A comparison of in-company and university training programs as a means of attaining the objectives of executive development. - Page 160 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 160 of 192 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
I 152
I |One of the biggest disadvantages of the in-company program,
jquestionnaires disclose, is that participants are not
relieved of their responsibility while they are attending.
This, they feel, detracts from the learning process.
Conversely, questionnaires disclose, one of the strong
points in favor of the university program is that participants
are relieved of all other responsibility during the
course and are in continual contact with other students and
|with the faculty.
t ’ I
The objectives of executive development were j
defined and discussed, in considerable detail in Chapter II
of this study. These objectives may be restated as on-the-job
improvementj increasing individual potential for
advancement into jobs of greater responsibility! clarification
of the opportunities through which self-development
[may be fostered and encouraged,* and developing among all
Jmanagement personnel appreciation for their individual
responsibilities for the selection, training, placement,
and utilization of personnel on a company-wide basis. It
was the conclusion of this study that in-company and university
programs are aimed generally at the achievement of
two separate goals. One is to give the individual executive
training and experience with respect to the specific
aspects of the particular company's operations, policies,
procedures, and interrelationships. In this, the survey
found, the in-company program is by far the most
Object Description
Description
| Title | A comparison of in-company and university training programs as a means of attaining the objectives of executive development. - Page 160 |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | I 152 I |One of the biggest disadvantages of the in-company program, jquestionnaires disclose, is that participants are not relieved of their responsibility while they are attending. This, they feel, detracts from the learning process. Conversely, questionnaires disclose, one of the strong points in favor of the university program is that participants are relieved of all other responsibility during the course and are in continual contact with other students and |with the faculty. t ’ I The objectives of executive development were j defined and discussed, in considerable detail in Chapter II of this study. These objectives may be restated as on-the-job improvementj increasing individual potential for advancement into jobs of greater responsibility! clarification of the opportunities through which self-development [may be fostered and encouraged,* and developing among all Jmanagement personnel appreciation for their individual responsibilities for the selection, training, placement, and utilization of personnel on a company-wide basis. It was the conclusion of this study that in-company and university programs are aimed generally at the achievement of two separate goals. One is to give the individual executive training and experience with respect to the specific aspects of the particular company's operations, policies, procedures, and interrelationships. In this, the survey found, the in-company program is by far the most |
