CENPA-357~06 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 6 of 27 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
1 ! I IK *-- ALUANCC l^*j } CAETANO GET OUT! IWbwional OPPOSITION IN BRITAIN TO THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE CELEBRATIONS Over the past few months the British and Portuguese governments have been staging celebrations to mark the 600th anniversary of their ((oldest alliance)), based on a treaty signed on June 16th, 1373. But these celebrations have been countered by a nation-wide ((End the Alliance)) campaign mounted by the Committee for Freedom in Mozambique, Angola and Guine, which in conjunction with a broad spectrum of political and student groups, took the initiative in making the anniversary an occasion for raising understanding of the situation in Africa and mobilising protest against the official backing given by British and other western governments for Portuguese oppression. One of the focal points of the campaign was the three-day visit to Portugal by the Duke of Edinburgh from 5 to 8 of June. Many of his public engagements in Britain prior to the visit were picketed by demonstrators. When the Duke spoke to the demonstrators he said that it was a Foreign Office decision that he should go to Portugal. Letters of protest to the Foreign Office received the reply that the visit was ((ceremonial in character, intended to recognise the achievement of two countries in maintaining friendly relations over a remarkably long stretch of time. It should not be seen as an endorsement of Portugal's policies in Africa, since those policies have been a matter of open and acknowledged disagreement between the British and Portuguese governments for some time.)) The Portuguese government on the other hand, obviously saw the visit as a sign of Britains' blanket endorsement of Portuguese policy. The Duke's contacts in Portugal were kept to the lowest official circles apart from a highly significant visit to the new Plessey factory. Allegedly the most modern of its kind in western Europe, the factory makes communications and computer equipment for export, including an exclusive concession to supply the colonies and the armed forces. At a time when Plessey is closing down its installations in Britain, this new factory is a vivid example both of the covert military collaboration between Portugal and its allies and also of the way in which Portugal is being used an as instrument of the richer western powers. Other aspects of the celebrations had a markedly militarist character — the visit of two Navy frigates to Lisbon, air displays by the Royal Air Force, «Red Arrows)) team, and participation by the Portuguese National Guard in the Royal Tournament. Sensitive to Britain's relations with independent African countries, the British Government played down the Duke's visit. Moreover, the advance text of one of his speeches pointed to differences between Portuguese and British colonial policies. However, this was withdrawn after Portuguese protest.
Object Description
Title | Mozambique revolution, no. 55 (1973 Apr,-June) |
Description | Contents: Editorial - International solidarity (p. 1); Italian conference of solidarity (p. 3); Caetano get out! (p. 4); The O.U.A. 10th anniversary (p. 5); The president's visit to Soviet Union and Romania (p. 7); We must learn from the spirit of your struggle (p. 8); A trip to the Zambezi (p. 9); FRELIMO is in full control (p.11); War communique (p.12); Tackling the problems in our schools (p.15); The struggle to build a healthy Mozambique (p.17); The Josina Marchel orphanage (p. 20); Wiriyamu: Not an isolated crime (p. 23). This is an issue reprinted and distributed by the LSM Information Center in Richmond, Canada. |
Subject (lcsh) |
Nationalism -- Mozambique Self-determination, National Mozambique -- History Portugal -- Politics and government -- 1933-1974 |
Geographic Subject (Country) | Mozambique |
Geographic Subject (Continent) | Africa |
Geographic Coordinates | -18.6696821,35.5273477 |
Coverage date | 1373/1973-03 |
Creator | Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO) |
Publisher (of the Original Version) | Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO). Department of Information |
Place of Publication (of the Origianal Version) | Dar Es Salaam, U.R. of Tanzania |
Publisher (of the Digital Version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Date issued | 1973-04/1973-06 |
Type |
texts images |
Format | 26 p. |
Format (aat) | newsletters |
Language | English |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Part of collection | Emerging Nationalism in Portuguese Africa, 1959-1965 |
Part of subcollection | Mozambique Collection |
Rights | The University of Southern California has licensed the rights to this material from the Aluka initiative of Ithaka Harbors, Inc., a non-profit Delaware corporation whose address is 151 East 61st Street, New York, NY 10021 |
Physical access | Original archive is at the Boeckmann Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies. Send requests to address or e-mail given. Phone (213) 821-2366; fax (213) 740-2343. |
Repository Name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
Repository Address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
Repository Email | specol@usc.edu |
Filename | CENPA-357 |
Description
Title | CENPA-357~06 |
Filename | CENPA-357~06.tiff |
Full text | 1 ! I IK *-- ALUANCC l^*j } CAETANO GET OUT! IWbwional OPPOSITION IN BRITAIN TO THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE CELEBRATIONS Over the past few months the British and Portuguese governments have been staging celebrations to mark the 600th anniversary of their ((oldest alliance)), based on a treaty signed on June 16th, 1373. But these celebrations have been countered by a nation-wide ((End the Alliance)) campaign mounted by the Committee for Freedom in Mozambique, Angola and Guine, which in conjunction with a broad spectrum of political and student groups, took the initiative in making the anniversary an occasion for raising understanding of the situation in Africa and mobilising protest against the official backing given by British and other western governments for Portuguese oppression. One of the focal points of the campaign was the three-day visit to Portugal by the Duke of Edinburgh from 5 to 8 of June. Many of his public engagements in Britain prior to the visit were picketed by demonstrators. When the Duke spoke to the demonstrators he said that it was a Foreign Office decision that he should go to Portugal. Letters of protest to the Foreign Office received the reply that the visit was ((ceremonial in character, intended to recognise the achievement of two countries in maintaining friendly relations over a remarkably long stretch of time. It should not be seen as an endorsement of Portugal's policies in Africa, since those policies have been a matter of open and acknowledged disagreement between the British and Portuguese governments for some time.)) The Portuguese government on the other hand, obviously saw the visit as a sign of Britains' blanket endorsement of Portuguese policy. The Duke's contacts in Portugal were kept to the lowest official circles apart from a highly significant visit to the new Plessey factory. Allegedly the most modern of its kind in western Europe, the factory makes communications and computer equipment for export, including an exclusive concession to supply the colonies and the armed forces. At a time when Plessey is closing down its installations in Britain, this new factory is a vivid example both of the covert military collaboration between Portugal and its allies and also of the way in which Portugal is being used an as instrument of the richer western powers. Other aspects of the celebrations had a markedly militarist character — the visit of two Navy frigates to Lisbon, air displays by the Royal Air Force, «Red Arrows)) team, and participation by the Portuguese National Guard in the Royal Tournament. Sensitive to Britain's relations with independent African countries, the British Government played down the Duke's visit. Moreover, the advance text of one of his speeches pointed to differences between Portuguese and British colonial policies. However, this was withdrawn after Portuguese protest. |
Archival file | Volume24/CENPA-357~06.tiff |