Richardson & Varanini FTO interview 001, 1991-06-19 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 32 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
• • • • • TO: PROM: DATE: RE: KIRKLAND & ELLIS MEMORANDUM HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE The Christopher Commission, Louise LaMothe, Julie Huffman Tony L. Richardson and ~ Emilio Varanini June 19, 1991 Interview of Field Training Officer 001 I. PERSONAL BACKGROUND We interviewed Field Training Officer 001 ("Officer 001") on June 12, 1991. She hite female. Officer 001 is a high school graduate who has studied liberal arts courses in college, earning forty units toward graduation. She has lived in the Los Angeles area for fifteen years. Prior to becoming a police officer, Officer 001 held various office jobs, A strong desire for job stability and greater career options lead her to the LAPD. She had no grandiose ideas about police work, but she did describe herself as a compassionate and caring person. She avoided the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department because it had a reputation of being a "redneck organization." In response to our questions concerning why she • volunteered to be interviewed by the Christopher Commission, . ... HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Officer 001 stated that the LAPD neither actively encouraged nor discouraged her from being interviewed. She does not recall any discussion at roll call, for example, in which her superiors urged officers to cooperate with the Commission. In fact, the majority of LAPD officers views the Commission as a nuisance and feel that the King affair has been exploited by the media. When she received a form letter from Chief Gates concerning these interviews, she decided she would participate. Officer 001 fears reprisals from her colleagues if her candid statements to the Commission were publicized. We assured her that the Commission would f. trea~ her stateme11ts · in ·~ ighly ... .. confidential manner -- that for all intents and purposes her remarks will be anonymous. Upon receiving this assurance, she stated that she would speak openly and would even testify before the Commission behind closed doors if that were deemed appropriate. Officer 001. expressed appreciation for being abl. to . '. speak to us in an unsanitized way so that she could give her impression of the LAPD. She stated emphatically ~hat the LAPD is more concerned with the fingernail polish a woman officer wears than it is with an officer "illegally kicking ass in an alley." She also offered that the Foothill Division has long had a reputation for being a bastion of "rednecked, tobacco-chewing e guys. II As a result, she was not surprised that the King incident - 2 - occurred. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She also related that she has worked with a few of the officers who were involved in the King incident. Officer 001 was assigned to the Foothill Division at one time. She stated that she "caused some waves" by going to the Women's Coordinator in Chief Gates' office to discuss her promotion in the Foothill Division only after she had unsuccessfully attempted to resolve this matter with the Captain of the Division. She was termed a troublemaker and thereafter several personnel complaints were filed against her, although she had received outstanding ratings previously. In a haggard and beleaguered tone, she stated that "I have gone through the mill." II. OFFICER OOl'S LAPD HISTORY Officer 001 became interested in the LAPD in 1983 when a close friend, who was an LAPD officer, suggested that she apply to the Department. At that time, the LAPD was actively seeking women applicants. She called Parker Center to get information and experienced no difficulties getting an application. A. Tests Officer 001 passed the written test the first time and was interviewed by two or three Sergeants for her oral examination. One question she recalls being asked concerned how she would handle a fight at Dodger Stadium if it occurred while ~ she was off-duty. The questions were not difficult because most - 3 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORN&Y WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE of them were vague. She received a test score of 90 on her orals. She also recalls being given some written material at the time of her exams, but she does not remember what they covered. Officer 001 believes the LAPD does a good job of screening out applicants who would not become good police officers. This opinion is based upon her observation that she has been assigned to a number of "sharp" probationary officers. She acknowledges, however, that the LAPD is more rednecked than she imagined. She believes the LAPD does a great job of screening felons and drug abusers, but it has to employ better methods in order to screen out rednecks. Those individuals who have biased predispositions easily get through the Academy by repressing their inbred and deepseated beliefs. She feels that there are many officers who believe they can get away with even the most serious forms of misconduct. Officer 001 is not certain how thorough the LAPD's background investigation of her may have been because the LAPD apparently did not contact her father, who does not reside in California. The LAPD did contact a manager at a bank where she was employed and a few of her neighbors. She has no idea what questions were asked of them. - 4 - • • • B. