Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 166 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
Subset |
Defending Rawls's Law of Peoples against Cosmopolitan Critiques
A Dissertation Presented to the
FACULTY OF THE USC GRADUATE SCHOOL
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
In Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
(PHILOSOPHY)
By
Xiao Wei
December, 20 1 2
Object Description
| Title | Defending Rawls's Law of Peoples against cosmopolitan critiques |
| Author | Wei, Xiao |
| Author email | xiaowei@usc.edu;weixiao@me.com |
| Degree | Doctor of Philosophy |
| Document type | Dissertation |
| Degree program | Philosophy |
| School | College of Letters, Arts And Sciences |
| Date defended/completed | 2012-08-15 |
| Date submitted | 2012-11-21 |
| Date approved | 2012-11-21 |
| Restricted until | 2012-11-21 |
| Date published | 2012-11-21 |
| Advisor (committee chair) | Lloyd, Sharon |
| Advisor (committee member) |
Watson, Gary Renteln, Alison |
| Abstract | After the World War II, we have witnessed the increase in international cooperation in almost all aspects of human life. Various global organizations are established for this purpose, for example, the United Nations, European and World Trade Organization. There was a prevalent optimism that, the international cooperation in all these international organizations will reconstruct everyone's identity and each will eventually see herself as the citizen of the world first and foremost. ❧ Such a change is especially welcomed by cosmopolitan theorists, who hold that individuals and their interests should be the ultimate concern for any theory of justice. They consider this ongoing phenomenon to empirically support their conviction that global justice should be justice among individuals rather than justice among states as traditionally conceived. Some cosmopolitans apply the leading liberal philosopher John Rawls's domestic theory of justice to analyze global issues. They conclude that Rawls would agree that global institutions should be reformed following a global difference principle so that the vast inequalities in income and wealth can be reduced. To them, global justice should be justice without borders and the sovereign states should have no moral value in their considerations. ❧ However, Rawls's publication of his own theory of international justice surprisingly disappoints these cosmopolitans. In these cosmopolitans' eyes, Rawls betrays his own liberal concerns for individuals and he becomes a defender of the traditional view of global justice of nations. ❧ Now the question is whether Rawls becomes more conservative in his international theory and keeps distance from his liberal stance in his domestic theory. I believe the answer is no. So the puzzles I try to solve in my dissertation include how a liberal should conceive the most fundamental interests of individuals and what the reasonable global intuitions are required to best protect these interests. ❧ I argue that a liberal should consider self-respect or the sense of worth to be the most fundamental interest of individuals, and their sense of worth partly comes from collectively develop their society provided that the society is well-ordered. Well-ordered societies includes liberal and decent ones, both of which provide necessary social conditions for individuals to develop and sustain their sense of worth. The sense of worth is the precondition for any agent to be able to take her life to be valuable. Without this sense of worth, she would consider her life to be dull and miserable. Liberals, who cherish the equal value and autonomy of human beings, should agree that the sense of the worth is the core of the dignity of human beings. This sense of worth is supported at least partly by respect shown by the society and others to the individual in the choices she makes. One of the choices an individual member of a well-ordered society makes is to participate in the collective decision-making for developing the society, from which process she has a sense of pride and honor. Because this sense of pride and honor partly constitute the sense of worth of a member of a well-ordered society, the global society should respect the integrity, autonomy and independence of a society that provides necessary social conditions for its members to develop a sense of worth, so that individual members may preserve their self-respect in maintaining and developing their shared society. Thus, Rawls's international theory of justice protects his liberal values. ❧ One may ask since liberals are concerned with the equal worth of human beings, don't cosmopolitans more closely adhere to liberal values in envisioning that liberal political liberties should be universalized and included in basic human rights? My answer is no. If a nonliberal society is decent, it equips itself with all necessary social conditions to support the development of self-respect as that of capacities to make reasonable decisions. Thus, from a liberal point of view of respecting individuals, members of a decent society should be allowed to remain in their society and develop their society according to the plan they make collectively, and this decision should be respected. Any reform in the global institutions that involves forcing upon these individuals immediate change for liberal values violates liberal values themselves. ❧ Lastly, how should a liberal deal with the inequalities in wealth and income in the world? Are cosmopolitans right in insisting that there should be certain transnational institutions to reduce the gap among societies even if all of them are well-ordered? The answer is still no. With the fundamental idea that the international original position should consist of representatives of societies established, we need to examine what would naturally follow from it. Representatives will choose to help burdened societies to acquire well-orderedness because this helps realize democratic peace, which is more likely to occur among well-ordered societies. The representatives will also choose not to continue redistributing wealth because doing so does not contribute to the social conditions for self-respect but rather violates the collective autonomy of members of well-ordered societies by imposing a goal of development on them. |
| Keyword | cosmopolitanism; decent societies; global distributive justice; liberal societies; sense of worth; The Law of Peoples |
| Language | English |
| Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
| Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
| Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
| Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
| Type | texts |
| Legacy record ID | usctheses-m |
| Rights | Wei, Xiao |
| Access conditions | The author retains rights to his/her dissertation, thesis or other graduate work according to U.S. copyright law. Electronic access is being provided by the USC Libraries in agreement with the author, as the original true and official version of the work, but does not grant the reader permission to use the work if the desired use is covered by copyright. It is the author, as rights holder, who must provide use permission if such use is covered by copyright. The original signature page accompanying the original submission of the work to the USC Libraries is retained by the USC Libraries and a copy of it may be obtained by authorized requesters contacting the repository e-mail address given. |
| Repository name | University of Southern California Digital Library |
| Repository address | USC Digital Library, University of Southern California, University Park Campus MC 7002, 106 University Village, Los Angeles, California 90089-7002, USA |
| Repository email | cisadmin@usc.edu |
| Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume6/etd-WeiXiao-1327.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 1 |
| Full text | Defending Rawls's Law of Peoples against Cosmopolitan Critiques A Dissertation Presented to the FACULTY OF THE USC GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PHILOSOPHY) By Xiao Wei December, 20 1 2 |
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1
