Page 251 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 251 of 427 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
240 Since the earliest daguerreotypes, photographic cameras have been marked as devices for entertainment, art and as scientific tools—able to record reality faithfully, but also able to detect that which the unaided human eye could not see.46 As Leslie K. Brown reports, “Even today, photography continues to explore the farthest regions of the universe; our only proof of the existence of these objects or phenomena is photographs of things we could never ‘see’ with our naked eyes.”47 There is thus a strong impulse to believe what we see: seeing is believing, after all, and that adage is only strengthened by the fact that discourses of science—with their attendant claims to “truth”—have been used to legitimize the indexicality of images since photography was born.48 Yet, photographic images can also be ripe for manipulation.49 The camera thus inhabits a strange liminal space whereby it can be seen as both impartial observer and manipulator of what is placed in front of it. An epistemological crisis of sorts is !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 46 Many film theorists, especially in the early 20th century, were especially fond of thinking of the film camera as that which could see better than the human eye. For instance, Dziga Vertov called the camera the “kino-eye” and held it to be superior to the human eye as it could slow life down, speed it up, superimpose images one on the other, or view life at the microscopic level. See Dziga Vertov, Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov, ed. Annette Michelson, trans. Kevin O’ Brien (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984). 47 Leslie K. Brown, “Concerning the Spiritual in Photography,” In the Loupe, Journal of the Photographic Research Center at Boston University (January/February 2004), accessed on July 22, 2010, http://www.bu.edu/prc/spirit/essay.htm. 48 And, a case could be made, up through today. Of course, there is an assumption inherent in such claims that scientific measurements and recordings offer unmediated fact, which is debatable. 49 Besides overt manipulation like CGI or Photoshopping, the very shooting and editing of a series of photographs is a manipulation: the deliberate selections of how close to a subject to shoot, in what light, from what angle—even the selection of a subject at all—speak to some form of authorial presence.
Object Description
Title | And the dead shall walk the earth: Zombies and the politics of death |
Author | Kee, Chera Dezarae |
Author email | ckee@usc.edu; ckee211@gmail.com |
Degree | Doctor of Philosophy |
Document type | Dissertation |
Degree program | Cinema-Television (Cinema Critical Studies) |
School | School of Cinematic Arts |
Date defended/completed | 2011-03-08 |
Date submitted | 2011 |
Restricted until | Unrestricted |
Date published | 2011-05-04 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Marez, Curtis |
Advisor (committee member) |
Kinder, Marsha Hoskins, Janet |
Abstract | In October 2009, five pale, blood-stained teenagers sat on a curb in Newhall, California. They were not crime victims nor movie extras. Rather, these teens were “zombies,” waiting to participate in a Zombie Walk. These events, where groups of people dressed as zombies lumber through the streets, have been happening globally since 2001 and entice up to several thousand participants for each walk. Zombies are familiar characters in comic books, video games, television and film, but with thousands of people dressing as zombies and taking to the streets, it becomes clear that the kinds of work zombies do in U.S. culture provides insight into how we approach death, try to diffuse its potency, and use it to make political interventions into everyday life. Zombies are critical repositories of social fears and desires related to capitalist wage slavery, race, gender, and the political power of the masses, and as such, they demonstrate how representations and performances of death, in widely different forms, have served remarkably consistent functions in the United States throughout the past two centuries.; This project seeks to show that the zombie, as a creature of both/and—both slave and master, both living and dead, both black and white—is often positioned as that which invades the normative space of the living, a space that is generally conceived of in terms of whiteness, patriarchy, and heterosexuality. In forcing those who exist in this space to face a being who can encompasses both their ideals and that which their society rejects, the zombie can be used to try to support heteronormative ideals and the status quo while also undercutting those same ideals—often within the same text.; Chapter one provides a survey of zombie scholarship and describes the history of the figure in U.S. popular culture. Chapter two places zombies in their historical context, considering their ties to Vodou belief and U.S-Haitian relations. Examining travelogues, magazine articles, and official documents about Haiti circulating in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the zombie is identified as one in a long line of figures used in debates surrounding dependent territories, self-rule, and the limits of U.S. democracy. Early film zombies thus come to symbolize the paradoxes of capitalist democracy in the United States and as such, offer a potentially