Page 85 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 85 of 231 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
76
data prior to the partnership’s inception and implementation. The tables that follow
describe the school’s demographic and achievement characteristics.
Table 3.1: School Demographic Data, 2009-10
Ethnic/Racial
Subgroup
Enrollment Percent of Total
(School)
Percent of Total
(District)
American Indian 8 0.4% 0.3%
Asian 3 0.1% 3.7%
Pacific Islander 5 0.2% 0.3%
Filipino 5 0.2% 2.2%
Hispanic 674 33.1% 73.2%
African American 1,326 65.0% 10.7%
White 4 0.2% 8.8%
Multiple/No Response 14 0.7% 0.8%
Total 2,039 100% 100%
Source: California Department of Education, 2010
Table 3.2: School Drop Out Rates (2005-06 to 2007-08)
Drop Out Rates 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008
School District School District One-Year Drop School District
Out Rate (Grades
9-12) 6.5% 5.0% 11.6% 7.8% 10.1% 6.7%
Four-Year Drop Schools District School District School District
Out Rate (Grades
9-12) 29.2% 25.3% 48.6% 31.7% 41.4% 26.4%
Graduation Rate School District School District School District
56.9% 63.9% 41.0% 67.1% 51.8% 72.4%
Source: California Department of Education, 2010
Object Description
| Title | Co-constructing community, school and university partnerships for urban school transformation: Year two |
| Author | Woodyard, Savina M. |
| Author email | SavinaW@aol.com; savinaw@gmail.com |
| Degree | Doctor of Education |
| Document type | Dissertation |
| Degree program | Education (Leadership) |
| School | Rossier School of Education |
| Date defended/completed | 2011-03-22 |
| Date submitted | 2011 |
| Restricted until | Unrestricted |
| Date published | 2011-04-19 |
| Advisor (committee chair) | Rousseau, Sylvia G. |
| Advisor (committee member) |
Stowe, Kathy Huisong Marsh, David D. |
| Abstract | Community-school-university partnerships represent a new model of urban education reform that incorporates the overlapping spheres of influence in the transformation process. Co-constructed relationships between communities, schools and universities have the potential reshape organizational hierarchy and enable all partners to develop a new cultural model capable of transforming K-12 urban schools. This study the second and third year of one co-constructed community-school-university partnership that attempted to transform the cultural model of one urban high school.; The aim of this study is to identify and analyze the extent to which a community-school-university partnership is able to sustain elements of co-construction and other ongoing processes that are beneficial to the partnership. Also, the study will identify the persistent barriers to co-constructions and effective strategies to overcome those barriers within a community-school-university partnership. This study expands on the research conducted during the first year of the partnership’s operation and will offer insight as to the sustainability of the co-constructed processes between the community-school-university partnership. This study will also identify the methods in which the community-school-university partnership can develop a new cultural model for parental engagement in the interest of school transformation. |
| Keyword | partnership; co-construction; urban school; transformation; parental engagement |
| Geographic subject (state) | California |
| Geographic subject (country) | USA |
| Coverage date | 2000/2010 |
| Language | English |
| Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
| Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
| Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
| Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
| Type | texts |
| Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3759 |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Rights | Woodyard, Savina M. |
| Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
| Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Filename | etd-Woodyard-4509 |
| Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume62/etd-Woodyard-4509.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 85 |
| Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
| Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
| Full text | 76 data prior to the partnership’s inception and implementation. The tables that follow describe the school’s demographic and achievement characteristics. Table 3.1: School Demographic Data, 2009-10 Ethnic/Racial Subgroup Enrollment Percent of Total (School) Percent of Total (District) American Indian 8 0.4% 0.3% Asian 3 0.1% 3.7% Pacific Islander 5 0.2% 0.3% Filipino 5 0.2% 2.2% Hispanic 674 33.1% 73.2% African American 1,326 65.0% 10.7% White 4 0.2% 8.8% Multiple/No Response 14 0.7% 0.8% Total 2,039 100% 100% Source: California Department of Education, 2010 Table 3.2: School Drop Out Rates (2005-06 to 2007-08) Drop Out Rates 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 School District School District One-Year Drop School District Out Rate (Grades 9-12) 6.5% 5.0% 11.6% 7.8% 10.1% 6.7% Four-Year Drop Schools District School District School District Out Rate (Grades 9-12) 29.2% 25.3% 48.6% 31.7% 41.4% 26.4% Graduation Rate School District School District School District 56.9% 63.9% 41.0% 67.1% 51.8% 72.4% Source: California Department of Education, 2010 |
