The progressives and the police, 1973, p. 469 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 469 of 669 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
1 aa to tha apeaker'a sincerity. Indeed, some evidence exists thet parker deliberately used court decieione to direct blame for crime con- dltione away from tha police, but hie behevior in other areas remdned entirely conelatent vlth hia position thet crime end court decieione aeeiated the communlat plan to take over America. The chief vigorously oppoeed the idea that private acta by consenting eddt homosexuals be considered outalde police jurisdiction, to the extent that Assemblyman Gordon Winton threatened him with forcible expdelon from the criminal procedure committee hearing room. Diacueelng s demonstration by the Women Strike for Peece, before the women'e dvielon of the Chamber of Commerce, he erated his belief thet "this 'demonstration for peece' hed been well noted in the Kredin and they ere heppy about the whole move- -at.-7' Inevitably, then, the LAPD intelligence dvision personnel became aelf-defined sntlcommunist experts, collecting Information and compiling dossiers on dleged redcds. The "professional" police depertment, though free of the control once exerted by the Chamber of Commerce, continued to do its work in the tradtion of James E. Davis, W. "Red" Hynes, and Earl E. Kynette. unfortunately, the police utilized extremely broad definitions of radical, communist, and subversive. They found such people everywhere, especially In the developing civil rights movement. William Parker, devout Christian and police professional, was dso a devout white man. Or so Negroes, Mexican-Americans and white liberals believed. Allegations concerning Chief Parker's reactionary redd sentiments drcdated early in his term and grew with the years. 455
Object Description
Title | The progressives and the police, 1973 |
Description | Joseph Gerald Woods. The progressives and the police: urban reformers and the professionalization of the Los Angeles police. University of California, Los Angeles (Ph.D., history), 1973. Published by University Microfilms International (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA), 1982. PART OF A SERIES: A critical component of the Commission's investigation centered on the idea that governance of the LAPD was shared between the Office of the Chief of Police, an administrative body, and the Board of Police Commissioners, a citizen body. To better understand the dynamic between these two entities, the staff of Heller, Ehrman, White, & McAuliffe researched the history of the Los Angeles City Charter, focusing primarily on its provisions regarding the distribution of power and the structure and organization of the LAPD. Included in the series are reproductions of reports, dissertations, article clippings, excerpts from city documents, and charter amendments related to the charter's conception and development over time. The series also includes several summaries of expert witness interviews regarding the effectiveness of this structure. |
Creator | Woods, Joseph Gerald, 1930- |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of California, Los Angeles; University Microfilms |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California, USA; Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California |
Date issued | 1973; 1982 |
Type | texts |
Format | 669 p. |
Format (aat) |
doctoral dissertations catalog cards |
Format (imt) | application/pdf |
Language | English |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Part of collection | Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991 |
Series | Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe |
File | The progressives and the police: urban reformers and the professionalization of the Los Angeles police, by Joseph Gerard Woods, 1973 |
Box and folder | box 20, folder 24; box 21, folders 1-3 |
Provenance | The collection was given to the University of Southern California on July 31, 1991. |
Rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Manuscripts Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained. |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Repository name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
Repository address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
Repository email | specol@dots.usc.edu |
Filename | indep-box20-24 |
Description
Title | The progressives and the police, 1973, p. 469 |
Format (imt) | image/tiff |
Physical access | Contact: Special Collections, Doheny Memorial Library, Libraries, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189; specol@dots.usc.edu |
Full text | 1 aa to tha apeaker'a sincerity. Indeed, some evidence exists thet parker deliberately used court decieione to direct blame for crime con- dltione away from tha police, but hie behevior in other areas remdned entirely conelatent vlth hia position thet crime end court decieione aeeiated the communlat plan to take over America. The chief vigorously oppoeed the idea that private acta by consenting eddt homosexuals be considered outalde police jurisdiction, to the extent that Assemblyman Gordon Winton threatened him with forcible expdelon from the criminal procedure committee hearing room. Diacueelng s demonstration by the Women Strike for Peece, before the women'e dvielon of the Chamber of Commerce, he erated his belief thet "this 'demonstration for peece' hed been well noted in the Kredin and they ere heppy about the whole move- -at.-7' Inevitably, then, the LAPD intelligence dvision personnel became aelf-defined sntlcommunist experts, collecting Information and compiling dossiers on dleged redcds. The "professional" police depertment, though free of the control once exerted by the Chamber of Commerce, continued to do its work in the tradtion of James E. Davis, W. "Red" Hynes, and Earl E. Kynette. unfortunately, the police utilized extremely broad definitions of radical, communist, and subversive. They found such people everywhere, especially In the developing civil rights movement. William Parker, devout Christian and police professional, was dso a devout white man. Or so Negroes, Mexican-Americans and white liberals believed. Allegations concerning Chief Parker's reactionary redd sentiments drcdated early in his term and grew with the years. 455 |
Filename | indep-box21-02-01~106.tif |
Archival file | Volume65/indep-box21-02-01~106.tif |