Correspondence: suggestions for the Commission (2 of 2), 1977-1991, p. 83 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 83 of 314 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NAME AND ADDRES^/!TrUci j A^D TWIT^fifeLCH°NE N° 215 NORTH LINCOLN STREET P. O. BOX 520 , SANTA MARIA, CA. 93454 ATTORNEY FOR (NAME): Respondent PHONE: (805) 925-2611 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA street address: 312 East Cook Street MAILING ADDRESS city and zip code. Santa Maria, CA 93454 branch name: Santa Maria MARRIAGE OF petitioner: NANCY DEETER respondent: RICHARD ALLAN DEETER RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR NOTICE OF MOTION CASE NUMBER: SM 26401 HEARING: DATE TIME DEPT.. ROOM. OR DIVISION 11/3/80 2:30 p.m. SM II I I Petitioner I x| Respondent | | Claimant responds to the Application for Order and Supporting Declaration 1. £X] CHILD CUSTODY AND SUPPORT b. □ I consent to the order requested a:#x~l I consent to the following order: That the support order not be modified unless it is reduced to an amount that the respondent is able to pay, and that child support be reduced to "0" during any month when the petitioner thwarts the visitation rights of the respondent. 2. □ WAGE ASSIGNMENT FOR CHILD SUPPORT a. I I I do not consent to the order requested. b. | | I consent to the following order: c. I I I consent to the order requested. 3. £x| CHILD VISITATION b. □ I consent to the order requested. a. (x31 consent to the following order: That any requirement of a bond be deleted as this has in effect resulted in the respondent not being able to visit with the children for over one year. It is also requested that there be no restriction on church attendance as long as it is a Christian church. That the children be allowed to travel to and 4. S spousal support IHB^BBIiBBHWBWWBBBgWMWP. a. RTII do not consent to the order requested. from the respondent's home for visi- b. □ I consent to the following order: tion purposes by commercial bus. 5. S3 ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS a. &xj I do not consent to the order requested. b. I I I consent to the following order: c. | I I consent to the order requested. 6. □ DWELLING EXCLUSION a. I I I do not consent to the order requested. b. [^3 I consent to the following order: c. HZ) I consent to the order requested. (Continued on reverse) The declaration under penalty of perjury must be signed in California, or in a state that authorizes use of a declaration in place of an affidavit; otherwise an affidavit is required. RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO ORDER TO Form Adopted by Rule 1285.40 Judicial Council of California Revised Effective January 1.1980 (FAMILY LAW) CL-331 SHOW CAUSE OR NOTICE OF MOTION
Object Description
Description
Title | Correspondence: suggestions for the Commission (2 of 2), 1977-1991, p. 83 |
Format (imt) | image/tiff |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Full text | ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NAME AND ADDRES^/!TrUci j A^D TWIT^fifeLCH°NE N° 215 NORTH LINCOLN STREET P. O. BOX 520 , SANTA MARIA, CA. 93454 ATTORNEY FOR (NAME): Respondent PHONE: (805) 925-2611 FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA street address: 312 East Cook Street MAILING ADDRESS city and zip code. Santa Maria, CA 93454 branch name: Santa Maria MARRIAGE OF petitioner: NANCY DEETER respondent: RICHARD ALLAN DEETER RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR NOTICE OF MOTION CASE NUMBER: SM 26401 HEARING: DATE TIME DEPT.. ROOM. OR DIVISION 11/3/80 2:30 p.m. SM II I I Petitioner I x| Respondent | | Claimant responds to the Application for Order and Supporting Declaration 1. £X] CHILD CUSTODY AND SUPPORT b. □ I consent to the order requested a:#x~l I consent to the following order: That the support order not be modified unless it is reduced to an amount that the respondent is able to pay, and that child support be reduced to "0" during any month when the petitioner thwarts the visitation rights of the respondent. 2. □ WAGE ASSIGNMENT FOR CHILD SUPPORT a. I I I do not consent to the order requested. b. | | I consent to the following order: c. I I I consent to the order requested. 3. £x| CHILD VISITATION b. □ I consent to the order requested. a. (x31 consent to the following order: That any requirement of a bond be deleted as this has in effect resulted in the respondent not being able to visit with the children for over one year. It is also requested that there be no restriction on church attendance as long as it is a Christian church. That the children be allowed to travel to and 4. S spousal support IHB^BBIiBBHWBWWBBBgWMWP. a. RTII do not consent to the order requested. from the respondent's home for visi- b. □ I consent to the following order: tion purposes by commercial bus. 5. S3 ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS a. &xj I do not consent to the order requested. b. I I I consent to the following order: c. | I I consent to the order requested. 6. □ DWELLING EXCLUSION a. I I I do not consent to the order requested. b. [^3 I consent to the following order: c. HZ) I consent to the order requested. (Continued on reverse) The declaration under penalty of perjury must be signed in California, or in a state that authorizes use of a declaration in place of an affidavit; otherwise an affidavit is required. RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO ORDER TO Form Adopted by Rule 1285.40 Judicial Council of California Revised Effective January 1.1980 (FAMILY LAW) CL-331 SHOW CAUSE OR NOTICE OF MOTION |
Filename | indep-box23-14-03~081.tif |
Archival file | Volume78/indep-box23-14-03~081.tif |