Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 207 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
Subset |
PROBLEMS SOLVED, PROBLEMS CREATED: A CRITICAL-CASE ANALYSIS OF
A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION FOR AT-RISK
STUDENTS
By
Valerie Callet
______________________________________________________________
A Dissertation Presented to the
FACULTY OF THE USC ROSSIER SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
In Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree
DOCTOR OF EDUCATION
May 2010
Copyright 2010 Valerie Callet
Object Description
| Title | Problems solved, problems created: A critical-case analysis of a public-private partnership in alternative education for at-risk students |
| Author | Callet, Valerie |
| Author email | vcallet@hotmail.com; vcallet@insightfaculty.net |
| Degree | Doctor of Education |
| Document type | Dissertation |
| Degree program | Education (Leadership) |
| School | Rossier School of Education |
| Date defended/completed | 2010-03-25 |
| Date submitted | 2010 |
| Restricted until | Unrestricted |
| Date published | 2010-04-14 |
| Advisor (committee chair) | Hentschke, Guilbert C. |
| Advisor (committee member) |
Dwyer, David Sundt, Melora |
| Abstract | The purpose of the present study was to determine what problems are solved and created when two school districts and one charter school partnered with a private company to provide alternative education to at-risk students. The research also aimed to address lessons learned as well as principal advantages and disadvantages of the partnership. Data collection included interviews with top district officials and principals along with the private company's management team. Focus group interviews were conducted with students and staff from the sites. Observational data, documents, and student-level data were also collected. Data analysis consisted of comparing the responses of individuals who occupied similar roles at different sites and those who occupied different roles. Data from observations, documents, and students were used to test the reliability of the results.; Findings suggested that the partnership solved a number of problems: It addressed the needs of a number of at-risk students, represented a viable alternative for districts, existed within the districts and enabled partners to take advantage of one another's resources. On the other hand, the partnership created problems by jeopardizing effective teaching and learning practices, lacking criteria for enrolling students and hiring staff that fit, and creating confusion among stakeholders. Lessons learned included the necessity of shared commitment and values in a partnership, that no silver bullet exists to address the dropout problem, and that leadership matters. As for principal advantages, districts found the private partner to be responsive, stakeholders learned from one another, and supportive relationships were fostered. However certain disadvantages were apparent as well: negative perceptions of the program, distance, and some stakeholders’ difficulty working with an unfamiliar entity. A surprising finding was that the charter school leaders, unlike their district counterparts, were committed to investigating options for off-track youth beyond the partnership. In addition, the management team from the private company noted several disadvantages of working with districts though top district officials did not express a similar concern with respect to the private firm.; The findings from this study suggest that future research is needed to determine why students leave alternative education programs so that additional options to recapture off-track youth may be devised. Further research is also necessary to determine why certain organizations foster individuals’ drives to seek solutions to complicated problems such as dropout. Finally, how private companies can thrive working with districts is worthy of additional research. In terms of policy, findings from the present study suggest that partnerships between private companies and public schools can help create educational options for at-risk youth. |
| Keyword | dropout; at-risk; public-private partnership; alternative education; intervention; computer-assisted learning |
| Geographic subject (country) | USA |
| Language | English |
| Part of collection | University of Southern California dissertations and theses |
| Publisher (of the original version) | University of Southern California |
| Place of publication (of the original version) | Los Angeles, California |
| Publisher (of the digital version) | University of Southern California. Libraries |
| Provenance | Electronically uploaded by the author |
| Type | texts |
| Legacy record ID | usctheses-m2912 |
| Rights | Callet, Valerie |
| Repository name | Libraries, University of Southern California |
| Repository address | Los Angeles, California |
| Repository email | http://www.usc.edu/isd/libraries/services/ask_a_librarian/email/ |
| Filename | etd-Callet-3441 |
| Archival file | uscthesesreloadpub_Volume14/etd-Callet-3441.pdf |
Description
| Title | Page 1 |
| Full text | PROBLEMS SOLVED, PROBLEMS CREATED: A CRITICAL-CASE ANALYSIS OF A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION FOR AT-RISK STUDENTS By Valerie Callet ______________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Presented to the FACULTY OF THE USC ROSSIER SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May 2010 Copyright 2010 Valerie Callet |
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1

