CENPA-347~10 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 10 of 29 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Cahora Bassa Dam, will have negative implications for the Angolan people. What exactly is the objective of the enemy in building the Cunene Dam and what has been the action of the MPLA to prevent it. A: The Cunene project is part of a complex of projects which Portugal, South Africa and Rhodesia are undertaking in the Southern part of our continent in order to achieve their objectives of exploitation of the peoples of different countries and the domination of that part of Africa. Like the Cahora Bassa Project, the Portuguese are intending to build along the river Cunene a series of dams in order to create conditions for immigration to the areas which are along the shores of the river, not only from Angola, but also from South West Africa. They also want these dams to provide power for their industries and especially for the mines of Tsume in Namibia. The Cunene is a river which borders Namibia and Angola. It is a river which rises up to Nova Lisboa where it has its source, and in that whole area, the Portuguese aim at establishing colonialists, not only Portuguese settlers, but also South African and other nationalities. We heard recently that some Italians wanted to settle in that area to grow bananas. This kind of settlement in Angola and Mozambique and in particular the association with South Africa reveals a political tendency to transform Angola, to transform Mozambique into new South Africas where power will be in the hands of white minorities who will continue to oppress our peoples. The Portuguese government is naturally trying a series of solutions for the problem of Angola and Mozambique. I think they have not yet reached what they can consider a "proper" solution, so meanwhile they are studying ways to strengthen their position. Building of dams fits into that kind of plan as well as the building of roads. For example, a road which is being built from Luanda to Pretoria has clearly a strategic purpose. This is to link the two countries more closely so that the colonialists and the racists of Southern Africa can help each other more easily against the peoples of Angola, Rhodesia South Africa and Mozambique. We think, therefore, that all the activity which FRELIMO has been undertaking to fight the Cahora Bassa Project is just and we have praised the great results achieved by you internationally with the withdrawal of companies and capital involved in the building of the dam. This represents an important diplomatic victory. It also means an important defeat for those who plan to build the dam. We have praised your efforts to stop its construction and we are absolutely certain that this Cahora Bassa project, as the late President of FRELIMO, Comrade Eduardo Mondlane said, is a project which is doomed and must be fought by the whole world. The power of mobilisation of FRELIMO in this respect has been really great and we hope it will continue to bear fruit so that the Portuguese will be deprived of one more instrument for the repression of the Mozambican people. In Angola we shall act in the same way, the most correct way, but we have not yet organised a similar campaign to FRELIMO in the diplomatic field. We still have not paid enough attention to the problem of the Cunene Dam, it is even little known in the world outside. It is being built in silence, but this is because of other preoccupations we have had until now, preoccupations of political and military nature, which have demanded our energy and our attention, so for the moment we do not consider it the main objective of our struggle, of our present tactics, to make a frontline attack against the Cunene Dam. But of course, we shall fight against its construction, certainly the colonialists (some of whom are already there) will be forced to leave, and I am absolutely sure that our cannon and mortar shells will not let those individuals who come to exploit our people, remain on the land as owners, as capitalists who do not want anything but to fill their pockets at the cost of the blood and sweat of the African people. Q: The Portuguese colonialists have recently intensified the use of herbicides against the zones controlled by the MPLA. What are the effects of these barbaric actions? This certainly corresponds to a new phase of the war, a desperate measure of the Portuguese government similar to what the Americans are doing in Vietnam. A: The use of herbicides goes back as far as 1962. They did not just start using herbicides now in the northern front. In the districts of Cuanza North and Luanda the herbicides have often been used since 1962, 1963, 1964 in particular to destroy the cassava and deprive the populations in the liberated areas, and thus force them to return to the Portuguese control. However, after 1970, this action was intensified - vast areas of the Eastern region were also affected by herbicides entailing particular damage, because the herbicides affect our basic food-stuff - cassava, and one cannot plant and grow crops of cassava in a short time. When using this tactic I think the Portuguese colonialist government believes that by creating more difficulties for the people they will surrender in order to live better. On the other hand they also consider that without the people the guerrillas cannot fight. This is the main reason why the enemy uses herbicides. There is no doubt that they have destroyed vast areas of land but their calculations were not correct, for they did not consider certain other factors. First of all they didn't take into account the determination of the people to fight, whatever the difficulties, until independence. They didn't expect the leadership's decision to do everything so that this use of herbicides would not cause too extensive damage, could not harm the