Page 150 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 150 of 217 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large (1000x1000 max)
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
142 Core academic teachers (Self-contained Regular Education) FTEs Kindergarten (Full day program) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 English/Reading/L.A. History/Soc. Studies Math Science Foreign Language NOTES: Specialist and Elective Teachers /Planning and Prep FTEs Art Music PE/Health Drama Technology Career & Technical Education Drivers Education Study Hall Athletics Other Specialist & Elective Teachers Other Specialist & Elective Teachers Description: NOTES:
Object Description
Title | Allocation of educational resources to improve student achievement: Case studies of four California charter schools |
Author | Patrick, Ramona Kay |
Author email | rpatrick@usc.edu; ramonakaypatrick@gmail.com |
Degree | Doctor of Education |
Document type | Dissertation |
Degree program | Education (Leadership) |
School | Rossier School of Education |
Date defended/completed | 2011-03-28 |
Date submitted | 2011 |
Restricted until | Unrestricted |
Date published | 2011-05-04 |
Advisor (committee chair) | Picus, Lawrence O. |
Advisor (committee member) |
Hentschke, Guilbert C. Nelson, John L. |
Abstract | Charter schools are growing at a rapid pace have significantly more flexibility in their allocation of resources in comparison to their traditional public school counterparts in California. Because of this, it is important to study how successful charter schools, with this increased flexibility, are utilizing their resources to achieve high results with their students in a time of fiscal constraint. There is a plethora of data and research on effective school practices to improve student achievement, but a dearth of research on the effective allocation of resources at charter schools. The purpose of this study is to analyze how four high performing charter schools, with high percentages of socioeconomically disadvantaged students in Los Angeles, California, are implementing school improvement strategies and utilizing resources at their school site to impact student achievement. The Evidenced-Based Model, (Odden & Picus, 2008) along with Odden and Archibald’s (2009) Ten Strategies for Doubling Student Performance were used as a lens in this study to compare resource allocation as well as school improvement strategies to best support student achievement at the schools. This study will describe each schools’ instructional vision and improvement strategy, how resources are utilized to implement their instructional improvement plan, how the current fiscal crisis is affecting their allocation of resources, and how actual resource patterns are aligned with the Evidence Based Model (Odden & Picus, 2008). |
Keyword | charter schools; resource allocation; evidenced-based model |
Geographic subject (state) | California |
Geographic subject (country) | USA |
Coverage date | 2000/2010 |
Language | English |
Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
Type | texts |
Legacy record ID | usctheses-m3815 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Rights | Patrick, Ramona Kay |
Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Filename | etd-Patrick-4438 |
Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume51/etd-Patrick-4438.pdf |
Description
Title | Page 150 |
Contributing entity | University of Southern California |
Repository email | cisadmin@lib.usc.edu |
Full text | 142 Core academic teachers (Self-contained Regular Education) FTEs Kindergarten (Full day program) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 English/Reading/L.A. History/Soc. Studies Math Science Foreign Language NOTES: Specialist and Elective Teachers /Planning and Prep FTEs Art Music PE/Health Drama Technology Career & Technical Education Drivers Education Study Hall Athletics Other Specialist & Elective Teachers Other Specialist & Elective Teachers Description: NOTES: |