CENPA-028~06 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 6 of 17 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
Portuga I & E FT A EXTRACTS FROM A DEBATE IN THE SWEDISH PARLIAMENT 2nd MARCH 1967 Mr. Almark (a liberal M.P.) : It is quite clear that the rapid increase in trade and foreign investment in Portugal, which has been stimulated by the consequences of EFTA cooperation, has contributed to the economic development of Portugal and thus an ever increasing amount of money can be used for the war in Africa. Mr. Lanqe (minister for commerce):How far this economic progress has influenced the Portuguese policy in Africa .... is not easily estimated. In this connection attention should be paid to the argument that there are reasons to beleive that economic progress and a higher standard of living promote a process of democratic liberation. Mr. AlmarksPortuoal is becoming over more dependent on trade with other EFTA memebere. Thus passiveness in the EFTA cannot be excused by possible activity in the U.N.It must be the task of our country, in all situations where it is possible, to do so to raise the problem of the possibility of bringing to an end the tragedy in the African colonies of Portugal. Today we contribute to prolonging it Mr* Lanqe : Inside organisations with commercial and other similar aims like the EFTft or the GATT, there are neither political qualifications nor formal possibilities to carry out the kind of measure the interpellator is hinting at. The connection between NATO and the Portuguese colonial wars is a fairly obvious one and has frequently been stated. EFTA is the other organisation which formally links Portugal with a part of Western Europe. As an organisation primarily concerned with economic relations the influence of EFTA on Portugal's African policy is less clearly defined and it is rare to see it plainly stated as in the above extracts of Mr. Almark's speach. The first objective of EFTA is "to promote in the area of the association and in each Member State a sustained expansion of economic activity". The argument about Portugal, therefore hinges on the question of whether EFTA is making a substantial contribution to economic expansion in t the case of Portugal, and whether such expansion will tend to perpetuate Portuguese aggression in Africa. EFTA is certainly important for the Portuguese economy. In 1965 36^ of all Portuguese exports went to EFTA countries. In 1966 the Financial Times stated: "There is no doubt that Portugal has benefitted enormously from her membership of EFTA and will continue to do so.". All Western Europe, however, is important for Portugal: her trade in general has a heavy bias towards Europe, with W. Germany, a non EFTA country, and Britain, an EFTA member, running each other very close as the largest importers and exporters, while the United States comes only a near third. It is important, therefore, to pinpoint the exact role that EFTA does play.
Object Description
Description
Title | CENPA-028~06 |
Filename | CENPA-028~06.tiff |
Full text | Portuga I & E FT A EXTRACTS FROM A DEBATE IN THE SWEDISH PARLIAMENT 2nd MARCH 1967 Mr. Almark (a liberal M.P.) : It is quite clear that the rapid increase in trade and foreign investment in Portugal, which has been stimulated by the consequences of EFTA cooperation, has contributed to the economic development of Portugal and thus an ever increasing amount of money can be used for the war in Africa. Mr. Lanqe (minister for commerce):How far this economic progress has influenced the Portuguese policy in Africa .... is not easily estimated. In this connection attention should be paid to the argument that there are reasons to beleive that economic progress and a higher standard of living promote a process of democratic liberation. Mr. AlmarksPortuoal is becoming over more dependent on trade with other EFTA memebere. Thus passiveness in the EFTA cannot be excused by possible activity in the U.N.It must be the task of our country, in all situations where it is possible, to do so to raise the problem of the possibility of bringing to an end the tragedy in the African colonies of Portugal. Today we contribute to prolonging it Mr* Lanqe : Inside organisations with commercial and other similar aims like the EFTft or the GATT, there are neither political qualifications nor formal possibilities to carry out the kind of measure the interpellator is hinting at. The connection between NATO and the Portuguese colonial wars is a fairly obvious one and has frequently been stated. EFTA is the other organisation which formally links Portugal with a part of Western Europe. As an organisation primarily concerned with economic relations the influence of EFTA on Portugal's African policy is less clearly defined and it is rare to see it plainly stated as in the above extracts of Mr. Almark's speach. The first objective of EFTA is "to promote in the area of the association and in each Member State a sustained expansion of economic activity". The argument about Portugal, therefore hinges on the question of whether EFTA is making a substantial contribution to economic expansion in t the case of Portugal, and whether such expansion will tend to perpetuate Portuguese aggression in Africa. EFTA is certainly important for the Portuguese economy. In 1965 36^ of all Portuguese exports went to EFTA countries. In 1966 the Financial Times stated: "There is no doubt that Portugal has benefitted enormously from her membership of EFTA and will continue to do so.". All Western Europe, however, is important for Portugal: her trade in general has a heavy bias towards Europe, with W. Germany, a non EFTA country, and Britain, an EFTA member, running each other very close as the largest importers and exporters, while the United States comes only a near third. It is important, therefore, to pinpoint the exact role that EFTA does play. |
Archival file | Volume3/CENPA-028~06.tiff |