ," J o u r n a l o f S o c i a l P s y c h o lo g y , XXIX (May, 1 9 4 9 ), 211-20. A nderson, C. A rn old. "A S k e p t i c a l Note on t h e R e l a t i o n o f V e r t i c a l M o b ility to E d u c a ti o n ," American J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , LXVI (May, 1 9 6 1 ), 5 6O-7 O. 3 6 0 B a r k e r , George C. " S o c i a l F u n c tio n s o f Language i n a M exican-A m erican Community," Acta A m ericana, V ( J u l y , 1 9 4 7 ), 1 85 -2 0 2 . B e a l s , R a lp h L. " C u ltu r e P a t t e r n s o f M exican-A m erican L i f e , " i n P r o c e e d in g s , F i f t h Annual C o n f e re n c e , S o u th w est C o u n c il on t h e E d u c a tio n o f S p a n is h - S peak in g P e o p l e . Los A n g e les, 1951, PP* 5-13* B o g a rd u s, Emory S. "Second G e n e r a tio n M e x ic a n s," S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a r c h , X I I I ( J a n u a r y - F e b r u a ry , 1 9 2 9 ), 2 7 6- 8 3 . Broom, L eo n ard . " S o c i a l D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n and S t r a t i f i c a t i o n , " i n R o b e rt K. M erton, L eonard Broom, and L eo nard S. C o t t r e l l , J r . , e d s . , S o c io lo g y T o d a y : Problem s and P r o s p e c t s . New York: B a s ic Books, 1959, pp . 4 2 9 -4 1 . __________ , and Shevky, E s h r e f . "M exicans i n t h e U n ite d S t a t e s : A Problem i n S o c i a l D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n , " S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a rc h , XXXVI (J a n u a r y - F e b ru a ry , 1 9 5 2 ), 1 5 0- 5 8 . Burma, John H. " R e se a rc h Note on th e M easurem ent o f I n t e r r a c i a l M a r r ia g e ," Am erican J o u r n a l o f S o c i o l o g y , LVI (May, 1 9 5 2 ), 5 8 7 -8 9 . C e n t e r s , R ic h a r d . "Towards an A r t i c u l a t i o n o f Two A pproaches to S o c i a l C la s s Phenom ena," I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f O p inio n and A t t i t u d e R e s e a r c h , IV (W in te r, 1 9 5 0 ), 4 9 9 - 5 1 4 . G o ld sc h m id t, W a lte r . " S o c i a l C la s s and th e Dynamics o f S t a t u s i n A m e ric a," Am erican A n t h r o p o l o g i s t , LVII (December, 1 9 5 5 ), 1209-17- H a l l , J . R. and G la s s , D. V. " E d u c a tio n and S o c i a l M o b il i t y , " i n D. V. G la s s , e d . , S o c i a l M o b i l it y i n B r i t a i n . London: R o u tle d g e and Kegan P a u l, 1954, pp. 291-307. Humphrey, Norman Daymond. "The Changing S t r u c t u r e o f th e D e t r o i t M exican F a m ily : An In d e x o f A c c u l t u r a t i o n ," A m erican S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , IX (December, 1 9 4 4 ), 3 6 1 6 2 2 - 2 6 . Humphrey, Nonman Daymond. "The G e n e ric F o lk C u ltu r e o f M ex ico ," R u r a l S o c io lo g y , V I I I (December, 1 9 4 3 ), 364-77- __________ . "The S t e r e o t y p e and t h e S o c i a l Types o f M exican- American Y o u th s ," J o u r n a l o f S o c i a l P s y c h o lo g y , XXII (A ugust, 1 9 4 5 ), 6 9 -7 8 . Hyman, H e r b e r t H. "The V alue System s o f D i f f e r e n t C l a s s e s : A S o c i a l P s y c h o l o g i c a l C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e A n aly s i s o f S t r a t i f i c a t i o n , " i n R e in h a r d B endix and Seymour M a r tin L i p s e t , e d s . , C la s s , S t a t u s and Power: A R e a d e r i n S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n . G le n co e : F re e P r e s s , 1953, PP- 4 2 6 -4 2 . K ahl, J o s e p h A. and D a v is, James A. "A C om parison o f In d e x e s o f Socio-E conom ic S t a t u s , " American S o c i o l o g i c a l