Page 107 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 107 of 231 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
98 the presence of parents and the extent to which they are integrated into the partnership as a stakeholder. Lastly, the research team carefully observed the behaviors of all members of the partnership to see how it impacted parental efficacy with regards to engagement in the partnership. The research team analyzed the field notes in comparison to the interviews for consistencies and inconsistencies in responses to the research questions. Analyzing Documents and Artifacts According to Miller (cited in Patton, 2001, p. 91), “demystifying institutional texts is one way of demystifying institutional authority.” The research team identified parallels between attitudes, actions and behaviors noted in observations and interviews and compared them to the formal documentation of these events. The researchers noted evidence in the artifacts of the cultures and actions of each organization during the partnership’s second year of operation. The team also identified the content of the partnership’s agenda and meeting minutes, specifically as it applied to demonstrating evidence of co-construction and parental engagement efforts. The objective was to note the degree to which the partnership had developed a new cultural model for parental engagement, enhanced parental efficacy and sustained the co-constructive process in its second year of operation. Artifacts were also analyzed for consistencies and inconsistencies among values, basic assumptions within the partnership. Ethical Considerations
Object Description
Title | Co-constructing community, school and university partnerships for urban school transformation: Year two |
Author | Woodyard, Savina M. |
Author email | SavinaW@aol.com; savinaw@gmail.com |
Degree | Doctor of Education |
Document type | Dissertation |
Degree program | Education (Leadership) |
School | Rossier School of Education |
Date defended/completed | 2011-03-22 |
Date submitted | 2011 |
Restricted until | Unrestricted |
Date published | 2011-04-19 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Rousseau, Sylvia G. |
Advisor (committee member) |
Stowe, Kathy Huisong Marsh, David D. |
Abstract | Community-school-university partnerships represent a new model of urban education reform that incorporates the overlapping spheres of influence in the transformation process. Co-constructed relationships between communities, schools and universities have the potential reshape organizational hierarchy and enable all partners to develop a new cultural model capable of transforming K-12 urban schools. This study the second and third year of one co-constructed community-school-university partnership that attempted to transform the cultural model of one urban high school.; The aim of this study is to identify and analyze the extent to which a community-school-university partnership is able to sustain elements of co-construction and other ongoing processes that are beneficial to the partnership. Also, the study will identify the persistent barriers to co-constructions and effective strategies to overcome those barriers within a community-school-university partnership. This study expands on the research conducted during the first year of the partnership’s operation and will offer insight as to the sustainability of the co-constructed processes between the community-school-university partnership. This study will also identify the methods in which the community-school-university partnership can develop a new cultural model for parental engagement in the interest of school transformation. |
Keyword | partnership; co-construction; urban school; transformation; parental engagement |
Geographic subject (state) | California |
Geographic subject (country) | USA |
Coverage date | 2000/2010 |
Language | English |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3759 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Woodyard, Savina M. |
Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | etd-Woodyard-4509 |
Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume62/etd-Woodyard-4509.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 107 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 98 the presence of parents and the extent to which they are integrated into the partnership as a stakeholder. Lastly, the research team carefully observed the behaviors of all members of the partnership to see how it impacted parental efficacy with regards to engagement in the partnership. The research team analyzed the field notes in comparison to the interviews for consistencies and inconsistencies in responses to the research questions. Analyzing Documents and Artifacts According to Miller (cited in Patton, 2001, p. 91), “demystifying institutional texts is one way of demystifying institutional authority.” The research team identified parallels between attitudes, actions and behaviors noted in observations and interviews and compared them to the formal documentation of these events. The researchers noted evidence in the artifacts of the cultures and actions of each organization during the partnership’s second year of operation. The team also identified the content of the partnership’s agenda and meeting minutes, specifically as it applied to demonstrating evidence of co-construction and parental engagement efforts. The objective was to note the degree to which the partnership had developed a new cultural model for parental engagement, enhanced parental efficacy and sustained the co-constructive process in its second year of operation. Artifacts were also analyzed for consistencies and inconsistencies among values, basic assumptions within the partnership. Ethical Considerations |