Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 92 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 92 of 141 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
kAik..
..*:.
Police officers who are witnesses to or participate in
shooting incidents are escorted from the scene to the division
station to await questioning by an OIS investigator. For the^-
most part, officer interviews have not been conducted separately in
the past nor have tape recordings been made of these interviews.
Detailed written notes are made and retained by the investigating
OIS officer.2
Upon completion of its investigation of incidents involving
the infliction of gunshot wounds, the OIS team forwards a
confidential report, in narrative form, to the Shooting Review
Board. Where a weapon has been discharged but no gunshot wound has
resulted, the supervisor of the involved employee responsible for
the investigation submits a report through organizational channels
to the Shooting Review Board.
Department Manual Section 3/796.25 ("Assignment of Officer
Inflicting Gunshot Wound") provides:
"The concerned commanding officer shall remove from
field duty an officer who inflicts a gunshot wound on
any person. An officer shall not be returned to field
duty except by his commanding officer, with the concurrence of the concerned group or bureau commanding
officer."
2
Retention of investigative notes made by OIS investigators
represent a policy change effected by the Department after recent
Police Commission hearings pertaining to the matter.
Object Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD |
| Description | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD: ❧ Section 1: Statement of Stewart Kwoh, executive director of Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California (APALC) ❧ Section 2: Testimony of Vibiana Andrade, regional counsel of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) ❧ Section 2: Exhibit A - letter - from: Antonia Hernandez, MALDEF president and general counsel ❧ Section 2: Exhibit B - MALDEF Annual Report, 1989-90 ❧ Section 3: Summary of testimony of R. Samuel Paz on behalf of the Mexican American Bar Association of the LA County ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Lt. William D. Hall) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 2 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Det. Jerry L. Mount) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 3 - Investigation of officer-involved shootings ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 4 - R. Samuel Paz - resume ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 5 - Newspaper Clippings ❧ Section 4: Testimony of Citizens in Support of the Chief of Police (CISCOP) ❧ Section 5: Summary of testimony of Roger Coggan, esq., director, legal services department, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center ❧ Section 5: attachment 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Mitchels Grobeson, et al. v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Kenneth G. Bickman) ❧ Section 5: attachment 2 - letter - from: Roger Coggan, director, legal services, LA Gay and Lesbian Community; to: Ira Reiner, LA County district attorney, and James Hahn, LA city attorney ❧ Section 5: attachment 3 - Article - "How bad are relations between gays and the LAPD?" ❧ Section 5: attachment 4 - "Declaration of Thomas J. Coleman, Jr." ❧ Section 5: attachment 5 - "Testimony of Christopher Commission" ❧ Section 6: "Report to Independent Commission" by Louis A. Custrini, vice-president-communications, Merchants and Manufacturers Association ❧ Index. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
| Coverage date | 1991-05-01 |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
| Date created | 1991-05-01 |
| Type | texts |
| Format | 141 p. |
| Format (aat) | presentations (communicative events) |
| Format (imt) | application/pdf |
| Language | English |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
| Series | Independent Commission File List |
| File | Public Sessions |
| Box and folder | box 24, folder 24 |
| Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
| Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
| Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
| Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Filename | indep-box24-24 |
Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 92 |
| Format (imt) | image/tiff |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Full text | kAik.. ..*:. Police officers who are witnesses to or participate in shooting incidents are escorted from the scene to the division station to await questioning by an OIS investigator. For the^- most part, officer interviews have not been conducted separately in the past nor have tape recordings been made of these interviews. Detailed written notes are made and retained by the investigating OIS officer.2 Upon completion of its investigation of incidents involving the infliction of gunshot wounds, the OIS team forwards a confidential report, in narrative form, to the Shooting Review Board. Where a weapon has been discharged but no gunshot wound has resulted, the supervisor of the involved employee responsible for the investigation submits a report through organizational channels to the Shooting Review Board. Department Manual Section 3/796.25 ("Assignment of Officer Inflicting Gunshot Wound") provides: "The concerned commanding officer shall remove from field duty an officer who inflicts a gunshot wound on any person. An officer shall not be returned to field duty except by his commanding officer, with the concurrence of the concerned group or bureau commanding officer." 2 Retention of investigative notes made by OIS investigators represent a policy change effected by the Department after recent Police Commission hearings pertaining to the matter. |
| Filename | indep-box24-24-09~03.tif |
| Archival file | Volume79/indep-box24-24-09~03.tif |