Review, XX (Ju n e , 1 9 5 5 ), 3 1 7-25 . K luckhohn, F l o r e n c e Roekwood. " C u l t u r a l F a c to r s i n S o c i a l Work P r a c t i c e and E d u c a t i o n , " S o c i a l S e r v ic e R ev ie w , XXV (March, 195 1 ), 40-45- L a n d e c k e r, W erner S. " C la s s B o u n d a r i e s , " American S o c io l o g i c a l . Review, XXV (December, i 9 6 0 ), 868-77* L a s s w e ll, Thomas E. " O r i e n t a t i o n s Toward S o c i a l C l a s s e s , " Am erican J o u r n a l o f S o c i o lo g y , LXV (May, i 9 6 0 ), 5 8 5 -8 7 . . " R e p l y ," Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , XX (F e b ru a ry , 1 9 5 5 ), 80-83- __________ . "A S tudy o f S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n Using an Area Sample o f R a t e r s , " Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l Review, XIX (Ju n e , 1 9 5 4 ), 310-13- Lawson, Edwin D. and Boek, W a lte r E. " C o r r e l a t i o n s o f In d e x e s o f F a m i l i e s ' S ocio-E conom ic S t a t u s , " S o c i a l F o r c e s , XXXIX (December, i 9 6 0 ), 1 4 9 -5 2 . 3 6 2 L e n s k i, G e rh a rd . " S o c i a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n and S t a t u s C r y s t a l l i z a t i o n , " Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l R eview , XXI (A ugust, 1 9 5 6 ), 4 5 6 -6 4 . __________ and L e g g e tt , John C. " C a s te , C la s s and D e fe re n c e i n th e R e s e a r c h I n t e r v i e w , " A m erican J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , LXV (March, i 9 6 0 ), 463-67* Loeb, M a rtin B. " i m p l i c a t i o n s o f S t a t u s D i f f e r e n t i a t i o n f o r P e r s o n a l and S o c i a l D e v elo p m en t," H arv ard E d u c a t i o n a l R eview , X X III (Summer, 1 9 5 3 ), 1 6 8 -7 4 . McDonagh, Edward C. " S t a t u s L e v e ls o f M e x ic a n s ,1 1 S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a r c h , XXXIII ( J u l y - A ugu st, 1 9 4 9 ), 449-59* N e lso n , H a ro ld A. and L a s s w e ll, Thomas E. " S t a t u s I n d i c e s , S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n and S o c i a l C l a s s , " S o c io lo g y and S o c i a l R e s e a rc h , XLIV (J u l y - A u g u s t , i 9 6 0 ), 410- 13* P a r s o n s , T a l c o t t . "A R e v is e d A n a l y t i c a l Approach to th e T heory o f S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n , " i n R e in h a rd B en d ix and Seymour M a rtin L i p s e t , e d s . , C l a s s , S t a t u s and Power: A R e ad e r i n S o c i a l S t r a t i f i c a t i o n . G le n c o e : F re e P r e s s , 1953, PP* 9 2 -1 2 8 . S a r g e n t, S. S t a n s f e l d . " C la s s and C l a s s - C o n s c io u s n e s s In a C a l i f o r n i a Town," S o c i a l P ro b le m s , I (Ju n e , 1 9 5 3 ), 22-27* Schatzrnan, L eonard and S t r a u s s , Anselm. " S o c i a l C la s s and Modes o f C om m unication," Am erican J o u r n a l o f S o c io lo g y , LX ( J a n u a r y , 1 9 5 5 ), 3 2 9-38 . Sim pson, George E. and Y in g e r, J . M ilto n . "The S o c io lo g y o f Race and E th n ic R e l a t i o n s , " i n R o b e rt K. M erton, L eo n a rd Broom, and L eo n ard S. C o t t r e l l , J r . , e d s . , S o c io lo g y Today: Problem s and P r o s p e c t s . New Y ork: B a s ic Books, 1959, PP* 376-99* S p i r o , M e lfo rd E. "The A c c u l t u r a t i o n o f Am erican E th n ic G ro u p s ," Am erican A n t h r o p o l o g i s t , LVII (December, 1 9 5 5 ), 1 2 4 0 -5 2 . 