Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 72 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 72 of 141 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
1 A Two years.
2 Q And how long did you work as a supervisor in
3 homicide? Would that have been the same period of time?
4 A It would have been that same period of time
5 plus an additional year in Rampart Division.
6 Q Now, I understand that the Officer-Involved
7 Shooting Team is a portion of the Homicide Division?
8 A Of the Homicide Division, that's correct.
9 Q I also understand from previous testimony in
10 this case that the officer-involved shooting investigation
11 is not considered to be a criminal investigation. Is that
12 a correct statement?
13 A That's correct.
14 Q Is it — I'm sorry.
15 A Just to help explain it, I also have the
16 responsibility of supervising the criminal investigation;
17 however, it is a separate investigation, not done by the
18 same people.
19 Q It is my understanding that the officer-involved
20 shooting investigation is essentially an administrative
21 investigation.
22 A That's correct.
23 Q Would you tell me the difference from your
24 point of view what is the difference between the
25 administrative investigation and the criminal investigation
Idtkant A Sitonatr*
Object Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD |
| Description | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak at the May 1, 1991 public meeting of the Independent Commission of the LAPD: ❧ Section 1: Statement of Stewart Kwoh, executive director of Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California (APALC) ❧ Section 2: Testimony of Vibiana Andrade, regional counsel of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) ❧ Section 2: Exhibit A - letter - from: Antonia Hernandez, MALDEF president and general counsel ❧ Section 2: Exhibit B - MALDEF Annual Report, 1989-90 ❧ Section 3: Summary of testimony of R. Samuel Paz on behalf of the Mexican American Bar Association of the LA County ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Lt. William D. Hall) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 2 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Adelaido Altamirano v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Det. Jerry L. Mount) ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 3 - Investigation of officer-involved shootings ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 4 - R. Samuel Paz - resume ❧ Section 3: Exhibit 5 - Newspaper Clippings ❧ Section 4: Testimony of Citizens in Support of the Chief of Police (CISCOP) ❧ Section 5: Summary of testimony of Roger Coggan, esq., director, legal services department, Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center ❧ Section 5: attachment 1 - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of LA, Mitchels Grobeson, et al. v. The City of Los Angeles, et al. (deposition of Kenneth G. Bickman) ❧ Section 5: attachment 2 - letter - from: Roger Coggan, director, legal services, LA Gay and Lesbian Community; to: Ira Reiner, LA County district attorney, and James Hahn, LA city attorney ❧ Section 5: attachment 3 - Article - "How bad are relations between gays and the LAPD?" ❧ Section 5: attachment 4 - "Declaration of Thomas J. Coleman, Jr." ❧ Section 5: attachment 5 - "Testimony of Christopher Commission" ❧ Section 6: "Report to Independent Commission" by Louis A. Custrini, vice-president-communications, Merchants and Manufacturers Association ❧ Index. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
| Coverage date | 1991-05-01 |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
| Date created | 1991-05-01 |
| Type | texts |
| Format | 141 p. |
| Format (aat) | presentations (communicative events) |
| Format (imt) | application/pdf |
| Language | English |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
| Series | Independent Commission File List |
| File | Public Sessions |
| Box and folder | box 24, folder 24 |
| Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
| Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
| Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
| Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Filename | indep-box24-24 |
Description
| Title | Written statements submitted by witnesses scheduled to speak, p. 72 |
| Format (imt) | image/tiff |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Full text | 1 A Two years. 2 Q And how long did you work as a supervisor in 3 homicide? Would that have been the same period of time? 4 A It would have been that same period of time 5 plus an additional year in Rampart Division. 6 Q Now, I understand that the Officer-Involved 7 Shooting Team is a portion of the Homicide Division? 8 A Of the Homicide Division, that's correct. 9 Q I also understand from previous testimony in 10 this case that the officer-involved shooting investigation 11 is not considered to be a criminal investigation. Is that 12 a correct statement? 13 A That's correct. 14 Q Is it — I'm sorry. 15 A Just to help explain it, I also have the 16 responsibility of supervising the criminal investigation; 17 however, it is a separate investigation, not done by the 18 same people. 19 Q It is my understanding that the officer-involved 20 shooting investigation is essentially an administrative 21 investigation. 22 A That's correct. 23 Q Would you tell me the difference from your 24 point of view what is the difference between the 25 administrative investigation and the criminal investigation Idtkant A Sitonatr* |
| Filename | indep-box24-24-07~08.tif |
| Archival file | Volume79/indep-box24-24-07~08.tif |