struggle. They didn't consider the counter measures which we took so that there would be no food shortages. They did not anticipate the international solidarity which played a crucial role in ensuring that the populations of the affected areas continued to have food and did not suffer hunger. In fact, on this point, I must say that several countries in the world offered food for the areas affected by herbicides, which represents a new victory for our movement and for all liberation movements, and a severe blow to Portuguese policy. They thought about depriving us of the vital supplies for the guerrillas in the areas where they have no control. But on the contrary it was noticed that these conditions increased and improved thanks to international solidarity. When they decided to halt the guerrillas with their planes and herbicides a general movement of sympathy with the people who suffered this inhuman attack started throughout the world. Even in the UN (where there is still a majority which does not allow that organisation to act within the spirit of the 1960 Declaration of Independence of the Colonised Peoples) we saw a movement of sympathy for our people, particularly in the specialised agencies like FAO, UNESCO, WHO. They are giving support to the liberated areas so that the effects of the herbicides will be lessened. That means that Portugal suffered yet another defeat when she used that weapon, a defeat which was inflicted both by our people and also by all the peoples of the world. And what she thought would be a means of oppression, of demoralisation of our people, became instead a means of encouragement, because we saw we had friends throughout the world and we saw that we could rebuild what was destroyed by the Portuguese. This world response helps us even more, to reiterate and support with all 8
Object Description
Title | Mozambique revolution, no. 49 (1971 Oct.-Dec.) |
Description | Contents: Editorial - FRELIMO's visit to socialist Asia (p. 1); War communique - A military report (p. 3); Angola: Facets of the freedom struggle - An interview with MPLA's president (p. 5); The growth of a new culture - FRELIMO at a Unesco seminar (p.10); Images of the visit to the socialist Asia (p.12); Our internationalist duty (p.14); Visitors in free Mozambique - Comments on FRELIMO's activities by foreigners (p.15); Sowing the seeds of liberation - Directives issued by FRELIMO's president for the new production cycle (p. 20). |
Subject (lcsh) |
Nationalism -- Mozambique Self-determination, National Mozambique -- History Portugal -- Politics and government -- 1933-1974 |
Geographic Subject (Country) | Mozambique |
Geographic Subject (Continent) | Africa |
Geographic Coordinates | -18.6696821,35.5273467 |
Coverage date | 1960/1971-10 |
Creator | Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO) |
Publisher (of the Original Version) | Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO). Department of Information |
Place of Publication (of the Origianal Version) | Dar Es Salaam, U.R. of Tanzania |
Publisher (of the Digital Version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Date issued | 1971-10/1971-12 |
Type |
texts images |
Format | 28 p. |
Format (aat) | newsletters |
Language | English |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Part of collection | Emerging Nationalism in Portuguese Africa, 1959-1965 |
Part of subcollection | Mozambique Collection |
Rights | The University of Southern California has licensed the rights to this material from the Aluka initiative of Ithaka Harbors, Inc., a non-profit Delaware corporation whose address is 151 East 61st Street, New York, NY 10021 |
Physical access | Original archive is at the Boeckmann Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies. Send requests to address or e-mail given. Phone (213) 821-2366; fax (213) 740-2343. |
Repository Name | USC Libraries Special Collections |
Repository Address | Doheny Memorial Library, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0189 |
Repository Email | specol@usc.edu |
Filename | CENPA-347 |
Description
Title | CENPA-347~10 |
Filename | CENPA-347~10.tiff |
Full text | Cahora Bassa Dam, will have negative implications for the Angolan people. What exactly is the objective of the enemy in building the Cunene Dam and what has been the action of the MPLA to prevent it. A: The Cunene project is part of a complex of projects which Portugal, South Africa and Rhodesia are undertaking in the Southern part of our continent in order to achieve their objectives of exploitation of the peoples of different countries and the domination of that part of Africa. Like the Cahora Bassa Project, the Portuguese are intending to build along the river Cunene a series of dams in order to create conditions for immigration to the areas which are along the shores of the river, not only from Angola, but also from South West Africa. They also want these dams to provide power for their industries and especially for the mines of Tsume in Namibia. The Cunene is a river which borders Namibia and Angola. It is a river which rises up to Nova Lisboa where it has its source, and in that whole area, the Portuguese aim at establishing colonialists, not only Portuguese settlers, but also South African and other nationalities. We heard recently that some Italians wanted to settle in that area to grow bananas. This kind of settlement in Angola and Mozambique and in particular the association with South Africa reveals a political tendency to transform Angola, to transform Mozambique into new South Africas where power will be in the hands of white minorities who will continue to oppress our peoples. The Portuguese government is naturally trying a series of solutions for the problem of Angola and Mozambique. I think they have not yet reached what they can consider a "proper" solution, so meanwhile they are studying ways to