Page 57 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 57 of 162 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
SUBVERTING STATE VIOLENCE 46 and acknowledges that the politics surrounding the identities are often catalysts for larger issues. This lens of intersectionality abandons the “additive-binary-zero-sum calculus” that often reduces individuals to assessments of privileges, as opposed to disadvantages (Hancock, 2012). The relationship of Black and Latinx existence to power is an important part of the study and paradigm intersectionality will aid in a thorough analysis of these dynamics. Paradigm intersectionality incorporates a five-prong approach to analysis. The prongs are Categorical Multiplicity, Categorical Intersection, Time Dynamics, Diversity Within, and Individual-Institutional Relations (Hancock, 2011). Categorical multiplicity acknowledges that race, gender, class, and sexual orientation are identities that shape each individual life in this society and can represent various threats to systems of power. Categorical Intersection recognizes how the categorical multiplicity of an individual results in different experiences of oppression within systems of power. Time Dynamics refers to the notion that privileged group membership is fluid and has changed throughout history. It recognizes that minoritized groups have made progress throughout history. This challenges the defiant ignorance of groups who do not acknowledge that progress has occurred and of groups with power who do not acknowledge that some progress is enough or complete (Hancock, 2011). Diversity Within deals with intersecting categories produce subgroups and different political agendas, and therefore further exposes power relationships and structures in American politics. Lastly, individual-institutional interactions positions race, gender, class, and sexual orientation as constructs carried out at individual, group, and institutional/systemic levels. This comprehensive framework entails a vast scope of individual existence within systems represented in Figure A (Hancock, 2011). Paradigm Intersectionality provides an analysis of the critical consciousness development and political efficacy of Black and Latinx youth that is holistic and pushes beyond interpersonal dynamics.
Object Description
Title | Subverting state violence through the art of hood politics: an exploratory study of Black and Latinx students' critical consciousness and political efficacy |
Author | Rodgers, Kenneth W., Jr. |
Author email | kwrodger@usc.edu;kenneth.rodgersjr@gmail.com |
Degree | Doctor of Education |
Document type | Dissertation |
Degree program | Educational Leadership |
School | Rossier School of Education |
Date defended/completed | 2020-06-25 |
Date submitted | 2020-08-07 |
Date approved | 2020-08-08 |
Restricted until | 2020-08-08 |
Date published | 2020-08-08 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Davis, Charles H.F., III |
Advisor (committee member) |
Hancock Alfaro, Ange-Marie Green, Alan |
Abstract | This qualitative study examines the experiences of Black and Latinx youth, the relationship between their critical consciousness development and political efficacy, and their continual subversion of state violence. The academic literature has predominately focused on critical consciousness solely as theorized by Freire and is often interpreted through neoliberal entities and paradigms, thereby minimizing its socialist, anti-colonial, anti-capitalist theoretical origin. The literature has also gauged political efficacy primarily through traditional metrics of civic engagement and voting that do not traditionally account for varying displays of organizing, activism, intentional non-voting, and other forms of resistance. The study investigated systems of power that converge to shape formal and informal educational experiences of the participants and capture the ways that they developed their critical consciousness and political attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs. As a result of 8 in-depth interviews and analyses of Black and Latinx youth (ages 17-19), snapshots emerged that allowed participants to foreground their experiences and construct meaning making of their worldviews. The findings of the study reveal the complex nature of critical consciousness development for Black and Latinx youth and serve as a model for utilizing critical consciousness and political efficacy as essential frameworks for future study and analyses. The findings add to the limited literature on the experiences of Black and Latinx youth concerning the system of education and its relation to critical consciousness development, political identity formation, and political efficacy. This study aimed to amplify the voices of Black and Latinx youth in a manner that acknowledges their humanity and agency. |
Keyword | politics; political; political efficacy; efficacy; resistance; protest; hood; subvert; subverting; subversion; resist; state violence; state; Black; Latinx; socialist; anti-capitalist; anti-Blackness; communism; Marxism; decolonial; decolonization; critical consciousness; racism; white supremacy; gender; patriarchy; religion; anti-colonial; anti-capitalist; Freire, Paulo Freire; Frantz Fanon; Fred Moten; Karl Marx; Saidiya Hartman; education; schools; youth; exploratory; intersectionality; Crenshaw; Kimberle Crenshaw; Collins; James Baldwin; Gloria Anzaldua; whiteness; civics; civic engagement; neoliberalism; democracy; social justice; domination; power; gender; curriculum; walk-out; sit-in; paradigm intersectionality; BlackCrit; critical race theory, Henry Giroux; Kendrick Lamar; Wardell Milam |
Language | English |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Rodgers, Kenneth W., Jr. |
Physical access | The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the author, as the original true and official version of the work, but does not grant the reader permission to use the work if the desired use is covered by copyright. It is the author, as rights holder, who must provide use permission if such use is covered by copyright. The original signature page accompanying the original submission of the work to the USC Libraries is retained by the USC Libraries and a copy of it may be obtained by authorized requesters contacting the repository e-mail address given. |
Repository name | University of Southern California Digital Library |
Repository address | USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus MC 7002, 106 University Village, Los Angeles, California 90089-7002, USA |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | etd-RodgersKen-8903.pdf |
Archival file | Volume13/etd-RodgersKen-8903.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 57 |
Full text | SUBVERTING STATE VIOLENCE 46 and acknowledges that the politics surrounding the identities are often catalysts for larger issues. This lens of intersectionality abandons the “additive-binary-zero-sum calculus” that often reduces individuals to assessments of privileges, as opposed to disadvantages (Hancock, 2012). The relationship of Black and Latinx existence to power is an important part of the study and paradigm intersectionality will aid in a thorough analysis of these dynamics. Paradigm intersectionality incorporates a five-prong approach to analysis. The prongs are Categorical Multiplicity, Categorical Intersection, Time Dynamics, Diversity Within, and Individual-Institutional Relations (Hancock, 2011). Categorical multiplicity acknowledges that race, gender, class, and sexual orientation are identities that shape each individual life in this society and can represent various threats to systems of power. Categorical Intersection recognizes how the categorical multiplicity of an individual results in different experiences of oppression within systems of power. Time Dynamics refers to the notion that privileged group membership is fluid and has changed throughout history. It recognizes that minoritized groups have made progress throughout history. This challenges the defiant ignorance of groups who do not acknowledge that progress has occurred and of groups with power who do not acknowledge that some progress is enough or complete (Hancock, 2011). Diversity Within deals with intersecting categories produce subgroups and different political agendas, and therefore further exposes power relationships and structures in American politics. Lastly, individual-institutional interactions positions race, gender, class, and sexual orientation as constructs carried out at individual, group, and institutional/systemic levels. This comprehensive framework entails a vast scope of individual existence within systems represented in Figure A (Hancock, 2011). Paradigm Intersectionality provides an analysis of the critical consciousness development and political efficacy of Black and Latinx youth that is holistic and pushes beyond interpersonal dynamics. |