Solving India's unemployment through industrial planning. - Page 199 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 199 of 232 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
j sufficient but also be directed with regard to the
| quality and the location of labor that is available. The j I i
| labor supply must be capable of following the changes in
j demands that are inseparable from technical advancement.
Prevention of idleness forced by mass unemployment
is a difficult task. Detailed legislation is neither
needed nor is useful. It is a problem of adjusting
states action to the free activities of the citizens.
As William H. Beveridge explained the situation: ■
Even under full employment, there unemployment, that on each day some mewinl la blbee asnodme JI willing to work will not be working, as there is Tshoem e deufneimnpiltoiyomne nats suemveesn tihna tt,h e hoUwneitveedr gSrteaatte s thteoday. ! unsatisfied demand for labor, there is an irreducible [ minimum of unemployment, a margin in the labor force required to make change and movement possible.2 I
I Full employment depends on the flexibility of
| labor supply as well as on sufficiency of demand, does
not imply the view that in peace all work-people will
be under continuous necessity to change their jobs and f
places of work. If demand is directed with regard to j
the labor available and its location— there is no
reason why most people should not continue in their
chosen occuptations and their settled homes so long as
they desire. Mobility of labor does not mean perpetual
motion. Mobility of labor means that labor should be
2W. H. Beveridge, Full Employment in Free Society (New York: W. W. Nortonand Company, Inc., 19^5)> P» 125«
Object Description
Description
| Title | Solving India's unemployment through industrial planning. - Page 199 |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | j sufficient but also be directed with regard to the | quality and the location of labor that is available. The j I i | labor supply must be capable of following the changes in j demands that are inseparable from technical advancement. Prevention of idleness forced by mass unemployment is a difficult task. Detailed legislation is neither needed nor is useful. It is a problem of adjusting states action to the free activities of the citizens. As William H. Beveridge explained the situation: ■ Even under full employment, there unemployment, that on each day some mewinl la blbee asnodme JI willing to work will not be working, as there is Tshoem e deufneimnpiltoiyomne nats suemveesn tihna tt,h e hoUwneitveedr gSrteaatte s thteoday. ! unsatisfied demand for labor, there is an irreducible [ minimum of unemployment, a margin in the labor force required to make change and movement possible.2 I I Full employment depends on the flexibility of | labor supply as well as on sufficiency of demand, does not imply the view that in peace all work-people will be under continuous necessity to change their jobs and f places of work. If demand is directed with regard to j the labor available and its location— there is no reason why most people should not continue in their chosen occuptations and their settled homes so long as they desire. Mobility of labor does not mean perpetual motion. Mobility of labor means that labor should be 2W. H. Beveridge, Full Employment in Free Society (New York: W. W. Nortonand Company, Inc., 19^5)> P» 125« |