liberating imaginative escape from dominant systems. However, this idealistic feature of zombies is restricted by racism in early zombie films.; Chapter three considers how the zombie state in film is marked by race and gender, arguing that while the zombie can be terrifying, it also presents a fantasy of escape from white, heteronormative patriarchy. This fantasy state is often racialized, positioning blackness as more attractive than normative whiteness, and female characters frequently offer a point of identification with it. Many zombie films are therefore sites for staging conflicts over non-heteronormative desires, both promoting and punishing the transgressive and non-normative, often within the same text.; The fourth chapter considers the connection between the spectator’s relationship to images of death in 19th century presentations, like phantasmagoria shows and séances, to that same relationship in contemporary zombie video games. Arguing that certain visual technologies can encourage a sort of doubling of consciousness that empowers spectators/players, this chapter maintains that this empowerment, when placed in the context of representations of the dead-come-back-to life, allows spectators/players to enact desires that show death not as final, but as something that can be transcended, which ultimately robs the zombie of some of its inherent political potential.; The fifth chapter examines Zombie Walks. These events present a contemporary example of death being introduced into the world of the living to unsettle assumptions of how public space should be used. Public performances of zombiness disrupt the normative capitalist expectations of the spaces in which “zombies” walk while simultaneously allowing walkers to reject Western beauty ideals by dressing up as rotting, ugly corpses. In this way, zombie walkers offer an important example of the contemporary carnivalesque.; The final chapter of this project illustrates that while the zombie can stand as something that is both comforting and threatening, in either guise, it carries with it the potential of another way of imagining human society, and as such, it can represent the aspirations of any who feel that they are made over as slaves, cannibals, the infected, or the abject by their society’s standards. Thus, often, in the form of the zombie, death is not only made attractive in U.S. popular culture, it is made politically useful as well. |
Keyword | zombies in film; zombie video games; Zombie Walks; voodoo in film; U.S./Haiti relations; race in film; gender in film; phantasmagoria; spiritualist phenomena; zombies and the carnivalesque |
Geographic subject (country) | USA |
Coverage date | 2001/2010 |
Language | English |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3808 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Kee, Chera Dezarae |
Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | etd-Kee-4414 |
Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume51/etd-Kee-4414.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 251 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 240 Since the earliest daguerreotypes, photographic cameras have been marked as devices for entertainment, art and as scientific tools—able to record reality faithfully, but also able to detect that which the unaided human eye could not see.46 As Leslie K. Brown reports, “Even today, photography continues to explore the farthest regions of the universe; our only proof of the existence of these objects or phenomena is photographs of things we could never ‘see’ with our naked eyes.”47 There is thus a strong impulse to believe what we see: seeing is believing, after all, and that adage is only strengthened by the fact that discourses of science—with their attendant claims to “truth”—have been used to legitimize the indexicality of images since photography was born.48 Yet, photographic images can also be ripe for manipulation.49 The camera thus inhabits a strange liminal space whereby it can be seen as both impartial observer and manipulator of what is placed in front of it. An epistemological crisis of sorts is !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 46 Many film theorists, especially in the early 20th century, were especially fond of thinking of the film camera as that which could see better than the human eye. For instance, Dziga Vertov called the camera the “kino-eye” and held it to be superior to the human eye as it could slow life down, speed it up, superimpose images one on the other, or view life at the microscopic level. See Dziga Vertov, Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov, ed. Annette Michelson, trans. Kevin O’ Brien (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984). 47 Leslie K. Brown, “Concerning the Spiritual in Photography,” In the Loupe, Journal of the Photographic Research Center at Boston University (January/February 2004), accessed on July 22, 2010, http://www.bu.edu/prc/spirit/essay.htm. 48 And, a case could be made, up through today. Of course, there is an assumption inherent in such claims that scientific measurements and recordings offer unmediated fact, which is debatable. 49 Besides overt manipulation like CGI or Photoshopping, the very shooting and editing of a series of photographs is a manipulation: the deliberate selections of how close to a subject to shoot, in what light, from what angle—even the selection of a subject at all—speak to some form of authorial presence. |