Page 87 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 87 of 231 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
78
the relationship between the research questions and the instruments that were used to
collect the data.
Table 3.4: Triangulation Using a Variety of Data Collection Instruments
Research Question Artifacts Observations Interviews
1. What evidence of ongoing
processes, including co-construction,
does a community-school-
university partnership
demonstrate as it continues to
work toward school improvement
after its first year of operation?
X X X
1a. What are the barriers that
persist in co-constructing and
sustaining a community-school-university
partnership created to
improve an urban school?
X X X
1b. What are effective strategies in
place that demonstrate the ability
to overcome the persistent barriers
in community-school-university
partnerships seeking to improve
student achievement in an urban
school?
X X X
2. How can the community-school-
university partnership
influence the development of a
new cultural model leading to
parental engagement in the interest
of students?
X X X
Object Description
| Title | Co-constructing community, school and university partnerships for urban school transformation: Year two |
| Author | Woodyard, Savina M. |
| Author email | SavinaW@aol.com; savinaw@gmail.com |
| Degree | Doctor of Education |
| Document type | Dissertation |
| Degree program | Education (Leadership) |
| School | Rossier School of Education |
| Date defended/completed | 2011-03-22 |
| Date submitted | 2011 |
| Restricted until | Unrestricted |
| Date published | 2011-04-19 |
| Advisor (committee chair) | Rousseau, Sylvia G. |
| Advisor (committee member) |
Stowe, Kathy Huisong Marsh, David D. |
| Abstract | Community-school-university partnerships represent a new model of urban education reform that incorporates the overlapping spheres of influence in the transformation process. Co-constructed relationships between communities, schools and universities have the potential reshape organizational hierarchy and enable all partners to develop a new cultural model capable of transforming K-12 urban schools. This study the second and third year of one co-constructed community-school-university partnership that attempted to transform the cultural model of one urban high school.; The aim of this study is to identify and analyze the extent to which a community-school-university partnership is able to sustain elements of co-construction and other ongoing processes that are beneficial to the partnership. Also, the study will identify the persistent barriers to co-constructions and effective strategies to overcome those barriers within a community-school-university partnership. This study expands on the research conducted during the first year of the partnership’s operation and will offer insight as to the sustainability of the co-constructed processes between the community-school-university partnership. This study will also identify the methods in which the community-school-university partnership can develop a new cultural model for parental engagement in the interest of school transformation. |
| Keyword | partnership; co-construction; urban school; transformation; parental engagement |
| Geographic subject (state) | California |
| Geographic subject (country) | USA |
| Coverage date | 2000/2010 |
| Language | English |
| Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
| Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
| Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
| Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
| Type | texts |
| Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3759 |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Rights | Woodyard, Savina M. |
| Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
| Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Filename | etd-Woodyard-4509 |
| Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume62/etd-Woodyard-4509.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 87 |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | 78 the relationship between the research questions and the instruments that were used to collect the data. Table 3.4: Triangulation Using a Variety of Data Collection Instruments Research Question Artifacts Observations Interviews 1. What evidence of ongoing processes, including co-construction, does a community-school- university partnership demonstrate as it continues to work toward school improvement after its first year of operation? X X X 1a. What are the barriers that persist in co-constructing and sustaining a community-school-university partnership created to improve an urban school? X X X 1b. What are effective strategies in place that demonstrate the ability to overcome the persistent barriers in community-school-university partnerships seeking to improve student achievement in an urban school? X X X 2. How can the community-school- university partnership influence the development of a new cultural model leading to parental engagement in the interest of students? X X X |
