Page 33 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 33 of 68 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
COLLABORATION ACROSS SYSTEMS
28
Method of Assessment of Impact
There are several monitoring efforts in place concerning CAS. CAS – Stat will be a monthly meeting for all stakeholders to meet and review monthly process and outcomes objectives. Specifically, CAS will monitor the following: # of batterers received services; # of batterers successfully completed services, # of batterers unsuccessfully complete services, # of new batterers receiving CAS services budget reviews and expenses. Weekly Individual Supervision will be in place so that team members will receive feedback on their efforts. Both strengths and opportunities will be highlighted on a CAS standardized supervision template (See Appendix G). Bi-weekly Team Meetings will allow all staff members to receive training, discuss lessons learned and success stories among one another. The Quarterly Team Meetings will be reserved for CAS staff members to receive instruction from experts about issues identified through CAS standardized supervisions (See Appendix G). The 90-Day Facilitated Engagement Meetings will be in place to allow the first time batterer to see their progress about their participation in CAS. Lastly, the role of the third-party evaluator will synthesize all data and produce an annual report for staff members and dignitaries to review.
EPIS – Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, & Sustainment
According to Moullin, Dickson, Stadnick, Rabin, and Aarons (2019), the exploration phase starts when implementers and relevant stakeholders become aware of specific needs and contemplate methods to address them. The exploration phase features two tasks. These tasks are: (1) secure support from Arapahoe County Commissioners, and (2) execute a memorandum of understandings between all participating agencies. This phase happens from June 2020 – December 2020 (See Appendix F).
Object Description
| Title | Collaboration across systems: a program design to address the reoccurrence of domestic violence |
| Author | Lester, Jason Hiram |
| Author email | JHLESTER@USC.EDU;JHLESTER@USC.EDU |
| Degree | Doctor of Social Work |
| Document type | Capstone project |
| Degree program | Social Work |
| School | Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work |
| Date defended/completed | 2020-04-17 |
| Date submitted | 2020-08-11 |
| Date approved | 2020-08-11 |
| Restricted until | 2020-08-11 |
| Date published | 2020-08-11 |
| Advisor (committee member) | Blonshine, Rebekah |
| Abstract | There is a problem with reoccurring domestic violence among batterers, and several systems are working to address the issue; however, these efforts are usually in a siloed fashion. Within the context of the stopping family violence Grand Challenge for Social Work, there have not been reasonable all-inclusive solutions. The size, scope, and social significance of the problem is significant, based on the fact that approximately 1600 women in the United States of America die due to reoccurring domestic violence. On average, either a current or past partner murders two women each week (Cerise, 2011). ❧ This capstone proposal will utilize the collaboration across systems framework to address the reoccurrence of domestic violence. It is designed to address critical issues of the day-to-day practice of stakeholders from various systems working together from the initial 911 call to successful case closure. The proposal represents an innovative way to address the problem of reoccurring domestic violence and stakeholders working in silos due to its request for regular services wrapped around domestic violence batterers. Based on evidence and logic developed from several existing stakeholder efforts abroad, the capstone will produce successful joint efforts of various stakeholders. While small to start due to this innovation pilot in Arapahoe County, Colorado, the long-term vision of the project is primarily due to the endless possibilities of its replication worldwide. |
| Keyword | domestic violence; Grand Challenge; end family violence; program design |
| Language | English |
| Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
| Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
| Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
| Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
| Type | texts |
| Legacy record ID | usctheses-m |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Rights | Lester, Jason Hiram |
| Physical access | The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the author, as the original true and official version of the work, but does not grant the reader permission to use the work if the desired use is covered by copyright. It is the author, as rights holder, who must provide use permission if such use is covered by copyright. The original signature page accompanying the original submission of the work to the USC Libraries is retained by the USC Libraries and a copy of it may be obtained by authorized requesters contacting the repository e-mail address given. |
| Repository name | University of Southern California Digital Library |
| Repository address | USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus MC 7002, 106 University Village, Los Angeles, California 90089-7002, USA |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Filename | etd-LesterJaso-8919.pdf |
| Archival file | Volume13/etd-LesterJaso-8919.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 33 |
| Full text | COLLABORATION ACROSS SYSTEMS 28 Method of Assessment of Impact There are several monitoring efforts in place concerning CAS. CAS – Stat will be a monthly meeting for all stakeholders to meet and review monthly process and outcomes objectives. Specifically, CAS will monitor the following: # of batterers received services; # of batterers successfully completed services, # of batterers unsuccessfully complete services, # of new batterers receiving CAS services budget reviews and expenses. Weekly Individual Supervision will be in place so that team members will receive feedback on their efforts. Both strengths and opportunities will be highlighted on a CAS standardized supervision template (See Appendix G). Bi-weekly Team Meetings will allow all staff members to receive training, discuss lessons learned and success stories among one another. The Quarterly Team Meetings will be reserved for CAS staff members to receive instruction from experts about issues identified through CAS standardized supervisions (See Appendix G). The 90-Day Facilitated Engagement Meetings will be in place to allow the first time batterer to see their progress about their participation in CAS. Lastly, the role of the third-party evaluator will synthesize all data and produce an annual report for staff members and dignitaries to review. EPIS – Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, & Sustainment According to Moullin, Dickson, Stadnick, Rabin, and Aarons (2019), the exploration phase starts when implementers and relevant stakeholders become aware of specific needs and contemplate methods to address them. The exploration phase features two tasks. These tasks are: (1) secure support from Arapahoe County Commissioners, and (2) execute a memorandum of understandings between all participating agencies. This phase happens from June 2020 – December 2020 (See Appendix F). |