strengthen their position. Building of dams fits into that kind of plan as well as the building of roads. For example, a road which is being built from Luanda to Pretoria has clearly a strategic purpose. This is to link the two countries more closely so that the colonialists and the racists of Southern Africa can help each other more easily against the peoples of Angola, Rhodesia South Africa and Mozambique. We think, therefore, that all the activity which FRELIMO has been undertaking to fight the Cahora Bassa Project is just and we have praised the great results achieved by you internationally with the withdrawal of companies and capital involved in the building of the dam. This represents an important diplomatic victory. It also means an important defeat for those who plan to build the dam. We have praised your efforts to stop its construction and we are absolutely certain that this Cahora Bassa project, as the late President of FRELIMO, Comrade Eduardo Mondlane said, is a project which is doomed and must be fought by the whole world. The power of mobilisation of FRELIMO in this respect has been really great and we hope it will continue to bear fruit so that the Portuguese will be deprived of one more instrument for the repression of the Mozambican people. In Angola we shall act in the same way, the most correct way, but we have not yet organised a similar campaign to FRELIMO in the diplomatic field. We still have not paid enough attention to the problem of the Cunene Dam, it is even little known in the world outside. It is being built in silence, but this is because of other preoccupations we have had until now, preoccupations of political and military nature, which have demanded our energy and our attention, so for the moment we do not consider it the main objective of our struggle, of our present tactics, to make a frontline attack against the Cunene Dam. But of course, we shall fight against its construction, certainly the colonialists (some of whom are already there) will be forced to leave, and I am absolutely sure that our cannon and mortar shells will not let those individuals who come to exploit our people, remain on the land as owners, as capitalists who do not want anything but to fill their pockets at the cost of the blood and sweat of the African people. Q: The Portuguese colonialists have recently intensified the use of herbicides against the zones controlled by the MPLA. What are the effects of these barbaric actions? This certainly corresponds to a new phase of the war, a desperate measure of the Portuguese government similar to what the Americans are doing in Vietnam. A: The use of herbicides goes back as far as 1962. They did not just start using herbicides now in the northern front. In the districts of Cuanza North and Luanda the herbicides have often been used since 1962, 1963, 1964 in particular to destroy the cassava and deprive the populations in the liberated areas, and thus force them to return to the Portuguese control. However, after 1970, this action was intensified - vast areas of the Eastern region were also affected by herbicides entailing particular damage, because the herbicides affect our basic food-stuff - cassava, and one cannot plant and grow crops of cassava in a short time. When using this tactic I think the Portuguese colonialist government believes that by creating more difficulties for the people they will surrender in order to live better. On the other hand they also consider that without the people the guerrillas cannot fight. This is the main reason why the enemy uses herbicides. There is no doubt that they have destroyed vast areas of land but their calculations were not correct, for they did not consider certain other factors. First of all they didn't take into account the determination of the people to fight, whatever the difficulties, until independence. They didn't expect the leadership's decision to do everything so that this use of herbicides would not cause too extensive damage, could not harm the struggle. They didn't consider the counter measures which we took so that there would be no food shortages. They did not anticipate the international solidarity which played a crucial role in ensuring that the populations of the affected areas continued to have food and did not suffer hunger. In fact, on this point, I must say that several countries in the world offered food for the areas affected by herbicides, which represents a new victory for our movement and for all liberation movements, and a severe blow to Portuguese policy. They thought about depriving us of the vital supplies for the guerrillas in the areas where they have no control. But on the contrary it was noticed that these conditions increased and improved thanks to international solidarity. When they decided to halt the guerrillas with their planes and herbicides a general movement of sympathy with the people who suffered this inhuman attack started throughout the world. Even in the UN (where there is still a majority which does not allow that organisation to act within the spirit of the 1960 Declaration of Independence of the Colonised Peoples) we saw a movement of sympathy for our people, particularly in the specialised agencies like FAO, UNESCO, WHO. They are giving support to the liberated areas so that the effects of the herbicides will be lessened. That means that Portugal suffered yet another defeat when she used that weapon, a defeat which was inflicted both by our people and also by all the peoples of the world. And what she thought would be a means of oppression, of demoralisation of our people, became instead a means of encouragement, because we saw we had friends throughout the world and we saw that we could rebuild what was destroyed by the Portuguese. This world response helps us even more, to reiterate and support with all 8 |
Archival file | Volume22/CENPA-347~10.tiff |