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Assignments/Promotions Officer 001 has been a police officer for seven years. She has been assigned to the Central and Foothill Divisions and was a staff Writer in the Planning and Research Division for a year and a half. She spoke harshly of the "good old boy system." Officer 001 has received at least five to six commendations, most of them as a result of her high productivity. She has been disciplined for misconduct. She received four suspension days for taking too long with a DUI Report and another four-day suspension for "contempt of supervision." She also was administratively transferred from the Foothill Division. III. TRAINING OFFICER SELECTION Officer 001 has been a training officer for four years and has been assigned to a recruit for at least 75% of that time. She explained that she decided to take the position as training officer because she was "bound and determined to make it out of the Foothill Division." - 5 - • • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODU~ ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She recalls taking ten oral examinations altogether to apply for a training officer's position before she got one; three of those were with a Captain. She took a one-day, eight-hour course at Parker Center after becoming a training officer, but she was training probationary officers for at least three years by that time. The course covered such subjects as the writing of reports, documentation generally and the rating of probationary officers. She was given the Field Training Officers' Manual then. She has attended no follow-up courses. Officer 001 does not recall discussions about race relations, sex discrimination or the LAPD's use of force policy at the course she attended. Although she does recall the LAPD offering a five-day training officer school, she has not been offered refresher courses for training officers. Some courses dealing with particular problems have been offered -- for example, courses on shooting tactics, juvenile procedures and advance officers' training. Officer 001 has received no special training within her Division concerning how to train probationary • officers. She cannot recall any seminars or roll call sessions - 6 - • • • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE at which the Division Captain or some other officer discussed how probationary officers should be trained. V. EVALUATION OF PROBATIONARY OFFICERS Officer 001 evaluates probationary officers on the basis of "the 30 points of observation" outlined in the Training Officers' Manual. She does her evaluations twice a month. Some of the factors she considers include report writing, driving, officer safety and relations with other officers. The only written departmental policy that she noted could be found in the Training Officers' Manual itself. She stated that no one policy is emphasized over another. Officer 001 stressed that the probationary officer's attitude toward the public is one element that she evaluates. If she noticed a probationary officer being very rude to people, it would affect her evaluation of the officer. She would probably try to talk to him/her first to see if a problem exists. Officer 001 has never witnessed a probationary officer using racial slurs when the officer talked to suspects or witnesses. She stressed that such statements would be intolerable. Although the newer recruits have not used racial slurs, Officer 001 definitively stated that she has been in the presence of senior officers who have done so . - 7 - . - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Officer 001 explained that probationary officers are rotated every two to three months between training officers during their probationary year, and the frequency with which she is assigned to a probationary officer has ebbed and flowed. She does not think that her performance evaluations are affected by the success or failure of the probationary officers she supervises, and she is not aware that generally the evaluation of other training officers are so affected. Rather, she believes performance evaluations are affected more by the personal feelings the supervisor has for the officer being evaluated. VI. OFFICER 001'8 ATTITUDES ABOUT THE JOB Officer 001 stated that she enjoys working with probationary officers. She enjoys the freedom and control she has in the car and the fact that no veterans are pushing her around. She does the best she can to train probationary officers to be good officers, and she does feel responsible for them to a point. Probationary officers apparently are very much aware of her feelings about misconduct generally. She feels that she has a responsibility to weed out probationary officers who would not, in her opinion, make good police officers, but she has not had a problem thus far. Officer 001 believes the newer recruits are not the ~ problem, but the senior officers are. She describes the younger - 8 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE officers as being better educated and more tolerant. She has heard that it is difficult for the LAPD to terminate probationary officers whose performances have been unsatisfactory because too much documentation is required, but she doesn't have a firm opinion regarding this. She believes that proper field training is important for the future success of the LAPD, but she asks "How do you train someone who has bad predispositions in the first place?" Those individuals can suppress their predispositions in the Academy and get through it easily. She thinks that her superiors share this view. VII. MISCONDUCT IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD views misconduct involving a probationary