363 W atson, James B. and Samora, J u l i a n . " S u b o rd in a te L e a d e r s h ip i n a B i c u l t u r a l Community: An A n aly s i s , " Am erican S o c i o l o g i c a l Review , XIX (A ugust, 1 9 5 4 ), 413-21. W illia m s , Robin M., J r . " R a c ia l and C u l t u r a l R e l a t i o n s , " i n J o s e p h B. G i t t l e r , e d . , Review o f S o c io lo g y ; A n a ly s is o f a D ecad e. New Y ork: John Wiley and Sons, 1957* PP- 4 2 3-64 . W innie, W illiam W., J r . "The S p a n ish Surname C r i t e r i o n f o r I d e n t i f y i n g H isp an o s i n th e S o u th w e s te rn U n ited S t a t e s : A P r e l i m i n a r y E v a l u a t i o n , " S o c i a l F o r c e s , • XXXVIII (May, 1960J, 3 6 3- 6 6 . R e p o rts and P am ph lets A sh ley , Thomas J;. A R e p o rt t o th e C o u n c il o f th e C ity o f Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a on th e Q u a l it y o f Housing i n th e C i ty o f Pomona; a Survey C onducted Between June and Septem ber 1 9 6 1 . Pomona, 1961. B e a s le y , T. D. P i c tu r e s q u e Pomona: A B r i e f D e s c r i p t i o n o f th e N a t u r a l A d v a n tag e s, C lim a te a n d P r o d u c ts o f Pomona, Los A ngeles C o., C a l . New Y ork: Photo E n g ra v in g C o., 1887- Cox, A r th u r H. Youth i n Pomona: A R e p o rt from th e Mayor o f Pomona to th e G overnor o f th e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , Pomona, 1959- Edw ards, Alba M. C om parative O c c u p a tio n a l S t a t i s t i c s f o r th e U n ite d S t a t e s , 1 8 7 0 -1 9 4 0 . W ashin gto n, D. C . : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1943- G a rn e r, B ess Adams and P o s t, Miriam C o lc o rd . The S to r y o f th e Adobe de P alo m ares i n Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a . C la re m o n t, C a l i f o r n i a : S au n d ers P r e s s , 1940. Pomona C i ty P la n n in g Commission. F a c ts About Pomona. R e s e a rc h A n a ly s is , 1 9 5 5 - Pomona: C i ty P la n n in g Com mission, 1955- 364 Pomona C ity P u b lic S c h o o ls. F i r s t Annual R e p o r t . Pomona: D a ily Times P r i n t i n g House, 1891* Pomona F i r e D epartm ent S o u v e n ir . Pomona: P u b lis h e d i n th e I n t e r e s t o f th e R e l i e f Fund o f th e Pomona F i r e D e p t., 1903* R obinson, W . W . Panorama: A P i c t u r e H i s t o r y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a . Los A n g e les: T i t l e In s u r a n c e and T r u s t C o., 1953* U. S. Bureau o f th e C ensus. Common S p a n ish S u rn am es. (Vol. IV, P t. I l l , G e n era l Coding, A ttachm ent H). N . p . , n .d . _______ . P e rso n s o f S p a n ish Surname (U. S. Census o f P o p u la tio n : 1950. V ol. IV, S p e c ia l R e p o r ts , P t. 3, Chap. C). W ashington, D. C . : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 1953* _____. U. S. C ensuses o f P o p u la tio n and H ou sing : I 9 6 0 . Census T r a c t s . Los A ngeles-Long Beach, C a l i f . S ta n d a rd M e tr o p o li t a n S t a t i s t i c a l A re a . W ashing to n , D. C. : Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , 19.62. T heses B eard, E. A lic e . "A Study o f th e Mexican P u p ils i n t h e Frem ont J u n i o r High S ch o o l, Pomona, C a l i f o r n i a , 1 9 4 0 -4 1 ." U n pu b lish ed M a s t e r ’ s t h e s i s , C larem o n t C o lle g e s , 1941. i D eal, G e ra ld V. "A Study o f th e V o c a tio n a l O p p o r t u n i t i e s in Pomona V a lle y f o r M exican-A m ericans ; a S tu d y in C o u n s e lin g ." U npu b lish ed M a s t e r 's t h e s i s , C larem ont G ra d u ate S c h o o l, 1951* Lehman, V i c to r Boyd. "A Study o f th e S o c ia l A djustm en t o f th e M exican-A m ericans In Chino and a Propo sed P lan o f Community A ctio n u n d e r School L e a d e r s h i p ." U n