Graduate engineers in non-engineering employment. - Page 105 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 105 of 164 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
97
! regarding a man’s actual duties on the basis of his job
title* Out of 120 valid replies received, only nineteen
questionnaires replied with a zero or none to question 1
as to the number of non-engineering jobs the respondent
held since graduation from engineering school* Xt is felt,
however, that some of these nineteen engineers who claim
never to have worked in non-engineering duties are persons
who objected to or rejected the definition of non-engineering
jobs as requiring less than per cent of the individual's
working hours, and that some of these people used
their own definition of engineering work in replying to
question 1. No attempt was made ; to reclassify any of the
i vice presidents, sales managers, professors, and admin- jj
istrators ineluded in the aforementioned group of nineteen
| engineers.
It may be concluded, however, that about 90 per
cent of the respondents to the survey were graduate engineers
who had held at least one job in a capacity not
considered as engineering work according to the definition
given herein.
As was to be expected, a number of respondents disliked
being classified as non-engineers on the basis of
the definition given in question 1 of the questionnaire
or on the basis of their job title. Five comments were
received on this subject. A production superintendent
Object Description
Description
| Title | Graduate engineers in non-engineering employment. - Page 105 |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | 97 ! regarding a man’s actual duties on the basis of his job title* Out of 120 valid replies received, only nineteen questionnaires replied with a zero or none to question 1 as to the number of non-engineering jobs the respondent held since graduation from engineering school* Xt is felt, however, that some of these nineteen engineers who claim never to have worked in non-engineering duties are persons who objected to or rejected the definition of non-engineering jobs as requiring less than per cent of the individual's working hours, and that some of these people used their own definition of engineering work in replying to question 1. No attempt was made ; to reclassify any of the i vice presidents, sales managers, professors, and admin- jj istrators ineluded in the aforementioned group of nineteen | engineers. It may be concluded, however, that about 90 per cent of the respondents to the survey were graduate engineers who had held at least one job in a capacity not considered as engineering work according to the definition given herein. As was to be expected, a number of respondents disliked being classified as non-engineers on the basis of the definition given in question 1 of the questionnaire or on the basis of their job title. Five comments were received on this subject. A production superintendent |