officer/training officer team more seriously because the probationary officer could be fired while the training officer will take a suspension. She explained that the probationary officers are more expendable. Whether misconduct generally by training officers are dealt with more seriously, less seriously or about the same as misconduct by other patrol officers really depends upon the circumstances and the seriousness of the misconduct. She stated that if she were riding with a probationary officer under her supervision and the officer did something that ~ .was against departmental policy, the seriousness of the - 9 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE misconduct would be the determining factor in her decision whether or not to report it. She would report drug use, excessive force in making an arrest, and improper tactics, for example. But, she noted that there was an unwritten rule at the LAPD regarding "snitching" on fellow officers. As a result, a lot of misconduct go unreported. She opined that officers tend to burn out because to survive in their jobs they have to keep their mouths shut. She stated that there is some misconduct which is inconsequential (~,taking too much time for lunch). However, there are other forms of misconduct which are very, very serious. Among the misconduct the LAPD views more seriously than others are stealing and drug use. The LAPD is also big on honesty . She stated that other forms of misconduct which should be given great weight are physical/violent misconduct, especially those involving improper use of force. She has instructed probationary officers with whom she works to apologize to anyone they unnecessarily detain, but officers generally do this without having to be told. Officer 001 explained that if a probationary officer did something she disapproved of but it did not violate the letter of an LAPD policy, she would most likely include it in an evaluation because not to document it might make her guilty of misconduct as well. She has told probationary officers that if - 10 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE they witness any misconduct they should come to her and she would handle it. She reiterated that whether or not she tells her superiors about any misconduct she witnesses depends upon the seriousness of the misconduct. VIII. USE OF FORCE GENERALLY IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD uses excessive force regularly. She stated that there is no justifiable reason for its officers doing so. She describes some officers as being "badge-heavy" -- they freely throw their weight around because they have a gun and a badge. If she had been present at the King incident and had tried to stop it, her life would have been "a living hell." The senior officers would have turned on her, and the new officers would treat her similarly because of peer pressure and their eagerness to please the senior officers. Officer 001 believes males generally have more of a problem with this than females do. She also maintains that the excessive use of force is a systemic problem in the LAPD and it is not a matter of there just being a few bad apples. She believes that a number of other officers share her views. Officer 001 also explained that this is not an Academy training problem. She believes the Academy teaches all recruits the proper use of force, but there are officers who are predisposed to using excessive force. She suggests that a better - 11 - . . HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE way to deal with these officers is to increase the fear of punishment by letting all officers know that excessive and improper use of force will not be tolerated. If there were some community "watchdogs," there would be a greater fear of getting caught and a greater fear of punishment. She cited Chief McNamara, former Chief of the San Jose Police Department, as being a model Chief because he justifiably punished officers who engaged in misconduct. Officer 001 stated that utilizing community watchdogs or Internal Affairs officers to observe officers in the field is advisable. A hard line position is needed, not something so indeterminate as is the case now. Officer 001 emphasized that the moral fabric and character of most of the officers cannot be changed through training, but the LAPD can change how they behave by punishing them harshly for misbehavior. IX. THE RODNEY KING INCIDENT Officer 001 believes the twenty-one officers at the scene of the King incident could have restrained him easily. LAPD officers are trained to use the "swarm technique," and it was not applied in that instance. She saw a lot of probationary officers standing around and she believes that explains why they were particularly fearful of preventing the more senior officers - 12 - F I ~ 1• HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE from committing the acts. She again cited the incredible burden of peer pressure. Officer 001 also noted that the Sergeant in command was weak in that he did not take control. The falsification of police reports and the inaccurate reporting of the extent of King's injuries were additional indications of wrongdoing. Officer 001 knows all of the officers who have been charged in the King incident and stated that they should have swarmed King in order to detain him immediately. She was not surprised that this happened because it is not unusual for LAPD officers to use excessive force, especially when they know they can get away with it. X. CITIZEN COMPLAINTS AGAINST LAPD OFFICERS Officer 001 believes the system for citizen complaints is unfair and inadequate as it is presently constituted. She stated that citizens are given the run-around because they are treated rudely by watch commanders when they come to.the stations to file complaints. The less educated, more often than not minority, citizens are intimidated by the process. She pointed out that the LAPD tends to listen to· middle class and wealthy citizens, and those citizens are more likely to press any complaints they bring because they can afford to do so. She ~ suggested that people outside the LAPD should be involved in - 13 - reviewing citizen complaints. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She also pointed out that the majority of LAPD officers hates the media, the ACLU and anyone else who does not share their beliefs. XI. INTERNAL DISCIPLINE IN THE LAPD Officer 001 declared that a team player or "one of the boys" is treated more leniently in internal investigations than someone who freely voices his/her opinions. She stated that it is who you are and who you know that is important. It has been her experience that the LAPD does not like assertive women, for example. She explained that the LAPD's attitude is insidious and difficult to prove. XII. PROMOTIONS IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes a great deal of bias exists in the promotion system and that some officers are promoted too quickly while others are promoted too slowly. She did not elaborate on this matter. XIII. ASSIGNMENTS/TRANSFERS WITHIN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD should require officers to transfer between Divisions on a regular basis. Such transfers are necessary to avoid stagnation and to prevent the development ~ of the various cliques that form within Divisions. She pointed - 14 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE to the old adage that "birds of a feather flock together" and emphasized that it is this reality in the LAPD which breeds problems. XIV. THE LAPD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS Officer 001 agrees that it is important for LAPD officers to attend community meetings. She suggested that stations be open to the public on certain designated days so that citizens can come in and see what police officers do and how the station is operated. XV. THE TREATMENT OF GAYS/LESBIANS BY THE LAPD Officer 001 stated that a gay or lesbian LAPD officer would not dare "come out of the closet." She cited the example of Officer Greberson, who was considered an outstanding policeman until he declared he was gay. She stated that gay and lesbian citizens are not treated differently to their faces, but they are openly discussed in a negative light among officers. XVI. THE TREATMENT OF RACIAL MINORITIES BY THE LAPD Officer 001 pointed out that the Foothill Division traditionally has very few Black officers, and this has always been a problem. She cited an example in which a Black officer there informed her that he was recruited by the Captain solely - 15 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE because he was a good runner and a welcomed addition to the Division's athletic team. She also pointed out that a Black woman officer came forward recently and complained publicly when she found a KKK sticker on her car, which was parked at the Foothill Station. She was incredibly brave for having done so because other officers in the Division have "bad-mouthed" her ever since. XVII. OFFICER 001'8 RECOMMENDATIONS Officer 001 believes the emphasis should be on more than just Academy training. When recruits break away from the constraints of the Academy, they exhibit the behavior to which they are predisposed. She strongly suggests that every officer be regularly exposed to refresher courses at the roll call level concerning use of force, sensitivity to all people in the community they serve, and proper interactions among and between all officers and those they are supposed to protect and serve. These sessions should be offered when the new officers are integrated with senior officers. Officer 001 offered that whether graduation from Field Training Officers' School should be mandatory before training officers are assigned to probationary officers largely depends upon the courses which are taught at the school. She emphasized ~ that the curriculum should be modified so that greater emphasis - 16 - I . ~ \ . • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE is placed on appropriate use of force, sensitivity to ethnic and cultural differences, awareness of race/gender/sexual orientation bias and training techniques. Officer 001 added that any officer who is predisposed to engage in misconduct must be made to fear being caught and being punished as a result. She stressed that the punishment that exists now is inadequate. She reiterated that the problems which exist in the LAPD do not relate to the training of its officers, but better training would not hurt. - 17 -
Object Description
Title | LAPD interviews #3(b) (2 of 2), 1991 May-June |
Description | Los Angeles Police Department interviews #3(b) (2 of 2), 1991 May 31 - June 19. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
Coverage date | 1991-05-31/1991-06-19 |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
Date created | 1991-05-31/1991-06-19 |
Type | texts |
Format | 213 p. |
Format (aat) | transcriptions (documents) |
Format (imt) | application/pdf |
Language | English |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
Series | Independent Commission File List |
File | Los Angeles Police Department Interviews |
Box and folder | box 24, folder 14 |
Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
Filename | indep-box24-14 |
Description
Title | Richardson & Varanini FTO interview 001, 1991-06-19 |
Description | Richardson & Varanini FTO interviews - memo re: interview of field training officer 001 - from: Tony L Richardson/ Emilio Varanini; to: The Christopher Commission/ Louise LaMothe/ Julie Huffman |
Coverage date | 1991-06-19 |
Date created | 1991-06-19 |
Type | texts |
Format | 18 p. |
Format (aat) | transcriptions (documents) |
Format (imt) | application/pdf |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Series | Independent Commission File List |
File | Los Angeles Police Department Interviews |
Box and folder | box 24, folder 14, item 1 |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Full text | • • • • • TO: PROM: DATE: RE: KIRKLAND & ELLIS MEMORANDUM HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE The Christopher Commission, Louise LaMothe, Julie Huffman Tony L. Richardson and ~ Emilio Varanini June 19, 1991 Interview of Field Training Officer 001 I. PERSONAL BACKGROUND We interviewed Field Training Officer 001 ("Officer 001") on June 12, 1991. She hite female. Officer 001 is a high school graduate who has studied liberal arts courses in college, earning forty units toward graduation. She has lived in the Los Angeles area for fifteen years. Prior to becoming a police officer, Officer 001 held various office jobs, A strong desire for job stability and greater career options lead her to the LAPD. She had no grandiose ideas about police work, but she did describe herself as a compassionate and caring person. She avoided the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department because it had a reputation of being a "redneck organization." In response to our questions concerning why she • volunteered to be interviewed by the Christopher Commission, . ... HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Officer 001 stated that the LAPD neither actively encouraged nor discouraged her from being interviewed. She does not recall any discussion at roll call, for example, in which her superiors urged officers to cooperate with the Commission. In fact, the majority of LAPD officers views the Commission as a nuisance and feel that the King affair has been exploited by the media. When she received a form letter from Chief Gates concerning these interviews, she decided she would participate. Officer 001 fears reprisals from her colleagues if her candid statements to the Commission were publicized. We assured her that the Commission would f. trea~ her stateme11ts · in ·~ ighly ... .. confidential manner -- that for all intents and purposes her remarks will be anonymous. Upon receiving this assurance, she stated that she would speak openly and would even testify before the Commission behind closed doors if that were deemed appropriate. Officer 001. expressed appreciation for being abl. to . '. speak to us in an unsanitized way so that she could give her impression of the LAPD. She stated emphatically ~hat the LAPD is more concerned with the fingernail polish a woman officer wears than it is with an officer "illegally kicking ass in an alley." She also offered that the Foothill Division has long had a reputation for being a bastion of "rednecked, tobacco-chewing e guys. II As a result, she was not surprised that the King incident - 2 - occurred. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She also related that she has worked with a few of the officers who were involved in the King incident. Officer 001 was assigned to the Foothill Division at one time. She stated that she "caused some waves" by going to the Women's Coordinator in Chief Gates' office to discuss her promotion in the Foothill Division only after she had unsuccessfully attempted to resolve this matter with the Captain of the Division. She was termed a troublemaker and thereafter several personnel complaints were filed against her, although she had received outstanding ratings previously. In a haggard and beleaguered tone, she stated that "I have gone through the mill." II. OFFICER OOl'S LAPD HISTORY Officer 001 became interested in the LAPD in 1983 when a close friend, who was an LAPD officer, suggested that she apply to the Department. At that time, the LAPD was actively seeking women applicants. She called Parker Center to get information and experienced no difficulties getting an application. A. Tests Officer 001 passed the written test the first time and was interviewed by two or three Sergeants for her oral examination. One question she recalls being asked concerned how she would handle a fight at Dodger Stadium if it occurred while ~ she was off-duty. The questions were not difficult because most - 3 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORN&Y WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE of them were vague. She received a test score of 90 on her orals. She also recalls being given some written material at the time of her exams, but she does not remember what they covered. Officer 001 believes the LAPD does a good job of screening out applicants who would not become good police officers. This opinion is based upon her observation that she has been assigned to a number of "sharp" probationary officers. She acknowledges, however, that the LAPD is more rednecked than she imagined. She believes the LAPD does a great job of screening felons and drug abusers, but it has to employ better methods in order to screen out rednecks. Those individuals who have biased predispositions easily get through the Academy by repressing their inbred and deepseated beliefs. She feels that there are many officers who believe they can get away with even the most serious forms of misconduct. Officer 001 is not certain how thorough the LAPD's background investigation of her may have been because the LAPD apparently did not contact her father, who does not reside in California. The LAPD did contact a manager at a bank where she was employed and a few of her neighbors. She has no idea what questions were asked of them. - 4 - • • • B. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Assignments/Promotions Officer 001 has been a police officer for seven years. She has been assigned to the Central and Foothill Divisions and was a staff Writer in the Planning and Research Division for a year and a half. She spoke harshly of the "good old boy system." Officer 001 has received at least five to six commendations, most of them as a result of her high productivity. She has been disciplined for misconduct. She received four suspension days for taking too long with a DUI Report and another four-day suspension for "contempt of supervision." She also was administratively transferred from the Foothill Division. III. TRAINING OFFICER SELECTION Officer 001 has been a training officer for four years and has been assigned to a recruit for at least 75% of that time. She explained that she decided to take the position as training officer because she was "bound and determined to make it out of the Foothill Division." - 5 - • • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODU~ ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She recalls taking ten oral examinations altogether to apply for a training officer's position before she got one; three of those were with a Captain. She took a one-day, eight-hour course at Parker Center after becoming a training officer, but she was training probationary officers for at least three years by that time. The course covered such subjects as the writing of reports, documentation generally and the rating of probationary officers. She was given the Field Training Officers' Manual then. She has attended no follow-up courses. Officer 001 does not recall discussions about race relations, sex discrimination or the LAPD's use of force policy at the course she attended. Although she does recall the LAPD offering a five-day training officer school, she has not been offered refresher courses for training officers. Some courses dealing with particular problems have been offered -- for example, courses on shooting tactics, juvenile procedures and advance officers' training. Officer 001 has received no special training within her Division concerning how to train probationary • officers. She cannot recall any seminars or roll call sessions - 6 - • • • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE at which the Division Captain or some other officer discussed how probationary officers should be trained. V. EVALUATION OF PROBATIONARY OFFICERS Officer 001 evaluates probationary officers on the basis of "the 30 points of observation" outlined in the Training Officers' Manual. She does her evaluations twice a month. Some of the factors she considers include report writing, driving, officer safety and relations with other officers. The only written departmental policy that she noted could be found in the Training Officers' Manual itself. She stated that no one policy is emphasized over another. Officer 001 stressed that the probationary officer's attitude toward the public is one element that she evaluates. If she noticed a probationary officer being very rude to people, it would affect her evaluation of the officer. She would probably try to talk to him/her first to see if a problem exists. Officer 001 has never witnessed a probationary officer using racial slurs when the officer talked to suspects or witnesses. She stressed that such statements would be intolerable. Although the newer recruits have not used racial slurs, Officer 001 definitively stated that she has been in the presence of senior officers who have done so . - 7 - . - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Officer 001 explained that probationary officers are rotated every two to three months between training officers during their probationary year, and the frequency with which she is assigned to a probationary officer has ebbed and flowed. She does not think that her performance evaluations are affected by the success or failure of the probationary officers she supervises, and she is not aware that generally the evaluation of other training officers are so affected. Rather, she believes performance evaluations are affected more by the personal feelings the supervisor has for the officer being evaluated. VI. OFFICER 001'8 ATTITUDES ABOUT THE JOB Officer 001 stated that she enjoys working with probationary officers. She enjoys the freedom and control she has in the car and the fact that no veterans are pushing her around. She does the best she can to train probationary officers to be good officers, and she does feel responsible for them to a point. Probationary officers apparently are very much aware of her feelings about misconduct generally. She feels that she has a responsibility to weed out probationary officers who would not, in her opinion, make good police officers, but she has not had a problem thus far. Officer 001 believes the newer recruits are not the ~ problem, but the senior officers are. She describes the younger - 8 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE officers as being better educated and more tolerant. She has heard that it is difficult for the LAPD to