Correspondence: complaints against LAPD (2 of 2), 1989-04-17, p. 8 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 8 of 26 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Personnel Complaint
Page 7
8.2
Diethrich 'supports Ramirez. She heard Pellegrino state
something to the effect of "Chico wants to be a Mexican but
he is a Jew." .
Payne, Watts, G. Hall, Holcomb, Karlson, Michelena.
Montgomery, Mount, Tortorici. Tvndall and Lieutenant Hall
deny being present when the statement was made and deny every
hearing the statement.
Pellegrino denies making the statement.
There is sufficient evidence that a statement similar to "Howard
Schrieber is whose father?" was written on a chalk board in the
O.I.S. office. The investigation also established that Howard
Schrieber is listed on Ramirez' birth certificate as his father.
Ramirez is supported by civilian witness Diethrich that
Pellegrino made a improper remark to Pellegrino. Although
Ramirez alleges that the statement was made in front of tf*l* ^
entire section, all other detectives deny hearing the remark.
The source of the writing on the black board was not resolved.
It is recommended that Count No. 11 be classified as SUSTAINED
against Pellegrino.
COUNT NO. 12 The Department alleges that sometime in February
1988, Lieutenant Hall failed to take appropriate action after he
knew or should have known that one of his subordinates had
directed an improper remark toward another subordinate.
Ramirez alleged that Lieutenant Hall was present when
Pellegrino made the improper remark. (Count No. 11)
Diethrich recalls hearing the improper remark but does not
remember Hall being present.
All other section members refute the allegation.
Lieutenant Hall denies the allegation.
There are no witnesses to support the allegation. Diethrich
cannot remember Lieutenant Hall being present when Pellegrino
made the remark. The lack of support for the allegation and
Lieutenant Hall's denial leave this count unresolved.
It is recommended that Count No. 12 be NOT SUSTAINED against
Lieutenant Hall.
COUNT NO. 13 The Department alleges that on May 24, 1988, at
approximately 1515 hours, Detective Pellegrino, while on duty,
unnecessarily became involved in a physical altercation with
Ramirez.
Object Description
| Title | Correspondence: complaints against LAPD (2 of 2), 1989-04-17 |
| Description | Los Angeles Police Department personnel complaint, 1989 April 17, against Elmer Pellegrino, John Tortorici, Carlos Ramirez, Charles Massey, Wallace Montgomery and William Hall. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. |
| Coverage date | 1981/1989 |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
| Date created | 1989-04-17 |
| Type | texts |
| Format | 26 p. |
| Format (aat) | personnel records |
| Format (imt) | application/pdf |
| Language | English |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
| Series | Independent Commission File List |
| File | Complaints, suggestions, and support |
| Box and folder | box 23, folder 6 |
| Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
| Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
| Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
| Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Filename | indep-box23-06 |
Description
| Title | Correspondence: complaints against LAPD (2 of 2), 1989-04-17, p. 8 |
| Format (imt) | image/tiff |
| Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
| Full text | Personnel Complaint Page 7 8.2 Diethrich 'supports Ramirez. She heard Pellegrino state something to the effect of "Chico wants to be a Mexican but he is a Jew." . Payne, Watts, G. Hall, Holcomb, Karlson, Michelena. Montgomery, Mount, Tortorici. Tvndall and Lieutenant Hall deny being present when the statement was made and deny every hearing the statement. Pellegrino denies making the statement. There is sufficient evidence that a statement similar to "Howard Schrieber is whose father?" was written on a chalk board in the O.I.S. office. The investigation also established that Howard Schrieber is listed on Ramirez' birth certificate as his father. Ramirez is supported by civilian witness Diethrich that Pellegrino made a improper remark to Pellegrino. Although Ramirez alleges that the statement was made in front of tf*l* ^ entire section, all other detectives deny hearing the remark. The source of the writing on the black board was not resolved. It is recommended that Count No. 11 be classified as SUSTAINED against Pellegrino. COUNT NO. 12 The Department alleges that sometime in February 1988, Lieutenant Hall failed to take appropriate action after he knew or should have known that one of his subordinates had directed an improper remark toward another subordinate. Ramirez alleged that Lieutenant Hall was present when Pellegrino made the improper remark. (Count No. 11) Diethrich recalls hearing the improper remark but does not remember Hall being present. All other section members refute the allegation. Lieutenant Hall denies the allegation. There are no witnesses to support the allegation. Diethrich cannot remember Lieutenant Hall being present when Pellegrino made the remark. The lack of support for the allegation and Lieutenant Hall's denial leave this count unresolved. It is recommended that Count No. 12 be NOT SUSTAINED against Lieutenant Hall. COUNT NO. 13 The Department alleges that on May 24, 1988, at approximately 1515 hours, Detective Pellegrino, while on duty, unnecessarily became involved in a physical altercation with Ramirez. |
| Filename | indep-box23-06~08.tif |
| Archival file | Volume75/indep-box23-06~08.tif |
