Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 102 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 102 of 141 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Since March 3,« 1991, we have seen the beatiny of Mr. King turn into Lhe political lynching of Chief Daryl Cates. During the lasL month and a half we have witnessed a frightening trend in Litis city. Special interest groups are using this incident to further their own political agendas and quest for power. It has long been the desire of many special interest groups to gain poliLical control over our police department and to be able to hire and fire the police chief based on the prevailing political winds. These bpeeial inLeicst yroups have lost interest (if they indeed ever had any) in Lhe real victim, Rodney King, and have instead focused their efforts on turning Lhe clocks back to 1930's when a job un the LAPD was the best job money could buy. Wi Lh Lhe landmax K iefui.ms of 1930, jobs were no longer bought and sold. And civil set vice protection was put in place to protect police officers from Lhe arbitrary actions of politicians. Los Angeles would not follow the lead of Eastern police departments, and allow politicians Lo ube Lhe police department for their own purposes. Our police department would nul act on behalf of the politicians, Lahlny an active roLe in election campaigns because of control from City Hall. Chief GaLes continues this tradition. His department has
Object Description
Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD |
Description | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD: ❧ Section 1: Statement of Stewart Kwoh, executive director of Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California (APALC) ❧ Section 2: Testimony of Vibiana Andrade, regional counsel of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) ❧ Section 2: Exhibit A - letter - from: Antonia Hernandez, MALDEF president and general counsel ❧ Section 2: Exhibit B - MALDEF Annual Report, 1989-90 ❧ Section 3: Summary of testimony of R. Samuel Paz on behalf of the Mexican American Bar Association of the LA County ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Lt. William D. Hall) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 2 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Det. Jerry L. Mount) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 3 - Investigation of officer-involved shootings ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 4 - R. Samuel Paz - resume ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 5 - Newspaper Clippings ❧ Section 4: Testimony of Citizens in Support of the Chief of Police (CISCOP) ❧ Section 5: Summary of testimony of Roger Coggan, esq., director, legal services department, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center ❧ Section 5: attachment 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Mitchels Grobeson, et al. v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Kenneth G. Bickman) ❧ Section 5: attachment 2 - letter - from: Roger Coggan, director, legal services, LA Gay and Lesbian Community; to: Ira Reiner, LA County district attorney, and James Hahn, LA city attorney ❧ Section 5: attachment 3 - Article - "How bad are relations between gays and the LAPD?" ❧ Section 5: attachment 4 - "Declaration of Thomas J. Coleman, Jr." ❧ Section 5: attachment 5 - "Testimony of Christopher Commission" ❧ Section 6: "Report to Independent Commission" by Louis A. Custrini, vice-president-communications, Merchants and Manufacturers Association ❧ Index. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
Coverage date | 1991-05-01 |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
Date created | 1991-05-01 |
Type | texts |
Format | 141 p. |
Format (aat) | presentations (communicative events) |
Format (imt) | application/pdf |
Language | English |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
Series | Independent Commission File List |
File | Public Sessions |
Box and folder | box 24, folder 24 |
Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
Filename | indep-box24-24 |
Description
Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 102 |
Format (imt) | image/tiff |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Full text | Since March 3,« 1991, we have seen the beatiny of Mr. King turn into Lhe political lynching of Chief Daryl Cates. During the lasL month and a half we have witnessed a frightening trend in Litis city. Special interest groups are using this incident to further their own political agendas and quest for power. It has long been the desire of many special interest groups to gain poliLical control over our police department and to be able to hire and fire the police chief based on the prevailing political winds. These bpeeial inLeicst yroups have lost interest (if they indeed ever had any) in Lhe real victim, Rodney King, and have instead focused their efforts on turning Lhe clocks back to 1930's when a job un the LAPD was the best job money could buy. Wi Lh Lhe landmax K iefui.ms of 1930, jobs were no longer bought and sold. And civil set vice protection was put in place to protect police officers from Lhe arbitrary actions of politicians. Los Angeles would not follow the lead of Eastern police departments, and allow politicians Lo ube Lhe police department for their own purposes. Our police department would nul act on behalf of the politicians, Lahlny an active roLe in election campaigns because of control from City Hall. Chief GaLes continues this tradition. His department has |
Filename | indep-box24-24-12~03.tif |
Archival file | Volume79/indep-box24-24-12~03.tif |