CENPA-240~03 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 4 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
o
Combatente - 1 - September 30, 1967»
EDITORIAL
THE JlFRICAN HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT IN ...KINSHASA
From 4 to 14 September; 1967, the Congo (Kinshasa) was a host country for African Heads of State, Heads of Government, the United Nations*
Secretary General U Thant, the Representatives of the World Press, Members of the Liberation Movements and other distinguished individuals of
the human societies.
In spite of the threatening dark clouds which are still hanging
around the horizon of the Eastern Province of Bukavu, caused and encouraged by the sinister hands of international imperialism, the Summit-Conf3-
rence had been successful»
Even though the Conference was generally a success, but we strongly feel that the case of our Organisation could have been given a prime
consideration when the Conference delegates were discussing the armed revolutionary struggle* MOZAMBIQUE REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE (COREMO), as a
Party emerged from all Mozambican parties except (PEELIMO), and fighting
inside the country with untold difficulties, we think the OsAoU. Assembly
should have taken a serious view to review its case*
In spite of our strong petition to the Heads of State and Government j the case was deliberately ignored and cooled by the report of the
Executive Secretary of the Committee of Eleven, Mr. G. Mago nibe. COREMO,
as a revolutionary movement,which has been tampered in a bitter armed.revolutionary struggle against the Portuguese fascists and colonialists,
wonders how could Mr* Magombe, a man of great responsibility as he,have
ignored the heroic armed struggle in Mozambique led by Coremo? It is of
no doubt that he has in many occasions received reports of our struggle
ing hard, and not only that "but we are sure Mr. Magombe as an Executive
Secretary of OAU Liberation Committee, has been well informed about our
activities inside the country. We are also sure that he has read confirmations from the Portuguese authorities about our confrontation with their soldiers in the Tete district, and other parts of Mozambique.
In view of this how does the OAU and Mr* G.Magombe expect us to
fight successfully the armed struggle against the well-equipped and combined forces of the Portuguese colonialists? In the Report of the African Liberation Committee whole credit of armed struggle in Mozambique went to Frelimo. We are sure that this is the exact way Mr* Magombe views
the question of our struggle^, Nevertheless we are not disappointed, nor
are we to stop our efforts to intensify the struggle* but all we should
like to request tp/Uommittee of Eleven is to present facts, real facts
of the situation in Mozambique. In this connection, we pointed out in
our document presented to the OAU Assembly in Kinshasa, that we welcome
observers to go to see our fronts in Mozambique© Vie did so, because we
(Continued on page 14)
Á
Object Description
Description
| Title | CENPA-240~03 |
| Filename | CENPA-240~03.tiff |
| Full text | o Combatente - 1 - September 30, 1967» EDITORIAL THE JlFRICAN HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT IN ...KINSHASA From 4 to 14 September; 1967, the Congo (Kinshasa) was a host country for African Heads of State, Heads of Government, the United Nations* Secretary General U Thant, the Representatives of the World Press, Members of the Liberation Movements and other distinguished individuals of the human societies. In spite of the threatening dark clouds which are still hanging around the horizon of the Eastern Province of Bukavu, caused and encouraged by the sinister hands of international imperialism, the Summit-Conf3- rence had been successful» Even though the Conference was generally a success, but we strongly feel that the case of our Organisation could have been given a prime consideration when the Conference delegates were discussing the armed revolutionary struggle* MOZAMBIQUE REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE (COREMO), as a Party emerged from all Mozambican parties except (PEELIMO), and fighting inside the country with untold difficulties, we think the OsAoU. Assembly should have taken a serious view to review its case* In spite of our strong petition to the Heads of State and Government j the case was deliberately ignored and cooled by the report of the Executive Secretary of the Committee of Eleven, Mr. G. Mago nibe. COREMO, as a revolutionary movement,which has been tampered in a bitter armed.revolutionary struggle against the Portuguese fascists and colonialists, wonders how could Mr* Magombe, a man of great responsibility as he,have ignored the heroic armed struggle in Mozambique led by Coremo? It is of no doubt that he has in many occasions received reports of our struggle ing hard, and not only that "but we are sure Mr. Magombe as an Executive Secretary of OAU Liberation Committee, has been well informed about our activities inside the country. We are also sure that he has read confirmations from the Portuguese authorities about our confrontation with their soldiers in the Tete district, and other parts of Mozambique. In view of this how does the OAU and Mr* G.Magombe expect us to fight successfully the armed struggle against the well-equipped and combined forces of the Portuguese colonialists? In the Report of the African Liberation Committee whole credit of armed struggle in Mozambique went to Frelimo. We are sure that this is the exact way Mr* Magombe views the question of our struggle^, Nevertheless we are not disappointed, nor are we to stop our efforts to intensify the struggle* but all we should like to request tp/Uommittee of Eleven is to present facts, real facts of the situation in Mozambique. In this connection, we pointed out in our document presented to the OAU Assembly in Kinshasa, that we welcome observers to go to see our fronts in Mozambique© Vie did so, because we (Continued on page 14) Á |
| Archival file | Volume26/CENPA-240~03.tiff |
