The aftermath of the dissolution of Zaibatsus, the Japanese combines: A study of the post-war development of monopoly in Japan. - Page 158 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 158 of 179 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
li+8
Sumitomo Chemical Industry and Dow-Corning (United
States)— Japan Silicon Company, Ltd.
........ silicon.
Furukawa Denko, a few other corporations of the
Furukawa group, and Goodrich Chemical
(United States)— Japan Zeon Company, Ltd.
........ binyliden.
Cases of mere technical agreement involving no
managerial participation are also numerous, counting fifty-seven
as of the end of 1953* The terms of such agreements
are more unfavorable for Japanese partners than those in the
pre-war period— exorbitant royalties and concession of sole
sales agency to the foreign partners.
Worthy of mentioning is the fact that these cases of
technical assistance agreements with or without managerial
participation entered into by Japanese chemical industrial
manufacturers with the hope of winning dominance over
others, have often ended in even harsher competition not
only among themselves but also among their foreign partners
in the Japanese market. The clash between the American
Chemical Paint Corporation (United States) through its
Japanese partners, Nissan Chemicals Company, Ltd. and
Ishihara Industries Company, Ltd.; Imperial Chemical
Industries, Ltd. (Great Britain) through Japanese Mitsui
Object Description
Description
| Title | The aftermath of the dissolution of Zaibatsus, the Japanese combines: A study of the post-war development of monopoly in Japan. - Page 158 |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | li+8 Sumitomo Chemical Industry and Dow-Corning (United States)— Japan Silicon Company, Ltd. ........ silicon. Furukawa Denko, a few other corporations of the Furukawa group, and Goodrich Chemical (United States)— Japan Zeon Company, Ltd. ........ binyliden. Cases of mere technical agreement involving no managerial participation are also numerous, counting fifty-seven as of the end of 1953* The terms of such agreements are more unfavorable for Japanese partners than those in the pre-war period— exorbitant royalties and concession of sole sales agency to the foreign partners. Worthy of mentioning is the fact that these cases of technical assistance agreements with or without managerial participation entered into by Japanese chemical industrial manufacturers with the hope of winning dominance over others, have often ended in even harsher competition not only among themselves but also among their foreign partners in the Japanese market. The clash between the American Chemical Paint Corporation (United States) through its Japanese partners, Nissan Chemicals Company, Ltd. and Ishihara Industries Company, Ltd.; Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Great Britain) through Japanese Mitsui |
