McDuffie, Dizenfeld in runoff
By RICH WISEMAN Assistant city editor
Barring a new development tonight, Ron McDuffie and Dave Dizenfeld will square off for the ASSC presidency next week.
McDuffie comfortable led the flied in yesterday’s primary with a tally of 879 votes; Dizenfeld wound up with 462. The runoffs are scheduled for next Wednesday.
Sam Tower, who finished directly behind Dizenfeld with a 447 tally, asked Dan Wallace, elections commissioner, for a recount. Wallace said a recount wauld take place at the YWCA at 7 p.m.
“I’m pleased,” Dizenfeld said after the results were announced at the YWCA. “I’m very grateful to those who came out, worked and voted for me. I hope they will stay with me.”
Dizenfeld said he would go back to the grassroots level of campaigning in the next week.
“I’m going door-to-door everywhere,” he said. “I’m going to be talking to people on a one-to-one basis to let them know where Dave Dizenfeld stands as a candidate.”
He said he does not plan to focus on any new issues. “My concern if for the things that need to be done that have been neglected,” Dizenfeld said. “I’m concerned with the equality of students’ rights. I’m concerned with those long-forgotten students, the international students.” Dizenfeld appraised his opponent:
“I’ve known Ron for awhile,” he said. “He’s a real nice guy. I am looking forward to the runoff campaign.”
The junior political science major said he would be willing to debate McDuffie.
McDuffie appeared 'briefly at the YWCA but was not present when the results were read. He was unavailable for comment.
Both Chuck Jones and Carolyn Roper were
pleased with their showings in the vice-president for academic affairs race. Roper, who polled 998 votes, and Jones, who polled 735, meet in the runoffs.
“I want to thank all the students who turned out to vote in this election, my supporters and my opponents alike,” Jones said. “Together, they'have proved that USC is no longer a university of apathy, but is beginning to recognize the value of true student involvement.”
Jones announced his regimen for the upcoming week.
“In the next seven days I will go to the voters again with the same qualifications and the same ideas which have placed me in this runoff,” he said. “I will go to the voters emphasizing a broad view of the many problems facing this university community versus the hastily conceived cure-all platitudes of a novice in USC government.”
'Jones accused Miss Roper of not being competent to deal with university matters. He said he will challenge her to a debate.
“I think it (my showing) is a positive move,” Miss Roper said. “It shows students are going on a candidate’s qualifications.
“At first I didn’t think J had a chance.”
Miss iRoper said she will continue to campaign on her platform, which calls for expanding student activities.
“I’ll be hitting all the dorms, all the factions,” she said. “I want everyone to benefit.”
Miss Roper accused Jones of not having the background to serve. She cited her previous experience at East Los Angeles Junior College, where she was associated women’s president.
“By the way, I don’t want the women’s liberation movement to stand in my way,” she laughed, “I’m running on my record.”
University of Southern California
DAILY 9 TROJAN
VOL. LXI, NO. 102
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, APRIL 9, 1970
Scholarship fee passed by voters
The fee to aid low-income students was given a slim voter approval in yesterday’s election.
Unofficial returns were 1,569 yes to 1,406 no. Dan Wallace, elections commissioner, said the tally might fluctuate upon a recount but added the variance would be negligible.
The passing of the fee proposition means students will be charged an additional $4 a semester beginning in the fall.
It is expected that the fee will raise $330,000 for scholarships in the first three years. That figure will be matched on a 2-1 ratio by the USC Associates, a support group, for the first three years.
The fee will remain in effect until 1980. An estimated $2 million in scholarships will be provided over-all.
The fee received widespread campus support. Five of the six ASSC presidential candidates came out in its favor. Variouf, groups, including the ASSC Executive Council, Interfratemity Council, Black Student Union, and MECHA also supported it.
Ron McDuffie originally proposed the fee in an ASSC Executive Council meeting.
Faculty coffee slated today at 3
An informal faculty-admin-istration coffee will be held today from 3 to 4:30 p.m. in the Faculty Center.
President Norman Topping has invited members of the faculty and administration to an informal, open-topic discussion.
Election results
* Asterick denots runoff candidates CAPITALS denote winners.