pu b lish ed M a s t e r 's t h e s i s , C larem ont G ra d u a te S c h o o l, 1947* 365 L a s s w e ll,. Thomas E. " S t a t u s S t r a t i f i c a t i o n i n a S e l e c t e d Community." U n p u b lish e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , 1953« R o g e rs, R o b e rt B. " P e r c e p t i o n o f t h e Power S t r u c t u r e by S o c i a l C la s s i n a C a l i f o r n i a Community." U n p u b lish e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u th e rn C a l i f o r n i a , 1962. Simmons, O z zie . "A m ericans and M exican-A m erican s i n South T ex a s: A S tu d y i n D o m in a n t-S u b o rd in a te Group R e l a t i o n s . " U n p u b lish e d Ph.D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , H a rv ard U n i v e r s i t y , 1952.
Linked assets
University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses
Conceptually similar
PDF
Social Factors Related To Dentistry As A Career
PDF
A Critique Of The Concept Ethnocentrism As Set Forth In Selected Social Science Literature
PDF
Group Factors And Individual Internalization Of A Value
PDF
Perception Of The Power Structure By Social Class In A California Community
PDF
The Major League Professional Baseball Player: A Sociological Study
PDF
Some Social Factors Affecting The Power Structure And Status Of A Professional Association In Reference To Social Work
PDF
Familism, Suburbanization, And Residential Mobility In A Metropolis
PDF
An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Of Vertical Occupational Mobility And Horizontal Residential Mobility
PDF
Social Class Membership And Ethnic Prejudice In Cedar City
PDF
The Selfish Self: A Social Psychological Study Of Social Character
PDF
Interpersonal Relations In Ethnically Mixed Small Work Groups
PDF
Social Stratification In A Selected Community
PDF
Middle-Class Marital Roles - Ideal And Perceived In Relation To Adjustment In Marriage
PDF
The Career Business Executive As A Definitive Occupational Type
PDF
Reference Group Theory, Selection, And The Images Of Professions
PDF
Normative values of selected law enforcement officers and adult male offenders
PDF
Alienation, Structural Strain, And Political Deviancy: A Test Of Merton'Shypothesis
PDF
A Study Of Delinquency Among Urban Mexican-American Youth
PDF
A Study Of Relationships Between Occupational And Marital Roles And Marital Adjustment
PDF
Consensus Of Role Perceptions In A Welfare Planning Council
Asset Metadata
Creator
Penalosa, Fernando
(author)
Core Title
Class Consciousness And Social Mobility In A Mexican-American Community
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree Program
Sociology
Publisher
University of Southern California
(original),
University of Southern California. Libraries
(digital)
Tag
OAI-PMH Harvest,Sociology, general
Language
English
Contributor
Digitized by ProQuest
(provenance)
Advisor
McDonagh, Edward C. (
committee chair
), Lasswell, Thomas E. (
committee member
), Weckler, Joseph E. (
committee member
)
Permanent Link (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.25549/usctheses-c18-303649
Unique identifier
UC11358805
Identifier
6402598.pdf (filename),usctheses-c18-303649 (legacy record id)
Legacy Identifier
6402598.pdf
Dmrecord
303649
Document Type
Dissertation
Rights
Penalosa, Fernando
Type
texts
Source
University of Southern California
(contributing entity),
University of Southern California Dissertations and Theses
(collection)
Access Conditions
The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the au...
Repository Name
University of Southern California Digital Library
Repository Location
USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA