A comparison of in-company and university training programs as a means of attaining the objectives of executive development. - Page 47 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 47 of 192 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
I
Management Association as a result of a recent survey into
current management development practices. These funda-
|mentals are:
1; 1. Men and women cannot he "developed..” They can, I
however, he encouraged and inspired,to,improve and !
develop themselves, i 2. Individuals will develop hest hy not concentrating
! on themselves hut,rather, hy becoming absorbed in
a task that requires all their abilities, energies, and determination.
3. Having to thus exert themselves, these individuals
I will turn voluntarily and eagerly, for the right
I reasons and. in the right spirit, to the develop- ,
ment and educational aids within the company or j
1 elsewhere with benefit to themselves and to the i j company. i
j 4. Company management, while protecting and serving !
I its basic economic purpose and integrity, must ;
j motivate employees to do their best which will
encourage Individual self-development, j 5 * The greatest untapped potential for such motivation > and need fulfillment, in the superior-subordinate ;
1 relationship, lies in inviting or requiring more J
j participation by the subordinate in the planning j phases of each responsibility. This means that individuals are taught to use their strengths and. guard, against their weaknesses.
6 . Company management must provide an organizational
climate which will indicate to an individual that management gives recognition to such self-development efforts.2? 1
Analysis of questionnaires discloses that assistance
in individual self-development is an important
j aspect of executive development. Of those responding to
i the questionnaire, 5 per cent stated that "individual self-development”
was a specific objective of their In-company !
2j
! James C. Sinnegan, "Current Practice in the
j Development of Management Personnel," Research Report #26,
| Mew York: American Management Association, TP55, PP* 34-35•
Object Description
Description
| Title | A comparison of in-company and university training programs as a means of attaining the objectives of executive development. - Page 47 |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | I Management Association as a result of a recent survey into current management development practices. These funda- |mentals are: 1; 1. Men and women cannot he "developed..” They can, I however, he encouraged and inspired,to,improve and ! develop themselves, i 2. Individuals will develop hest hy not concentrating ! on themselves hut,rather, hy becoming absorbed in a task that requires all their abilities, energies, and determination. 3. Having to thus exert themselves, these individuals I will turn voluntarily and eagerly, for the right I reasons and. in the right spirit, to the develop- , ment and educational aids within the company or j 1 elsewhere with benefit to themselves and to the i j company. i j 4. Company management, while protecting and serving ! I its basic economic purpose and integrity, must ; j motivate employees to do their best which will encourage Individual self-development, j 5 * The greatest untapped potential for such motivation > and need fulfillment, in the superior-subordinate ; 1 relationship, lies in inviting or requiring more J j participation by the subordinate in the planning j phases of each responsibility. This means that individuals are taught to use their strengths and. guard, against their weaknesses. 6 . Company management must provide an organizational climate which will indicate to an individual that management gives recognition to such self-development efforts.2? 1 Analysis of questionnaires discloses that assistance in individual self-development is an important j aspect of executive development. Of those responding to i the questionnaire, 5 per cent stated that "individual self-development” was a specific objective of their In-company ! 2j ! James C. Sinnegan, "Current Practice in the j Development of Management Personnel," Research Report #26, | Mew York: American Management Association, TP55, PP* 34-35• |
