CENPA-027~10 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 10 of 43 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
a situation similar to Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence. There is, however, only a very limited possibility of bringing about this situation. For, whereas in Rhodesia the white settlers could count on support from England when they declared independence, and possessed all the material means (including military) to establish their independence, the settlers in Mozambique find themselves in a very different position. Portugal (unlike England) needs the colonies for her own survival. The very existence of Portugal in its present phase, depends on the colonies. Therefore Portugal will oppose any action from any quarter which would result in her losing the revenue provided by the colonies. Thus the Portuguese Government would actually use her vaste army to oppose any movement for independence among the white settlers. The existence of the national liberation struggle is another factor which acts against this tendency of the settlers. Even though, let us suppose, they obtained independence, they would be deprived of the military means of repression which Portugal provides. They would then, be forced to appeal, for example, to South Africa, who would send her troops in to occupy Mozambique. A bond of dependence would then be established between this regime and South Africa. The situation then pertaining would to all intents and purposes be the same - independence in relation to Portugal, but dependence in relation to South Africa. The settlers in Mozambique know this. That is why they do nothing to make anything concrete coma out of this tendency: it remains a matter of vague aspirations. c) A third body of opinion is for a neo-colonialist position, in which Portugal would grant independence to Mozambique, using a group of African puppet leaders, manipulated by the Lisbon authorities. The representatives of this movement are in Lisbon and constitute the so-called "legal opposition" to the Salazar regime. Their leader is a Portuguese politician called CUNHA LEAL. But the neo-colonialist solution presupposes that the colonial power is sufficiently developed industrially to be able to make use of the raw materials which the neo-colony would provide her with. As Portugal is one of the most backward countries in Europe she needs, in order to exploit a territory, to have at the same time political and economic control. This is why the neo-colonialist tendency is also inaplicable.
Object Description
Description
Title | CENPA-027~10 |
Filename | CENPA-027~10.tiff |
Full text | a situation similar to Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence. There is, however, only a very limited possibility of bringing about this situation. For, whereas in Rhodesia the white settlers could count on support from England when they declared independence, and possessed all the material means (including military) to establish their independence, the settlers in Mozambique find themselves in a very different position. Portugal (unlike England) needs the colonies for her own survival. The very existence of Portugal in its present phase, depends on the colonies. Therefore Portugal will oppose any action from any quarter which would result in her losing the revenue provided by the colonies. Thus the Portuguese Government would actually use her vaste army to oppose any movement for independence among the white settlers. The existence of the national liberation struggle is another factor which acts against this tendency of the settlers. Even though, let us suppose, they obtained independence, they would be deprived of the military means of repression which Portugal provides. They would then, be forced to appeal, for example, to South Africa, who would send her troops in to occupy Mozambique. A bond of dependence would then be established between this regime and South Africa. The situation then pertaining would to all intents and purposes be the same - independence in relation to Portugal, but dependence in relation to South Africa. The settlers in Mozambique know this. That is why they do nothing to make anything concrete coma out of this tendency: it remains a matter of vague aspirations. c) A third body of opinion is for a neo-colonialist position, in which Portugal would grant independence to Mozambique, using a group of African puppet leaders, manipulated by the Lisbon authorities. The representatives of this movement are in Lisbon and constitute the so-called "legal opposition" to the Salazar regime. Their leader is a Portuguese politician called CUNHA LEAL. But the neo-colonialist solution presupposes that the colonial power is sufficiently developed industrially to be able to make use of the raw materials which the neo-colony would provide her with. As Portugal is one of the most backward countries in Europe she needs, in order to exploit a territory, to have at the same time political and economic control. This is why the neo-colonialist tendency is also inaplicable. |
Archival file | Volume2/CENPA-027~10.tiff |