An analytical study of the physical distribution of population in Los Angeles County, 1946-1956. - Page 37 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 37 of 151 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
24 TiBLE III LOS ANGELES GOÎJNTY PER CENT ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE OF POPULATION VERSUS DISTANCE FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, 1954-1956*, BY QUADRANTS Segment (distance from Central Business D is tric t) Per Cent Annual Rate of Change of Population Quadrant I Quadrant I I Quadrant ! I I I Quadrant 17 Four Quadrants Combined 0 to 2 Mile - 1.5 - 2.0 - 2.5 - 1.5 - 2.0 2 to 4 Mile - 1.5 - .5 - .5 - .5 - .75 4 to 6 Mile + .5 - + .125 - .125 + .25 6 to 8 Mile + 2.5 - .125 + 2.25 + 1.0 + 1.375 8 to 10 Mile + 2.0 + 1.75 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 2.5 10 to 12 Mile + 2.0 + 3.5** + 4.75 + 6.0 + 4.0 12 to 14 Mile + 3.0 + 5.0 + 5.5 + 6.0 + 5.0 1 *Notes The period 1954-1956 was used, with few exceptions, to compute the trend per cent because i t would more nearly show the current rate of change of population. iI **Trend estimated for period 1950-1956. Basio data indicates a possible high reading for January 1, 1955, due probably to annexations by an incorporated c ity .
Object Description
Title | An analytical study of the physical distribution of population in Los Angeles County, 1946-1956 |
Author | Van Loan, Wallace Warner |
Degree | Master of Business Administration |
Document type | Thesis |
Degree program | Business Administration |
School | School of Commerce |
Date defended/completed | 1957-08 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Highman, Arthur |
Abstract | During the past three decades there has been an increasing interest in population -- its numbers, its make-up or composition, its distribution in space, and the changes therein, and its growth. This interest in population is not misplaced as the population faots and changes are most intimately bound up with the immediate welfare of individuals, and from a broader standpoint with the masses. Also, reliable information must be on hand because it is essential to effective administration and appraisal of many activities of government. Varied information on population growth and its geographic distribution is also needed by the business community, and by civic and welfare organizations. All these must base their future activities, in some part, on projections of future population, and its distribution. A considered appraisal of underlyingrelationships and trends, based upon careful evaluation of past and present, is basic to projection of the future.; Statement of the problem. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether a mathematical relationship exists between population density growth and/or growth in Los Angeles County over the years and distance from the Central Business District .; Importance of the study. Many of the major decisions made by government, business men, and others, depend upon express or implied forecasts of population and its distribution.; Governmental projections are related to provision of utilities, schools, highways, etc, From the viewpoint of business, projections are basic to estimating needs for office buildings, retail stores, restaurants, and other services. Community service organizations, too, depend on projections for estimating future needs for their activities. |
Keyword | Sociology, Demography; Geography; expansion; population forecasting; urbanization; census tracts; statistical areas; quadrants; population growth; rate of growth |
Geographic subject (county) | Los Angeles |
Geographic subject (state) | California |
Geographic subject (country) | USA |
Coverage date | 1946/1956 |
Language | English |
Format (aacr2) | xi, 138 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm. |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Digitized by ProQuest |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Van Loan, Wallace Warner |
Physical access | The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the author, as the original true and official version of the work, but does not grant the reader permission to use the work if the desired use is covered by copyright. It is the as rights holder, who must provide use permission if such use is covered by copyright. |
Repository name | University of Southern California Digital Library |
Repository address | USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | EP43516.pdf |
Archival file | Volume6/EP43516.pdf |
Description
Title | An analytical study of the physical distribution of population in Los Angeles County, 1946-1956. - Page 37 |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 24 TiBLE III LOS ANGELES GOÎJNTY PER CENT ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE OF POPULATION VERSUS DISTANCE FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, 1954-1956*, BY QUADRANTS Segment (distance from Central Business D is tric t) Per Cent Annual Rate of Change of Population Quadrant I Quadrant I I Quadrant ! I I I Quadrant 17 Four Quadrants Combined 0 to 2 Mile - 1.5 - 2.0 - 2.5 - 1.5 - 2.0 2 to 4 Mile - 1.5 - .5 - .5 - .5 - .75 4 to 6 Mile + .5 - + .125 - .125 + .25 6 to 8 Mile + 2.5 - .125 + 2.25 + 1.0 + 1.375 8 to 10 Mile + 2.0 + 1.75 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 2.5 10 to 12 Mile + 2.0 + 3.5** + 4.75 + 6.0 + 4.0 12 to 14 Mile + 3.0 + 5.0 + 5.5 + 6.0 + 5.0 1 *Notes The period 1954-1956 was used, with few exceptions, to compute the trend per cent because i t would more nearly show the current rate of change of population. iI **Trend estimated for period 1950-1956. Basio data indicates a possible high reading for January 1, 1955, due probably to annexations by an incorporated c ity . |