Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 35 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 35 of 141 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
New York v. U.S. Department
of Commerce
Our challenge to the federal
defendants' refusal to undertake a post-enumeration
survey to correct the traditional undercount of o.span-
ics resulted in a settlement
requiring the issuance of
technical guidelines favoring
a post-enumeration survey
and adjustment.
Ridge v. Verity
In our amicus defense of this
lawsuit, brought by nativist
plaintiffs to challenge the
Census Bureau's inclusion
of undocumented persons
within the 1990 decennial
census, the federal court
dismissed the case.
Sanchez v. Bond
Following our loss in the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit in'this case challenging
discriminatory at-large
elections, we filed a petition
for certiorari seeking review by
the Supreme Court. No action
has yet been taken.
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS
E/ Rescate v. Executive Office
for Immigration Review
Agreeing with our contentions
in this class action challenge
to the Immigration and
Naturalization Service's policy
of not translating for limited-
English-proficient individuals
all portions of exclusion and
deportation proceedings, the
federal trial court vehemently
denied the government's
motion to dismiss
International Molders'
Union v. Nelson
Following a three-month trial
of our side of the case in this
Fourh Amendment challenge
to ■ 'K place raids and
abuses by the Immigration
and Naturalization Service
(INS), the federal court in an
extensive and graphic opinion
denied the government's
motion for a directed verdict.
Spanish Speaking Unity
Council v. Oakland
After our challenge on
numerous state law grounds
to the building of a large
detention center in Oakland
by the Immigration and
Naturalization Service 1INS1
the INS abandoned its
building efforts
United Suites v. New El Rey
Sausage Co.
When the Administrative Law
ludge (ALI) in this case
rejected our arguments that
the so-called "educational
and "compliance visits by
agents from the Immigration
and Naturalization Service
(INS) violated statutory
guidelines in the Immigration
Reform and Control Ac: of
1986 (IRCAi, we supported as
amicus in the Ninth Circuit
the employers appeal
contending that the employer-
sanctions fines under IRCA
had been imposed illegally
■;S
lulia Flores, 50. from East Los Angeles Bird In a Tree
Object Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD |
| Description | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD: ❧ Section 1: Statement of Stewart Kwoh, executive director of Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California (APALC) ❧ Section 2: Testimony of Vibiana Andrade, regional counsel of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) ❧ Section 2: Exhibit A - letter - from: Antonia Hernandez, MALDEF president and general counsel ❧ Section 2: Exhibit B - MALDEF Annual Report, 1989-90 ❧ Section 3: Summary of testimony of R. Samuel Paz on behalf of the Mexican American Bar Association of the LA County ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Lt. William D. Hall) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 2 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Det. Jerry L. Mount) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 3 - Investigation of officer-involved shootings ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 4 - R. Samuel Paz - resume ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 5 - Newspaper Clippings ❧ Section 4: Testimony of Citizens in Support of the Chief of Police (CISCOP) ❧ Section 5: Summary of testimony of Roger Coggan, esq., director, legal services department, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center ❧ Section 5: attachment 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Mitchels Grobeson, et al. v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Kenneth G. Bickman) ❧ Section 5: attachment 2 - letter - from: Roger Coggan, director, legal services, LA Gay and Lesbian Community; to: Ira Reiner, LA County district attorney, and James Hahn, LA city attorney ❧ Section 5: attachment 3 - Article - "How bad are relations between gays and the LAPD?" ❧ Section 5: attachment 4 - "Declaration of Thomas J. Coleman, Jr." ❧ Section 5: attachment 5 - "Testimony of Christopher Commission" ❧ Section 6: "Report to Independent Commission" by Louis A. Custrini, vice-president-communications, Merchants and Manufacturers Association ❧ Index. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
| Coverage date | 1991-05-01 |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
| Date created | 1991-05-01 |
| Type | texts |
| Format | 141 p. |
| Format (aat) | presentations (communicative events) |
| Format (imt) | application/pdf |
| Language | English |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
| Series | Independent Commission File List |
| File | Public Sessions |
| Box and folder | box 24, folder 25, item 1 |
| Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
| Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
| Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
| Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Filename | indep-box24-25-01 |
Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 35 |
| Format (imt) | image/tiff |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Full text | New York v. U.S. Department of Commerce Our challenge to the federal defendants' refusal to undertake a post-enumeration survey to correct the traditional undercount of o.span- ics resulted in a settlement requiring the issuance of technical guidelines favoring a post-enumeration survey and adjustment. Ridge v. Verity In our amicus defense of this lawsuit, brought by nativist plaintiffs to challenge the Census Bureau's inclusion of undocumented persons within the 1990 decennial census, the federal court dismissed the case. Sanchez v. Bond Following our loss in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in'this case challenging discriminatory at-large elections, we filed a petition for certiorari seeking review by the Supreme Court. No action has yet been taken. IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS E/ Rescate v. Executive Office for Immigration Review Agreeing with our contentions in this class action challenge to the Immigration and Naturalization Service's policy of not translating for limited- English-proficient individuals all portions of exclusion and deportation proceedings, the federal trial court vehemently denied the government's motion to dismiss International Molders' Union v. Nelson Following a three-month trial of our side of the case in this Fourh Amendment challenge to ■ 'K place raids and abuses by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), the federal court in an extensive and graphic opinion denied the government's motion for a directed verdict. Spanish Speaking Unity Council v. Oakland After our challenge on numerous state law grounds to the building of a large detention center in Oakland by the Immigration and Naturalization Service 1INS1 the INS abandoned its building efforts United Suites v. New El Rey Sausage Co. When the Administrative Law ludge (ALI) in this case rejected our arguments that the so-called "educational and "compliance visits by agents from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) violated statutory guidelines in the Immigration Reform and Control Ac: of 1986 (IRCAi, we supported as amicus in the Ninth Circuit the employers appeal contending that the employer- sanctions fines under IRCA had been imposed illegally ■;S lulia Flores, 50. from East Los Angeles Bird In a Tree |
| Filename | indep-box24-25-05~08.tif |
| Archival file | Volume81/indep-box24-25-05~08.tif |