terminate probationary officers whose performances have been unsatisfactory because too much documentation is required, but she doesn't have a firm opinion regarding this. She believes that proper field training is important for the future success of the LAPD, but she asks "How do you train someone who has bad predispositions in the first place?" Those individuals can suppress their predispositions in the Academy and get through it easily. She thinks that her superiors share this view. VII. MISCONDUCT IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD views misconduct involving a probationary officer/training officer team more seriously because the probationary officer could be fired while the training officer will take a suspension. She explained that the probationary officers are more expendable. Whether misconduct generally by training officers are dealt with more seriously, less seriously or about the same as misconduct by other patrol officers really depends upon the circumstances and the seriousness of the misconduct. She stated that if she were riding with a probationary officer under her supervision and the officer did something that ~ .was against departmental policy, the seriousness of the - 9 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE misconduct would be the determining factor in her decision whether or not to report it. She would report drug use, excessive force in making an arrest, and improper tactics, for example. But, she noted that there was an unwritten rule at the LAPD regarding "snitching" on fellow officers. As a result, a lot of misconduct go unreported. She opined that officers tend to burn out because to survive in their jobs they have to keep their mouths shut. She stated that there is some misconduct which is inconsequential (~,taking too much time for lunch). However, there are other forms of misconduct which are very, very serious. Among the misconduct the LAPD views more seriously than others are stealing and drug use. The LAPD is also big on honesty . She stated that other forms of misconduct which should be given great weight are physical/violent misconduct, especially those involving improper use of force. She has instructed probationary officers with whom she works to apologize to anyone they unnecessarily detain, but officers generally do this without having to be told. Officer 001 explained that if a probationary officer did something she disapproved of but it did not violate the letter of an LAPD policy, she would most likely include it in an evaluation because not to document it might make her guilty of misconduct as well. She has told probationary officers that if - 10 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE they witness any misconduct they should come to her and she would handle it. She reiterated that whether or not she tells her superiors about any misconduct she witnesses depends upon the seriousness of the misconduct. VIII. USE OF FORCE GENERALLY IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD uses excessive force regularly. She stated that there is no justifiable reason for its officers doing so. She describes some officers as being "badge-heavy" -- they freely throw their weight around because they have a gun and a badge. If she had been present at the King incident and had tried to stop it, her life would have been "a living hell." The senior officers would have turned on her, and the new officers would treat her similarly because of peer pressure and their eagerness to please the senior officers. Officer 001 believes males generally have more of a problem with this than females do. She also maintains that the excessive use of force is a systemic problem in the LAPD and it is not a matter of there just being a few bad apples. She believes that a number of other officers share her views. Officer 001 also explained that this is not an Academy training problem. She believes the Academy teaches all recruits the proper use of force, but there are officers who are predisposed to using excessive force. She suggests that a better - 11 - . . HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE way to deal with these officers is to increase the fear of punishment by letting all officers know that excessive and improper use of force will not be tolerated. If there were some community "watchdogs," there would be a greater fear of getting caught and a greater fear of punishment. She cited Chief McNamara, former Chief of the San Jose Police Department, as being a model Chief because he justifiably punished officers who engaged in misconduct. Officer 001 stated that utilizing community watchdogs or Internal Affairs officers to observe officers in the field is advisable. A hard line position is needed, not something so indeterminate as is the case now. Officer 001 emphasized that the moral fabric and character of most of the officers cannot be changed through training, but the LAPD can change how they behave by punishing them harshly for misbehavior. IX. THE RODNEY KING INCIDENT Officer 001 believes the twenty-one officers at the scene of the King incident could have restrained him easily. LAPD officers are trained to use the "swarm technique," and it was not applied in that instance. She saw a lot of probationary officers standing around and she believes that explains why they were particularly fearful of preventing the more senior officers - 12 - F I ~ 1• HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE from committing the acts. She again cited the incredible burden of peer pressure. Officer 001 also noted that the Sergeant in command was