An experimental investigation of air cargo densities and some other operational factors related to transport aircraft fuselage design. - Page 93 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 93 of 115 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
7 A Shape of the cargo compartment* One consideration pertaining to the shape of the eargo compartment is that ofji i the length to width ratio. From a materials handling j standpoint, a length to width ratio of ahout four to one is the most desirable to shorten the distance between the front and rear loading doors.Q7 Also the wider cabin will allow a greater freedom of movement and is conducive to faster loading times. Then too, a wide cargo compartment j provides the accessibility necessary to facilitate loading ji and unloading operations at intransit stations without | causing extensive load shifting due to the necessity of j balance limitations of a longer aircraft fuselage with i correspondingly longer moment arms. ! j The matter of aircraft balance begs some explana- j ;tion. An aircraft must be kept within certain balance !1 limits in order that it may perform as it was designed to ; ido. These balance limits are expressed in terms of a per- 1 ; centage of the mean aerodynamic chord of the wing as comiputed by the designer. Balance computations of a cargo load are expressed in terms of moments (distance of the i 'cargo from the reference datum x weight of a specific piece , of cargo) or by the formula: Moment = arm x weight. In ! ^Lt. Col. Ben W. Hunsaker, nA Transport Aircraft j Evaluation System,w (unpublished report to the Commander, j :Military Air Transport Service, United States Air Force,
Object Description
Description
Title | An experimental investigation of air cargo densities and some other operational factors related to transport aircraft fuselage design. - Page 93 |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 7 A Shape of the cargo compartment* One consideration pertaining to the shape of the eargo compartment is that ofji i the length to width ratio. From a materials handling j standpoint, a length to width ratio of ahout four to one is the most desirable to shorten the distance between the front and rear loading doors.Q7 Also the wider cabin will allow a greater freedom of movement and is conducive to faster loading times. Then too, a wide cargo compartment j provides the accessibility necessary to facilitate loading ji and unloading operations at intransit stations without | causing extensive load shifting due to the necessity of j balance limitations of a longer aircraft fuselage with i correspondingly longer moment arms. ! j The matter of aircraft balance begs some explana- j ;tion. An aircraft must be kept within certain balance !1 limits in order that it may perform as it was designed to ; ido. These balance limits are expressed in terms of a per- 1 ; centage of the mean aerodynamic chord of the wing as comiputed by the designer. Balance computations of a cargo load are expressed in terms of moments (distance of the i 'cargo from the reference datum x weight of a specific piece , of cargo) or by the formula: Moment = arm x weight. In ! ^Lt. Col. Ben W. Hunsaker, nA Transport Aircraft j Evaluation System,w (unpublished report to the Commander, j :Military Air Transport Service, United States Air Force, |