Page 21 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 21 of 31 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
18 Push for Change Due to outside forces that may be stronger than any cultural awareness assembly or volunteer intervention, students at Dorsey may have to come together sooner than imagined. In 2010, the campus was placed on the Public School Choice Program list. The program was created by the Los Angeles Unified School District and selects the district’s low performing schools based largely on state test scores and graduation rates. Charter school corporations as well as the school’s present administration and faculty are then allowed to bid for control of restructuring the school. There are several criteria for placing schools on the list, with testing being one of the high priorities. Those schools that score less than 600 on the Academic Performance Index and show less than 100 points of improvement over the course of five years are subject. In 2010, Dorsey’s API score was 571, which was an improvement from its 2005 score of 501. Though numbers have steadily increased since that time, they have not met the 100-point improvement mark. Dorsey faculty and many parents are opposed to the notion of a charter school takeover. Charter schools credit themselves with improving test scores and graduation rates. Critics say that is often a result of cherry-picking the highest performing students and the exclusion of Special Education and English as Second Language programs. Some worry that some students in the community would be left out in the cold. “I think our students would be forced to change schools to find a public school that serves their needs,” said Lorena Santos an English as Second Language instructor at Dorsey.
Object Description
Title | Dorsey High School: a lesson in transformation |
Author | Kirkland, LeTania R. |
Author email | letania.kirkland@gmail.com; letania_kirkland@yahoo.com |
Degree | Master of Arts |
Document type | Thesis |
Degree program | Journalism (Print Journalism) |
School | Annenberg School for Communication |
Date defended/completed | 2011-03-28 |
Date submitted | 2011 |
Restricted until | Unrestricted |
Date published | 2011-05-04 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Gutierrez, Felix |
Advisor (committee member) |
Celis, William Wilson, Fracille |
Abstract | Susan Miller Dorsey High School in Los Angeles is at a crossroads. The school serves a community that, for decades, has been hailed as one of the largest historically black enclaves in the city. However, as migration throughout Los Angeles continues, what was once a predominately African-American community is almost equally Latino. This dramatic shift is mirrored at Dorsey, which some students and faculty call a segregated campus. However, there are others who believe the school has the potential to overcome stereotypes of so-called black/brown tension in Los Angeles. Dorsey’s faculty is working to create cohesion on campus and effectively serve the ever-changing community that it serves. |
Keyword | Dorsey High School; Los Angeles; race; class; demographics; south Los Angeles; immigration; education |
Geographic subject (city or populated place) | Los Angeles |
Geographic subject (state) | California |
Geographic subject (country) | USA |
Coverage date | 2000/2011 |
Language | English |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3890 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Kirkland, LeTania R. |
Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | etd-Kirkland-4459 |
Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume29/etd-Kirkland-4459.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 21 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 18 Push for Change Due to outside forces that may be stronger than any cultural awareness assembly or volunteer intervention, students at Dorsey may have to come together sooner than imagined. In 2010, the campus was placed on the Public School Choice Program list. The program was created by the Los Angeles Unified School District and selects the district’s low performing schools based largely on state test scores and graduation rates. Charter school corporations as well as the school’s present administration and faculty are then allowed to bid for control of restructuring the school. There are several criteria for placing schools on the list, with testing being one of the high priorities. Those schools that score less than 600 on the Academic Performance Index and show less than 100 points of improvement over the course of five years are subject. In 2010, Dorsey’s API score was 571, which was an improvement from its 2005 score of 501. Though numbers have steadily increased since that time, they have not met the 100-point improvement mark. Dorsey faculty and many parents are opposed to the notion of a charter school takeover. Charter schools credit themselves with improving test scores and graduation rates. Critics say that is often a result of cherry-picking the highest performing students and the exclusion of Special Education and English as Second Language programs. Some worry that some students in the community would be left out in the cold. “I think our students would be forced to change schools to find a public school that serves their needs,” said Lorena Santos an English as Second Language instructor at Dorsey. |