PRESIDENT		AWS	
Dave Dizenfeld	462	VICE-PRESIDENT	
Wayne Howard	361	BARBARA BELL	438
Russel Karlen	388	Write-in	18
Ron McDuffie	879		
Fred Minnes	317	SENIOR CLASS	
Sam Tower	447	PRESIDENT	
Write-in	68	JOHN FOOTE	373
		Write-in	68
VICE-PRESIDENT FOR			
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS		SENIOR REPRESENTATIVE	
Russel Burrows	239	*Dave Druker	106
Ken Hamada	418	Mike Forster	29
Chuck Jones	735	Steve Oqle	22
Carolyn Roper	998	Robert Reiss	48
Write-in	38	Harvey Swedloff	41
		•Jeff Morton	57
VICE-PRESIDENT		Write-in	72
FOR PROGRAMS			
Jim Gross	913	JUNIOR REPRESENTATIVE	
TOM LEVYN	1236	*Chuck Benninghoff	159
Wrie-in	132	*Lee Blackman	159
		Don Franzen	74
AMS PRESIDENT		*Miles Mitchell	243
CRAIG CALDWELL	856	Write-in	25
Tim Wells	606		
Write-in	53	SOPHOMORE	
		REPRESENTATIVE	
AWS PRESIDENT		STEVE GOLDFISHER	328
GEORGETTA BANKS	341	Heidi Postelnek	219
Bonnie Lockrem	113	Ted Weitz	85
Write-in	13	Wrie-in	23
AMS		INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS	
VICE-PRESIDENT		REPRESENTATIVE	
GEORGE MILBURN, JR.	959	NADER OSKOUI	48
Write-in	124	Write-in	1
WE’RE NUMBER ONE
Feminist Lisa Ross displays her own philosophy.
Photo by Bruce Boii
Bolinger
Playboy attacked by student feminists
By NANCI MURDOCK
Contrary to the obvious druthers of Anson Mount, the public affairs manager of Playboy Magazine, he and his publication locked horns, not bunny ears, with a group of USC feminists Wednesday as he delivered a lecture at noon in Bovard Auditorium as part of this week’s Sexual Role-Playing Conference.
On Tuesday, this group of students promised confrontation and a disruptive demonstration. True to their word, the women’s liberation and the Social Mobilization Committees of USC picketed the speech. One of the members put on bunny ears and undulated in the audience, and other members ran on stage during the speech and tried to take over the microphone.
Lisa 'Ross, chairman of the Student Mobilization Committee, said, “Playboy oppresses not only women, but men also, as they force them into rigid sexual roles.
“A man is supposed to dress like Madison Avenue and the women—they don’t want them dressed. They want them prone— look at the centerfold.”
The botton floor of Bovard was filled to capacity. About a dozen members of the female liberation movement sat in the front row.
iMount began by discussing the moral revolution, which he said was simply the replacing of phony values with real ones. The older generation has left us with a mess, and the younger generation is taking a critical view and discarding the sham, he said.
At this point there was an interruption, which was the first of a series that ended up disrupting the whole lecture. A member of the women’s liberation group asked who was interested in the moral revolution. The moral revolution is ancient history, she said.
Mount answered that he would be happy to have her come up and speak when he was through.
Roman society did not fall apart from sexual deviation; it fell apart because it was corrupt, Mount said.
The new morality is not really new at all, it goes back to Jesus when he was fighting the Jewish establishment of his day, Mount explained.
A student interrupted Mount by saying it may not be new morality, but Playboy was sure making money from it.
“What’s wrong with making money?” Mount asked.
Going back to his morality theme, Mount said each person has to set his own morals. He said it seemed “killing people is a lot more serious business than going to bed with them.
“Our world has been changing rapidly, but the church is still giving 13th century answers to 20th century problems,” Mount claimed.
When (Mount said that many think of the college campus as a place of nude parties and marijuana smoking, the audience cheered. “It’s bugging parents that their kids are having more fun then they ever did,” he said.
It was then that a young girl stood up and put on bunny ears, and starting to sway sexily.
A student yelled at Mount, “What’s Playboy’s role in regard to sex?”
A member of the female liberation movement answered, “I think it (iPlayboy) is for those who can’t get any,” as the audience applauded.
(Continued on page 3)