weak in that he did not take control. The falsification of police reports and the inaccurate reporting of the extent of King's injuries were additional indications of wrongdoing. Officer 001 knows all of the officers who have been charged in the King incident and stated that they should have swarmed King in order to detain him immediately. She was not surprised that this happened because it is not unusual for LAPD officers to use excessive force, especially when they know they can get away with it. X. CITIZEN COMPLAINTS AGAINST LAPD OFFICERS Officer 001 believes the system for citizen complaints is unfair and inadequate as it is presently constituted. She stated that citizens are given the run-around because they are treated rudely by watch commanders when they come to.the stations to file complaints. The less educated, more often than not minority, citizens are intimidated by the process. She pointed out that the LAPD tends to listen to· middle class and wealthy citizens, and those citizens are more likely to press any complaints they bring because they can afford to do so. She ~ suggested that people outside the LAPD should be involved in - 13 - reviewing citizen complaints. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE She also pointed out that the majority of LAPD officers hates the media, the ACLU and anyone else who does not share their beliefs. XI. INTERNAL DISCIPLINE IN THE LAPD Officer 001 declared that a team player or "one of the boys" is treated more leniently in internal investigations than someone who freely voices his/her opinions. She stated that it is who you are and who you know that is important. It has been her experience that the LAPD does not like assertive women, for example. She explained that the LAPD's attitude is insidious and difficult to prove. XII. PROMOTIONS IN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes a great deal of bias exists in the promotion system and that some officers are promoted too quickly while others are promoted too slowly. She did not elaborate on this matter. XIII. ASSIGNMENTS/TRANSFERS WITHIN THE LAPD Officer 001 believes the LAPD should require officers to transfer between Divisions on a regular basis. Such transfers are necessary to avoid stagnation and to prevent the development ~ of the various cliques that form within Divisions. She pointed - 14 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE to the old adage that "birds of a feather flock together" and emphasized that it is this reality in the LAPD which breeds problems. XIV. THE LAPD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS Officer 001 agrees that it is important for LAPD officers to attend community meetings. She suggested that stations be open to the public on certain designated days so that citizens can come in and see what police officers do and how the station is operated. XV. THE TREATMENT OF GAYS/LESBIANS BY THE LAPD Officer 001 stated that a gay or lesbian LAPD officer would not dare "come out of the closet." She cited the example of Officer Greberson, who was considered an outstanding policeman until he declared he was gay. She stated that gay and lesbian citizens are not treated differently to their faces, but they are openly discussed in a negative light among officers. XVI. THE TREATMENT OF RACIAL MINORITIES BY THE LAPD Officer 001 pointed out that the Foothill Division traditionally has very few Black officers, and this has always been a problem. She cited an example in which a Black officer there informed her that he was recruited by the Captain solely - 15 - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE because he was a good runner and a welcomed addition to the Division's athletic team. She also pointed out that a Black woman officer came forward recently and complained publicly when she found a KKK sticker on her car, which was parked at the Foothill Station. She was incredibly brave for having done so because other officers in the Division have "bad-mouthed" her ever since. XVII. OFFICER 001'8 RECOMMENDATIONS Officer 001 believes the emphasis should be on more than just Academy training. When recruits break away from the constraints of the Academy, they exhibit the behavior to which they are predisposed. She strongly suggests that every officer be regularly exposed to refresher courses at the roll call level concerning use of force, sensitivity to all people in the community they serve, and proper interactions among and between all officers and those they are supposed to protect and serve. These sessions should be offered when the new officers are integrated with senior officers. Officer 001 offered that whether graduation from Field Training Officers' School should be mandatory before training officers are assigned to probationary officers largely depends upon the courses which are taught at the school. She emphasized ~ that the curriculum should be modified so that greater emphasis - 16 - I . ~ \ . • HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE is placed on appropriate use of force, sensitivity to ethnic and cultural differences, awareness of race/gender/sexual orientation bias and training techniques. Officer 001 added that any officer who is predisposed to engage in misconduct must be made to fear being caught and being punished as a result. She stressed that the punishment that exists now is inadequate. She reiterated that the problems which exist in the LAPD do not relate to the training of its officers, but better training would not hurt. - 17 - |
Filename | indep-box24-14-01.pdf |
Archival file | Volume81/indep-box24-14-01.pdf |